Categories
World News

Threats and Worry Trigger Afghan Girls’s Protections to Vanish In a single day

It took Women for Afghan Women to build Afghanistan’s largest network of women protection services – 32 safe houses, family counseling centers and children’s homes in 14 provinces, which have been grown by word of mouth and driven by the high demand for their services.

They began closing their doors within a few days when the Taliban began their lightning advance through Afghan cities on August 6. Most of the shelter’s managers were packing or burning files, packing up a few belongings, and fling with their customers when news arrived that the Taliban were arriving.

A few directors of Safe Houses – not just those affiliated with Women for Afghan Women, but also a handful of other long-established shelters – chose to stay where they were, but remained silent for fear that everything what they said could cause harm to the women in their care. Nobody takes new cases.

“Our accommodations, our women’s protection centers, are gone. It is very unlikely that we can do most of the work we do for women as we did, ”said Sunita Viswanath, co-founder of Women for Afghan Women.

Even before the Taliban came to power, Afghanistan was at the bottom of every list when it comes to protecting women and at the top of the need for safe shelter, counseling and justice that could help keep women safe.

More than half of all Afghan women reported physical abuse and 17 percent reported sexual violence, while nearly 60 percent had forced marriages instead of arranged marriages, according to studies cited by the Afghan Ministry of Women.

Honor killings, child marriages, the payment of a bride price for a woman, and the practice of baad – trafficking young girls to pay the elders’ debts, which is equivalent to selling a child into slavery – still exist in rural areas . Everywhere, harassment of women in the workplace and in public is a constant, as is psychological abuse, according to recent studies.

As the uprising progressed, the first concern of staff at Women for Afghan Women and others who operate similar shelters was what the Taliban might do to punish them. As the country’s ruler in the 1990s, the Taliban fought vehemently against women traveling alone or gathering.

Relatively new examples of Taliban’s behavior are worrying. When the Taliban briefly took over the city of Kunduz in 2015, the operators and customers of the women’s refuge for Afghan women fled when threatening phone calls came in from the insurgents. The shelter manager described being actively hunted and said she got calls from the Taliban saying they would catch her as an example and hang her in the village square.

But it is not just the fear of the Taliban that is terrifying the shelter operators and their customers this time around. Taliban fighters have come to some of the shelters in the past few weeks. Sometimes they destroyed the site and took over the buildings, but there are still no reports of them causing harm to anyone, said Ms. Viswanath, the group’s co-founder.

“As far as I know, none of our employees have been beaten, attacked or killed,” she said.

Much of the concern stems from the waves of prisoners released during the Taliban’s advance. Among them were men detained under the women’s protection laws that have been enacted with Western support over the past 20 years. The former prisoners hold a grudge not only against the female relative who spoke out against them and publicly humiliated her, but also against all who supported these efforts – the directors of the safe house, advisors and lawyers.

A woman from rural Baghlan Province, who spoke on condition of anonymity for receiving death threats, described how she now changes her place to sleep every few nights. She had previously worked with prosecutors to gather evidence of abuse in cases involving women

Updated

9/2/2021, 5:49 p.m. ET

“After conquering the cities, the Taliban released all prisoners. Among those prisoners were some who were sentenced for my work, ”she said. “Now they are threatening me and there is no government or system to go to and take shelter. I only hide in one place or another. “

The shelters have long been targets. For many in Afghanistan’s strictly patriarchal society – not just the Taliban – a woman who is on her own or abandons her family is often viewed as a prostitute. Some see shelters for abused women as a thin panel for brothels.

In the last 15 years, however, despite the societal antagonism towards the protection of women, more and more people have started looking for shelters. Women, often with terrible injuries – broken bones or internal injuries from severe blows – kept knocking on the unmarked gates or ordinary houses where Relief Society groups took in people.

Whether or not these operations continue is firmly in the hands of the Taliban, who are expected to enact their own laws governing the behavior of women. That will leave the former Afghan government’s law on the elimination of violence against women and other protective measures on an uncertain basis.

For the time being, Taliban officials have given assurances that women are allowed to work and, in some cases, travel without the company of a male relative – “as permitted by Sharia law” or Islamic law. Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid surprised some when, after other Taliban officials urged Afghan women to stay home temporarily for their own safety, he admitted that many in the ranks of the Taliban could not be trusted to be polite and that they should be educated.

Understanding the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan

Map 1 of 6

Who are the Taliban? The Taliban emerged in 1994 amid the unrest following the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989. They used brutal public punishments, including flogging, amputation and mass executions, to enforce their rules. Here is more about their genesis and track record as rulers.

Who are the Taliban leaders? These are the top leaders of the Taliban, men who for years have been on the run, in hiding, in prison and dodging American drones. Little is known about them or how they plan to rule, including whether they will be as tolerant as they say they are. A spokesman told the Times that the group wanted to forget their past but had some restrictions.

But the Taliban made similar statements after taking control of the capital and most of the country in 1996.

“The explanation was that security wasn’t good and they were waiting for security to get better and then women to have more freedom,” said Heather Barr, assistant director of women’s rights at Human Rights Watch. “But in the years they were in power, of course, that moment never came – and I can promise you that the Afghan women who hear this today think that it will never happen this time either.”

For Mahbouba, a longtime activist who has spent much of her life fighting to protect Afghan women, the picture is not yet clear. But she says she gives the Taliban the benefit of the doubt for now. With her claim that everything must be done according to Sharia law because that is the religion of Afghanistan, she has nothing against it.

But the Taliban’s interpretation of Sharia law will also be important, she said.

“We just have to wait and see what happens. The Taliban haven’t really started anything yet – check in in a month, in two months, in six months, ”she said.

Mahbouba, whom the Times identifies by name only to protect her and her organization, oversees a long-standing safe house for women. She hasn’t escaped or closed her doors, but she’s holding back and calibrating what she tells the news media, she said.

When some Taliban recently came into her office and said the women were being held against their will, Mahbouba said she did not let them in but went outside to speak to them.

They told her they heard that “some women are being held here.” She rejected that and instead said she was defending the honor of Afghan women.

“I don’t let them take to the streets to be used and abused by other people; they are the victims of domestic violence, ”she recalls. “So instead of running away and letting you go into prostitution, I have kept your honor and protect you.”

The Taliban appeared to accept this statement, and Mahbouba said she was determined to have a dialogue with them.

But she also made a request: please, she said, “keep watching, and if our world goes crazy and it gets really terrible, we can let people know.”

A New York Times employee contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Elizabeth Warren presses Janet Yellen to deal with crypto market threats

Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Holds a press conference outside of the Capitol on Tuesday, April 27, 2021 to reinstate the Universal Childcare and Early Education Act.

Tom Williams | CQ Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

Senator Elizabeth Warren called on Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Tuesday to identify and address cryptocurrency risks and create a “comprehensive and coordinated” framework through which federal agencies can continuously regulate virtual coins.

Warren, a member of the Senate Banking Committee and longtime critic of the country’s largest banks, urged the Treasury Secretary to use her powers on the Financial Stability Oversight Council to create a more secure crypto market.

“The FSOC must act quickly to use its legal powers to address the risks of cryptocurrencies and regulate the market to ensure the safety and stability of consumers and our financial system,” the Massachusetts Democrat wrote in a letter to Yellen .

“As the demand for cryptocurrencies continues to grow and these assets become more embedded in our financial system, consumers, the environment and our financial system are exposed to increasing threats,” she added.

Warren named five risks posed by an under-regulated crypto market. In her words it is:

  • Exposure to hedge funds and other investment vehicles with no transparency
  • Risks for banks
  • Unique threats from stablecoins
  • Used in cyber attacks that can disrupt the financial system
  • Risks from decentralized financing

A Treasury Department spokesman did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

Warren’s letter also came as she and other lawmakers held a hearing on the Senate Banking Committee entitled “Cryptocurrencies: What Are They Good For?”

Senators will grill Coin Center Executive Director Jerry Brito, Filecoin Foundation Chair Marta Belcher, and Angela Walch, a research fellow at University College London’s Center for Blockchain Technologies, during Tuesday’s hearing.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

“Cryptocurrencies and other digital assets present significant risks right now, and the risks they pose are increasing as they permeate the traditional financial system and more and more people are investing,” Walch told lawmakers in a written statement. Her Twitter bio advises readers “not to own crypto”.

Warren’s letter is the latest in a series of calls from Capitol Hill for tighter market regulation.

Perhaps the most prominent example came in February when lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle pecked executives at brokerage firm Robinhood, social media website Reddit, market maker Citadel Securities, and video game retailer GameStop about “gamifying” stock trading.

However, regulating crypto markets has proven to be a more difficult task given the sheer number of different assets as well as the novelty of the technology behind digital currencies. To date, it is unclear which body – the FSOC, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or Congress itself – will ultimately be responsible for the day-to-day oversight of crypto trading.

That’s probably why Warren addressed her letter to Yellen in her role at FSOC.

Established after the 2008 financial crisis, the FSOC is headed by the Treasury Secretary and brings together 10 state financial regulators, including the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Commodities Future Trading Commission.

The council’s role is to identify risks to the financial industry and coordinate a regulatory response between cabinet departments and other agencies, as no single regulator is responsible for overseeing and addressing global risks to financial stability.

The SEC, under the new leadership of Chairman Gary Gensler, is currently considering approving exchange-traded funds that track Bitcoin’s performance. Many investors say that given the recent rally in Bitcoin and the extensive amount of futures and other derivatives trading in the space, the decision cannot come soon enough.

So far, Gensler has said investor protection should apply to crypto exchanges, and the Federal Reserve is considering issuing central bank digital currency.

Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee, including ranking member Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania and Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, argue that Congress should better understand the potential uses of cryptocurrencies while keeping illegal activity at bay.

Toomey and Lummis are investigating the value and possible uses of so-called stablecoins or digital currencies that are linked to national currencies such as the US dollar.

“It’s important to note that people have raised legitimate issues with cryptocurrencies,” Toomey said in prepared remarks on Tuesday morning. “But we shouldn’t lose sight of the enormous potential benefits that distributed ledger technology offers.”

“We should also keep in mind that private innovation has made most of these developments possible,” he added. “We shouldn’t suppress the concepts of individual entrepreneurship and empowerment that made this innovation possible.”

– CNBC’s Stephanie Dhue contributed to this article.

Categories
World News

A French Teenager’s Anti-Islam Rant Unleashed Demise Threats. Now 13 Are on Trial.

PARIS – The 16-year-old French woman shared very personal details about her life, including her attraction to women, on a livestream on Instagram. Just no black or Arab women, she said.

When in January 2020 her Instagram account received insults and death threats in response to her comments, some of which said it was an affront to Islam, teenage Mila dug in and quickly posted another video.

“I hate religion,” she said. “The Koran is a religion of hatred.” She also used profanity to describe Islam and the crudest of images to refer to God.

The subsequent onslaught of threats after the video went viral brought 13 people to justice for online harassment.

The case has put the spotlight on the heated French debate over freedom of expression and blasphemy, especially when it comes to Islam. It is also a landmark test of recent legislation expanding France’s definition of cyber-harassment in relation to attacks on the internet, where vitriol is abundant but less modulated debate.

“We set the rules for what is acceptable and what is not,” said Michaël Humbert, the presiding judge, at the hearing.

Some looked back into history to capture the brutality of what Mila was witnessing online. Mila’s attorney said she had been digitally stoned. The prosecutor spoke in the case of a “Lyncherei 2.0”.

More than a year after Mila – the New York Times withholds her last name for being the subject of harassment – posted her videos, her life remains in a turmoil. She lives under police protection and no longer goes to school in person.

The 13 accused, some of whom are teenagers themselves, are on trial in Paris, most of them charged with death threats. You face jail time. The verdict is expected on Wednesday.

Most defendants have regretted the tone of their online comments – but the case has taken on a life of its own.

It exposed the deep polarization in French society over freedom of expression following the terrorist attacks on Charlie Hebdo, the satirical newspaper that published the cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, and the decapitation last year of a teacher who showed similar cartoons during a class Discussion about freedom of expression.

Some of the defendants said they had no intention of harassing or threatening Mila. They were just kidding, venting, or trying to attract followers, they said.

But many of the comments were extremely snappy. The process only affects messages sent in November after Mila posted another video describing her continued online harassment – and reiterating some of her own crude imagery that sparked a flurry of new digital attacks.

When the presiding judge read some of them out loud at the trial, they made them gasp.

One of an 18-year-old psychology student named N’Aissita said: “It would be a real pleasure for me to tear your body apart with my finest knife and let it rot in the forest.” Another of a 19-year-old aspiring customs officer named Adam said, “Someone is going to come to your home, someone is going to tie you up and torture you.”

(A court clerk refused to fully identify the defendants to the Times; it is customary in France, especially in cases involving juveniles, not to publish the names of defendants unless they are public figures. )

Mila has repeatedly said that she does not want to be co-opted by politicians of any ideology. But many conservatives have stood up for her cause, and she says she feels abandoned by feminist and LGBTQ advocacy groups, accusing them of being afraid to defend their right to criticize religions for fear of offending Muslims.

“I am being abandoned by a fragile and cowardly nation,” she said.

For Mila’s defenders, the virulence directed against them shows that France’s model of secularism and freedom of expression is under attack.

“We went crazy,” said President Emmanuel Macron in an interview last year when asked about Mila. In France any religion could be criticized, “and because of this criticism we must not tolerate violence”.

Mr Macron himself was at the center of the violent tug-of-war over French values ​​and the treatment of its Muslim citizens. He has vowed to defeat Islamist “separatism” or the undermining of French values ​​of secularism and freedom of expression. Several terrorist attacks in the past year have hardened the mood in French society towards extremists in their midst and aroused fear among some French Muslims that they would be unjustly stigmatized.

In a television interview several weeks after her first video, Mila said that she was targeting Islam as a religion, not those who practice it in peace, and she apologized for hurting these people with her comments.

That’s an important difference in France, which criminalizes some hate speech but doesn’t prohibit blasphemy. The law distinguishes between ridiculing a religion and vilifying its believers. On this basis, prosecutors quickly closed an investigation they had opened against Mila on suspicion of incitement to racial hatred.

Instead, based on the Cyber ​​Harassment Act passed in 2018, the police opened an investigation into those who followed them online. The law allows prosecutors to seek convictions against molesters who knew they were contributing to a wider wave of abuse, even if they didn’t coordinate with each other and even if they only posted or sent a comment.

In a recent book, Mila went back on some of her regrets, saying that at the time of the television interview, she was desperate to calm the situation but should not apologize for the legal use of her freedom of speech.

The defendants were charged with online harassment, which resulted in a prison sentence of up to two years and a fine of € 30,000, or nearly $ 36,000. Those charged with death threats face up to three years in prison and a fine of 45,000 euros.

Defense lawyers asked why these 13 were chosen when thousands of people attacked Mila online.

The prosecutor said he expected to hold others accountable as well.

“Social media is not a lawless wild west,” said prosecutor Grégory Weill, who heads a new office that deals with hate speech and online harassment across France.

Nevertheless, Mr. Weill requested only short suspended sentences for 12 of the defendants, all of whom were first-time offenders. (He recommended that the charges against the 13th be dropped.) The court could be more severe in all of the sentences it imposes.

For two long days last month, the case against the 13 unfolded in a crowded courtroom.

Mila’s mother said her daughter experienced an endless “tsunami” of news that caused nightmares, depression and trauma. Mila fought vigorously against critics, but also in tears.

“I feel like I have rows of knives in my back all the time,” she said.

She turned down suggestions to leave social media, where she still clashes with critics, but also posts typical teenage content, like videos of herself lip-syncing songs.

“I see it like a woman who was raped on the street and who is told not to go out again so that she doesn’t get raped again,” said Mila. She added that she doesn’t like all religions, not just Islam.

Richard Malka, Mila’s attorney, castigated the defendants as easily offended, but slow to realize the consequences of their actions.

“You made them all radioactive,” said Mr. Malka. “You condemned her to loneliness.”

Although some of the defendants claimed to be Muslim, some of them claimed to be atheists. Some said Mila’s comments pissed them off because they had Muslim friends or found their videos disrespectful, which made them stop thinking.

“I reacted in the heat of the moment,” said Axel, a 20-year-old from southwest France, in court. “I don’t pay attention to religion, but all religions should be equal and respected.”

One of the defendants, Corentin, a 23-year-old school observer, said he could not understand religious intolerance. In his Twitter post wishing Mila would die, Corentin said he was not a criminal offense because he was “knowledgeable and an unbeliever”.

And when Mila’s attorney argued that religions deserve no respect and that respecting religious beliefs “leads to horror,” disagreed with N’Aissita, the psychology student who wrote about Mila’s knife.

“If religious beliefs had been respected, we wouldn’t be here,” she replied.

Categories
World News

NATO members unite to face evolving threats from Russia and China

U.S. President Joe Biden attends a meeting with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg during a NATO summit, at the Alliance’s headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, June 14, 2021.

Stephanie Lecocq | Reuters

WASHINGTON  —  NATO members vowed to address a range of traditional and evolving security challenges, including several posed by China, in a joint statement released Monday at the close of their summit.

“China’s growing influence and international policies can present challenges that we need to address together as an Alliance,” the statement, known as a communique, said. “We will engage China with a view to defending the security interests of the Alliance.”

The references to China represent a victory for President Joe Biden, who was attending his first NATO summit as president.

Biden arrived at the summit intent upon rallying NATO’s 30 member-strong alliance behind a security policy that confronts both new threats, like cyberwarfare and China, as well as traditional threats, like Russia’s military incursions into Eastern Europe.

But Beijing’s ambitious military buildup also received mention in the communique.

“China is rapidly expanding its nuclear arsenal with more warheads and a larger number of sophisticated delivery systems to establish a nuclear triad,” the communique said. 

Biden has said his administration will stand “shoulder to shoulder” with America’s closest allies, breaking sharply from his predecessor’s “America First” policy.

President Donald Trump attacked NATO on a regular basis, questioning both the relevancy and the effectiveness of the decades-old alliance.

By contrast, Biden is outspoken in his belief that NATO is a cornerstone of global stability and a crucial player in confronting these evolving threats.

Yet NATO’s pivot to China, as opposed to a laser focus on Russia, is not necessarily a welcome change for everyone.

Some of NATO’s smallest members, many located in Eastern Europe, believe that deterrence against Russian aggression should be the chief concern of the alliance’s security efforts.

Biden met with the leaders of several Balkan nations on Monday morning, as well as with Poland’s president, Andrzej Duda. The U.S. military maintains a significant presence in Poland that is widely viewed as a major deterrent to Russia.

In response to the threat of hybrid warfare that Russia poses, NATO member states opened the door to potentially invoking Article 5, the mutual defense agreement, in cases of destabilizing disinformation attacks against “political institutions” and “public opinion.”

To date, Article 5 has only been invoked once — in defense of the United States in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

“We are enhancing our situational awareness and expanding the tools at our disposal to counter hybrid threats, including disinformation campaigns, by developing comprehensive preventive and response options,” the communique states.

Russia’s disinformation campaigns have hit Europe hard, notably ahead of the 2016 Brexit referendum, during the 2017 protests in Catalonia, and before the 2019 European Parliament elections.

On Tuesday, Biden will travel to Geneva for a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Biden is expected to raise many of the topics addressed in the NATO communique.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, and Chinese President Xi Jinping, right, attend the Tsinghua Universitys ceremony, at Friendship Palace on April 26, 2019 in Beijing, China.

Kenzaburo Fukuhara | Getty Images

A broader power struggle

Throughout his visit to Europe, Biden has framed the competition between Western democracies and both Russia and China as more than simply an economic or a military rivalry.

To the president, it is a battle over which system of governance will emerge as the world’s great power, Chinese-style authoritarianism or Western democracy and capitalism.

Both Moscow and Beijing regularly ignore the international rules and norms that govern trade, security, defense, labor and human rights. This constitutes a serious threat to NATO and to developing countries around the world.

In some ways, Biden’s approach to China is not that different from Trump’s.

Tensions between Beijing and Washington soared under the Trump administration, fueled by a trade war and barriers preventing Chinese technology companies from doing business in the United States.

But Biden has said his approach to China would differ from his predecessor’s in that he would work more closely with allies in order to mount pushback against Beijing.

“We will confront China’s economic abuses,” Biden said in a recent speech. “But we’re also ready to work with Beijing when it’s in America’s interest to do so. We’ll compete from a position of strength by building back better at home and working with our allies and partners.”

Biden’s message has been warmly welcomed by NATO member leaders, following four years under Trump during which the United States was a thorn in the side of the alliance.

Trump repeatedly attacked NATO during his presidency, accusing it of being irrelevant and impotent. He even threatened to pull the United States out of the alliance.

Categories
Politics

Threats towards members of Congress have greater than doubled this yr

A US Capitol Police patrol car drives past the fence on the east side of the US Capitol before President Joe Biden addresses the joint congressional session on Wednesday, April 28, 2021.

Bill Clark | CQ Appeal, Inc. | Getty Images

The threats to federal lawmakers have more than doubled this year compared to last year, the U.S. Capitol Police said on Friday.

The law enforcement agency tasked with defending Congress reported a 107% increase in threats against members of the legislature compared to the same point in 2020.

“Given the unique threat environment we currently live in, the department is confident that the number of cases will continue to increase,” the agency said in a press release published online.

The report comes months after a crowd of former President Donald Trump supporters overwhelmed the police department and stormed the Capitol to prevent Congress from confirming President Joe Biden’s victory.

The Justice Department has estimated that around 800 people were involved in the January 6 attack. More than 400 suspected rioters are currently being prosecuted and arrests continue. Steven Sund, who was in charge of police at the time of the riot, resigned on January 7th.

The release on Friday is in line with comments from lawmakers that the political atmosphere puts their security at greater risk.

In January, members of the House of Representatives sent a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., And other congressional officials requesting greater approval to use a Congressional Fund for security measures, citing heightened risks.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

Several lawmakers who backed Trump’s indictment have also increased their own security spending since the Jan. 6 attack, financial data show.

Police have previously said the threats are increasing.

In March, incumbent USCP chief Yogananda Pittman told Congress that threats against lawmakers had increased by more than 90% in the first two months of the year. Between 2017 and 2020 there was a 118.66% increase in threats and “directions of interest”.

The January 6 attack prompted the Capitol Police to seek additional funding from Congress. The police department has requested an increase in its budget for 2022 by 107 million US dollars over the budget for fiscal year 2021.

This call reflects changes to the post-uprising budget request. The original application before Jan. 6 called for a $ 36 million increase in funding from 2021.

In their press release, the police continued their efforts to get more funding. She agreed to the recommendations of the Agency’s Inspector General in April to increase her threat assessment staff and to set up a stand-alone vigilance station. Both proposals, the police department said, would “require resources and approval”.

“In her report, the [inspector general] suggests that the Department’s threat assessment division be similar to the United States Intelligence Service (USSS). In 2020, the USSS had approximately 8,000 cases with more than 100 agents and analysts. During the same period, the USCP, which has just over 30 agents and analysts, had approximately 9,000 cases, “the department said.

The Police Department added, “The USCP agrees that a standalone CCU would be valuable. However, to fully implement this recommendation, the department would need additional resources for new hires, training and vehicles, as well as approval from Congressional stakeholders.”

Subscribe to CNBC Pro for the TV livestream, deep insights and analysis of how to invest during the next president’s term.

Categories
Politics

Blinken, in Ukraine, Warns of Twin Threats: Russia and Corruption

Kiev, Ukraine – Foreign Minister Antony J. Blinken told the Ukrainian President on Thursday that the United States strongly supported his country’s sovereignty against Russia’s military aggression, but also warned that the embattled country was threatened by “internal forces”, including powerful oligarchs who thrive on corruption.

Mr Blinken also said that despite Russia’s recently announced plans to withdraw many of the 100,000 troops it raised in alarming violence on the border with Ukraine this spring, a clear military threat remained.

“Russia has withdrawn some forces, but significant forces remain on the Ukrainian border,” noted Blinken. “And so, on a fairly short-term basis, Russia has the ability to take aggressive action if it so wishes.” Mr Blinken added that the United States “was watching this very, very closely”.

Mr Blinken spoke at a joint press conference with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who thanked the first high-ranking Biden official to visit Kiev since President Donald J. Trump left office. The former president embroiled Mr Zelensky in a global scandal that the Ukrainian leader clearly hopes to forget.

When asked if the efforts of Mr. Trump’s personal attorney Rudolph Giuliani in 2019 had “thrown back” efforts to drive corruption out of Ukraine’s political system, Mr. Zelensky boasted of his reform record, saying he hoped it would the matter was closed.

“Let’s not talk about the past,” he said. “Let us let the past be the past and discuss the future.”

This can be difficult given an active FBI investigation into Mr. Giuliani that culminated in a robbery of his home and office last week. Federal agents reportedly sought evidence of his role in removing the American ambassador to Ukraine in May 2019, allegedly at the behest of Mr Giuliani’s Ukrainian staff.

For his part, Mr Blinken maneuvered a question with Mr Giuliani, but reminded Mr Zelensky – whose reform report has received mixed reviews – that “the effective fight against corruption is one of the most important issues for the Ukrainian people and for their lives is of vital importance improve. “

“There are strong interests against reforms, against the fight against corruption,” said Blinken. “This includes external forces like Russia, but also internal forces like oligarchs and other powerful people who are pursuing their own narrow interests.”

As Ukraine struggles to remove corruption from its political system, fueled in part by a Kremlin attempting to destabilize its pro-Washington government, the country fights off a Moscow-backed, pro-Russian separatist insurgency in the east of the country Country. According to the United Nations, the fighting in the region has claimed more than 13,000 lives.

To sustain this conflict and weather any new offensive by Russia, Ukrainian officials are keen to get more military support and potential arms sales from Washington, which is currently sending Ukraine more than $ 400 million in military aid annually. Mr Blinken said that the Biden administration was working “very actively” on the issue but was not offering any further details.

But Mr Blinken underscored his concern about Ukraine’s military plight with a morning visit to an outdoor memorial to soldiers who died in the conflict in the east. Known as the Wall of National Remembrance, the memorial features hundreds of photographs of the fallen strolling along an outer wall of St. Michael, a 12th-century monastery and church.

In driving rain, Mr. Blinken, accompanied by high-ranking figures from the Orthodox Church of Ukraine and the country’s foreign minister, knelt down to lay flowers at the foot of the wall.

Mr. Blinken later told Mr. Zelensky that the pictures of the fallen had touched him personally.

“We were able to pay tribute to those who lost their lives defending Ukrainian democracy,” he said. “And it’s very, very moving to be on the wall.”

“You see every one of them in these pictures – and you think of the mothers and fathers, the sisters and brothers, the children who lost loved ones in defending Ukraine, and it’s very, very powerful,” added he added.

In September 2019, a CIA whistleblower announced that in a phone call with Mr. Zelensky in June 2019, Mr. Trump had pressured him to announce an investigation into Mr. Biden, then a Democratic presidential candidate, and Mr. Biden’s son Hunter. who worked for a Ukrainian energy company. Mr Trump withheld U.S. military aid to Ukraine when he pressed his request. The episode led to Mr. Trump’s first impeachment trial and a painfully uncomfortable experience for Mr. Zelensky.

In a remark to U.S. Embassy staff during a virtual visit with them, Mr Blinken alluded to the chaos of events that led to Mr Trump’s impeachment – including the politicized removal of American Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch – created at the State Department .

“I know the last few years have been particularly difficult,” he said. “Even before Covid, Ukraine – and this mission – got embroiled in affairs, and that shouldn’t have been the case. And one thing that is very important is that politics stop at the C Street door, and it is now. ”

After his meetings with Ukrainian officials, Mr. Blinken held a round table on corruption and reform, which was attended mainly by representatives of civil society who were “at the forefront” in a second struggle for democracy in Ukraine.

During the joint appearance with Mr. Blinken, the Ukrainian guide said he hoped that Mr. Biden himself could visit Ukraine soon. Mr Blinken cited travel restrictions due to the coronavirus, but said the American President “will welcome the opportunity at the right time”.

Mr. Blinken was joined by a longtime ally of the Ukrainians, Victoria Nuland, the newly confirmed Secretary of the Foreign Ministry for Political Affairs. Ms. Nuland, a career foreign service official and senior State Department official in the Obama administration, left the administration in early 2017 but was selected as the number 3 official in the department that year.

Ms. Nuland is known in Kiev – and was insulted in the Kremlin – for distributing food in 2013 on the Independence Square of the Ukrainian capital, known as the Maidan, in the prelude to the overthrow of the Russian Viktor F. Yanukovych. supported the President of Ukraine at the time. It was this revolution in March 2014 and Putin’s fears that the former Soviet republic could be brought closer into harmony with the West that sparked Putin’s annexation of the Ukrainian Crimean peninsula and his instigation of an uprising in eastern Ukraine.

Your presence was clearly appreciated. At the beginning of a morning meeting with Mr. Blinken, Foreign Minister Dmytro Kubela congratulated Ms. Nuland on her appointment. He laughed when he remarked that one of the few major events on the Maidan that he had missed was “your cookies,” even though she said they were actually sandwiches she passed around, not cookies.

In Russia, Ms. Nuland is seen very differently: An article in July 2020 on the website of the Kremlin-funded RT network called her the “Maidan midwife” and characterized her Hawkish political views on Russia as “stupid, delusional and dangerous”.

Categories
Health

Bioterrorism, local weather change are subsequent large threats after Covid

Bill Gates at the Munich Security Conference on February 17, 2017 in Munich.

Michael Gottschalk | Getty

Billionaire philanthropist Bill Gates warned for years that a deadly pandemic could occur. Now he is creating the threat of bio-terrorism and climate change.

Gates appeared on Derek Muller’s YouTube channel Veritasium last week, asking what the next problem for humanity was.

“One is climate change. Every year this would be an even higher death toll than this pandemic,” said the Microsoft co-founder. “In the context of pandemics, people don’t like to talk much about what bioterrorism is, that someone who wants to cause harm could develop a virus. That means the chance of encountering it is more than just like naturally caused epidemics the actual. “

Years before the coronavirus hit the globe, Gates warned that governments were not prepared for a pandemic.

“The world as a whole is not prepared for epidemics, and we’ve had some flu scares that made us do some minor things, but not enough,” he said in a 2014 interview. “If this thing had been twice as permeable “We’d be in big trouble, and there are agents who have a real chance of coming in the next few decades who are far more porous than this. What can you stop?” Form of SARS shows up? “

In a 2015 TED talk titled “The Next Outbreak? We’re Not Ready,” Gates said an infectious virus poses a greater risk to humanity than nuclear war.

In his interview with Müller, Gates said there will be more pandemics. In the future, however, governments could increase their willingness to reduce the death toll.

According to data from Johns Hopkins University, more than 107.44 million coronavirus cases were recorded worldwide as of Thursday morning, with at least 2.35 million people dying

“The number of deaths with the right system should be a tenth of what we see here,” said Gates.

You can find the full interview here.

Categories
Business

Level72 founder Steve Cohen leaves Twitter after household receives threats

Steven A. Cohen

Scott Eells | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Steve Cohen, the founder of Point72 hedge fund and owner of the New York Mets, turned off his Twitter account after his family received threats in the GameStop trading frenzy this week.

“I really enjoyed the back and forth with Mets fans on Twitter, which was unfortunately overtaken this week by misinformation unrelated to the Mets that resulted in our family receiving personal threats,” Cohen said in a statement on Saturday.

“So I’m taking a break for the time being. We have other options to listen to your suggestions and keep advocating,” he said.

Cohen’s hedge fund, which manages nearly $ 19 billion in assets, lost nearly 15% this year after small investors drove shares of video game retailer GameStop, a source familiar with the matter told the New York Times.

The losses at Point72 are mainly due to the company’s investment in the hedge fund Melvin Capital, which bet against GameStop and had to receive emergency money of nearly $ 3 billion from two outside investors, including Point72.

Cohen, who bought the Mets for about $ 2.5 billion in November, was faced with questions on Twitter about how Melvin’s losses would affect the baseball team.

Cohen also had a back-and-forth with Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy on Twitter Thursday after Portnoy accused Cohen of being involved in controversial trade restrictions in GameStop for apps like Robinhood.

Categories
Politics

Thousands and thousands Meant for Public Well being Threats Had been Diverted Elsewhere, Watchdog Says

WASHINGTON – A federal guard has determined that the biomedical advanced research and development agency, which attracted national attention last year when the Trump administration fired its director, has been using as a “slush fund” to cover expenses for 10 years unrelated to its funding, becomes a core task of combating health threats such as Ebola, Zika and the coronavirus.

The 223-page report, issued Wednesday by the Office of Special Counsel, found the Department of Health and Human Services spent millions of taxpayers’ money earmarked for BARDA to fund vaccine research and pandemic preparedness into other government activities diverted and failed to inform Congress – a possible violation of federal law.

Unrelated activities included removal of office furniture, administrative expenses, news subscriptions, legal services, and the salaries of other department employees. According to the investigators, the diversion of funds was so widespread that the employees had a name for it: the “Bank of BARDA”.

The report focuses on the actions of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, the official in the Department of Health who oversees and is responsible for the budget of BARDA. The assistant secretary is responsible for leading the federal response to pandemic threats such as the novel coronavirus. Its youngest resident was Dr. Robert Kadlec; President Biden has not named a successor.

“I am deeply concerned about the apparent misuse of millions of dollars in funds by ASPR dedicated to public health emergencies as our country is currently facing the Covid-19 pandemic,” wrote Henry J. Kerner, the special adviser, in a letter to Mr. Biden, using the acronym for the assistant secretary for preparedness and response.

“Equally worrying,” added Kerner, “is how widespread and well-known this practice has appeared to be for nearly a decade.”

The report does not specifically state how much money has been misused. But around $ 25 million was taken from BARDA programs and made available to the assistant secretary’s office only in fiscal 2019. For fiscal years 2007 through 2016, the assistant secretary reported no administrative expenses of $ 517.8 million.

It is also suggested that a Senator, Richard M. Burr, Republican of North Carolina, who drafted the legislation that created BARDA and is believed to be its supporter in Congress, has been embroiled in internal funding disputes. The whistleblower informed the investigators that at the behest of Mr Burr and his “pet project”, a “restrictive wording” had been added to the 2016 budget – an obvious reference to BARDA.

A spokesman for the senator had no comment.

BARDA was launched in 2006 by the Congress. Its mission is to fund novel research into vaccines, therapeutics, diagnostics, and other “medical countermeasures” to combat natural and biological defense threats. It was relatively dark until Dr. Kadlec in April his director, Dr. Rick Bright, dismissed.

Dr. Bright said at the time that he was removed from his post and reassigned to a closer job at the National Institutes of Health after pushing for a rigorous review of hydroxychloroquine, an antimalarial drug that President Donald J. Trump adopted as a coronavirus treatment The government had “put politics and cronyism before science”.

The new Washington

Updated

Jan. 28, 2021, 8:48 ET

Days later, he filed a whistleblower complaint with the Office of Special Counsel, an independent federal surveillance agency. He has since left the federal government and most recently advised Mr Biden about the coronavirus during the transition.

However, the report released on Wednesday is not an answer to Dr. Bright. Rather, it covers both the Obama and Trump administrations and emerged from an investigation into a complaint made by an unnamed whistleblower in 2018, the allegations of which were primarily Dr. Kadlec’s predecessor Dr. Nicole Lurie concerned. The whistleblower accused Dr. Lurie, “reported false information to Congress” in her monthly reports to lawyers.

Both Dr. Kadlec and Dr. Lurie have denied wrongdoing. In a brief interview on Wednesday, Dr. Lurie, she was not interviewed for the investigation. The results were previously reported by the Washington Post.

“We left the country stronger than we found it, including a pandemic playbook,” said Dr. Lurie about her time as head of the agency. “All spending was routinely made and approved through multiple layers of strict budget processes. No expenditure was made unilaterally. “

In a statement, Mr. Kerner urged Congress and the Department of Health “to take immediate action to ensure that public health emergency funding can no longer be used as a slush fund for unrelated expenses.”

The Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement it would review how the deputy secretary allocated money in fiscal 2015-2019 to see if any law had been broken.

A lawyer for Dr. Bright, Debra S. Katz, described the results as “outrage”. While the special adviser said last spring that there were “reasonable grounds” to believe that the removal of Dr. Bright was seeking repayment and was demanding his reinstatement, Ms. Katz said the investigation into his complaint is slow because the Trump administration has not cooperated. This complaint focused on Dr. Kadlec.

“These people used BARDA as their own piggy bank – both to manage contracts with their pals and to carry out any specific projects they wanted to detriment the public health and safety of Americans,” she said.