Categories
Politics

Jim Jordan texted Mark Meadows argument for Mike Pence to reject Biden electoral votes

Rep. Jim Jordan, Republican of Ohio on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.

Saul Loeb | Pool via Reuters

Republican MP Jim Jordan conveyed a message to then White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows arguing that Vice President Mike Pence should reject certain Electoral College votes on Jan. 6 during the confirmation of Joe Biden’s presidential win over Donald Trump.

The text, which NBC News confirmed Wednesday was broadcast from Jordan, was one of several messages to Meadows a House special committee publicly shared this week as it pursued criminal disdain for Trump’s former chief of staff.

The text was written by Joseph Schmitz, a former Pentagon inspector general and former Trump campaign aide, and passed on to Meadows by Jordan, a source told NBC News. Schmitz could not be reached immediately to comment.

The message said that on Jan. 6, Pence was due to “cast all votes which he believed to be unconstitutional as there were no votes at all,” alleging that such an act would be consistent with “judicial precedence” and “guidance from.” Founding father Alexander Hamilton “stand. “

The legally questionable argument that Pence could unilaterally invalidate or deny a state’s votes was rejected by Pence himself, despite Trump urging him to do so.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

Schmitz’s argument, relayed by an incumbent member of Congress to the president’s chief adviser, reveals how Trump’s allies at all levels exchanged ideas about how the outcome of the democratic elections could be changed.

Jordan is a staunch ally of Trump who worked alongside Meadows in the conservative House Freedom Caucus. The Ohio legislature was one of dozen of Republicans in the House of Representatives who voted to challenge election results that favored Biden after the rioters were evacuated from the Capitol.

Jordan spokesmen did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request to comment on the text sent to Meadows.

The special committee is tasked with investigating the facts and causes of the deadly invasion of January 6, when hundreds of Trump supporters forcibly stormed the Capitol and forced Congress to flee their chambers. Many of the rioters were spurred on by Trump’s false claims that the 2020 elections had been “rigged” against him by widespread electoral fraud.

The House of Representatives voted Tuesday night to hold Meadows for disregarding Congress for defying the summons of the selected panel to request dismissal. The committee says Meadows created thousands of pages of records and agreed to answer questions before abruptly pulling back. Meadows has sued the selected panel for invalidating two of his subpoenas, arguing, in part, that Trump exercised executive privilege over his testimony.

The committee this week revealed some of Meadows’ records, including texts he received from Jordan and other lawmakers. They also shared messages sent to Meadows by Donald Trump Jr. and several pro-Trump Fox News presenters, who panicked over the Capitol uprising as it unfolded.

“He must condemn this s — as soon as possible. The Capitol Police’s tweet is not enough, ”Trump Jr. wrote to Meadows on Jan. 6, said Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., Vice chair of the special committee, during a meeting Monday night.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Read part of Jordan’s message to Meadows at the meeting without naming Jordan as the sender.

“On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, was supposed to call all votes that he deems unconstitutional because there were no votes at all,” reads the text, which was sent to Meadows by a person who only described Schiff as “Legislator”.

An accompanying graphic displayed this quote as a full sentence. Jordan’s office argued to NBC that Schiff misrepresented the message because it omitted some of the language Jordan sent to Meadows.

A select committee spokesman told CNBC that the graphic “accidentally” added a period to the end of the quote Schiff read during the meeting. “The special committee is responsible for the mistake and regrets the mistake,” said the spokesman.

The spokesman sent the full text messaging record “in the interests of transparency” to CNBC.

It states: “On January 6, 2021, Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call all votes that he deems to be unconstitutional, as there are no votes at all – according to the instructions of Founding Father Alexander Hamilton and ‘No legislative act,’ wrote Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 78, ‘may be valid against the Constitution.’ The Hubbard v. Lowe affirmed this truth: “That an unconstitutional law is not a law at all is no longer up for discussion.” 226 F. 135, 137 (SDNY 1915), appeal dismissed, 242 US 654 (1916). Because of this, an unconstitutional elector, like an unconstitutional law, is not a voter at all. “

Categories
Politics

Home Democrats to carry votes on Biden financial plans

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) will hold a press conference at the US Capitol Visitor Center on March 19, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

The House of Representatives will return to Washington next week preparing the latest test of President Joe Biden’s sprawling economic agenda.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, California, plans to hold a procedural vote as early as Monday to move forward with a handful of Democratic priorities: the $ 1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill passed by the Senate, the $ 1 trillion Democratic Plan $ 3.5 trillion to expand the social safety net and a voting law.

She will then work with the Senate to pass a budget resolution, which is the first step in getting the Democrats to approve their massive spending plan without a Republican vote.

The spending plan is not expected to get through the Senate for weeks or even months, which would delay the final passage of the infrastructure bill if everything goes according to plan.

In an effort to keep the progressives on board with the smaller infrastructure plan and keep the centrists in tune with trillions more new spending, Pelosi has announced not to adopt either of the economic plans until the Senate passes both of them. Opposition from their faction has threatened to derail the speaker’s plans so that the Democrats will look for a way forward if they return to the Capitol.

A group of nine centrist Democrats in the House of Representatives on Monday reiterated their call for the chamber to vote on the bipartisan infrastructure bill before considering spending on social programs and climate policy. With Democrats holding a slim majority in the House of Representatives, the nine lawmakers could sink the budget decision themselves – which would delay progress on an economic agenda that Democrats hope will boost budgets and improve their fortunes in next year’s midterm elections .

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

It’s unclear whether Pelosi will change their plans before next week. The White House this week approved their strategy of holding the procedural vote to move forward with plans for infrastructure, welfare spending and voting rights and then passing the budgetary decision.

In a letter to her group this week, she said delays in passing the measure would jeopardize the party’s political goals.

“When the House of Representatives returns on August 23, it is important that we pass the budgetary decision so that we can move forward united and determined to realize President Biden’s transformative vision and make historic strides,” she wrote.

If Pelosi pulls off their plan, the infrastructure bill would wait for a final House vote – and then Biden’s signature – while both houses of Congress write the $ 3.5 trillion spending plan. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., gave committees a goal on September 15 to complete their pieces of legislation.

The bill is expected to include a Medicare expansion, a universal Pre-K, wider access to paid vacation and childcare, an expansion of strengthened household tax credits, and measures to encourage clean energy adoption. The proposal could be scaled back as Senate Democratic centrists including Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona criticize the $ 3.5 trillion price tag.

A Democratic vote against the proposal would sink him in the Senate, which is split 50:50 by party.

The nine Democrats in the House of Representatives have pushed for the final passage of the Infrastructure Bill, arguing that a later vote would delay projects to renew American traffic, broadband and infrastructure.

“We now have the votes to pass this bill, so I think we should first vote immediately on the bipartisan infrastructure package, send it to the president’s desk, and then quickly think about the budget resolution that I want to support.” New Jersey Rep. Josh Gottheimer, one of the nine Democrats, said in a statement Friday.

“We have to get people to work and shovel in the ground,” he said.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Health

Gibraltar Votes to Ease Abortion Restrictions

Gibraltar residents voted by a large majority on Thursday to relax one of the strictest abortion laws in Europe after an emotional campaign to lift a near-ban on the procedure and bring tiny British territory closer to British law.

In a referendum, about 62 percent of voters approved a change in the law to allow abortions within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy if a woman’s mental or physical health is judged to be at risk by a doctor, or later if a woman has severe fetal abnormalities.

Previously, Gibraltar law had only allowed abortions to save a mother’s life. The law provided for a potential criminal sentence of life imprisonment, although no such sentence has been imposed in recent history.

In contrast, UK law allows abortion in the first 24 weeks of pregnancy.

Parliament set the stage for the vote on Thursday in 2019 when it adopted language to relax abortion restrictions, which it passed to voters for approval. A referendum was originally planned for March 2020 but was postponed to Thursday due to the coronavirus pandemic.

Gibraltar, a territory of 34,000 at the tip of southern Spain, has retained some significant legal differences from the UK. But the Gibraltar Parliament kicked off the changes after the UK Supreme Court warned in 2018 that Northern Ireland’s ban on abortion was incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.

Keith Azopardi, an opposition politician who was against a relaxation of abortion restrictions, described the referendum campaign as “emotional and divisive”. The majority of Gibraltar’s residents are Catholics, and the Bishop of Gibraltar had spoken out against any relaxation of the abortion law.

The turnout among the 23,000 eligible voters in Gibraltar was 53 percent.

Fabian Picardo, the leader of the Gibraltar government, had supported the abortion changes. After casting his own vote Thursday, he retweeted a message from the London-based Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists saying that “restrictive abortion laws endanger women’s lives by forcing them to either leave the country or to access unsafe and illegal supplies ”. . “

Early on Friday morning, Mr. Picardo tweeted a “We did it!” Message and wrote that the government “will work on introducing the new services we need to provide counseling and safe and legal abortions”.

The changes will take effect in 28 days. Previously, the law in Gibraltar had resulted in women seeking an abortion usually traveling elsewhere, often to the UK and sometimes across the land border to neighboring Spain, where abortions were legalized under certain circumstances more than 30 years ago.

Great Britain secured control of Gibraltar in the Treaty of Utrecht in 1713, although Spain has long denied British sovereignty. In December negotiators struck a last-minute deal to prevent travelers and goods from being stranded on Gibraltar’s land border with Spain after the UK completed its exit from the European Union.

While British voters supported leaving the EU in a referendum in 2016, an overwhelming majority of voters in Gibraltar voted against the decision known as Brexit.

Categories
Politics

Home votes to repeal 2002 Iraq Conflict authorization

US President George W. Bush (L) speaks prior to signing the Joint Congressional Resolution to Authorize US Use of Force against Iraq if necessary, October 16, 2002, at the White House in Washington, DC. From L are House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL), Secretary of State Colin Powell and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

Joyce Naltchayan | AFP | Getty Images

The House of Representatives voted Thursday to revoke the 2002 war permit in Iraq as Congress seeks to limit the president’s discretion in the use of military force.

The chamber passed the measure by a margin of 268 to 161. Forty-nine Republicans backed them except for one Democrat.

The bill goes to the Senate, where the GOP is split over whether to support them. The Chamber’s Foreign Relations Committee plans to proceed next week with its own plan to revoke authorization for the use of military force.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

President Joe Biden supports the House Bill of Representatives to Repeal the Iraq War. His Office of Management and Budget said this week that “the United States has no ongoing military activities relying solely on the 2002 AUMF as its domestic legal basis, and repeal of the 2002 AUMF would likely have minimal impact on ongoing military operations to have.”

Legislators from both parties have feared that leaving the approval in place will give the presidents legal backing to justify independent military strikes. The Iraq war ended almost a decade ago.

The House of Representatives voted to lift the measure in January 2020 after the US launched an air strike in Iraq that killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani. The Senate, then held by Republicans, did not pass the bill. The Trump administration named the approval measure as the legal basis for the air strike.

(R) Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) hold a critical press conference at the U.S. Capitol on October 4, 2017 in Washington . Direct current.

Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

Rep. Barbara Lee, D-California, spearheaded legislation that the House of Representatives passed Thursday. Lee, a longtime anti-war advocate, was the only House MP who voted against the war permit in Afghanistan in 2001.

“This authority remains on the books and is prone to abuse as Congress failed to act to remove it,” Lee said in the House of Representatives on Thursday.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., said Wednesday that he would vote on revoking the Iraq warrant this year. He said the revocation of the permit would “remove the risk of a future government resorting to the legal dustbin to be used as a justification for military adventure”.

Minority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Signaled Thursday that he would oppose the war permit being lifted, despite support for his faction.

U.S. Army Soldiers from 1st Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, Task Force Iraq, man a defensive position on Forward Operating Base Union III in Baghdad, Iraq, December 31, 2019.

US Army | Reuters

“The fact is that the legal and practical application of the 2002 AUMF goes well beyond the defeat of Saddam Hussein’s regime,” he said. “To throw it aside without answering real questions about our own efforts in the region is reckless.”

Sens. Tim Kaine, D-Va., And Todd Young, R-Ind., Led efforts to overturn the measure in the Senate.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
World News

Israel Parliament votes in new authorities, ending Netanyahu rule

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

ABIR SULTAN | AFP | Getty Images

The Israeli parliament, the Knesset, approved its new government – and for the first time in 12 years a new prime minister – with a wafer-thin 60:59 votes on Sunday.

The vote that ushered in the leadership of a very diverse and cobbled together coalition of right, left, centrist and Islamist parties ousted Israel’s longest-serving leader, Benjamin Netanyahu. It also saves Israel the prospect of a fifth election in less than two years.

Now, after fighting back and trying several policy options to stay in power, Netanyahu will step aside and Israeli tech millionaire and lawmaker Naftali Bennett, whom many consider more right-wing predecessor, to take over as prime minister.

Sunday’s Knesset vote was shrouded in chaos and derision as some right-wing lawmakers, including those of Netanyahu’s Likud party, insulted Bennett, calling him a “traitor” and “liar” for the alliance with left and Arab parties. At least four politicians were kicked out of the meeting by spokesman Yariv Levin.

Bennett, a former Netanyahu adviser, continued his pre-vote speech amid the heckling heckling, praising Netanyahu as “working hard and faithfully for the State of Israel”. But he also pushed for the need for new leadership.

“We stopped the train at the edge,” said Mr. Bennett. “It is time for various leaders from all parts of the people to stop trying to stop this madness.”

In a statement, US President Joe Biden congratulated Bennett and other leaders of the new administration and cabinet.

“I look forward to working with Prime Minister Bennett to strengthen all aspects of the close and lasting relationship between our two nations. Israel has no better friend than the United States working closely together, and as we continue to strengthen our partnership, the United States remains steadfast in its support for Israel’s security. “

‘We’ll be back soon’

The 71-year-old right-wing leader is a lightning rod in its twelfth year and has long been a dividing line in Israeli society. An Israeli expert told CNBC that the country’s last elections in March – the fourth in less than two years due to the complex and polarized nature of Israeli politics – really came down to whether the country wanted “Bibi or no Bibi”. where the outgoing Prime was used became the minister’s popular nickname.

Speaking to the Knesset in English, Netanyahu said: “We’ll be back soon.”

“If we have to be in the opposition, we will keep this up – until we overthrow this dangerous government and return to run the state,” he said in a defiant address, saying he spoke for millions of Israelis who are for him have voted.

A combination of file photos shows Israeli Education Minister Naftali Bennett giving a speech in Jerusalem on May 14, 2018, and Yesh Atid Party leader Yair Lapid giving a speech in Tel Aviv, Israel, on March 24, 2021.

Ammar Awad; Amir Cohen | Reuters

He also slammed a bill proposed by the new government that would limit a prime minister’s term to eight years, four years less than his term in office.

Netanyahu himself faces several allegations of corruption, which he denies. He had been looking for ways to avoid prosecution, which would have been a lot easier if he had stayed in power. Meanwhile, he can still remain the leader of the Likud party.

The outgoing prime minister attracted international criticism and attention for his persistent military action against Gaza in May, in which Israeli air strikes killed more than 250 Palestinians, including 66 children, in response to rocket volleys by Hamas that killed Israel during course 12 of the fighting .

Future challenges

The new coalition that is now taking power is led by centrist lawmaker Yair Lapid, a former television presenter and former finance minister and head of the Yesh Atid party, and his unlikely government partner, Naftali Bennett, who leads the minority Yamina party.

It is very unusual for a minority party leader to become prime minister, but that was what it took Bennett to join Lapid’s coalition – and his alliance with Lapid was the only way the coalition could get enough Knesset seats to hold one To have majority.

So the deal for Lapid and Bennett is based on the agreement that Bennett will become Prime Minister by 2023, with centrist Lapid as Secretary of State. At this point, if the party alliance survives, Lapid will assume the office of prime minister.

It is also the first time in Israeli history that its government includes an Arab party that aims to represent the country’s 21% Arab minority.

The government is expected to focus on social and economic issues that foster consensus among its disparate members rather than divisive ones such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Palestinian statehood.

But there are serious challenges ahead. The fragile coalition between Lapid and Bennett and the parties whose support they had to win to achieve the magic number of a majority of 61 seats in the Knesset is a risk to itself, analysts say. The only thing that seems to hold them together is a shared desire to take Netanyahu off the bench. But because of the incredibly narrow majority of 61 seats in the 120-member parliament, it would only take one move for the government to collapse.

And in view of the sometimes extreme differences of opinion between the parties, especially between right-wing and Islamist politicians in Israel, this danger of standstill and collapse remains a constant threat.

Categories
Health

5 issues to know earlier than CDC panel votes on use in adolescents

A student receives her first Pfizer Biontech COVID vaccine at Ridley High School on May 3, 2021 as part of a clinic for students ages 16-18.

Pete Bannan | MediaNews Group | Daily times via Getty Images

A key CDC advisory body is due to vote on Wednesday on whether to recommend the use of Pfizer and BioNTech’s Covid-19 vaccine for children ages 12-15.

The widely awaited approval from the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices is the final step before US officials put their thumbs up on states to allow millions of teenagers to be vaccinated as early as Thursday.

Allowing teenagers to get the shots will accelerate the nation’s efforts to fight infection and return to some form of normalcy, say public health officials and infectious disease experts. It also allows states to vaccinate middle school students before summer camps start and school starts in the fall.

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention Panel meeting will take place two days after the Food and Drug Administration announced that it would approve Pfizer and BioNTech’s application to allow young teenagers to be vaccinated in an emergency. The vaccine is already approved for use in people aged 16 and over. It’s given in two doses three weeks apart in teenagers, the same regimen for 16 years and older, according to the FDA.

Here’s what to expect.

When do you vote?

According to a draft agenda, the meeting will take place from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. The vote usually takes place towards the end.

Prior to voting, medical experts will evaluate clinical trial data from Pfizer and BioNTech and provide their views on the vaccine, including whether the benefits outweigh the risks for use in adolescents. The companies announced in late March that the vaccine was 100% effective in a clinical study involving more than 2,000 adolescents. The side effects were generally consistent with those seen in adults, they added.

What happens next?

Dr. Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, told reporters Monday he expected the first shots for young teenagers to be given as early as Thursday until the panel is approved and approved by the CDC director.

The distribution of vaccines will be different across the US, officials told reporters, as states have different regulations about who can give shots to younger age groups. The Biden government has announced plans to send vaccines directly to pediatrician offices and make doses available in other locations such as community centers.

Is the Vaccine Safe?

In a statement on Monday, incumbent FDA commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock told parents that the agency “did a rigorous and thorough review of all available data” before clearing it for use on younger teenagers.

The FDA said the side effects in adolescents were consistent with those reported in clinical trial participants aged 16 and over. It was suggested that the vaccine should not be given to anyone who has had a history of severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, a severe and potentially life-threatening allergic reaction.

The most commonly reported side effects, according to the FDA, were pain at the injection site, joints and muscles, fatigue, headache, chills, and fever. With the exception of pain at the injection site, more teens reported side effects after the second dose than after the first, the agency said. The side effects usually lasted one to three days.

When do younger children get access?

Studies are currently being carried out to test Covid vaccines in children under the age of 12. However, researchers believe these studies will take longer as they gradually examine younger age groups and experiment with lower doses after the vaccines are shown to be safe in older children.

FDA approval for children under the age of 12 could come in the second half of this year. In a presentation to coincide with the company’s earnings release on May 4th, Pfizer expects to file for approval of its toddler vaccine in September and toddler vaccine in November.

Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, whose vaccines are approved for people aged 18 and over, are also testing their recordings in younger age groups.

Do children need recordings for school and activities?

Possibly. For example, schools can legally require that students be vaccinated, according to Dorit Reiss, a law professor at UC Hastings College of Law.

Several colleges and universities have already stated that they need Covid vaccinations for students returning in the fall. It is possible that vaccinations are required to participate in after-school activities such as sports, arts, and other personal activities after school.

The federal government is unlikely to prescribe vaccines for children or other groups, public health experts say.

The CDC has previously said schools can safely reopen without vaccinating teachers or students. Biden’s government has announced it will invest $ 10 billion in Covid testing for schools to accelerate the return to one-to-one tuition across the country this fall.

Categories
Politics

Republicans Received Blue-Collar Votes. They’re Not Providing A lot in Return.

Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri, a Republican, stated on Twitter, “We’re working class party now. That’s the future. “

And with further results showing that Mr. Trump had raised 40 percent of the union budgets and made unexpected strides among Latinos, other Republican leaders, including Florida Senator Marco Rubio, are trumpeting a political realignment. Republicans, they said, were hastening their conversion to Sam’s Club party, not the country club.

But since then, Republicans have offered very little to advance workers’ economic interests. Two important ways for party leaders to present their priorities have emerged recently without nodding to working Americans.

In Washington, Democrats, who are putting nearly $ 2 trillion in a stimulus package, are facing widespread opposition from Congressional Republicans to the package, which is full of measures that will benefit struggling workers a full year after the coronavirus pandemic began come. The bill includes $ 1,400 middle-income American checks with extended unemployment benefits due to expire on March 14.

At a high-profile, high-decibel Conservative meeting in Florida last weekend, potential 2024 presidential candidates, including Texas Hawley and Senator Ted Cruz, barely mentioned a blue collar agenda. They used their twists and turns in the national spotlight to stir up complaints about “culture breakup”, beat up the tech industry, and reinforce Mr. Trump’s false claims of a stolen election.

Inside and outside the party, critics see a familiar pattern: Republican officials, following Trump’s own example, harness the cultural anger and racial resentment of a sizable segment of the white working class, but have not made concerted efforts to help Americans economically.

“This is the Republican identity problem,” said Carlos Curbelo, a former Florida Republican Congressman, referring to the general opposition of the House Republicans to the stimulus plan devised by President Biden and the Democratic Congress. “This is a package that Donald Trump would most likely have supported as President.”

“Here’s the question for the Rubios and the Hawleys and the Cruzes and anyone else who wants to benefit from this potential new Republican coalition,” added Curbelo. “If you don’t take steps to improve people’s quality of life, they will eventually leave you.”

Some Republicans have tried to address the strategic problem. Utah Senator Mitt Romney proposed one of the most ambitious GOP initiatives aimed at fighting the Americans, a move to tackle child poverty by sending parents up to $ 350 per month per child. But other Republicans rejected the plan as “welfare”. Mr. Hawley has approved a Democratic proposal for a minimum wage of $ 15, with the caveat that it only applies to companies with annual sales above $ 1 billion.

Whit Ayres, a Republican pollster whose client included Mr Rubio, criticized the Democrats for failing to compromise on incentive after a group of GOP senators offered a smaller package. “Seven Republican senators voted to condemn a president of their own party,” he said, referring to Mr. Trump’s impeachment. “If you can’t put any of them on a Covid program, you’re not really making an effort.”

As the Covid-19 bailout package, which every Republican in the House of Representatives has rejected, finds its way through the Senate this week, Republicans are expected to come up with further proposals targeting the struggling Americans.

Mr Ayres said the Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, Florida, last weekend, the first major party convention since Mr Trump left, had been a spectacularly missed opportunity in failing to have a meaningful discussion of politics for workers pick up voters. Instead, the former president waged an intra-party civil war by naming a hit list of all Republicans who voted to indict him in his speech on Sunday.

“You should spend a lot more time developing an economic agenda that benefits workers than retrying a losing presidential election,” Ayres said. “The question is, how long will it take Republicans to find out that driving out heretics rather than attracting new converts is a losing strategy right now?”

Separately, one of the most famous worker uplifting efforts in the country was made this week in Alabama, where nearly 6,000 workers at an Amazon warehouse are voting on whether to unionize. On Sunday, the union-friendly workers were given a nudge in a video from Mr Biden. Representatives of Mr. Hawley, who was one of the leading Republican advocates of working class realignment, did not respond to a request for comment on where he stood on the matter.

The 2020 election continued a long-term trend with parties essentially swapping voters, with Republicans winning with workers while suburban white-collar workers headed for Democrats. The Sam’s Club Conservative idea, launched by former Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty about 15 years ago, recognized a constituency of populist Republicans who advocated higher minimum wages and government aid for families in difficulty.

Mr Trump noted a historic level of support for a Republican among white working class voters. But once in office, his greatest legislative achievement was a tax cut, with most of the benefits going to businesses and the rich.

Oceans of ink have been spilled on whether the white working class devotion to Mr Trump had more to do with economic fear or anger against “elites” and racial minorities, especially immigrants. For many analysts, the answer is that this has to do with both.

Its advancement of politics in favor of working class Americans has often been chaotic and unsolved. Manufacturing jobs, which had been slow to recover since the 2009 financial crisis, declined in the year before the Trump pandemic. The former president’s military trade war with China hit American farmers so hard economically that they received large rescue packages from taxpayers.

“There never was a program that looked at the types of displacement,” said John Russo, former co-director of the Center for Working Class Studies at Youngstown State University in Ohio.

He believes American workers will be worse off once the economy returns to pre-pandemic levels as employers accelerated automation and will continue the downsizing introduced during the pandemic. “Neither party is talking about it,” said Mr Russo. “I think this will be a key issue by 2024.”

It is possible that Republicans who do not prioritize economic issues read their rationale carefully. A poll by GOP pollster Echelon Insights last month found that the main concerns of Republican voters were mostly cultural: illegal immigration, lack of police support, high taxes and “liberal bias in the mainstream media.”

Despite Mr Biden’s campaign classifying him as “Bourgeois Joe” from Scranton, Pennsylvania, he made little progress as a candidate in supporting Mr Trump with non-college white voters, disappointing Democratic strategists and party activists. In exit polls, these voters preferred Mr. Trump to Mr. Biden by 35 percentage points.

Among non-college color voters, Mr Trump won one of four votes, an improvement over 2016 when he received one of five votes.

His efforts with Latinos in South Florida and the Rio Grande Valley, Texas shocked many Democrats in particular, and it spurred Mr. Rubio to tweet that the future of the GOP was “a party built on a multi-ethnic, multi-racial coalition of working AMERICANS. ”

After the Trump presidency, it is an open question whether other Republican candidates can win the same intensity of worker support. “Whatever your criticism of Trump – and I have a lot – clearly, he was able to connect with these people and they voted for him,” said Ohio Representative Tim Ryan, a Democrat from the Youngstown area.

Mr. Ryan is preparing to run for an open Senate seat in Ohio in 2022. He agrees with Mr. Trump regarding the takeover of China, but blames him for not following his harsh language with sustainable policies. “I think there is an opportunity to have a similar message but a real agenda,” he said.

As for Republican presidential candidates who want working-class supporters to inherit from Trump, Ryan saw poor prospects for them, especially if they continued to oppose the Biden stimulus package, which the House passed and is now before the Senate.

“The Covid-19 relief bill was aimed directly at workers’ struggles,” Ryan said, adding that Republicans who voted against the package “were facing a rude awakening.”

Maybe. A Monmouth University poll on Wednesday found that six in ten Americans support the $ 1.9 trillion package in its current form, particularly the $ 1,400 checks for those with certain income levels.

But Republicans who vote against may not pay a political price, said Patrick Murray, the poll’s director. “They know the checks will bottom out regardless, and they can continue to rail against democratic excesses,” he said.

“There would only be a problem if they somehow managed to cut the bill,” he added.

Categories
Politics

McConnell votes for acquittal however says ‘no query’ Trump accountable for riot

Minutes after the “not guilty” vote in Donald Trump’s impeachment proceedings, Senate Minority Chairman Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. Said the former president was clearly responsible for the deadly Capitol riot.

“There is no question that Trump” is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day, “said McConnell shortly after the Senate acquitted Trump of instigating the attack.” No question. “

But “the question is contentious,” said McConnell, because Trump, as a former president, “has no constitutional right to convict”.

“After much deliberation, I believe that the best reading of the Constitution shows that Article 2 Section 4 exhausts the group of people who can lawfully be tried, tried or convicted,” McConnell said.

“It’s the president, it’s the vice-president and civil servants. We have no power to convict a former incumbent who is now a private individual,” he said.

While 57 out of 100 senators found Trump guilty, the chamber fell below the two-thirds threshold required for a conviction. Seven Republican senators, along with all Democrats and Independents, voted to condemn Trump.

The House indicted Trump on January 13, a week before the end of his term in office, of an article on “incitement to rebellion.” The Democrats had pressured McConnell, who was the majority leader at the time, to quickly open a lawsuit before Trump left the White House. However, the trial itself didn’t begin until nearly three weeks after President Joe Biden was sworn in.

On Tuesday, 44 Republican Senators, including McConnell, voted that the Senate was constitutionally not even responsible for conducting a trial against a former president.

However, in his post-vote speech, McConnell endorsed the view that “President Trump is still liable for everything he did during his tenure”.

“He hasn’t gotten away with anything yet,” McConnell said, noting, “we have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil trials. And former presidents are not immune to being.” [held] accountable by both. “

McConnell, who previously stated that Trump provoked the crowd of his supporters who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, also pushed back some of the arguments made by Trump’s defense team during the trial.

“The problem is not just the moderate language spoken by the president on Jan. 6,” McConnell said, “but the whole atmosphere of impending disaster,” including “the increasingly fierce myths of a landslide election that was somehow stolen.”

Trump’s lawyers had argued extensively that what the former president had said at a pre-insurrection rally was an ordinary political speech protected by the First Amendment. McConnell argued, however, that other examples of cutting-edge political rhetoric “are different from what we’ve seen” than Trump.

Before McConnell spoke, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., railed against the Republicans who voted in favor of the acquittal.

“There was only one correct judgment in this process: guilty,” said Schumer.

“This was about electing a country before Donald Trump. And 43 Republican members voted for Trump,” said Schumer.

Categories
Politics

Home votes to drop Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from committee roles

The House voted Thursday to strip Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., From her committee duties as punishment for a laundry list of extreme views and conspiracy theories she advocated prior to taking office.

The vote was held by a margin of 230-199, with 11 Republican members on the side of the Democratic majority. No Democrats voted against the resolution.

The eleven Republicans who voted to remove Greene include: Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA), Rep. Chris Jacobs (NY), Rep. Carlos A. Giménez (FL), Rep. John Katko (NY), Rep. Young Kim (CA.), Rep. Adam Kinzinger (IL), Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (NY), Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (FL), Rep. Fred Upton (MI), Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart and Rep. Chris Smith (NJ) .

It was only hours after Greene stepped on the chamber floor to express regret over some of the marginal views she had spread, including the pro-Trump-QAnon conspiracy. She didn’t offer an apology.

Kevin McCarthy, Chairman of the Minority House, R-Calif., Had hoped to avoid the vote, which forced Republicans to give an opinion on the resolution aimed at condemning Greene’s behavior.

While few, if any, GOP members had openly defended Greene’s most controversial remarks – such as alleged support for the execution of top Democrats – some Republicans had argued against the trial, warning that the Democrats’ efforts to get Greene up would set a dangerous precedent. Other Republicans chose to attack Democrats for refusing to reprimand their own members for making fire testimonies in the past.

However, the Democrats claimed that Greene would be placed in a separate category because of her behavior and that she should be removed from the Budgets Committee and the Education and Labor Committee.

“If a person is encouraged to talk about shooting a member in the head, they should lose the right to serve on a committee,” said executive chairman Jim McGovern, D-Mass., On Wednesday before his committee approved the resolution to dismiss Greene from the committees.

“If this isn’t the bottom line, I don’t know where the hell the bottom line is,” said McGovern.

Greene had promoted a litany of other radical conspiracies and extreme statements prior to his election. She was reportedly skeptical of the conspiracy theory that a plane failed to hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. She reportedly suggested that some school shootings had occurred and mocked a survivor of the school massacre in Parkland, Florida. Media also reported that Greene suspected in 2018 that forest fires in California might have been caused by laser beams.

McCarthy spoke to Greene in a closed meeting Tuesday night. He then suggested to the Democrats that the GOP Greene would withdraw its duties as the education committee if it could remain on the budget committee, NBC News reported. Democrats turned down this offer.

“To do nothing would be a renunciation of our moral responsibility to our colleagues, the house, our values, the truth and our country,” said the majority leader of the house, Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Before the final vote on Thursday evening.

“Yesterday the Republican Conference decided not to do anything. So today the House has to do something,” said Hoyer.

Greene claims she recently spoke to Trump and has his support. Trump, who lost his race to President Joe Biden but never officially admitted it, retains overwhelming Republican support even after his supporters’ uprising in the U.S. Capitol, in which five people died.

But other prominent Republicans have been less supportive of Greene. Earlier this week, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Blew Greene’s “crazy lies and conspiracy theories” and called them “cancer for the Republican Party and our country.”

McCarthy said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that he “unequivocally” condemned Greene’s many controversial remarks on “school shootings, political violence and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories”.

He criticized the Democrats for sanctioning Greene and accused the majority party of a party political seizure of power.

McCarthy said he told Greene during a meeting Tuesday night that “as members of Congress, we have a responsibility to adhere to a higher standard”.

“Marjorie recognized that in our conversation. I keep her word,” said McCarthy in his statement.

Democrats, meanwhile, seem eager to showcase Greene as the GOP’s figurehead.

McCarthy has decided to make the House Republicans the “party of conspiracy theories and QAnon,” Pelosi said in a statement Wednesday, “and Rep. Greene is in the driver’s seat.”

“I remain deeply concerned about the acceptance of extreme conspiracy theorists by the Republican government,” Pelosi said at a press conference Thursday.

“Particularly troubling is their willingness to reward a QAnon supporter, a 9/11 Truther, a molester of school shootout survivors, for giving them valued committee positions, including – who could imagine them?” Person would join the education committee? “”

Categories
Politics

Trump pressures Georgia high election official to ‘discover’ votes and overturn Biden victory

In an exceptional phone call this weekend, President Donald Trump pressured Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State to overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the state by finding votes to shift the number in his favor, as received by NBC News.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger resisted pressure from Trump to change Georgia’s election results, even as the president made veiled threats of possible prosecution if denied. The call was made on Saturday.

Trump, who refused to allow the election, said during the call that he wanted to “find 11,780 votes” to change the outcome in Georgia.

He told Raffensperger, a Republican, that Georgia’s vote had dropped hundreds of thousands of votes and suggested that the Secretary of State announce that he had recalculated the numbers to show a Trump victory.

“Well, Mr. President, the challenge you have is the data you have is wrong,” Raffensberger replied, according to the record.

Raffensperger and the secretary’s general counsel, Attorney Ryan Germany, also pushed back on Trump’s claims that ballot papers had been destroyed or that Dominion had removed parts of voting machines in Georgia that were showing more Republican votes.

The contents of the phone call were first reported by the Washington Post.

Trump, referring to Saturday’s call in a tweet on Sunday morning, said Raffensperger could not answer his questions about alleged election fraud, saying, “He has no idea.” Raffensperger replied on Twitter, writing, “What you say is not true. The truth will come out.”

Bob Bauer, a senior adviser to President-elect Biden, slammed Trump’s actions in a statement on Sunday.

“We now have irrefutable evidence that a president is putting an official of his own party under pressure and threatening to induce him to overturn the legal, certified number of votes of one state and fabricate another in his place,” said Bauer. “It captures the whole, nefarious story of Donald Trump’s attack on American democracy.”

The Senate Minority Whip, Dick Durbin, D-IL, said in a statement that the call warranted a criminal investigation.

“President Trump’s taped conversation with Georgian Foreign Minister Raffensperger is more than a pathetic, rambling, delusional abuse. His shameful effort to intimidate an elected official into deliberately changing and misrepresenting the statutory votes in his state strikes in the heart of our democracy and deserves nothing less than a criminal investigation, “the statement said.

House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Condemned Trump’s actions as a “despicable abuse of power” that may be incontestable.

“If it is potentially criminal, it may be incontestable. And even if there is no crime, it may be punishable,” Schiff told reporters on Sunday.

Justin Levitt, an expert on suffrage and a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles who was a former Justice Department official, believes Trump’s behavior in calling would be in violation of several laws if a prosecutor could prove the president did so white weren’t really thousands of countless ballots that would turn the election around.

These criminal violations could include a conspiracy to violate a federal electoral law that has been used in the past to prosecute electoral fraud and a violation of Georgian state law relating to incitement to electoral fraud, he said.

“It’s pretty appalling that the only question is whether the president is sufficiently detached from reality to believe he hasn’t committed a crime,” Levitt said.

The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment. During the call, President Raffensperger threatened possible legal ramifications if his demands were not met.

“You know what you did and you don’t report it,” Trump said during the call. “This is a criminal, this is a crime. And you cannot allow it. This is a great risk for you and for Ryan, your lawyer. This is a great risk.”

The call comes just days before two major Georgia Senate runoff elections, in which Democratic candidates’ victories in both races would turn control of the chamber, and less than a month before Biden’s inauguration. Trump is holding a rally for the Republican candidates on Monday.

Georgia is one of several states where the Trump campaign or the president’s supporters have fought unsuccessfully to change or invalidate the vote since Trump’s loss to Biden in the November election.

None of the lawsuits, recounts, or investigations in any state have identified the type of widespread electoral fraud or miscounts that would be required to reverse the election in Trump’s favor.

The number of votes in Georgia and other states since the November elections has already been confirmed, and the electoral college has confirmed Joe Biden’s victory.

Biden’s victory in Georgia was a big change in the Republican-controlled state as he was the first Democratic presidential candidate since Bill Clinton in 1992. After the first count showed Biden as the winner of the state, Georgia carried out a recount that showed the same result. Raffensperger confirmed the result on November 20th.

The tight profit margin and the presence of Republicans in key positions have made it a target in the Trump team’s efforts to change the election results. Trump has also pressured Governor Brian Kemp to help reverse the outcome, but Kemp said it was not legal for him to call a special legislative session to appoint a new list of presidential voters.

Biden’s victory is due to be confirmed by a joint congressional session on Wednesday, but a group of 11 Republican senators and elected senators, including Texas Senator Ted Cruz, want to delay the move, as do some members of the Republican House. Vice President Mike Pence “welcomed” the move to delay certification, according to his chief of staff, but others like Utah Senator Mitt Romney have been harshly critical of the plan.

Trump is expected to participate in anti-certification protests in Washington on Wednesday.