Categories
Politics

Republicans Flip-Flop on Assist for Afghanistan Withdrawal

WASHINGTON – Early last year, California MP Kevin McCarthy, House Minority Leader, praised former President Donald J. Trump’s deal to withdraw American troops from Afghanistan as a “positive move.” As Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo helped negotiate this deal with the Taliban. Missouri Senator Josh Hawley last November urged the withdrawal as soon as possible.

Now include the three to dozen prominent Republicans who sharply reversed themselves after President Biden enforced the withdrawal – attacking Mr Biden despite keeping a promise Mr Trump made and carrying out a policy they lead to had given their full support.

The collective U-turn reflects the Republicans’ eagerness to attack Mr Biden and ensure he pays a political price for ending the war. With Mr Trump reversing himself as the withdrawal turned chaotic and fatal in its endgame, it also offers new evidence of how allegiance to the former president has come to overcoming concerns about political flip-flops or political hypocrisy.

“You can’t go out in May and say, ‘This war was worthless and we have to bring the troops home,’ and now beat Biden for it,” said Illinois Representative Adam Kinzinger, a Republican who went broke with Mr. Trump after the Capitol – January 6 uprising and has long advocated maintaining a military presence in Afghanistan. “It’s no longer a shame.”

Mr Trump took office after revising his party’s longstanding position on foreign intervention and calling for the immediate removal of American troops stationed abroad. In February 2020, he announced a peace treaty negotiated by Pompeo with the Taliban, which provided for the end of the American presence by May 1, 2021.

After his defeat last November, Republicans clung to Trump’s first line of America. They urged Mr. Biden to abide by the May 1 deadline and publicly railed when Mr. Biden extended the date for a withdrawal to August 31, Arizona complained at the time.

But as the last few days of Americans in Afghanistan turned into a frantic race for more than 125,000 people – in which 13 soldiers were killed in a bombing raid outside Kabul airport – Republican lawmakers and candidates who voted Trump’s deal with the Taliban changed theirs Mood abrupt. They devastated Mr Biden for negotiating with the Taliban and condemned his declared zeal to dismantle the American presence in Afghanistan before 9/11, calling it a sign of weakness.

“I would not allow the Taliban to dictate the date of the Americans’ departure,” McCarthy said at a press conference on Friday. “But this president did, and I don’t think any other president, Republican or Democrat, except Joe Biden.”

Once defined by its falconry addiction, the GOP has been part of camps of traditional interventionists such as Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who never fully embraced Mr. Trump’s inward foreign policy, and supporters of Mr. Trump’s America, since Mr. Trump’s election in 2016 – first approach that shared his impatience to rescue the nation from intractable conflicts abroad.

Last year, Mr McConnell, the majority leader at the time, went before the Senate to condemn Mr Trump’s planned withdrawal from Afghanistan, warning that an early exit would be a “reminder of the humiliating American departure from Saigon.”

But beating Mr. Biden unites them all.

Republican calls for the resignation, impeachment or impeachment of Mr Biden under the 25th Amendment are also a reminder of how much more polarized the country’s politics have become since the start of the US war in Afghanistan immediately after September 11th Attacks when Democrats and Republicans alike backed President George W. Bush.

No Republican has turned against the Afghanistan withdrawal faster than Trump himself, who after years of returning to isolationism has spent the last two weeks attacking Biden for carrying out the exact withdrawal he demanded and then negotiated.

On April 18, Trump warned Mr. Biden to speed up the withdrawal schedule: “I planned to resign on May 1st,” he said. “We should stick to this schedule as closely as possible.”

However, when things seemed to get mixed up, the former president began speaking out against the withdrawal.

On August 24, Mr. Trump accused Mr. Biden of forcing the military to “run from the battlefield” and left “thousands” of Americans as “hostages”. And he suggested that Mr. Biden should have kept at least some troop presence in Afghanistan.

“We had Afghanistan and Kabul perfectly under control with only 2,500 soldiers and he destroyed it when they were told to flee!” Mr Trump said.

Other Republicans fell behind Mr Trump in the attack on the president: Mr McCarthy wrote a letter this week calling on lawmakers to argue that Mr Biden was solely responsible for “the worst foreign policy disaster in a generation.”

Updated

Sept. 1, 2021, 8:56 p.m. ET

However, their efforts have been hampered by Mr Trump’s rhetorical reversal, leaving Republicans struggling to articulate a view that contradicts neither his previous support for leaving Afghanistan nor his current stance on criticizing the withdrawal.

The results have made it difficult to see exactly what Mr Trump and his supporters are now actually believing.

Last week McCarthy claimed the United States shouldn’t keep troops in Afghanistan but then suggested keeping Bagram Air Base. When asked whether Trump had wrongly negotiated with the Taliban, McCarthy instead replied that the chaos of the withdrawal was under the supervision of Mr Biden, not Mr Trump’s.

Urged again on Tuesday to say whether the United States should maintain a military base in Afghanistan, McCarthy again disagreed. “The priority right now is what is the plan to get people home?” He said.

Understanding the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan

Map 1 of 6

Who are the Taliban? The Taliban emerged in 1994 amid the unrest following the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989. They used brutal public punishments, including flogging, amputation and mass executions, to enforce their rules. Here is more about their genesis and track record as rulers.

Who are the Taliban leaders? These are the top leaders of the Taliban, men who for years have been on the run, in hiding, in prison and dodging American drones. Little is known about them or how they plan to rule, including whether they will be as tolerant as they say they are. A spokesman told the Times that the group wanted to forget their past but had some restrictions.

To try to differentiate their support for the concept of withdrawal from their criticism of Mr Biden’s handling of the actual withdrawal, some Republicans – including Mr Pompeo, the former Secretary of State – claim that Mr Trump would have been tougher and not have tolerated the advance of the Taliban on Kabul. They suggest he stopped the withdrawal and said the Taliban had violated the terms of the peace agreement.

But the terms negotiated by the Trump administration were largely vague, and nothing in the deal required that the Taliban cease military campaigns, not capture Kabul, or agree to a power-sharing deal with the Afghan government.

The Republicans have yet to reveal any specific terms that they believe the Taliban violated. And those who praised Mr Trump’s plan but attacked Mr Biden’s withdrawal have made few substantive suggestions as to what the president should have done differently.

“Last year there was a plan that was handed over to the Biden administration that I supported and that would have worked,” Rep. Clay Higgins, a Louisiana Republican, told a press conference Tuesday held by the far-right House Freedom Caucus was held.

But he made no reference to the blueprint he said had disregarded Mr. Biden.

Some of the loudest criticism of Mr Biden came from lawmakers who urged him to speed up the withdrawal from Afghanistan on the grounds that there would never be a good time to leave.

Missouri Senator Mr. Hawley wrote in November that “the time has come to end the war in Afghanistan” and urged Mr. Trump’s acting Secretary of Defense to withdraw troops “as soon as possible.” In April he publicly complained about Mr. Biden’s extension of the withdrawal period. But after Thursday’s bombing, Mr Hawley called for Mr Biden’s resignation, arguing that the chaotic retreat was not inevitable, but rather the product of Mr Biden’s failed leadership.

“We must reject the lie put forward by a useless president that this is the only option for withdrawal,” said Hawley.

Those with smaller megaphones also showed flexibility.

Wisconsin Rep. Glenn Grothman was a cheerleader for Mr Trump’s withdrawal plans. As the senior Republican on the House Oversight Committee’s National Security Subcommittee, he praised the “Taliban peace treaty” for the months that followed, during which no Americans were killed in Afghanistan. Again and again he praised Mr. Trump for getting the troops off the ground.

However, when chaos erupted in Kabul, Mr. Grothman became a vocal critic of the withdrawal. “It doesn’t surprise me,” that the Afghan government fell quickly to the Taliban, he told WFDL, a local radio station in his district. He argued that US troops should have stayed.

“I don’t see how you can go because what will happen if you don’t get people out in the face of the Taliban?” Mr. Grothman told the radio station. “Are they going to kill people?”

In an interview, Mr Grothman argued that Mr Trump looked strong in negotiating the peace deal with the Taliban, while Mr Biden’s failure to prevent last week’s violence made him look weak.

He said he did not remember praising Trump’s agreement to withdraw from Afghanistan. Still, he added, “We didn’t know how the deal would turn out.”

Categories
Politics

Trump will get little help from main Republican donors

Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference announcing a class action lawsuit against major tech companies at Trump National Golf Club Bedminster on July 07, 2021 in Bedminster, New Jersey.

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images

Several of the Republican Party’s largest and most influential donors are signaling that, for the moment, at least, they have no plans to fund former President Donald Trump’s political operation.

Wealthy financiers like Stephen Ross and Larry Ellison have instead chosen to spend money on the GOP’s efforts to retake Congress in next year’s midterm elections or have supported potential 2024 presidential candidates like Sens. Marco Rubio from Florida and Tim Scott from South Carolina.

Donors are also concerned about how Trump’s organization is spending the mountains of money it has raised from smaller donations.

“Big money, sophisticated people just lose interest in this s — show,” said an adviser to longtime Trump ally in Silicon Valley. Many donors are tired of seeing the former president use his resources on rallies that often make false claims, including the fact that his election was stolen, this person said.

Trump hasn’t ruled out a 2024 presidential run, and he hasn’t made any official announcements. Its political action committees have raised large amounts of money through email and SMS appeals to supporters who frequently criticize President Joe Biden’s performance, most recently his handling of the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

The Trump PACs had over $ 100 million available as of the first half of 2021. CNBC previously reported that its PACs spent nearly $ 8 million on legal fees and over $ 200,000 on Trump’s real estate earlier this year.

“Donors do not donate from the goodness of their hearts. And right now they are being asked to donate to an organization that has no other purpose than pumping money to someone who doesn’t need it and doesn’t use it,” said a Republican Strategist representing financiers on Wall Street: “They have better things to do.”

The donor advisors speaking to CNBC declined to be featured in this story to avoid retaliation from Trump and his supporters.

A Trump spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

The pro-Trump Make America Great Again Action Super PAC, which raised over $ 1.5 million in July and August, is not without some wealthy donors, according to new federal electoral commission filings. MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, who is passionate about false claims about the 2020 election, is among the funders, as are businesswoman and former GOP Senator Kelly Loeffler, Texas bank director Andrew Beal and casino magnate Phillip Ruffin.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

But bigger Republican fundraising forces are instead focusing on efforts by House leadership Kevin McCarthy to retake the House of Representatives and funding pro-GOP redistribution efforts like the National Republican Redistricting Trust. Others support the re-election campaigns of potential presidential candidates in 2024 such as Scott, Rubio and Florida’s Governor Ron DeSantis.

Several people who had previously supported Trump recently hosted a fundraiser for DeSantis’ 2022 gubernatorial campaign in the Upper Hamptons, Long Island. The invitation to the July event shows that the event co-hosts included former Trump Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and billionaire investors Stephen Ross, John Paulson and Ken Griffin.

Paulson was one of the few Wall Street donors to support Trump’s 2020 presidential bid in the final phase of the campaign.

Stephen Ross, who also owns the Miami Dolphins, came under fire in 2019 when he hosted a fundraiser for Trump in the Hamptons. Ross and other directors of Related Cos. are investors in the luxury fitness brand Equinox. SoulCycle and Equinox distanced themselves from the Trump event when customers threatened to boycott.

Wilbur Ross and a Paulson representative did not respond to requests for comment. A spokesman for Stephen Ross declined to comment.

Neither Oracle CEO Larry Ellison nor Oracle CEO Safra Catz made large sums of money available to Trump’s PACs after the election. Both helped raise money for Trump’s re-election campaign. Ellison’s California home was the site of a Trump fundraiser last year. However, in June of that year, Ellison donated $ 5 million to a super PAC that supported Scott’s re-election efforts in South Carolina.

A spokesman for Catz and Ellison did not respond to a request for comment.

The Republican Jewish Coalition, whose PAC supported Trump in last year’s elections, is co-hosting a New York fundraiser for Rubio’s 2022 re-election campaign in September, according to an invitation. The RJC’s board of directors includes a number of influential Republicans, including the co-founder of Home Depot , Bernard Marcus, former Trump adviser Jason Greenblatt and former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer.

Trump may also not be able to count on financial help from Miriam Adelson, a mega-donor and widow of the late casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who died earlier this year. The couple were among the few business leaders who supported Trump in the last election. They gave millions to a pro-Trump super PAC in the last few months of the campaign.

Since her husband’s death, Adelson has privately told her allies that she has no immediate plans to use much of her money in politics for the time being. That could change as the midterms approach. Records show that in June, Adelson contributed $ 5,000 to the Stand for America PAC, a committee formed by potential 2024 contender and former Trump United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley.

A spokesman for Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands company declined to comment.

Another major Trump and GOP financier is in legal hot water. Investor Tom Barrack was arrested for illegally lobbying then President Trump on behalf of the United Arab Emirates. Barrack has pleaded not guilty to the charges. Even if he had no issues with the Feds, Barrack had hinted that he might not have supported Trump, his longtime friend, for a run in 2024.

“Today it looks like it’s a campaign of division that I’m not interested in,” Barrack told Bloomberg News before he was arrested.

A Barrack spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah were huge supporters of Trump during the 2016 campaign, but there is no indication that they will endorse him in 2024. CNBC reported in 2018 that the Mercers were planning to cut their financial support for Trump.

Records show that the Mercers did not write major checks to Trump’s PACs after his presidency.

For the time being, they are banking on a new face in GOP politics: “Hillbilly Elegy” author and venture capitalist JD Vance, who, after criticizing the ex-president, has taken several nationalist positions in the style of Trump in the past.

Robert and Rebekah Mercer together donated $ 150,000 to a Super PAC in March that supports Vance’s candidacy for the Ohio Senate seat, vacated by retiring Republican Rob Portman.

Mercers representatives did not respond to requests for comment.

Categories
Politics

Airbnb, Verizon, Walmart supply assist to Afghan refugees

Afghan refugees are led to a bus taking them to a refugee processing center upon arrival at Dulles International Airport in Dulles, Virginia August 25, 2021.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

Businesses are rushing to support the thousands of refugees that have been evacuated from Afghanistan in recent days who are now faced with the difficult task of building a new life in an unfamiliar country.

Airbnb, Verizon, Walmart and Texas Medical Technology are among those who have offered to help the 100,000 plus people to have fled the country to the U.S. after Kabul fell to the Taliban on Aug. 15.

On Tuesday, Airbnb CEO Brian Chesky said the company is planning to temporarily house 20,000 refugees around the world free of charge.

Refugees will be housed in properties listed on Airbnb’s platform and the stays will be funded by Airbnb, Chesky said on Twitter, without specifying exactly how much the company plans to spend on the commitment or how long refugees will be housed for.

Airbnb on Thursday invited non-hosts to help through its dedicated website for emergency housing that allows property owners to offer up any available space for free or at a discount. Airbnb is urging those that don’t have any available space to donate money to support housing efforts.

While access to housing is essential, many refugees will need to find jobs in their new countries to become financially independent.

Texas Medical Technology, a supplier and distributor of medical equipment, said it plans to hire 100 Afghan refugees within a year at a 144,000-square-foot manufacturing facility in Houston.

It hopes to have employed 10 Afghan refugees by the end of the month.

Free calls to Afghanistan

Then there’s keeping in contact with friends and family who are still in Afghanistan, which will be of vital importance to some in the immediate future.

Verizon on Tuesday said it plans to waive charges for calls from its consumer, business and residential landline customers to Afghanistan up until Sep. 6.

“During this time of need, customers need to stay connected with loved ones in Afghanistan,” said Ronan Dunne, executive vice president and CEO of Verizon Consumer Group for Verizon. “Waiving these kinds of calling charges will help them focus on what matters: communicating with family and friends.”

The telco is also inviting customers to donate $10 to the International Rescue Committee by texting RESCUE to 25383.

Mental health support

The mental health toll on Afghan refugees could be huge.

Hims & Hers, a telehealth platform that connects people to licensed healthcare professionals, said Wednesday that it is planning to do 10,000 mental health calls with Afghan refugees.

“With a mission to provide access to high-quality, convenient and affordable medical care and personalized treatment plans and solutions, we feel a moral responsibility to act — and fast,” the company said in a blog post on the Hims & Hers website.

Dental kits

Byte said it is planning to donate at least 25,000 oral care kits to Afghan refugees being resettled in the U.S. and elsewhere. Neeraj Gunsagar, the company’s CEO, said he believes it’s a moral obligation and in the national interest of the U.S. to help the refugees in this crisis.

Instead of offering direct support, some firms are donating money to charities. Discount retailer Walmart, for example, is donating $1 million to groups helping Afghan refugees in the U.S. through its philanthropic arm.

Thousands are still trying to flee Afghanistan ahead of President Joe Biden’s Aug. 31 deadline, and there are concerns many who want to leave the country won’t be able to.

The Pentagon on Sunday said it called up 18 civilian aircraft from United Airlines, American Airlines and Delta Air Lines, among others, to help carry those stationed at temporary locations after they landed on flights from Afghanistan.

 

Categories
World News

Largest Instructor’s Union Throws Help Behind Vaccination or Testing

The nation’s largest teachers’ union on Thursday offered its support to policies that would require all teachers to get vaccinated against Covid or submit to regular testing.

It is the latest in a rapid series of shifts that could make widespread vaccine requirements for teachers more likely as the highly contagious Delta variant spreads in the United States.

“It is clear that the vaccination of those eligible is one of the most effective ways to keep schools safe,” Becky Pringle, president of the National Education Association, said in a statement.

The announcement comes after Randi Weingarten, the powerful leader of the American Federation of Teachers, another major education union, signaled her strongest support yet for vaccine mandates on Sunday.

Ms. Pringle left open the possibility that teachers who are not vaccinated could receive regular testing instead, and added that local “employee input, including collective bargaining where applicable, is critical.”

Her union’s support for certain requirements is notable because it represents about three million members across the country, including in many rural and suburban districts where adults are less likely to be vaccinated. Overall, the union said, nearly 90 percent of its members report being fully vaccinated.

Still, any decision to require vaccination for teachers is likely to come at the local or state level. And even with their growing support, teachers’ unions have maintained that their local chapters should negotiate details.

“We believe that such vaccine requirements and accommodations are an appropriate, responsible, and necessary step,” Ms. Pringle said on Thursday. She added that “educators must have a voice in how vaccine requirements are implemented.”

California has ordered all teachers and staff members to provide proof of vaccination or face weekly testing, an order that applies to both public and private schools. Hawaii is requiring all state and county employees to be vaccinated or be tested, including public-school teachers. And Denver has said that city employees, including public school teachers, must be fully vaccinated by Sept. 30.

Categories
World News

Tidal energy undertaking in Canada secures assist of Japanese companies

Laszlo Podor | Moment | Getty Images

Two Japanese companies have entered into a joint development agreement with Ireland-based DP Energy to work on the initial stages of a tidal energy project in Canada.

In statements released earlier this week, Chubu Electric Power and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, or “K” Line, said the agreement related to the Uisce Tapa Tidal Energy project. The development is located at the Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy in the Bay of Fundy, a bay between the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

Both Chubu Electric Power and “K” Line called it “the first tidal power project that a Japanese company will participate in overseas”.

According to DP Energy, the first phase of Uisce Tapa – Irish for “fast water” – revolves around three 1.5 megawatt turbines. The second aims to increase the capacity of the project to 9 MW.

Uisce Tapa is backed by a 15-year power purchase agreement with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, which amounts to Canadian dollars 530 (approximately $ 422) per megawatt hour. It also benefits from a grant of approximately $ 30 million Canadian dollars from Natural Resources Canada.

In its announcement on Wednesday, DP Energy described the Bay of Fundy as “home to some of the highest tides in the world”. At the highest surface speed, the tidal currents are “capable of exceeding 10 knots” or 5 meters per second, he added.

Fisheries and Oceans Canada said the project is being considered for approval by Chubu Electric Power and “K” Line. If everything goes according to plan, the first turbine would go into operation in 2023, followed by two more in 2026.

The news comes the same week that tidal energy company Nova Innovation said it was able to move ahead with a project focused on increasing the production of tidal turbines after receiving funding from the Scottish government.

The £ 2 million ($ 2.77 million) funding increase announced on Thursday will be used to support the Volume Manufacturing and Logistics for Tidal Energy project, also known as VOLT.

According to Nova, VOLT will “develop the first European assembly line for the mass production of tidal turbines” and also “test innovative techniques and tools to ship, deploy and monitor turbines around the world”.

Last week, another company, Orbital Marine Power, announced that its O2 turbine had started producing electricity on-grid at the European Marine Energy Center in Orkney, an archipelago north of mainland Scotland.

The 2 megawatt O2 is known as the “strongest tidal turbine in the world”, weighs 680 tons and is 74 meters long.

Categories
Politics

U.S. launched in a single day airstrikes on the Taliban to assist Afghan forces

US Marines from Charlie 1/1 of the 15th MEU (Marine Expeditionary Unit) fill sandbags around their light mortar position at the front of a US Marine Corps base, near a cardboard sign reminding everyone that Taliban troops are everywhere and anywhere in the south could be Afghanistan December 1, 2001.

Jim Hollander | Reuters

WASHINGTON – The United States launched overnight air strikes against the Taliban in Afghanistan, a move reflecting Washington’s intentions to continue to provide fighter jets to the Afghan forces until the US forces withdraw next month.

Pentagon spokesman John Kirby refused to provide any further details about the attacks on Thursday, including the type of aircraft used.

The attacks are the first to become known since Army General Scott Miller, America’s last four-star commander to serve in Afghanistan, stepped down and returned to the United States.

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin (left) and Joint Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley greet Gen. Austin S. Miller, former U.S. Supreme Commander in Afghanistan, upon his return to Andrews Air Force Base, July 14, 2021.

Alex Brandon | Reuters

In April, President Joe Biden ordered the full withdrawal of approximately 3,000 US soldiers from Afghanistan by September 11, effectively ending America’s longest war. Last week, Biden gave an updated schedule, saying the U.S. military mission in Afghanistan will end on August 31st.

“We didn’t go to Afghanistan to build a nation,” said Biden. “It is up to the Afghans to decide the future of their country.”

At the Pentagon, the country’s top military officer told reporters on Wednesday that the US has completed more than 95% of the Herculean task of withdrawing from Afghanistan.

“The sheer volume of movement on this operation was exceptional,” said General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of the US Army, adding that the US had carried out more than 980 air transports of cargo in less than three months.

“In addition, all military bases outside of Kabul were completely handed over to the Afghan Ministry of Defense and the Afghan security forces.”

Last week the White House announced it would begin evacuation flights this month for Afghan nationals and their families who supported U.S. and NATO coalition forces during the longest American war.

Categories
Health

Serving to Drug Customers Survive, Not Abstain: ‘Hurt Discount’ Beneficial properties Federal Help

GREENSBORO, NC – The skinny young man quietly walked into the room while waiting for the free supplies to help keep him from dying: sterile water and a stove to dissolve illegal drugs; clean syringes; Alcohol swabs to prevent infection; and naloxone, a drug that can reverse overdoses. A sign on the wall – “We stand to love drug users for who they are” – felt like a hug.

It was the first day on which the contact point in a residential area here opened its doors since it was closed due to the coronavirus in spring 2020. “I am very happy that you have all opened again,” the man, whose first name is Jordan, said a volunteer who handed him a full paper bag while heavy metal music played over a loudspeaker in the background. He asked for extra naloxone for friends in his rural county, an hour away, where it was in short supply during the pandemic.

The death toll from overdose rose nearly 30 percent to more than 90,000 in the twelve months that ended in November, according to preliminary federal data released earlier this month – suggesting 2020 beat recent records for such deaths Has. The astounding surge during the pandemic is due to many factors including widespread job losses and displacement; decreased access to addiction treatment and medical care; and an illicit drug supply that became even more dangerous after the country was closed.

But the forced isolation for people struggling with addiction and other mental health issues is possibly one of the greatest. Now, with the nation reopening, the Biden government supports the controversial approach the center is taking here known as harm reduction. Rather than giving drug users abstinence, the main goal is to reduce their risk of dying or developing infectious diseases like HIV by providing them with sterile equipment, tools to check their drugs for fentanyl and other deadly substances, or even a safe place to nap Will be provided .

Such programs have long been under attack to facilitate drug use, but President Biden has made expanding harm reduction efforts one of his drug policy priorities – the first president to do so. The American Rescue Act earmarked $ 30 million specifically for evidence-based harm reduction services, the first time Congress has raised funds specifically for that purpose. Funding, while modest, is a victory for the programs, both symbolically and practically, as they often run on tight budgets.

“It’s a tremendous signal to recognize that not everyone who uses drugs is ready for treatment,” said Daliah Heller, director of drug-use initiatives at Vital Strategies, a global health organization. “Harm reduction programs say, ‘Okay, you do drugs. How can we help you stay safe and healthy and alive in the first place? ‘”

Although some programs like this one, run by the North Carolina Survivors Union, managed to keep holding some supplies – handing them through windows, offering roadside collection, or even mailing them – practically all of them stopped during the pandemic To invite drug users. Many customers, like Jordan, stopped coming and lost a trustworthy safety net.

Some former Greensboro Center regulars have died or disappeared. Many lost their homes or jobs. At the same time, the center was flooded with new customers and is now having problems keeping enough supplies on hand.

“The struggle that people are having right now, unrecognized and unanswered, is really difficult,” said Louise Vincent, Executive Director of the Survivors Union.

Yet many elected officials and communities continue to refuse to provide people with medication for drug use, including recently introduced test strips to screen drugs for the presence of illegally manufactured fentanyl, which appears in most overdose deaths. Some also say that syringes from harm reduction programs litter the neighborhoods or that the programs lead to an increase in crime. Researchers deny both claims.

West Virginia has just passed law making syringe service programs very difficult to operate, despite an increase in HIV cases from intravenous drug use. The North Carolina Legislature pondered a similar proposal this spring, and elected officials in Scott County, Indiana, whose syringe exchanges helped contain a major HIV outbreak six years ago, voted this month to end it. Mike Jones, a local commissioner who voted to end the program, said at the time that he feared the syringes being distributed could contribute to overdose deaths.

“I know people who are alcoholics and I don’t buy them a bottle of whiskey,” he said. “And I know people who want to kill themselves and I won’t buy them a bullet for their gun.”

Many harm reduction programs are carried out by people who have previously or are still using drugs, and their own struggles with addiction, mental illness, or other health problems have also flared up during the pandemic. In Baltimore, Boston, New York and elsewhere, beloved movement leaders themselves have died of overdoses, chronic health problems, and other causes in the past year. Her death left gaps in efforts to continue providing services.

Ms. Vincent, whose own opioid addiction stemmed from a long battle with bipolar disorder, made a brief return to illicit drug use this spring. She was keen to prevent withdrawal, she said after trying unsuccessfully to switch from methadone to another anti-craving drug, buprenorphine. She later learned that the small amount of fentanyl she was using was mixed with xylazine – an animal sedative that can cause weeping ulcers on the skin. She ended up in the hospital with her hemoglobin level so low that she needed a blood transfusion.

At the start of the pandemic, Ms. Vincent said street drug prices soared. Then drugs that were sold as heroin, methamphetamine, or cocaine were trimmed with unknown additives. Fentanyl was ubiquitous – including increasingly in counterfeit pills sold as prescription pain relievers or anti-anxiety drugs. But also substances like xylazine, which appears in illegal drugs from Philadelphia to Saskatchewan.

“It’s just poison,” said Ms. Vincent, who is being treated with methadone again. “The drug supply is like nothing we’ve seen before.”

On the afternoon of the center’s reopening, a young woman asked for a refresher on how to inject naloxone and if Ms. Vincent could explain what a meth overdose looks like. An older man asked if there was anything to eat besides clean syringes; a volunteer put a pastry in the microwave for him.

In addition to running the program here, Ms. Vincent is the executive director of the National Urban Survivors Union, a larger nonprofit, promoting harm reduction services across the country. In 2016, her 19-year-old daughter died of a heroin overdose while she was in an inpatient treatment center where naloxone was not available, she said.

Naloxone is more common now, but Ms. Vincent wants another life-saving tool to be disseminated: drug control programs that would allow people to find out exactly what substances are in illicit drugs before using them. Such programs exist legally in other countries including Canada, the Netherlands and New Zealand. Another type of harm reduction program used in other countries – where people use illicit drugs under medical supervision if they overdose – remains illegal here after a group trying to start one in Philadelphia so far lost in court.

“We cWe could have a real-time monitoring system instead of waiting for death reports from the coroner, ”Ms. Vincent said. “It would change the game, wouldn’t it?”

She found the xylazine in the drugs she recently took with a device called a Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer that a donor gave to her group this year. It can determine which substances contain samples of street drugs in minutes.

Jordan, who is 23 years old, had traveled from Stokes County, near the Virginia border, where the pre-pandemic overdose rate was nearly double the national average. His cousin, he said, was hospitalized weeks earlier after overdosing on a “really bad batch” of fentanyl that were found to contain traces of heavy metals in tests.

“At least 50 people in my area were rescued from here by Narcan,” he said, picking up several boxes of 10 vials of the injectable form of the antidote. “Even my grandmother knows how to manage it.”

Many harm reduction programs, including this one, help or sometimes even offer people to put people on drug treatment. But Jordan is one of the many drug users who are not interested in this path, at least for the moment. The next programs are in Greensboro or Winston-Salem, each a healthy drive from home. And treating food cravings like buprenorphine or methadone, which have been shown to save lives, “doesn’t really work for me,” he said.

The county that includes Greensboro, North Carolina’s third largest city, had 140 fatal overdoses last year, up from 111 the year before. The numbers don’t include the people who died from infections caused by injecting drugs, including the fiancée of a woman who walked into the center at dusk on the day of the reopening and called out to Ms. Vincent, “Where’s Louise?”

She met Ms. Vincent when they were both patients in a methadone clinic six years ago and regularly came to the center for injections and naloxone. She and her fiancé had tried to stop drug use during the pandemic, unnerved by the strange new adulterants that were showing up in the stash. But her fiancé started developing a high fever last December and was admitted to a hospital intensive care unit, seriously ill with endocarditis, a heart valve infection that can result from injecting medication. He died just before Christmas.

“Do you all have a meeting tonight?” Asked Ms. Vincent, referring to the self-help groups the center held several times a week before the pandemic.

“You’ll start again soon,” Mrs. Vincent assured her. “Being connected is much more important than any of us thought.”

Categories
Politics

Biden reiterates assist for bipartisan infrastructure plan, didn’t threaten veto

President Joe Biden on Saturday said he doesn’t plan to veto a bipartisan infrastructure bill if it comes without a reconciliation package, walking back a declaration last week that he would refuse to sign it unless the two bills came in tandem.

The comment angered some Republican lawmakers, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, who said the president was threatening to veto the bipartisan deal in remarks on the Senate floor on Thursday.

“That statement understandably upset some Republicans, who do not see the two plans as linked,” the president said in a statement.

“My comments also created the impression that I was issuing a veto threat on the very plan I had just agreed to, which was certainly not my intent,” the president said.

A bipartisan group of lawmakers closed a deal on an infrastructure initiative Thursday following weeks of negotiations to craft a package that could get through Congress with Republican and Democratic support. The framework will include $579 billion in new spending to improve the country’s roads, bridges and broadband.

The second bill would include funding for Democrat-backed issues like climate change, childcare, health care and education, issues that administration officials have called “human infrastructure.” It would be passed through a Senate process called reconciliation, which doesn’t require Republican votes.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on Thursday morning said the House would not take up either piece of legislation until both are passed through the Senate. Democrats can’t lose a single vote on a reconciliation bill in the evenly split chamber.

Biden said he will ask Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., to schedule the infrastructure plan and the reconciliation bill for action in the Senate and expects them both to go to the House.

“Ultimately, I am confident that Congress will get both to my desk, so I can sign each bill promptly,” Biden said.

Read the president’s full statement here:

On Thursday, I reached a historic agreement with a bipartisan group of Senators on a $1.2 trillion plan to transform our physical infrastructure. The plan would make the largest investment in infrastructure in history, the biggest investment in rail since the creation of Amtrak, and the largest investment in transit ever. It would fix roads and bridges, make critical investments in our clean energy future, and help this country compete with China and other economic rivals. It would replace lead water pipes in our schools and houses, and connect every American to high-speed internet. It would create millions of high-paying jobs that could not be outsourced.

In the days since, the primary focus in Washington has not been about the Plan’s scope, scale or provisions—but rather, how it relates to other legislation before Congress: my American Families Plan. The American Families Plan—which would make historic investments in education, health care, child care, and tax cuts for families, coupled with other investments in care for our seniors, housing, and clean energy—has broad support with the American people, but not among Republicans in Congress.

I have been clear from the start that it was my hope that the infrastructure plan could be one that Democrats and Republicans would work on together, while I would seek to pass my Families Plan and other provisions through the process known as reconciliation. There has been no doubt or ambiguity about my intention to proceed this way.

At a press conference after announcing the bipartisan agreement, I indicated that I would refuse to sign the infrastructure bill if it was sent to me without my Families Plan and other priorities, including clean energy. That statement understandably upset some Republicans, who do not see the two plans as linked; they are hoping to defeat my Families Plan—and do not want their support for the infrastructure plan to be seen as aiding passage of the Families Plan. 

My comments also created the impression that I was issuing a veto threat on the very plan I had just agreed to, which was certainly not my intent. So to be clear: our bipartisan agreement does not preclude Republicans from attempting to defeat my Families Plan; likewise, they should have no objections to my devoted efforts to pass that Families Plan and other proposals in tandem. We will let the American people—and the Congress—decide. 

The bottom line is this: I gave my word to support the Infrastructure Plan, and that’s what I intend to do. I intend to pursue the passage of that plan, which Democrats and Republicans agreed to on Thursday, with vigor. It would be good for the economy, good for our country, good for our people. I fully stand behind it without reservation or hesitation. 

Some other Democrats have said they might oppose the Infrastructure Plan because it omits items they think are important: that is a mistake, in my view. Some Republicans now say that they might oppose the infrastructure plan because I am also trying to pass the American Families Plan: that is also a mistake, in my view. I intend to work hard to get both of them passed, because our country needs both—and I ran a winning campaign for President that promised to deliver on both. No one should be surprised that that is precisely what I am doing. 

I will ask Leader Schumer to schedule both the infrastructure plan and the reconciliation bill for action in the Senate. I expect both to go to the House, where I will work with Speaker Pelosi on the path forward after Senate action. Ultimately, I am confident that Congress will get both to my desk, so I can sign each bill promptly.

Categories
Politics

Republican senators help bipartisan plan

Senator Mitt Romney, a Republican from Utah, arrives for lunch on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on Wednesday, June 16, 2021.

Sarah Silberner | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Eleven Republican Senators support a bipartisan infrastructure framework, enough for a possible bill to get through the Chamber if all skeptical Democrats support it.

In a statement Wednesday, 21 Democratic and GOP senators backed the roughly $ 1 trillion proposal that would not impose taxes on corporations or wealthy individuals. The plan would reshape transportation, broadband, and water, but would fail to meet many Democrats’ goals for investing in clean energy and social programs.

“We look forward to working with our Republican and Democratic counterparts to develop laws based on this framework to address America’s critical infrastructure challenges,” the senators said in a statement.

The proposal serves as the last sustained effort to reach a bipartisan infrastructure deal before the Democrats pass laws themselves. A smaller bipartisan group of 10 senators who drafted the plan have tried to gain support on Capitol Hill but have not yet received the blessings of congressional leaders or the White House.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

A handful of Senate liberals have threatened to vote against the bipartisan deal, which they believe does not do enough to tackle climate change or income inequality. If Democrats reject the plan, it would have to have more than 10 Republicans backing it for it to reach the 60-vote threshold to pass a bill in the Senate.

Some Democrats have suggested that their party could approve a physical infrastructure plan with Republican backing if skeptics were given assurances that their priorities would be addressed later. The Democrats could then move to balancing the budget themselves to make bigger investments in child and elderly care, green energy, education and health care.

The Democrats must weigh the concerns of both sides of their party. The most conservative Democrat in the Senate, Joe Manchin from West Virginia, has stressed that he wants to pass an infrastructure law with GOP votes.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Democrats would begin drafting a budget resolution on Wednesday, even if bipartisan talks continue. He said a proposal that includes social and climate programs included in President Joe Biden’s American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan “is under Senate consideration even if it does not have bipartisan support.”

“There are many points to discuss, but one subject is not up for debate: I will instruct Members to ensure that any budgetary decision puts the United States on the right track to reduce carbon emissions to an extent commensurate with the climate crisis.” said Schumer of New York, said earlier Wednesday.

Biden left Geneva, Switzerland after meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday and said he had not seen the details of the bipartisan plan. However, he noted that his chief of staff, Ron Klain, believes there is “some room” for a deal with the Republicans.

White House advisers met on Wednesday with the five Democratic senators negotiating the proposal. In a statement to NBC News after the meeting, White House spokesman Andrew Bates said officials “found it productive and encouraging.”

“They look forward to briefing the president on his return to the White House tomorrow and continuing to consult with senators and representatives on the way forward,” he said.

Paying for the infrastructure plan could be an issue. Republicans have insisted they will not touch their 2017 tax bill, which lowered the corporate tax rate to 21%. Biden wants to raise corporate tax to at least 25%.

The president has also promised not to raise taxes for those earning less than $ 400,000 a year. One potential source of revenue in the bipartisan plan – tying the gas tax to inflation – could effectively break its promise.

The Republicans who signed the statement on Wednesday are Sens. Richard Burr of North Carolina; Bill Cassidy of Louisiana; Susan Collins, Maine; Lindsey Graham from South Carolina; Lisa Murkowski from Alaska; Rob Portman from Ohio; Mitt Romney from Utah; Mike Rounds from South Dakota; Thom Tillis from North Carolina, Todd Young from Indiana, and Jerry Moran from Kansas.

The Democrats who have joined them are Sens. Chris Coons of Delaware; Maggie Hassan from New Hampshire; John Hickenlooper, Colorado; Mark Kelly from Arizona; Joe Manchin from West Virginia; Jeanne Shaheen from New Hampshire; Kyrsten Sinema from Arizona and Mark Warner from Virginia. Senator Angus King, an independent Maine working with the Democrats, also signed the statement.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Business

Biden’s Proposals Intention to Give Sturdier Assist to the Center Class

Skeptics have warned of government overreach and the risk that deficit spending could trigger inflation, but Mr Biden and his team of economic advisors have adopted the approach nonetheless.

“It’s time for the economy to grow from the bottom towards the middle,” Biden said in his speech to a joint congressional session last week, an indication of the idea that wealth does not flow down from the rich, but flows away from an educated and well-educated person paid middle class.

He underscored the point by highlighting workers as the dynamo that drives the middle class.

“Wall Street didn’t build this country,” he said. “The middle class built the country up. And the unions built the middle class. “

Of course, the economy that pushed millions of post-war families into the middle class was very different from the present one. Manufacturing, construction and mining jobs, formerly seen as the backbone of the workforce, have declined – as have unions, which fought aggressively for better wages and benefits. Currently, only 1 in 10 workers are union members, while around 80 percent of jobs in the US are in the service sector.

And it is expected that these types of jobs in healthcare, education, childcare, disabled and elderly care will continue to grow at the fastest pace.

However, most of them do not pay middle-income wages. That doesn’t necessarily reflect their worth in an open market. Salaries for teachers, hospital workers, lab technicians, child minders, and nursing home workers are largely set by the government, which collects taxpayers’ money to pay their salaries and sets reimbursement rates for Medicare and other programs.

They are also jobs that are held by significant numbers of women, African Americans, Latinos, and Asians.