Categories
Business

YouTube Suspends Trump’s Channel for at Least Seven Days

OAKLAND, Calif. – YouTube announced Tuesday that President Trump’s channel had been banned because of concerns about the “ongoing potential for violence.” This was the latest move by one of the major tech companies to restrict the president online.

In a post on YouTube’s official Twitter account, Google’s own video page announced that Mr Trump’s account was banned after one of his recent videos violated the Incitement to Violence Policy.

That meant Mr Trump couldn’t upload any new content to his channel for at least seven days, which had around 2.8 million subscribers. YouTube also said it has indefinitely disabled all comments on its channel.

Older videos that did not violate any guidelines remained active on his channel.

Many tech companies have moved to curb Mr. Trump online since a violent presidential-instigated crowd of his supporters stormed the Capitol last week. Subsequently, Facebook suspended the president from Instagram and his core social network at least until the end of his term in office. Twitter followed by the permanent suspension of Mr. Trump’s account to deprive him of his favorite social media platform, which he had more than 88 million followers on. Other sites, like Snapchat, Reddit, and Twitch, have put Mr. Trump under pressure.

Big tech companies have also withdrawn support for other websites that host right-wing content. On Monday, Parler, a social networking site that had become popular with Trump supporters for its casual approach to freedom of expression, went dark after Amazon shut down computer services. Apple and Google had previously removed Parler from their app stores. Parler said they were looking for a way to get back online.

The moves were praised by liberals and others, who said the actions were long overdue because Mr Trump used the websites to spread falsehoods and incite violence. But conservatives have said that tech companies have censored Mr Trump and suppressed right-wing voices, raising questions about how much power tech companies have over online discourse.

The video that led to YouTube’s suspension comes from Mr. Trump’s remarks on Wednesday prior to a trip to Texas to visit a partially completed section of his long-promised wall along the Mexican border.

In his first address to reporters since last week’s events, Trump said that a speech he gave at a pre-riot rally in the Capitol was “entirely appropriate” and that Congress’s efforts to indict and condemn him “Anger would have enormous causes.”

YouTube’s seven-day suspension was an “important and necessary first step,” said Jim Steyer, executive director of Common Sense Media, a nonprofit news media monitoring group. “While it is disappointing that it took a Trump-instigated attack on our Capitol to get here, all major platforms seem to be finally rising,” he said.

During his presidency, Mr. Trump used YouTube differently from Twitter or Facebook. His YouTube channel is mostly filled with clips from speeches and rallies, as well as videos of supporters defending him on Fox News. The videos lack the carbon copy of his up-to-the-minute comment on Twitter and Facebook.

YouTube’s suspension comes after months of being pulled by the company. In the weeks following the November 3 election, Mr Trump’s channel was filled with videos showing him and his supporters questioning the outcome. YouTube refused to respond to these videos despite critics calling for it. The questioning of the election results is not a violation of his guidelines.

Last month, after most states confirmed their election results, YouTube announced it would remove videos that misleadingly stated that there had been widespread election fraud or election errors. However, the company said it would not punish channels for posting such content with suspensions until January 21, after inauguration day. YouTube said it removed thousands of videos spreading misinformation about the 2020 election.

Several videos were removed from Mr. Trump’s channel last week, including the one praising rioters and urging them to leave the Capitol. The Company, cited the spread of electoral misinformation.

A day later, YouTube removed the grace period and said it would “strike” channels for violating policies on election fraud. Channels that receive a strike will not be able to upload new videos for a week. After three strokes there can be a canal permanently banned from YouTube.

Categories
Business

Not in Trump’s ‘nature’ to do what’s proper for the U.S.,’ says Panetta

Former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta told CNBC’s “The News with Shepard Smith” that lawmakers on both sides of the aisle “need to be realistic” that President Donald Trump will not attempt to attract violent demonstrators in the days leading up to President-elect Joe Biden’s inauguration to discourage.

“This president won’t do that,” said Panetta, who served as secretary of defense under President Barack Obama from July 2011 to February 2013. “It is not in his nature to do something that is important to the country. He thinks of himself. That will continue to consume him.”

At the Save America rally on January 6, Trump told thousands of spectators on Capitol Hill that “we will never admit” and added strength to his supporters. Minutes later, a crowd of his supporters stormed Congress and terrorized it. Trump has since taken no responsibility for the deadly uprising and has defended his speech.

“People found what I said completely appropriate,” Trump told a group of reporters on Tuesday.

Trump’s comments come at a time of heightened alertness to violence in the US after the FBI warned of possible armed protests. In a Tuesday night interview on The News with Shepard Smith, Michael Chertoff, Secretary of Homeland Security during the Bush administration, said there was a “real threat” to hostility in the country’s capitals.

“I’m very worried about the next few weeks,” said Chertoff. “I think that next week will be a moment when these groups feel encouraged to go into chaos and attack not only the Capitol but other locations as well.” . “

A state of emergency was declared in Richmond, Virginia because authorities described the protests prior to Inauguration Day on January 20 as a “credible threat.” Virginia Capitol Police announced they were increasing security.

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers activated his state’s National Guard to protect the state’s Capitol and boarded up windows on the building’s ground floor. Michigan’s Attorney General Dana Nessel tweeted, “The Michigan Capitol is not safe.” Chertoff said he doesn’t expect the threats to stop after inauguration day.

“We could have active shooters, we could have pipe bombs, but honestly I think this will continue after January 20th,” said Chertoff. “I think these groups were brought up to believe that this is their moment.”

Panetta told host Shepard Smith that Trump must be “punished” last Wednesday for “instigating this uprising”. Trump is charged with rioting and House Democrats plan to vote Tuesday to demand that Vice President Mike Pence use the 25th amendment to remove Trump from office. Panetta said if Pence fails to implement the 25th Amendment, there will be no option but to impeach.

“That is the bottom line, we cannot ignore what happened last Wednesday and we must send a clear message to this president and future president that such behavior will never be tolerated in our country,” said Panetta.

Categories
Business

China Points New Guidelines Aimed toward Trump’s Sanctions

China fired back against the Trump administration on Saturday with new rules that would punish global corporations for complying with Washington’s tightened restrictions on doing business with Chinese companies.

The Chinese Ministry of Commerce said the rules, which came into effect immediately, were intended to counter foreign laws that “unfairly prohibit or restrict” people or companies in China from doing normal business. She said her actions are necessary to protect China’s national sovereignty and security, and to protect the rights of Chinese citizens and corporations.

Although Chinese officials didn’t mention a specific country, the new rules could potentially put global corporations in the middle of the Washington-Beijing economic struggles. They could also send a signal to the future administration of President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr., who ultimately has to decide whether to maintain, relax, or reconsider the Trump-era restrictions on Chinese companies.

As President Trump’s trade war against Chinese intensified, the Trump administration banned the sale of American technology to Huawei, the Chinese telecommunications giant, and other companies. Rules have also been passed punishing companies for their links with the Chinese military and for their involvement in Beijing’s surveillance and repression of predominantly Muslim ethnic minorities in northwest China’s Xinjiang region.

The new rules, released on Saturday, would allow Chinese officials and corporations to push back those who comply with these U.S. limits. The Chinese measures allow government officials to issue orders that companies are not required to comply with certain foreign restrictions.

Chinese companies that suffer losses as a result of another party’s compliance with these laws can seek damages in Chinese courts, according to the Ministry of Commerce. Such a case would likely lead to a victory for a Chinese plaintiff, as China’s courts are ultimately responsible to the Communist Party.

“This basically puts a lot of big companies between a rock and a hard place as they have to choose either to comply with US sanctions or comply with Chinese rules,” said Henry Gao, a Singapore Management University law professor who specializes in international Specialized in trading. “And either way, they’re going to lose one of their biggest markets.”

Economy & Economy

Updated

Jan. 8, 2021, 4:48 p.m. ET

It is unclear whether global companies in China will be penalized for complying with US sanctions. Under the rules enacted on Saturday, companies could apply to the Department of Commerce for a waiver to comply with American restrictions. They also require Chinese officials to set up an interacting body to determine which foreign laws fall within their scope.

In addition, much of the language of the regulation released on Saturday was vague, giving the Chinese government and businesses leeway for compliance. Still, the threat could lead large American companies doing business in China to press Mr. Biden to ease restrictions on Chinese companies. Mr Biden has not said whether he intends to press ahead with Mr Trump’s punitive actions that have contributed to the most toxic China-United States relationship in decades.

“China wants to stop the new administration from behaving like Trump,” said Professor Gao.

Under Mr Trump, Chinese companies found their access to the American market increasingly restricted. The government has banned companies around the world from using American software or machines designed by Huawei to make chips. It has imposed sanctions and blacklisted Chinese companies for systematic human rights abuses against Uyghurs and other Muslim ethnic minorities in Xinjiang.

Earlier this week, under pressure from the Trump administration and members of Congress, the New York Stock Exchange removed three major state-owned telecommunications companies from the stock exchange to comply with an executive order aimed at halting American investment in EU-affiliated companies in the Chinese military.

The new rules come just days after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo threatened additional sanctions against any person or organization involved in the recent round-up of dozens of pro-democracy figures in Hong Kong. It is not clear to what extent the new rules on restrictions might apply to Hong Kong, the Chinese city governed by its own laws but where Beijing has taken an increasingly stronger hand.

China has responded to American tariffs and sanctions with its own steps, but its actions have not been one-to-one. The United States is buying far more from China than it is selling to China, leaving Beijing with fewer opportunities to tax American goods.

The company also relies heavily on American products, including chips and software, and its economy depends in part on factories that manufacture goods for large American companies like Apple and General Motors.

Beijing has said little about its promise in 2019 to compile an “unreliable list” of foreign companies and individuals that could lead to further restrictions on business.

Categories
Politics

Trump’s Legacy: Voters Who Reject Democracy and Any Politics however Their Personal

Mr Hanna, 19, was an election worker in his rural community not far from Mr Biden’s native Scranton, and he cannot accept that Mr Biden won honestly.

“We were crowded, we had over 250 people in line,” he said, confidently adding that there were few Biden supporters. “It’s mind-boggling to believe that we go to bed and wake up 800,000 votes ahead, and after those magical ballots are dumped overnight, we kind of lose.”

This disinformation, which has spread widely online, has been exposed by election analysts who explain that mail-in ballots were counted more slowly over several days, greatly benefiting Mr Biden after the president made their use toxic to his supporters.

Robert Fuller of Georgia was so furious with the election that he foresaw an America would push off its deepest berths. “We’ll be lucky if we have another country after that,” he said, citing false allegations of electoral fraud that the president teased over the weekend during a taped call to Georgia’s top electoral officer, a Republican.

“I foresee a civil war, Republicans versus Democrats,” said Fuller. “You know as well as I do that you put the ballots in the states of Georgia, Nevada, Arizona, and Michigan.”

In Tuesday’s Georgia Senate runoff election, 65-year-old Fuller supported Republicans Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, who both lost. The winners – Rev. Raphael Warnock, who will be the first black Senator from Georgia, and Jon Ossoff, who will be the youngest member of the Senate – secured control of the Democratic Chamber.

Mr. Fuller believes none of the winners are legitimate. Not because they didn’t win the most votes, but because of their political views, which were caricatured far left of the center during the race.

Categories
Business

Trump’s Twitter Account Completely Suspended

OAKLAND, Calif. – Twitter announced on Friday that it had permanently suspended President Trump “because of the risk of further incitement to violence”, effectively cutting him off from his favorite megaphone to reach the public and a range of actions to end mainstream sites in order to limit its online reach.

Twitter said in a blog post that Mr. Trump’s personal @ realDonaldTrump account, which has more than 88 million followers, would be banned immediately. The company said two tweets Mr Trump posted on Friday – one calling his supporters “patriots” and another saying he would not go to the President’s inauguration on Jan. 20 – violated its rules against the glorification of violence.

The tweets “most likely encouraged and inspired people to repeat the criminal acts that took place in the US Capitol on January 6, 2021,” said Twitter, referring to the storming of the Capitol by a bunch of Trump loyalists.

Within minutes, Mr. Trump’s Twitter account was no longer accessible. His contributions were replaced by a label: “Account blocked.”

Mr Trump attempted to evade the ban late Friday by using the @POTUS Twitter account owned by the incumbent US president and other accounts to attack the company. But almost all of his messages were removed from Twitter almost immediately. The company prohibits users from avoiding being banned with secondary accounts.

The moves were a staunch rejection of Mr. Trump on Twitter, who had used the platform to build his base and spread his messages, which were often filled with falsehoods and threats. Mr Trump regularly tweeted dozens of times a day and sent a flurry of messages early morning or late evening. In his posts, he gave his live reactions to television news broadcasts, increased supporters, and attacked his perceived enemies.

“Twitter’s permanent suspension of Trump’s Twitter account is long overdue,” said Shannon McGregor, senior researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “This is the most important de-platform for Trump. The inability to tweet prevents his direct access to the press – and thus also to the public. “

In a statement late Friday, Mr Trump said Twitter tried to silence him. He said he was negotiating with other websites and promising a “big announcement soon” adding that he wanted to build “our own platform”.

“Twitter is not about FREE SPEECH,” Trump said. “It’s about promoting a radical left platform where some of the most evil people in the world can speak freely.”

The day before, Facebook had banned Mr. Trump for the remainder of his tenure, and other digital platforms – including Snapchat, YouTube, Twitch, and Reddit – recently restricted Mr. Trump to their services as well.

The actions were a strong example of the power of social media companies and how they could act almost unilaterally if they wanted to. Twitter, Facebook and other platforms had for years positioned themselves as defenders of free speech, saying that the posts of world leaders like Mr. Trump should be allowed because they were current. The companies had refused to touch his account even after being attacked for allowing misinformation and falsehoods.

Twitter decided to permanently suspend Mr Trump due to pressures from lawmakers, his own staff and many others, including Michelle Obama. Other world leaders and leaders have also posted brand tweets asking whether Twitter has come down a slippery slope and needed to close other accounts.

On Friday, the company also permanently suspended the accounts of several prominent Trump supporters who used the platform to spread conspiracy theories, including attorney Sidney Powell and former National Security Advisor to President Trump Michael T. Flynn. Rush Limbaugh, the Conservative talk show host, also appeared to have deactivated his account.

Donald Trump Jr., Mr. Trump’s son, described Twitter’s move against his father as “absolute madness” and said the tech companies were overwhelmed. “We live Orwell’s 1984,” he tweeted.

“Now is the time for Congress to repeal Section 230 and put Big Tech on the same legal footing as any other company in America,” said Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina on Friday.

Economy & Economy

Updated

Jan. 7, 2021, 12:58 p.m. ET

Mr Trump had repeatedly said to allies who had raised the possibility of social media companies banning him, “They will never ban me.”

There was an extensive process in place in the White House for creating official tweets. But at night and early in the morning, Mr. Trump composed his own tweets on his iPhone, often to the chagrin of advisers and Republican lawmakers who would spend hours or days studying the aftermath.

“I wouldn’t be here without the tweets,” Trump told the Financial Times in April 2017.

At a meeting at the White House last year, Brad Parscale, then Trump’s campaign manager, suggested that the president switch to Parler, an alternative social media site that has become popular with right-wing users. But Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, later turned down the idea, sharing Mr Trump’s trust that Twitter would not act, and it never happened, such a person who was briefed on what happened.

While the White House still has official Twitter accounts like @POTUS and @WhiteHouse until it opens, Twitter has announced that it will make it easier to transfer these accounts to the incoming Biden administration. Prior to Wednesday’s mob attack, Twitter’s executive director Jack Dorsey was involved in discussions about the transfer of these accounts, said a person familiar with the discussions.

The backlash against Mr. Trump online began Wednesday after his President-challenged loyalists breached the Capitol building. As a result, Twitter temporarily blocked Mr. Trump’s account, followed by Facebook. At the time, Twitter said the risk of having his comment live on its website had become too high.

The company said Mr Trump could return to his platform if he deleted multiple tweets containing falsehoods about the elections or calls for violence in violation of its guidelines. One of the tweets was a video Mr. Trump posted after police pushed the mob back where he told his followers, “We love you. You are something special. ”

After Mr Trump cut those posts, he was put back on the site Thursday. Late Thursday he issued a conciliatory message saying he was outraged by the violence and would allow a peaceful change of power.

But Mr. Trump tweeted on Friday that his supporters were “American patriots” with a “HUGE VOICE well into the future”. He also said he would not attend the inauguration on January 20.

Twitter said the news appeared to condone Wednesday’s violence and was likely to fuel further violence. It added that the one about the inauguration offered the date as a target.

“Plans for future armed protests have already spread on and off Twitter, including a planned secondary attack on the US Capitol and the state capitol building on January 17, 2021,” Twitter said.

Within Twitter, employees and executives have discussed how to treat Mr. Trump’s account. Mr Dorsey was vacationing on an island in French Polynesia this week but has been invited to meetings, said three people with knowledge of his location. On Thursday, he sent an email to employees saying it was important for Twitter to adhere to its policies, including the policy that a user can return after being temporarily banned, according to someone who received the email Has.

Hundreds of employees soon signed a petition urging the company to remove Mr Trump’s account immediately, said three people familiar with the petition. The petition was previously reported by the Washington Post.

On Friday, Twitter held a meeting with employees, two people with knowledge of the event said. During the meeting, workers urged executives why they hadn’t permanently banned Mr. Trump from the platform.

Mr Dorsey and other executives, like Vijaya Gadde, director of law and security at Twitter, said the company wants to be in line with its policies. These say that users can tweet again after deleting the messages that violate the rules.

But Mr Dorsey also said he “drew a line” in the sand that the president could not cross for fear of losing his account privileges, people with knowledge of the event said. Mr Dorsey said Twitter would issue a suspension if Mr Trump crossed that line.

Emerson Brooking, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, said the closure of Mr. Trump’s Twitter account was in some ways too late, given that the president had already been promoting so many conspiracy theories on the platform in recent years.

“Removing Trump from Twitter will not fix our policies, nor will it bring millions of Americans back to reality,” Brooking said. “But it makes it a lot harder for disinformation to go mainstream. And it makes it harder for Trump to reach his supporters. “

Aside from muting Mr. Trump’s largest megaphone, Twitter’s decision could be a headache for the Trump administration when it comes to complying with the Presidential Records Act of 1978, which requires the retention of materials and communications from the President.

Maggie Haberman, Katie Rosman and Maggie Astor contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Business

Twitter and Fb Lock Trump’s Accounts After Violence on Capitol Hill

On Twitter, on Wednesday, users asked the company’s CEO, Jack Dorsey, to close President Trump’s account. Civil rights groups said actions by social media companies against calls for political violence were “long overdue”. Even venture capitalists who had made wealth by investing in social media urged Twitter and Facebook to do more.

“For four years you have been rationalizing this terror. Inciting violent treason is not free speech, ”wrote Chris Sacca, a technology investor who invested in Twitter, to Mr. Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. “If you work in these companies, it’s up to you too. Shut it down.”

Twitter, Facebook and others had previously refused to crack down on Mr Trump’s posts and other toxic content, stating that the posts were in the public interest. While the platforms had taken more steps against political misinformation in the months leading up to the election, the platforms refused to remove Mr Trump’s messages and instead took half-measures, such as labeling his posts.

When violence broke out in Washington on Wednesday, longtime critics said it was the day the chickens came home to settle down for the social media companies. After the onslaught of criticism began, Twitter and Facebook removed several of Mr. Trump’s posts from their websites, including one in which the president falsely stated that “a holy landslide election victory” was “unceremoniously and viciously stripped.”

The transition of the president

Updated

Jan. 7, 2021, 3:41 p.m. ET

“We know the social media companies have been laconic at best,” said Jonathan Greenblatt, director of the Anti-Defamation League, to keep extremism from growing on their platforms. “Freedom of expression is not the freedom to incite violence. This is not a protected language. “

Renee DiResta, a researcher at Stanford Internet Observatory who studies online movements, added that the violence was the result of people engaging in closed social networks who believed the allegations of electoral fraud and election of Mr. Trump were stolen.

“This is a demonstration of the very real effects of echo chambers,” she said. “This was a remarkable rejection of the idea that there is an online and an offline world and that what is said online is in some way kept online. I hope this removes the notion from people’s minds. “

Categories
Politics

Trump’s Insurgency From Contained in the Oval Workplace

A group of 22 historians released a statement Monday noting that the 2020 elections weren’t even particularly close, historically. Mr Biden has won as many or more electoral college votes in five elections since 1960 as the winning candidates and more majority votes than in more than half of the presidential elections held in the past six decades.

“However, in none of these elections has a lost candidate attempted victory by brazenly sabotaging the electoral process, as Donald Trump did and continues to do,” said the letter, written by Rice University’s Douglas Brinkley and Sean Wilentz from Princeton University. Among those who signed was Michael W. McConnell of Stanford University, a former appeals court judge who effectively dismissed the efforts of one of its former employees, Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri.

Mr Trump’s allegiance to the concept of American democracy has long been debated. From the earliest days of his campaign for the White House, critics suggested that he harbored autocratic tendencies that raised questions about whether he would eventually undermine democracy or try to stay in power even if he lost, questions that loud enough that he felt compelled to react. “There is no one who is less fascist than Donald Trump,” he emphasized in 2016.

But Mr Trump did little to allay those fears in the years that followed. He admired strong men like Putin, Orban, President Xi Jinping of China and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey, and showed envy of their ability to act decisively without the control of a democratic government. He asserted at various points that the constitution “allows me to do whatever I want with the special adviser investigating him” and that his “authority” is total to order states to obey his wishes.

He tried to turn government agencies into instruments of political power and pressured the Justice Department to persecute his enemies and spare his friends. He made extensive use of the implementing ordinances sometimes decided by the courts and went too far. He was charged with abuse of power by the Democratic-controlled House in 2019 for pressuring Ukraine to help him tarnish Mr Biden’s reputation, despite being later acquitted by the Republican-run Senate.

When Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt published their bestselling book How Democracies Die in 2018, warning that even the United States could slip into autocracy, they were repulsed by some who thought they were overstating the case. “We have been criticized by some as alarming,” said Ziblatt, a government professor at Harvard University, on Monday. “It turned out we weren’t alarming enough.”

Mr Ziblatt said a healthy democracy requires at least two political parties that know how to compete and lose. “I hope and think we will get through the next few weeks,” he said, “but our democracy cannot survive in a recognizable way for long unless we have two parties that are committed to the rules and norms of democracy.”

Categories
Business

How Trump’s Push to Undo Election Has Divided His Media Allies

President Trump’s final term began Monday with the Republican Party’s disorder – and the president’s media allies also disagreed on how to deal with the crisis sparked by his fantasies of a “rigged” election.

On the Monday episode of Fox News’ normally Trump-friendly morning show “Fox & Friends,” host Brian Kilmeade urged Mr. Trump’s lawyers to produce evidence of fraud. He also warned that the pro-Trump protests scheduled for Washington this week are “the kind of anarchy that by and large works for no one, Republicans or Democrats.” His co-host Steve Doocy noted, “So far we haven’t seen the evidence.”

In the same program, Senator Marsha Blackburn, a Republican from Tennessee who has announced that she will object if Congress approves the vote on Wednesday’s electoral college, discussed the bomb record of a phone call made on Saturday that President Trump tried to get Brad Raffensperger to do. Georgia’s Secretary of State to defeat to change the state’s vote.

“Brian, one of the things I think everyone said is that that call wasn’t a helpful call,” Ms. Blackburn said. (On another Fox News broadcast, Republican strategist Karl Rove called Mr. Trump’s call “inappropriate”.)

Complicated matter for experts on the right: Acceptance of Mr. Trump’s allegations of a stolen election could stifle Republican turnout in Tuesday’s Georgia runoff election that will determine control of the United States Senate.

But Fox News has also expressed very different views of the President than those of Mr. Rove and the hosts of Fox & Friends. On Sunday night, right-wing brand Mark Levin told viewers of his prime time show on Fox News, “Our Declaration of Independence and Constitution are being destroyed by the Democratic Party and the media, and they want to destroy what’s left of it. ”

Throwing a warning to Republican leaders who are not involved in Mr. Trump’s efforts, Mr. Levin mentioned Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell by name and added, “The Republican leadership in the Senate has been extremely pathetic.”

Like the breakaway Republican senators who advocated Mr Trump’s efforts to undermine the election, Mr Levin has stayed in step with Mr Trump’s increasingly far-fetched fraud allegations.

At 9 p.m. on Fox News, Sean Hannity’s program presented viewers with numerous false statements about the 2020 election as it aired unfiltered Mr. Trump’s rally for the Georgia Republican Senate nominee. However, the prime-time venue provided by Mr Hannity was not enough for those in the audience who were aware of the reluctance of some Fox News personalities to support the President’s fraud claims. His mention of the network, almost an hour after his speech, drew the crowd.

Economy & Economy

Updated

Jan. 4, 2021, 3:39 p.m. ET

Monday’s comment on MSNBC and CNN was, unsurprisingly, slightly different.

John Heilemann, an MSNBC analyst, compared Mr. Trump to a mob boss. On CNN, host Jake Tapper described Mr Trump’s call to Georgian officials as “putting pressure on them, threatening them and suggesting that they could be prosecuted if they couldn’t find” enough votes “for Trump to get the election results in Georgia to change. ” . “He added,” Too many members of the ruling Republican Party are clearly trying to undermine the American experiment of undermining democracy. “

And when Fox News showed the Trump rally at 9 p.m., CNN host Chris Cuomo had a discussion on the slow roll-out of coronavirus vaccines.

Newsmax, the conservative network that has tried to outperform Fox News on the right by fueling Mr. Trump’s conspiracy theories, gave up time on Monday to several guests who vigorously supported the president’s unsubstantiated claims, including Representative Jody B. Hice Georgia and a Trump campaign advisor Steve Cortes.

Republican Mo Brooks, Republican of Alabama, told Newsmax viewers that there was “massive electoral fraud” and stated that President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. “would not be a legitimate president.” He also complained that the judicial system – which has been issuing opinion after opinion at the state and federal level against Mr. Trump’s fraud allegations – has been a “pathetic failure”. Bob Sellers, the Newsmax host who interviews Mr. Brooks, has not pushed his claims back.

Newsmax White House correspondent Emerald Robinson claimed Monday afternoon that Mr Trump did not try to get Mr Raffensperger to reverse the Georgia election results during the phone call, but instead used it as some sort of information tour.

“You can hear how passionately the president believes he has won the state,” said Ms. Robinson.

Even so, Newsmax does not protect viewers from the inevitability of Mr Biden’s inauguration, although many voters may object to the drafting. On a segment of the network, anchor John Bachman stated that Mr Biden’s plans for inauguration day would be reduced because of the pandemic; Right-wing commentator Dan O’Donnell, one of Mr. Bachman’s guests, wondered for no reason whether the minor inauguration was due to Mr. Biden’s “decreased mental capacity”.

“That’s a fair question,” said Mr. Bachman.

Categories
Politics

In Trump’s Last Chapter, a Failure to Rise to the Covid-19 Second

WASHINGTON — It was a warm summer Wednesday, Election Day was looming and President Trump was even angrier than usual at the relentless focus on the coronavirus pandemic.

“You’re killing me! This whole thing is! We’ve got all the damn cases,” Mr. Trump yelled at Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and senior adviser, during a gathering of top aides in the Oval Office on Aug. 19. “I want to do what Mexico does. They don’t give you a test till you get to the emergency room and you’re vomiting.”

Mexico’s record in fighting the virus was hardly one for the United States to emulate. But the president had long seen testing not as a vital way to track and contain the pandemic but as a mechanism for making him look bad by driving up the number of known cases.

And on that day he was especially furious after being informed by Dr. Francis S. Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, that it would be days before the government could give emergency approval to the use of convalescent plasma as a treatment, something Mr. Trump was eager to promote as a personal victory going into the Republican National Convention the following week.

“They’re Democrats! They’re against me!” he said, convinced that the government’s top doctors and scientists were conspiring to undermine him. “They want to wait!”

Throughout late summer and fall, in the heat of a re-election campaign that he would go on to lose, and in the face of mounting evidence of a surge in infections and deaths far worse than in the spring, Mr. Trump’s management of the crisis — unsteady, unscientific and colored by politics all year — was in effect reduced to a single question: What would it mean for him?

The result, according to interviews with more than two dozen current and former administration officials and others in contact with the White House, was a lose-lose situation. Mr. Trump not only ended up soundly defeated by Joseph R. Biden Jr., but missed his chance to show that he could rise to the moment in the final chapter of his presidency and meet the defining challenge of his tenure.

Efforts by his aides to persuade him to promote mask wearing, among the simplest and most effective ways to curb the spread of the disease, were derailed by his conviction that his political base would rebel against anything that would smack of limiting their personal freedom. Even his own campaign’s polling data to the contrary could not sway him.

His explicit demand for a vaccine by Election Day — a push that came to a head in a contentious Oval Office meeting with top health aides in late September — became a misguided substitute for warning the nation that failure to adhere to social distancing and other mitigation efforts would contribute to a slow-rolling disaster this winter.

His concern? That the man he called “Sleepy Joe” Biden, who was leading him in the polls, would get credit for a vaccine, not him.

The government’s public health experts were all but silenced by the arrival in August of Dr. Scott W. Atlas, the Stanford professor of neuroradiology recruited after appearances on Fox News.

With Dr. Deborah L. Birx, the coordinator of the White House virus task force, losing influence and often on the road, Dr. Atlas became the sole doctor Mr. Trump listened to. His theories, some of which scientists viewed as bordering on the crackpot, were exactly what the president wanted to hear: The virus is overblown, the number of deaths is exaggerated, testing is overrated, lockdowns do more harm than good.

As the gap between politics and science grew, the infighting that Mr. Trump had allowed to plague the administration’s response from the beginning only intensified. Threats of firings worsened the leadership vacuum as key figures undercut each other and distanced themselves from responsibility.

The administration had some positive stories to tell. Mr. Trump’s vaccine development program, Operation Warp Speed, had helped drive the pharmaceutical industry’s remarkably fast progress in developing several promising approaches. By the end of the year, two highly effective vaccines would be approved for emergency use, providing hope for 2021.

The White House rejected any suggestions that the president’s response had fallen short, saying he had worked to provide adequate testing, protective equipment and hospital capacity and that the vaccine development program had succeeded in record time.

“President Trump has led the largest mobilization of the public and private sectors since WWII to defeat Covid-19 and save lives,” said Brian Morgenstern, a White House spokesman.

But Mr. Trump’s unwillingness to put aside his political self-centeredness as Americans died by the thousands each day or to embrace the steps necessary to deal with the crisis remains confounding even to some administration officials. “Making masks a culture war issue was the dumbest thing imaginable,” one former senior adviser said.

His own bout with Covid-19 in early October left him extremely ill and dependent on care and drugs not available to most Americans, including a still-experimental monoclonal antibody treatment, and he saw firsthand how the disease coursed through the White House and some of his close allies.

Yet his instinct was to treat that experience not as a learning moment or an opportunity for empathy, but as a chance to portray himself as a Superman who had vanquished the disease. His own experience to the contrary, he assured a crowd at the White House just a week after his hospitalization, “It’s going to disappear; it is disappearing.”

Weeks after his own recovery, he would still complain about the nation’s preoccupation with the pandemic.

“All you hear is Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid,” Mr. Trump said at one campaign stop, uttering the word 11 times.

In the end he could not escape it.

By late July, new cases were at record highs, defying Mr. Trump’s predictions through the spring that the virus was under control, and deaths were spiking to alarming levels. Herman Cain, a 2012 Republican presidential candidate, died from the coronavirus; the previous month he had attended a Trump rally without a mask.

With the pandemic defining the campaign despite Mr. Trump’s efforts to make it about law and order, Tony Fabrizio, the president’s main pollster, came to the Oval Office for a meeting in the middle of the summer prepared to make a surprising case: that mask wearing was acceptable even among Mr. Trump’s supporters.

Arrayed in front of the Resolute Desk, Mr. Trump’s advisers listened as Mr. Fabrizio presented the numbers. According to his research, some of which was reported by The Washington Post, voters believed the pandemic was bad and getting worse, they were more concerned about getting sick than about the virus’s effects on their personal financial situation, the president’s approval rating on handling the pandemic had hit new lows and a little more than half the country did not think he was taking the situation seriously.

But what set off debate that day was Mr. Fabrizio’s finding that more than 70 percent of voters in the states being targeted by the campaign supported mandatory mask wearing in public, at least indoors, including a majority of Republicans.

Mr. Kushner, who along with Hope Hicks, another top adviser, had been trying for months to convince Mr. Trump that masks could be portrayed as the key to regaining freedom to go safely to a restaurant or a sporting event, called embracing mask-wearing a “no-brainer.”

Mr. Kushner had some reason for optimism. Mr. Trump had agreed to wear one not long before for a visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, after finding one he believed he looked good in: dark blue, with a presidential seal.

But Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff — backed up by other aides including Stephen Miller — said the politics for Mr. Trump would be devastating.

“The base will revolt,” Mr. Meadows said, adding that he was not sure Mr. Trump could legally make it happen in any case.

That was all Mr. Trump needed to hear. “I’m not doing a mask mandate,” he concluded.

Aside from when he was sick, he was rarely seen in a mask again.

The president had other opportunities to show leadership rather than put his political fortunes first.

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

With distribution of a coronavirus vaccine beginning in the U.S., here are answers to some questions you may be wondering about:

    • If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine? While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.
    • When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated? Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.
    • If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask? Yes, but not forever. Here’s why. The coronavirus vaccines are injected deep into the muscles and stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies. This appears to be enough protection to keep the vaccinated person from getting ill. But what’s not clear is whether it’s possible for the virus to bloom in the nose — and be sneezed or breathed out to infect others — even as antibodies elsewhere in the body have mobilized to prevent the vaccinated person from getting sick. The vaccine clinical trials were designed to determine whether vaccinated people are protected from illness — not to find out whether they could still spread the coronavirus. Based on studies of flu vaccine and even patients infected with Covid-19, researchers have reason to be hopeful that vaccinated people won’t spread the virus, but more research is needed. In the meantime, everyone — even vaccinated people — will need to think of themselves as possible silent spreaders and keep wearing a mask. Read more here.
    • Will it hurt? What are the side effects? The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection into your arm won’t feel different than any other vaccine, but the rate of short-lived side effects does appear higher than a flu shot. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. The side effects, which can resemble the symptoms of Covid-19, last about a day and appear more likely after the second dose. Early reports from vaccine trials suggest some people might need to take a day off from work because they feel lousy after receiving the second dose. In the Pfizer study, about half developed fatigue. Other side effects occurred in at least 25 to 33 percent of patients, sometimes more, including headaches, chills and muscle pain. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign that your own immune system is mounting a potent response to the vaccine that will provide long-lasting immunity.
    • Will mRNA vaccines change my genes? No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

After he recovered from his bout with the virus, some of his top aides, including Mr. Kushner and Jason Miller, a senior campaign strategist, thought the illness offered an opportunity to demonstrate the kind of compassion and resolve about the pandemic’s toll that Mr. Trump had so far failed to show.

When Mr. Trump returned from the hospital, his communications aides, with the help of Ivanka Trump, his daughter, urged him to deliver a national address in which he would say: “I had it. It was tough, it kicked my ass, but we’re going to get through it.”

He refused, choosing instead to address a boisterous campaign rally for himself from the balcony of the White House overlooking the South Lawn.

Mr. Trump never came around to the idea that he had a responsibility to be a role model, much less that his leadership role might require him to publicly acknowledge hard truths about the virus — or even to stop insisting that the issue was not a rampaging pandemic but too much testing.

Alex M. Azar II, the health and human services secretary, briefed the president this fall on a Japanese study documenting the effectiveness of face masks, telling him: “We have the proof. They work.” But the president resisted, criticizing Mr. Kushner for pushing them and again blaming too much testing — an area Mr. Kushner had been helping to oversee — for his problems.

“I’m going to lose,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Kushner during debate preparations. “And it’s going to be your fault, because of the testing.”

Mr. Morgenstern, the White House spokesman, said that exchange between the president and Mr. Kushner “never happened.”

Mr. Azar, who was sometimes one of the few people wearing a mask at White House events, privately bemoaned what he called a political, anti-mask culture set by Mr. Trump. At White House Christmas parties, Mr. Azar asked maskless guests to back away from him.

The decision to run the government’s response out of the West Wing was made in the early days of the pandemic. The idea was to break down barriers between disparate agencies, assemble public health expertise and encourage quick and coordinated decision-making.

It did not work out like that, and by fall the consequences were clear.

Mr. Trump had always tolerated if not encouraged clashes among subordinates, a tendency that in this case led only to policy paralysis, confusion about who was in charge and a lack of a clear, consistent message about how to reduce the risks from the pandemic.

Keeping decision-making power close to him was another Trump trait, but in this case it also elevated the myriad choices facing the administration to the presidential level, bogging the process down in infighting, raising the political stakes and encouraging aides to jockey for favor with Mr. Trump.

The result at times was a systemwide failure that extended well beyond the president.

“What we needed was a coordinated response that involved contributions from multiple agencies,” said Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who was commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration for the first two years of the Trump administration.

“Someone needed to pull that all together early,” he said. “It wasn’t the job of the White House, either. This needed to happen closer to the agencies. That didn’t happen on testing, or on a whole lot of other things.”

The relationship between Mr. Azar and Dr. Stephen M. Hahn, the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, grew increasingly tense; by early November, they were communicating only by text and in meetings.

Dr. Birx had lost the clout she enjoyed early on in the crisis and spent much of the summer and fall on the road counseling governors and state health officials.

Mr. Meadows was at odds with almost everyone as he sought to impose the president’s will on scientists and public health professionals. In conversations with top health officials, Mr. Meadows would rail against regulatory “bureaucrats” he thought were more interested in process than outcome.

Some of the doctors on the task force, including Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and Dr. Robert R. Redfield, were reluctant to show up in person at the White House, worried that the disdain there for mask wearing and social distancing would leave them at risk of infection.

Vice President Mike Pence was nominally in charge of the task force but was so cautious about getting crosswise with Mr. Trump as they battled for re-election that, in public at least, he became nearly invisible.

The debates inside the White House increasingly revolved around Dr. Atlas, who had no formal training in infectious diseases but whose views — which Mr. Trump saw him deliver on Fox News — appealed to the president’s belief that the crisis was overblown.

His arrival at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue was itself something of a mystery. Some aides said he was discovered by Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary. Others said John McEntee, the president’s personnel chief, had been Googling for a Trump-friendly doctor who would be loyal.

Marc Short, Mr. Pence’s chief of staff, opposed hiring Dr. Atlas. But once the president and his team brought him in, Mr. Short insisted that Dr. Atlas have a seat at the task force table, hoping to avoid having him become yet another internal — and destructive — critic.

Once inside, Dr. Atlas used the perch of a West Wing office to shape the response. During a meeting in early fall, Dr. Atlas asserted that college students were at no risk from the virus. We should let them go back to school, he said. It’s not a problem.

Dr. Birx exploded. What aspect of the fact that you can be asymptomatic and still spread it do you not understand? she demanded. You might not die, but you can give it to somebody who can die from it. She was livid.

“Your strategy is literally going to cost us lives,” she yelled at Dr. Atlas. She attacked Dr. Atlas’s ideas in daily emails she sent to senior officials. And she was mindful of a pact she had made with Dr. Hahn, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Redfield even before Dr. Atlas came on board: They would stick together if one of them was fired for doing what they considered the right thing.

Health officials often had a hard time finding an audience in the upper reaches of the West Wing. In a mid-November task force meeting, they issued a dire warning to Mr. Meadows about the looming surge in cases set to devastate the country. Mr. Meadows demanded data to back up their claim.

One outcome of the meeting was a Nov. 19 news conference on the virus’s dire threat, the first in many weeks. But while Mr. Pence, who led the briefing, often urged Americans to “do their part” to slow the spread of the virus, he never directly challenged Mr. Trump’s hesitancy on masks and social distancing. At the briefing, he said that “decision making at the local level” was key, continuing a long pattern of the administration seeking to push responsibility to the states.

Mr. Azar had been cut out of key decision-making as early as February, when Mr. Pence took over the task force. Mr. Azar would complain to his associates that Mr. Pence’s staff and task force members went around him to issue orders to his subordinates.

On tenterhooks about his job status, Mr. Azar found an opening that offered a kind of redemption, steering his attention through the summer and fall to Operation Warp Speed, the government’s effort to support rapid development of a vaccine, lavishing praise on Mr. Trump and crediting him for nearly every advance.

Behind the scenes, Mr. Azar portrayed Dr. Hahn to the White House as a flailing manager — a complaint he also voiced about Dr. Redfield. In late September, he told the White House he was willing to fire Dr. Hahn, according to officials familiar with the offer.

For their part, Dr. Hahn, Dr. Redfield, Dr. Birx and other senior health officials saw Mr. Azar as crushing the morale of the agencies he oversaw as he sought to escape blame for a worsening crisis and to strengthen his own image publicly and with the White House.

Health officials on the task force several times took their complaints about Mr. Azar to Mr. Pence’s office, hoping for an intervention.

Caitlin B. Oakley, a spokeswoman for Mr. Azar, said he had “always stood up for balanced, scientific, public health information and insisted that science and data drive the decisions.”

Once eager to visit the White House, Dr. Hahn became disillusioned with what he saw as its efforts to politicize the work of the Food and Drug Administration, and he eventually shied away from task force meetings, fearing his statements there would leak.

If there was a bureaucratic winner in this West Wing cage match, it was Dr. Atlas.

He told Mr. Trump that the right way to think about the virus was how much “excess mortality” there was above what would have been expected without a pandemic.

Mr. Trump seized on the idea, often telling aides that the real number of dead was no more than 10,000 people.

As of Thursday, 342,577 Americans had died from the pandemic.

In an Oval Office meeting with senior health officials on Sept. 24, the president made explicit what he had long implied: He wanted a vaccine before the election, according to three people who witnessed his demand.

Pfizer’s chief executive had been encouraging the belief that the company could deliver initial results by late October. But Mr. Trump’s aides tried in vain to make clear that they could not completely control the timing.

Dr. Fauci and Dr. Hahn reminded West Wing officials that a company’s vaccine trial results were a “black box,” impossible to see until an independent monitoring board revealed them. A vaccine that did not go through the usual, rigorous government approval process would be a “Pyrrhic victory,” Mr. Azar told them. It would be a shot no one would take.

Dr. Moncef Slaoui, the scientific leader of Operation Warp Speed, said the president never asked him to deliver a vaccine on a specific timetable. But he said Mr. Trump sometimes complained in meetings that “it was not going to happen before the election and it will be ‘Sleepy Joe’” who would ultimately get credit.

In late October, science and regulations worked against Mr. Trump’s waning hopes for pre-Election Day good news. At the F.D.A., scientists had refined the standards for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use. And at Pfizer, executives realized that the agency was unlikely to authorize its vaccine on the basis of so few Covid-19 cases among its clinical trial volunteers.

They decided to wait for more data, a delay of up to a week.

When Pfizer announced on Nov. 9 — two days after Mr. Biden clinched his victory — that its vaccine was a stunning success, Mr. Trump was furious. He lashed out at the company, Dr. Hahn and the F.D.A., accusing “deep state regulators” of conspiring with Pfizer to slow approval until after the election.

The president’s frustration with the pace of regulatory action would continue into December, as the F.D.A. went through a time-consuming process of evaluating Pfizer’s data and then that of a second vaccine maker, Moderna.

On Dec. 11, Mr. Meadows exploded during a morning call with Dr. Hahn and Dr. Peter Marks, the agency’s top vaccine regulator. He accused Dr. Hahn of mismanagement and suggested he resign, then slammed down the phone. That night, the F.D.A. authorized the Pfizer vaccine.

In the weeks that followed, Mr. Pence, Mr. Azar, Dr. Fauci and other health officials rolled up their sleeves to be vaccinated for the cameras.

Mr. Trump, who after contracting Covid-19 had declared himself immune, has not announced plans to be vaccinated.

Michael D. Shear, Noah Weiland, Sharon LaFraniere and Mark Mazzetti reported from Washington, and Maggie Haberman from New York. Katie Thomas contributed reporting from Chicago.

Categories
Health

Joe Biden says Trump’s Covid vaccine effort far brief its personal objectives

U.S. President-elect Joe Biden speaks to reporters after making remarks at The Queen in Wilmington, Delaware ahead of the December 22nd, 2020 holiday.

Alex Edelman | AFP | Getty Images

President-elect Joe Biden on Tuesday criticized the Trump administration’s efforts to distribute and administer Covid vaccine shots, saying the administration had failed to achieve its own goals.

“The Trump administration’s plan to distribute vaccines is falling far behind,” he said at a press conference. “As I have long feared and warned, efforts to distribute and administer the vaccine are not progressing as they should.”

He said his government will “move heaven and earth” to expedite the distribution and delivery of the Covid vaccines once he takes office on Jan. 20. He reiterated his government’s pledge to have administered 100 million doses of vaccine by his 100th day in office.

“This will be the greatest operational challenge we have ever faced as a nation,” he added. “We’ll get there. It’s going to take a tremendous new effort. It’s not underway yet.”

While more than 11.4 million doses of vaccine had been distributed to states on Monday, just over 2.1 million doses were given, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The agency notes that when states and jurisdictions report the data, their data may lag behind the actual number of doses given.

“A large difference between the number of doses distributed and the number of doses administered is expected at this point in the COVID vaccination program due to several factors including delays in reporting doses administered, managing available vaccine stocks by jurisdiction, and imminent vaccination launch the federal program for pharmacy partnership for long-term care, “says the agency on its vaccine tracking website.

CDC officials did not respond to CNBC’s request for further comment on the inequality between administered and administered doses.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases, admitted Tuesday on CNN that the vaccine roll-out has been slower than expected.

“We are certainly not at the numbers we wanted at the end of December,” he said in an interview with Jim Sciutto. “I think we will see an increase in momentum in January that will hopefully allow us to catch up on the planned pace Jim.”

Michael Pratt, a spokesman for Operation Warp Speed, reiterated that the number of doses reported by the CDC is likely to be too few due to delays in reporting data.

“Operation Warp Speed ​​remains on track to deliver approximately 40 million vaccine doses and 20 million primary vaccination doses by the end of December 2020. The distribution of the 20 million primary doses extends into the first week of January when states place orders she, “he said in a statement.

Dr. Atul Gawande, a member of Biden’s Covid-19 advisory team, said on CBS This Morning Tuesday that the in-depth administration “does not have all the information it needs to understand where the bottlenecks are”.

He also noted that he is concerned that the Trump administration is overly optimistic about the vaccination schedule. Trump’s HHS Secretary Alex Azar has said the general public can be vaccinated by March.

“I worry that if things get back to normal, I’ll be over-promising,” said Gawande, a surgeon at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston and a professor at Harvard University.

He vowed that the Biden administration would be more transparent about where the problems lie, be it with the production, the distribution or the administration of the recordings.