Categories
Health

Biden Covid response workforce holds briefing after J&J requests FDA OK for vaccine

[The stream is slated to start at 11 a.m. ET. Please refresh the page if you do not see a player above at that time.]

President Joe Biden’s Covid-19 Response Team will hold a briefing Friday on the coronavirus pandemic that left at least 455,875 Americans dead.

The briefing comes one day after Johnson & Johnson asked the Food and Drug Administration to approve the unique Covid-19 vaccine for use in the United States. The FDA has scheduled a meeting of its Advisory Committee on Vaccines and Related Biological Products in February 26 to discuss the vaccine, which could be distributed in the US as early as this month.

Federal and state officials are eagerly awaiting approval of J & J’s vaccine.Unlike Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines, which require two doses three to four weeks apart, J & J’s drugs only require one dose , which makes logistics easier for healthcare providers.

Read CNBC’s live updates for the latest news on the Covid-19 outbreak.

Categories
Politics

Biden Staff Delays Naming Some Interim Officers Till Trump Is Out

Although the Biden team did not publicly disclose the names of some officials, the identities appear to be known within the agencies. A person briefed on the process said the Biden team had selected Lora Shiao to serve as director of national intelligence until the Senate upheld the election of Mr Biden, Avril D. Haines. She has been the agency’s Chief Operating Officer since September. Similarly, one person briefed on the decision said that Monty Wilkinson, a low profile hiring manager at the Justice Department, would step up as acting attorney general.

In some cases it was not easy to find an interim officer. At the Department of Defense, the Biden team struggled to appoint a Trump agent, David L. Norquist, to the department, if only for a few days until Mr Biden’s candidate, Lloyd J. Austin III, is confirmed. By law, a Senate-approved member of the department, in this case Mr. Norquist, automatically takes over the duties of secretary when the secretary is absent. Mr. Biden ultimately chose to stick with the tradition, and Mr. Norquist will do so until Mr. Austin is sworn in.

The Biden transition team has reason not to trust Trump loyalists in at least one instance. In the past few months, transition officials have clashed with senior Pentagon officials. First, the Pentagon blocked the transition team’s access to some intelligence agencies. Then the Pentagon announced in briefings in mid-December a “mutually agreed vacation break”, only to tell Biden transition numbers that there was no such agreement. The Pentagon hired a Trump loyalist, Kashyap Patel, to oversee the transition, which frustrated some members of the president-elect’s transition team.

In a sign of persistent tension, the Biden transition team refused to vacate office space at the Pentagon after the inauguration, Christopher C. Miller, the acting Secretary of Defense. An official on the Biden transition team cited Mr Miller’s status and the coronavirus pandemic for the decision previously reported by Bloomberg.

At the Justice Department, the Biden team was looking for an interim attorney general who, at any point during the Trump administration, was not involved in the myriad political scandals that have defined the agency.

In the election of Mr. Wilkinson, who oversaw the Department of Justice’s human resources, security planning and library and is unknown even to most Washington insiders, the Biden transition team hoped for a stable and drama-free hand to lead the department through to the judge Merrick B. Garland, Mr. Biden’s candidate for attorney general, could be confirmed in the coming weeks, according to a person briefed on the decision.

For the most part, the publicly appointed interim agency directors across government are impartial career officials.

Categories
Health

W.H.O. Group in Wuhan to Hint Coronavirus

More than a year after a new coronavirus first emerged in China, a team of experts from the World Health Organization arrived in downtown Wuhan on Thursday to look for its source.

Research by the team of 10 scientists is a crucial step in understanding how the virus jumped from animals to humans so that another pandemic can be avoided. Getting answers will most likely be difficult.

The Chinese government, known to have no outside control, has repeatedly obstructed the team’s arrival and investigation. Even in the best of circumstances, a full exam can take months, if not longer. The team must also steer China’s attempts to politicize the investigation.

Here’s What You Should Know About Investigation.

Visa delays. Quarantine rules. Political stone wall.

Apparently concerned about redirecting attention to the country’s early mistakes in dealing with the pandemic, Chinese officials used various tactics over the past year to obstruct the WHO’s investigation.

After China resisted demands from other nations to allow independent researchers on its soil to investigate the pathogen’s origin, China finally invited two WHO experts to visit in July to lay the foundations. Then the team was immediately quarantined for 14 days and its members forced to do some of their detective work remotely.

They were not allowed to visit Wuhan, where the virus first appeared.

China delayed approval of a full team of experts for a visit for months, frustrating health department leaders. When the visit appeared to be completed earlier this month, it fell apart at the last minute when Beijing failed to provide visas for visitors, according to the health department. Dr. World Health Organization director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus issued a rare reprimand against Beijing at a press conference, saying he was “very disappointed” with the delays.

The Chinese government has requested that Chinese scientists oversee key parts of the investigation. It has restricted the global health agency’s access to key research and data. The entire WHO team must be quarantined in Wuhan for two weeks before they can start sleeping.

Critics say Beijing’s desire for control means that the investigation will most likely be more political than scientific.

“They want this investigation to be thorough, non-politicizable, independent and transparent,” said Yanzhong Huang, senior fellow on global health at the Council on Foreign Relations. “But we have to be realistic.”

Despite the problems, the WHO intends to conduct a rigorous and transparent study.

“From the outset, WHO made a commitment to investigate the origins of the virus,” Tarik Jašarević, a spokesman for the agency, said in a statement. “We call on all countries to support these efforts through openness and transparency.”

The team, which has arrived in Wuhan, according to official broadcaster CGTN, will be faced with a city that has changed radically since the virus first appeared in late 2019. The city, which was locked down on January 23 last year and became the symbol of the virus’s devastation, stopped a year later by Chinese officials as a success story in overcoming the virus – a city reborn.

Updated

Jan. 14, 2021 at 12:11 AM ET

WHO experts have decades of experience in research into viruses, animal health and disease control. They come from the UK, Germany, Japan, Russia, the US and other countries. Peter Daszak, a British disease ecologist, and Hung Nguyen, a Vietnamese scientist studying zoonotic diseases, are among the team members.

However, finding the source of the virus, which has killed nearly two million people worldwide and infected more than 92 million as of Thursday, will be arduous. While experts believe the virus came naturally from animals, possibly bats, little else is known.

The team is expected to investigate the earliest reported cases of the virus in China and, most likely, to examine data from samples collected in a sprawling wet market in Wuhan that sold game meat and live animals. Many of the first reported infections have been traced there.

How much access the team in China gets will be crucial, according to public health experts.

You should be able to review all of the data collected by the Chinese Center for Disease Control on the outbreak, “including contact tracing, environmental sampling, genetic sequences and patient zero identification,” said Raina MacIntyre, director of biosecurity programs at the University of New’s Kirby Institute South Wales in Sydney, Australia. “It is important to do this comprehensively and transparently.”

The health department has not specified how long the examination will take, nor has published a detailed itinerary for the team’s visit.

Marion Koopmans, a Dutch virologist on the WHO team, said the study was a “long-term project”.

“We will summarize and discuss all the scientific information that has already been collected by our colleagues in China:” What does this tell us? “She said in a recent interview with CGTN, the Chinese international broadcaster.” Is there any information we’d like to add? How could that be done? “

The pandemic has damaged China’s reputation, and many foreign governments are still angry that Beijing did nothing more to contain the crisis at its earliest stages. Chinese propagandists are therefore trying to use the WHO investigation to strengthen China’s image and portray the country as a mature superpower.

“China is open, frank and righteous,” Xinhua, the official news agency, said in a comment on the investigation on Wednesday.

The WHO itself has also been under attack by the Trump administration for appearing to bow to the will of China, despite criticism of the United States for its ineffective response to the pandemic. Before the team landed, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said on Twitter Tuesday, “The @WHO has been corrupted and bought cheap by China’s influence. WHO investigators still have no access to Wuhan – a year after the first cases were reported? “

On the same day, Global Times, a national tabloid, wrote that the upcoming visit showed that China “has always sought to contribute to the global fight against the pandemic with a transparent, responsible attitude and a spirit of respect for science.”

The Chinese government has tried to advance unsubstantiated theories that the virus emerged outside of China. Chinese scientists have suggested with no evidence that packaged foods from overseas could have brought the virus to China or that the pandemic could have started in India.

The heated political climate will make it difficult for WHO to conduct an independent investigation, experts say.

“The main concern here is that the origin of the outbreak has been so politicized,” said Huang, the global health expert. “That has really limited the space for independent, objective and scientific investigation of the WHO.”

Albee Zhang and Claire Fu did research.