Categories
Health

Theranos is historical past, however massive blood testing breakthroughs are coming

Medical researchers say within a few years major breakthroughs in blood testing technology that use immune system response and genetic analysis to identify disease quickly and cost-effectively will be on the market.

picture alliance | picture alliance | Getty Images

One morning last May, Tayah Fernandes’s mother Shannon realized her four-year-old daughter was seriously unwell, and rushed her to the nearest ER in the English city of Manchester. The coronavirus had crashed onto Britain’s shores weeks earlier, and emergency doctors were initially uncertain how best to treat Tayah’s constellation of symptoms, which included stomach pains and a bright red rash.

They gave her antibiotics for a suspected bacterial infection, but her condition only worsened, her fever spiking. For her parents, for any parents, this was the ultimate medical nightmare; doctors in the dark for days over the cause of their daughter’s illness.

Eventually, after further blood tests, physicians decided Tayah was suffering from an unusual inflammatory syndrome that pediatric infectious disease specialists had only just started to see, but suspected had links to Sars-COV-2.

Young patients across the U.K. and U.S. were arriving in intensive care units with symptoms similar to another disease doctors already recognized, called Kawasaki. But they had no guarantee that the same course of treatment — injecting a solution of donors’ antibodies into the bloodstream — would prove successful.

In Tayah’s case the antibodies solution, known as immunoglobulin, worked, to her parents’ relief. But at around that same time last May a team of researchers at Imperial College, London confirmed through complex analyses of blood samples, taken from patients like Tayah, that this was indeed a new disease, distinct from Kawasaki.

Hunting inside immune system response to bacteria, virus

A related breakthrough in that same laboratory, focused specifically on the way individual genes behave, could have seismic implications for a multi-billion dollar diagnostics sector that has received unprecedented attention from patients, regulators and the business world over the course of this pandemic.

A new method for identifying a specific illness from blood samples relies on the correlation between the activity in small set of genes, which represents the immune response, and specific pathogens that cause a specific disease — just as the poliovirus causes polio, the coronavirus (SARS-COV-2, a pathogen) causes Covid-19. Scientists believe that by studying a small number of genes, they can quickly discern which pathogen is in a patient’s system, what disease they have, and so how best to treat them. 

Companies from small research university spin-offs to industry giants like Abbott Laboratories and Danaher’s Cepheid are looking to build on two decades of research into the way our own immune systems naturally respond to foreign substances in our bodies, including pathogens like bacteria or viruses. A current technology like Cepheid’s GeneXpert technology is able to distinguish between the different RNA of various viruses, such as SARS-COV-2, or a particular influenza strain, but experts say it’s become increasingly clear that our body’s immune systems can be faster, more accurate detection systems. 

Historically, doctors have had to rely on a patient’s case history and symptoms to narrow down the cause of an illness and develop a treatment plan. More recently, laboratory inspections at the molecular level such as the Cepheid technology have allowed clinicians to identify specific pathogens in nasal mucus, throat swabs or blood samples that might have caused an illness. But hunting for bacteria or a virus in this way can be time-consuming, costly and sometimes simply ineffective. The specific RNA signature of a virus can be hard to detect.

Abbott and Cepheid did not respond to requests for comment.

More from CNBC’s Healthy Returns

The team at Imperial College, London, working separately but at the same time as several counterparts around the world, are now convinced that future diagnoses can soon be conducted using table-top tests that will take just a matter of minutes.

These tests would not explicitly screen for a specific pathogen, but instead, allow scientists and medical professionals to simply watch how specific genes in the body are behaving as an indication of how an immune system is already responding to a pathogen that may not be easily otherwise detectable. 

Imperial College professor Mike Levin currently leads an ongoing European Union-funded study focused on this potential, called “Diamonds.” In recent years he and other scientists have shown how the observed activity in a small number of our genes can work as a kind of shorthand for our body’s immune response to a pathogen. If a handful of specific genes out of thousands in a blood sample are seen to be activated — or the opposite, inhibited — it can indicate that a person is preparing to fight off a specific pathogen.

We think this is a completely revolutionary way of doing medical diagnosis.

Imperial College professor Mike Levin

Levin and colleagues already have a proof of concept for this diagnostic approach after studies involving thousands of patients with fever caused by tuberculosis, and hundreds of Kawasaki patients. And his Imperial College team’s work with the “Diamonds” study are starting to bear fruit and could help identify the distinct immunological markers of illnesses like the coronavirus-linked multi-system inflammatory syndrome in children like Tayah Fernandes, now commonly known as MIS-C. 

When Covid-19 turned up in multiple locations, with MIS-C in its wake, it presented Levin and his researchers with an unprecedented opportunity to test this technique on an entirely new disease.

In the future, these tests — by relying on huge amounts of data and machine learning — should be able to produce multi-class rather than just binary results. This means they could confirm not only if a pathogen is bacterial or viral, or whether someone has a specific disease or not, but could distinguish which one of a multitude of illnesses is afflicting their patient.

In short, Levin expects that by examining the behavior of a relatively small number of genes, clinicians will be able to assign patients to all the major disease classes within an hour.

“We think this is a completely revolutionary way of doing medical diagnosis,” Levin said. He expects the research will provide the basis for new technology, but has no financial interest in any business related to it. 

Rather than what he calls the “stepwise process” of first eliminating bacterial infections, treating for the most common conditions, and then doing more investigation, “this idea is the very first blood test can tell you, has the patient got an infection or not an infection, and what group of infection that is, right down to the individual pathogens.”

Purvesh Khatri, an associate professor at the Stanford Institute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection and Department of Medicine, says our immune systems have been evolving for millennia to combat pathogens, and so it may prove more effective, and efficient, to examine the response of our bodies.

“We didn’t have a technology, until now, that could measure a set of genes in a rapid point of care way,” he said. “But in the last couple of years, there have been enough technologies available that now allow us to measure a few genes in a rapid multiplex point of care assay way.”

While neither the FDA nor any European regulators have approved these kinds of gene-based pathogen detection systems, Khatri, who is helping launch a related commercial venture, says they’re coming soon. “In the next year or two, there will be several that will be available on the market.”

Stay connected with Healthy Returns

For a front row seat at CNBC Events, you can hear directly from the visionary executives, innovators, leaders and influencers taking the stage in “The Keynote Podcast.” Listen now, however you get your podcasts.

For more exclusive insights from our reporters and speakers, sign up for our Healthy Returns newsletter to get the latest delivered straight to your inbox weekly.

Categories
Health

Theranos blood take a look at accuracy at coronary heart of Elizabeth Holmes legal case

Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes will attend the US government fraud court hearing against her on May 5, 2021.

CNBC

Former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes promised a technological breakthrough, but it really was a house of cards, prosecutors said during a trial Wednesday.

“Miss Holmes went out, told the world, and told investors, we have tests with the highest accuracy rate,” said US assistant attorney Robert Leach, adding that her expert’s testimony “lies.”

The argument was in response to efforts by the defense, Dr. Stephen Master, an associate professor of pathology and laboratory in the University of Pennsylvania Medical School, from taking a stand. In 2013, after interviewing Holmes at a conference, Master said that her claims about Theranos’ miniLab technology “fell far short of previous claims”.

Holmes’ defenders argued that the master was used as a “parrot” by the government and that his conclusions about certain Theranos blood tests were “based on emails and customer complaints,” not practical experience.

Wednesday’s hearing was the second day of the argument about what evidence can be admitted and excluded from Holmes’ criminal fraud trial, which begins August 31st.

Prosecutors, among other things, alleged that Holmes was presenting an inappropriate defense in good faith.

“Efforts to return money to victims cannot undo the fraud once it is committed,” said John Bostick, another US assistant attorney.

The judge is expected to rule on critical motions, including whether to provide evidence of Holmes’ assets and expenses, private text exchanges and regulatory reports by the end of the week.

The hearing came when a former Theranos executive who had been close to Holmes in the company’s final days told CNBC that management was discussing Holmes’ resignation as CEO on several occasions. For Holmes, however, “that was a non-runner”.

“If she had resigned, I think she would have saved herself a lot of legal danger,” said the former Theranos manager, who asked not to be named. “Everyone who knows Elizabeth knows that she saw herself as a company, and I don’t think she can see the company going on without her.”

Holmes left Stanford at 19 to start Theranos. By the time the company collapsed in 2018, she had a six-figure salary and a multi-billion dollar stake in the blood testing startup.

However, an investigation by the Wall Street Journal found that the technology didn’t work as Holmes claimed it did. Now she faces a dozen fraud charges for falsely claiming that Theranos technology can perform dozens of blood tests on a drop or two of blood. She pleaded not guilty.

Despite the chaos in the final months of her reign, Holmes believed Theranos could still be saved.

Holmes achieved a partial victory this week when the judge ruled that defenders can refer to Silicon Valley’s hype culture to explain why Holmes exaggerated the technology behind Theranos.

Categories
Health

Elizabeth Holmes denies destroying proof in Theranos case

Elizabeth Holmes, founder and former executive director of Theranos, arrives for a hearing in the U.S. District Court in the Federal Building of Robert F. Peckham in San Jose, California on Monday, November 4, 2019.

Yichuan Cao | NurPhoto | Getty Images

The mystery of what happened to critical evidence proving Theranos’ blood testing technology was not working deepened when Elizabeth Holmes accused the government of what she calls an “investigative failure”.

In a file filed late Tuesday, Holmes lawyers shot back prosecutors to rule out evidence of so-called test results, saying they were to blame for losing a database called the Laboratory Information System (LIS) that contained three years of accuracy and failure rates of Theranos tests.

“Rather than accepting responsibility for this investigation failure and the resulting gaps in evidence in their case, the government has taken a different path,” write Holmes’ attorneys, adding, “The government has assumed that the loss of LIS data reflects the woman . Holmes’ alleged guilt, although it had nothing to do with it. “

“The reason the government lacks this evidence is because prosecutors sat on their hands for years before attempting to acquire them and then sat on their hands again after acquiring them. It is entirely their fault,” the lawyers write from Holmes.

“The reason the government built their case on this fluctuating house of cards of irrelevant evidence is because they lost – or, worse, didn’t want to analyze – the actual evidence of the test results in this case,” argued Holmes’ attorneys.

However, prosecutors claim that Theranos executives destroyed the LIS system, which proved their blood test product was inaccurate.

In a filing last month, the government said that three months after a federal grand jury issued a subpoena for a copy of the database in August 2018, “the LIS was destroyed”. They wrote that “the government was never given the full records in the LIS, nor were they given the tools available in the database to search for evidence as critical as any Theranos blood test with validation errors. The Data disappeared “”

Prosecutors say the failure rate in one of these tests was 51.3%, adding that Theranos’ test results “were so inaccurate that it was essentially a toss of a coin whether the patient got the correct result. The data was devastating.” You want to invite 11 patients and 11 physicians to testify about the accuracy and reliability issues.

Holmes says there is a certain amount of expected errors in all laboratory tests: “Just as the fact of a heart attack does not prove what caused the heart attack, the fact of a wrong blood test does not prove what caused the error.”

Prosecutors point to internal emails that prove Theranos and his lawyer tried to cover up the grand jury’s test results in the database. Theranos provided backup copies of the database for investigators to put together. However, prosecutors claim that the backup required a password that Theranos executives could not remember.

Once a Silicon Valley darling, Theranos attracted the who’s who of venture capitalists and a $ 9 billion private valuation before closing in 2018.

Holmes and her co-defendant Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani each face a dozen fraud charges related to deceiving investors, patients and doctors about Theranos technology.

Holmes will face prosecutors next month for believing that evidence should not be presented to a jury that will determine her fate.

The judge’s verdicts will set the stage for her long-awaited trial, due to begin in July.

Categories
Business

Prosecutors allege Theranos fraud fueled Elizabeth Holmes’ way of life

Billionaire Elizabeth Holmes, founder and CEO of Theranos Inc., and Christian Holmes come to a state dinner hosted by US President Barack Obama and US First Lady Michelle Obama in honor of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at the White House in Washington, DC, USA, on Tuesday April 28th, 2015.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Prosecutors paint a picture of what the public saw: a billionaire entrepreneur who donned designer labels with her black turtlenecks and rubbed shoulders with world leaders.

But like the Hall of Mirrors at Carnival, everything was just an illusion, according to the government.

Elizabeth Holmes intended to use Theranos “as an instrument to improve her personal situation,” the prosecutor wrote in a request to the court on Friday evening.

“The causal link between the defendant’s fraud and the benefits in question is strong,” the government said.

Holmes and her COO, Ramesh “Sunny” Balwani, face a dozen fraud charges each. If convicted, they can spend up to 20 years in prison.

As Theranos CEO, prosecutors said Holmes led an extravagant lifestyle that included “traveling by private jets, staying at luxury hotels and having access to multiple assistants.”

“Although the defendant’s assistant was an employee of the company, she did a variety of non-business tasks for the defendant, including shopping for personal clothing and jewelry, decorating homes, buying groceries and groceries, and other items,” said the government in one file.

The government’s motion was in response to efforts by Holmes’ attorneys to prevent the jury from finding out details about their jet setting lifestyle.

The government intends to produce evidence that the alleged fraud at Theranos is directly related to the money and fame Holmes has gained as the CEO of Theranos.

Prosecutors wrote that Holmes was “the object of admiration in the local and national business community and has appeared in numerous publications and on television. She has been associated with influential figures such as politicians and business leaders. The evidence in the trial will show these benefits for.” mattered to the defendants, who watched the daily news closely to maintain their image. “

Holmes was a Silicon Valley favorite, attracting more than $ 700 million in investor money.

“In addition to the specific benefits she received from her fraud, she has also benefited from a great deal of positive attention from the media, business leaders and dignitaries,” the prosecutor wrote.

The motion comes the same night that Holmes’ lawyers claim their failed firm is no different from any other Silicon Valley start-up trying to make a name for itself.

The government “is calling for an order preventing the defense from focusing on the Silicon Valley start-up culture, arguing that founders in this area often use exaggeration and dramatic promises to get the attention they need for their businesses generate and attract capital, “the court said of Holmes lawyers.

Her lawyers argue that evidence related to the culture of Silicon Valley startups may be relevant to the case: “For example, the government intends to produce evidence of certain practices that the government claims they have in Theranos A culture of ‘secrecy’ created to show that Ms. Holmes was hiding alleged fraud. “

“While Ms. Holmes has tried to rule out such evidence, Ms. Holmes, if admitted, could certainly provide evidence that other Silicon Valley startups have used similar practices and that people at Theranos were aware of these practices.”

Holmes will face their fate in July. When she appeared on Zoom, she sometimes looked grumpy, a sharp contrast to the image she had once projected onto the world.

Categories
Health

California’s Covid surge forces trial delay of Theranos Elizabeth Holmes

Elizabeth Holmes, founder and former executive director of Theranos, arrives for a hearing in the U.S. District Court in the Federal Building of Robert F. Peckham in San Jose, California on Monday, November 4, 2019.

Yichuan Cao | NurPhoto | Getty Images

A surge in coronavirus cases in California has resulted in a four-month delay in criminal proceedings against Elizabeth Holmes, the former CEO and founder of the competitive health tech company Theranos.

In an order late Friday evening, US District Judge Edward Davila set a new hearing for the case for July 13, 2021.

“The court was vigilant to keep abreast of the nation and state impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as daily life on San Francisco Bay,” the tripartite ruling reads. “Unfortunately, the court finds that the impact on our lives is grave. California is in the midst of an unprecedented increase in cases and hospitalizations.”

The judge found that California had more than 1.76 million confirmed cases of Covid-19 and 22,160 deaths as of Friday. He also indicated that the Santa Clara County hospitals where the trial would take place are nearing maximum capacity.

Davila said these terms would “affect the jury and public confidence in a personal process that is expected to take several months”.

The move comes two weeks after the judge established a reconfigured courtroom, face mask requirements for study participants, and air filtration systems to move Holmes’ trial forward.

Prosecutors say they have ample evidence that Holmes ran a multi-million dollar program to scam investors, doctors and patients about the accuracy of Theranos’ blood testing technology.

Holmes, once hailed as the next Steve Jobs, pleaded guilty to a dozen criminal offenses – expecting 20 years in prison if convicted.

“The court recognizes that continuation of the trial will cause great inconvenience to victims who wish to spend their day in court, as well as to the defendant who wants a speedy defense against the charges,” he said.

The verdict came in the wake of Holmes’ struggle to prevent prosecutors from using their personal communications with their former lawyer, David Boies, while in Theranos.