Categories
Politics

Biden Takes Middle Stage With Bold Agenda as Trump’s Trial Ends

WASHINGTON – President Biden’s allies say that after the impeachment process of his predecessor is distracted, he will be quick to press for the passage of his $ 1.9 trillion coronavirus relief plan before moving on to an even bigger agenda in Congress that is Infrastructure, immigration and crime includes judicial reform, climate change and health care.

Mr Biden has so far been able to move his agenda forward amid the whirlwind of impeachment, trial and acquittal of former President Donald J. Trump. House committees are already debating parts of the coronavirus relief laws he calls the American Rescue Plan. Despite the Trump drama, several president’s cabinet members were confirmed. And Mr Biden’s team urges lawmakers to act swiftly when the senators return from a week-long hiatus.

Without the spectacle of constitutional conflict, the new president “is now center stage in a way the first few weeks did not allow,” said Jennifer Palmieri, who served as communications director for President Barack Obama. She said the end of the process means “2021 can finally begin”.

In a post-trial statement, Mr. Biden reiterated his hopes for bipartisan support and pledged to work bipartisan to “heal the soul of the nation.” However, Mr Biden’s outlook is compounded by the fact that much of his agenda is aimed at dismantling Mr Trump’s policies or addressing what Democrats have viewed as his failure, especially the fiddled response to the pandemic.

And the 43 “not guilty” Senate Republican votes on Saturday have greatly eased both political opportunities and challenges for Mr Biden: a small minority of Republican senators willing to brave the wrath of Mr Trump’s powerful political movement by voting condemn him while Mr Trump continues to rule most of his party.

The reality is that Mr Trump’s influence over Republicans will be an obstacle to Mr Biden’s priorities even if the former President leaves Washington. Even with control of both Houses of Congress, the Democrats will still need Republican support on many of Mr Biden’s agenda items to overcome a filibuster in the Senate.

“Trump will certainly continue to be a force in the Republican Party. They have to decide whether or not they are trapped, ”said Winnie Stachelberg, executive vice president at the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank. “President Biden is focused on the welfare of the American people. He will not be derailed and distracted from this main mission, whatever the sideshow former President Trump does. “

In the past few days, senior members of Mr Biden’s team have started internal meetings at the White House to discuss what the next phase of his agenda will be and how it will be implemented, according to two senior White House advisers. Some of this could be publicly announced in March, if Mr Biden is expected to deliver a joint address to Congress, as is the custom in the first year of a president’s office.

Administration officials acknowledge that Mr Biden will now receive more public attention, a reality they plan to capitalize on with the President’s first substantive trip outside Washington earlier this week. Mr Biden will attend a CNN town hall-style event in Milwaukee on Tuesday and travel to another part of the country on Thursday.

“For understandable reasons, it will be more of a spotlight than it was last week,” said Jen Psaki, White House press secretary. “Now there may be a focus on the president’s agenda again, getting relief into the hands of the American people.”

Public polls show that the president’s agenda is widespread even among some Republicans. This has added pressure from Democratic progressives to refrain from compromising with Republicans that could water down Mr Biden’s political proposals. And the Republicans, still bracing for the loss of the Senate and White House, have not yet banded together in a rigorous substantive assault on the president’s agenda.

“He might be able to get more country on his side when it comes to supporting the agenda as there is no cohesive Republican argument,” said Ms Palmieri of Mr Biden.

Given the razor-thin margins in Congress, the president’s hopes for a swift implementation of an ambitious agenda are more likely if he can at least count on the support of Republicans. And Mr Trump’s influence on the party threatens the prospect of cross-party cooperation.

For the first 24 days of Mr Biden’s presidency, Mr Trump had a constant presence – not on the Twitter account he is banned from using, but as an impeachment target to spark a riot to prevent his own fall. Reporters encamped in Palm Beach, Florida as wall-to-wall cable networks covered the Senate trial that would determine its fate.

Mr Biden tried to distance himself from the debate over whether Mr Trump should be held accountable for the January 6 uprising in the Capitol for fear it would lose momentum on his agenda.

Even when the process is over, Mr Trump seems unwilling to lose sight of the nation’s psyche. Former President aides say Mr Trump plans to hold a press conference from Mar-a-Lago, his home in Florida, in the coming days. In a statement immediately after the trial ended, Trump, who has expressed an interest in running for president again in 2024, indicated that he had no plans to disappear from television screens or from the political life of Republicans in Congress.

“Our historic, patriotic and beautiful movement to make America great again has only just begun,” wrote the former president. “I have a lot to share with you in the months ahead, and I look forward to continuing our incredible journey together to achieve American greatness for all of our people. There has never been anything like it! “

Ms Psaki said the president, who steadfastly refused to comment on the ongoing impeachment process, is not focusing on Mr Trump. She said that mentions of his comments or activities were very rare in private conversations between the president and his aides.

“The political campaign is over,” she said. “He hit Donald Trump. He and we don’t want to get involved in this fight again. “

Presidents often refer to their predecessors long after leaving the world’s largest bullying pulpit.

When Mr. Obama took office in 2009, he vowed to end his predecessor George W. Bush’s “cowboy diplomacy” and blamed him for the country’s economic problems. In 2017, Mr Trump repeatedly downgraded Mr Obama’s performance to encourage the change he felt was necessary.

But perhaps more than any other past president, Mr Biden has used Mr Trump as an effective political slide, constructing his agenda almost entirely as a rejection of Mr Trump’s politics and personal conduct during his turbulent four years in office.

Mr Biden’s first actions on Day 1 were a flash of executive orders designed to undo many of Mr Trump’s policies in a single day. And he often sees his broader agenda as the necessary response to actions his predecessor took or not taken. Late last week, he said again that Mr Trump’s administration had failed to provide the government with tools to fight the coronavirus pandemic.

“What we thought was available, from vaccine to vaccine, was not the case,” Biden told a non-partisan group of mayors and governors.

Joe Lockhart, who served as press secretary for President Bill Clinton, said the most important thing Mr Biden can do to advance his broad agenda is successfully fighting the pandemic and working to repair the troubled economy.

“Where he will gain political capital is to compare his handling of the pandemic to the disastrous efforts of the Trump administration,” Lockhart said. The end of impeachment, he said, “paves the way for people to focus on it.”

The question for Mr Biden is whether he can use the political space to build support for his proposals. And if he can, will public pressure be enough to convince Republicans in Congress to oppose Mr. Trump’s influence?

Senator Chris Coons, Democrat of Delaware and a close ally of the president, said Mr Biden would continue to push for bipartisan collaboration on coronavirus relief law and other priorities. But he said he was confident the president would not be put off by the Republican opposition.

“He’s making strides in the relief backed by three-quarters of the American people,” Coons said on ABC’s This Week on Sunday. “And from the way he spoke when he was inaugurated, to the actions he took in the first few weeks, he shows us what real presidential leadership looks like in sharp contrast to his predecessor.”

Categories
World News

Donald Trump acquitted by Senate in second impeachment trial

US President Donald Trump gestures during a rally to contest the certification of the results of the 2020 US presidential election by the US Congress on January 6, 2021 in Washington, USA.

Jim Bourg | Reuters

The Senate on Saturday acquitted former President Donald Trump in a 57-43 vote on charges of instigating rioting for his role in the Jan. 6 riot in the U.S. Capitol, which killed 5 people, including a police officer.

Seven GOP senators voted guilty in the most bipartisan majority in support of an impeachment conviction in US history. It took Democrats 17 Republicans to join Trump and hold a separate vote to keep him from running for office in the future.

The decision came after the House impeachment managers reversed course and dropped a call for testimony that would have delayed the verdict. The acquittal marks the end of a five-day impeachment trial.

Republicans who voted guilty included Sens. Richard Burr from North Carolina, Bill Cassidy from Louisiana, Susan Collins from Maine, Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, Mitt Romney from Utah, Ben Sasse from Nebraska, and Pat Toomey from Pennsylvania. Toomey and Burr are not running for re-election in Congress.

Nine House Democrats acted as impeachment managers in the process, arguing that Trump had direct responsibility for the riots and was bringing new video and audio evidence to the US Capitol during the attack.

Trump’s defense team denied that the former president instigated the attack, arguing that Trump’s rhetoric was protected by the first change. His lawyers also argued that the process was unconstitutional as Trump was a private individual and no longer president.

No president before Trump has ever been tried and tried twice, and a former president has never been tried in the Senate.

In Trump’s first impeachment trial, the Senate acquitted Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress because Trump had pressured Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden and his son. Romney was the only GOP Senator found guilty in the trial.

Trump described the process in a statement following his acquittal on Saturday as “another phase in the greatest witch hunt” in US history.

“Our historic, patriotic and beautiful movement to make America great again has only just begun,” Trump said. “I have a lot to share with you in the months ahead and I look forward to continuing our incredible journey together to achieve American greatness for all of our people.”

Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer, in a speech in the Senate, classified the acquittal as “un-American” and said the January 6 riots would be Trump’s “last terrible legacy”.

“Let it live on in shame, a stain on Donald John Trump that can never, never be washed away,” said Schumer. “There was only one correct judgment in this process: guilty.”

Chief impeachment manager, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., Said in his closing arguments that the house managers presented “overwhelming and irrefutable” evidence that Trump orchestrated and instigated the attack on the Capitol.

Raskin compared Trump’s actions to those of an arsonist who started a fire, kept pouring fuel on it, and stood ready to see it burn “happily”. In a separate argument, he got more personal, asking the senators if this was the kind of land they wanted future generations to give.

“This process is ultimately not about Donald Trump. The country and the world know who Donald Trump is,” said Raskin. “This process is about who we are.”

“And if we as a people cannot deal with it together, we all forget the boundaries of party, ideology and geography and all these things. If we cannot deal with it, how will we ever conquer the other?” Crises of our time? “Raskin continued.” Is that America? Do we want to leave this to our children and grandchildren?

Trump’s attorney Michael van der Veen said in his concluding argument that the Democrats had committed a tremendous violation of Trump’s constitutional rights by punishing him for a protected speech on the First Amendment. He described this as an attempt to “censor unfavorable political speeches and discriminate against those who were disapproved of” stance. “

“It is an unprecedented action with the potential to cause serious and lasting damage to both the presidency and the separation of powers and the future of democratic self-government,” said Van der Veen.

Democratic impeachment manager Rep. David Cicilline, DR.I., made his closing argument by going through the timeline of Trump’s actions on the day of the riot and rejecting the defense team’s claim that Trump did not know his Vice President Mike Pence. was in danger.

“It developed on live television in front of the whole world. Do you believe that no one, not a single person, informed the President that his Vice-President had been evacuated? Or that the President did not look at the television Has.” ? Or his Twitter account? “Said Cicilline.

“He cheated on us on purpose. He broke his oath,” added Cicilline.

Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-Pa., Rejected arguments from Trump’s defense team, saying that Trump had convinced his supporters to believe his “big lie” that the 2020 election was stolen and that they had to go out to fight it.

“It is not true that you did this of your own accord and for your own reasons,” said Dean. “The evidence shows the exact opposite, that for Donald Trump they did this at his invitation, at his direction, at his command.”

The Senate had voted to allow witnesses 55 to 45 ahead, with five Republicans joining all Democrats. The GOP Senators were Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Collins, Murkowski, Romney and Sasse.

However, the board agreed to terminate the trial shortly afterwards after including a statement from Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Wash., As evidence on the record. Earlier in the day, Raskin called for Beutler’s removal after confirming the contents of an explosive phone conversation between the House GOP leader Kevin McCarthy and Trump as the attack on the Capitol unfolded.

On the call, Trump appeared to be on the side of the rioters. Beutler’s testimony stated that Trump said to McCarthy, “Well, Kevin, I think these people are more upset about the election than you are.”

Van der Veen responded to Raskin by saying, “We should close this case today,” saying the call for witnesses showed that the House had not properly investigated the riot.

It is unclear whether calling witnesses could have changed the votes of GOP senators who have already made their decisions.

For example, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell told his Republican counterparts earlier in the day that he intended not to vote guilty, arguing the chamber had no power to convict a former president.

The House indicted Trump when he was still president and McConnell declined to start the process before Biden’s inauguration because there wasn’t enough time. After the acquittal, McConnell criticized Trump for a “shameful breach of duty”.

“There is no question that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day,” McConnell said. “No question.”

Categories
Politics

The 7 Republicans who voted to convict Trump in second impeachment trial

Senator Pat Toomey, R-Pa., Attends a campaign event at Herbert W. Best VFW Post 928 in Folsom, Pa., Sept. 23, 2016. John McCain, R-Ariz., Is also attending in support of Toomey.

Tom Williams | CQ appeal | Getty Images

WASHINGTON – Seven Republican senators and all of the Democrats found former President Donald Trump guilty on Saturday for instigating the U.S. Capitol insurrection, despite the bipartisan vote that was insufficient to achieve the two-thirds majority required for conviction.

In Trump’s second impeachment trial, Republican Sens. Richard Burr from North Carolina, Bill Cassidy from Louisiana, Susan Collins from Maine, Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, Mitt Romney from Utah, Ben Sasse from Nebraska and Pat Toomey from Pennsylvania voted for the 45th sentence. President.

The seven GOP senators joined 48 Democrats and two independent senators.

The Senate acquitted Trump in a 57-43 vote on charges of instigating riots for his role in the deadly January 6th Capitol riot. It took Democrats 17 Republicans to join Trump.

The decision came after the House impeachment managers reversed course and dropped a call for testimony that would have delayed the verdict. The acquittal marks the end of a five-day impeachment trial.

Trump is the first president to be tried and tried twice.

Senator Mitt Romney, R-Utah speaks to a group of bipartisan lawmakers during a press conference to unveil a COVID-19 emergency relief framework at the Dirksen Senate office building in Washington on Tuesday, December 1, 2020.

Caroline Brehman | CQ Appeal, Inc. | Getty Images

During Trump’s first impeachment trial, Romney was the only Republican to quit his party and convict the president. The Senate acquitted Trump in 2020 on impeachment proceedings resulting from his efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate then-Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.

Senator Lisa Murkowski, who can be re-elected in 2022, had previously called for Trump to resign after the Capitol uprising. Senator Pat Toomey had also called for the president to resign. He has stated that he will not run for re-election if his seat expires in 2022.

Senator Ben Sasse said last month he was open to considering impeachment proceedings against the former Republican president.

Senator Burr, who has announced that he will not seek re-election, had previously voted to oppose impeachment on constitutional grounds. Burr’s term ends in 2022.

Senator Cassidy originally said he would dismiss the case on the grounds that it was unconstitutional, but then changed his voice last week, saying Trump’s lawyers had done a “terrible” job clarifying the matter.

Senator Lisa Murkowski, R-AK, speaks during a Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions nominations hearing for Marty Walsh to be the Secretary of Labor on February 4, 2021 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.

Graeme Jennings | Pool | Reuters

Trump’s defense team denied the former president instigated the attack, arguing that the former president’s rhetoric was protected by the first change. His lawyers also called the trial unconstitutional as Trump was no longer president.

“The Democrats were obsessed with indicting Mr. Trump from the start,” said Trump’s attorney Michael van der Veen in concluding arguments.

“In short, this impeachment was a complete charade from start to finish. The whole spectacle was nothing more than the opposition party’s unreserved pursuit of longstanding political vengeance against Mr. Trump,” he added.

Senior impeachment manager, Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, urged Senators to review in his closing remarks what he called “overwhelming,” “irrefutable,” and “not refuted.”

“This process is ultimately not about Donald Trump. The country and the world know who Donald Trump is. This process is about who we are,” said Raskin.

Categories
Politics

McConnell will vote to acquit Trump as impeachment trial nears finish

Senate Republican minority leader Mitch McConnell arrives at the U.S. Capitol on February 5 of the second impeachment trial of former U.S. President Donald Trump on February 13, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Almond Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

Mitch McConnell, chairman of the Senate minority, emailed his Republican counterparts on Saturday that he would release Donald Trump in the former president’s second impeachment.

“During a close conversation, I am convinced that impeachments are primarily an instrument of elimination and therefore we have no jurisdiction,” wrote McConnell. The Kentucky Senator also stated that criminal misconduct by a president during his tenure after he has left office can be prosecuted.

McConnell had refused to initiate impeachment proceedings before President Joe Biden was inaugurated, stating that there was insufficient time. McConnell said in his email that he still regards the verdict as a “vote of conscience”.

The final vote on Trump’s conviction was due to take place on Saturday afternoon, less than a week after the trial began and a month after the House indicted Trump on an article inciting the January 6 riot in the U.S. Capitol.

Senators initially voted 55-45 on Saturday morning to call witnesses to the trial, an unexpected development that would likely have delayed the verdict. The Senate then reversed course and will now move forward to end the trial without a witness.

Democrats need two-thirds of the Senate to vote for a conviction, which means that at least 17 Republicans would have to vote with all Democrats and Independents to convict Trump. Only six out of 50 Republican senators believed the trial should take place at all.

In this screenshot from a webcast by congress.gov, a roll-call vote is being held on a motion to summon witnesses on the fifth day of former President Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial at the U.S. Capitol on February 13, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Congress.gov | Getty Images

All Democratic Senators voted to hear witnesses along with five Republicans: Susan Collins from Maine, Lindsey Graham from South Carolina, Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, Mitt Romney from Utah, and Ben Sasse from Nebraska.

The call for testimony came after further details of an explosive dispute between House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy and Trump emerged on a phone call Friday night as the Capitol uprising unfolded in which Trump appears to be on the side of the United States Rioters stood and said they were more “angry” with the election results than McCarthy.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, DR.I. suggested that the process be halted to remove McCarthy and Senator Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala. Senator Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., Supported Whitehouse’s call in a tweet on Saturday morning. Senator Mitt Romney, R-Utah, said he would also endorse witnesses if both sides ask.

“One way to clear it up? Suspend the process to oath McCarthy and Tuberville and get facts,” Whitehouse wrote in a tweet. “Ask intelligence to submit communications to the White House for review regarding VP Pence’s safety during the siege. What did Trump know and when did he know?”

In this screenshot from a webcast from congress.gov, Senior House Impeachment Head Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) speaks on the fifth day of former President Donald Trump’s second impeachment trial at the U.S. Capitol on February 13, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Congress.gov | Getty Images

During the trial, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., The chief impeachment manager called to subpoena Rep. Herrera Beutler, R-WA, to inform her of her testimony regarding her communication with McCarthy.

Trump attorney Michael van der Veen responded by saying “We should close this case today” and that the call for witnesses shows that the House has not properly investigated the riots.

Bruce Castor, one of Trump’s defense lawyers, said Saturday he would call “many” witnesses. The Senate is still working on the next steps, as dismissing witnesses can take days or even weeks.

The process was unprecedented in many ways. No president before Trump has ever been tried and tried twice, and a former president has never been tried in the Senate. If the process closes as expected this weekend, it will be the shortest impeachment process ever recorded.

It is also noteworthy that the senators serving as the jury in the trial are themselves witnesses to the events that, according to prosecutors, instigated Trump.

Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-WA) questions Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta as he testifies during a House Appropriations Committee hearing on the fiscal year 2020 working budget on April 3, 2019 on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC.

Al Drago | Getty Images

The break-in at the Capitol forced a joint session of Congress to vacate their chambers, ruining the process of confirming President Joe Biden’s electoral college victory. Five people, including a US Capitol police officer, died as a result of the attack.

Before the siege began, Trump held a rally in front of the White House calling on a crowd of his supporters to march to the Capitol to protest the election results and to pressure Republicans, including then Vice President Mike Pence, for them To question results.

“If you don’t fight like hell, you will have no more land,” Trump said at the rally, one of many statements before, during and after the uprising that the Democrats took as evidence of incitement.

Nine House Democrats selected as impeachment managers in the process argued that Trump has direct responsibility for the invasion. Led by Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., The executives presented within two days that Trump should be convicted and disqualified for ever holding federal office again.

Trump laid the groundwork for the attack over the months by relentlessly spreading the “big lie” that the 2020 elections were stolen by widespread electoral fraud. Managers said Trump set his “Stop the Steal” rally on Jan. 6 as the final stand to reverse the election result, then whipped his supporters and directed them to the Capitol.

“He had gathered thousands of violent people, people he knew to be violent, people he had considered violent,” property manager Madeleine Dean said at the trial. “And then he pointed to us, lit the fuse and sent an angry mob to fight the supposed enemy – his own Vice President and members of Congress – when we confirmed an election.”

Their presentation contained never-before-seen video and audio evidence, including security footage in the Capitol that showed lawmakers running to safety from the mob.

Trump’s lawyers denied that the former president had instigated the attack and placed particular emphasis on his use of the words “peaceful and patriotic” during his speech at the pre-insurrection rally. Trump’s rhetoric, they said, was a fully protected speech under the First Amendment and no worse than what Democrats have said in the past.

The urge to expel Trump from the future office amounts to a “culture of constitutional repeal,” said defense attorney Michael van der Veen.

The defense team also had problems with the legal process. They argued that the impeachment process itself was unconstitutional as Trump was a private citizen and no longer a president. They also said the process was rushed and Trump was deprived of procedural rights.

Van der Veen warned that the process would transform the impeachment power of Congress into a “mechanism for enforcing state control over which individuals can and cannot become president”.

They started their presentation on Friday noon; They finished less than three hours later, although they had up to 16 hours to represent their case.

Trump’s legal roster was released less than two weeks before the first day of the trial when the Senate met to review and vote on whether it had jurisdiction over the former president.

Castor received scathing reviews from Democrats and Republicans for making a tortuous, tangential argument. Senator Bill Cassidy, a Republican who had previously voted to dismiss the trial on constitutional grounds, voted with the Democrats after listening to Trump’s lawyers.

In Trump’s first impeachment trial, only one GOP senator, Mitt Romney of Utah, voted to condemn Trump.

That process, in which the Senate examined articles on abuse of power and obstruction of Congress in connection with Trump’s pressure on Ukraine to investigate Biden and his son, took nearly three weeks – allegedly the shortest in US history.

If Trump’s second trial ends on Saturday, it will have lasted five days.

Categories
Business

How Media Differs in Protection of Trump Impeachment Trial

On MSNBC, whose prime-time hosts are always critical of Mr. Trump, presenter Chris Hayes on Wednesday praised the prosecution’s use of “really stunning video”. He said it “masterfully” “linked Trump’s words and actions to the violence shattering the seat of American democracy.”

When the property managers presented their case Thursday afternoon, David Schoen, one of Mr. Trump’s attorneys, appeared on Fox News’ America Reports With John Roberts & Sandra Smith. He criticized the presentation as an “entertainment package” and described it as “offensive”.

Chris Wallace, the Fox News Sunday anchor, said on Wednesday as a guest on Martha MacCallum’s Fox News show that the property managers were doing “a very effective job”. The next day on Ms. MacCallum’s show, Hogan Gidley, a former White House deputy press secretary, urged Democrats’ efforts to equate a refusal to condemn Mr. Trump with support for the Jan. 6 rioters – “a filthy political one Trick and dangerous for the future of our country. “

Multiple guests on Fox News blew up the Democrats’ efforts to win a conviction. “Most Republicans found the property managers’ presentation offensive and absurd,” South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said on Mr. Hannity’s show on Wednesday.

In his monologue Thursday night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson said he couldn’t understand why Democrats were “so angry” after President Biden won the election. “They are crazy, flowery, irrational, scream and threaten,” he said. “It’s bizarre.”

Across the cable separation, there was a point of agreement: the hosts take on the defense lawyers. Mr Hannity described the legal team’s performance on Tuesday as “a little meandering” before his Fox News colleague Laura Ingraham described it as “terrible”.

On Wednesday, MSNBC’s Ms. Maddow said an attorney for Mr. Trump’s Bruce L. Castor Jr. had delivered an “Art Bart Simpson meets Foghorn Leghorn routine”. On Thursday, she apologized for pointing out cartoon characters, saying it was “inappropriate” only to reiterate that his Senate performance was “disastrous”.

A guest at Newsmax, Brian Darling, a former attorney for Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, presented a testimony of the opening address of both sides. The property managers received a C-Plus. The Trump team received a D.

Categories
Politics

Takeaways From Day three of Trump’s Impeachment Trial

House impeachment executives on Thursday closed their case against former President Donald J. Trump, warning Senators that it would set a dangerous standard for the country in the future if they didn’t vote for a conviction. The trial will resume Friday when Mr Trump’s defense team comes up with their case that the president did not instigate the attack on the Capitol.

Here are some takeaways from the third day of the trial.

The impeachment managers used their last day of the argument to convince the Senators that Mr Trump invited the rioters to Washington on Jan. 6. They argued that the “insurgents” who attacked the Capitol were not acting alone as its defenders said and will most likely claim if they present their case.

The managers again used video footage of Mr. Trump and his supporters to present their arguments, interspersed with clips of chaos to remind the Senators of how they felt when the Capitol was attacked. They claimed that such violence would not have happened without Mr Trump.

An impeachment manager, Representative Diana DeGette of Colorado, shared her experience during the attack and how she and others ran to safety and saw a SWAT team with weapons aimed at rioters on the ground. Ms. DeGette said she wondered, “Who sent you there?”

She shared comments from rioters, including a Texas real estate agent named Jennifer L. Ryan. “I thought I was going to follow my president,” Ms. Ryan said. “I thought I was following what we were called to do. He asked us to fly there, he asked us to be there, so I did what he asked us to do. “

The Trump impeachment ›

What you need to know

    • A court case will determine whether former President Donald J. Trump is guilty of instigating a deadly crowd of his supporters when they stormed the Capitol on January 6, violently violated security measures, and went into hiding when they met to certify President Biden’s victory.
    • Parliament voted 232 votes to 197 in favor of a single impeachment trial, accusing Mr. Trump of “inciting violence against the United States government” in order to dismiss the election results. Ten Republicans voted against him alongside the Democrats.
    • To convict Mr. Trump, the Senate would need a two-thirds majority to approve. This means that at least 17 Republican senators would have to vote with Senate Democrats to convict.
    • A conviction seems unlikely. Last month, only five Senate Republicans sided with the Democrats in repelling a Republican attempt to dismiss the charges because Mr Trump is no longer in office. Only 27 senators say they are not sure whether to convict Mr. Trump.
    • If the Senate convicts Mr. Trump and finds him guilty of “inciting violence against the United States government,” the Senators could vote on whether to expel him from office. This vote would only require a simple majority, and when it came to party lines, the Democrats would prevail if Vice President Kamala Harris casts the casting vote.
    • If the Senate doesn’t condemn Mr Trump, the former president could run for office again. Public opinion polls show he remains by far the most popular national figure in the Republican Party.

In another clip, Ms. Ryan said, “President Trump asked us to be in DC on the 6th, so that was our way of stopping the theft.”

After Joseph R. Biden Jr. denounced the attack on television and asked Mr. Trump to speak on national television and “demand an end to this siege,” one rioter asked, “He doesn’t know that President Trump called us to siege Has?” the place?”

The impeachment managers stressed that despite the five deaths and dozens of injuries among police officers alone, including broken ribs and broken spinal discs, Mr Trump never apologized for what happened on Jan. 6.

“President Trump’s lack of remorse and refusal to answer during the attack shows his state of mind,” said California representative Ted Lieu, a manager. “It shows that he intended the January 6th events to take place. And when it happened, he was happy about it. “

The managers stressed that Mr Trump’s behavior – selling false conspiracy theories and fraudulent claims, praising violence, skewing facts to fit his agenda – was not limited to the presidential fight and elections, and showed video clips of some of the most shocking and most controversial moments of his presidency. Among them was the deadly protest by white nationalists in Charlottesville, Virginia after Mr. Trump encouraged the white supremacy movement in a way that no president had done in generations.

Jamie Raskin, the chief impeachment manager, asked the Senators, “Is there a political leader in this room who believes Donald Trump would stop inciting violence in order to find his way if he ever gets back to the Oval Office from the Senate? ? “

Throughout the impeachment process, House managers have commended former Vice President Mike Pence for standing up against Mr Trump and refusing to reject the vote of the electoral college for re-election.

“Vice President Pence showed us what it means to be an American,” said Lieu on Wednesday. “What it means to show courage. He has put his country, his oath, his values ​​and his morals above the will of a man. “

It was unusual praise to hear from Democrats after Mr Pence worked with his burning boss for four years, which, according to critics, only allowed Mr Trump to do.

Managers stressed that the rioters wanted to assassinate the country’s second in command, Mr. Pence, which appeared to appeal to the Republican senators’ appeal to the sacred chain of command.

“During the attack, the vice president never left the Capitol and remained locked in the building with his family – with his family -” said representative Stacey E. Plaskett, a manager and delegate of the Virgin Islands Non-Voting House. “Remember that as you think about these images and sounds of the attack. The vice president, our deputy, was always the focus. Vice President Pence has been threatened with death by the president’s supporters for rejecting President Trump’s request to overthrow the election. “

Mr. Pence, a former congressman and governor of Indiana, has been largely out of sight since leaving office. At the end of January, he was seen on vacation with his wife in the Virgin Islands.

Earlier this month, Mr Pence announced that he had joined the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.

The house’s impeachment executives closed three days of emotional footage of the attack. They showed Senators how close they were to the violent crowd of Trump supporters as they ducked and ran to safety that day. At times the videos and recordings seemed to resonate with the Republicans in the room. Some of them even praised the work of the property managers. But it wasn’t enough to change her mind.

On Thursday, before the managers closed their case, Republican Senator John Boozman of Arkansas told reporters that he would vote to acquit Mr. Trump. He predicted that the 43 other Republicans who voted with him to find that a former president’s attempt was unconstitutional would also vote for the acquittal.

To get a conviction, Senate Democrats would have to support 17 of their Republican counterparts, and that was never an expected outcome.

“Impeachment is dead on arrival,” Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul predicted last month.

Sabrina Tavernise, Luke Broadwater and Glenn Thrush contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

5 Takeaways From Day One among Trump’s Second Impeachment Trial

The second impeachment trial of former President Donald J. Trump began on Tuesday, 370 days after he was acquitted of high crimes and offenses in his first trial. He is accused of “instigating a riot” for sparking violence in the US Capitol on January 6th. The House impeachment managers and Mr Trump’s defense team argued over whether the Constitution would allow the Senate to hold a trial against a former president and ultimately decided he could move forward.

Here are some takeaways from day one.

In a 56-44 vote, the Senate dismissed Mr Trump’s defense team’s argument and decided, largely partisan, that he had the authority to bring an accused former president to justice. This paved the way for Wednesday’s trial.

Impeachment executives, led by Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, argued that the rejection of this impeachment trial would constitute a “January exception” that would set the precedent for a Lame Duck president to act inconsistently in the final weeks of his tenure .

The defense team called the prosecutor’s case a “quick impeachment” and argued that a former president does not need to stand trial because it would set the precedent for punishing a former official after leaving office at the whim of the party in power.

Only a simple majority was required on the question of jurisdiction, in contrast to the two-thirds majority required for a conviction. Six Republicans, along with all 50 Democrats, decided that the Senate could continue the process.

In a 13-minute video of scenes from the January 6 attack on the Capitol, the House’s chief impeachment manager, Mr. Raskin, showed a graphical visual record of the attack, including the explicit language of the rioters and riot shouts, as well as clips from Mr. Trumps Comments during the day – like his speech to followers before some of them stormed the Capitol and a Twitter post hours after the attacks, in which he wrote, “Remember that day forever.”

The Trump impeachment ›

What you need to know

    • A court case will determine whether former President Donald J. Trump is guilty of instigating a deadly crowd of his supporters when they stormed the Capitol on January 6, violently violated security measures, and went into hiding when they met to certify President Biden’s victory.
    • Parliament voted 232 votes to 197 in favor of a single impeachment trial, accusing Mr. Trump of “inciting violence against the United States government” in order to dismiss the election results. Ten Republicans voted against him alongside the Democrats.
    • To convict Mr. Trump, the Senate would need a two-thirds majority to approve. This means that at least 17 Republican senators would have to vote with Senate Democrats to convict.
    • A conviction seems unlikely. Last month, only five Senate Republicans sided with the Democrats in repelling a Republican attempt to dismiss the charges because Mr Trump is no longer in office. On the eve of the start of the trial, only 28 senators say they are not sure whether to convict Mr Trump.
    • If the Senate convicts Mr. Trump and finds him guilty of “inciting violence against the United States government,” the Senators could vote on whether to expel him from office. This vote would only require a simple majority, and when it came to party lines, the Democrats would prevail if Vice President Kamala Harris casts the casting vote.
    • If the Senate doesn’t condemn Mr Trump, the former president could run for office again. Public opinion polls show he remains by far the most popular national figure in the Republican Party.

The scenes of chaos in the video showed a crowd of protesters forcibly pushing past security barricades and police lines. Shots from inside the building included an officer screaming as he was knocked down by a door and another officer shot killing one of the rioters, Ashli ​​Babbitt.

For many of the Senators on Tuesday, the footage provided different angles than what they saw firsthand when they were brought out of the same Senate Chamber in shock and fear.

“They are asking what a great crime and misdemeanor our constitution is,” Raskin told the senators at the end of the video. “This is a high crime and misdemeanor. If that is not a criminal offense, there is no such thing. “

One of Mr. Trump’s defense lawyers, David I. Schoen, accused the property managers of hiring a “film company” to put together the most disturbing footage of the day. Mr Schön also offered a video account with a collection of calls by Democrats to impeach Mr Trump over the past four years, a false equivalency as none of these comments resulted in violence.

While this is a new Senate – with Democrats in the majority – and the way Mr Trump is accused is different from the allegations he faced in his first impeachment trial, there is no question that Mr Trump will ultimately is acquitted, just like a year ago.

It would take the Democrats 17 Republicans to break with and vote with the former president to have the two-thirds necessary to convict Mr Trump. If the six Republican senators who voted with Democrats Tuesday on the Senate’s right to hold the trial also voted to convict Mr. Trump, it would take Democrats 11 more Republican defectors to get a conviction.

For Democrats, a guilty verdict would be a formal, permanent waiver of Mr. Trump’s behavior. Should Mr Trump be convicted, the Senate could vote to decide whether to run again for office – something the Democrats have argued is in the best interests of the country.

An acquittal would allow Republicans to postpone the conviction of their party’s most popular member. But it would only delay the inevitable reckoning of their party faces between the moderate members and the far right wing, which not only defends Mr Trump but seeks to punish other Republicans for betraying him.

For the Democrats, an acquittal could still be some sort of political victory, as the trial was an opportunity to publicly condemn Mr Trump’s actions in his final days as president and provide a formal record of the Republican senators who refused to accept him to punish.

Senator Mike Lee, Republican of Utah, has already been criticized for proposing that Mr. Trump be given a passport for the January 6th events.

“Look, everyone makes mistakes, everyone is entitled to a mulligan every now and then,” Lee said on Fox News after the property managers argued, using a golf term for a do-over.

As the longest-serving Democrat in the Senate, 80-year-old Leahy is the chairman of the Senate trial against Mr Trump.

Last year, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. held that role, an appointment set out in the Constitution. This time, however, Chief Justice Roberts was not interested in the job. And because the constitution does not provide who should oversee the trial of a former president, it fell to Mr Leahy and gave him the power to rule on key issues such as admissible evidence.

On January 6th, Mr. Leahy was among the lawmakers who had to move away from the violent crowd, making him one of the hundreds of witnesses who were at the Capitol that day. And as one of 100 Senators, he will also vote on whether to convict Mr Trump of inciting violence against the United States.

Mr Leahy’s three hats were a reminder, among other things, that while these trials in the Senate are referred to as trials, they are not comparable to those in courtrooms across the country.

Mr Trump’s defense team unsuccessfully argued that Mr Leahy’s conflict of interest is one reason the trial is unconstitutional.

Bruce L. Castor Jr., the attorney who began the Trump defense team’s arguments Tuesday, led Senators down a tortuous path of generalizations about the Senate, Mr. Trump’s right to freedom of expression, and the difference between murder and manslaughter in criminal justice.

“I have no idea what he’s doing,” said Alan M. Dershowitz, who served on Mr. Trump’s defense team during his first impeachment last year, on conservative television station Newsmax. “Maybe he’ll bring it home, but at the moment it doesn’t seem like an effective advocacy.”

While Mr. Castor was speaking, other senators looked restless and began to talk to each other.

“The president’s attorney kept moving,” Republican Senator John Cornyn told reporters after the trial ended. “I’ve seen a lot of lawyers and a lot of arguments and that wasn’t the best I’ve ever seen.”

Mr Schön, another of Mr Trump’s attorneys, seemed to regain attention in the room when he argued that the Constitution does not allow the impeachment of a former president.

“This process will tear this country apart, perhaps as we have seen it only once in our history,” said Mr Schön, an obvious reference to the civil war. “For political reasons,” he added, “it is wrong, how wrong it can be for all of us as a nation.”

Glenn Thrush contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

What to Watch in Trump’s Impeachment Trial

The second impeachment trial against former President Donald J. Trump begins Tuesday, about a month after he was indicted by the House of Representatives for rioting over his role in fighting a violent mob that stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Here’s what you need to know.

Senate Democrats and Republicans, along with House impeachment executives and Mr Trump’s legal team, reached a bipartisan agreement on Monday that aims to pave the way for a particularly fast and efficient process that could be completed early next week.

The rules allow each side up to 16 hours to present their case. The Senate stands ready to vote to approve the rules and officially begin the process on Tuesday at 1 p.m.

Up to four hours are spent debating the constitutionality of the indictment against a president who is no longer in office. When a simple majority of the senators agree to go ahead as expected, the main part of the process begins.

As of Wednesday, prosecutors and defense have 16 hours each to present their cases to the senators, who act as the jury. The oral presentations will continue at least until Friday, but could extend into the next week.

Tradition dictates that senators then have at least one day to ask questions. This time, senators can give property managers the opportunity to force a debate and vote on calling witnesses. However, it is unclear whether they will choose to do this. The process is expected to end with final arguments and a final vote on Mr Trump’s conviction.

The Trump impeachment ›

What you need to know

    • A court case will determine whether former President Donald J. Trump is guilty of instigating a deadly crowd of his supporters when they stormed the Capitol on January 6, violently violated security measures, and went into hiding when they met to certify President Biden’s victory.
    • Parliament voted 232 votes to 197 in favor of a single impeachment trial, accusing Mr. Trump of “inciting violence against the United States government” in order to dismiss the election results. Ten Republicans voted against him alongside the Democrats.
    • To convict Mr. Trump, the Senate would need a two-thirds majority to approve. This means that at least 17 Republican senators would have to vote with Senate Democrats to convict.
    • A conviction seems unlikely. Last month, only five Senate Republicans sided with the Democrats in repelling a Republican attempt to dismiss the charges because Mr Trump is no longer in office. On the eve of the start of the trial, 28 senators said they weren’t sure to convict Mr Trump.
    • If the Senate convicts Mr. Trump and finds him guilty of “inciting violence against the United States government,” the Senators could vote on whether to expel him from office. This vote would only require a simple majority, and when it came to party lines, the Democrats would prevail if Vice President Kamala Harris casts the casting vote.
    • If the Senate doesn’t condemn Mr Trump, the former president could run for office again. Public opinion polls show he remains by far the most popular national figure in the Republican Party.

In a fast-paced and cinematic case, property managers will argue before the Senate that Mr. Trump is guilty of causing a lethal crowd of his supporters to storm the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Prosecutors plan to show videos taken of the crowd, Mr. Trump’s unvarnished words, and criminal pleas from rioters who said they were acting at the orders of the former president. In an attempt to rekindle outrage over the attack that submerged lawmakers when they met to confirm President Biden’s victory, the property managers are seeking a conviction and preventing Mr Trump from holding office again .

“We think every American should know what happened,” Maryland Democrat Representative Jamie Raskin said in an interview. “The reason he was charged by the House of Representatives and why he should be convicted and expelled from the future federal office is to make sure that such an attack on our democracy and constitution never happens again.”

In a 78-page brief filed on Monday, Mr Trump’s attorneys argued that impeachment proceedings were unconstitutional because Congress had no basis on which to judge a former president. No past president has ever been charged, but the trial is not without precedent: the Senate tried a war minister on trial in the 1870s after he resigned.

On Friday, more than 140 constitutional attorneys targeted the argument put forward by Mr. Trump’s attorneys, calling it “legally frivolous”. However, it could still give Republican senators political protection to dismiss charges on a technical issue without forcing them to focus on Mr Trump’s conduct.

Whatever disputes play out during the week, few expect enough Senate Republicans to vote differently than in Mr. Trump’s first impeachment trial.

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, said this on Sunday and suggested on the CBS Face the Nation program that the outcome of the trial was “really not in doubt”.

When the Senate voted to acquit Mr. Trump last year, Utah Senator Mitt Romney was the only Republican to join the Democrats in condemnation.

This time he may not be alone.

Several other Republicans, including Senators Ben Sasse from Nebraska, Patrick J. Toomey from Pennsylvania and Susan Collins from Maine, said they had serious concerns about Mr. Trump’s role in inciting violence.

Less than two weeks ago, 45 Republicans voted to dismiss the entire impeachment process as unconstitutional, strongly suggesting that the 67-vote threshold required for conviction – or two-thirds of the chamber – may be out of reach.

The New York Times Convention team will follow developments on Capitol Hill. Visit nytimes.com for full week coverage.

The process is also streamed online from C-SPAN and televised by major networks such as CNN and PBS.

Categories
Politics

Trump Lawyer Asks to Pause Impeachment Trial if It Runs Into Sabbath

It is unclear how the Senate leaders will comply with Mr. Schön’s request. If they rushed the process to ensure it was completed by Friday sundown, it would be by far the fastest impeachment trial of the president in history. If they put it on hold, as Mr. Schön has requested, the process could turn into a federal holiday on Monday and a holiday week for the Senate during which its members should take a break to go home to their states. If leaders instead chose to delay this further, it would support the planned measures to confirm Mr Biden’s nominations and further develop his pandemic relief law.

Mr Schön said in a telephone interview on Friday that he had not heard from the leaders about a number of issues related to the trial, including the timing and time each side would be given to present their arguments. It is expected that Mr Schumer, who negotiated these matters with Mr McConnell, will provide the details shortly before the trial begins.

Mr. Schön is part of a second group of attorneys who have represented Mr. Trump in his second impeachment trial. The first team resigned after their lawyers refused to set the former president’s preferred trial strategy – that they would defend him by reiterating his unsubstantiated claims that the election had been stolen from him.

Now Mr. Schön is joining a list of prominent Jews who have encountered problems in Washington because of Sabbath observance. Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner, the daughter and son-in-law of the former president who are Orthodox Jews, said they received special permission from a rabbi to attend Mr. Trump’s opening ceremonies in 2017. They said they had at least received a similar exemption once later in Mr. Trump’s presidency to travel on the Sabbath.

During the impeachment trial of Bill Clinton in 1999, then Connecticut Senator Joseph I. Lieberman, an observant Jew, went four miles from his Georgetown apartment to Capitol Hill to serve as a juror. Because Jewish law teaches that one can break the Sabbath when it comes to “caring for human life”, Mr. Lieberman, in consultation with his rabbis, has developed his own rule that he is not allowed to engage in purely political activities on the Sabbath . but would attend the Senate meetings and vote if necessary.

However, he did not ride in a car or elevator, which is a restriction resulting from a ban on the generation of sparks and fire.

Mr Schön’s request now has to be taken into account with decades of rules for impeachment proceedings as well as the timetable, work habits and politics of the Senate. The rules state that the Senate should meet for impeachment trials Monday through Saturday and only pause on Sunday, the schedule followed during both the final trial of Mr Trump and the trial of Mr Clinton.

Categories
Health

UK trial experiments with mixing Covid vaccines

Empty vials containing the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine are seen at a drive-through vaccination facility operated by the Lake County Health Department in Groveland, Florida on January 28, 2021.

Paul Hennessy | NurPhoto | Getty Images

LONDON – A study is being launched in the UK to see if using different Covid-19 vaccines for first and second dose will help make nationwide immunization programs more flexible.

The study, led by Oxford University and conducted by the National Immunization Schedule Evaluation Consortium, will assess the feasibility of using a vaccine for the initial “prime” vaccination other than the subsequent “booster” vaccination.

It is hoped that the study will help policymakers understand whether mixing different Covid vaccines could be a viable way to increase the flexibility of vaccination programs, and whether it could even offer better protection.

“If we show that these vaccines can be used interchangeably on the same schedule, it will greatly increase the flexibility of vaccine delivery and could provide guidance on how protection against new strains of the virus can be enhanced,” said Matthew Snape, chief investigator of the process and associate Professor of Pediatrics and Vaccine at Oxford University said Thursday.

Officially known as the “COVID-19 Heterologous Prime Boost” study but dubbed the “Com-Cov” study, the study will recruit over 800 volunteers aged 50 and over in England to study the four different combinations of Prime and to evaluate booster vaccination.

A first dose of the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine will be tested, followed by a booster with either the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine or another dose of the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine. Research will also look at a first dose of the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine, followed by a booster with either the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine or another dose of the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine. The British government has called the process a “world first”.

These are evaluated in two different dosing schedules: at an interval of four weeks to allow early intermediate reading of the data, and at an interval of 12 weeks. This latter dose interval is the current UK vaccination policy: delaying the second dose means that more people can get their first vaccines sooner with a shortage of vaccinations.

Although the policy has been viewed as controversial, some experts fear that it could make vaccines used in the UK less effective. So far only the candidates from the University of Oxford-AstraZeneca and Pfizer-BioNTech are used. The Moderna shot is due to be added to the vaccine basket later this spring.

However, Oxford University published a study on Wednesday that showed that a 12 week delay between the first and second dose of the AstraZeneca sting increased the vaccine’s effectiveness.

The researchers found that the shot was 76% effective at preventing symptomatic infection for three months after a single dose, and that the effectiveness rate increased to 82.4% if there was an interval of at least 12 weeks before the second dose. When the second dose was given less than six weeks after the first, the rate of effectiveness was 54.9%.

How the Com-Cov study will work

In the latest “Com-Cov” study, researchers will collect blood samples from volunteers from the study and monitor the effects of various dosage regimens on participants’ immune responses, as well as looking for additional side effects for the new vaccine combinations.

The study will last 13 months and was funded by the Vaccines Taskforce, established last April by the UK to coordinate efforts to research and manufacture a coronavirus vaccine, with £ 7 million of government funding (9, USD 5 million).

Professor Snape said the study was “tremendously exciting” before adding that “it will provide information that is critical to the launch of vaccines in the UK and globally”.

The richer countries are making every effort to vaccinate as many people as possible to limit the spread of infections and prevent hospitals from being overrun, which harms the economy.

Britain was hit hard by the pandemic, with cases spiking over the winter, aided by a more virulent variant of the virus that has emerged in south-east England and has now become a dominant strain in the country.

The UK currently has the fourth highest number of cases in the world with over 3.8 million confirmed infections. This comes from a record by Johns Hopkins University and recorded 109,547 deaths.

The UK government was quick to pre-order coronavirus vaccines from various manufacturers early last year and approve the vaccines currently in use. The vaccination program has been widely praised for its agility and range. The aim is to vaccinate 15 million people across the four top priority groups, including health and care workers, the elderly and the over 70s, and those who are considered to be extremely clinically at risk by mid-February.

The latest government data from Wednesday shows that just over 10 million people have received their first dose of vaccine and nearly 500,000 have received a second dose. The UK-made Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine makes up the bulk of the UK vaccination program.

Professor Jonathan Van-Tam, deputy chief medical officer and senior responsible officer for the study, said the research may even show that alternating vaccines could increase the amount of antibodies needed to fight a possible Covid-19 infection.

“It’s even possible that the combination of vaccines may improve the immune response, resulting in even higher antibody levels that last longer. If this isn’t evaluated in a clinical trial, we just don’t know. This study will give us a better one Provide insight into how We can use vaccines to keep abreast of this dire disease, “he said.

The British vaccination minister Nadhim Zahawi told the BBC on Thursday that the country’s vaccination program will continue as usual for the time being: “At the moment we are not going to change anything,” Zahawi told the “Today” program.

“If you got a Pfizer BioNTech vaccine for your first dose, you got a Pfizer BioNTech vaccine for your second. If you had Oxford-AstraZeneca, you got Oxford-AstraZeneca for your second dose.”