Categories
Politics

Republican Rep. Ron Wright of Texas is first sitting member of Congress to die of Covid

Elected Ron Wright, R-Texas Rep. Participates in a welcome meeting for new members at the Capitol Visitor Center on November 15, 2018.

Tom Williams | CQ Appeal, Inc. | Getty Images

Texas Republican MP Ron Wright died weeks after contracting Covid-19, his office said Monday. He was 67 years old.

Wright, who took office in 2019, died on Sunday. He had undergone treatment for lung cancer after it was diagnosed in 2018.

He and his wife Susan were hospitalized in Dallas for two weeks before the Congressman died fighting the disease. The congressman, whose Arlington district was a part, announced that he tested positive for Covid-19 on Jan. 21.

“As friends, family and many of his constituents will know, Ron kept his quick wit and optimism to the end,” said Wright’s office. “Despite years of painful, sometimes debilitating cancer treatment, Ron never lacked the desire to get up and go to work, motivate those around him, or give fatherly advice.”

Wright is the first seated member of Congress to die after contracting Covid. Luke Letlow, a Louisiana Republican who was elected to the House of Representatives in November, died of complications from Covid-19 a month later before taking office.

According to GovTrack, at least 71 officials and senators have been diagnosed with Covid. Nationwide, more than 27 million people have contracted the disease and killed more than 463,000 Americans.

Texas will eventually hold a special election to elect Wright’s successor in the Texas 6th Ward, which is in Tarrant County outside of Dallas.

Wright’s death means Democrats now have an 11-seat advantage in the house. There are four vacancies in the 435-person home, including Letlow’s 5th Ward in Louisiana.

Wright’s final vote was against the charges against former President Donald Trump for provoking the January 6 uprising in the U.S. Capitol, the House employee said. He also voted to object to the election count in Pennsylvania and Arizona last month.

Categories
Health

Texas, Connecticut well being officers determine states’ first instances of latest Covid pressure present in UK

Medical staff examine a patient with coronavirus in the COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) at the United Memorial Medical Center in Houston, Texas on November 16, 2020.

Go Nakamura | Getty Images

Public health officials in Texas announced Thursday that they had identified the state’s first case for a new, more contagious variant of the coronavirus that was originally discovered in the United Kingdom.

The patient, a man between 30 and 40 years of age with no travel history, was discovered in Harris County, home of Houston, the county health department said in a statement. The man was isolated and in stable condition, and local infectious disease experts are following all of his contacts to find and monitor other people he may have exposed to the virus.

It’s likely the variant is already floating around in Texas as the man had no history, said Dr. John Hellerstedt, the Texas Department of Health commissioner, in a statement. He added that genetic variations in viruses “are the norm,” and it’s not surprising that the variant was discovered in Texas, given how quickly it spreads.

“This should get us all to double our commitment to the infection prevention methods we know: masks when you are around people you don’t live with, social distancing, and personal and environmental hygiene,” Hellerstedt said.

Shortly after Texas officials announced their first case, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont said in a tweet that his state had identified two Covid-19 cases with the new variant B.1.1.7 in people aged 15-25 . Both patients had an out-of-state travel history – one to Ireland and the other to New York, Lamont said.

“As we said last week, given the speed of this new strain of virus and its identification in several states across the country, we assumed it was already in our state and that information confirms that fact this morning,” the governor said in a tweet .

The strain, which has also been found in California, Georgia, New York, Florida, and Colorado, is believed to be communicable but doesn’t appear to make people sicker or increase the risk of death from Covid-19, experts have said. Earlier Thursday, Pennsylvania health officials said they had identified their state’s first case with the new variant.

Harris County judge Lina Hidalgo, the county’s most elected official, said in a tweet Thursday that the discovery of the variant in the region was “worrying” given its already rapid spread.

As of Thursday, the district was still in its most serious threat level, “Level 1”. This means that testing and contact tracing efforts are strained and outbreaks are “present or worsening” according to the county’s website.

When the county is at this level, residents are advised to only leave their homes for essential purposes and to minimize contact with other people whenever possible.

Officials at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have stated that current vaccines should work against the new variant, although additional hospitalizations could occur if allowed to spread uncontrollably. Federal health officials are also on the lookout for a second separate new strain, first identified in South Africa.

The CDC does not yet know how widespread the new variant B.1.1.7 is in the USA. The agency now requires all passengers traveling from the UK to the US to provide evidence of a negative Covid-19 test before boarding, which was carried out no later than three days before their departure.

– CNBC’s Will Feuer contributed to this report.

Categories
Politics

Kevin McCarthy backs Supreme Court docket bid from Texas to overturn Biden wins

Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Chairman of the U.S. Minority Group, speaks during a press conference with fellow U.S. Capitol Republicans on December 10, 2020 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington.

Erin Scott | Reuters

Kevin McCarthy, minority chairman of the House of Representatives, R-Calif., Along with 125 other Republican Congressmen, supported the Texas Supreme Court’s longstanding lawsuit against Joe Biden’s proposed presidential victory on Friday.

McCarthy, the senior Republican in the House of Representatives and a close ally of President Donald Trump, was included in a letter from the “Friend of the Court,” presided over by Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., Urging the Supreme Court to To review the case filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton earlier this week.

Paxton’s case accused Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin – four major swing states where Biden defeated Trump – of attesting “illegal election results”. Texas is asking the Supreme Court to state that the electoral college votes cast by voters in these four swing states “cannot be counted”.

The majority vote in the House’s GOP conference behind the Supreme Court offer to effectively reverse the outcome of the 2020 election came after all 50 states and Washington, DC confirmed their election results. Biden is expected to win 306 votes, compared to 232 for Trump.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., In a damning letter from her dear colleague, accused the Republicans of supporting the case of “electoral subversion that threatens our democracy”.

“This lawsuit is an act of GOP desperation that violates the principles enshrined in our American democracy,” wrote Pelosi.

“As members of Congress, we take a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution,” her letter said. “The Republicans are undermining the Constitution through their ruthless and fruitless assault on our democracy, which threatens to seriously undermine public confidence in our most sacred democratic institutions and slow our progress on the urgent challenges ahead.”

The Supreme Court has given no indication that it will hear the case and electoral law experts say the judges are highly unlikely to take him up. The unprecedented motion by one state to invalidate other states’ votes in a presidential election has never been granted.

Even so, the lawsuit was hyped up by Trump, who falsely claims he won re-election while refusing to admit Biden. Trump asked Wednesday to intervene in Paxton’s case.

Numerous other states where Trump won the referendum have also indicated their support for Paxton’s lawsuit, as have dozens of seated Republican members of the House – a group that McCarthy is now a part of.

Though news outlets scheduled the election for Biden weeks earlier and had less than a week for voters in their respective states to cast their votes, many Republicans were reluctant to acknowledge that Biden had won the election.

McCarthy was asked directly on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” Thursday whether he would accept Biden’s win and refused to give a yes-or-no answer.

“Look, voters have to go through this and get this out,” McCarthy said in his response. “The President must ensure that every legal vote is counted, every recount is carried out and every complaint is made [is being] heard in court. Once that’s done I think the election will be over and the voters will make their choice. “

McCarthy was not included in an earlier amicus letter filed in court on Thursday, also headed by Johnson and signed by 106 members of the Republican House.

Johnson said on Twitter that the 20 additional Republicans added to his last letter to the court had previously been left out because of a “typographical error”.

– CNBC’s Jacob Pramuk contributed to this report.

Categories
Politics

Supreme Court docket Rejects Texas Lawsuit Difficult Biden’s Victory

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton responded with his own letter on Friday morning. “Whatever Pennsylvania’s definition of turmoil,” he wrote, “moving this court to heal grave threats to Texas Senate suffrage and the suffrage of its citizens in presidential elections affirms the Constitution, which is the opposite of turmoil . ” ”

Allegations that the election was tainted by widespread fraud have been rebutted by Mr Trump’s own Attorney General William P. Barr, who said this month the Justice Department had not uncovered election fraud “on a scale that could have changed the election. “

Some 20 Democratic-led states, in a brief endorsement of the four battlefield states, urged the Supreme Court to “reject Texas’s last-minute attempt to discard the results of a popular vote that is safely monitored and certified by its sister states. ”

Georgia, which won Mr Biden by less than 12,000 votes out of nearly five million votes cast, said in his letter that it had handled his election with integrity and care. “In this election cycle,” the letter said, “Georgia has done what the constitution was empowered to do: it implemented electoral processes, managed the election in the face of the logistical challenges posed by Covid-19, and confirmed and confirmed the election.” Results – over and over again. Even so, Texas sued Georgia. “

Even ahead of Election Day, Mr Trump and his Republican allies filed nearly five dozen lawsuits against the treatment, casting and counting of votes in courts in at least eight different states.

They generally lost these cases and often drew blistering reproaches from judges who heard them. Along the way, Mr Trump has not nearly overturned election results in a single state, let alone the minimum of three he would need to claim Mr Biden’s victory.

The first set of measures preceded the elections and was aimed at ending or rolling back the voting measures that states across the country had been taking to deal with the coronavirus crisis. In Texas, for example, Republicans were prosecuting a failed attempt in federal court to stop the drive-through vote in Harris County, home of Houston. A similar move was taken in Pennsylvania to prevent the state from accepting postal ballot papers received after election day.

Categories
Business

Gov. Greg Abbott on Oracle, corporations transferring headquarters to Texas

Texas governor Greg Abbott told CNBC on Friday that the number of companies relocating their headquarters to the Lone Star State has accelerated in part due to the coronavirus pandemic.

The Republican governor’s comments came shortly after it was reported that software giant Oracle was moving its corporate headquarters from Redwood City, California, in Silicon Valley, to Austin, Texas. Hewlett Packard Enterprise announced earlier this month that it is moving its headquarters from San Jose, California to Houston. Real estate giant CBRE officially relocated its headquarters from Los Angeles to Dallas in early fall.

“I’ve been on the phone with CEOs across the country weekly, and it’s not just California,” Abbott told Fast Money, referring to his meeting with Nasdaq officials last month. “We’re working across the board because the times of Covid revealed a lot. They revealed … that, for example, you really don’t have to be in Manhattan to be involved in the trading business or the investment business.”

In addition to the pandemic demonstrating the feasibility of more widespread remote working, Abbott said there are other characteristics that are pulling businesses to Texas. “Business costs mean a lot. No income tax means a lot, but the freedom to operate without the strict hand of regulation also means a lot,” he said.

“This has become an absolute tidal wave,” added Abbott, while many companies like Oracle were in Texas prior to their official announcements. “They are looking for a state that gives them the independence, the autonomy and the freedom to set their own course.”

Abbott also cited Texas’s relationship with Elon Musk, the executive director of electric vehicle maker Tesla and SpaceX, as evidence of the state’s growing appeal to business leaders.

Musk personally moved to Texas from California, and earlier this year Tesla announced that it had selected a location near Austin to build its next U.S. factory. SpaceX also has a growing facility in Boca Chica, Texas, on the Gulf Coast. “Elon is delighted to be here,” said Abbott, adding that the two men “talk to each other practically weekly.”

Categories
Politics

Battleground states urge Supreme Courtroom to reject Texas’ bid to overturn Biden wins

The battlefield states, whose results of the Texas presidential election are being challenged in the Supreme Court, urged judges Thursday not to take up the case.

The four states to which the lawsuit pertained warned in unusually harsh briefs that granting Texas’s unprecedented demand for “violence against the constitution” and “disenfranchises millions of voters”.

These states – Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia – all confirmed their election results, with Democrat Joe Biden defeating President Donald Trump.

Almost simultaneously, Washington, DC Attorney General Karl Racine filed a brief in the court on behalf of the District of Columbia and 22 states and territories in defense of the four states targeted by Texas.

This court friend was joined by California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Guam, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon. Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, US Virgin Islands, and Washington.

The flood of important briefings related to the case – including Trump’s own request to intervene – recalled the dramatic and ongoing polarization in the US just weeks after one of the most controversial elections.

Pennsylvania called Ken Paxton’s long-term attempt to overturn elections in other states “legally unreasonable” and “a violation of the principles of constitutional democracy” in his letter.

“Texas is trying to invalidate elections in four states to get results it disagrees with,” says Pennsylvania.

Dana Nessel, the Michigan attorney general, in her state’s statement, urged the court to immediately dismiss the Texas case.

“Otherwise this court would become the arbiter of all future national elections,” wrote Nessel.

“The basis of Texas’ claims rests on the allegation that Michigan violated its own electoral laws. Not true,” added Nessel. “That claim has been dismissed in Michigan federal and state courts, and just yesterday the Michigan Supreme Court denied a final attempt to move for review.”

Christopher Carr, the Georgia attorney general, told the court that Texas was “transferring Georgia’s electoral powers to the federal judiciary.”

“Respect for federalism and constitutionalism prohibits this transfer of power, but this court should never reach that issue,” he wrote.

The answers came a day after Trump asked the Supreme Court to let him intervene on the case. The president, who refuses to admit Biden, has hyped the Texas case as “the big one” – but electoral law experts say there’s little chance the court will allow it.

So far, the judges have not taken any action in this case. Despite Trump’s frequent appeals, the court has shown unwillingness to enter into any litigation related to the presidential election.

For example, the judges have not yet said whether they will hear a GOP challenge to postal ballot papers received in Pennsylvania after election day. On Tuesday, they rejected an appeal from a Trump ally who attempted to reverse the findings on that state in a one-line order with no disagreement noted.

Even so, Paxton’s case has raised hopes among Trump’s supporters, desperate for a full court order to cancel Biden’s planned victory. Large sections of the electorate are convinced by the President’s repeated, unproven, and often debunked claims that widespread electoral fraud influenced the election of Biden.

Seventeen states where Trump won the referendum fueled those views on Wednesday when they filed a pleading with the Supreme Court in support of the Texas case.

On Thursday afternoon, 106 Republican members of Congress, led by Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., Signed their own letter in support of Paxton’s lawsuit.

This mandate was written by Phillip Jauregui, an attorney for the Judicial Action Group, who states on his website that he is working for the “renewal of justice” and is calling for “a third great awakening”.

Trump and his electoral team have filed dozens of lawsuits in court to invalidate election results, and state lawmakers have appointed pro-Trump voters.

Many of these cases have already been dismissed – but Trump is still pursuing legal challenges in key states, even with less than a week left before voters meet to cast their votes.

Categories
Politics

States inform Supreme Court docket they assist Texas bid to reverse Biden win

United States President Donald Trump arrives to make remarks on the stock exchange during an unscheduled appearance on November 24, 2020 in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, DC.

Almond Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

Seventeen states whose elections were won by President Donald Trump told the Supreme Court on Wednesday that they support Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s offer to file a lawsuit that could effectively undo President-elect Joe Biden’s proposed election victory.

The filing of Paxton by these states came the day after he asked the Supreme Court for permission to sue Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, all of which Biden won, over their voting procedures.

Later on Wednesday, Trump filed a motion to intervene in the case “in his personal capacity” as a presidential candidate. The Supreme Court has not yet ruled on Paxton’s motion.

The states that support the lawsuit and that all have Republican attorneys general are Missouri, Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah. and West Virginia.

Trump defeated Biden in the referendum in all of these states despite Biden receiving one of Nebraska’s electoral votes.

Representatives of the four battlefield states targeted in the lawsuit did not immediately respond to CNBC’s requests for comment.

After Trump asked to intervene in the case, 17 former officials and lawmakers filed their own filings in support of the four swing states. They argued that Paxton’s case was not part of the Supreme Court, which suggests his claims could be made elsewhere.

“The constitution does not make this court a multi-district litigation panel for judicial proceedings in presidential election disputes,” the letter said.

The court record was signed by former officials who had worked in Republican administrations and several former members of the House and Senate.

Paxton’s case makes “a mockery of federalism and the separation of powers,” said her letter.

“It would be against the most basic constitutional principles for this court to act as the trial court for disputes in presidential elections.”

Paxton, a Republican who remains indicted on charges of securities fraud, is seeking permission from the Supreme Court to sue the four states for blocking their certification of Biden’s victories in them.

Paxton argues that a blockade is warranted because of allegedly inappropriate changes in voting procedures over the past year, alleged differences in the treatment of voters in democratic areas, and voting on “irregularities”.

The four swing state defendants will submit their responses to Paxton’s summons to the court on Thursday at 3 p.m.

The effort comes from the fact that all states confirmed their individual results of the presidential election, which shows that Biden easily won the national referendum.

Biden is expected to win the electoral college if it convenes on Monday by 36 votes, more than the minimum of 270 votes required to win the White House.

Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel said Tuesday Paxton’s filing was “a publicity stunt, not a serious appeal.”

“The erosion of trust in our democratic system is not due to the good people in Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia or Pennsylvania, but to partisan officials like Mr. Paxton who impose loyalty to a person loyalty to their country,” Nessel said in one Explanation.

“The Michigan issues raised in this complaint have been thoroughly tried and flatly denied in state and state courts by judges appointed by both political parties. Mr. Paxton’s actions are beneath the dignity of the attorney general and the great people State of Texas. “

Trump has refused to allow Biden to vote, claiming without evidence that he was the victim of widespread electoral fraud.

Trump and his election campaign, as well as their political allies, have repeatedly failed in their legal attempts to invalidate votes for Biden.

The Supreme Court declined Tuesday to hear a separate offer from Trump allied Republicans questioning Biden’s victory in Pennsylvania.

Suffrage experts saw this seemingly unanimous rejection as a signal that remaining efforts to undo Biden’s victory were all but doomed at the Supreme Court.

But the GOP plaintiffs in this case plan to file a formal appeal with the Supreme Court, The Hill reported Wednesday.

President and attorney Rudy Giuliani recently pushed for legislation in battlefield states whose popular elections were won by Biden to outvote their citizens and nominate a electoral roll for Trump to the electoral college.

Categories
Health

‘Small City, No Hospital’: Covid-19 Is Overwhelming Rural West Texas

ALPINE, Texas – It’s one of the fastest growing coronavirus hotspots in the nation, but there are no long lines of cars piled up for drive-through tests and no rush of appointments to be wiped down at CVS.

That’s because in the rugged, rural expanse of far west Texas, there isn’t a county health department that can get daily tests and no CVS business for more than 100 miles. A handful of clinics offer tests for those who can make an appointment.

Behind the teetering oil platforms of Midland and Odessa, where real road runners scurry down two-lane roads and desert bushes freckle the long, beige horizon, the Big Bend region of Texas is one of the most remote parts of the American mainland and one of the least equipped to break out to treat infectious diseases. There is only one 12,000 square kilometer hospital and no heart or lung specialists to treat serious cases of Covid-19.

But as a sign that the virus is on the rise almost everywhere, the counties that Big Bend belongs to were in the nation’s top 20 for most new cases per capita last week.

Known for its sprawling national park and the artist town of Marfa, Big Bend provides an extreme example of the danger that is unfolding across the country as the virus flares further and more furiously than ever, driving deaths to levels seen since spring and push many places into crisis at the same time. From California to Texas to Mississippi, hospitals and health officials in rural communities are increasingly concerned that they are alone.

“There is no neurologist, there is no long-term care specialist,” said Dr. JP Schwartz, Big Bend’s Presidio County health department and a doctor at a local clinic. “We don’t want to help them at all. There isn’t even a nursing home out here. “

Even with Texas hospitalizations and deaths near their summer peaks, local officials fear they have little power to intervene beyond the measures taken by Republican Governor Greg Abbott.

“My hands are tied,” said Eleazar R. Cano, the Brewster County judge, who said he was advised against issuing a stay at home order or other stricter measures that could violate the governor’s order. Mr. Cano, a Democrat, likened governing during the pandemic to driving his truck through the desert with an empty gas tank without a cell phone operator calling for help.

“It’s helpless, frustrating, almost panicking,” he said.

On the long miles between the sparsely populated cities of Big Bend, it’s hard to fathom how a virus that thrives on human contact can flare up in a place so vast. Falcons rule in the great blue sky. Cell phone service is spotty. Christmas decorations along the street are not in people’s homes, but on the gates of their ranch.

But somehow new cases have exploded in the past few weeks.

In Brewster County, a sprawling giant of 9,200 residents in an area of ​​6,000 square miles, more than half of the 700+ known cases were identified last month. In neighboring Presidio County of 6,700 people near the Mexico border, cases have quadrupled from less than 100 to more than 470 in the past two months. Both communities are older, with 65 and over making up about a quarter of the population.

“The numbers are rising at this point,” said Malynda Richardson, the presidio city ambulance director, who coughed sporadically as she recovered from the freezing chills and knockout exhaustion of Covid-19.

There are a number of reasons for the spike.

The area is so remote that local residents have to travel to El Paso or Odessa to schedule a doctor’s appointment and buy essentials at Walmart. With cases popping up across west Texas, the virus may have come back with them. Officials also cited border traffic from Mexico, cases among young people at Sul Ross State University, and an increase in tourists who were not deterred by the pandemic.

Big Bend National Park visitor numbers rose 20 percent in October, park officials said, and so many cars clogged the park over Thanksgiving weekend that it jammed. In the liberal artist outpost of Marfa, young people from Austin and Dallas roam the city, sipping on almond milk and photographing murals that ask existential questions such as, “Is austerity an illusion?” A recent art installation caused a stir during the pandemic with an obvious message against tourism: “Everyone here hates you.”

However, it turns out that tourism isn’t the biggest part of the problem.

The limited contact tracing in the region shows greater local penetration – in bars, in multi-generational homes, and by people who ignore positive test results and continue to work and socialize as usual.

In Alpine, the largest city with 5,900 residents, residents wear masks with their cowboy hats to shop at Porter’s grocery store, but remove them to eat inside at local restaurants. There is no general consensus on whether masks are necessary and effective. In a sign of the controversy that has played out on social media and off-social media, the county was left without a local health authority when the doctor in the position, a volunteer pediatrician, resigned this fall after being told by local residents who opposed, had been pushed back mask orders and other restrictions.

Brewster County, which also includes Alpine, has already ordered bars to shut down and reduce food in indoor restaurants from 75 percent to 50 percent, as the governor’s order for counties with a high percentage of Covid-19 hospital stays prescribes. However, enforcement is incomplete, and the governor has prohibited local officials from imposing stricter rules than his own.

Because of the scarcity of resources, local health clinics are a prime option for testing, but even then, the swabs must be driven to El Paso for three hours and flown out of Dallas for processing in Arlington. The National Guard also offers regular tests. In response to the growing crisis, new mobile test vehicles should arrive this week.

For those who get seriously ill, the hospital, the Big Bend Regional Medical Center in Alpine, only has 25 beds and a makeshift Covid ward where patients were confiscated at the end of the lonely, L-shaped hallway.

Dr. John Ray, a family doctor who works shifts at the hospital, said the hospital had received consecutive calls for incoming coronavirus patients on a final day. One of them had to be taken to a larger hospital in Odessa to receive special care.

Not long after that, said Dr. Ray, he saw the patient’s obituary in the newspaper.

“I don’t want to see Alpine like the pictures you see in New York, just people dying in hallways and waiting for a bed,” said Dr. Ray, 44, who grew up in the small town of Troup, East Texas, Wisconsin for his residency and then returned to Texas to settle in the Big Bend for Beauty and People area in 2013. He and his wife, also a doctor, usually treat a lot of sore throats, urinary tract infections, and pregnancy visits. Now he said: “It’s Covid, Covid, Covid.”

Higher-level hospitals are also full across West Texas. El Paso, which was recently so inundated with infection that it created mobile morgues, is still recovering from its own virus deluge. Lubbock recently had up to 50 percent of beds filled with Covid patients, and on a particularly bad day last week, the city reported that overall hospital capacity was depleted.

Dr. Ray fears there may be a day when critically ill patients who would normally be moved to another location run out of options. “To be very clear,” he said, “if you can’t go anywhere else, you will die here.”

A spokeswoman for Big Bend Regional Medical Center said the hospital has had room so far, adding ventilators, oxygen tanks and nurses to prepare for a surge. Of nine patients in the hospital on Wednesday, four had Covid-19.

Even so, many remain concerned. Simone Rubi, 46, graphic designer and musician who owns a café in Marfa, about 30 minutes by car from the Alpine hospital, hung a poster in front of her to-go window and summarized the precarious situation in four words: “Small town, no hospital . “

“There will be no place for us if we get sick – that’s the bottom line,” she said, sitting on a picnic bench outside her shop on a Saturday morning.

“We’d have to go to Dallas,” said her husband Rob Gungor, who said he had asthma and was resigned to making the nearly eight-hour drive to an Airbnb near a major hospital if he contracted the virus to get it to be around in case it turns bad. Like most people in Marfa, who accepted masks more easily than some other cities in Big Bend, he also wore a mask outdoors.

“Maybe Phoenix,” he added, “because it’s only a nine-hour drive.”

For those living in even more rural parts of West Texas, navigating the coronavirus spike has consequences that go well beyond the virus itself.

There is only one full-service ambulance covering 3,000 square miles in the border community of Terlingua. In some cases, paramedics had to drive coronavirus patients to Alpine hospital for three hours to clear the area for other serious emergencies.

“That has always been our draw – it’s an isolated, beautiful, pristine landscape,” said Sara Allen Colando, Terlingua District Commissioner. But as the cases rise, the wilderness is also its own peril.

“If you have to take someone to God with Covid, where, how long does it take to get this ambulance back up and running?” She said. “Who will be there to take the call?”

Mitch Smith contributed to coverage from Chicago.

Categories
Politics

Texas sues 4 battleground states in Supreme Court docket over ‘illegal election outcomes’

Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Tuesday a lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate the results of the presidential election results in four major swing states that helped defeat Democrat Joe Biden President Donald Trump secure.

The unusual lawsuit, filed directly with the Supreme Court, alleges that “unlawful election results” in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan – all won by Biden – should be declared unconstitutional.

Legal experts were quick to dismiss the case as a political theater with no precedent in American history.

The filing argues that these states used the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse to unlawfully change their electoral rules “through executive fiat or amicable lawsuits which weakened the integrity of the ballot papers”.

“All electoral college votes cast by such presidential voters appointed” in these states “cannot be counted,” Texas urges the Supreme Court to rule.

The Lone Star State’s attempt to devalue other states’ electoral votes follows a series of long-term legal challenges with similar goals that have been brought to court by Trump’s campaign and other lawyers. These lawsuits have repeatedly failed to invalidate the ballots cast for Biden.

The allegations in the Texas lawsuit “are false and irresponsible,” Georgia Deputy Secretary of State Jordan Fuchs said in a fiery statement shortly after Paxton announced legal action.

“Texas claims that there are 80,000 forged signatures on postal ballots in Georgia, but they don’t bring up a single person to whom this happened. That’s because it didn’t,” Fuchs said.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel called the suit a “publicity stunt” and “below the dignity” of Paxton’s office. Josh Kaul, the Wisconsin attorney general, said in a statement the case was “really embarrassing.”

Suffrage experts also quickly dismissed the likelihood that the nine Supreme Court justices would open the case. Paul Smith, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center who argued over proxy cases in the Supreme Court, said the case was “insane”.

“Pennsylvania and the rest of the world have a whole system of voting through the election – that’s all,” said Smith, who also serves as vice president of litigation and strategy for the Justice Center for Impartial Campaigns. “I don’t think the Supreme Court will be interested.”

The professor added that Texas may have difficulty proving that it has grounds for action that are legally known as “standing”.

“It is completely unprecedented for any state to claim in the Supreme Court that other states’ votes were cast incorrectly – that never happened,” he said. “What is the violation of the state of Texas because Pennsylvania’s votes were cast for Mr. Biden instead of Mr. Trump? There is no connection there.”

Rick Hasen, an electoral law expert at the University of California at Irvine, wrote on his popular legal blog that the lawsuit was “utter rubbish,” and also denied the idea that Texas stood, noting that “it has no say like other states vote for voters. “

Paxton wrote in the letter that Texas stands because of its interest in which party controls the Senate, which it says “represents the states”.

“While Americans are probably more concerned with who is elected president, states have a clear interest in who is elected vice president and who can thus cast the decisive vote in the Senate,” he wrote.

“This violation is particularly acute in 2020, when a Senate majority often maintains a tie for the vice president as the balance between the Georgia elections in January is nearly the same – and may be the same depending on the outcome of the Georgia runoffs.” political parties, “added Paxton.

The lawsuit against the four states ends with a critical deadline in the electoral certification process known as the “Safe Harbor” threshold. Thereafter, Congress is forced to accept the states’ certified results.

Six days later, the electoral college voters will cast their votes, marking Biden’s victory. The lawsuit also calls on the Supreme Court to extend the December 14 deadline “so that these investigations can be completed”.

In most cases, the Supreme Court hears only lower court cases that have been appealed. In cases between two or more states, however, the court originally has jurisdiction. Usually four judges have to agree to hear a case.

The lawsuit comes when Paxton faces a criminal investigation by the FBI into alleged efforts to help a wealthy campaign donor. The investigation was confirmed by The Associated Press after seven senior lawyers in Paxton’s office accused authorities in September that Paxton was guilty of abuse of his office.

All seven have since been fired, on leave or resigned, which has led several of them to file whistleblower lawsuits. Paxton has denied wrongdoing.

The case is not the first on election to reach the judges, although the court has not yet made a substantial decision on either side. In another lawsuit that the court may soon weigh, Pennsylvania’s Republican Representative Mike Kelly, an ally of Trump, is challenging virtually all of the state’s postal ballot papers and asking the court to nullify millions of votes.

Biden is expected to win 306 electoral college votes – 36 more than needed to beat Trump, who is said to receive 232 such votes.

But Trump refuses to allow Biden. The president, more than a month after election day, continues to falsely insist that he has won the race while promoting a wide range of unproven conspiracy theories allegedly pointing to election or election fraud.

The president is also pressuring swing state officials to take action to discard the results of their elections. Trump has heavily criticized Republican Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, furiously demanding that he convene a special session of the Peach State Legislature to appoint pro-Trump voters.

Trump has personally reached out to Kemp and Pennsylvania House spokesman Bryan Cutler, according to Washington Post reports. In November, Trump received Michigan Republican lawmakers for a meeting at the White House. These lawmakers said after the event that they had no plans to replace Biden’s voters.

Even ahead of the election, Trump predicted that the Supreme Court would likely rule the results of the race and urged the GOP-controlled Senate to bank Justice Amy Coney Barrett in time.

However, in recent weeks, Trump has admitted that he is unlikely to turn the 2020 election results in court on its head as his legal challenges have stalled.

“Well, the problem is that getting to the Supreme Court is difficult,” Trump told Fox News last month in his first full interview since his November 3rd defeat.

“I have the best lawyers in the Supreme Court, attorneys who want to discuss the case when it gets there. They said, ‘It’s very hard to get a case up there,'” Trump added. “Can you imagine Donald Trump, President of the United States, filing a case and I probably can’t get a case.”