Categories
Health

In Crises, Vaccines Can Be Stretched, however Not Simply

In desperate times, there are many ways to stretch vaccines and speed up inoculation campaigns, according to experts who have done it.

Splitting doses, delaying second shots, injecting into the skin instead of the muscle and employing roving vaccination teams have all saved lives — when the circumstances were right.

During cholera outbreaks in war zones, Doctors Without Borders has even used “takeaway” vaccination, in which the recipient is given the first dose on the spot and handed the second to self-administer later.

Unfortunately, experts said, it would be difficult to try most of those techniques in the United States right now, even though vaccines against the coronavirus are rolling out far more slowly than had been hoped.

Those novel strategies have worked with vaccines against yellow fever, polio, measles, cholera and Ebola; most of those vaccines were invented decades ago or are easier to administer because they are oral or can be stored in a typical refrigerator.

The new mRNA-based coronavirus vaccines approved thus far are too fragile, experts said, and too little is known about how much immunity they confer.

The incoming Biden administration should focus on speeding up the production of more robust vaccines “rather than playing card tricks” with current ones, said Dr. Peter J. Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and the inventor of a coronavirus vaccine.

There are two strategies that might work with the current vaccines, but each is controversial.

The first is being tried in Britain. In December, faced with shortages and an explosive outbreak, the country’s chief medical officers said they would roll out all of the vaccine they had, giving modest protection to as many Britons as possible. Second doses, they said, would be delayed by up to 12 weeks and might be of a different vaccine.

There is some evidence for the idea: Early data from the first 600,000 injections in Israel suggest that even one dose of the Pfizer vaccine cut the risk of infection by about 50 percent.

Nonetheless, some British virologists were outraged, saying single doses could lead to vaccine-resistant strains. The Food and Drug Administration and many American vaccinologists also oppose the idea.

Moncef Slaoui, the chief scientific adviser to Operation Warp Speed, raised a different objection to the British plan. Single doses, he warned, might inadequately “prime” the immune system; then, if those vaccine recipients were later infected, some might do worse than if they had not been vaccinated at all.

He recalled a 1960s incident in which a weak new vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus, a cause of childhood pneumonia, backfired. Some children who received it and later became infected fell sicker than unvaccinated children, and two toddlers died.

“It may be only one in 1,000 who get inadequate priming, but it’s a concern,” Dr. Slaoui said. As an alternative — the second strategy for stretching the vaccines — he proposed using half-doses of the Moderna vaccine.

There is strong evidence for doing that, he said in a telephone interview. During Moderna’s early trials, the 50-microgram vaccine dose produced an immune response virtually identical to the 100-microgram one.

Moderna chose the higher dose as its standard partly to be extra sure it would work; company scientists at the time had no idea that their product would prove 95 percent effective. The higher dose would also have a longer shelf life.

But the vaccine works better than expected, and shelf life is not an issue, so Dr. Slaoui suggested using the lower dose.

“The beauty is, you inject half and get the identical immune response,” he said. “We hope that, in a pandemic situation, the F.D.A. may simply accept it rather than asking for a new trial.”

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine?

While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.

When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated?

Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.

If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask?

Yes, but not forever. The two vaccines that will potentially get authorized this month clearly protect people from getting sick with Covid-19. But the clinical trials that delivered these results were not designed to determine whether vaccinated people could still spread the coronavirus without developing symptoms. That remains a possibility. We know that people who are naturally infected by the coronavirus can spread it while they’re not experiencing any cough or other symptoms. Researchers will be intensely studying this question as the vaccines roll out. In the meantime, even vaccinated people will need to think of themselves as possible spreaders.

Will it hurt? What are the side effects?

The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection won’t be any different from ones you’ve gotten before. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. But some of them have felt short-lived discomfort, including aches and flu-like symptoms that typically last a day. It’s possible that people may need to plan to take a day off work or school after the second shot. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign: they are the result of your own immune system encountering the vaccine and mounting a potent response that will provide long-lasting immunity.

Will mRNA vaccines change my genes?

No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

Many experts disagreed with the idea, including Dr. Walter A. Orenstein, associate director of the Emory Vaccine Center in Atlanta. “We need to know more before we can feel comfortable doing that,” he said.

“Let’s stick to the science,” added Dr. Paul A. Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “There are no efficacy data on a partial dose.”

Although, like Dr. Slaoui, Dr. Offit opposed delaying second doses, he expressed doubt that doing so, as the British have, would raise the risk of worse outcomes in the partially vaccinated.

Trials in which monkeys or other animals were vaccinated and then “challenged” with a deliberate infection did not cause enhanced disease, he noted. Also, the four coronaviruses that cause common colds do not cause worse disease when people get them again. And people who have Covid-19 do not get worse when they receive antibody treatments; generally, they get better.

As is often the case, experts disagree about how and what a new vaccine will do. Some point to hard evidence that both fractional doses and delayed doses have worked when doctors have tried them out of desperation.

For example, yellow fever outbreaks in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo have been stymied by campaigns using as little as 20 percent of a dose.

One shot of yellow fever vaccine, invented in the 1930s, gives lifelong protection. But a one-fifth dose can protect for a year or more, said Miriam Alia, a vaccination expert for Doctors Without Borders.

In 2018, almost 25 million Brazilians, including those in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, faced a fast-moving outbreak at a time when there were fewer than six million shots in the global supply. The Brazilian government switched to one-fifth doses and sent mobile teams into the slums urging everyone they met to take them, and filling out minimal paperwork. It worked: By 2019, the threat had faded.

The tactic has also been used against polio. Since 2016, there has been a global shortage of the injectable polio vaccine, which many countries use in conjunction with the live oral one. The World Health Organization has overseen trials of different ways to stretch existing supplies.

India first tried half-doses, said Deepak Kapur, chairman of Rotary International’s polio eradication efforts in that country. Later studies showed that it was possible to drop to as low as one-fifth of a dose as long as it was injected just under the skin rather than into the muscle, said Dr. Tunji Funsho, chief of polio eradication for Rotary International’s Nigeria chapter.

“That way, one vial for 10 can reach 50 people,” Dr. Funsho said.

Skin injections work better than muscle ones because the skin contains far more cells that recognize invaders and because sub-skin layers drain into lymph nodes, which are part of the immune system, said Mark R. Prausnitz, a bioengineer at Georgia Tech who specializes in intradermal injection techniques.

“The skin is our interface with the outside world,” Dr. Prausnitz said. “It’s where the body expects to find pathogens.”

Intradermal injection is used for vaccines against rabies and tuberculosis. Ten years ago, Sanofi introduced an intradermal flu vaccine, “but the public didn’t accept it,” Dr. Prausnitz said.

Intradermal injection has disadvantages, however. It takes more training to do correctly. Injectors with needle-angling devices, super-short needles or arrays of multiple needles exist, Dr. Prausnitz said, but are uncommon. Ultimately, he favors micro-needle patches infused with dissolving vaccine.

“It would really be beneficial if we could just mail these to people’s homes and let them do it themselves,” he said.

A bigger disadvantage, Dr. Slaoui, is that intradermal injection produces strong immune reactions. These can be painful, and can bleed a bit and then scab over and leave a scar, as smallpox injections often did before the United States abandoned them in 1972.

The lipid nanoparticles in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines would be particularly prone to that effect, he said.

“It’s not dangerous,” he added. “But it’s not appealing and not practical.”

What the United States can and must do now, health experts said, is train more vaccinators, coordinate everyone delivering shots and get better at logistics.

Thanks to battles against polio, measles and Ebola, some of the world’s poorest countries routinely do better vaccination drives than the United States is now managing to do, said Emily Bancroft, president of Village Reach, a logistics and communications contractor working in Mozambique, Malawi and the Democratic Republic of Congo and also assisting Seattle’s coronavirus vaccine drive.

“You need an army of vaccinators, people who know how to run campaigns, detailed micro-plans and good data tracking,” she said. “Hospitals here don’t even know what they have on their shelves. For routine immunization, getting information once a month is OK. In an epidemic, it’s not OK.”

In 2017, the United Nations Children’s Fund recruited 190,000 vaccinators to give polio vaccines to 116 million children in one week. In the same year, Nigeria injected measles vaccine into almost five million children in a week.

In rural Africa, community health workers with little formal education delivered injectable contraceptives like Depo-Provera. The basics can be taught in one to three days, Ms. Bancroft said.

Training can be done on “injection pads” that resemble human arms. And data collection must be set up so that every team can report on a cellphone and it all flows to a national dashboard, as happens now in the poorest countries.

Categories
Health

J&J plans to have 100 million vaccines for Individuals by spring, board member says

Dr. Johnson & Johnson board member Mark McClellan told CNBC that “if the clinical trial works,” the company could significantly increase the availability of Covid vaccines in the coming weeks.

“I know J&J has a very large supply with its production both here in the US and elsewhere in the world, with the goal of maybe having enough vaccines for 100 million Americans by spring or April So,” said the former FDA commissioner in a Thursday evening interview on “The News with Shepard Smith”.

During a speech at the White House Thursday, government lead infectious disease doctor Anthony Fauci said Johnson & Johnson would have enough data on its vaccine to start analysis within a week or two. McClellan told host Shepard Smith that the most important thing about the company’s vaccine is the large-scale clinical trial that is ongoing.

“Based on these results, the independent scientists overseeing this study should take a closer look in the near future and we’ll see how quickly the vaccine could advance,” McClellan said.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, an average of 883,000 syringes of the Covid vaccine are given per day in the US for the past six days. Even so, less than 50% of the 37,960,000 cans distributed have found their way into people’s arms.

At least 12 states have reported vaccine shortages. Officials from San Francisco and New York warned they could be completely out of dose this week. At least 15 vaccination sites in New York City are temporarily closed. New York Mayor Bill DeBlasio told NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez that at least 23,000 vaccine appointments must be postponed.

McClellan noted that “the supply will go up, but probably not enough to keep up with the large number of Americans who are now really looking to get vaccinated.” However, he told Smith that he believes the Biden administration can help speed up the vaccine adoption rate.

“It’s going to be a challenge, but I think more than 100 million Americans can be vaccinated in the next few months,” said McClellan, a health policy expert at Duke University.

President Joe Biden promised a “full war effort” to fight the coronavirus pandemic and accelerate vaccine production using the Defense Production Act during a briefing Thursday.

“We have already identified suppliers and are working with them to move the plan forward,” said Biden.

He added that the DPA would help fix supply chain issues, including a shortage of syringes.

Categories
Health

Rising Coronavirus Variants Might Pose Challenges to Vaccines

Der stetige Drumbeat von Berichten über neue Varianten des Coronavirus – zuerst in Großbritannien, dann in Südafrika, Brasilien und den Vereinigten Staaten – hat eine neue Sorge aufgeworfen: Werden Impfstoffe vor diesen veränderten Versionen des Virus schützen?

Die Antwort lautet bisher Ja, sagten mehrere Experten in Interviews. Zwei kleine neue Studien, die am Dienstagabend online gestellt wurden, deuten jedoch darauf hin, dass einige Varianten das Immunsystem unerwartet herausfordern können, selbst bei denen, die geimpft wurden – eine Entwicklung, mit der die meisten Wissenschaftler seit Monaten oder Jahren nicht gerechnet hatten.

Die Ergebnisse stammen aus Laborexperimenten mit Blutproben von Patientengruppen und nicht aus Beobachtungen der Ausbreitung des Virus in der realen Welt. Die Studien wurden noch nicht von Experten begutachtet.

Experten, die die Papiere überprüften, waren sich jedoch einig, dass die Ergebnisse zwei störende Möglichkeiten aufwerfen. Menschen, die leichte Infektionen mit dem Coronavirus überlebt haben, sind möglicherweise immer noch anfällig für Infektionen mit einer neuen Variante. und besorgniserregender ist, dass die Impfstoffe gegen die Varianten möglicherweise weniger wirksam sind.

Bestehende Impfstoffe verhindern weiterhin schwere Krankheiten, und die Menschen sollten sie weiterhin erhalten, sagte Dr. Michel Nussenzweig, Immunologe an der Rockefeller University in New York, der eine der Studien leitete: „Wenn es Ihr Ziel ist, Menschen aus dem Krankenhaus herauszuhalten, dann wird das gut funktionieren. “

Aber die Impfstoffe dürfen nicht verhindern, dass Menschen leicht oder asymptomatisch mit den Varianten infiziert werden, sagte er. “Sie wissen möglicherweise nicht einmal, dass sie infiziert waren”, fügte Dr. Nussenzweig hinzu. Wenn der Infizierte das Virus weiterhin auf andere übertragen kann, die nicht immunisiert sind, fordert er weiterhin Leben.

Die Impfstoffe stimulieren den Körper, um Antikörper gegen das Coronavirus zu produzieren. Wissenschaftler hatten erwartet, dass das Virus im Laufe der Zeit Mutationen erhalten könnte, die es ihm ermöglichen, diesen Antikörpern auszuweichen – sogenannte Fluchtmutationen. Einige Studien hatten sogar vorhergesagt, welche Mutationen für das Virus am vorteilhaftesten wären.

Die Wissenschaftler hatten jedoch gehofft, dass die neuen Impfstoffe jahrelang wirksam bleiben würden, da das Coronavirus nur langsam neue Abwehrkräfte gegen sie entwickeln würde. Jetzt befürchten einige Forscher, dass die unkontrollierte Ausbreitung dem Virus nahezu uneingeschränkte Möglichkeiten gegeben hat, sich neu zu erfinden, und möglicherweise das Auftreten von Fluchtmutationen beschleunigt hat.

Die am Dienstagabend veröffentlichten Studien zeigen, dass die in Südafrika identifizierte Variante weniger anfällig für Antikörper ist, die durch natürliche Infektionen und durch Impfstoffe von Pfizer-BioNTech und Moderna erzeugt werden.

Weder die südafrikanische Variante noch ein ähnliches mutiertes Virus in Brasilien wurden in den USA bisher nachgewiesen. (Die ansteckendere Variante, die in Großbritannien aufgetaucht ist, enthält diese Mutationen nicht und scheint anfällig für Impfstoffe zu sein.)

Die Befürchtungen, dass die Impfstoffe gegen neue Varianten machtlos sein könnten, verstärkten sich auf einer wissenschaftlichen Konferenz, die am Samstag online stattfand, als südafrikanische Wissenschaftler berichteten, dass in Labortests Serumproben von 21 einer Gruppe von 44 Covid-19-Überlebenden die darin zirkulierende Variante nicht zerstörten dieses Land.

Die gegen die Variante erfolgreichen Proben wurden Patienten entnommen, die ins Krankenhaus eingeliefert worden waren. Diese Patienten hatten höhere Blutspiegel an sogenannten neutralisierenden Antikörpern – die Untergruppe der Antikörper, die zur Entwaffnung des Virus und zur Verhinderung einer Infektion benötigt werden – als diejenigen, die nur leicht krank waren.

Die Ergebnisse “deuten stark darauf hin, dass mehrere Mutationen, die wir in der südafrikanischen Variante sehen, einen signifikanten Einfluss auf die Neutralisationsempfindlichkeit dieses Virus haben werden”, sagte Penny Moore, Virologin am Nationalen Institut für übertragbare Krankheiten im Süden Afrika, das die Studie leitete.

Die zweite Studie brachte bessere Nachrichten, zumindest über Impfstoffe.

In dieser Studie testeten Dr. Nussenzweig und seine Kollegen Proben von 14 Personen, die den Moderna-Impfstoff erhalten hatten, und sechs Personen, die den Pfizer-BioNTech-Impfstoff erhalten hatten.

Covid19 Impfungen >

Antworten auf Ihre Impfstofffragen

Wenn ich in den USA lebe, wann kann ich den Impfstoff bekommen?

Während die genaue Reihenfolge der Impfstoffempfänger von Staat zu Staat unterschiedlich sein kann, werden die meisten Ärzte und Bewohner von Langzeitpflegeeinrichtungen an erster Stelle stehen. Wenn Sie verstehen möchten, wie diese Entscheidung getroffen wird, hilft dieser Artikel.

Wann kann ich nach der Impfung wieder zum normalen Leben zurückkehren?

Das Leben wird erst wieder normal, wenn die Gesellschaft als Ganzes ausreichend Schutz gegen das Coronavirus erhält. Sobald die Länder einen Impfstoff zugelassen haben, können sie in den ersten Monaten höchstens einige Prozent ihrer Bürger impfen. Die nicht geimpfte Mehrheit bleibt weiterhin anfällig für Infektionen. Eine wachsende Anzahl von Coronavirus-Impfstoffen zeigt einen robusten Schutz vor Krankheit. Es ist aber auch möglich, dass Menschen das Virus verbreiten, ohne zu wissen, dass sie infiziert sind, weil sie nur leichte oder gar keine Symptome haben. Wissenschaftler wissen noch nicht, ob die Impfstoffe auch die Übertragung des Coronavirus blockieren. Selbst geimpfte Menschen müssen vorerst Masken tragen, Menschenmassen in Innenräumen meiden und so weiter. Sobald genügend Menschen geimpft sind, wird es für das Coronavirus sehr schwierig, gefährdete Personen zu finden, die infiziert werden können. Je nachdem, wie schnell wir als Gesellschaft dieses Ziel erreichen, könnte sich das Leben im Herbst 2021 einem normalen Zustand nähern.

Muss ich nach der Impfung noch eine Maske tragen?

Ja, aber nicht für immer. Die beiden Impfstoffe, die möglicherweise in diesem Monat zugelassen werden, schützen die Menschen eindeutig vor einer Krankheit mit Covid-19. Die klinischen Studien, die diese Ergebnisse lieferten, waren jedoch nicht darauf ausgelegt, festzustellen, ob geimpfte Personen das Coronavirus noch verbreiten können, ohne Symptome zu entwickeln. Das bleibt eine Möglichkeit. Wir wissen, dass Menschen, die von Natur aus mit dem Coronavirus infiziert sind, es verbreiten können, ohne Husten oder andere Symptome zu haben. Die Forscher werden diese Frage bei der Einführung der Impfstoffe intensiv untersuchen. In der Zwischenzeit müssen sich selbst geimpfte Menschen als mögliche Spreizer vorstellen.

Wird es wehtun? Was sind die Nebenwirkungen?

Der Impfstoff gegen Pfizer und BioNTech wird wie andere typische Impfstoffe als Schuss in den Arm abgegeben. Die Injektion unterscheidet sich nicht von denen, die Sie zuvor erhalten haben. Zehntausende Menschen haben die Impfstoffe bereits erhalten, und keiner von ihnen hat ernsthafte gesundheitliche Probleme gemeldet. Einige von ihnen haben jedoch kurzlebige Beschwerden verspürt, darunter Schmerzen und grippeähnliche Symptome, die normalerweise einen Tag anhalten. Es ist möglich, dass die Leute planen müssen, nach dem zweiten Schuss einen Tag frei zu nehmen oder zur Schule zu gehen. Obwohl diese Erfahrungen nicht angenehm sind, sind sie ein gutes Zeichen: Sie sind das Ergebnis der Begegnung Ihres eigenen Immunsystems mit dem Impfstoff und einer starken Reaktion, die eine dauerhafte Immunität gewährleistet.

Werden mRNA-Impfstoffe meine Gene verändern?

Nein. Die Impfstoffe von Moderna und Pfizer verwenden ein genetisches Molekül, um das Immunsystem zu stärken. Dieses als mRNA bekannte Molekül wird schließlich vom Körper zerstört. Die mRNA ist in einer öligen Blase verpackt, die mit einer Zelle verschmelzen kann, so dass das Molekül hineinrutschen kann. Die Zelle verwendet die mRNA, um Proteine ​​aus dem Coronavirus herzustellen, die das Immunsystem stimulieren können. Zu jedem Zeitpunkt kann jede unserer Zellen Hunderttausende von mRNA-Molekülen enthalten, die sie produzieren, um eigene Proteine ​​herzustellen. Sobald diese Proteine ​​hergestellt sind, zerkleinern unsere Zellen die mRNA mit speziellen Enzymen. Die mRNA-Moleküle, die unsere Zellen herstellen, können nur wenige Minuten überleben. Die mRNA in Impfstoffen ist so konstruiert, dass sie den Enzymen der Zelle etwas länger standhält, sodass die Zellen zusätzliche Virusproteine ​​bilden und eine stärkere Immunantwort auslösen können. Die mRNA kann jedoch höchstens einige Tage halten, bevor sie zerstört wird.

Die Forscher sahen eine leichte Abnahme der Antikörperaktivität gegen manipulierte Viren mit drei der Schlüsselmutationen in der in Südafrika identifizierten Variante. Dieses Ergebnis war signifikant, “weil es bei nahezu jedem getesteten Individuum zu sehen ist”, sagte Dr. Nussenzweig. Trotzdem ist es “nicht etwas, worüber wir schrecklich ausgeflippt sein sollten.”

Bei den meisten Menschen führt eine Infektion mit dem Coronavirus zu einer starken Immunantwort; Die Impfstoffe scheinen eine noch stärkere Reaktion hervorzurufen. Zumindest zwei Dosen der Impfstoffe von Pfizer und Moderna produzieren neutralisierende Antikörper in Mengen, die höher sind als diejenigen, die durch natürliche Infektion erworben wurden.

Selbst wenn die Wirksamkeit der Antikörper verzehnfacht würde, wären die Impfstoffe gegen das Virus immer noch recht wirksam, sagte Jesse Bloom, Evolutionsbiologe am Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.

Während neutralisierende Antikörper für die Verhinderung einer Infektion unerlässlich sind, führen die Impfstoffe – und die natürliche Infektion – auch zur Produktion von Tausenden anderer Arten von Antikörpern, ganz zu schweigen von verschiedenen Immunzellen, die ein Gedächtnis des Virus behalten und zum Handeln angeregt werden können, wenn die Körper trifft es wieder.

Selbst wenn sie mit Varianten konfrontiert werden, können diese anderen Komponenten des Immunsystems ausreichen, um schwere Krankheiten zu verhindern, sagte Florian Krammer, Immunologe an der Icahn School of Medicine am Mount Sinai in New York. In klinischen Studien schützten die Impfstoffe Menschen bereits nach einer Dosis vor Krankheiten, wenn der Gehalt an neutralisierenden Antikörpern niedrig oder nicht nachweisbar war.

Impfstoffversuche, die in Südafrika von Novavax und Johnson & Johnson durchgeführt werden, werden realistischere Daten darüber liefern, wie sich die Impfstoffe gegen die dortige neue Variante verhalten. Diese Ergebnisse werden in den nächsten Wochen erwartet.

Alle Viren mutieren, und es ist keine Überraschung, dass einige dieser Mutationen die körpereigene Immunabwehr umgehen, sagten Experten. Jeder neue Wirt bietet einem Virus neue Möglichkeiten, Mutationen anzuhäufen und zu testen, indem die Sequenz der RNA-Buchstaben in seinem genetischen Code leicht durcheinander gebracht wird.

“Die Schönheit, die Eleganz, die Entwicklung und die Pracht eines Virus besteht darin, dass es jedes Mal, wenn es eine Person infiziert, diesen Sequenzraum erforscht”, sagte Paul Duprex, Direktor des Zentrums für Impfstoffforschung an der Universität von Pittsburgh.

Einige Mutationen verbessern das Original nicht und verschwinden. Andere erhöhen die Kraft des Erregers, indem sie ihn – wie die erstmals in Großbritannien identifizierte Variante – ansteckender oder weniger anfällig für Immunität machen.

Die Mutationen in der in Südafrika zirkulierenden Variante B.1.351 sind unabhängig voneinander mehr als einmal und insgesamt aufgetreten, was darauf hindeutet, dass sie gemeinsam zum Nutzen des Virus wirken.

Die Schlüsselmutation namens E484K, und zwei seiner Begleiter verändern die Form eines Teils des Virus, der für die Immunerkennung entscheidend ist, was es für Antikörper schwierig macht, sich an das Virus zu binden. Das Trio tauchte in mehreren Laborstudien auf, in denen versucht wurde, vorherzusagen, welche Mutationen für das Virus vorteilhaft sein würden.

“Ich denke, wir müssen Mutationen genau überwachen und nach solchen Dingen Ausschau halten, die in bestimmten Teilen der Welt dominant werden könnten”, sagte Akiko Iwasaki, Immunologe an der Yale University.

Großbritannien entdeckte die ansteckendere Variante, die dort zirkuliert, weil es mehr Virusproben sequenziert als jede andere Nation. Die Vereinigten Staaten bleiben weit zurück: Sie haben bisher etwa 71.000 Proben sequenziert, ein winziger Teil der Millionen, die im Land infiziert sind. Die Zentren für die Kontrolle und Prävention von Krankheiten planen jedoch, mit staatlichen und lokalen Gesundheitslabors zusammenzuarbeiten, um bis zu 6.000 Proben pro Woche zu sequenzieren, sagten Wissenschaftler der Agentur am Freitag.

Es wird wichtig sein, Reisen – und den Import von Varianten – aus anderen Ländern zu begrenzen, bis ein Großteil der Bevölkerung geimpft ist, sagte John Moore, Virologe bei Weill Cornell Medicine in New York.

“Selbst wenn sie bereits hier sind, ist es umso wahrscheinlicher, dass es zu einem Super-Spreader-Ereignis kommt, je öfter sie wieder eingeführt werden”, sagte Dr. Moore. (Präsident Joseph R. Biden Jr. plant, die bestehenden Reisebeschränkungen für alle beizubehalten, die kürzlich nach Europa und Brasilien gereist sind.)

Die mRNA-Technologie, auf die sich die Impfstoffe von Pfizer und Moderna stützen, kann innerhalb weniger Wochen geändert werden und ist weitaus einfacher als das Verfahren zur Herstellung von Grippeimpfstoffen. Es wäre jedoch ratsam, sich jetzt auf diese Möglichkeit vorzubereiten und nicht nur die technischen Aspekte der Aktualisierung der Impfstoffe, sondern auch die Prüfung, Zulassung und Einführung dieser Impfstoffe zu überdenken, so Experten.

Der beste Weg sei jedoch, die Entstehung neuer Mutationen und Varianten insgesamt zu verhindern.

“Stellen Sie sich vor, Sie müssen die ganze Zeit so aufholen – das ist nicht wünschenswert”, sagte Dr. Iwasaki. “Wenn wir die Ausbreitung so schnell wie möglich stoppen können, während der Impfstoff sehr effektiv ist, ist das der beste Weg.”

Categories
Business

With Vaccines Arriving, Worth Traders Strive for a Comeback

Bill Nygren, vice president of Oakmark Funds, says his firm holds shares in CBRE, an office leasing company that he expects to appreciate in an economic recovery. Office work, he says, will recover. “Any company with a differentiated culture that believes they can remotely keep it alive is wrong,” said Nygren.

At the same time, like some other value investors, Mr. Nygren has bought stocks that, by most definitions, are on the growth side rather than the value side of the stock spectrum. The three largest holdings in the Oakmark mutual fund are Alphabet, Facebook, and Netflix, which make up just over 11 percent of its portfolio.

“People say a growing company can’t be a value stock,” said Nygren. “But to us, a value stock means that the stock sells for less than the deal is worth.” Netflix’s rapidly growing subscriber base is more valuable than conventional metrics such as price-to-book values ​​would suggest.

Comcast is one of the largest holdings in the Dodge and Cox Stock Fund, which highlights high capital value stocks, said Charles Pohl, chairman and chief investment officer of Dodge and Cox. While Comcast’s traditional television business faces stiff competition from online competitors such as Netflix, the company is successful in providing high-speed Internet services to customers and should benefit from a broad economic recovery.

He is also confident that financial stocks will recover with the economy. As of September 30, the fund held shares in Capital One, Charles Schwab, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, and financial stocks should lose value as the economy recovers.

Steve Watson, Portfolio Manager at Capital Group, who works for the American Funds Capital Income Builder, among others, said: “If we look at the world again, the market will look across the valley to the other side. “” He pointed to Total, the French oil company, as one of the stocks that would return when the world returned. And he noted that chemical company Dow’s shares rose sharply late in the year “because it is a company with a broad portfolio of chemical products that will help the global economy recover.”

In his view, value stocks were wrongly “knocked down”. “The market has been overwhelmed by growth,” he said.

Categories
Health

WHO says Covid vaccines aren’t ‘silver bullets’ and relying totally on them has harm nations

On January 13, 2021, employees are storing coffins in the mourning hall of the crematorium in Meißen (East Germany), some of which are marked with “risk of infection” while others are scrawled in chalk, amid the new pandemic of the coronavirus COVID-19. Cremation.

Jens Schlueter | AFP | Getty Images

The World Health Organization said Friday that coronavirus vaccines are not “silver bullets” and that it has harmed nations to rely on them solely to fight the pandemic.

Some countries in Europe, Africa and America are seeing an increase in Covid-19 cases “because we are not generally able to break the chains of transmission at the community level or in households,” said WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus during a message Conference from the agency’s headquarters in Geneva.

With 2 million deaths around the world and the spread of new virus variants in multiple countries, world leaders must do whatever it takes to contain infection “through best public health measures,” Tedros said. “There is only one way out of this storm and that is to share the tools we have and to use them together.”

The coronavirus has infected more than 93.3 million people worldwide and killed at least 2 million people since the pandemic began about a year ago. This is based on data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. The virus continues to accelerate in some regions, and countries are reporting that their oxygen supplies are “dangerously low” for Covid-19 patients, the WHO said.

Some countries, including the US, have focused heavily on the use of vaccines to control their outbreaks. While vaccines are a useful tool, they won’t end the pandemic on their own, Mike Ryan, executive director of the WHO’s health emergencies program, told the news conference.

“We warned in 2020 that if we were to rely solely on vaccines as the only solution, we could lose the very controlled measures that were available to us at the time. And I think so to some extent is the case, “said Ryan. The addition of the colder seasons and recent holidays may also have played a role in spreading the virus.

“Much of the transmission has happened because we are reducing our physical distance … We are not breaking the chains of transmission. The virus is taking advantage of our lack of tactical commitment,” he added. “We’re not doing as well as we could.”

Dr. Bruce Aylward, a senior adviser to the WHO Director General, echoed Ryan’s comments, saying vaccines are not “silver bullets”.

“It can get worse, the numbers can go up,” he said. We have vaccines, yes. However, we have limited stocks of vaccines that are slowly being introduced around the world. And vaccines aren’t perfect. They don’t protect everyone from every situation. “

In the United States, the vaccination rate is slower than officials hoped. More than 31.1 million doses of vaccine had been distributed in the U.S. as of 6 a.m. ET Friday, but just over 12.2 million vaccinations had been given, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The cases are now increasing rapidly. The United States records at least 238,800 new Covid-19 cases and at least 3,310 virus-related deaths every day, based on a 7-day average calculated by CNBC using Johns Hopkins data.

On Thursday President-elect Joe Biden unveiled a comprehensive plan to combat the coronavirus pandemic in the United States. While his government will invest billions in a vaccine campaign, it will, among other things, expand testing, invest in new treatments, and work to identify new strains.

Categories
Health

An Appreciation for Vaccines, and How Far They Have Come

The first pertussis vaccines were developed and tested in the 1920s and 1930s and became universally applicable in the late 1940s. And they worked. Dr. James Cherry, a distinguished pediatric research professor at the David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California at Los Angeles and an expert on pertussis who has conducted extensive research on both the disease and the vaccines, cites more than 36,000 pertussis deaths from 1926 in the United States through 1930, most in young infants; from 1970 to 1974 there were 52.

Covid19 vaccinations>

Answers to your vaccine questions

If I live in the US, when can I get the vaccine?

While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary from state to state, most doctors and residents of long-term care facilities will come first. If you want to understand how this decision is made, this article will help.

When can I get back to normal life after the vaccination?

Life will only get back to normal once society as a whole receives adequate protection against the coronavirus. Once countries have approved a vaccine, they can only vaccinate a few percent of their citizens in the first few months. The unvaccinated majority remain susceptible to infection. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines show robust protection against disease. However, it is also possible that people spread the virus without knowing they are infected because they have mild symptoms or no symptoms at all. Scientists don’t yet know whether the vaccines will also block the transmission of the coronavirus. Even vaccinated people have to wear masks for the time being, avoid the crowds indoors and so on. Once enough people are vaccinated, it becomes very difficult for the coronavirus to find people at risk to become infected. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve this goal, life could approach a normal state in autumn 2021.

Do I still have to wear a mask after the vaccination?

Yeah, but not forever. The two vaccines that may be approved this month clearly protect people from contracting Covid-19. However, the clinical trials that produced these results were not designed to determine whether vaccinated people could still spread the coronavirus without developing symptoms. That remains a possibility. We know that people who are naturally infected with the coronavirus can spread it without experiencing a cough or other symptoms. Researchers will study this question intensively when the vaccines are introduced. In the meantime, self-vaccinated people need to think of themselves as potential spreaders.

Will it hurt What are the side effects?

The vaccine against Pfizer and BioNTech, like other typical vaccines, is delivered as a shot in the arm. The injection is no different from the ones you received before. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported serious health problems. However, some of them have experienced short-lived symptoms, including pain and flu-like symptoms that usually last a day. It is possible that people will have to plan to take a day off or go to school after the second shot. While these experiences are not pleasant, they are a good sign: they are the result of your own immune system’s encounter with the vaccine and a strong reaction that ensures lasting immunity.

Will mRNA vaccines change my genes?

No. Moderna and Pfizer vaccines use a genetic molecule to boost the immune system. This molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse with a cell, allowing the molecule to slide inside. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus that can stimulate the immune system. At any given moment, each of our cells can contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules that they produce to make their own proteins. As soon as these proteins are made, our cells use special enzymes to break down the mRNA. The mRNA molecules that our cells make can only survive a few minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a little longer, so the cells can make extra viral proteins and trigger a stronger immune response. However, the mRNA can hold for a few days at most before it is destroyed.

When I first started in pediatrics in the 1980s, the DTP was without a doubt the shot we least liked to give. From the recordings we routinely took, the children were more likely to react – with fever, sore arms, and sometimes, though very rarely, more serious reactions. We sometimes called it “reactogen”.

The reactions had a lot to do with what was going into the vaccine: whole inactivated Bordetella pertussis bacteria. And although bacteria are microscopic, they are enormous and complex cells compared to viruses, which are made up only of protein and nucleic acid (DNA or RNA). In other words, a whole-cell vaccine had many different compounds that the body could respond to – there are more than 3,000 different proteins in the bacterial cell. For diphtheria and tetanus, individual “toxoids” were used, inactivated versions of the poisons made by these bacteria, so these components were much less reactive.

There were parents who believed their children had been harmed by the vaccine and a strong mood against what we would now call the anti-vaccine movement, as well as ongoing medical controversy over what problems the vaccine had caused and what coincidences were of timing in a vaccine at ages 2, 4, and 6 months and then again in about a year and a half.

Since 1999, children in the USA have been vaccinated with DTaP rather than DTP, with the “a” standing for “acellular”. No more whole cells; These vaccine developers used specific proteins that the body would make immunity to. DTaP recordings are significantly less “reactogenic”.

They also tend to be less effective in eliciting a long-lasting effective immune response; In a 2019 report, Dr. Cherry that the whole-cell vaccines were more effective than the acellular vaccines in almost every clinical study. This included some risk / benefit trade-off and ongoing discussion, as the switch to DTaP has recently been linked to the most recent number of cases, but not necessarily fatalities, and Dr. Cherry argues that the increased number of reported cases may actually be a result of awareness raising and better testing. But even if there is more pertussis in adults thanks to the vaccines, it is no longer a fatal disease in young children.

Although a safe adult booster called Tdap has now been developed, there is still a major pertussis infection among teenagers and adults that is often undiagnosed even by doctors because it may not look so different in adults than other coughs and colds.

Categories
Health

Stress Grows for States to Open Vaccines to Extra Teams of Individuals

Just weeks into the country’s coronavirus vaccination effort, states have begun broadening access to the shots faster than planned, amid tremendous public demand and intense criticism about the pace of the rollout.

Some public health officials worry that doing so could bring even more chaos to the complex operation and increase the likelihood that some of the highest-risk Americans will be skipped over. But the debate over how soon to expand eligibility is intensifying as deaths from the virus continue to surge, hospitals are overwhelmed with critically ill patients and millions of vaccine doses delivered last month remain in freezers.

Governors are under enormous pressure from their constituents — especially older people, who vote in great numbers and face the highest risk of dying from the virus — to get the doses they receive into arms swiftly. President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s decision, announced Friday, to release nearly all available doses to the states when he takes office on Jan. 20, rather than holding half to guarantee each recipient gets a booster shot a few weeks after the first, is likely to add to that pressure.

Some states, including Florida, Louisiana and Texas, have already expanded who is eligible to get a vaccine now, even though many people in the first priority group recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — the nation’s 21 million health care workers and three million residents of nursing homes and other long-term care facilities — have not yet received a shot.

On Friday afternoon, New York became the latest state to do so, announcing that it would allow people 75 and over and certain essential workers to start receiving a vaccine on Monday.

But reaching a wider swath of the population requires much more money than states have received for the task, many health officials say, and more time to fine-tune systems for moving surplus vaccine around quickly, to increase the number of vaccination sites and people who give the shots, and to establish reliable appointment systems to prevent endless lines and waits.

Some states’ expansions have led to frantic and often futile efforts by older people to get vaccinated. After Florida opened up vaccinations to anyone 65 and older late last month, the demand was so great that new online registration portals quickly overloaded and crashed, people spent hours on the phone trying to secure appointments and others waited overnight at scattered pop-up sites offering shots on a first-come first-served basis.

Similar scenes have played out in parts of Texas, Tennessee and a handful of other states.

Still, with C.D.C. data suggesting that only about a third of the doses distributed so far have been used, Alex M. Azar II, the health and human services secretary, told reporters this past week: “It would be much better to move quickly and end up vaccinating some lower-priority people than to let vaccines sit around while states try to micromanage this process. Faster administration would save lives right now, which means we cannot let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”

The C.D.C. guidelines were drawn up by an independent committee of medical and public health experts that advises the agency on immunization practices; it deliberated for months about who should get vaccinated initially, while supplies were still very limited. The committee weighed scientific evidence about who is most at risk of getting very sick or dying from Covid-19, as well as ethical questions, such as how best to ensure equal access among different races and socioeconomic groups.

Although the committee’s recommendations are nonbinding, states usually follow them; in this case, the committee suggests that states might consider expanding to additional priority groups “when demand in the current phase appears to have been met,” “when supply of authorized vaccine increases substantially” or “when vaccine supply within a certain location is in danger of going unused.”

Dr. Kevin Ault, an obstetrician at the University of Kansas Medical Center who serves on the advisory committee that came up with the C.D.C. guidelines, said that it was reasonable for states to start vaccinating new groups before finishing others, but that they should be careful about exacerbating inequities and biting off more than they can chew.

“Obviously if you’re going to vaccinate that group you need to have a well-thought-out plan in hand,” he said, referring to the over-65 population. “Having people camping out for vaccine is less than ideal, I would say.”

He added, “We put a lot of thought and effort into our guidelines, and I think they are good.”

After the first vaccines were given in mid-December, a dichotomy emerged between governors who were adhering precisely to the guidelines and others who moved quickly to populations beyond health care workers and nursing home residents.

Until Friday, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York, a Democrat, had threatened to penalize hospitals that provided shots to people who are not health care workers. By contrast, Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida, a Republican, traveled to retirement communities around his state to emphasize the importance of getting people 65 and older, who number more than five million there, immunized fast.

“In Florida we’ve got to put our parents and grandparents first,” Mr. DeSantis said at The Villages, the nation’s largest retirement community, just before Christmas.

Decisions on how soon to expand eligibility for the shots have not fallen neatly along partisan lines.

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine?

While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.

When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated?

Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.

If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask?

Yes, but not forever. The two vaccines that will potentially get authorized this month clearly protect people from getting sick with Covid-19. But the clinical trials that delivered these results were not designed to determine whether vaccinated people could still spread the coronavirus without developing symptoms. That remains a possibility. We know that people who are naturally infected by the coronavirus can spread it while they’re not experiencing any cough or other symptoms. Researchers will be intensely studying this question as the vaccines roll out. In the meantime, even vaccinated people will need to think of themselves as possible spreaders.

Will it hurt? What are the side effects?

The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection won’t be any different from ones you’ve gotten before. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. But some of them have felt short-lived discomfort, including aches and flu-like symptoms that typically last a day. It’s possible that people may need to plan to take a day off work or school after the second shot. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign: they are the result of your own immune system encountering the vaccine and mounting a potent response that will provide long-lasting immunity.

Will mRNA vaccines change my genes?

No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

Gov. Larry Hogan of Maryland, a Republican, announced Tuesday that he would immediately switch to what he called the “Southwest Airlines model” for vaccine allocation, referring to the airline’s open seating policy. “We’re no longer going to be waiting for all the members of a particular priority group to be completed,” he said, “before we move on to begin the next group in line.”

Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio, a Republican, urged patience in a news briefing Tuesday as he declined to estimate when the state would start vaccinating people beyond the first priority group, known as “1a.”

“We’re asking every health department, ‘Don’t go outside 1a, stay within your lane,’” he said, adding about the vaccines, “This is a scarce commodity.”

By Thursday Mr. DeWine had set a date for people 80 and older to start getting the vaccine — Jan. 19 — and said he would phase in everyone 65 and older, as well as teachers, by Feb. 8.

The reasons so many doses received by states have not yet been administered to the first priority group are manifold. The fact that vaccination began around Christmas, when many hospital employees were taking vacation, slowed things. More health care workers are refusing to get the vaccine than many of their employers expected, and some hospitals and clinics received more doses than they needed but felt constrained by state rules from giving them to people outside the first priority groups. Some initially worried they could not even offer leftover doses in open vials to people in lower priority groups and let them go to waste.

And federal funding for vaccination efforts has been slow to reach states and localities: They got only $350 million through the end of last year, a little more than $1 per resident of the country. The economic rescue package that Congress passed in December included $8 billion for vaccine distribution that state health officials had long sought, but the first tranche of it, about $3 billion, is only now starting to be sent out.

“There was great funding in the development of these products, great funding in the infrastructure to ship them and get them out,” said Dr. Steven Stack, commissioner of the Kentucky Department for Public Health. “But then there was no funding provided of meaning for administering the vaccine, which is the last mile of this journey.”

The C.D.C. has recommended that a “1b” group consisting of people 75 and older and certain essential workers, including teachers, corrections officers and grocery store employees, be vaccinated next. The second group is much larger, about 50 million people. And the third recommended priority group — people 65 to 74, anyone 16 and older with high-risk medical conditions, and essential workers not already reached — numbers almost 130 million.

Pfizer and Moderna have pledged to deliver enough vaccine doses for 100 million people to each get the two necessary shots by the end of March, and many more in the second quarter. Several other vaccine candidates are far along in the pipeline, and if approved for emergency use here could help ramp up distribution more quickly.

The C.D.C. committee initially considered recommending that a wide range of essential workers get vaccinated before older Americans. Its rationale was that many essential workers are low-wage people of color, who have been hit disproportionately hard by the virus and had limited access to good health care. That sparked a backlash, and several governors, including Mr. DeSantis, quickly made clear they would cater to older people first.

Dr. Mark McClellan, who formerly headed the F.D.A. and now runs Duke University’s health policy center, said that while pushing ahead to vaccinate older people and other particularly vulnerable groups would accelerate the overall effort, “we’re going to be missing a lot of higher-risk individuals along the way.”

“I do worry about that becoming uneven in terms of access,” he said during a press briefing, “with lower-income groups, minority groups maybe in a tougher position if we don’t make it very easy for people in these high-risk groups to get vaccinated.”

Dr. Marcus Plescia, the chief medical officer for the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, said he was surprised to hear federal officials like Mr. Azar and Dr. Jerome Adams, the surgeon general, advocate expanding vaccine access so broadly so soon.

“We didn’t come up with priority populations to slow things down, but because we knew there would be limited numbers of doses,” Dr. Plescia said. “If we try to do this in an equitable, fair way, it’s not going to be as fast as if our only goal is to get vaccine into as many arms as possible.”

Whether or not they are widening access now, governors are ramping up pressure on hospitals to use their allocated doses more quickly. Mr. Cuomo threatened to fine those that did not use their initial allocations by the end of this past week and not send them any more.

Mr. Hogan warned hospitals this past week, “Either use the doses that have been allocated to you or they will be directed to another facility or provider.”

Categories
Health

Why Covid-19 Vaccines Take a Whereas to Kick In

A barrage of headlines this week flooded social media, documenting a seemingly worrying case of Covid-19 with a San Diego nurse who fell ill about a week after his first injection of Pfizer’s coronavirus vaccine.

However, experts said the disease is not unexpected: it is known that vaccines take at least a couple of weeks to protect themselves. And getting sick before getting a two-dose vaccination shouldn’t affect the effectiveness of Pfizer’s product, which has blown away with flying colors through late-stage clinical trials.

Reporting that a half-vaccinated person has Covid-19 is “really the equivalent of saying someone went outside without an umbrella and got wet in the middle of a rainstorm,” said Dr. Taison Bell, an intensive care physician at the University of Virginia. Dr. Bell received his first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on December 15th and will soon be receiving his second shot.

The California nurse, identified as Matthew W. (45) on an ABC10 news report, received his first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on December 18. Six days later, he started experiencing mild symptoms such as chills and muscle pain and fatigue, according to news reports. He tested positive for the virus the day after Christmas.

Dr. Megan Ranney, an emergency doctor at Brown University, said this shouldn’t be a concern. “So what????” She tweeted Wednesday in response to a Reuters article about the nurse’s illness. “It’s a 2-shot vaccination.” Dr. Ranney received her first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on December 18th.

Dr. Describing the nurse’s illness as news, Ranney said in an interview that this was a departure from expectations – and that there should be protection about a week after the first dose of vaccine. That is not the case at all.

Vaccines take at least a few days to be protective. Pfizer’s recipe is based on a molecule called messenger RNA, or mRNA, which once injected into human cells and instructs them to make a coronavirus protein called Spike. None of these components are infectious or can cause Covid-19. But they act as coronavirus mimickers, teaching the body to recognize the real virus and defeat it should it ever occur.

It is believed that the production of spikes occurs within hours of the first shot. However, the body needs at least a few days to memorize the material before it can break down its entire arsenal of defenses against the virus. Immune cells take this time to examine the protein, then mature, multiply, and sharpen their spike-spotting reflexes.

Data from Pfizer’s clinical trials suggests that the vaccine could protect its recipients from disease about a week or two after the first injection. A second shot of mRNA, released three weeks after the first, helps the immune cells incorporate the most important features of the virus into memory and speed up the protection process.

Covid19 vaccinations>

Answers to your vaccine questions

With a coronavirus vaccine spreading out of the US, here are answers to some questions you may be wondering about:

    • If I live in the US, when can I get the vaccine? While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary from state to state, most doctors and residents of long-term care facilities will come first. If you want to understand how this decision is made, this article will help.
    • When can I get back to normal life after the vaccination? Life will only get back to normal once society as a whole receives adequate protection against the coronavirus. Once countries have approved a vaccine, they can only vaccinate a few percent of their citizens in the first few months. The unvaccinated majority remain susceptible to infection. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines show robust protection against disease. However, it is also possible that people spread the virus without knowing they are infected because they have mild or no symptoms. Scientists don’t yet know whether the vaccines will also block the transmission of the coronavirus. Even vaccinated people have to wear masks for the time being, avoid the crowds indoors and so on. Once enough people are vaccinated, it becomes very difficult for the coronavirus to find people at risk to become infected. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve this goal, life could approach a normal state in autumn 2021.
    • Do I still have to wear a mask after the vaccination? Yeah, but not forever. Here’s why. The coronavirus vaccines are injected deep into the muscles and stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies. This seems to be sufficient protection to protect the vaccinated person from disease. What is not clear, however, is whether it is possible for the virus to bloom in the nose – and sneeze or exhale to infect others – even if antibodies have been mobilized elsewhere in the body to prevent that vaccinated person gets sick. The vaccine clinical trials were designed to determine whether people who were vaccinated are protected from disease – not to find out whether they can still spread the coronavirus. Based on studies of flu vaccines and even patients infected with Covid-19, researchers have reason to hope that people who are vaccinated will not spread the virus, but more research is needed. In the meantime, everyone – including those who have been vaccinated – must imagine themselves as possible silent shakers and continue to wear a mask. Read more here.
    • Will it hurt What are the side effects? The vaccine against Pfizer and BioNTech, like other typical vaccines, is delivered as a shot in the arm. The injection in your arm feels no different than any other vaccine, but the rate of short-lived side effects seems to be higher than with the flu shot. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported serious health problems. The side effects, which can be similar to symptoms of Covid-19, last about a day and are more likely to occur after the second dose. Early reports from vaccine trials suggest that some people may need to take a day off because they feel lousy after receiving the second dose. In the Pfizer study, around half developed fatigue. Other side effects occurred in at least 25 to 33 percent of patients, sometimes more, including headache, chills, and muscle pain. While these experiences are not pleasant, they are a good sign that your own immune system is having a potent response to the vaccine that provides lasting immunity.
    • Will mRNA vaccines change my genes? No. Moderna and Pfizer vaccines use a genetic molecule to boost the immune system. This molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse with a cell, allowing the molecule to slide inside. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus that can stimulate the immune system. At any given moment, each of our cells can contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules that they produce to make their own proteins. As soon as these proteins are made, our cells use special enzymes to break down the mRNA. The mRNA molecules that our cells make can only survive a few minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a little longer, so the cells can make extra viral proteins and trigger a stronger immune response. However, the mRNA can hold for a few days at most before it is destroyed.

The California nurse’s illness schedule falls well within the post-vaccination vulnerability window, said Dr. Ranney. It’s also very likely that he discovered the virus around the time he got the shot, maybe even before that. People may notice symptoms of Covid-19 between two and 14 days after the coronavirus emerges, if they ever have symptoms.

A similar situation appears to have developed recently with Mike Harmon, the Kentucky state chartered accountant, who tested positive for the virus this week the day after receiving his first dose of an unspecified coronavirus vaccine.

“It appears that I was unknowingly exposed to the virus and got infected either shortly before or after receiving the first dose of the vaccine on Monday,” Harmon said in a statement. Mr Harmon reiterated his “full confidence in the vaccine itself and the need for as many people to receive it as soon as possible”.

Jerica Pitts, a Pfizer spokeswoman, noted that the vaccine’s protective effect “is significantly increased after the second dose, supporting the need for a two-dose series”.

“People may have contracted an illness before or immediately after being vaccinated,” she said.

Pfizer’s vaccine, when given in its full two-dose regimen, was found to be 95 percent effective in preventing symptomatic cases of Covid-19 – a figure that is very welcome news given the rise Coronavirus case numbers was celebrated. Still, a small percentage of people who are not protected after vaccination remain, said Dr. Ranney. “There is no such thing as a vaccine that is 100 percent effective.”

It is also unclear how well Pfizer’s vaccine can protect against asymptomatic infections, or whether it significantly limits the ability of the coronavirus to spread from person to person. This means that measures such as masking and distancing remain essential even after a full vaccination.

Data collected by Pfizer during its late-stage clinical trials suggested that the vaccine might provide at least some protection after a single dose. However, the study was not intended to specifically test how effective a one-shot regimen would be.

Dr. Krutika Kuppalli, an infectious disease doctor at the Medical University of South Carolina, said some of her colleagues tested positive shortly after their first shots. “None of this surprises me given the prevalence of the cases now,” she said. Given the expected delay in vaccination effect, “this should not be viewed as a vaccination failure”. Dr. Kuppalli, who received her first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine on Dec. 15, added that taking Covid-19 between vaccine doses shouldn’t stop anyone from getting a second shot after consulting a health care provider.

In the past few weeks, more than 2.7 million people in the US have received their first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine, or a similar shot of Moderna. Both vaccines require a second injection – and as they’re made available to more people, it’s important to keep clear communication about how and when vaccines work, said Dr. Bell.

“For now we should stick to the dosages as the experiments were carried out,” he said. “This is what will bring you maximum effectiveness.”

Categories
Business

China Has All It Must Vaccinate Hundreds of thousands, Besides Proof Its Vaccines Work

Hospitals across China have almost everything that is needed for mass vaccination: millions of doses. Refrigerators to store them. Health care workers trained to manage them.

Anything but evidence that one of their vaccines is working.

Unlike their Western competitors, the Chinese companies have not released late-stage clinical trial data showing whether their vaccines are effective, and regulatory agencies in China have not officially approved them.

This hasn’t stopped local governments across the country from launching an ambitious vaccination campaign. The aim is to vaccinate 50 million people – roughly the population of Colombia – before the New Year holidays by mid-February, when hundreds of millions of people are expected to travel.

China, where the virus first emerged a year ago, will be making great – and scientifically unorthodox – efforts to prevent the outbreak from recurring. Although Beijing has not officially announced the vaccination target, the government has signaled that the rollout will be similar to the outbreak, through a top-down approach that can mobilize thousands of workers to produce the shots, too send and manage. Local officials were told that the trip was a “political mission”.

The campaign will focus on what China calls ‘key priority groups’ including doctors, hotel workers, border control personnel, Food warehouse and transport workers and travelers. Irene Zhang, a 24-year-old college student, received a vaccine in Hangzhou on December 22nd before going to graduate school in the UK next month.

“Because my situation is pretty urgent and all the students around me going abroad have accepted it, I think it is relatively reliable,” said Ms. Zhang.

Even before this current campaign, more than a million people had lined up for vaccinations, confusing scientists who warned that taking undetected vaccines poses potential health risks. Their efforts, which are now larger in scope, are similarly implemented on an ad hoc basis.

The southern province of Guangdong has 180,000 people – mostly workers who are involved with food Storage and transportation, quarantine facilities and border controls – had been vaccinated by December 22nd. 281,800 people had been vaccinated in eastern Zhejiang Province. In Wuhan, where the outbreak was first discovered, the government said it had designated 48 vaccination clinics for its emergency program that began Thursday.

China, which is testing five vaccines in phase 3 studies, has not provided any information from this final phase to prove the effectiveness of these vaccines. In contrast, the United States and Great Britain began vaccination after reviewing and approving such experimental data.

Instead, Chinese officials have made extensive statements with few details to reassure the public that the vaccines are safe and effective. Three of the vaccines are only approved for emergency use. Last month, Liu Jingzhen, the chairman of Sinopharm, a state-owned vaccine maker that has two vaccines in late studies, said none of the roughly 1 million people vaccinated so far had side effects and that “few had mild symptoms.”

The dates and approval are expected to be available within weeks. While there have been promising signs, there are limitations.

The UAE and Bahrain said this month that a vaccine made by Sinopharm was effective, although they provided few details on how the conclusions were drawn. Turkey said a vaccine from Sinovac, a private vaccine maker based in Beijing, had an efficacy rate of 91.25 percent, a result based on preliminary results from a small clinical study. Officials in Brazil said the Sinovac vaccine had an efficacy rate of over 50 percent but had postponed the publication of detailed data.

The extent and speed of the vaccination campaign are the result of a centralized public health infrastructure in an authoritarian system. During the crisis, China showed how it can mobilize thousands of workers to reach millions of people. it tested 11 million people in 10 days in Wuhan.

Updated

Apr. 29, 2020, 6:59 p.m. ET

Chinese vaccine manufacturers have worked to increase production, both for the country’s own needs and for global exports. The Chinese government has promised to produce 610 million cans by the end of the year and expects to produce more than a billion cans in the next year.

“If they say 50 million, they probably will,” said Jennifer Huang Bouey, a senior policy researcher at RAND Corporation and an epidemiologist. “The question is how much it would cost and what effect that would have.”

The whole effort took months of preparation. Since June, hospitals in Guangdong Province have started building vaccination clinics, equipping them with refrigerators and installing cold storage systems.

Sinopharm was doing exercises this month. During the test run, workers loaded boxes of the vaccines and ice packs, while the company official tracked the temperature of the vaccines in real time as they were shipped.

China has some advantages in introducing it. Unlike the Pfizer vaccine, the vaccines made by Sinopharm and Sinovac are based on traditional methods that use inactivated or weakened forms of the virus, making them easier to store and distribute.

But the pitfalls are numerous, as the US experience has shown. in the In the United States, just over two million people have received Covid-19 vaccine, well below the government’s 20 million target for this month. Hospitals had to prepare the frozen shots and find staff to occupy the clinics.

While China was preparing, local officials asked the number of people in the “key priority groups”. According to a government document from Xinchang County in Zhejiang Province, they had to “make sure there were no omissions.”

As recently as two months ago, it seemed that demand might exceed supply. The eastern city of Yiwu had offered 500 cans that were used within a few hours.

Ms. Zhang, the student, said She had initially hesitated about getting vaccinated because everyone around her told her to “wait and see”. Nevertheless, she tried to register in Yiwu, but could not secure a place.

Then on December 21st, Ms. Zhang heard that Hangzhou was launching its own vaccination campaign. She took a bullet train that evening and signed a lease with her friend in town because local authorities required proof of residence. The next day, she paid $ 35 and was shot by Sinovac.

According to Ms. Zhang, four or five people were waiting for the vaccine in the hospital. The process took an hour. This included registering, getting the shot, and waiting 30 minutes to see if any side effects occurred.

“Everything was very calm and tidy,” she said. Before she left, the doctor warned her: don’t shower. Don’t stay up late. Do not eat foods that may irritate your stomach.

The government has emphasized that the vaccination campaign is voluntary and that people have to pay for the vaccinations. Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow on global health at the Council on Foreign Relations and a health care expert in China, noted that the two-dose regime could cost about $ 70, making it inaccessible to the rural poor.

China may also have trouble convincing people to take the vaccine. Scientists warn that the lack of transparency could spark fears about taking a new vaccine, especially in an industry with a history of quality scandals.

Tao Lina, a vaccine expert and former immunologist at the Shanghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, said he knew several health care workers who turned down the shots. “In the minds of doctors, they believe that any drug that fails Phase 3 trials is unreliable,” Tao said.

Mr. Tao, who received a Sinopharm vaccine Monday, said he was confident the vaccines were safe and effective, reiterating officials’ comments that there had been no reports of serious side effects. But he added that companies could do better with their news.

“If you say it’s safe, you should come up with all kinds of evidence to show it’s safe,” he said.

Hminem Zhang, a 27-year-old sales rep at an internet company, said he wanted to get vaccinated because he had traveled to work and feared that the virus could reappear if the virus recurs. But he is concerned about the ones made in China because “not many people received them,” he said.

“I would like to wait a month or two for some official data to be released,” said Mr. Zhang, who is from Chongqing, southwestern town. “And then if there’s no news about side effects, I’ll get a chance.”

Liu Yi, Amber Wang, and Elsie Chen contributed to the research.

Categories
Health

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo updates the general public as state rolls out Covid vaccines

[The stream is slated to start at 11:30 a.m. ET. Please refresh the page if you do not see a player above at that time.]

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo will hold a press conference Wednesday on plans to distribute Covid-19 vaccines amid threats of further economic shutdown of the state.

Last week, Cuomo and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio noted that the state may close non-essential stores in some regions in January. For weeks, Cuomo has been saying he will put more restrictions in parts of the state where hospitals are so overwhelmed they can’t care for every patient.

However, he has determined that it is up to New York residents to follow public health precautions to limit the spread of the coronavirus and avoid a shutdown.

“Of course, a shutdown in January is possible,” Cuomo said last week. “But there is a big but,” he said and spelled the word “BUT” one letter at a time.

– CNBC’s Noah Higgins-Dunn contributed to this report.

Read CNBC’s live updates for the latest news on the Covid-19 outbreak.