Categories
Entertainment

‘Within the Identical Breath’ Evaluation: Wuhan 2019, or When Normalcy Ended

When you hear about filmmakers in conflict zones, you may flash on countries like Syria or Afghanistan. The movies produced in theaters of war often follow a similar arc: The documentarian parachutes in to take stock of a catastrophe. The focus tends to be on rubble, blood and suffering — the spectacle. In her short, stellar career, the Chinese filmmaker Nanfu Wang has repeatedly returned to a less obvious conflict zone in which the war for proverbial hearts and minds mostly takes place through state propaganda.

Her latest, “In the Same Breath,” is a clear, razor-sharp look at the pandemic. And, as she did with her documentary “One Child Nation” (made with Jialing Zhang), Wang vividly fuses the political with the personal. In mid-January 2020, she flew to China with her toddler to visit her family for the New Year, a trip the two had made before. (Born in China, Wang has lived in the United States for years.) Over images of fireworks exploding in the night sky, she ruefully says that “this was the last moment I can remember when life still felt normal.” And then she fills the screen with a rush of images: a blur of hospitals, X-rays, news reports and other visions from our Covid-19 world.

Back then, few — and certainly not Wang — knew that all normalcy was quickly disappearing when she briefly left her son with her mother, flying back to the States. The same day she flew out, China began shutting down Wuhan, the center of the outbreak. By isolating the city, China was trying to contain the virus and the pneumonialike respiratory disease it caused. At the same time, people elsewhere were traveling for the Lunar New Year’s celebration (chunyun), which is thought to be the biggest mass migration in the world, involving billions of trips. You know the rest of this story, or may think you do: There was no stopping the virus, though, as Wang suggests, it surely could have been attenuated.

Agilely marshaling a wealth of found and original material — as well as 10 camera people across China, some of whom remain anonymous — Wang brings you back to the first stages of the pandemic, before the Wuhan shutdown, before the virus had been officially named. She pulls out cellphone videos, collects news reports and finds some extremely eerie surveillance footage from inside a clinic in Wuhan. It’s unsettling, at times haunting, to watch people just going about their business, sometimes jammed together in celebration or just living their everyday, poignantly normal life, while others cough, stagger into emergency rooms and, in some distressing images, lie helpless in the streets.

Some of this will be familiar given the enormity of the disaster and its coverage. And there are moments here that recall the recent documentary “76 Days,” an immersive account of the Wuhan shutdown from inside the city. Yet Wang brings new insights to the crisis, and she manages to both surprise and alarm you. She also quickens your pulse, and not just through the brisk editing, notably during the short period when she’s separated from her child. But even after her husband safely brings their son home, a sense of profound urgency — and mystery — suffuses the movie as she toggles between the past and near-present, and revisits what was known and what was hidden.

To that end, as she has in her earlier work, Wang shrewdly and methodically homes in on China’s propaganda machine, showing how misinformation shapes ordinary life, how it defines a people’s consciousness of themselves and of the country. She is unrelentingly hard on its leadership. Nothing if not a crack dialectician, she repeatedly underscores the disconnect between what was happening on the ground in China, in hospitals and elsewhere, and how the government reacted to a situation that was spiraling out of its control. In speeches, conferences and smiling news reports, officials and their mouthpieces insisted that everything was fine. It was a message that, as Wang reminds you with crushing lucidity, American officials were sending to their people, too.

One of the attractions of Wang’s work is how she inserts herself into her movies in a way that never slides into solipsistic narcissism. Rather, she uses her own history and identity — as a daughter and as a mother, as a Chinese national and as an American transplant — to open up other histories and identities, telling stories that are invariably greater than any one person.

If “In the Same Breath” — the title becomes more resonant with each new scene and shock — were simply about China and its handling (mishandling) of the pandemic, it would be exemplary. But the story that she tells is larger and deeper than any one country because this is a story that envelops all of us, and it is devastating.

In the Same Breath
Not rated. Running time: 1 hour 35 minutes. Watch on HBO platforms.

Categories
Health

China orders Wuhan mass testing, Beijing restrictions as Covid delta spreads

Residents of Wuhan city in China’s Hubei province queue to take nucleic acid tests for Covid-19 on August 3, 2021.

STR | AFP | Getty Images

China is facing pockets of resurgence in major cities from Beijing to Wuhan, and authorities have imposed mass testing and widespread travel restrictions in some areas.

Daily Covid-19 cases are rising again as the delta variant spreads across the country.

China’s National Health Commission said it confirmed 96 Covid cases on Wednesday — the third straight day it reported 90 cases and above. Of the newly confirmed cases, 71 were locally transmitted, said the health commission.

Economists are concerned that a strict government clampdown on movements could hurt the economy — the only major economy to grow last year.

“China has shown before that it is willing to take tough action to control Covid, and we don’t doubt that it will do so again this time,” Robert Carnell, regional head of Asia-Pacific research at Dutch bank ING, said in a note on Wednesday.

“Tough restrictions on movement and travel already in place will likely bring the desired results. But the delta variant is a particularly slippery little critter, and the concern for us, and we imagine, many others, is how quickly this will occur, and at what economic cost in the meantime,” he added.

Read more about China from CNBC Pro

When Covid-19 first emerged in the country in late 2019, authorities used strict lockdowns and mass testing to control the nationwide outbreak.

Since then, Chinese authorities have clamped down hard on any flare-ups in Covid infections. The latest spread of the more transmissible Covid delta variant has again led authorities to tighten containment measures across the country.

State media Xinhua News Agency reported that authorities have urged people to limit travel and avoid gatherings, as well as suspended some flights, trains and long-distance bus services.

The capital of Beijing imposed strict entry and exit controls on Sunday and is said to be at a “critical stage” of epidemic control after cases rose late July for the first time in months, Xinhua reported.

Wuhan city, where the coronavirus first emerged, will test all its residents for Covid new cases emerged, the news agency said.

As of July 20, more than 17 million doses of Covid vaccines have been administered in Wuhan, and the vaccination rate of those 18 years and above hit 77.63%, according to the Wuhan municipal health commission.

‘Slow patch’ in China’s economy

China’s economic recovery has been uneven, with exports-oriented sectors driving most of the growth while domestic consumption has been slower to return.  

The resurgence in Covid-19 infections and the latest containment measures would delay a recovery in Chinese household spending, said Sian Fenner, lead Asia economist at consultancy Oxford Economics.

“The geographical spread of the delta variant is going to be concerning the Chinese authorities. We’ve already seen that they have a very low tolerance towards, you know, even a relatively small flare up,” she told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia” on Wednesday.

“We had hoped that with the increase in vaccination rates, that would actually improve that service consumption, but it looks like we’re in for another sort of slow patch going forward and … the delayed recovery in household spending,” she added.

Fenner said she’s maintaining her full-year growth forecast of 8.4% for China for now. That’s slightly higher than the International Monetary Fund’s projected growth of 8.1% in China.

— CNBC’s Weizhen Tan contributed to this report.

Categories
Health

Republicans name for Fauci’s termination over shifting place on Wuhan lab funding

Dr. Anthony Fauci is facing increasing calls from Republican lawmakers for his termination over what they say is a shift in his position on whether the U.S. government funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Fauci, the chief medical advisor to the White House, told lawmakers Tuesday that the National Institutes of Health funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology through the nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance with $600,000 over a period of five years. Funding to the nonprofit was eventually halted by the NIH.

He denied that the funding was specifically used for so-called gain of function research, which is altering a virus to make it either more transmissible or deadly to better predict new pathogens and ways to fight them.

On Wednesday during a Senate hearing, Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., further questioned Fauci’s faith in the Wuhan lab’s scientists. “How do you know they didn’t lie to you and use the money for gain of function research anyway?” Kennedy asked Fauci.

Fauci said there was no way to guarantee that the scientists and grantees did not lie. “You never know,” he said.

He added that scientists at the lab are “trustworthy” and that he would expect they complied with the conditions of the grant, which was to study the transmission of coronaviruses from bats to humans to better understand the SARS-CoV-1 epidemic in the early 2000s.

“I don’t have enough insight into the Communist Party in China to know the interactions between them and the scientists,” Fauci said when asked whether the Chinese government influences its scientists. He also said he has no way of knowing the influence of the Chinese government on the World Health Organization after Kennedy implied that the WHO is in the pocket of the Chinese government.

President Joe Biden announced Wednesday that he has ordered a closer intelligence review of what he said were two equally plausible scenarios of the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic — that it originated in a lab or from an animal. The director of national intelligence previously agreed that the two scenarios are equally likely.

Biden revealed that he tasked the intelligence community earlier this year with preparing “a report on their most up-to-date analysis of the origins of Covid-19, including whether it emerged from human contact with an infected animal or from a laboratory accident.”

“As of today, the U.S. Intelligence Community has ‘coalesced around two likely scenarios’ but has not reached a definitive conclusion on this question,” Biden said in a statement.

Federal health officials maintain that it is more likely that the virus has a natural origin, but do not exclude a lab leak as a possibility.

Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, recently introduced the Fauci Incompetence Requires Early Dismissal Act, which called for Fauci’s termination.

“Dr. Fauci represents everything that President Eisenhower warned us about in his farewell address: the scientific-technical elite steering the country toward their own ends,” Davidson said in a statement.

The Republican lawmakers also said they believe Fauci misled the American people early in the pandemic in regard to mask guidance. Fauci said in early March 2020: “Right now in the United States, people should not be walking around with masks.” He later clarified he meant that masks should be prioritized for health workers, but Republican lawmakers maintain that Fauci lied.

GOP lawmakers also claim that Fauci misled Americans when he said there would be an explosion of coronavirus cases after Texas lifted its mask mandate.

“It is long past time for Dr. Fauci to stop talking to the American public. Fauci should resign or be fired immediately,” said Rep. Guy Reschenthaler, R-Pa.

Correction: Warren Davidson, R.-Ohio, is a member of the House of Representatives. An earlier version misstated his title.

Categories
Health

Scientists Don’t Need to Ignore the Wuhan ‘Lab Leak’ Concept, Regardless of No New Proof

As scientists find more animal coronaviruses, they can recognize more and more pieces of SARS-CoV-2 spread out among them. Researchers have also been able to reconstruct some of the evolutionary steps by which SARS-CoV-2 evolved into a potential human pathogen while it was still infecting animals.

This pattern is probably one that’s been followed by many viruses that are now major burdens on human health. H.I.V., for example, most likely had its origin in the early 1900s, when hunters in West Africa got infected with viruses that infected chimpanzees and other primates.

But some scientists thought it was too soon to conclude something similar happened in the case of SARS-CoV-2. After all, the coronavirus first came to light in the city of Wuhan, home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where researchers study dozens of strains of coronaviruses collected in caves in southern China.

Still, that a top lab studying this family of viruses happens to be located in the same city where the epidemic emerged could very well be a coincidence. Wuhan is an urban center larger than New York City, with a steady flow of visitors from other parts of China. It also has many large markets dealing in wildlife brought from across China and beyond. When wild animals are kept in close quarters, viruses have an opportunity to jump from species to species, sometimes resulting in dangerous recombinations that can lead to new diseases.

That lab’s research began after another coronavirus led to the SARS epidemic in 2002. Researchers soon found relatives of that virus, called SARS-CoV, in bats, as well as civet cats, which are sold in Chinese markets. The discovery opened the eyes of scientists to all the animal coronaviruses with the potential of spilling over the species line and starting a new pandemic.

Virologists can take many measures to reduce the risk of getting infected with the viruses they study. But over the years, some accidents have happened. Researchers have gotten sick, and they’ve infected others with their experimental viruses.

In 2004, for example, a researcher at the National Institute of Virology in Beijing got infected with the coronavirus that causes SARS. She passed it on to others, including her mother, who died from the infection.

Categories
Politics

Biden orders nearer evaluation of Covid origins as U.S. intel weighs Wuhan lab leak concept

Security personnel stand guard outside the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan as members of the World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus make a visit to the institute in Wuhan in China’s central Hubei province on February 3, 2021.

Hector Retamal | AFP | Getty Images

WASHINGTON – President Joe Biden on Wednesday announced that he has ordered a closer intelligence review of what he said were two equally plausible scenarios of the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Biden revealed that earlier this year he tasked the Intelligence Community with preparing “a report on their most up-to-date analysis of the origins of Covid-19, including whether it emerged from human contact with an infected animal or from a laboratory accident.”

“As of today, the U.S. Intelligence Community has ‘coalesced around two likely scenarios’ but has not reached a definitive conclusion on this question,” Biden said in a statement.

“Here is their current position: ‘while two elements in the IC leans toward the former scenario and one leans more toward the latter – each with low or moderate confidence – the majority of elements do not believe there is sufficient information to assess one to be more likely than the other,” said the president.

Biden used the Intelligence Community’s traditional language when they provide assessments to a president. This includes explaining to the president when different agencies within the IC disagree, and always giving the president the level of confidence they have in the accuracy of the raw intelligence.

Biden issued the new directives as the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, still officially unknown, come under increasing scrutiny.

The hypothesis that the virus may have escaped from a laboratory, while initially dismissed by some as a conspiracy theory, has in recent months gained more mainstream traction.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky last week said in Senate testimony that a lab-leak origin “certainly” was “one possibility.”

White House officials told reporters Tuesday that China hasn’t been “completely transparent” in the global investigation into the origins of Covid-19, and that a full investigation is needed to determine whether the virus that’s killed almost 3.5 million people came from nature or a lab.

“We need to get to the bottom of this, whatever the answer may be,” White House senior covid-19 advisor Andy Slavitt told reporters at a covid briefing Tuesday. “We need a completely transparent process from China, we need the [World Health Organization] to assist in that matter and we don’t feel like we have that now.”

The World Health Organization said in March that it was “extremely unlikely” that the virus was introduced to humans through an accidental lab leak. But that report was heavily criticized by scientists who said the WHO gave the possibility of a lab accident short shrift compared with a natural-origin scenario..

“The report lacks crucial data, information, and access. It represents a partial and incomplete picture,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said at the time when asked about WHO’s stance on Covid’s origins.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which leads the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies, did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., did not immediately respond to CNBC.

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

—- CNBC’s Kevin Breuninger and Amanda Macias contributed to this story.

Categories
Health

U.S. ought to dig deeper into concept that Covid originated in a Wuhan lab, ex-Clinton official says

The U.S. should play a bigger role in getting to the bottom of the theory that Covid-19 first leaked from a virology lab in Wuhan, China, Atlantic Council senior fellow Jamie Metzl told CNBC on Monday.

“Right now the World Health Assembly is meeting and the United States should do everything possible with our allies to demand a full investigation into the origin of Covid with full access to all records, samples and staff in China and beyond,” said Metzl former national security officer in the Clinton administration, said in The News with Shepard Smith.

“If China wants to turn its nose to the rest of the world despite more than 3 million deaths, let them make that statement,” he said.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Monday that the determination of the origin of Covid-19 is subject to an international investigation by the World Health Organization and that the U.S. cannot conduct its own investigation.

Metzl organized a group of scientists and academics last year to call for a deeper investigation into the origins of Covid. He told host Shepard Smith that it was “critically important” to find answers to the causes of the pandemic, because if we do not, everyone would be “unnecessarily at risk”.

The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

A previously unpublished US intelligence report found that researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology were seeking treatment in hospital after an illness, “with symptoms consistent with both Covid-19 and common seasonal illnesses,” the Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday and quoted from the report.

The World Health Organization has repeatedly said that the virus most likely jumped from bats to humans through another animal. It has described the theory that the virus leaked from a laboratory as “extremely unlikely” but has not ruled it out. Metzl said he thought the theory was a “likely hypothesis”.

“Why should there be a bat coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan and not in southern China where the horseshoe bats are? And what we know they are in Wuhan is China’s only level 4 virology institute with the largest in the world Collection of bats coronaviruses that did aggressive research to make these pathogens more dangerous, “Metzl said.

Categories
Health

WHO outlines Wuhan findings on origins of Covid pandemic

Peter Ben Embarek and Marion Koopmans (R) come to a press conference on February 9, 2021 to conclude a visit by an international team of experts from the World Health Organization (WHO) to the city of Wuhan in the Chinese province of Hefei.

HECTOR RETAMAL | AFP | Getty Images

An international team of scientists led by the World Health Organization said Tuesday that the search for the introduction of the coronavirus was still in progress. Further research is needed to investigate how and whether the disease circulated in animals prior to human infection.

Scientists have been working in the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the disease was first identified, for four weeks, looking for clues to the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The research team has visited hospitals, laboratories, and markets including the Huanan Seafood Market, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the laboratory of the Wuhan Center for Disease Control.

During the secret visit, researchers were also supposed to speak to early responders and some of the early patients. The team completed two weeks of quarantine before starting visiting local locations.

Dr. Peter Ben Embarek, WHO food safety and animal diseases specialist and chairman of the investigation team, told a press conference that the “most likely” path for Covid is to transition from an intermediate species in humans. That hypothesis will “require more study and more specific (and) targeted research,” he said.

The first results of the investigation found no evidence of major Covid outbreaks in Wuhan or anywhere else before December 2019. However, researchers found evidence of wider Covid spread outside the Huanan seafood market in the same month, Ben Embarek said.

He added that it was not yet possible to determine the intermediate animal host for the coronavirus and described the results as “in the works” after nearly a month of meetings and site visits.

“To understand what happened in the early days of December 2019, we dramatically changed the image we had before? I don’t think so,” said Ben Embarek.

“Have we improved our understanding? Have we added details to this story? Absolutely,” he said.

WHO has tried to meet expectations for a definitive conclusion on the origins of the Covid pandemic. To put the mission in a broader context, it took more than a decade to find the origins of SARS, while the origins of Ebola – first identified in the 1970s – are not yet known.

It is hoped that information on the earliest known cases of the coronavirus, first discovered in Wuhan in late 2019, can help pinpoint the start of the outbreak and prevent similar pandemics in the future.

After concerns about access and delays in issuing visas, the team led by the World Health Organization arrived in Wuhan on January 14 to work with Chinese scientists to investigate the origin of the coronavirus.

Laboratory leak “extremely unlikely”

A theory that the coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been discredited by the research team. The hypothesis had been upheld by former President Donald Trump’s administration without any burden of proof and was strictly denied by Chinese officials.

“The hypothesis of a laboratory incident is extremely unlikely to explain the introduction of the virus into the human population,” said Ben Embarek. “Hence, it is not in the hypotheses that we will propose for future studies.”

Liang Wannian, head of the Covid expert panel at the Chinese National Health Commission, said on Tuesday, alongside Ben Embarek of the WHO from the Hilton Optics Valley Hotel in Wuhan, he agreed with this assessment.

The team had concluded that a laboratory leak should be considered extremely unlikely “on the basis of serious discussion and very careful research,” he added.

Mink are seen on a farm in Gjol, Northern Denmark on October 9, 2020.

HENNING BAGGER | Ritzau Scanpix | AFP via Getty Images

Liang said ongoing research into the origins of the virus needs to focus on how the virus circulated in animals before humans were infected.

Animal hosts have yet to be identified, but bats and pangolins are both potential candidates for transmission, Liang said, but samples from these species have not been found “sufficiently similar” to the Covid virus.

The high susceptibility of minks and cats to the Covid virus suggests that there may be other animals that act as reservoirs, Liang continued, but research is currently insufficient.

China’s national health commission spokesman said there could have been an unreported spread of the coronavirus before it was first discovered in Wuhan. However, Liang said there was no evidence of significant spread of Covid in Wuhan prior to the outbreak in late 2019.

International concern

The WHO previously cited genetic sequencing that showed the coronavirus had started in bats and likely jumped to another animal before infecting the human.

Many of the people who contracted the new virus in Wuhan, a city of around 11 million people, are said to have had connections to the Huanan fish market.

Scientists initially suspected the virus came from wildlife sold in the fish market, which prompted China to swiftly restrict public access to the market early last year.

China’s CDC has since said samples from the fish market suggest that the virus has spread from where the outbreak first occurred.

Additionally, China’s Liang said Tuesday that the Huanan Fish Market was one of the places where the coronavirus first appeared. However, he added that with current evidence it is impossible to determine how the virus was first introduced to the fish market.

Security guards stand guard outside the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan as members of the World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus visit the institute in Wuhan, central China’s Hubei Province, on February 3, 2021.

HECTOR RETAMAL | AFP | Getty Images

The origins of the coronavirus remain important as the virus is constantly evolving, as demonstrated by highly infectious mutant strains in the UK and South Africa.

To date, more than 106 million people worldwide have contracted the coronavirus and it has caused at least 2.32 million deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University.

The US has by far reported the highest number of confirmed Covid cases and deaths, with more than 27 million reported infections and 465,072 deaths.

China has released little information about its research into the origins of the coronavirus, and there has been widespread international concern about what researchers in Wuhan are allowed to see and do as part of their research.

– CNBC’s Evelyn Cheng contributed to this report.

Categories
Health

W.H.O. consultants investigating the origin of the virus go to a lab in Wuhan.

A team of experts from the World Health Organization studying the causes of the pandemic visited a research center in Wuhan, China on Wednesday that has been the subject of several unsubstantiated theories about the coronavirus.

WHO scientists met with staff at the center, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which houses a state-of-the-art laboratory known for its research on coronaviruses.

The institute came under scrutiny last year when the Trump administration advocated the unsubstantiated theory that the virus may have leaked from a government-run laboratory in China. But many high-ranking American officials have privately said that evidence suggesting a laboratory accident is primarily circumstantial.

Most scientists agree that the coronavirus most likely occurred in nature and spread from animals to humans. Peter Daszak, one of the experts on the WHO team, described the conversation on Wednesday at the Wuhan Institute as open. “Important questions asked and answered,” he wrote on Twitter, without giving details.

One of the people the WHO team met was Shi Zhengli, known as China’s “bat woman” for her study of coronaviruses found in bats. In June, Dr. Shi first voiced fears that the virus may have leaked from the lab, according to an interview with Scientific American. Later checks showed that none of the gene sequences matched the viruses examined by the staff.

Separately, China announced on Wednesday that it would provide 10 million Covid-19 vaccines to Covax, a global body promoting equitable access to coronavirus vaccinations.

The decision is “another important step China has taken to promote fair distribution of vaccines,” said Wang Wenbin, a foreign ministry spokesman.

He also said the World Health Organization has started reviewing emergency vaccine approval. It was unclear what vaccines Mr. Wang was referring to. Two vaccines – manufactured by Chinese companies Sinovac and Sinopharm – have been approved for use in China.

Categories
Health

W.H.O. Group in Wuhan to Hint Coronavirus

More than a year after a new coronavirus first emerged in China, a team of experts from the World Health Organization arrived in downtown Wuhan on Thursday to look for its source.

Research by the team of 10 scientists is a crucial step in understanding how the virus jumped from animals to humans so that another pandemic can be avoided. Getting answers will most likely be difficult.

The Chinese government, known to have no outside control, has repeatedly obstructed the team’s arrival and investigation. Even in the best of circumstances, a full exam can take months, if not longer. The team must also steer China’s attempts to politicize the investigation.

Here’s What You Should Know About Investigation.

Visa delays. Quarantine rules. Political stone wall.

Apparently concerned about redirecting attention to the country’s early mistakes in dealing with the pandemic, Chinese officials used various tactics over the past year to obstruct the WHO’s investigation.

After China resisted demands from other nations to allow independent researchers on its soil to investigate the pathogen’s origin, China finally invited two WHO experts to visit in July to lay the foundations. Then the team was immediately quarantined for 14 days and its members forced to do some of their detective work remotely.

They were not allowed to visit Wuhan, where the virus first appeared.

China delayed approval of a full team of experts for a visit for months, frustrating health department leaders. When the visit appeared to be completed earlier this month, it fell apart at the last minute when Beijing failed to provide visas for visitors, according to the health department. Dr. World Health Organization director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus issued a rare reprimand against Beijing at a press conference, saying he was “very disappointed” with the delays.

The Chinese government has requested that Chinese scientists oversee key parts of the investigation. It has restricted the global health agency’s access to key research and data. The entire WHO team must be quarantined in Wuhan for two weeks before they can start sleeping.

Critics say Beijing’s desire for control means that the investigation will most likely be more political than scientific.

“They want this investigation to be thorough, non-politicizable, independent and transparent,” said Yanzhong Huang, senior fellow on global health at the Council on Foreign Relations. “But we have to be realistic.”

Despite the problems, the WHO intends to conduct a rigorous and transparent study.

“From the outset, WHO made a commitment to investigate the origins of the virus,” Tarik Jašarević, a spokesman for the agency, said in a statement. “We call on all countries to support these efforts through openness and transparency.”

The team, which has arrived in Wuhan, according to official broadcaster CGTN, will be faced with a city that has changed radically since the virus first appeared in late 2019. The city, which was locked down on January 23 last year and became the symbol of the virus’s devastation, stopped a year later by Chinese officials as a success story in overcoming the virus – a city reborn.

Updated

Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:11 AM ET

WHO experts have decades of experience in research into viruses, animal health and disease control. They come from the UK, Germany, Japan, Russia, the US and other countries. Peter Daszak, a British disease ecologist, and Hung Nguyen, a Vietnamese scientist studying zoonotic diseases, are among the team members.

However, finding the source of the virus, which has killed nearly two million people worldwide and infected more than 92 million as of Thursday, will be arduous. While experts believe the virus came naturally from animals, possibly bats, little else is known.

The team is expected to investigate the earliest reported cases of the virus in China and, most likely, to examine data from samples collected in a sprawling wet market in Wuhan that sold game meat and live animals. Many of the first reported infections have been traced there.

How much access the team in China gets will be crucial, according to public health experts.

You should be able to review all of the data collected by the Chinese Center for Disease Control on the outbreak, “including contact tracing, environmental sampling, genetic sequences and patient zero identification,” said Raina MacIntyre, director of biosecurity programs at the University of New’s Kirby Institute South Wales in Sydney, Australia. “It is important to do this comprehensively and transparently.”

The health department has not specified how long the examination will take, nor has published a detailed itinerary for the team’s visit.

Marion Koopmans, a Dutch virologist on the WHO team, said the study was a “long-term project”.

“We will summarize and discuss all the scientific information that has already been collected by our colleagues in China:” What does this tell us? “She said in a recent interview with CGTN, the Chinese international broadcaster.” Is there any information we’d like to add? How could that be done? “

The pandemic has damaged China’s reputation, and many foreign governments are still angry that Beijing did nothing more to contain the crisis at its earliest stages. Chinese propagandists are therefore trying to use the WHO investigation to strengthen China’s image and portray the country as a mature superpower.

“China is open, frank and righteous,” Xinhua, the official news agency, said in a comment on the investigation on Wednesday.

The WHO itself has also been under attack by the Trump administration for appearing to bow to the will of China, despite criticism of the United States for its ineffective response to the pandemic. Before the team landed, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Twitter Tuesday, “The @WHO has been corrupted and bought cheap by China’s influence. WHO investigators still have no access to Wuhan – a year after the first cases were reported? “

On the same day, Global Times, a national tabloid, wrote that the upcoming visit showed that China “has always sought to contribute to the global fight against the pandemic with a transparent, responsible attitude and a spirit of respect for science.”

The Chinese government has tried to advance unsubstantiated theories that the virus emerged outside of China. Chinese scientists have suggested with no evidence that packaged foods from overseas could have brought the virus to China or that the pandemic could have started in India.

The heated political climate will make it difficult for WHO to conduct an independent investigation, experts say.

“The main concern here is that the origin of the outbreak has been so politicized,” said Huang, the global health expert. “That has really limited the space for independent, objective and scientific investigation of the WHO.”

Albee Zhang and Claire Fu did research.