Categories
Health

How CRISPR gene enhancing will deal with illness: Intellia founder Doudna

The gene editing technology CRISPR reached an important milestone last weekend and completed its first systemic drug delivery to the human body.

CRISPR, or clustered, regularly spaced short palindromic repeats, cuts genomes and cuts DNA effectively to treat genetic diseases.

The latest breakthrough, the result of a study between biotech company Regeneron and Boston startup Intellia Therapeutics, treats a rare disease after it has been given as an IV infusion. Previously, other uses of CRISPR technology have been limited to ex vivo therapy, or where cells are removed from the body for genetic manipulation in a laboratory and then returned to the body.

Jennifer Doudna, who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2020 for her work on CRISPR gene editing and is the co-founder of Intellia, recently told CNBC about the development of the technology from the publication of her early work to clinical studies showing its effectiveness at treating disease in less than 10 years means “one of the fastest rollouts in my opinion of technology from basic, initial science to actual application.”

“This is mainly because the technology comes at a time when there is a huge demand for genome editing and a lot of knowledge about genomes,” said Doudna at the recent CNBC Global Evolve Summit in mid-June.

As for next, Doudna highlighted several challenges and opportunities that CRISPR has on the horizon.

Deploying CRISPR remains a major challenge

As technology continues to advance, the task of getting the processed molecules in the body to the cells in the areas where they are needed remains a challenge.

“This is a particular issue in clinical medicine where the ability to manipulate brain cells, heart cells or muscle cells has incredible potential, but right now we don’t really have the tools to introduce the editors to those cells,” said Doudna. “We have the editors; we just don’t know how to get them where they need to go.”

Sickle cell anemia was an early focus

Much of the success of CRISPR’s previous applications has been in ex vivo therapy, in which extracted cells are manipulated in a laboratory and then returned to a patient.

Sickle cell anemia, which is genetically inherited and affects approximately 100,000 Americans, according to the CDC, was a particularly good target for the technology because blood stem cells “can be harvested, processed, and then returned to patients,” Doudna said.

Genetic eye diseases were also a focus for CRISPR applications, as Doudna said, “It is certainly easier to get into the eye than other parts of the body.”

The delivery of the processed cells to the liver has also proven to be easier so far. “A liver is an organ that naturally accepts molecules in the body,” she said.

Any advance in eradicating the 100+ liver diseases could have a huge impact on the lives of Americans. According to the American Liver Foundation, at least 30 million people, or one in ten Americans, have liver disease.

Next, let’s focus on the brain, heart, muscles

The next step for innovation around CRISPR will be to move these cells to other parts of the body like the brain, heart and muscles, Doudna said.

“There are already some technologies that make some of this possible, for example with different types of viruses or virus-like particles, and I look forward to the innovations that will come in this regard over the next few years,” she said.

Treatment costs are a problem

But as technology improves and scientists become able to fight disease throughout the body, Doudna said that CRISPR technology needs to be cheaper in order for it to have “widespread effects.”

Treating sickle cell anemia with CRISPR therapy costs about $ 2 million per patient, according to Doudna.

“That is clearly not a price point that makes this available to most of the people who can benefit from it,” she said.

While addressing delivery challenges can also help reduce costs, the medical community needs to figure out how “to scale molecule production so that we can cut costs,” said Doudna.

Applying CRISPR to Agriculture

The advancement of CRISPR technology may have an impact on other industries as well, with agriculture being one of the first to benefit.

Rather than addressing genetic problems through breeding, which can take months to years, or through current methods of genetically modifying crops that have seen a boom over the past few decades but that incorporate biological material from other species, CRISPR technology can address the Genes from plants “without touch” manipulate everything else, “said Doudna.

“This opens the door to a lot of things that can be done now to both address the challenges of climate change, manage drought, and introduce properties into the plants that will protect them from pests,” she said.

Categories
Politics

A Tablet to Deal with Covid-19? The U.S. Is Betting on It.

The U.S. government spent more than $ 18 billion last year funding drug manufacturers to produce a Covid vaccine, an effort that resulted in at least five highly effective vaccinations in record time. Now, more than $ 3 billion is pouring into a neglected area of ​​research: developing pills to fight the virus at an early stage of infection that may save many lives in the years to come.

The new program, announced by the Ministry of Health on Thursday, will accelerate clinical trials of some promising drug candidates. If all goes well, some of those first pills could be ready by the end of the year. The Pandemic Antiviral Program will also support research into entirely new drugs – not just for the coronavirus, but for viruses that could cause future pandemics.

A number of other viruses, including influenza, HIV, and hepatitis C, can be treated with a simple pill. But despite more than a year of research, there isn’t a pill like this to treat someone with coronavirus infection before it wreaks havoc. Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration’s program to accelerate Covid-19 research, has invested far more money in vaccine development than in treatments, a void the new program will seek to fill.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and a key supporter of the program, said he was looking forward to a time when Covid-19 patients could pick up antiviral pills from a pharmacy once they test positive for that Coronavirus or develop Covid-19 symptoms.

“I wake up in the morning, I don’t feel very well, my sense of smell and taste goes away, I get a sore throat,” said Dr. Fauci in an interview. “I call my doctor and say, ‘I have Covid and I need a prescription.'”

Dr. Fauci’s support for antiviral pill research stems from his own experience fighting AIDS three decades ago. In the 1990s, his institute conducted research that led to some of the first antiviral pills for HIV, “protease inhibitors,” which can block an essential viral protein and keep the virus in check for life.

In the early 2000s, researchers found that an antiviral agent called sofosbuvir could cure hepatitis C nearly 100 percent of the time. Tamiflu, an over-the-counter influenza pill, can reduce recovery time from infection and reduce the chance that a flu attack will bring someone to the hospital.

At the beginning of the pandemic, researchers began testing existing antivirals in people hospitalized with severe Covid-19. But many of these studies showed no benefit from the antiviral drugs. In hindsight, the decision to work in hospitals was a mistake. Scientists now know that the best time to try to block the coronavirus is in the early days of the illness, when the virus is multiplying rapidly and the immune system has not yet built a defense.

Many people fight their infection and recover, but others have immune systems failing and starting to damage tissues instead of viruses. It is this self-inflicted damage that sends many people with Covid-19 to the hospital as the replication of the coronavirus wears off. So a drug that blocks replication early in an infection could very well fail in a study in patients who have advanced into later stages of the disease.

So far, only one antiviral has shown clear benefit for people in hospitals: remdesivir. Originally studied as a potential cure for Ebola, the drug appears to shorten the course of Covid-19 when given intravenously to patients. In October, it became the first – and so far only – antiviral drug to receive full FDA approval for the treatment of the disease.

However, remdesivir’s performance has overwhelmed many researchers. In November, the World Health Organization recommended not using the drug.

Remdesivir could work more effectively if people could take it earlier as a pill in the course of Covid-19. But in its approved formulation, the compound does not act orally. It cannot survive the passage from the mouth via the stomach to the circulatory system.

Researchers around the world are testing other antivirals that are already known to work in tablet form. One such compound called molnupiravir was developed by researchers at Emory University in 2019 and tested against viruses such as influenza and the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus.

Working with Miami-based Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, the Emory team conducted experiments on mice that were so impressive that Merck turned to them to help bring the drug into human clinical trials for Covid-19.

“We found this molecule really amazing,” said Daria Hazuda, vice president of infectious diseases and vaccine research at Merck.

However, in a study of hospitalized patients, molnupiravir did not appear to have any effect on the disease. In April, the companies announced that they would end the process.

“I see that and I say, ‘Yes, no,'” said Dr. Tim Sheahan, a virologist at the University of North Carolina. “I’m not surprised that these types of drugs would not dramatically improve the outcome of a person who has been sick for several days.”

The companies started a second study last fall, this time testing the drug on people recently diagnosed with Covid-19. This study is ongoing and Merck is recruiting volunteers at higher risk of infection, such as the elderly with obesity and diabetes. Dr. Hazuda said the study should produce clear results by October.

Last year, government funding for Covid-19 treatments focused on a handful of candidates such as monoclonal antibodies and remdesivir. Many other antiviral drug studies have been small and underfunded. In January, the new government of Biden began developing a new program of antiviral pills.

The first results of this planning could be seen last week. The Department of Health and Human Services announced that it will purchase 1.7 million doses of molnupiravir from Merck for $ 1.2 billion, provided the current study leads to Food and Drug Administration approval. According to Dr. David Kessler, the chief science officer of the Biden government’s Covid-19 response team, the government could seek similar deals for two other antivirals in clinical trials.

The hope “is that by the end of the fall we will have an antiviral that can help us close this chapter of the epidemic,” said Dr. Kessler in an interview.

One of the drugs the government is considering is AT-527, which was developed by Atea Pharmaceuticals. The compound has already been shown to be safe and effective for treating hepatitis C, and early studies suggested it could work against Covid-19 as well. Roche has partnered with Atea to test it in humans, and the companies are currently conducting a late-stage clinical trial.

The other drug on government radar was developed by scientists at Pfizer, adapted from a molecule originally developed as a potential drug for SARS in the early 2000s. This drug was on the shelf for years, but last spring scientists decided to change its structure so that it works against the protease of the new coronavirus. More than 200 Pfizer researchers have teamed up to develop the molecule, initially known as PF-07321332.

The drug was intended for intravenous use, but Pfizer researchers managed to modify its structure so that it works as a pill. When the drug was given orally to mice, it reached a concentration high enough in the body to block the coronavirus. Pfizer started a clinical trial in March to evaluate its safety in humans and expects to move to a later stage of testing next month.

Dr. Kessler acknowledged that there will be challenges in using such pills to reduce hospital stays and deaths from Covid-19. People need access to the drugs once they test positive. “Your testing programs need to be linked to your treatment,” he said.

And if the history of antiviral research is any clue, the first drugs for Covid-19 will likely offer only modest benefits against the disease, said Dr. Fauci. But that would be a good start.

“With all of these drugs we’ve looked at over the years, we’ve never landed a home run the first time,” said Dr. Fauci. “A line drive from the left field wall to the start would be really good.”

The government will also spend up to $ 1.2 billion on research centers where scientists will conduct early-stage studies on drugs that block the coronavirus in other ways. Some drugs can interfere with other essential virus proteins, while others make it impossible to copy the virus’ genes.

Even if the next generation of pills won’t hit the market for a few years, many scientists say research will be a good investment. “It could help with this pandemic and potentially be a first line of defense for the next,” said Mark Namchuk, director of therapeutic translation at Harvard Medical School.

The program will not only support research into pills that work against coronaviruses, but also against other high-risk pathogens like flaviviruses, which cause diseases like dengue and West Nile fever, and togaviruses, the mosquito-borne diseases like chikungunya cause and Eastern equine encephalitis.

“There will always be a threat,” said Dr. Fauci. “I think there will be a long-term need for drugs.”

Categories
Business

F.D.A. Approves New Drug to Deal with Vaginal Yeast Infections

The Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday approved a new drug to treat a vaginal yeast infection, which is particularly common in pregnant women who take birth control pills or take antibiotics.

The drug Brexafemme (Ibrexafungerp) manufactured by SCYNEXIS is a one-day oral treatment and the first in a new class of triterpenoid antifungal drugs. The company said the new drug will kill candida – the yeast that can cause infection.

The standard oral drug diflucan (fluconazole) inhibits the growth of yeast, but does not kill it.

But the treatment would most likely not initially be prescribed for common vaginal yeast infections. Dr. David Angulo, the company’s chief medical officer, estimated the drug’s list price at $ 350-450 for the four-tablet treatment. In comparison, GoodRx lists the average retail price of fluconazole at $ 29.81.

He said Brexafemme is approved as a first-line treatment but could also be prescribed to patients whose infections don’t go away easily.

“There is nothing new that can be offered to patients who cannot tolerate it, do not respond well or develop resistance,” said Dr. Angulo.

Dr. Sumathi Nambiar, director of the FDA’s anti-infectives division, said, “This approval of a new antifungal drug provides an additional treatment option for patients with vulvovaginal candidiasis or vaginal or vulvar yeast infections, and represents another step forward in the FDA’s overall effort to be safe and effective To ensure antifungal drugs are available to patients. “

Dr. Denise Jamieson, Chair of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Emory University School of Medicine, said she wasn’t sure the new drug was needed.

“I don’t see any tremendous resistance,” she said. “I can’t really tell if this will be a great addition or not. It is always helpful to have another option and then you have to consider things like costs and tolerances. “

According to Dr. Angulo, in a clinical study used in support of the application, showed 50 percent effectiveness – that is, a complete elimination of all signs and symptoms – 10 days after treatment and 60 percent 25 days after treatment. The other study showed 64 percent effectiveness on day 10 and 73 percent on day 25.

Dr. Michael Carome, director of the Public Citizen’s Health Research Group, was not impressed with the FDA’s approval of Brexafemme.

“This drug is not necessary and few women should need it,” said Dr. Carome. “Fluconazole is very cheap and generally very effective. The cost of this is simply outrageous.

The FDA requires SCYNEXIS to conduct several post-marketing studies, including one to assess the risks to pregnant women, the developing fetus, and newborns; and another to study how much of the product passes into the breast milk of breastfeeding women.

The drug will hit the market later this year.