Categories
World News

U.S. firms bearing the brunt of Trump’s China tariffs, says Moody’s

A Chinese and US flag on a booth during the first China International Import Expo in Shanghai, November 6, 2018.

Johannes Eisele | AFP | Getty Images

American companies are bearing most of the cost burden from the increased tariffs introduced at the height of the US-China trade war, Moody’s Investors Service said.

The rating agency said in a report on Monday that US importers absorbed more than 90% of the additional costs resulting from the US 20% tariff on Chinese goods.

This means that US importers will pay around 18.5% more for a Chinese product subject to this 20% tariff, while Chinese exporters will get 1.5% less for the same product, according to the report.

If tariffs persist, pressure on US retailers is likely to increase, resulting in greater passage to consumer prices

Moody’s Investors Service

“Much of the customs charges have been passed on to US importers,” Moody’s said in the report.

“If tariffs stay in place, pressure on US retailers is likely to increase, leading to more swirling through to consumer prices,” the agency added.

During the tenure of former US President Donald Trump, higher trade tariffs came into force. Most of these tariffs have remained and affect more than half of all trade flows between the US and China, Moody’s said.

US tariffs on Chinese goods averaged 19.3% on a trade-weighted basis in early 2021, while Chinese tariffs on American products were around 20.7%, according to the think tank Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Before the US-China trade war in early 2018, US tariffs on Chinese goods averaged 3.1%, while Chinese tariffs on American goods averaged 8%.

Categories
Business

U.S., EU to droop tariffs in effort to resolve Boeing-Airbus subsidy dispute

Boeing and Airbus compete against each other at the Paris Air Show 2013.

Fabrice Dimier | Bloomberg | Getty Images

The US and the European Union will suspend tariffs for four months in a long-standing dispute over illegal subsidies for Boeing and Airbus, the President of the European Commission said on Friday.

The deal is a step towards resolving the 17-year-old dispute that has resulted in retaliatory tariffs on billions in goods covering a range of exports from both sides of the Atlantic. It comes a day after the US and UK also agreed a four-month hiatus on tariffs linked to the dispute.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she spoke to US President Joe Biden about the issue on Friday.

The move would remove tariffs on goods imported from the European Union worth $ 7.5 billion, including airplanes, cheese and wine, and tariffs on EU imports of US airplanes, tractors, vodka and rum, and tobacco Interrupt worth $ 4 billion.

“We are both committed to focusing on resolving our aircraft disputes based on the work of our respective sales agents,” she said in a statement. “This is excellent news for companies and industries on both sides of the Atlantic and a very positive signal for our economic cooperation in the coming years.”

The White House said Biden and von der Leyen were discussing transatlantic cooperation to stop the spread of Covid-19, measures to improve the economy, climate change and other issues.

Progress in settling the dispute is a relief for Airbus and Boeing, both of which are grappling with weak demand for travel and jetliners due to the Covid-19 pandemic.

“Airbus welcomes the decision to suspend tariffs so that negotiations can take place,” the manufacturer said in a statement. “We support all necessary measures to create a level playing field and continue to support a negotiated solution to this long-standing dispute in order to avoid losses.”

Correction: The move would disrupt tariffs on EU imports of US planes, tractors, vodka and rum, and tobacco valued at $ 4 billion. In an earlier version it was incorrectly stated which duties the duties relate to.

Categories
Business

U.S. Firms Face China Tariffs as Exclusions Expire

WASHINGTON – American companies have to pay higher taxes on some of the products imported from China as the tariff bans that protected many companies from President Trump’s trade war expired at midnight Thursday.

Mr Trump began imposing tariffs on Chinese goods valued at more than $ 360 billion in 2018, prompting thousands of companies to ask the administration for temporary exemptions exempting them from the duties. Companies that met certain requirements received a tax return that ranged from 7.5 to 25 percent. These included companies that import electric motors, microscopes, salad spinners, thermostats, breast pumps, ball bearings, forklifts and other products.

The majority of these exclusions, which could run into billions in revenue for US-based companies, automatically expired at midnight on Thursday. After that, many companies will again have to pay a tax to the government to import a variety of goods from China, including textiles, industrial components and other miscellaneous products.

The Trump administration’s lack of clarity on whether it would extend bans left many companies in the balance.

The United States had announced some extensions – on December 23, the sales agent announced that it would extend the exclusions for a small category of medical care products, including hand sanitizers, masks, and medical devices, to March 31 to help fight the US help coronavirus pandemic.

However, Ben Bidwell, the director of US Customs at freight forwarder CH Robinson, who has assisted customers with filing for exclusions, said “the vast majority” of those granted would expire by the end of the year and importers would either one depending on the product additional tariff of 7.5 percent or 25 percent.

The United States sales agent “remained fairly silent about any extension,” Bidwell said.

The legislature campaigned for the administration to extend the exemptions. On December 11th, more than 70 members of Congress, including Republican Jackie Walorski of Indiana and Democrat Ron Kind of Wisconsin, sent a letter urging United States sales representative Robert E. Lighthizer to extend all of their active bans to help businesses affected by the pandemic.

“Our economy is still in a fragile state due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic,” the letter said. “The extension of these exclusions provides employers with the security they need and helps save jobs.”

Mr Trump introduced tariffs to protect some American industries from foreign competition and encourage others to move their supply chains out of China. The tariffs have partially achieved these goals, although most of the companies have relocated their activities to other low-cost countries such as Vietnam or Mexico rather than the USA.

Updated

Jan. 1, 2021, 4:30 p.m. ET

However, most economists say these gains resulted in a high price tag and hurt American manufacturing as a whole, greatly increasing the cost of imported components and making US manufacturers less competitive with other companies overseas.

Some companies say the elimination process was particularly unfair. While large corporations have invested large sums of money in hiring Washington law firms to lobby the administration and request exemptions, some small businesses have stated that they lacked the resources to request and win disqualifications.

“The expiration of these exclusions – especially because the facts supporting their original purpose remain unchanged – shows how arbitrary and capricious the process was,” said Stephen Lamar, executive director of the American Apparel & Footwear Association, the makers of footwear and footwear represents clothing.

“These companies could poorly afford a tax on their imported intermediate consumption and US workers when they originally applied for these exclusions, and they certainly can’t now,” he added.

Two other long-term programs that have exempted imported products from tariffs also expired on Thursday.

The Various Tariffs Act, which temporarily suspends tariffs on some imported goods, including inputs used by American manufacturers, and the Universal System of Preferences, which gives thousands of products from developing countries duty-free access to the US market, are ending Year expired the year. There has been little momentum in Congress to revive the programs as public opinion has gradually turned against initiatives to give foreign companies cheaper access to the American market in order to encourage free trade.

Company executives are unsure whether the future administration will adopt a different tactic, but President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. is unlikely to make any material changes in the near future.

In a December interview with the New York Times, Mr Biden said he would conduct a full review of the United States’ trade relations with China and consult with allies in Asia and Europe to develop a coherent strategy before changes are made.

“I’m not going to take any immediate steps, and that goes for tariffs too,” he said.