Categories
Health

Ought to Folks With Immune Issues Get Third Vaccine Doses?

When it came to coronavirus vaccination, the third time was the charm for Esther Jones, a dialysis nurse in rural Oregon. After two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine failed to jolt her immune system into producing antibodies, she sought out a third, this time the Moderna shot.

It worked. Blood tests revealed a reasonable antibody response, although lower than what would be detected in healthy people. She received a fourth dose last month in hopes of boosting the levels even more.

Ms. Jones, 45, had a kidney transplant in 2010. To prevent rejection of the organ, she has taken drugs that suppress the immune response ever since. She expected to have trouble responding to a coronavirus vaccine, and enrolled in one of the few studies so far to test the utility of a third dose in people with weak immune systems.

Since April, health care providers in France have routinely given a third dose of a two-dose vaccine to people with certain immune conditions. The number of organ transplant recipients who had antibodies increased to 68 percent four weeks after the third dose from 40 percent after the second dose, one team of French researchers recently reported.

The study in which Ms. Jones enrolled has turned up similar results in 30 organ transplant recipients who procured third doses on their own.

Being vulnerable to infection even after inoculation is “very scary and frustrating” for immunocompromised people, said Dr. Dorry Segev, a transplant surgeon at Johns Hopkins University who led the study. “They have to continue to act unvaccinated until we figure out a way to give them better immunity.”

But in the United States, there is no concerted effort by federal agencies or vaccine manufacturers to test this approach, leaving people with low immunity with more questions than answers. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health in fact recommend even against testing to find out who is protected. And academic scientists are stymied by the rules that limit access to the vaccines.

“There should be already a national study looking at post-transplant patients getting booster shots,” said Dr. Balazs Halmos, an oncologist at the Montefiore Medical Center in the Bronx, who led a study showing that some cancer patients did not respond to the vaccines. “It shouldn’t be our little team here in the Bronx trying to figure this out.”

An estimated 5 percent of the population is considered to be immunocompromised. The list of causes is long: some cancers, organ transplants, chronic liver disease, kidney failure and dialysis, and drugs like Rituxan, steroids and methotrexate, which are taken by roughly 5 million people for disorders from rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis to some forms of cancer.

“These are the people being left behind,” said Dr. Jose U. Scher, a rheumatologist at NYU Langone Health who led a study of methotrexate’s effect on the vaccines.

Not everyone who has one of these risk factors is affected. But without more research, it’s impossible to know who might need extra doses of the vaccines, and how many. Besides the risk of Covid-19, there is also evidence that low immunity may allow the virus to continue to replicate in the body for long periods, potentially leading to new variants.

An infusion of monoclonal antibodies may help some people who don’t produce antibodies on their own — but again, the idea is not being thoroughly explored, said John Moore, a virologist at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York.

Use of monoclonal antibodies “makes great sense for this group of people, so I would like to see the companies be more active in this area,” he said. “Government support or pressure would also help.”

Updated 

July 4, 2021, 4:20 p.m. ET

The third-dose approach has widespread support among researchers because there is clear precedent. Immunocompromised people are given booster doses of vaccines for hepatitis B and influenza, for example. And discontinuing methotrexate after getting a flu vaccine is known to improve the vaccine’s potency — evidence that compelled the American College of Rheumatology to recommend pausing methotrexate use for one week before being immunized against the coronavirus.

Several studies have indicated that a third coronavirus vaccine dose might succeed in patients who did not have detectable antibodies after the first or second dose. But research has lagged.

Moderna is gearing up to test a third dose in 120 organ transplant recipients, and Pfizer — which produces some immunosuppressant medications — is planning a study of 180 adults and 180 children with an immune condition.

The companies turned down at least two independent teams who hoped to study the effects of a third dose.

The N.I.H. is recruiting 400 immunocompromised people for a trial that would track their levels of antibodies and immune cells for up to 24 months — but has no trials looking at a third dose.

“It takes time, unfortunately, especially as a government agency,” said Emily Ricotta, an epidemiologist at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. “We have to go through a lot of regulatory and approval processes to do these sorts of projects.”

But that explanation does not satisfy some researchers. Many medical centers already have groups of patients who did not respond to the vaccines, so federal agencies could organize a clinical trial without too much difficulty, Dr. Scher noted. “It’s a very simple study,” he said. “There’s no rocket science here.”

Earlier studies suggested that many people with cancer would not respond to the vaccines, but those analyses were done after the patients had received a single dose. A new study published this month by Dr. Halmos of Montefiore Medical Center and his colleagues laid some of those fears to rest. The vaccines seem to work well in patients with a wide range of solid and liquid tumors, according to the large analysis.

But 15 percent of those who had blood cancers and 30 percent of those who took drugs that suppress the immune system had no detectable antibodies after the second dose. Dr. Halmos said he and his colleagues were eager to test whether a third dose could benefit those individuals, but have not yet been able to gain access to the vaccines.

Dr. Segev’s team found in an earlier study that less than half of 658 organ transplant recipients had measurable antibodies after both doses of an mRNA vaccine made by Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna. But to follow up on the finding, they had to resort to recruiting volunteers like Ms. Jones who had obtained third doses on their own.

The scientists found that a third dose amped up antibody levels in all 30 organ transplant recipients who had low or undetectable levels of antibodies.

Ms. Jones said many people like her felt they had been abandoned by the federal government — especially with the threat of more contagious variants circulating in the United States.

Some members of a Facebook group for immunocompromised people desperate for protection have gotten a third dose at mass vaccination sites where providers don’t check records, or have even crossed state lines, she said. Even so, most continue to wear masks to protect themselves — and have sometimes had to endure harassment as a result.

“It really saddens me that so many people in this world have made masking like, this super political thing when it should never have been,” she said. “It makes it so it’s harder for us to take care of ourselves.”

Categories
Health

CureVac to ‘plow ahead’ with Covid vaccine regardless of trial outcomes     

An employee of the German biopharmaceutical company CureVac will demonstrate research on a vaccine against the coronavirus (COVID-19) disease in a laboratory in Tübingen on March 12, 2020.

Andreas Gebert | REUTERS

LONDON – CureVac plans to continue work on its Covid-19 vaccine despite disappointing results from clinical studies showing the vaccine is only 48% effective.

The German biotech company released its final analysis of the clinical trials of its coronavirus vaccine – known as CVnCoV – on Wednesday, confirming that the vaccine was 48% effective against Covid of all degrees of severity in all ages and 15 variants.

Pierre Kemula, CFO of CureVac, however, defended the vaccine on CNBC Thursday, saying the clinical trials were conducted at a time when several new strains of the virus were spreading around the world.

“We have to speak to the EMA now [European Medicines Agency] and want to make sure we have an open dialogue and share any data we have to assess the way forward, “he told CNBC’s Squawk Box Europe on Thursday.

When asked if it is worth developing the vaccine further when other successful vaccines are already in use in Europe and elsewhere, Kemula said the company had contractual obligations to meet.

“We have a contract with the European Commission to supply 225 million doses of the drug, so I think we need to move forward on that,” he said.

“There are a lot of vaccinations, there are a lot of people under 60 who haven’t had access to the vaccine before. So if we can contribute to the fight – in the short term in the pandemic, but also in the medium term with these other ways of [multivalents] … we are continuing to work on that. “Multivalent or polyvalent vaccines should immunize against more than one virus strain.

The results of the CureVac study, which enrolled 40,000 participants in ten countries in Latin America and Europe, showed that the vaccine was more effective in younger participants. The effectiveness rate among 18 to 60 year olds was 53% for diseases of any severity and increased to 77% for moderate and severe diseases in the same age group.

However, given that Covid-19 carries a higher risk for the elderly, the study results are disappointing, not least because two other vaccines made with messenger RNA (mRNA) – those from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna – have an efficacy greater than 90 % of have been shown to prevent Covid-19 infection. CureVac’s shares fell as much as 13% in Thursday’s pre-trading session.

Dr. Franz-Werner Haas, CEO of CureVac, defended the results in a statement on Wednesday, saying the vaccine “shows strong public health value” for those aged 18 to 60 and will be an “important contributor to tackling Covid.” -19 pandemic and the dynamic distribution of variants. “

He also cited “the current context of an increasingly diverse environment of Covid-19 variants”.

Several variants have emerged over the course of the pandemic, some of which are more virulent than others – like the alpha variant first discovered in the UK and the delta variant first identified in India – and Kemula said he believed mutations would continue to occur.

“As more and more people become infected with coronavirus, we are prepared for the disease to continue to develop as it progresses and has more and more variants,” said Kemula. The industry must think ahead, “how we can cope better with the current vaccines, but also possibly with various boosters (booster vaccinations),” he added.

Categories
Health

Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Protects In opposition to Delta Variant, Firm Experiences

Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine is still effective eight months after being vaccinated against the highly contagious Delta variant, the company reported Thursday – a result that should reassure the 11 million Americans who received the vaccination.

The vaccine showed a slight decrease in effectiveness against the variant compared to its effectiveness against the original virus, the company said. But the vaccine was more effective against the Delta variant than the beta variant, which was first identified in South Africa – the pattern was also seen with mRNA vaccines.

Antibodies stimulated by the vaccine get stronger over time, researchers also reported.

The results were described in a press release, and the company announced that both studies were submitted for online publication on Thursday. One of these studies was accepted for publication in a scientific journal. Both studies are small, and the researchers said they published the results early because of the great public interest.

“The coverage of the variants will be better than expected,” said Dr. Dan Barouch, a virologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. “There was a lot of misinformation out there so we decided we had to get this public right away.”

The intense discourse about Delta’s threat has made even immunized people worry about whether they are protected. The variant first identified in India is much more transmissible than previous versions of the virus, and its global spread has resulted in new health restrictions from Ireland to Malaysia.

In the USA, the variant now accounts for every fourth new infection. Public health officials said the vaccines approved in the United States will work against all existing variants, but the data is primarily based on studies of the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

That made some people who received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine ask, What about us?

The frustration built before the Delta variant appeared. For example, the guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that vaccinated people could do without masks in many indoor situations were mainly based on data for mRNA vaccines. And reports of an accumulation of infections among players on the Yankees baseball team that the J. & J. Shot did nothing to allay fears that the vaccine might be inferior to others.

Martha Young, 63, of Mountain View, California received the J. & J. shot on April 9th. It wasn’t their first choice, but it was offered. But since then she has said, “I’m very, very frustrated with the lack of information.”

She added, referring to the J. & J. “I felt like I didn’t count, like I was statistically insignificant because so few of us stand a chance that we don’t have to worry about us.”

Some people familiar with the J. & J. Vaccine complained that they felt cheated by experts who said the vaccines were all equally good. “I was surprised to see others make that claim,” said Natalie Dean, biostatistician at the University of Florida. “I did not like it. People don’t want to feel misled. “

However, other experts said the clinical trials should have shown that the J. & J. Vaccine was lower than that of the mRNA vaccines. “Of course, 72 percent is less than 95 or 94 percent,” says Florian Krammer, an immunologist at the Icahn School of Medicine on Mount Sinai in New York.

Part of the difficulty with comparing the vaccines is that they were all tested individually and with different measures of success. The Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna studies were designed to capture symptomatic infections, while the J. & J. Study looked at the prevention of moderate to severe infections by the vaccine.

Still, it’s clear that all vaccines keep people out of the intensive care unit and morgue far more effectively than scientists could hope for, said Danny Altmann, an immunologist at Imperial College London.

Updated

July 1, 2021, 10:13 p.m. ET

“It’s like arguing whether you want a Ferrari or a Porsche that goes 250 or 180 mph on a road that is only allowed to drive 30 miles an hour,” he said.

However, there are differences: The J. & J. The vaccine can allow more so-called breakthrough infections – which occur in people who are fully vaccinated – with mild to no symptoms than the mRNA vaccines.

People with asymptomatic infections are very unlikely to spread the virus, but their diagnosis can become a problem when they’re caught by routine tests – as was the case with the Yankees cluster – and they have to go into quarantine, said John Moore, one Virologist at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York.

Information on the effectiveness of the J. & J. The vaccine was slow to get to market because it was launched later and its use was suspended due to concerns about infrequent blood clots. Many medical centers and hospitals offered staff the mRNA vaccines early on and were able to conduct studies to evaluate these vaccines.

But blood samples from people who were tested with the J. & J. Vaccines are a comparatively rare commodity, said Dr. Krammer. “It’s not that nobody cares, or we’re hiding something because the vaccine isn’t good,” he said. “It’s more of an access problem.”

In the absence of data, some experts had suggested that the J. & J. Vaccination against the Delta variant probably performed about as well as the AstraZeneca vaccine, which is widely used in Europe. But this vaccine is given in two doses compared to J. & J’s single dose.

“The thing that I do at J. & J. is that their technology platform is essentially very, very similar – almost indistinguishable from AstraZeneca, ”said Dr. Altmann. “Should it really be a two-dose vaccine like everything else?”

The single dose offers benefits for those with limited access or who do not want two doses for other reasons. The J. & J. The vaccine also lasts longer in the refrigerator than the others and was a welcome option earlier in the pandemic when vaccines were scarce.

But after the advent of variants like Beta and Delta, which seem to bypass the immune system in part, the discussion about boosters for J. & J. Receiver intensified. One dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine is much less effective against variants than two doses, and experts feared that J. & J. Shot could be similar.

The new study addressed some of these concerns.

While blood antibody levels produced after immunization with Pfizer or Moderna decrease after an initial increase, antibodies – and immune cells – are released by the J. & J. Vaccine remains at a high level. (Other studies have shown that immune responses generated by mRNA vaccines are likely to last for years, too.)

A lack of information about the J. & J. Vaccine had led many people to speculate that it might need to be supplemented with a dose of an mRNA vaccine. But at least for now, people who have the J. & J. Vaccine shouldn’t need a booster shot, nor can they legally get one, “unless they’re playing the system, unless they pretend they’re vaccine naïve and get an mRNA vaccine and are essentially lying,” said Dr . Moore, “and I certainly … don’t recommend people do that.”

Categories
Health

As Covid Rages, Putin Pushes Russians to Get a (Russian) Vaccine

MOSCOW — President Vladimir V. Putin urged Russians to get vaccinated against the coronavirus on Wednesday — his most extensive comments on the matter yet — as his country scrambles to contain a vicious new wave of the illness.

Speaking at his annual televised call-in show, Mr. Putin spent the opening half-hour trying to convince Russians to get one of the country’s four domestically produced shots. It was the latest instance of a marked change in tone about the pandemic from Russian officials, who for months did little to push a vaccine-wary public to get immunized but are now starting to make vaccination mandatory for some groups.

“It’s dangerous, dangerous to your life,” Mr. Putin said of Covid-19. “The vaccine is not dangerous.”

Only 23 million Russians, or about 15 percent of the population, have received at least one vaccine dose, Mr. Putin said. Polls this year by the independent Levada Center showed that some 60 percent of Russians did not want to be vaccinated. Analysts attribute Russians’ hesitancy to a widespread distrust of the authorities combined with a drumbeat of state television reports that described the coronavirus as either mostly defeated or not very dangerous to begin with.

Mr. Putin revealed that he himself had received the Sputnik V vaccine this year — the Kremlin had previously refused to specify which shot he had been given — and that he had experienced a brief fever after the second dose. But his message remained muddled, as he questioned the safety of Covid-19 vaccines in general.

“Thank God we haven’t had tragic situations after vaccinations like after the use of AstraZeneca or Pfizer,” Mr. Putin said.

Mr. Putin spoke just as his handling of the pandemic — long touted by the Kremlin as superior to the approach taken in the West — threatened to turn into a major debacle. While Russia’s Sputnik V vaccine is widely seen as safe and effective, most Russians have been avoiding it and other available, domestically produced shots. As a result, the country is suffering through a harrowing new wave of the pandemic, with the delta variant of the coronavirus spreading fast.

Russia’s biggest cities, Moscow and St. Petersburg, have been reporting more than 100 deaths per day recently, setting records; nationwide, the number of reported new cases per day has doubled to more than 20,000 in recent weeks, with 669 deaths reported on Wednesday. The official toll is likely to be a significant undercount.

Regional officials in Moscow and elsewhere have resisted lockdowns. But, almost certainly with Mr. Putin’s blessing, they have made vaccination mandatory for large groups of people in their regions, such as service workers. That has prompted an outcry from many Kremlin critics and supporters alike.

“I don’t support mandatory vaccination, and continue to have this point of view,” Mr. Putin said, putting the responsibility for such orders on regional officials.

Updated 

June 30, 2021, 9:29 p.m. ET

The renewed surge of the coronavirus could derail the Kremlin’s message of competence in comparison to Western dysfunction just as parliamentary elections approach in September. Mr. Putin’s most vocal opponents have already been jailed, exiled or barred from running, but obvious election fraud or a poor showing by his governing United Russia party could still weaken the president’s domestic authority.

Mr. Putin’s annual call-in show, first broadcast in 2001, has turned into a bedrock of how he has communicated with Russians during two decades of rule. More than a million questions were submitted ahead of time by phone, text message and smartphone app, state news media reported. They covered things like the cost of airline tickets, problems with building regulations, illegal logging and high food prices.

The lengthy session affords the president a chance to show that he is in charge, in command of the details of a plethora of issues and concerned about the welfare of regular Russians. It also allows him to blame problems on lower-level officials, while casting himself as the savior of the common citizen.

But it has also underlined the weakness of the top-down system of governance over which Mr. Putin presides. To solve even the most minor issues, it seems, Mr. Putin himself sometimes needs to get involved.

For instance, after a sheep breeder in the Caucasus republic of Ingushetia told Mr. Putin that he had been having trouble finding a plot of land to rent, the president pledged to speak to the region’s governor.

“Sheep breeding is very important,” Mr. Putin said. “People who do this deserve support.”

Mr. Putin spent much of the show focused on domestic issues. He shot down online rumors of new fees for farmers, pledging that “no one is planning a tax on livestock.” A woman’s smartphone video from a grocery store showed the high cost of carrots and other staples. Mr. Putin pledged to address the matter, noting that it was a global problem and that “the vegetable harvest is soon, and I hope this will have an impact on prices.”

But Mr. Putin was at his most animated when he was asked about geopolitics. Responding to a question about Ukraine, he repeated his oft-stated contention that Russians and Ukrainians were “one people” and that the country had turned into a puppet of the United States. He rejected another viewer’s idea that last week’s incident surrounding a British warship approaching Crimea could have touched off World War III.

But he warned that any attempt by the West to build up a military presence in Ukraine, Russia’s biggest western neighbor, would pose an existential threat.

“This creates significant problems for us in the security sphere,” Mr. Putin said. “This touches the existential interests of the Russian Federation and the Russian people.”

Some of the questions during the nearly four-hour show came as live phone or video calls, while others were prerecorded videos. Mr. Putin at times appeared confused as to whether or not a question was being asked in real time, talking back at some of the recorded videos. After some technical difficulties about two hours in, the hosts said that the show was coming under a denial-of-service cyberattack.

“Everyone talks about Russian hackers,” one of the hosts quipped.

Oleg Matsnev contributed reporting.

Categories
Health

Johnson & Johnson Covid vaccine might shield individuals in opposition to the delta variant

U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy told CNBC on Wednesday there is reason to be hopeful that people who received the single-shot Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 vaccine may be protected against the virus’ delta variant.

Murthy pointed to data that showed the Oxford-AstraZeneca shot is highly effective against hospitalization from the more contagious variant. He also said people should think of the AstraZeneca vaccine “as a cousin” to J&J’s shot since it was “built on a similar platform.”

“While we are still awaiting direct studies of Johnson & Johnson and the delta variant, we have reasons to be hopeful, because the J&J vaccine has proven to be quite effective against preventing hospitalizations and deaths, with all the variants that we’ve seen to date,” Murthy told “The News with Shepard Smith.”

World Health Organization officials urged fully vaccinated people to continue to wear masks, social distance and practice other pandemic-related safety measures as the delta variant spreads across the globe.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, however, affirmed Wednesday that it’s leaving it up to states and local health officials to set guidelines around mask-wearing.

Murthy said the CDC guidance was based on giving people flexibility.

“The CDC, in its guidance, essentially, was giving people flexibility and choice but wanted people to know that, if you are fully vaccinated, your risk of getting this virus or passing it on is low, which is why it said masks are not required indoors or outdoors, if you are fully vaccinated,” Murthy said. 

Authorized vaccines from Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech and Johnson & Johnson have demonstrated to be highly effective in preventing Covid, especially against severe disease and death.

Categories
Health

Behind Biden’s Pledge to Share 80 Million Vaccine Doses

WASHINGTON – When an airliner carrying 2.5 million doses of the coronavirus vaccine took off from Moderna from Dallas to Islamabad, Pakistan on Wednesday, federal officials had just gone through a dizzying bureaucratic back and forth getting them there.

The United States had a donation agreement with Moderna and Covax, the longstanding vaccine exchange initiative. Covax had previously entered into indemnity agreements with Moderna that protect the company from liability for possible damage caused by the vaccine. Officials at the American embassy in Islamabad had worked with regulators there to assess the Food and Drug Administration’s review of the vaccine; Pakistani regulators had to sift through tons of materials on the vaccine batches and the factory that made them before approving their use there.

Once signed, the result was what is known as a tripartite agreement: a type of agreement that increasingly engages the Biden government’s pandemic response efforts and underscores how the demand for vaccines in the United States is lagging as many countries seek help ask of those who have a surplus.

Amid criticism from some public health experts that President Biden’s vaccine diplomacy has been slow and inadequate, the White House plans to announce Thursday that it has fulfilled the president’s pledge to distribute 80 million doses by June 30 around 50 countries, the African Union and the Caribbean consortium of 20 nations have been officially offered, with around half already delivered and the rest planned in the coming weeks, said Natalie Quillian, the Biden government’s deputy Covid-19 response coordinator .

The dose-sharing effort has become an ongoing activity across the federal government, with alternate-level meetings several times a week and daily operational reviews. The White House can hold up to 15 country-specific calls a day, starting at 7 a.m., often to the National Security Council, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of State and Defense, and other agencies.

Approximately 75 percent of the doses are routed through Covax, which has delivered more than 91 million doses to both affluent and low-income countries. The rest is distributed through bilateral agreements that allow countries to retrieve and distribute cans more directly.

Researchers have estimated that 11 billion doses of vaccines are needed worldwide to potentially eradicate the coronavirus pandemic. In the past few months, tens of millions of doses of the three federally approved vaccines in the United States have gone unused, and more have come off the supply lines. White House officials said they wanted to ensure adequate supplies to Americans this spring before completing the overseas shipping overseas work.

To date, more than three billion vaccine doses have been administered worldwide, which is 40 doses per 100 people. Some countries have not yet reported a single dose, although the highly contagious Delta variant is spreading around the world, exposing other inequalities.

“If this is the pace at which it is continuing, then unfortunately it is much slower than necessary,” said Dr. Saad B. Omer, the director of the Yale Institute for Global Health, on the US effort.

Ms. Quillian said more doses would be shipped over the summer, in addition to the 500 million doses of the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine the Biden government promised this month to distribute to about 100 countries next year. She described this phase of vaccination diplomacy as procedurally more complex than the domestic vaccination program. Challenges with bilateral agreements, such as the three million doses of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine sent to Brazil last week, include: the recipient country is negotiating compensation agreements with the manufacturers.

When the cans destined for Pakistan were declared for shipping last week, attention shifted to packaging and transportation to the Dallas airport. The health authorities in Pakistan and an organization behind Covax – UNICEF, the United Nations Children’s Fund – will deliver it, an effort the Biden government wants to oversee. Less than two percent of the Pakistani population are fully vaccinated.

Dr. Hilary D. Marston, a member of the government’s Covid-19 Response Team and a former National Security Council and National Institutes of Health official who helped coordinate supplies, said the State Department and Centers for Control of Disease and Prevention had also worked with Pakistani officials to find out how many doses the country could store.

Pakistan is an obvious candidate for a vaccine donation, Ms. Quillian said. As a neighbor of India, which faced a devastating spike in virus cases this spring, Pakistan has likely been affected by the spread of the Delta variant, which was first identified in India. But the wider list of countries the United States has sent vaccines to required more consideration.

Updated

June 30, 2021, 6:05 p.m. ET

Jake Sullivan, the White House national security adviser, said at a news conference earlier this month that the government was initially prioritizing neighbors of the United States and Asian countries with spikes in virus cases.

The sharing of cans can sometimes appear to be an international matchmaking scheme. Some countries have requested the vaccine from Johnson & Johnson due to simpler storage requirements and its attractiveness as a one shot shot. Others have already approved one or more of the vaccines used in the US, which speeds up the process.

“Any country we offered a vaccine to,” said Ms. Quillian, “if they asked for a specific type, we were able to accommodate that request.”

Officials can still face significant hurdles. Since the donated cans were manufactured and sold according to American legal and official procedures, they must be approved separately by the recipient countries. The process often involves working out kinks with overseas regulators.

The use of Covax doses can sometimes stall, as in South Sudan and Congo, both of which put some of the initiative back due to logistical problems and vaccine reluctance. There have been clearer successes in bilateral agreements that the US has already negotiated. South Korea, which received a million doses of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine from the United States, reported that it used up 99.8 percent of the doses in just a few weeks, White House officials said.

Dr. Omer said that because of the time it takes vaccines to elicit an immune response, targeting donations to countries with outbreaks is insufficient.

“It has been six months, even since the vaccination program started, that we had some substantial movement on this issue,” he said of the dose-sharing campaign.

Ms. Quillian defended the government’s timing. “It’s hard to remember three months, or even February or January. We didn’t have enough vaccine for this country, ”she said. “The president wanted to make sure that we can take care of ourselves first and show that it can work here, and then we always wanted to share when we have surpluses.”

The government of Biden, said Dr. Omer said he needed to rely more on the CDC’s expertise in global vaccination campaigns, including its success in organizing the distribution of polio vaccines.

Dr. Michael H. Merson, professor of global health at Duke University and former director of the World Health Organization’s global program on AIDS, said a useful model for distributing vaccines overseas was the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Aid, or Pepfar. who worked with The Global Fund to provide, administer, and monitor the safety of antiretroviral drugs.

The CDC’s disease outbreak prediction operations recently received a financial boost from Mr Biden’s American rescue plan, which would enhance the White House’s efforts to identify potential virus hotspots overseas, White House officials said. A more organized program to do this work is underway, they said.

Categories
Health

Moderna says Covid vaccine exhibits promise in a lab setting towards variants, together with delta

A healthcare worker prepares a dose of Moderna Inc.’s Covid-19 vaccine on Tuesday February 9, 2021 at the Pacheco Vaccination Center in Brussels, Belgium.

Geert Vanden Wijngaert | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Moderna said Tuesday that its Covid-19 vaccine showed promise against coronavirus variants, including the highly contagious Delta variant, first identified in India in a laboratory setting.

The two-dose mRNA vaccine produced neutralizing antibodies against Delta as well as Beta and Eta, variants that Moderna said were first found in South Africa and Nigeria, respectively.

The company said the results were based on blood serum from eight participants one week after receiving the second dose of the vaccine. The data has not yet been reviewed by experts. The results, while promising, may not reflect how the vaccines actually perform against the variants in real-world scenarios.

Moderna shares rose more than 4% in intraday trading after the lab results were announced.

“We continue to strive to investigate new variants, generate data and share them as they become available,” said Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna, in a press release. “These new data are encouraging and reinforce our belief that the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine should continue to protect against newly discovered variants.”

Moderna’s update comes days after World Health Organization officials urged fully vaccinated people to continue wearing masks, maintain social distance, and practice other pandemic safety measures as the delta spreads rapidly across the world.

Delta, now present in at least 92 countries including the United States, is expected to become the predominant variant of the disease worldwide. In the US, the prevalence of the variant doubles about every two weeks.

WHO officials said Friday that they are urging fully vaccinated people to continue to “play it safe” as much of the world remains unvaccinated and highly contagious variants like Delta spread in many countries and cause outbreaks.

The comments were a departure from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which said fully vaccinated Americans can be maskless in most environments.

“People can’t feel safe just because they got the two doses. They still need to protect themselves,” said Dr. Mariangela Simao, WHO Deputy Director General for Access to Medicines and Health Products, during a press conference.

Approved vaccines from Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Johnson & Johnson have been shown to be highly effective in preventing Covid, particularly against serious illness and death.

Some variants, including Delta, have shown the vaccines to be slightly less effective, and WHO officials said they fear people vaccinated could become part of the chains of transmission.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that about half of the adults infected in a Delta variant outbreak in Israel were fully vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine, prompting the local government to reintroduce indoor masking and other measures.

In the United States, President Joe Biden warned that unvaccinated people are particularly at risk of contracting Delta.

He said the number of Covid deaths would continue to increase across the country due to the spread of the “dangerous” variant, calling this a “serious concern”.

“More than six hundred thousand Americans have died, and with this variant of the Delta, you know there will be others too. You know it will happen. We need to vaccinate young people,” Biden said Thursday at a community center in Raleigh, NC

Categories
Health

UK carefully watched with its vaccine program and surge in circumstances

New Yorkers, 12 and older, will be vaccinated on June 13, 2021 at the St. Anthony of Padua Roman Catholic Church in the Bronx of New York City, United States.

Tayfun Coskun | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

LONDON – The UK has one of the highest Covid-19 vaccination rates in the world but is seeing a new surge in coronavirus cases, largely due to the Delta variant, which originally came from India.

Experts say the latest UK data will be given a lot of attention as it could be an editorial for others. And there are fears that where the UK is now performing, others – like the US – may follow suit.

“All eyes (are) on the UK Covid trends,” said Kallum Pickering, Senior Economist and Director of Berenberg Bank, in a statement on Tuesday.

“Great Britain, with its high vaccination rate but an increasing number of infections recorded daily, has developed into a test case for whether a mass vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 can bring” [an] End of the repeated cycles of lockdowns and other harsh social distancing protocols that have had a devastating impact on the global economy since the pandemic began in early 2019, “he said.

Pickering noted that medical data suggests that the UK’s high vaccination rate has severely weakened the link between registered Covid infections and complications from the disease, which supports the bank’s claim that “Britain can weather the new wave of infections without having to tighten the restrictions and “with only limited economic damage.”

Pickering said the data indicated that this wave of infections was different from the previous ones, with the number of registered infections increasing more slowly than the previous wave, and that despite the increase in cases, there has been no clear increase in deaths.

Second, he found that new admissions to the hospital had risen less than the registered infections – and much less than during the winter wave.

Reopening on track?

Deutsche Bank research strategist Jim Reid noted on Wednesday that while there is “persistent concern” about the spread of the Delta variant, “the only good news is that the age distribution of cases in the latest wave has moved significantly lower compared to the previous “. Waves.”

Younger age groups are affected by the virus much less often than older people. But the longer the boys remain unvaccinated or partially vaccinated, the virus is allowed to spread and possibly more variants can emerge.

So far, the vaccines have been shown to be resistant to new variants and remain largely effective in preventing serious Covid-19 for fully vaccinated people. An analysis published by Public Health England last Monday found that two doses of the Pfizer BioNTech or AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccines were highly effective against hospitalizations from the Delta variant.

In order to fully vaccinate more people, the UK government has postponed the lifting of the remaining Covid restrictions in England until July 19. She has insisted that the lifting of restrictions on that date is still on track despite the proliferation of the Delta variant.

“The risk that the reopening could be reversed remains low,” said Pickering von Berenberg.

“The UK is far from where medical capacity could be stretched to the point where new restrictions would be required,” he noted, adding that the continued rapid introduction of vaccines in the coming weeks could even lead to that the daily infections run on a plateau before it falls afterwards.

“While the pandemic is far from over and potential new variants that render the current generation of vaccines ineffective are a serious risk, recent virus and vaccine developments support our positive economic outlook for the UK and other advanced economies,” he said.

Winter wave?

What will come later this year when the flu season starts is more uncertain. England’s chief medical officer warned last week that the coming winter will continue to be difficult for the country’s health system despite the country’s successful coronavirus vaccination program.

In a speech to the NHS Confederation last Thursday, England Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty said the current wave of Covid infections due to the Delta variant is likely to be followed by a further surge in winter.

Covid-19 “didn’t bring us its final surprise and there will be a few more [variants] over the next period, “he said, according to Sky News. He added that it would likely be five years before there are vaccines that could highly” hold the line “against a range of coronavirus variants.

And until then, new vaccination programs and booster vaccinations are necessary. Some countries, like the US and UK, have already signaled that they could introduce Covid-19 booster vaccinations within a year, but pressure is mounting on governments to mobilize refresher programs – not an easy task given the ongoing uncertainties surrounding the pandemic , Vaccines and variants.

Categories
Health

Questioning if the Covid Vaccine Labored? Get the Proper Check, on the Proper Time

Now that tens of millions of Americans are vaccinated against the coronavirus, many are wondering: Do I have enough antibodies to keep me safe?

For a vast majority of people, the answer is yes. That hasn’t stopped hordes from stampeding to the local doc-in-a-box for antibody testing. But to get a reliable answer from testing, vaccinated people have to get a specific kind of test, and at the right time.

Take the test too soon, or rely on one that looks for the wrong antibodies — all too easy to do, given the befuddling array of tests now available — and you may believe yourself to still be vulnerable when you are not.

Actually, scientists would prefer that the average vaccinated person not get antibody testing at all, on the grounds that it’s unnecessary. In clinical trials, the vaccines authorized in the United States provoked a strong antibody response in virtually all of the participants.

“Most people shouldn’t even be worrying about this,” said Akiko Iwasaki, an immunologist at Yale University.

But antibody tests can be crucial for people with weak immune systems or those who take certain medications — a broad category encompassing millions of people who are recipients of organ donations, have certain blood cancers, or who take steroids or other drugs that suppress the immune system. Mounting evidence suggests that a significant proportion of these people do not produce a sufficient antibody response after vaccination.

If you must get tested, or just want to, it’s essential to get the right kind of test, Dr. Iwasaki said: “I feel a little bit hesitant to recommend everybody getting tested, because unless they really understood what the test is doing, people might get this wrong sense of not having developed any antibodies.”

Early in the pandemic, many commercial tests were designed to look for antibodies to a coronavirus protein called the nucleocapsid, or just N, because after infection, those antibodies were plentiful in the blood.

But these antibodies are not as powerful as those required to prevent virus infection, nor do they last as long. More important, antibodies to the N protein are not produced by the vaccines authorized in the United States; instead, those vaccines provoke antibodies to another protein sitting on the surface of the virus, called the spike.

If people who were never infected are vaccinated and then are tested for antibodies to the N protein instead of to the spike, they may be in for a rude shock.

Credit…David Lat

David Lat, a 46-year-old legal writer in Manhattan, was hospitalized for Covid-19 for three weeks in March 2020, and he chronicled most of his illness and recovery on Twitter.

Over the following year, Mr. Lat was tested for antibodies numerous times — when he went to his pulmonologist or cardiologist for follow-ups, for example, or to donate plasma. His antibody levels were high in June 2020 but steadily fell over the following months.

Updated 

June 20, 2021, 9:45 p.m. ET

The decline “didn’t worry me,” Mr. Lat recalled recently. “I had been told to expect that they would naturally wane, but I was just happy that I was still positive.”

Mr. Lat was fully vaccinated by March 22 of this year. But an antibody test on April 21, ordered by his cardiologist, was barely positive. Mr. Lat was stunned: “I would have thought a month after being immunized, I would have antibodies through the roof.”

Mr. Lat turned to Twitter for an explanation. Florian Krammer, an immunologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, responded, asking Mr. Lat which test had been used. “That’s when I looked at the fine print on the test,” Mr. Lat said. He realized it was a test for antibodies to the N protein, not to the spike.

“It seems that by default, they just give you the nucleocapsid one,” Mr. Lat said. “I never thought to ask for a different one.”

In May, the Food and Drug Administration recommended against the use of antibody tests for assessing immunity — a decision that has drawn criticism from some scientists — and provided only bare-bones information about testing to health care providers. Many doctors are still unaware of the differences between antibody tests, or the fact that the tests measure just one form of immunity to the virus.

Rapid tests that are commonly available deliver a yes-no result and may miss low levels of antibodies. A certain type of lab test, called an Elisa test, may offer a semi-quantitative estimate of antibodies to the spike protein.

It’s also important to wait to be tested at least two weeks after the second shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines, when antibody levels will have risen enough to be detectable. For some people receiving the Johnson and Johnson vaccine, that period may be as long as four weeks.

“It’s the timing and the antigen and the sensitivity of the assay — these are going to be very important,” Dr. Iwasaki said.

In November, the World Health Organization set standards for antibody testing, allowing for comparison of different tests. “There’s a lot of good tests out there now,” Dr. Krammer said. “Little by little, all these manufacturers, all these places that run them are adapting to international units.”

Antibodies are just one aspect of immunity, noted Dr. Dorry Segev, a transplant surgeon and researcher at Johns Hopkins University: “There’s a lot happening under the surface that antibody tests are not directly measuring.” The body also maintains so-called cellular immunity, a complex network of defenders that also responds to invaders.

Still, for someone who is vaccinated but immunocompromised, it may be very helpful to know that protection against the virus isn’t what it should be, he said. For example, a transplant patient with poor antibody levels might be able to use test results to convince an employer that he or she should continue to work remotely.

Mr. Lat has not sought another test. Just learning that the vaccine most likely has given him a fresh increase of antibodies, despite his test results, was reassurance enough: “I trust that the vaccines work.”

Categories
Health

Sen. Warren presses PhRMA foyer group on efforts to dam vaccine patent waivers

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., conducts a news conference outside the Capitol to reintroduce the Universal Child Care and Early Learning Act, on Tuesday, April 27, 2021.

Tom Williams | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren is pressing the CEO of a major pharmaceutical trade group on its lobbying efforts against a proposal to waive intellectual property rights for Covid-19 vaccines that would help boost production of the shots for poorer nations.

Warren and other lawmakers asked how much money the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, or PhRMA, and its member companies spent this year lobbying Congress and White House officials in opposition to the waiver, in a letter sent Wednesday to PhRMA CEO Stephen Ubl that was obtained by CNBC.

The Biden administration said in early May it would support waiving the World Trade Organization’s Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights, or TRIPs, agreement. PhRMA, whose members include Covid vaccine makers AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson, is trying to block the waiver.

Removing patent protections on Covid vaccines would allow other drug companies to manufacture the lifesaving shots. Drugmakers worry that could set a precedent for future products and end their lucrative monopolies over sales of their new medicines.

Warren also asked the trade group about its attempts to block a bill from House Democrats that would allow Medicare to negotiate directly with manufacturers for lower drug prices.

“PhRMA and other pharmaceutical companies have pushed the Biden Administration to oppose the TRIPS waiver, arguing that it would “undermine the global response to the pandemic,”‘ Warren and other lawmakers wrote. The industry also said drug pricing provisions of the American Rescue Plan would “lead to fewer new cures and treatments,” and it opposed Medicare Part D price negotiation, the letter reads.

“While taking credit for the development of new COVID vaccines — which were developed with massive infusions of federal funds — the pharmaceutical industry has not backed off of its efforts to block drug pricing proposals and maintain the status quo,” the lawmakers added.

The lawmakers gave the trade group until June 30 to respond.

In a statement to CNBC, PhRMA spokesman Brian Newell said the trade group was reviewing the letter.

“We will continue our efforts to work with policymakers on solutions to lower what patients pay out of pocket for prescription medicines and ensure equitable global access to COVID-19 vaccines,” he said.

Warren’s letter comes as global groups, including the World Health Organization, are urging wealthy countries and drugmakers to get Covid shots to low-income and lower-middle-income countries, some of which are witnessing an increasingly worrying rise in new infections.

Ken Frazier, chairman and chief executive officer of Merck & Co., from left, Stephen Ubl, chief executive officer of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), and Robert Hugin, chairman of Celgene Corp., arrive to a news conference outside the White House following a meeting with U.S. President Donald Trump, not pictured, in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Tuesday, Jan. 31, 2017.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Many countries and drugmakers have made pledges to share millions of doses around the world. President Joe Biden announced last week that his administration would donate 500 million vaccine doses produced by Pfizer to other nations.

The pharmaceutical industry has previously said the TRIPS waiver would compromise safety, weaken supply chains and sow confusion between public and private partners.

In the first three months of this year, pharma companies have spent a record $92 million on lobbying, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan campaign finance research group in Washington. PhRMA spent $8.6 million this year on lobbying after spending $25.9 million in 2020, according to its data.