Categories
Politics

Dealing with Subpoenas, Trump Allies Attempt to Run Out the Clock on Democrats

Adam B. Schiff, California Democrat and another member of the committee noted that the two House convictions of Mr Bannon and Mr Meadows were criminal cases. If the Justice Department decides to prosecute Mr Meadows like Mr Bannon, both men face imprisonment and fines.

“And that would be true regardless of who controls Congress,” said Schiff.

With the referral of Meadows disdain to the Justice Department, the US Attorney’s Office in Washington will decide whether charges are warranted, and Attorney General Merrick B. Garland will approve or reject their recommendation.

Key aspects of the January 6th investigation

Card 1 of 8

Mark meadows. House investigators said Mr Trump’s chief of staff played a far greater role than was previously known in the plans to turn down the elections. The House of Representatives voted to recommend that Mr. Meadows be detained in criminal contempt of Congress for defying the panel’s subpoena.

The PowerPoint document. The committee is reviewing a PowerPoint document of unknown origin filled with extreme plans to overturn the election. Mr. Meadows received the document in an email from an unknown sender and turned it over to the panel before ending its collaboration.

Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity and Brian Kilmeade. Fox News presenters texted Mr. Meadows during the Jan. 6 riot asking him to convince Mr. Trump to make an effort to stop him. The texts were part of the material that Mr. Meadows had given the panel.

The Willard Hotel. What happened before the uprising at the five-star hotel near the White House has become a primary focus of the panel pushing for responses to gatherings of Trump’s allies involved in the vote overturning the election.

In Mr Bannon’s case, the division moved relatively quickly, taking about three and a half weeks to decide that the contempt charge was warranted.

But the Meadows case is more complicated, legal experts say, in part because Mr Meadows had already submitted numerous documents to the committee, along with a list of documents he was withheld on privilege. Mr Meadows was an administrative officer while advising Mr Trump and his attorney has argued that as a former presidential advisor, he has immunity and is not required to testify.

The Department of Justice has long enforced broad immunity for close presidential advisers, said Jonathan D. Shaub, a law professor at the University of Kentucky who served in the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel.

Rep. Maxine Waters, a Democrat from California, suggested that Mr. Navarro could be next.

“If you fail to do so, we must accuse you of defying the summons,” she said. “We just have to do it.”

There is no doubt that the courts have been moving faster since the change in power in the White House Legal Department. In two separate judgments – the first in 2019, the second last month – judges said Trump’s White House must work with the House’s oversight demands. But the case lasted three and a half months two years ago when Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson released a 120-page statement to end the first phase. Just 23 days elapsed between Mr Trump’s motion to block publication of papers on January 6 and Judge Tanya Chutkan’s verdict against him in November.

Categories
Politics

U.S., allies warn extra terrorist assaults possible as Afghanistan withdrawal deadline nears

Afghans trying to leave the country continue to wait around Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan on August 26, 2021.

Haroon Sabawoon | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

The US and its allies have warned that further terrorist attacks are likely in Kabul as the deadline for military withdrawal from Afghanistan draws nearer.

Two suicide bombers struck on Thursday near the Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, where thousands of people are still hoping to be evacuated after the Taliban came to power.

The US Central Command confirmed on Thursday evening that 13 US soldiers were killed and 18 wounded. British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace said Friday that between 60 and 80 Afghans were also killed in the explosions.

ISIS-K, an Afghan-based branch of the terrorist group, has claimed responsibility for the attack.

The warnings came as the US and allies resumed evacuations from Kabul. About 12,500 were flown out in the 24-hour period that ended at 3 a.m. ET on Friday. Coalition forces have evacuated around 105,000 people in the past two weeks. Around 110,600 evacuations have been carried out since the end of July.

President Joe Biden said earlier this week that ISIS-K was a growing threat to the airport, adding that it was because of this that he was “so determined to limit the duration of the mission”.

U.S. Marine Corps General Kenneth McKenzie, Jr. said in a Pentagon briefing Thursday that ISIS will likely attempt to continue the attacks before the evacuations are complete.

On Friday, Wallace said the threat of further attacks in the area increases as the deadline for Western troops to leave the country draws nearer.

“The threat will obviously increase the closer we get to our exit,” he told Sky News. “The narrative will always be that certain groups like IS want to claim when they leave the US that they have driven the US or the UK.”

Wallace also shot at the Biden administration, saying that the West “seems to think that it is fixing problems; it is not, it is managing them”. He added that nation-building support should be carried out “in the long run as an international force”.

British forces evacuations ended

At around 4:30 a.m. on Friday, the UK approved the closure of its processing center at the Baron’s Hotel in Kabul and evacuated its officers. Wallace told BBC News that the last 1,000 eligible people at the airfield would be processed and flown out on Friday.

However, he admitted that not everyone can get out and told LBC radio that up to 150 UK nationals may not have made it yet as evacuation efforts are in their final hours.

Australia has suspended all evacuation flights from Afghanistan following the bombings, Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced on Friday, claiming it is no longer safe to continue evacuation.

Categories
Politics

Capitol Police Officers Sue Trump and Allies Over Election Lies and Jan. 6

A few weeks after the election, the lawsuit said, a key organizer of the stop-the-steal movement that was making false claims of electoral fraud, Ali Alexander, appeared at a rally outside the Georgia State Capitol with the leader of the Proud Boys, Enrique Tarrio. “We’ll stop the theft,” the suit quotes Mr. Alexander. “But first we will stop the certification.”

Mr Alexander’s attorney, Baron Coleman, has repeatedly said that his client is not being investigated in relation to the riot. Mr Tarrio was out of Washington on January 6, but was sentenced to five months in prison this week for possessing illegal weapons and burning a Black Lives Matter flag that came from a historic after a separate pro-Trump rally in December Stolen black church in Washington was also engulfed in violence.

The lawsuit mentions further steps on the way to January 6th: In late November, it is said, a California-based political organizer named Alan Hostetter, who believed the election had been stolen, posted a video on the Internet alleging it was stolen that people “at the highest level” are levels ”must“ be done with one or two or three executions, for example ”.

Mr. Hostetter, who was charged with conspiracy to storm the Capitol in June with members of the Three Percent Militia Movement, also said in the video that he will “return to Washington with a million patriots and we will encircle this city.” . “

On Jan. 6, the suit features a picture of stop-the-steal activists inciting the mob of Trump supporters gathered in Washington with lies about the election, which the president then repeated in a speech near the White House. Members of the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers and the Three Percenter movement are believed to have led the local mob in the attack on the Capitol.

Mr Trump, the lawsuit says, knew that “the situation in the Capitol was grim,” but did not condemn the rioters. Instead, two hours after the first violation, he posted a video repeating his lie that the election had been stolen and stolen, telling the attackers that he loved them.

Categories
World News

Sequence of U.S. Actions Left Afghan Allies Frantic, Stranded and Wanting to Get Out

WASHINGTON – Als Präsident Biden letzten Monat seine Entscheidung verteidigte, die US-Militärpräsenz in Afghanistan zu beenden, gab er den Afghanen, die ihr Leben riskiert hatten, um den amerikanischen Truppen zu helfen, ein Versprechen, das so alt wie der Krieg selbst war.

„Unsere Botschaft an diese Frauen und Männer ist klar: Es gibt ein Zuhause für Sie in den Vereinigten Staaten, wenn Sie dies wünschen“, sagte der Präsident. “Wir werden zu Ihnen stehen, so wie Sie zu uns standen.”

Aber seine Entscheidung, Anfang des Jahres keine Massenevakuierung afghanischer Dolmetscher, Reiseleiter und ihrer Angehörigen zu beginnen, hat Tausende von Menschen in der Schwebe zurückgelassen, die nach 20 Jahren Krieg in einem Land gestrandet sind, das jetzt von den Taliban kontrolliert wird.

Noch bevor Herr Biden den Abzug der US-Truppen ankündigte, lehnte seine Regierung verzweifelte Aufrufe von Gesetzgebern und Aktivisten ab, Afghanen zu evakuieren, die jetzt in Gefahr sind.

Dann in diesem Sommer flehte Afghanistans Präsident Ashraf Ghani Herrn Biden an, Evakuierungen bis zum endgültigen Abzug der US-Streitkräfte auszusetzen, da er befürchtete, dass das Image das Vertrauen in seine Regierung untergraben würde.

Herr Biden unternahm stattdessen Schritte, um ein von Rückständen geplagtes Visasystem zu rationalisieren, obwohl es nie für die Massenüberführung von Menschen in kurzer Zeit gedacht war. Und in den Vereinigten Staaten äußerten einige Beamte Bedenken über einen möglichen politischen Rückschlag wegen eines Flüchtlingszustroms.

Zusammengenommen ließen die Maßnahmen der Regierung das Versprechen von Herrn Biden am vergangenen Wochenende weitgehend unerfüllt und führten zu brennenden Szenen auf dem Flughafen von Kabul, in denen sich Afghanen an die Seiten abfliegender amerikanischer Flugzeuge klammerten. Und sie stellten die Frage, ob eine Regierung, die erklärt hat, den Menschenrechten im Ausland Vorrang einzuräumen, die Afghanen, von denen sie am meisten abhängt, im Stich gelassen hat, was das traditionelle globale Image der Vereinigten Staaten als Zufluchtsort für die Verfolgten trübt.

Der Präsident verteidigte am Mittwoch den Rückzug der USA und sagte, er sehe keinen Weg, Afghanistan zu verlassen, ohne dass „Chaos“ entsteht. In einem Interview mit ABC News wurde er gefragt, ob der Ausstieg besser hätte gehandhabt werden können.

„Nein, ich glaube nicht, dass es so hätte gehandhabt werden können, dass wir im Nachhinein zurückgehen und nachsehen werden – aber die Idee, dass es irgendwie einen Weg gibt, ohne Chaos herauszukommen, tue ich nicht wissen, wie das passiert“, sagte Herr Biden. “Ich weiß nicht, wie das passiert ist.”

Kritiker sagten jedoch, die Regierung sei direkt schuld.

„Das Versäumnis, unsere Verbündeten zu evakuieren, liegt allein in den Händen der Biden-Regierung, die Veteranen und Befürworter ignorierte, selbst wenn sie detaillierte Pläne zur Evakuierung auf US-Territorium vorlegten“, sagte Chris Purdy, der Projektmanager der Veteranen für das American Ideals-Programm bei Human Rights First.

Seit 2002 beschäftigen die Vereinigten Staaten Afghanen, um ihre Truppen, Diplomaten und Helfer zu unterstützen. Viele dieser Menschen wurden aufgrund ihrer Arbeit bedroht, angegriffen oder zur Flucht gezwungen, was den Kongress im Jahr 2009 veranlasste, ein Visumprogramm speziell für diejenigen, die der US-Regierung geholfen hatten, sowie deren unmittelbare Verwandte einzurichten.

Das Programm ist getrennt von dem Prozess, der normalerweise von denen verwendet wird, die vor Verfolgung oder Folter fliehen. Ungefähr 18.000 Menschen sind dabei, die Visa zu beantragen, und diese Antragsteller haben mindestens 53.000 Verwandte, die zu ihnen berechtigt wären. Trotz eines Mandats des Kongresses, dass die Vereinigten Staaten die Visa in neun Monaten bearbeiten, mussten Tausende mit langen Verzögerungen bei der Überprüfung konfrontiert werden.

Die Biden-Regierung hat nach Angaben des Außenministeriums seit Mitte Juli rund 2.000 der Antragsteller auf Militärstützpunkte evakuiert. Es bereitet die Evakuierung weiterer 800 vor.

In einer Reihe von Treffen und Telefonaten seit März, auch bevor Herr Biden den Rückzug der USA ankündigte, warnten Gesetzgeber und Umsiedlungsbeamte das Weiße Haus und das Außenministerium, dass die Situation eine dringende Reaktion erfordert – eine, die mit dem Sondervisum nicht angegangen werden kann Programm, das laut Umsiedlung und ehemaligen Regierungsbeamten, die unter der Bedingung der Anonymität gesprochen haben, zu lange dauerte, um interne Diskussionen zu beschreiben.

Das spezielle Visaprogramm verlangt von den Antragstellern, dass sie umfangreiche Prüfungen bestehen und ihre Arbeit nachweisen – Dokumente, die für Familien, die gezwungen sind, aus ihrer Heimat zu fliehen, schwer zu bekommen sein können. Die Biden-Regierung hat die vorherige Regierung dafür verantwortlich gemacht, die Verzögerungen durch „extreme Überprüfungsanforderungen“ zu verschlimmern.

Die Rufe nach schnellen Evakuierungen wurden laut, als die Biden-Regierung zusätzliches Personal in Washington und in der Botschaft in Kabul entsandte, um die Rückstände zu beseitigen. Ein Beamter sagte, die Verwaltung habe die Bürokratie durchbrochen, indem sie die Bearbeitungsverzögerungen halbiert habe, die sich bei Amtsantritt von Herrn Biden auf durchschnittlich zwei Jahre beliefen, und den Kongress dazu drängte, die Anzahl der Visa zu erhöhen und auf die Anforderungen für ärztliche Untersuchungen zu verzichten.

Doch selbst unter besten Umständen ist die Überprüfung von Flüchtlingen enorm zeitaufwändig. Die Aussicht, dass Tausende von afghanischen Flüchtlingen in die Vereinigten Staaten – und nicht in andere Länder – kommen, löste bei einigen Regierungsbeamten Bedenken aus, die argumentierten, dass dies das Weiße Haus für politische Rückschläge öffnen würde, so Regierungsbeamte und andere mit der Gegenstand.

Aktualisiert

August 18, 2021, 8:17 Uhr ET

Einige Gesetzgeber, wie der Abgeordnete Matt Rosendale, Republikaner von Montana, haben Bedenken hinsichtlich einer Beschleunigung des Überprüfungsprozesses geäußert.

„Wir werden jetzt ein Verfahren entwickeln, mit dem wir Tausende von Personen untersuchen und einfach in die USA umsiedeln können?“ sagte er in einem Interview. „Sobald sie sich hier eingelebt haben, können sie weitere Familienmitglieder hierher bringen. Eine gute Tat macht keinen Verbündeten.“

Afghanen – insbesondere Frauen und Mädchen – zurückzulassen, könnte für Herrn Biden erhebliche politische Auswirkungen haben.

„Der Tag, an dem sie beginnen, Frauen in Afghanistan zu töten: Das ist ihr politischer Albtraum“, sagte Michael A. McFaul, Professor für internationale Studien an der Stanford University und ehemaliger Botschafter in Russland während der Obama-Regierung. „Diese Zahlen, die den Rückzug unterstützen, sind unglaublich weich. Wenn Frauen, die Geld von USAID genommen haben, verhaftet oder getötet werden, wird diese Unterstützung schnell abnehmen und die Menschen werden über den Präsidenten empört sein.“

Flüchtlingsanwälte sagen, dass die Opfer der Afghanen für die Vereinigten Staaten jedes potenzielle politische Risiko überwiegen sollten, das mit Massenumsiedlungen einhergeht.

„Es ist ziemlich reich, wenn man bedenkt, dass wir diesen Leuten genug vertraut haben, um das Leben der US-Streitkräfte in ihre Hände zu legen, sie aber nicht auf US-Boden zu bringen“, sagte Becca Heller, die geschäftsführende Direktorin des International Refugee Assistance Project, das mit der State Department, um den Afghanen zu helfen.

In den Tagen, seit die Taliban die Kontrolle über Afghanistan übernommen haben, hat Herr Biden zusätzliche 500 Millionen US-Dollar für „unerwarteten dringenden Flüchtlings- und Migrationsbedarf von Flüchtlingen, Konfliktopfern und anderen aufgrund der Situation in Afghanistan gefährdeten Personen“ bewilligt.

Die Regierung rief auch in der gesamten Regierung nach Freiwilligen, die bei der Bearbeitung der afghanischen Visa helfen. Eine E-Mail der United States Citizenship and Immigration Services beschrieb die Gelegenheit als „außergewöhnliche Initiative“ und ermutigte jeden Mitarbeiter in jeder Position, sich zu bewerben.

Die Taliban-Übernahme in Afghanistan verstehen

Karte 1 von 5

Wer sind die Taliban? Die Taliban entstanden 1994 inmitten der Unruhen nach dem Abzug der sowjetischen Truppen aus Afghanistan 1989. Sie setzten brutale öffentliche Strafen ein, darunter Auspeitschungen, Amputationen und Massenhinrichtungen, um ihre Regeln durchzusetzen. Hier ist mehr über ihre Entstehungsgeschichte und ihre Bilanz als Herrscher.

Wer sind die Taliban-Führer? Dies sind die obersten Anführer der Taliban, Männer, die jahrelang auf der Flucht, untergetaucht, im Gefängnis und amerikanischen Drohnen ausgewichen sind. Sie tauchen jetzt aus der Dunkelheit auf, aber über sie oder ihre Regierungspläne ist wenig bekannt.

Die beiden obersten Führer des Pentagon sagten am Mittwoch, dass die Vereinigten Staaten sich verpflichtet haben, alle Amerikaner zu evakuieren, die Afghanistan verlassen wollen, sowie Afghanen, die bei den Kriegsanstrengungen geholfen haben und für die Einreise in die Vereinigten Staaten freigegeben wurden.

„Wir beabsichtigen, diejenigen zu evakuieren, die uns seit Jahren unterstützen, und wir werden sie nicht zurücklassen“, sagte General Mark A. Milley, der Vorsitzende der Joint Chiefs of Staff, gegenüber Reportern. “Und wir werden so viele wie möglich rausbringen.”

Bei einer Pressekonferenz jedoch würden weder General Milley noch Verteidigungsminister Lloyd J. Austin III Amerikanern, Afghanen und anderen Ausländern außerhalb des Umkreises einen sicheren Durchgang zum Flughafen garantieren.

„Die Kräfte, die wir haben, konzentrieren sich auf die Sicherheit des Flugplatzes“, sagte Austin. “Ich habe nicht die Möglichkeit, die Operationen derzeit nach Kabul auszudehnen.”

Die Regierung hat darauf bestanden, dass ihre Handlungen in den letzten Monaten kalkulierte Entscheidungen und keine Fehltritte waren.

Sie stützte sich auf Geheimdienstinformationen, die belegen, dass eine Übernahme durch die Taliban 18 Monate entfernt war, und Beamte haben eingeräumt, dass sie das Tempo des Taliban-Vormarschs unterschätzt haben, als sie überlegten, ob Evakuierungen durchgeführt werden sollten. Viele Afghanen standen kurz vor dem Ende der Visa-Pipeline, was den Beamten ein falsches Gefühl gab, dass die Regierung genügend Zeit hatte, sich weiterhin auf das Visaprogramm zu verlassen.

Die Regierung hat auch die Bitte von Herrn Ghani im Laufe des Sommers betont, Evakuierungen so lange aufzuschieben, bis die Amerikaner Afghanistan verlassen haben.

„Die afghanische Regierung und ihre Unterstützer, darunter viele der Menschen, die jetzt ausreisen wollen, haben sich leidenschaftlich dafür eingesetzt, dass wir keine Massenevakuierungen durchführen sollten, damit wir nicht das Vertrauen in die Regierung verlieren“, sagte Jake Sullivan, der nationale Sicherheitsberater, sagte bei einer Pressekonferenz im Weißen Haus am Dienstag. “Unsere signalisierte Unterstützung für die Regierung hat die Regierung offensichtlich nicht gerettet, aber dies war ein wohlüberlegtes Urteil.”

Die Regierung zögerte monatelang, die Afghanen auf Militärstützpunkte in den Vereinigten Staaten oder ihren Territorien wie Guam zu verlegen, und zog es vor, sie stattdessen in andere Länder zu verlegen, so Regierungsbeamte und Personen, die mit den Beratungen des Weißen Hauses und des Außenministeriums vertraut waren. Viele der Evakuierten hätten während der Bearbeitung ihrer Visa nur vorübergehenden Schutz. Wenn ihnen das Visum verweigert würde, müssten sie in den USA Asyl oder eine andere Form des Schutzes beantragen – Einwanderungsprogramme, die die Republikaner ergriffen haben, um Herrn Biden anzugreifen.

„Sie befinden sich im Grunde in den Vereinigten Staaten, und es gibt keinen wirklich effektiven Weg, um effektiv nein zu sagen“, sagte Barbara L. Strack, eine ehemalige Leiterin der Abteilung für Flüchtlingsangelegenheiten bei Citizenship and Immigration Services während der Regierungen Bush und Obama . „Die Regierung macht sich Sorgen über die ‚Nein‘-Fälle.“

Ein ehemaliger Bauunternehmer für die Vereinigten Staaten, der aus Jalalabad umgesiedelt wurde, schlenderte am Montagnachmittag ziellos vor einer Wohnanlage im Osten von Maryland und machte sich mit seiner neuen Umgebung vertraut.

Der Mann, der aus Angst um seine Sicherheit nur als Masoon identifiziert werden wollte, sagte, er habe es nach einem 20-stündigen Zwischenstopp auf der Militärbasis Fort Lee in Virginia von Kabul nach Maryland geschafft. Obwohl er mit seiner Frau und seinen fünf Kindern wohlbehalten ankam, blieben seine Eltern und Schwestern in Dschalalabad.

„Ich bin hier sehr glücklich“, sagte Masoon, „aber mit meiner Familie bin ich nicht glücklich.“

Er fügte hinzu: „Die Taliban sind in Dschalalabad, und was kann ich in dieser Situation tun? Es ist wirklich eine gefährliche Sache.”

Masoon sagte, er habe seit seiner Abreise aus Afghanistan vor weniger als zwei Wochen jeglichen Kontakt zu ihnen verloren.

Eileen Sullivan, Jennifer Steinhauer, Michael D. Shear, Eric Schmitt, Catie Edmondson und Lara Jakes steuerten die Berichterstattung aus Washington bei.

Categories
Politics

McCarthy threatens to drag GOP members from Home Jan. 6 committee after Pelosi rejects Trump allies Jordan and Banks

U.S. Speaker of the House Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks during a weekly news conference at the U.S. Capitol July 1, 2021 in Washington, D.C.

Alex Wong | Getty Images

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy threatened Wednesday to withdraw all his picks for the select committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol invasion unless House Speaker Nancy Pelosi reinstates the two Republicans she rejected.

Less than an hour earlier, Pelosi announced that she had vetoed GOP Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio and Jim Banks of Indiana, two of McCarthy’s five picks, from participating in the House probe of the deadly attempted insurrection by a mob of former President Donald Trump’s supporters.

Pelosi, D-Calif., said in a statement she made that decision “with respect for the integrity of the investigation” and “with an insistence on the truth and with concern about statements made and actions taken by these Members.”

On the same day of the Jan. 6 invasion, in which hundreds of Trump’s supporters broke into the Capitol to try to stop President Joe Biden’s election certification, both Jordan and Banks had voted to object to the results of the election.

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

McCarthy, R-Calif., in a statement called Pelosi’s move “an egregious abuse of power” and accused her of being “more interested in playing politics than seeking the truth.”

“Unless Speaker Pelosi reverses course and seats all five Republican nominees, Republicans will not be party to their sham process and will instead pursue our own investigation of the facts,” McCarthy said.

Jordan, a staunch Trump ally and the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, in a brief statement said Pelosi’s actions show that her Jan. 6 probe “is nothing more than a partisan political charade.”

Banks in his own statement said Pelosi “is afraid of the facts.”

“We said all along that this was a purely partisan exercise by the Democrats and Nancy Pelosi’s rejection of me and Jim Jordan shows once again she is the most partisan figure in America today,” Banks said.

But Pelosi earlier this month had picked a Republican — Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming — one of her eight members on the panel. 

The Democratic-led House set up the select committee after Senate Republicans blocked a bill that would have created an independent commission to investigate the attack. Six GOP senators voted to move forward with the legislation.

Pelosi’s statement Wednesday said she told McCarthy that she would appoint the other three Republican nominees to the panel, and “requested that he recommend two other Members” to replace Jordan and Banks.

When asked at the Capitol why she rejected the two Republicans, Pelosi told NBC News, “January 6th.”

McCarthy had selected Banks to serve as the top Republican on the 13-member panel.

McCarthy’s other picks included Reps. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Kelley Armstrong of North Dakota and Texas freshman Troy Nehls. 

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

Categories
Politics

Spy Businesses Search New Afghan Allies as U.S. Withdraws

KABUL, Afghanistan – Western espionage agencies are evaluating and soliciting regional leaders outside the Afghan government who may be able to provide intelligence on terrorist threats long after US forces have withdrawn, according to current and former American, European and Afghan officials.

The effort marks a turning point in the war. Instead of one of the largest multinational military training missions of all time, informants and intelligence agencies are now being sought. Despite diplomats saying the Afghan government and its security forces will be able to hold their own, the move signals that Western intelligence agencies are focusing on the possible – or even probable – collapse of the central government and an inevitable return to civil war to prepare.

Court officials in Afghanistan recall the 1980s and 1990s when the country was controlled by the Soviets and then turned into a factional conflict between regional leaders. The West was often dependent on opposing warlords – and at times supported them financially through relationships that contradicted the Afghan people. As a result of these policies, the United States was often particularly indebted to brokers who had outrageously committed human rights abuses.

Candidates considered today for intelligence gathering include the son of Ahmad Shah Massoud, the famous Afghan fighter who led fighters against the Soviets in the 1980s and as head of the Northern Alliance against the Taliban for the following decade . The son – Ahmad Massoud, 32 – has tried in recent years to revive his father’s work by assembling a coalition of militias to defend northern Afghanistan.

Afghans, American and European officials say there is no formal cooperation between Mr Massoud and Western intelligence, although some have held preliminary meetings. While there is widespread agreement within the CIA and the French DGSE that it could provide information, opinions differ as to whether Mr Massoud, who has not been tested as a leader, would be able to command an effective resistance.

The appeal of developing relationships with Mr Massoud and other regional energy brokers is obvious: Western governments distrust the Taliban’s lukewarm commitments to keep terrorist groups out of the country in the years to come, and fear that if they don’t, the Afghan government could collapse Peace settlement is achieved. The Second Resistance, as Mr Massoud now calls his armed insurgent force, is a network that opposes the Taliban, Al-Qaeda or any extremist group that emerges from their shadow.

Senior CIA officials, including William J. Burns, the agency’s director, have confirmed that they will be looking for new ways to gather information in Afghanistan once American forces have withdrawn and that their ability to gather information about terrorist activity will increase collect is restricted.

But Mr Massoud’s organization is still in its infancy, desperate for support and legitimacy. It is supported by around a dozen militia commanders who have fought against the Taliban and the Soviets in the past, as well as several thousand fighters in the north. Mr Massoud says his ranks are occupied by those who have been insulted by the government and, like the Taliban, believes that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has exceeded his greeting.

“We are ready, even if it takes my own life,” said Massoud in an interview.

Even the symbols at Mr. Massoud’s events are reminiscent of the time of the Civil War: old flags of the Northern Alliance and the old national anthem.

But despite all the excitement of Mr Massoud at the recent rallies and ceremonies, the idea that the Northern Alliance could be renamed and that its former leaders – some of whom have now become ambassadors, vice-presidents and senior military commanders in the Afghan government – would follow someone who is half his age and has little experience with war on the battlefield seems unrealistic right now, security analysts have said.

Supporting any kind of insurgency or building a resistance movement presents real challenges today, said Lisa Maddox, a former CIA analyst who has done extensive work on Afghanistan.

“The concern is what would the second resistance involve and what would our goals be?” She said. “I’m afraid people are proposing a new proxy war in Afghanistan. I think we learned that we can’t win. “

Even considering that an unproven militia leader for possible counter-terrorism assurances upon withdrawal of international forces is undermining the last two decades of state-building, security analysts say, practically turning the idea of ​​an impending civil war into an expected reality by further strengthening anti-government forces . Such divisions are widespread for exploitation by the Taliban.

The United States had a close relationship with the Northern Alliance, which made it difficult to gather information in the country. The French and British both supported high-ranking Massoud in the 1980s, while the Americans instead focused primarily on groups associated with Pakistani intelligence. CIA links with Mr. Massoud and his group were limited until 1996 when the agency began providing logistical assistance in exchange for information about al-Qaeda.

One of the reasons the CIA kept Massoud at bay was his track record of unreliability, drug trafficking, and war atrocities in the early 1990s, when Mr. Massoud’s forces shot at Kabul and massacred civilians as other warlords did.

Now different allied governments and officials have different views on Mr. Massoud and the viability of his movement. The French, who were devoted supporters of his father, see his efforts as promising to put up real resistance to the control of the Taliban.

David Martinon, the French ambassador in Kabul, said he had been watching Mr Massoud closely for the past three years and nominated him for a trip to Paris to meet with French leaders, including the president. “He’s smart, passionate, and a man of integrity who is dedicated to his country,” said Martinon.

Washington is more divided, and some government analysts do not believe Mr Massoud would be able to build an effective coalition.

Eighteen months ago, Lisa Curtis, then a National Security Council official, met with Mr. Massoud, along with Zalmay Khalilzad, the leading US diplomat who led peace efforts with the Taliban. She described him as charismatic and said he spoke convincingly about the importance of democratic values. “He’s very clear and talks about the importance of maintaining the progress made over the past 20 years,” she said.

In Afghanistan, some are more skeptical of Mr Massoud’s power to influence a resistance.

“Practical experience has shown that no one can be like his father,” said Lieutenant General Mirza Mohammad Yarmand, a former deputy minister in the Ministry of the Interior. “His son lives in a different time and does not have the experience that his father matured.”

Other members of the Afghan government see Mr. Massoud as a nuisance, someone who has the potential to create problems for his own interests in the future.

While opinions differ on his organizational skills, there is broad consensus that Mr Massoud can help act as eyes and ears for the West – as his father did 20 years ago.

Mr Massoud, who was trained at the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, UK, returned to Afghanistan in 2016. He spent the next three years quietly building support before becoming more public in 2019 through rallies and recruiting campaigns across the north.

In recent months, Mr Massoud’s rhetoric has grown tougher when he recently attacked Mr Ghani during a ceremony in Kabul and his efforts to secure international support became more aggressive. Not only has Mr. Massoud reached the US, UK and France, but also courted India, Iran and Russia, according to people familiar with his activities. Afghan intelligence documents show that Mr Massoud is buying weapons from Russia through an intermediary.

But Europe and the United States see him less as a bulwark against a rising Taliban than as a potentially important observer of al-Qaeda and the Islamic State. A generation ago, Mr. Massoud’s father was open about the burgeoning terrorist threats in the country. And even if the son cannot command the same armed forces as his father, he may be able to issue similar warnings.

As a young diplomat, Mr Martinon recalls Massoud’s late warning to the world during his visit to France in April 2001.

“What he said was caution, caution,” recalled Mr. Martinon. “The Taliban are hosting Al-Qaeda and preparing something.”

Julian E. Barnes reported from Washington. Najim Rahim and Fatima Faizi reported from Kabul.

Categories
Politics

Biden enterprise allies assist White Home woo non-public sector in local weather change push

President Joe Biden’s allies in business have helped the White House persuade the private sector to support the government’s climate change agenda.

Several business leaders working with the White House told CNBC that the effort is a huge departure from what they saw during the Trump administration.

For example, executives say they are less concerned about a tweet from the president when trying to push a new climate policy. Former President Donald Trump was known for targeting companies that appeared to oppose him on key issues.

“There is no longer any fear of the tweet, which I believe was a legitimate fear for many business leaders to speak up on these issues,” said Hugh Welsh, president of DSM North America, of which the group is CEO Climate Dialogue, said CNBC on Monday.

Biden has proposed a more aggressive climate policy than his predecessor. Trump pulled the US out of the Paris Climate Agreement in 2017 and, among other things, repealed the Obama-era regulations for methane gas, which could ultimately harm the environment. Biden reintroduced the US to the Paris Climate Agreement on his inauguration day.

Biden has also made tackling climate change a key part of his $ 2 trillion infrastructure plan. Biden’s proposal calls for a $ 174 billion investment in the electric vehicle market. It’s all part of the president’s goal to bring the country to net zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Tom Steyer, a billionaire who ran for president during the Democratic primary, is among several business leaders who have actively involved the White House and government leaders in their climate proposals.

Steyer spoke with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and White House climate advisor Gina McCarthy about the need to work with the private sector on what is likely to be one of the president’s most expensive initiatives, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter.

Steyer spent millions to defeat Trump and has invested in climate change initiatives. He has a net worth of $ 1.4 billion, according to Forbes.

Steyer was also a speaker at Morgan Stanley’s annual climate change conference. Steyer told executives and investors at the meeting that they shouldn’t invest in fossil fuel companies to fight climate change.

This person declined to be called to discuss private matters. Morgan Stanley representatives have not returned requests for comment. The White House did not respond to a request for comment prior to publication.

The Chamber of Commerce and the CEO Climate Dialogue have also engaged the White House in climate initiatives. The chamber rejects Biden’s plan to increase corporate taxes, but supports an infrastructure overhaul.

The CEO Climate Dialogue has nearly two dozen members, including companies from Wall Street and the energy sector. The organization aims to promote private sector use and a more market-oriented approach to secure net zero emissions by 2050.

Climate Dialogue’s CEO Welsh told CNBC that the group had contacted the White House in Biden to improve relationships with corporate executives.

“The group was involved with Gina McCarthy and a few others to rebuild relationships with the White House after the last four years,” said Welsh.

Marty Durbin, president of the US Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute, told CNBC the group had contacted McCarthy and Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm.

Durbin said the chamber was trying to encourage Granholm and members of Congress to fully fund climate-based research and development projects. The group has also tried to encourage the new administration to work with the private sector on green policy proposals.

“We need to figure out how we can enable the private sector to fund, use and commercialize these technologies. That is how we will see emissions reductions at the end of the day,” said Durbin.

Members of a fundraising group called Clean Energy for Biden also act as a bridge to the private sector. Dan Reicher, co-chair of the organization, told CNBC that he had prepared a spending proposal to increase energy production from the country’s dams.

The document, which was sent to the White House and approved by nearly a dozen organizations and trade associations, states that only 2,500 of the roughly 90,000 dams in the US generate electricity. The proposal is valued at over $ 60 billion over 10 years.

“If this $ 63.07 billion proposal is fully implemented over a 10-year period, around 500,000 well-paying jobs will be created, more than 32,000 kilometers of rivers restored to improve climate resilience, and more than 80 gigawatts of existing ones secure renewable hydropower and 23 gigawatts. ” Electricity storage “, it says in the proposal.

It also called on Biden to order the establishment of a committee to vote on dam improvements and regulatory issues.

According to Reicher, the draft was sent to Phil Giudice and David Hayes, two of Biden’s climate policy advisors and members of Congress, among others.

The Clean Energy for Biden group is evolving into 501 (c) (3) and 501 (c) (4) nonprofits, both of which are referred to as Clean Energy for America, Reicher added.

The Clean Energy for America website states that while Biden’s climate change agenda is supported, it will also “support candidates at the federal, state and local levels by fundraising, mobilizing the workforce for clean energy, and providing early resource availability.”

Categories
Business

OPEC and Its Allies Agree toGradual Will increase in Oil Manufacturing

OPEC and its allies, including Russia, announced on Thursday that they would gradually increase oil production over the next three months.

By agreeing to modest increases in production, Saudi Arabia appears to have given in to pressure from Russia and other manufacturers to increase production. They want to capitalize on what they see as a likely growing global thirst for oil as economies grow slowly after a pandemic.

The group known as OPEC Plus has withheld eight million barrels from the market every day.

On that occasion, the Saudis decided to “follow the consensus of the members,” said Helima Croft, commodities strategist at RBC Capital Markets, an investment bank.

A call from the new US Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm on Wednesday to Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman, the Saudi oil minister, could also have had an impact, although the Saudi official denied that the oil markets had been discussed.

“We reaffirmed the importance of international cooperation to provide consumers with affordable and reliable sources of energy,” Ms. Granholm wrote on Twitter.

Under the agreement, OPEC Plus will increase production by 350,000 barrels per day in both May and June and by 441,000 barrels per day in July. Over the same period, Saudi Arabia will gradually roll out further cuts of one million barrels a day that it has made voluntarily.

Prince Abdulaziz said during a post-meeting press conference that OPEC Plus wanted to test the increase in production but would still be able to change plans if demand did not materialize.

“We can freeze; we can gain weight; we can lose weight, ”he said.

For the time being, the oil market has accepted the prospect of increases that would be less than 1 percent of global consumption per month. Larry Goldstein, an oil analyst with the Energy Policy Research Foundation, said the approach to easing the cuts was “very modest and conservative” and would tend to prop up prices in the coming months.

Ms. Croft also said OPEC’s willingness to increase production is seen as a vote of confidence in the recovery of the global economy.

Brent crude, the international benchmark, rose 2.6 percent to $ 64.26 a barrel on Thursday, while West Texas Intermediate crude rose 3 percent to $ 60.94 a barrel.

In business today

Updated

March 31, 2021, 6:27 p.m. ET

Prince Abdulaziz was the main vocalist for reluctance to increase production and warned of the risk of flooding a still weak market. Some analysts also say the Saudis are aiming for higher price levels.

In remarks at the beginning of the meeting, the prince appeared to be advocating maintaining current production restrictions, which keep an estimated eight million barrels of oil per day, or about 9 percent of global consumption, out of the market.

“The reality remains that the global picture is nowhere near uniform and the recovery is nowhere near complete,” said the prince, who chairs the group’s meeting known as OPEC Plus.

The reintroduction of a national lockdown by France announced on Wednesday underscores the ongoing doubts about the recovery from the pandemic and the rising number of cases in the United States.

However, other manufacturers, including Russia and the United Arab Emirates, have pushed for production to increase.

At the beginning of the meeting, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak, Co-Chairman of OPEC Plus, said the market has “improved significantly” since it met last month. He estimated that demand now exceeded supply by about two million barrels a day, a deficit that would lead to a rapid depletion of inventories and potentially higher prices.

Prince Abdulaziz emphasized that he had a good relationship with Mr Novak – a big difference from a year ago when the two countries clashed in a market-breaking price war.

“We talk to each other more often than to our own families,” said the prince.

Categories
Politics

U.S. Joins Allies to Punish Chinese language Officers for Human Rights Abuses

WASHINGTON – The United States on Monday imposed sanctions on top Chinese officials as part of a multinational effort to punish Beijing for human rights abuses against the largely Muslim Uighur minority that American officials have labeled genocide.

The penalties – in coordination with the European Union, the UK and Canada – come days after the Biden government’s heated encounter with Chinese officials in Alaska and will most likely heighten tensions between Washington and Beijing.

“Amid increasing international condemnation, the PRC continues to commit genocide and crimes against humanity,” Foreign Minister Antony J. Blinken said Monday in a statement referring to the People’s Republic of China.

“The United States reiterates its call on the PRC to end the suppression of predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and other ethnic and religious minorities in Xinjiang, including by releasing all those arbitrarily detained in detention centers and detention centers,” he added.

The United States sentenced Wang Junzheng, secretary of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Party Committee, and Chen Mingguo, director of the Xinjiang Public Security Bureau, for their roles in the detention and serious abuse of Uighur Muslims and other ethnic minorities in Xinjiang said the finance department.

The sanctions were imposed under the Global Magnitsky Act, which allows the executive branch to use economic penalties to punish officials from other nations for human rights violations. The action will freeze any assets these officials hold in the United States.

The US move came hours after the European Union, the United Kingdom and Canada imposed their own sanctions on Chinese officials and organizations for human rights abuses in Xinjiang. The European Union, along with the Xinjiang Public Security Bureau, reached out to four Chinese officials. The UK has done the same. Canada has not published the names of its destinations.

In response to the European Union’s action on Monday, Chinese officials imposed sanctions on 10 Europeans, including members of the European Parliament.

“This move, based on nothing but lies and disinformation, ignores and distorts facts,” said Zhao Lijian, a spokesman for China’s Foreign Ministry, in a statement condemning the European Union’s actions, adding that the efforts made “which severely affects China’s internal affairs” and “seriously undermines China-EU relations. “

Mr Blinken said the joint action was an effort by the United States to “work multilaterally to advance respect for human rights.” A joint statement by top diplomats representing the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom, among others, called for Beijing to “end and arbitrarily release its repressive practices against Uighur Muslims and members of other ethnic and religious minorities in Xinjiang and arrested . “

China’s crackdown on Uyghurs has included forced sterilization and the sending of hundreds of thousands – if not a million or more – to indoctrination camps to promote loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party and break adherence to Islam.

In a separate action on Monday, the United States, in coordination with the European Union, announced sanctions naming military officials and other units in Myanmar for their violent suppression of democratic protests.

US action against Beijing appears to be in line with the diplomatic vision of Mr Blinken and Jake Sullivan, National Security Advisor to President Biden, at their first face-to-face meeting with Chinese officials in Alaska last week. Mr Sullivan said the United States remained “divided” over the challenges facing the world’s two largest economic and technology powers.

The penalties also follow the Biden administration’s decision to impose sanctions on 24 Chinese officials for undermining democratic freedoms in Hong Kong, and are similar to the Trump administration’s strategy of using sanctions as a means to punish Chinese officials for violating human rights.

Omer Kanat, the executive director of the Uighur Human Rights Project, praised the coordinated efforts of many nations to punish Chinese officials.

“Unprecedented cooperation between governments like this will end the genocide,” Kanat said in a statement on Monday. “This is what Uyghurs have asked – the dam has broken and the reaction has finally begun.”

Ana Swanson contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Putin pushed Biden misinformation to Trump allies throughout election

Russian President Vladimir Putin will chair a meeting with members of the government in Moscow on February 5, 2020.

Aleksey Nikolskyi | Sputnik | Kremlin | Reuters

Russia and its leader, Vladimir Putin, approved intelligence services to promote misinformation about President Joe Biden through the U.S. media and people close to then-President Donald Trump in an effort to increase Trump’s election chances, a U.S. intelligence report said Tuesday.

Specifically, the report said that Putin was “in control of the activities of Adriy Derkach, a Ukrainian lawmaker who played a prominent role in Russia’s electoral influence”.

Derkach, who has ties to Russian intelligence, is known to have met with Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal attorney who spent months making discredited allegations against Biden and his son Hunter Biden.

The results are the second “key verdict” in the released National Intelligence Council report on “Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Election”.

That section states: “We evaluate that Russian President Putin authorized and conducted a number of Russian government organizations to influence operations aimed at denigrating President Biden’s candidacy and the Democratic Party to ex-President Trump support to undermine public confidence in the electoral process and exacerbate socio-political divisions in the US. “

“Unlike in 2016, we have not seen any sustained Russian cyber efforts to gain access to the electoral infrastructure. We have great confidence in our assessment. Russian state and electoral representatives, who all serve the interests of the Kremlin, have the US -Influences the public in a consistent manner, “the report said.

“A key element of Moscow’s strategy in this electoral cycle has been the use of officials associated with Russian intelligence to spread narratives of influence – including misleading or unfounded allegations against President Biden – on US media organizations, US officials and prominent US individuals, including some related parties, transferring former President Trump and his administration. “

This is the latest news. Check for updates again.