Categories
World News

Multimillion-dollar app founders’ share ideas for beginning a enterprise

When husband-and-wife duo Chris Halim and Raena Lim quit their jobs in 2016 to start their own sustainable fashion business, they had little idea of the success it would become.

But they knew one thing for sure: get a basic product to market as soon as possible — that’s the advice they stand by today.

“As start-up founders, especially at the beginning, there is a strong temptation to build the perfect product before you launch anything, or very strong temptation to aim for all the features and over-engineer everything,” said Halim, an ex-consultant.

“From our learnings, that would be a mistake,” the Style Theory CEO told CNBC Make It.

Start simple

Once Halim and his banker wife, Lim, identified an opportunity to bring a clothes rental service to Singapore, they wasted little time in creating a waitlist to gauge interest before rolling out the service to a small number of consumers.

The best way to launch anything is always do it simple with minimal scope, get it to market asap.

Chris Halim

co-founder and CEO, Style Theory

As demand grew, the couple expanded their user base and apparel collection, adapting to customer requests as they went.

It’s advice shared by many business leaders, including in the iconic book “The Lean Startup,” which recommends entrepreneurs build a minimum viable product (MVP) and then test and iterate quickly in response to customer feedback.

The co-founders of Style Theory, Raena Lim and Chris Halim.

Style Theory

“The best way to launch anything is always do it simple with minimal scope, get it to market asap, then get customers’ feedback,” said Lim.

“Based on customers’ feedback, you can then iterate and make it better. I think that’s a much better way to build something that customers will love,” he continued.

Dream big

The couple’s nimble, data-driven approach has served them well. Five years on, the company boasts some 200,000 users across Singapore and Indonesia, and a collection of 50,000 clothes and 2,200 shoes.

With backing to the tune of $30 million from investors including Softbank, Alpha JWC Ventures and the Paradise Group, the company now plans to expand into Hong Kong and introduce menswear and kidswear.

In entrepreneurship, you face failures every day … it’s much more important to focus on what are you going to do next.

Chris Halim

co-founder and CEO, Style Theory

“That future is for you to build and you get to dream it with your team and say, let’s make the call to do something so different,” said co-founder Lim.

But, the pair cautioned, it’s important to take the highs with the lows. Their business was hit hard by the pandemic and despite pivoting to offer new services, the rental service has today recovered just 75% of pre-pandemic users.

“In entrepreneurship, you face failures every day, you make wrong decisions all the time and it’s all on you,” said Halim.

“It’s much more important to focus on what are you going to do next, how are you going to fix it, and how you’re going to grow the business next.”

Don’t miss: This husband-and-wife team shares their tips for going into business together

Like this story? Subscribe to CNBC Make It on YouTube!

Categories
World News

Deliveroo shares rise after German rival takes stake within the enterprise

A Deliveroo courier travels down Regent Street delivering takeaway food in central London during Covid-19 Tier 4 restrictions.

Pietro Recchia | SOPA pictures | LightRocket via Getty Images

LONDON – Shares in grocery supplier Deliveroo rose over 10% on Monday after the company announced that larger German rival Delivery Hero had acquired a 5.09% stake in the company.

The company’s stock rose from £ 3.36 ($ 4.66) per share to £ 3.60 per share in early trades on the London Stock Exchange on Monday, its highest level since trading began in March. Meanwhile, Delivery Hero shares on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange remained relatively unchanged.

Deliveroo’s market value is around £ 8 billion, so Delivery Hero’s investment is worth around £ 400 million. Deliveroo declined to comment on the exact amount of the investment, while Delivery Hero did not immediately respond to a CNBC request for comment.

In a notice to investors, Deliveroo announced that Delivery Hero would sell it after the market closed on March 6.

Founded in 2013 by Will Shu and Greg Orlowski, Deliveroo received a boost from Amazon in 2019 when the e-commerce giant launched a $ 575 million funding round into the company.

With a turnover of 4.1 billion

Deliveroo went public in March and while trading got off to a bumpy start, the company’s share price has since rebounded somewhat.

Delivery Hero’s investment comes in the midst of a period of consolidation in the food delivery market.

Deliveroo, headquartered in London, and Delivery Hero, headquartered in Berlin, are two of the largest food delivery companies in Europe and have been battling for market share in countries across the continent and beyond for almost a decade.

Delivery Hero, which is significantly larger than Deliveroo with a market capitalization of around 30 billion euros ($ 35 billion), also has minority stakes in food suppliers like Glovo, Just Eat Takeaway, Rappi, and Zomato.

Delivery Hero co-founder and CEO Niklas Östberg said on Twitter that Deliveroo felt “undervalued” and added that he had “great respect” for Shu and his team. Delivery Hero has been buying shares since April, paying an average of £ 2.70 per share, Östberg said.

It competes with Deliveroo in the Middle East through its Talabat business and in Hong Kong and Singapore through its Foodpanda divisions.

However, Deliveroo and Delivery Hero do not compete in the UK, which is Deliveroo’s main market. That’s because Delivery Hero sold its UK business Hungryhouse to Just Eat in 2016 for around £ 200 million.

Like UberEats and DoorDash, Deliveroo and Delivery Hero rely on an army of self-employed couriers to deliver groceries from restaurant kitchens to homes and offices in cities around the world in around 30 minutes while cutting down on each order.

Categories
Politics

U.S.-China Commerce Talks Ought to Resume, U.S. Enterprise Teams Say

A group of America’s most influential corporate groups are urging the Biden government to resume trade talks with China and lower tariffs on Chinese-made goods that remained in effect after the trade war began between the two countries.

The groups, which represented interests as diverse as potato growers, microchip companies and the pharmaceutical industry, said in a letter Thursday that the Biden government should take “swift action” to address “onerous” tariffs. They also urged the White House to work with the Chinese government to ensure it honors the commitments they made in their trade peace signed with the Trump administration in early 2020.

The letter, addressed to the Treasury Department and the United States’ sales representative, comes as relations between the world’s two largest economies remain at odds. A high-profile visit to China by Wendy R. Sherman, the deputy foreign minister, last month started with sharp opening remarks from the Chinese side and ended with little progress. The two have argued over human rights, cyberattacks and China’s military operations in the South China Sea.

While the Biden government has developed a strategy of confronting China on a number of issues, it has said less about the countries’ economic relations.

It has been more than seven months since former President Donald J. Trump signed a January 2020 trade deal with China, along with other national security measures taken by the previous administration. Officials have not yet disclosed the results of this review.

The January 2020 trade stall essentially frozen US tariffs on Chinese imports of $ 360 billion. This deal also did nothing to stop the Chinese government’s subsidies for strategic industries such as computer chips and electric cars that worried American competitors. While some of the provisions of the trade agreement expire at the end of the year, much of the agreement will remain in force.

The industry group’s letter appeared to be an attempt to get the Biden government to act.

“Because of the tariffs, US industry is facing increased costs to manufacture products and provide services domestically, making its exports of those products and services less competitive overseas,” the letter read by the New York Times was reviewed.

Adam Hodge, a spokesman for the US Trade Representative’s office, said, “For the first half of this year, the US economy grew as fast as it has been in nearly 40 years, and more jobs were created in the first six months” than any other Administration in history. ”He added that the government is“ conducting a robust, strategic review of our economic relations with China to create effective policies ”.

The existence of the letter was previously reported by the Wall Street Journal.

The letter said China had met some of its trade deal commitments, including new measures to open up its market to US financial institutions. It added that further talks are the only way to ensure that China meets remaining commitments in other sectors such as intellectual property protection.

Although China has purchased substantial US goods since the trade war, the amount and composition have lagged behind its pledges to purchase US $ 200 billion worth of American goods and services in 2020 and 2021. According to an analysis by the Peterson Institute for International Economically, China lagged 40 percent behind those purchases last year and is 30 percent behind this year.

“We urge the government to work with the Chinese government to increase purchases of US goods through the remainder of 2021 and to implement all structural commitments of the agreement before its two-year anniversary on February 15, 2022,” the letter added added.

While the Biden government has questioned whether the trade deal with China was well designed, it has also signaled that it will continue to press China into unfair trade practices.

In June, President Biden expanded a Trump administration blacklist that prevented Americans from investing in Chinese companies that aid the country’s military or the repression of religious minorities. Mr. Biden put Huawei, a Chinese telecommunications giant, on the list of banned companies. The White House also announced the formation of a trade and technology council with American and European officials to counter China’s influence by coordinating digital policy between Brussels and Washington.

“We will not hesitate to highlight China’s compulsive and unfair trade practices that harm American workers, undermine the multilateral system, or violate fundamental human rights,” said Katherine Tai, the United States trade representative, in a prepared statement for a Senate hearing in May . “We are working on a strong strategic approach to our trade and economic relations with China.”

Categories
Politics

U.S. warns firms concerning the dangers of doing enterprise in Hong Kong as China clamps down on rights

The national flags of the USA and China fly in front of a building.

The Eng Koon | AFP via Getty Images

WASHINGTON – The Biden government on Friday warned companies with offices in Hong Kong of far-reaching financial and regulatory risks as China continues to restrict political and economic freedoms in the area.

The nine-page Hong Kong Business Advisory – jointly published by the Departments of State, Finance, Trade and Homeland Security – warns that US firms in Hong Kong are exposed to a number of risks posed by China’s national security law.

The report states that “companies are exposed to risks in connection with electronic surveillance without an arrest warrant and the disclosure of data to authorities as well as“ restricted access to information ”.

“Beijing has damaged Hong Kong’s reputation for accountable, transparent governance and respect for individual freedoms and has broken its promise to keep Hong Kong’s high levels of autonomy unchanged for 50 years,” Foreign Minister Antony Blinken wrote in a statement.

“In light of Beijing’s decisions last year that stifled the democratic aspirations of the Hong Kong people, we are taking action. Today we are sending a clear message that the United States is resolutely on the side of the Hong Kong people, ”added the country’s top diplomat.

The Biden government also imposed US sanctions on seven Chinese officials for violating Hong Kong’s autonomy.

The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Earlier this week, the Biden government issued a warning to companies with investment ties to China’s Xinjiang Province, citing growing evidence of genocide and other human rights abuses in the country’s northwestern region.

Washington has openly criticized Beijing’s comprehensive national security law, passed in June 2020, aimed at restricting Hong Kong’s autonomy and banning critical literature about the Chinese Communist Party.

The then Foreign Secretary Mike Pompeo described the measure as an “Orwellian move” and an attack “on the rights and freedoms of the people of Hong Kong”.

Former President Donald Trump soon signed a law imposing sanctions on China in response to its interference with Hong Kong’s autonomy. He also signed an executive order ending the preferential treatment that Hong Kong has long enjoyed.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

“Hong Kong is now being treated like mainland China,” Trump said during a July 2020 speech from the White House rose garden.

“No special privileges, no special economic treatment and no export of sensitive technologies,” said Trump. “Also, as you know, we are imposing massive tariffs and have imposed very high tariffs on China.”

China’s State Department fired back, saying Beijing would impose retaliatory sanctions on US people and businesses.

Categories
Health

GSK client enterprise cut up off after investor strain from Elliott Administration

View of the headquarters of the British pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline in west London.

Ben Stansall | AFP | Getty Images

LONDON — British pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline faces a crunch meeting with investors on Wednesday after announcing a new strategy for the next decade centered on the splitting off of the company’s substantial consumer products arm.

The new core drug and vaccine division, which CEO Emma Walmsley has dubbed “New GSK,” has set targets of 5% sales growth and 10% profit growth between now and 2026. The separation is expected to take effect in mid-2022.

GSK is also aiming for more than £33 billion ($46.2 billion) worth of sales by the end of the decade, which it hopes will offset the loss of exclusivity over HIV medication dolutegravir in 2028.

Investors have reacted positively to the plans thus far, with GSK shares up 3% by mid-afternoon trade in Europe.

However, Walmsley will need the backing of investors at the company’s Capital Markets Day, having been under pressure of late from U.S. activist investor Elliott Management. The virtual session begins at 2 p.m. London time on Wednesday.

Walmsley told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Europe” on Wednesday that the separation of the business was a “step change in growth” and the culmination of a four-year transformational plan, aiming to address “perennial underperformance” in the business.

“This growth is all about a quality vaccines and specialty medicines portfolio, and that is really core to the strategy of New GSK, being focused on prevention of disease as well as treatment,” she said.

“It’s about setting out New GSK as a growth company with new ambitions for shareholders, but also our chance to impact positively the health of 2.5 billion people over the next decade.”

The separate consumer health business, comprising brands like Panadol and Sensodyne, will be demerged with “at least 80%” of the value being returned to shareholders, while GSK plans to temporarily hold 20% to be sold at a later stage.

New GSK will cut its dividend to 45 pence per share in 2023, compared to the 80 pence offered by GSK this year, while the new consumer arm will offer 55p.

Categories
World News

Apple is popping privateness right into a enterprise benefit

Apple unveiled new versions of its operating systems on Monday which showed that the company’s focus on privacy has taken a new turn. It’s not just a corporate ideal or a marketing point anymore. It’s now a major initiative across Apple distinguishing its products from Android and Windows competition.

Apple has positioned itself as the most privacy-sensitive big technology company since Apple CEO Tim Cook wrote an open letter on the topic in 2014. Since then, Apple has introduced new iPhone features that restrict app access to personal data and advertised privacy heavily in television ads.

But Monday’s announcements showed that Apple’s privacy strategy is now part of its products: Privacy was mentioned as part of nearly every new feature, and got stage time of its own.

Privacy-focused features and apps announced by Apple on Monday for forthcoming operating systems iOS 15 or MacOS Monterey included:

  • No tracking pixels. The Mail app will now run images through proxy servers to defeat tracking pixels that tell email marketers when and where messages were opened.
  • Private Relay. Subscribers to Apple’s iCloud storage service will get a feature called iCloud+ which includes Private Relay, a service that hides user IP addresses, which are often used to infer location. An Apple representative said it’s not a virtual private network, a type of service often used by privacy-sensitive people to access web content in areas where it’s restricted. Instead, Apple will pass web traffic through both an Apple server and a proxy server run by a third party to strip identifying information.
  • Hide My Email. iCloud subscribers will be able to create and use temporary, anonymous email addresses, sometimes called burner addresses, inside the Mail app.
  • App Privacy Report. Inside the iPhones settings, Apple will tell you which servers apps connect to, shining light on apps that collect data and send it to third parties the user doesn’t recognize. It will also tell users how often the apps use the microphone and camera.

Leveraging Apple’s chip chops

With its focus on privacy, Apple is leaning on one of its core strengths. Increasingly, data is being processed on local devices, like a computer or phone, instead of being sent back to big servers to analyze. This is both more private, because the data doesn’t live on a server, and potentially faster from an engineering standpoint.

Because Apple designs both the iPhone and processors that offer heavy-duty processing power at low energy usage, it’s best poised to offer an alternative vision to Android developer Google which has essentially built its business around internet services.

This engineering distinction has resulted in several new apps and features that do significantly more processing on the phone instead of in the cloud, including:

  • Local Siri. Apple said on Monday that that Siri now doesn’t need to send audio recordings to a server to understand what they say. Instead, Apple’s own voice recognition and processors are powerful enough to do them on the phone. This is a major difference from other assistants like Amazon’s Alexa, which uses serversto decipher speech. It could also make Siri faster.
  • Automatically organizing photos. Apple’s photos app can now use AI software to identify things inside your photo library, like pets, or vacation spots, or friends and family, and automatically organize them into galleries and animations, sometimes with musical accompaniment. Many of these features are available in Google Photos, but Google’s software requires all photos to be uploaded to the cloud. Apple’s technology can do the analysis on the device and even search the contents of the photos with text.

Apple’s privacy infrastructure also allows it to expand into big new markets like online payments, identity, and health, both from a product and marketing perspective.

It can build new products while being sure that it’s following best practices for not collecting unnecessary data or violating policies like Europe’s strict General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

In addition, users may feel more comfortable about features that deal with sensitive data or topics — like finance or health — because they trust Apple and its approach to data.

Features introduced by Apple on Monday show how the company is using its user data position to break into these lucrative markets.

  • Monitoring walking health and sharing medical records. Apple’s health app can now use readings from an iPhone, such movement when the user is walking, to warn them that they might be at risk for a harmful fall because they’re walking unsteadily. Apple will also enable users who connect their iPhone to the health records system to share those records with a doctor, friends, or family. Health data is among the most heavily regulated types of data, and it’s hard to see Apple introducing these features unless it was sure that it had a good reputation among customers and internal competence with handling sensitive data. “Privacy is fundamental in the design and development across all of our health features,” an Apple engineer said while introducing the feature.
  • Government IDs, keycards and car keys in the Wallet app. Apple used the trust it’s built in privacy and security when it launched Apple Card, its credit card with Goldman Sachs, in which users sign up for a line of credit almost entirely inside the app. Now, Apple has introduced several new features for the Wallet app that are most attractive for users who believe Apple’s security and privacy are up to the task. In iOS 15, Apple will enable users to put in car or home keys in their wallet app, which means all someone needs to get inside is their phone. Apple also said, without a lot of details, that it is working with the Transportation Security Administration to put American ID cards, like a driver’s license, inside the Wallet app, too.

Cook has said “privacy is a fundamental human right” and that the company’s policies and his personal stance doesn’t have to do with commerce or Apple’s products.

But being the big technology company that takes data issues seriously could end up being lucrative and allow Apple more freedom to launch new services and products. Facebook, Apple’s Silicon Valley neighbor and vocal Apple critic, has increasingly dealt with challenges launching new products because of the company’s poor reputation on how it handles user data.

Americans also say that privacy is factoring into buying decisions. A Pew study from 2020 said that 52% of Americans decided not to use a product or service because of concerns over data protection.

Categories
Business

Shares, JBS Hack and the Financial system: Dwell Enterprise Updates

Daily Business Briefing

June 2, 2021Updated 

June 2, 2021, 2:49 p.m. ET

Credit…Chet Strange/Getty Images

Production began to resume at nine beef plants in the United States on Wednesday after a cyberattack on the world’s largest meat processor forced them to shut down a day earlier.

Union officials said Wednesday that certain plants were operational but were not at full capacity yet. JBS had said late Tuesday that the “vast majority” of its plants would reopen the next day.

About 400 workers were back on the job at the JBS beef plant in Souderton, Pa., versus about 1,500 who would work in a typical day, said Wendell Young IV, the president of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776, which represents workers at the plant. A JBS beef plant in Cactus, Texas, canceled work for many employees scheduled for one of its shifts on Wednesday, according to a Facebook post meant for workers.

Mr. Young added that the company had told the union that the plant would be running essentially as normal by Thursday, although workers’ start times would be delayed by a few hours.

JBS did not immediately return requests for comment.

The attack has raised concerns about the vulnerability of critical American businesses. Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, urged companies on Wednesday to increase their cybersecurity measures, saying it was “up to a number of these private-sector sector entities to protect themselves.”

Ms. Psaki declined to say whether the U.S. government was planning to retaliate. “We’re not taking any options off the table in terms of how we may respond, but of course there is an internal policy review process to consider that,” she said.

JBS had told the Biden administration on Tuesday that it was a ransomware attack, and that the ransom demand had come from “a criminal organization likely based in Russia,” a White House official said on Tuesday. Ms. Psaki did not provide more specifics on Wednesday, but she said that the administration was in direct contact with the Russians and that President Biden would bring up the issue of cyberattacks with President Vladimir Putin of Russia when they meet in two weeks.

Thousands of workers in Australia, Canada and the United States were affected as shifts were altered or outright canceled Monday and Tuesday. Some U.S. plants were still not back to regular operations on Wednesday. In Australia, factory workers and graziers have not been told when plants would reopen, local news outlets reported.

Prices could increase as a result of the cyberattack, analysts for the Daily Livestock Report said on Wednesday. And the disruption could lead to less so-called spot supplies, the analysts wrote, which could “leave little available for smaller buyers.”

Even so, the analysts said that the attack was likely to “be only a small part in the big picture” as retail meat prices continue to climb during the summer.

The attack was the second to hamper a critical U.S. business operation. Last month, a ransomware attack on Colonial Pipeline, which transports gas to nearly half the East Coast, set off fuel shortages and panic buying.

Read moreHomebuilding in Delaware last month. Significant growth in employment is expected to start in the second half of 2021, the U.N. labor organization said. Credit…Alyssa Schukar for The New York Times

Global employment will take years to return to prepandemic levels, the United Nations’ labor organization said on Wednesday in a report that urged governments to build social protection systems to avoid the destabilizing effects of deepening economic and social inequality.

The pandemic wiped out around 144 million jobs last year, including a projected 30 million new jobs that would have been created, the International Labor Organization said in its assessment of employment and social trends.

“The hit on labor markets in terms of jobs, and in terms of the effect on people’s incomes, has been four times greater than the financial crisis,” Guy Ryder, the organization’s director general, said in an interview.

The organization expects to see significant growth in employment starting in the second half of 2021, but “this will be uneven and not enough to repair the damage caused by the crisis,” Mr. Ryder said.

Overall, the global economy is unlikely to restore those lost jobs until at least by 2023, and that will depend on progress in curbing the spread of the coronavirus, a prospect now overshadowed by its resurgence in Asia and parts of Latin America.

Rich countries, with access to vaccines and the financial resources to support wage-support plans, will recover faster. The United States is likely to face unemployment of around 5.1 percent this year, the report said, dropping to around 3.9 percent in 2022, a level marginally lower than at the start of the pandemic.

But around the world, some 205 million people will still be unemployed in 2022, up from 187 million before the pandemic started, the organization said, most of them in lower income and poor countries. “This unequal recovery risks accentuating still further inequalities in the world of work between countries and within countries,” Mr. Ryder said.

The pandemic has had a “dramatic” social impact, disproportionately hitting employment of women and youth; reversing progress in reducing forced and child labor, and sharply driving up the number of working people still trapped in poverty, Mr. Ryder said.

“It’s very difficult to make comparisons with the 1930s, but we’re in that sort of territory,” he said, referring to the Great Depression. “Unless we take care of what’s happening in the world of work and labor markets, there are some very unpleasant things that can happen in the world.”

Read moreKatherine Tai, the United States trade representative, said the actions would give time for international tax negotiations to progress.Credit…Pete Marovich for The New York Times

The Biden administration on Wednesday moved closer to imposing tariffs on certain goods from six countries in retaliation for taxes those nations have imposed on digital services offered by companies like Facebook, Amazon and Google.

The United States finalized a list of products that would be subject to tariffs but immediately suspended the levies for 180 days while international tax negotiations proceeded.

Under the administration’s announcement, 25 percent tariffs would apply to about $2.1 billion worth of goods from Austria, Britain, India, Italy, Spain and Turkey.

The Trump administration began investigating those countries’ digital services taxes in June 2020, and the Biden administration faced a one-year deadline to take action.

The announcement comes as countries around the world are trying to reach agreement on a range of international tax issues. Those negotiations are being conducted through the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

“The United States is focused on finding a multilateral solution to a range of key issues related to international taxation, including our concerns with digital services taxes,” Katherine Tai, the United States trade representative, said in a statement. “The United States remains committed to reaching a consensus on international tax issues through the O.E.C.D. and G20 processes.”

Ms. Tai added that the actions on Wednesday “provide time for those negotiations to continue to make progress while maintaining the option of imposing tariffs” if necessary at a later date.

In addition to the six countries included in the announcement, France has also been a target for potential retaliatory tariffs by the United States over its digital services tax. The Trump administration planned to put in place tariffs on $1.3 billion worth of French goods, including cosmetics and handbags, but in January, it suspended the tariffs indefinitely.

Read moreA Depop pop-up store in London in 2019.Credit…avid M. Benett/Getty Images

Depop, the fashion resale marketplace beloved by Generation Z, will be acquired by Etsy for $1.6 billion, the two companies announced on Wednesday.

The cash deal, which is expected to close by the third quarter of this year, underscores the growing influence of clothing resale platforms. More shoppers are turning to the secondhand market for something cheaper and — potentially — greener as the overproduction of clothing increasingly adds to landfills.

The trend appears to have been accelerated by the pandemic as more shoppers looked to declutter wardrobes, earn cash by selling their old clothes or set up fashion customization businesses from their bedrooms.

Investor appetite is also on the rise. Last month, Europe’s largest secondhand fashion marketplace, Vinted, raised 250 million euros in a funding round that valued the start-up at €3.5 billion ($4.26 billion), while in the United States companies such as ThredUp and Poshmark have gone public this year.

Depop, which was founded in 2011, has been particularly successful in building a marketplace for younger consumers, who are adopting secondhand fashion faster than any other group. Ninety percent of its users are under 26, with 30 million users across 150 countries. The platform is particularly known for its vintage clothes and streetwear — and for creating a new cohort of online influencers famous for selling their wares.

“We are simply thrilled to be adding Depop — what we believe to be the resale home for Gen Z consumers — to the Etsy family,” said the Etsy chief executive, Josh Silverman.

He said he believed the platform had “significant potential to further scale” and said that he saw “significant opportunities for shared expertise and growth synergies” for Etsy’s apparel sector, which was valued at $1 billion last year.

According to the Boston Consulting Group, the global market for pre-owned apparel is worth up to $40 billion a year — about 2 percent of the total apparel market. It is expected to grow 15 to 20 percent annually for the next five years.

The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of 2021, subject to antitrust reviews in Britain and the United States.

Read moreThe home décor superstore At Home in California.Credit…Getty Images

The home décor superstore At Home agreed last month to sell itself to the private equity firm Hellman & Friedman for about $2.4 billion. But just over a week later, the company’s largest shareholder, CAS Investment Partners, publicly opposed the deal, arguing that it was “grossly” undervalued.

At the heart of the dispute is how to value a company that got a pandemic bounce, but may soon face a new reality. At Home filed its proxy statement on Wednesday, offering an in-depth look at how it is grappling with these dynamics — and the DealBook newsletter broke down the details.

  • The pandemic halted those efforts, and At Home’s stock price plunged below $2 a share. But homebound shoppers pushed up net sales by nearly 50 percent in its third quarter — and its share price rose, too. At Home restarted the sales process in November.

  • In March, when At Home’s stock was trading at around $28 a share, Hellman & Friedman and another unnamed private equity firm jointly bid $32 a share. Talks continued as At Home’s rebound continued — the company twice updated its projections — prompting Hellman & Friedman to raise its offer five times. (The other firm dropped out after bidding surpassed $32.)

  • Hellman finally offered $36 a share, up 17 percent from where At Home’s stock traded before the deal talks leaked. On Wednesday, its shares are trading a little above that, likely on shareholders’ hopes of a higher offer.

The question is how much At Home’s business will continue to grow. CAS thinks the company could be worth more than $135 a share by the end of its 2026 fiscal year, and that the right sale price is therefore above $70 a share — a roughly 128 percent premium.

But At Home is worried that shoppers will revert to prepandemic habits. Other retailers whose businesses jumped during the pandemic have disappointed investors:

  • Shares of Home Depot dipped last month despite smashing expectations, and that company declined to provide financial guidance for next year.

  • The Container Store also saw its shares fall last month despite topping expectations, and is similarly withholding guidance.

At Home is looking for other buyers. As part of the go-shop provision in the Hellman deal, the retailer has reached out to 17 financial sponsors and seven companies. So far, just one — an investment firm — has signed a nondisclosure agreement, though it has yet to make an offer.

Read more

AMC Entertainment, the movie theater chain that’s been a target of small investors in so-called meme stocks, soared on Wednesday, climbing to a $30 billion market valuation.

The shares rose 115 percent by midafternoon, to above $68 apiece, extending a run that has lifted them by more than 3,100 percent this year. The gains were quick enough to warrant a trading pause on the New York Stock Exchange, a measure aimed to allow traders to catch up to a quickly rising or falling stock.

The trading mirrors a frenzy in shares of GameStop in January. Then, like now, small investors egged each other on in forums like WallStreetBets on Reddit, by sharing their successes and ideas and encouraging more buying. Their reasons vary: Some of the earliest investors were driven by the view that companies like AMC and GameStop were being undervalued, others are hoping to help push up the price to force losses onto hedge funds that bet against the stock, and others still aren’t taking the investment seriously at all.

Shares of GameStop rose about 7 percent on Wednesday, to about $267, but are well below their highs from late January when the stock climbed to as high as $347.

AMC acknowledged its growing base of small investors on Wednesday, saying it would offer them perks like free popcorn. The company said in a statement that more than three million small investors own its shares, and their ownership accounts for more than 80 percent of its shares.

“Many of our investors have demonstrated support and confidence in AMC,” Adam Aron, AMC’s chief executive, said in the statement.

The company has also taken advantage of the run-up in shares to bolster its financial position. AMC on Tuesday said it raised $230.5 million by selling shares to a hedge fund. The hedge fund, Mudrick Capital Management, has since sold the stake, Bloomberg News reported.

  • Stocks in the United States and Europe were slightly higher on Wednesday. The S&P 500 rose 0.2 percent and the Stoxx Europe 600 climbed 0.3 percent.

  • Oil prices climbed with futures continuing at their highest since late 2018. West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark, climbed above $68 a barrel.

  • Recent economic data has pointed to a strengthening economic recovery, but investors are closely watching for inflation that might require central banks to take action that could curb growth. On Wednesday, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development said that the annual inflation rate across its 38 member countries rose to 3.3 percent in April 2021, compared with 2.4 percent in March. The jump was fueled by an increase in energy prices of 16.3 percent, the highest rate since September 2008.

Read moreEmployees of Verizon put away traffic cones after installing fiber optic cables on 138th Street and Park Avenue in the Mott Haven neighborhood of the Bronx, New York, last week.Credit…Desiree Rios for The New York Times

Veterans of the nation’s decade-long efforts to extend the broadband footprint worry that President Biden’s new infrastructure plan carries the same bias of its predecessors: Billions will be spent to extend the internet infrastructure to the farthest reaches of rural America, where few people live, and little will be devoted to connecting millions of urban families who live in areas with high-speed service that they cannot afford.

There is a political and economic logic to devoting billions of taxpayer dollars to bringing broadband to the rural communities that make up much of former President Donald Trump’s political base, which Mr. Biden wants to win over. But some critics worry that a capital-heavy rural-first strategy could leave behind urban America, which is more populous, diverse and productive, Eduardo Porter reports for The New York Times.

About 81 percent of rural households are plugged into broadband, compared with about 86 percent in urban areas, according to Census Bureau data. But the number of urban households without a connection, 13.6 million, is almost three times as big as the 4.6 million rural households that don’t have one.

Connecting urban families does not require laying thousands of miles of fiber optic cable through meadows and glens. In cities, telecom companies have already installed a lot of fiber and cable. Extending broadband to unserved urban households, most of them in low-income neighborhoods and often home to families of color, typically requires making the connection cheaper and more relevant.

Read more

  • The new media company that would combine WarnerMedia and Discovery has a name: Warner Bros. Discovery. David Zaslav, the executive who will run the combined companies if the merger is approved by regulators, announced the name at a town-hall-style meeting on Tuesday with WarnerMedia employees in Burbank, Calif. In his first opportunity to introduce himself to his prospective employees, Mr. Zaslav, who has been in charge of Discovery since 2007, spoke with the WarnerMedia chief executive Jason Kilar from the stage of the Steven J. Ross Theater on the Warner Bros. lot. The two executives did not mention the future of Mr. Kilar, who has retained a legal team to negotiate his exit from the company.

Americans will be eligible for a free beer from Anheuser-Busch once the country’s vaccination rate reaches 70 percent.Credit…John Gress/Reuters

The brewing giant Anheuser-Busch said on Wednesday that it would offer Americans another incentive to get vaccinated: free beer.

The company said in a statement that it would “buy America’s next round” of beer, seltzer or nonalcoholic beverage once the country reached President Biden’s goal of having 70 percent of the adult population get at least one coronavirus vaccination by July 4. So far, 63 percent of adult Americans have received at least one dose.

“We pride ourselves on stepping up both in times of need and in times of great celebration, and the past year has been no different,” said Michel Doukeris, the chief executive of Anheuser-Busch, which will offer adults a $5 virtual credit card for beverages if the vaccination goal is met. “As we look ahead to brighter days with renewed optimism, we are proud to work alongside the White House to make a meaningful impact for our country, our communities and our consumers.”

Reaching the vaccination goal by Independence Day may not be easy. The pace of vaccinations in the United States has slowed, with the biggest gains in recent weeks made in vaccinating 12- to 15-year-olds, who are not eligible for the free beer. However, progress has been made in reaching some groups with the highest rates of vaccine hesitancy, including Latinos and people without college degrees, according to the Kaiser Foundation.

Anheuser-Busch’s offer comes as other businesses and states have introduced their own giveaways to encourage vaccinations. Gov. Jim Justice of West Virginia said on Tuesday that the state would give away guns and other prizes, including trucks and lifetime hunting and fishing licenses, to vaccinated residents.

Other states, including California, New Mexico and Ohio, have started lottery drawings to award cash prizes to those who have been vaccinated.

Read moreCredit…Sally Thurer

Today in the On Tech newsletter, Shira Ovide writes that to fully understand the tech industry and ensure that its goals don’t go off the rails, we need to talk more about the companies that are in the meh middle.

Categories
Business

Ransomware Disrupts Meat Vegetation in Newest Assault on Crucial U.S. Enterprise

A cyberattack on the world’s largest meat processor forced the closure of nine beef factories in the United States and interrupted production in poultry and pork factories, according to union officials on Tuesday. The attack could shake the country’s meat markets and raise new questions about the vulnerability of critical American companies.

JBS said most of its plants would reopen on Wednesday. But even a one-day disruption to JBS could “significantly affect” wholesale beef prices, according to analysts for the Daily Livestock Report.

The attack at JBS was a ransomware attack, the White House said – the second recent attack of its kind to freeze a critical US business. Last month, a ransomware attack on the Colonial Pipeline, which carries gas to nearly half of the east coast, sparked gas and kerosene bottlenecks and panic buying.

JBS, which is based in Brazil and accounts for one-fifth of the US daily cattle harvest, said in a statement late Tuesday that it has made “significant strides in solving the cyberattack.”

“Our systems are coming back online and we are not sparing resources to combat this threat,” said Andre Nogueira, CEO of JBS USA, in the statement.

The Department of Agriculture announced Tuesday that it is working with other producers to minimize bottlenecks.

All nine JBS beef factories in the United States closed on Tuesday, according to the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, which represents workers at JBS beef and pork factories. The company’s poultry and pork factories in the US posted on Facebook that they had canceled shifts scheduled for Monday or Tuesday or changed production, some citing “IT problems”.

In addition to the company’s U.S. plants, the shutdowns affected 2,500 workers at a beef factory in Brooks, Alberta, according to Scott Payne, a spokesman for United Food and Commercial Workers Local 401 in Canada. “All shifts were canceled yesterday,” he said on Tuesday. “The morning shift was canceled today. But the afternoon shift has been postponed to today. “

When the plants went online, at least one beef factory delayed the start of production on Wednesday and another changed one of its shifts, according to the factories.

With restaurants and retail customers starting to buy beef in the summer, the wholesale market was “extremely tight,” the analysts for the Daily Livestock Report wrote in a report released on Tuesday. They discovered that a small restaurant in southern Utah had started charging an additional $ 4 for dishes that included carne asada.

“Retailers and beef processors are coming back from a long weekend and need to catch up on orders and make sure the meat crate is full,” the analysts wrote. “If you suddenly get a call that the product may not be delivered tomorrow or this week, it will create very big challenges when it comes to keeping the equipment up and running and keeping the retail case in stock.”

In business today

Updated

June 1, 2021, 12:59 p.m. ET

A prolonged hiatus, the analysts warned, “could add gasoline to an already large flame”.

JBS said it was the target of an “organized cybersecurity attack” that affected systems in North America and Australia, that its backup servers were unaffected, and that it did not expect customer, supplier or employee information to be leaked.

Karine Jean-Pierre, a White House deputy press secretary, told reporters at Air Force One Tuesday that JBS had told the Biden government that it was a ransomware attack and that the ransom was from “a criminal organization based in Russia “came.”

The Federal Bureau of Investigation investigated the hack, and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency was also involved, Ms. Jean-Pierre said.

“The White House is working directly with the Russian government on this matter, sending the message that responsible states do not harbor ransomware criminals,” she said.

In two weeks’ time, President Biden is due to meet Russian President Vladimir V. Putin in Geneva for a summit that puts a multitude of cyberattacks, many of which originate from Russia, at the top of the American agenda.

A recent security breach used SolarWinds software to infiltrate more than 250 federal agencies and companies. It was considered the worst attack because it raised the question of whether the United States could trust its software supply chain. SolarWinds, according to the United States, is the work of the SVR, one of the leading Russian intelligence agencies.

Last week, the SVR was blamed for a breach that hijacked the company that distributes emails on behalf of the US Agency for International Development and sent links containing malware to organizations criticizing Putin.

But ransomware attacks have become more urgent after hackers hit the Colonial Pipeline last month. The pipeline operator shut down its systems after the attack, which led to price rises, panic buying and a shortage of jet fuel. The company later admitted it paid $ 4.4 million to restore its data.

The attack on the Colonial Pipeline was the work of a ransomware operator called DarkSide, which Biden said was based in Russia.

The perpetrator behind the JBS attack has not been publicly identified. Cybersecurity specialists said Tuesday blogs and online channels frequented by large ransomware groups have gone silent – most likely because the group in charge was waiting to see if JBS would pay.

The US government does not know how to deal with the attacks, as many of the responsible groups operate from Russia, where they largely enjoy a safe haven. Russia has refused to extradite its hackers and frequently attacks them for sensitive intelligence operations.

Mr Biden said after the attack on the Colonial Pipeline that Russia was partly responsible, although there was no evidence that the government was involved.

“We were in direct communication with Moscow to get responsible countries to take decisive action against these ransomware networks,” said Biden. “We will also take action to disrupt their operability.”

He did not rule out the possibility of the US launching a cyber attack against the criminals responsible for the pipeline attack. Following Mr Biden’s remarks, DarkSide criminals said they would close, despite cybersecurity experts warning that they would likely be renamed and reappear.

David E. Sanger and William P. Davis contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Business

The Week in Enterprise: Biden’s Large Funds

Good morning and have a nice Memorial Day weekend. Here are the biggest business and tech stories you should know for the coming (short) week. – Charlotte Cowles

Exxon Mobil suffered a surprise defeat when climate activist investors won at least two seats on its 12-member board of directors on Wednesday. The investors are part of a small new hedge fund called Engine No. 1, which aims to lead businesses to greener initiatives and away from fossil fuels. The campaign faces an uphill battle in the energy industry, but this latest victory could lead more Wall Street investment firms to face climate change. In addition to the momentum, a Dutch court ruled that Royal Dutch Shell, Europe’s largest oil company, is not working fast enough to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and needs to redouble its efforts.

For the past three weeks, Apple has been vigorously (and dearly) defending itself in federal court against an antitrust lawsuit from Epic Games, the maker of the popular video game Fortnite. The case focused on whether Apple abused its market power by receiving a 30 percent commission on sales from its iPhone app store – and penalizing Epic for trying to bypass Apple and Fortnite’s in-app purchases sell directly to customers. The verdict is now in the hands of the judge, who said she hoped to deliver a verdict by August. If Apple loses, it could lead to more antitrust proceedings against Big Tech.

Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, the 97-year-old film and television studio that once embodied a golden era in Hollywood, has sold itself to today’s epitome of modern commerce: Amazon. Many of MGM’s classics were sold years ago, but it brings a famous franchise – James Bond – that gives Amazon a new edge over streaming competitors like Netflix, HBO Max, and Apple TV +. That benefit cost Amazon $ 8.45 billion, about 40 percent more than other potential buyers, including Apple and Comcast, were willing to pay.

Google is working with hospital chain HCA Healthcare to develop algorithms for patient care by dismantling health records. The algorithms are designed to improve patient monitoring, guide doctors’ decisions for better outcomes, streamline operations, and even develop new treatments. But progress comes at a cost, of course: patient privacy. HCA said its patient records would no longer contain identifying information before Google data scientists were given access to it. However, the terms of the contract were not made public.

President Biden proposed a $ 6 trillion budget for fiscal 2022, which provides a map of long-term investments in his administration’s economic priorities – such as infrastructure, education, and green energy – for the next decade. The proposal, which is more of a wish-list at this point, would bring the United States to the highest sustainable federal spending level since World War II. Mr Biden has announced that he will pay for his agenda through tax hikes for businesses and high earners, but the plan also sees large budget deficits for at least a decade. The budget provides for unemployment below 4 percent and stable inflation.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen will meet with the Group of Seven Treasury Ministers in London later this week to discuss the nations’ next steps towards global economic recovery. Up to date: helping international access and spreading vaccines, improving public health to prevent future pandemics, and building more climate-friendly economies. Ms. Yellen has a similar agenda at home, and it’s a handful. Prior to leaving, she asked for more funds from the Treasury Department to oversee several key US economic recovery efforts.

Categories
Business

Immediately’s Enterprise and Markets Information: Dwell Updates

Daily Business Briefing

May 27, 2021Updated just nowCredit…Yuri Gripas/Reuters

Exxon Mobil was dealt a stunning loss at its annual shareholder meeting on Wednesday from an unlikely opponent: a small new activist investor focused on climate change, Engine No. 1. The hedge fund won at least two seats on the oil giant’s 12-member board. It may yet claim a third nominee when the counting is over.

For corporate America, the DealBook newsletter reports, the upset victory for Engine No. 1 and its allies is a clear sign that company boards and leaders need to pay attention to environmental, social and governance issues (known as E.S.G.) — or suffer rebukes.

Exxon was the first activist campaign for Engine No. 1, which was founded last year by an energy and tech investor, Chris James. Its head of active engagement is Charlie Penner, a veteran hedge fund executive who helped lead campaigns against companies like Apple while at Jana Partners.

Engine No. 1 began agitating against the oil giant in December, calling on the company to diversify away from fossil fuels and reduce its carbon emissions. But it began work on the campaign last March, courting large investors like public pension funds that held far larger stakes in Exxon, and thus had more sway. That’s how it parlayed a stake of just 0.02 percent into getting its preferred nominees on the company’s board.

Exxon’s shares rose 1.2 percent Wednesday.

The fund’s campaign was a bet on a confluence of events, according to two people with knowledge of the matter, including longstanding investor dissatisfaction with Exxon’s corporate governance and a growing appreciation on Wall Street for E.S.G.

That position appeared to be supported after the Exxon meeting. In a note explaining why it backed some of Engine No. 1’s board candidates, BlackRock — which owns nearly 7 percent of Exxon — said the company’s directors “need to further assess the company’s strategy and board expertise against the possibility that demand for fossil fuels may decline rapidly in the coming decades.”

Exxon had largely played down Engine No. 1’s concerns, and pressured the firm to drop its challenge after a much bigger hedge fund, D.E. Shaw, called off a campaign. But Engine No. 1 persisted, and also benefited from timing: It began its campaign while oil prices were still depressed by the pandemic. Had oil not rebounded in recent months, Engine No. 1 executives believed, all four of its proposed directors might have been elected, the people with knowledge of the matter said.

Exxon’s loss was just one sign on Wednesday that Big Oil is facing a climate reckoning. A Dutch court ruled that Royal Dutch Shell must speed up its efforts to cut its carbon emissions. And Chevron shareholders backed a proposal to compel the company to help customers reduce their own emissions.

Read moreAn Exxon Mobile oil refinery in Channahon, Ill. Shareholders say the oil giant should invest more heavily in renewables like wind and solar energy.Credit…Tannen Maury/EPA, via Shutterstock

Big Oil was dealt a stunning defeat on Wednesday when shareholders of Exxon Mobil elected at least two board candidates nominated by activist investors who pledged to steer the company toward cleaner energy and away from oil and gas.

The success of the campaign, led by a tiny hedge fund against the nation’s largest oil company, could force the energy industry to confront climate change and embolden Wall Street investment firms that are prioritizing the issue, The New York Times’s Clifford Krauss and Peter Eavis report.

Engine No. 1, the hedge fund leading the campaign, was seeking to defeat four of the company’s 12 director candidates. Its victory is a sharp rebuke to Darren W. Woods, Exxon’s chairman and chief executive, and is the culmination of years of efforts by activists to force the oil giant to change its environmental policies and approach. Engine No. 1 and its allies had argued that Exxon’s stance on climate change and the oil and gas business was not just bad for the planet but that it would hurt the company’s profits in the future as governments required businesses to reduce and eventually eliminate emissions of greenhouse gases.

Gregory Goff, former chief executive of Andeavor, a refiner, and Kaisa Hietala, an environmental scientist and former executive at Neste, a Finnish energy company that produces biofuels, were the two nominees declared winners. The company said the final results would not be publicly available Wednesday, and an independent inspector will determine the timing of an announcement.

“This isn’t really about ideology, it’s about economics,” Chris James, founder of Engine No. 1, said. “And economics is what has driven the adoption of some of the alternative fuel sources versus fossil fuels. We want there to be an acceptance of change.”

“We welcome the new directors,” said Mr. Woods, the Exxon head. “While there is still more to do, we are proud of the progress we have made to reduce emissions and clear plans for further reductions.”

“This signals a new era for the role of corporations in climate change and a new era for corporate governance,” said Erik Gordon, a University of Michigan business professor.

The vote reveals the growing power of giant Wall Street firms that manage the 401(k)s and other investments of individuals and businesses to press chief executives to pursue environmental and social goals. Some of these firms are run by executives who say they see climate change as a major threat to the economy and the planet. The loss of at least two seats on its board will almost surely energize activists to pressure Exxon, other oil companies and businesses in various industries that they believe are not doing enough to address climate change.

Read moreThe audience at an AMC theater in Manhattan in March. Shares in AMC have risen sharply this week.Credit…Evan Agostini/Invision, via Associated Press

U.S. stock futures fell slightly on Thursday before fresh data is released later in the day on state unemployment benefit claims and durable goods sales. The jobless claims are expected to fall for a fourth week to the lowest level since before the pandemic.

Investors will be watching jobs data closely in the United States, as a measure of how the economic recovery is progressing and how much monetary stimulus the economy still needs.

The Federal Reserve has a dual mandate to keep inflation stable and reach full unemployment, and recent data has shown a sharp rise in prices. Policymakers say the increase is likely to be temporary, but they have been “talking about talking” about when the central bank will be ready to slow down its bond-buying program. The monetary stimulus has helped keep stock prices high.

That said, the strength of the labor market is being vigorously debated. In April, job gains slowed sharply and some employers have complained about struggling to fill vacancies even as millions of people remain unemployed.

Randal K. Quarles, the Federal Reserve’s vice chair for supervision, said on Wednesday that he thought the central bank should start discussing how and when to slow its big bond purchases.

  • The Stoxx Europe 600 rose 0.1 percent, creeping up for a sixth day and touching another record high.

  • Oil prices fell. Futures of West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark, dropped 0.8 percent to $65.70 a barrel.

  • Shares in Eli Lilly fell 1 percent in premarket trading after the drugmaker said in a regulatory filling that it had received a subpoena from the Department of Justice for documents concerning its manufacturing plant in Branchburg, N.J. Reuters has reported about accusations of irregularities in quality control at the plant, where Lilly makes a Covid-19 treatment.

  • Shares in AMC, the big movie theater chain, dropped 6 percent and was one of the most traded stocks in premarket trading, while shares in video game retailer GameStop fell 4 percent. AMC shares have jumped 62 percent this week and GameStop rose 37 percent as the popular “meme stocks” picked up steam again.

  • Shares in Royal Dutch Shell fell 1.4 percent on Thursday after a Dutch court ruled on Wednesday that Shell, Europe’s largest oil company, must speed up its reduction of carbon dioxide emissions to tackle climate change. The court said Shell was “obliged” to reduce the carbon dioxide emissions of its activities by 45 percent at the end of 2030 compared with 2019.

  • Exxon Mobil shares slipped in premarket trading after shareholders of the largest oil company in the United States elected at least two board candidates nominated by activist investors who pledged to move the company away from oil and gas to cleaner energy.

Read moreA job fair organized by High Road Restaurants in New York. New claims for state jobless benefits fell to their lowest weekly level since before the pandemic.Credit…Justin Lane/EPA, via Shutterstock

  • Initial claims for state jobless benefits fell last week, the Labor Department reported Thursday.

  • The weekly figure was 420,000, a decline of 34,000 from the previous week and the lowest weekly total since before the pandemic. New claims for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, a federally funded program for jobless freelancers, gig workers and others who do not ordinarily qualify for state benefits, totaled 93,500, a slight decline from the prior week. The figures are not seasonally adjusted.

  • New state claims remain high by historical levels but are less than half the level recorded as recently as early January. The benefit filings, something of a proxy for layoffs, have receded as business return to fuller operations, particularly in hard-hit industries like leisure and hospitality.

  • More than 20 Republican-led states have said they will abandon federally funded emergency benefit programs in June or early July, saying the income is deterring recipients from seeking work as some employers complain of trouble filling jobs. Those programs include not only Pandemic Unemployment Assistance but also extended benefits for the long-term unemployed.

  • In a separate report, the government on Thursday issued its second reading for U.S. growth in the first three months of the year. It said that the economy expanded by 6.4 percent in the first quarter, the same rate as reported last month.

California’ s CA Notify app is based on the Apple-Google software. About 65,000 people have used it to notify others of possible exposures to the virus.Credit…Paresh Dave/Reuters

When Apple and Google collaborated last year on a smartphone-based system to track the spread of the coronavirus, the news was seen as a game changer. The software uses Bluetooth signals to detect app users who come into close contact. If a user later tests positive, the person can anonymously notify other app users whom the person may have crossed paths with in restaurants, on trains or elsewhere.

Soon countries around the world and some two dozen American states introduced virus apps based on the Apple-Google software. To date, the apps have been downloaded more than 90 million times, according to an analysis by Sensor Tower, an app research firm. Public health officials say the apps have provided modest but important benefits.

But Natasha Singer of The New York Times reports that some researchers say the two companies’ product and policy choices have limited the system’s usefulness, raising questions about the power of Big Tech to set global standards for public health tools.

Computer scientists have reported accuracy problems with the Bluetooth technology. Some of the app users have complained of failed notifications, and there has been little rigorous research on whether the apps’ potential to accurately alert people of virus exposures outweighs potential drawbacks — like falsely warning unexposed people or failing to detect users exposed to the virus.

“It is still an open question whether or not these apps are assisting in real contact tracing, are simply a distraction, or whether they might even cause problems,” Stephen Farrell and Doug Leith, computer science researchers at Trinity College in Dublin, wrote in a report in April on Ireland’s virus alert app.

Read moreMs. Guzman and Vice President Kamala Harris with President Biden when he signed an extension of the Paycheck Protection Program in March.Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times

Isabella Casillas Guzman, President Biden’s choice to run the Small Business Administration, inherited a portfolio of nearly $1 trillion in emergency aid and an agency plagued by controversy when she took over in March. She has been sprinting from crisis to crisis ever since.

Some new programs have been mired in delays and glitches, while the S.B.A.’s best-known pandemic relief effort, the Paycheck Protection Program, nearly ran out of money for its loans this month, confusing lenders and stranding millions of borrowers. Angry business owners have deluged the agency with criticism and complaints.

Now, it’s Ms. Guzman’s job to turn the ship around. “It’s the largest S.B.A. portfolio we’ve ever had, and clearly there’s going to need to be some changes in how we do business,” she said in an interview with The New York Times’s Stacy Cowley.

“The S.B.A. needs to be as entrepreneurial as the small businesses we serve,”
she added. “What I really, truly mean by that is that a more customer-first approach.”

The S.B.A. is by far the smallest cabinet-level agency, with an annual operating budget that is typically less than half of what the Defense Department spends in a day. It was long viewed within the government as a sleepy backwater.

But when the pandemic sent unemployment claims soaring, Congress responded with a plan to give businesses money to keep their workers employed. Just seven days after President Donald J. Trump signed the $2.2 trillion CARES Act in late March 2020, the Small Business Administration began accepting applications for the Paycheck Protection Program.

Despite lots of speed bumps — including confusing, often-revised loan terms and several technical meltdowns — the program enjoyed some success. Millions of business owners credit it with helping them survive the pandemic and keep more workers employed.

Read moreWarehouses are sprouting up in fields in the Lehigh Valley, part of a boom driven by the area’s proximity to New York.Credit…Erin Schaff/The New York Times

In recent decades, the area in and around Pennsylvania’s Lehigh Valley has evolved from its agricultural and manufacturing roots to also become a health care and higher education hub.

Now there’s a new shift, The New York Times’s Michael Corkery reports.

Huge warehouses are sprouting up like mushrooms along local highways, on country roads and in farm fields. The boom is being driven, in large part, by the astonishing growth of Amazon and other e-commerce retailers and the area’s proximity to New York, the nation’s largest concentration of online shoppers, roughly 80 miles away.

But the warehouses are being built at such a dizzying pace that many residents worry the area’s landscape, quality of life and long-term economic well-being are at risk.

E-commerce is fueling job growth, but the work is physically taxing, does not pay as well as manufacturing and could eventually be phased out by automation. Yet the warehouses are leaving a permanent mark. There are proposals to widen local roads to accommodate the thousands of additional trucks ferrying goods from the hulking structures.

Developers are confident in the industry’s growth, however, particularly after the pandemic. Big warehouse companies like Prologis and Duke Realty are investing billions in local properties. Many of the warehouses are being built before tenants have signed up, making some wonder whether there is a bubble and if some of these giant buildings will ever be filled.

“People are calling it warehouse fatigue,” said Dr. Christopher R. Amato, a member of the regional planning commission. “It feels like we are just being inundated.”

But some, like David Jaindl, a third-generation farmer, said the concerns in the area about warehouses were unwarranted.

“They are certainly good for our area,” said Mr. Jaindl, who is developing land for several new warehouses. “They add a nice tax base and good employment.”

Manufacturing jobs in the Lehigh Valley pay, on average, $71,400 a year, compared with $46,700 working in a warehouse or driving a truck. The region is still home to large manufacturing plants that produce Crayola crayons and marshmallow Peeps candies.

Read more