Categories
Business

China Needed to Present Off Its Vaccines. It’s Backfiring.

China’s coronavirus vaccines were supposed to deliver a geopolitical win that showcased the country’s scientific prowess and generosity. Instead, in some places, they have set off a backlash.

Officials in Brazil and Turkey have complained that Chinese companies have been slow to ship the doses and ingredients. Disclosures about the Chinese vaccines has been slow and spotty. The few announcements that have trickled out suggest that China’s vaccines, while considered effective, cannot stop the virus as well as those developed by Pfizer and Moderna, the American drugmakers.

In the Philippines, some lawmakers have criticized the government’s decision to purchase a vaccine made by a Chinese company called Sinovac. Officials in Malaysia and Singapore, which both ordered doses from Sinovac, have had to reassure their citizens that they would approve a vaccine only if it has been proven safe and effective.

“Right now, I would not take any Chinese vaccine because there’s insufficient data,” said Bilahari Kausikan, an influential former official at Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. He added that he would consider it only with “a proper report.”

At least 24 countries, most of them low and middle income, signed deals with the Chinese vaccine companies because they offered access at a time when richer nations had claimed most of the doses made by Pfizer and Moderna. But the delays in getting the Chinese vaccines and the fact that the vaccines are less effective mean that those countries may take longer to vanquish the virus.

Beijing officials who had hoped the vaccines would burnish China’s global reputation are now on the defensive. State media, meanwhile, has started a misinformation campaign against the American vaccines, questioning the safety of the Pfizer and Moderna shots and promoting the Chinese vaccines as a better alternative. They have also distributed online videos that have been shared by the anti-vaccine movement in the United States.

Liu Xin, an anchor with CGTN, the state broadcaster, asked on Twitter why the foreign media has failed to “follow up” on the deaths of people in Germany who have taken one vaccine — though scientists have said the people were already seriously ill. Ms. Liu’s tweet was shared by Zhao Lijian, a top spokesman at China’s foreign ministry.

George Gao, the head of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, has questioned the safety of the American vaccines because their developers used new techniques rather than the traditional method embraced by Chinese makers.

China had hoped its vaccines would prove it had become a scientific and diplomatic powerhouse. It remains on par with the United States in the number of vaccines approved for emergency use or in late stage trials. Sinopharm, a state-owned vaccine maker, and Sinovac have said they can produce up to a combined two billion doses this year, making them essential to the global fight against the coronavirus.

Unlike the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, their doses can be kept at refrigerated temperatures and are more easily transported, making them appealing to the developing world. They have been doled out as aid to countries like Pakistan and the Philippines.

China’s campaign has been plagued with doubts, however. Many people have memories of the country’s vaccine scandals. Several governments remain angry about Beijing’s lack of openness about the virus in the early days of the pandemic. Its efforts at the start of last year to distribute masks and protective equipment to the West came under fire amid reports of shoddy quality and the demands by Chinese officials for public thanks.

A YouGov survey this month of roughly 19,000 people in 17 countries and regions showed that most were distrustful of a Covid-19 vaccine made in China. The misinformation campaign surrounding Western vaccines could further undermine its image.

The delays in shipments to places like Brazil and Turkey have been the latest hitch.

In Turkey, the government initially promised that 10 million doses of the Sinovac vaccine would arrive in December. Only three million did in early January, according to Fahrettin Koca, Turkey’s health minister. He did not explain the reason for the shortfall, which has been criticized by opposition politicians. The remaining doses finally arrived on Monday, according to Anadolu, Turkey’s state-run news agency.

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine?

While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.

When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated?

Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.

If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask?

Yes, but not forever. The two vaccines that will potentially get authorized this month clearly protect people from getting sick with Covid-19. But the clinical trials that delivered these results were not designed to determine whether vaccinated people could still spread the coronavirus without developing symptoms. That remains a possibility. We know that people who are naturally infected by the coronavirus can spread it while they’re not experiencing any cough or other symptoms. Researchers will be intensely studying this question as the vaccines roll out. In the meantime, even vaccinated people will need to think of themselves as possible spreaders.

Will it hurt? What are the side effects?

The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection won’t be any different from ones you’ve gotten before. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. But some of them have felt short-lived discomfort, including aches and flu-like symptoms that typically last a day. It’s possible that people may need to plan to take a day off work or school after the second shot. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign: they are the result of your own immune system encountering the vaccine and mounting a potent response that will provide long-lasting immunity.

Will mRNA vaccines change my genes?

No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

In a statement, China’s foreign ministry cited its needs at home, where the coronavirus has re-emerged.

“Currently, China’s domestic vaccine demand is huge,” it said. “While meeting domestic demand, we are overcoming difficulties, thinking and trying ways to develop international vaccine cooperation with other countries, especially developing countries in different ways, and providing support and assistance according to their needs and within our capacity.”

The sporadic outbreaks could also hinder production. Sinovac, which declined to comment, said on Friday online that it was looking for workers for a Beijing-area facility where an outbreak had frightened off potential employees.

Countries like Turkey and Brazil are rolling out their immunization programs with a Sinovac vaccine because Western companies cannot deliver as quickly. But Brazil’s efforts have been delayed as well. Eduardo Pazuello, the country’s health minister, said China is not acting fast enough with the documents needed to export raw materials to Brazil.

“We are making strong moves at the diplomatic level to find where that resistance is and solve the problem,” Mr. Pazuello told a news conference last Sunday.

On Wednesday, Rodrigo Maia, Brazil’s speaker of the house, told reporters that he had met the Chinese ambassador to Brazil, who “made it clear that there is no political obstacle, that it was a technical process that was delayed a little.”

Other vaccines are beginning to fill the gap. Brazil’s health ministry announced on Thursday that a previously delayed shipment of two million doses of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine would be arriving the next day from India.

The world was also caught off guard by the disclosure that the Sinovac vaccine may not be as effective as previously thought. Earlier, officials in Turkey said trials there showed the vaccine has a 91 percent efficacy rate. In Indonesia, it was 68 percent. In Brazil, researchers initially said its efficacy was 78 percent.

Then, on Jan. 12, scientists said it had an efficacy rate of just over 50 percent, once people who experienced mild symptoms were included. That level is a hair above the threshold set by the World Health Organization to consider a vaccine effective. In a news conference last week, Sinovac’s chief executive officer, Yin Weidong, reiterated that the vaccine is 100 percent effective in preventing severe cases. He said the lower efficacy rate was because the trial was focused on health care workers, who had a higher propensity of contracting Covid-19 than the general population.

Jair Bolsonaro, Brazil’s president and a critic of both China and its Covid-19 vaccines, pounced on the data. On Jan. 13, he mocked the vaccine’s efficacy rate, asking a supporter: “Is that 50 percent good?”

To be sure, the Chinese vaccines have a big appeal to many countries. More than 40 countries have expressed an interest in importing Chinese vaccines, according to China’s foreign ministry. Several world leaders, including President Reccep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey and President Joko Widodo of Indonesia, have gotten a Sinovac vaccine.

But the spotty and inconsistent disclosures about the vaccines remain a problem. In the case of Sinopharm, the company said a vaccine candidate made by its Beijing Institute of Biological Products arm had an efficacy rate of 79 percent, but it did not disclose crucial details. Sinopharm didn’t respond to a request for comment.

In Hong Kong, a special administration region of China that has ordered 7.5 million doses of the Sinovac vaccine, officials have not received an application for emergency distribution nor any data from the Chinese company.

“Whether it is because they are not making enough or if they have no plans to send the vaccines to Hong Kong yet, I don’t know,” said Dr. Lau Chak Sing, who heads a Hong Kong government advisory panel on Covid-19 vaccines.

Data disclosure has also been an issue in the Philippines, which has secured 25 million Sinovac vaccine doses. Risa Hontiveros, an opposition lawmaker, said President Rodrigo Duterte’s administration “continues to cram their preference for Chinese-made vaccines down the public’s throat, without emergency use approval and with inconsistent data.”

Leila de Lima, a senator and opposition leader who is in prison, expressed anger that the government is paying $61 a dose, more than double what Sinovac’s partner in Indonesia is paying. The presidential palace said that price was overstated but it couldn’t divulge the real ones because of a confidentiality agreement.

Despite the uncertainty, many people may have little choice.

“I’ll have my jab,” said Kayihan Pala, a member of the Turkey Medical Association’s Covid-19 monitoring board. “I am waiting my turn, because there is no other option.”

Letícia Casado, Tiffany May, Elsie Chen and Jason Gutierrez contributed reporting.

Categories
Business

Amazon’s ‘Tandav’ Present Angers India’s Hindu Nationalists

NEW DELHI – Bollywood has once again fallen into the crosshairs of India’s nationalist Hindu ruling party – and major western streaming services like Amazon and Netflix are increasingly in the middle.

At the weekend, two separate criminal charges were filed with the police against the makers of “Tandav”, a new web series with a large budget on Amazon. The fast-paced political drama, which seems to borrow heavily from India’s political scene, could get awkwardly close to current events and the country’s major controversies.

The complainants, which include a politician from the ruling Bharatiya Janata party, have insisted that the government pull the series off the air or remove key scenes. Among other things, they accused the series of not respecting Hindu gods, disparaging members of individual castes and defiling the office of prime minister.

If the police believe the complaints are well founded, Amazon and the show’s organizers could be brought to a criminal court.

Ali Abbas Zafar, the director of “Tandav”, published a statement on his Instagram account on Monday that the show “is a fiction and any resemblance to actions, people and events is purely coincidental.” However, the statement states that the cast and crew “take note of the concerns expressed by the people and apologize unconditionally if it has inadvertently hurt the feelings of others.”

Officials at Amazon have refused to comment.

Show defenders say these complaints are excuses. The pressure on Amazon to drop the series is part of an increasingly intolerant atmosphere in India that even affects Bollywood, India’s film and entertainment industry. Actors, comedians, producers, artists, and anyone who dares even indirectly question the government can put their careers at risk, they say.

“If you take a stand, you have to pay a price,” said Sushant Singh, a Bollywood actor who has openly fought against several government policies. “You don’t even get surprised these days. And you don’t know how to react anymore. “

These attitudes complicate the ambitions of both Bollywood studios and large corporations to reach a large Indian audience with their laptops and smartphones. Like the Hollywood film industry, Bollywood has increasingly turned to streaming as pandemic restrictions hit the theater business.

Global companies are helping to provide the platforms for Indian viewers. Big streaming services like Amazon, Netflix and Hotstar, which are owned by Disney, have invested heavily in a country where they see great potential for growth.

But at times they got caught in the increasingly restrictive political environment in India.

Two months ago, an on-screen kiss put Netflix in a similar situation. Hindu nationalists were outraged that a series on Netflix showed a Hindu woman kissing a Muslim man in front of a Hindu temple – a scene in which Hindu nationalists felt several taboos were violated. The Hindu nationalists have urged authorities to investigate Netflix and called for a boycott. No charges were filed.

The real objection to “Tandav” may simply be that it is too real. The opening episode looks almost like a newsreel. It ranges from peasant protests to student protests to police killings – all events that have taken place in recent months under the government of Narendra Modi, India’s nationalist Hindu prime minister.

It does not shy away from sensitive topics. In one scene, a fictionalized Indian prime minister belittles a lower-caste politician and touches on the sensitive issue of the ancient Hindu social system.

Even the title of the episode is provocative. It’s called “dictator”.

“They are using abusive language and trying to defame the post of prime minister, which clearly points to our current prime minister,” said Ram Kadam, a BJP lawmaker who filed one of the criminal charges.

The authorities in Uttar Pradesh state, where many police officers were recently killed and led by one of the closest allies of Mr. Modi, a Hindu monk who has become prime minister, appear particularly offended. You said in a file with the local police that the Amazon series portrayed the post of prime minister “in a very indecent way.” On Monday, state officials warned that the filmmakers should “prepare for the arrest”.

In recent months, Mr. Modi’s party officials have stepped up pressure on some of the country’s most successful artists. Critics see this pressure as an attempt to suppress views that challenge the nationalist ideology of Hindus, who seek to turn India into an open Hindu state and marginalize non-Hindu minorities.

Drug authorities have persecuted leading actors on marijuana possession charges. A popular comedian was recently jailed for allegedly joking about Mr Modi’s right-wing husband, Amit Shah, despite the fact that authorities have failed to provide evidence that the comedian said what they claimed.

The pressure extends to other areas of life. An Indian airline pilot and distinguished military veteran was fired this month after tweeted that the prime minister was “an idiot”.

Indian cinema tends to be culturally conservative, with sex scenes and profanity being discouraged by Indian censorship. Until recently, however, online content in India fell into a gray area.

In November, the Indian government ruled that the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, currently headed by Prakash Javadekar, a close ally of Mr. Modi, has the power to regulate online content.

Hindu nationalists are now calling on the government to intervene.

Online broadcasts are “full of sex, violence, drugs, abuse, hatred and vulgarity,” wrote Manoj Kotak, a BJP lawmaker, recently in a letter to Mr. Javadekar. He concluded his letter by asking the minister to set up a regulator for online content and “in the meantime to ban the controversial web series ‘Tandav'”.

Categories
Business

Unemployment Claims Present Influence of Layoffs as Virus Surges

The surge in coronavirus cases is rippling through the economy, forcing employers to lay off workers with an extraordinarily high layoff rate, even as new vaccines and the possibility of further government aid offer hope for the next year.

The number of Americans filing initial unemployment insurance claims remained high last week, the Department of Labor reported Thursday. After falling earlier in the fall, claims have risen, dwarfing the pace of past recessions.

Consumer caution, coupled with new restrictions on business activities such as indoor restaurants, has hit the hotel, lodging, airline and other service industries. The debut of a coronavirus vaccine offers some prospect of relief, but until mass vaccination begins next year the economy will remain under pressure.

“Companies are closing, and as a result, job losses are increasing – and that is exactly what we feared we were going into the winter,” said Rubeela Farooqi, US chief economist at High Frequency Economics. “It will definitely be a challenging couple of months.”

The pace of retail sales has already slowed, as has overall economic growth. Few expect coronavirus cases to subside this winter and further drag on economic activity, but advances on a new relief law on Capitol Hill could ease the blow.

935,000 new state benefit claims were made last week, compared to 956,000 the previous week. Adjusted for seasonal fluctuations, last week’s value was 885,000, an increase of 23,000.

There have been 455,000 new applications for assistance from Pandemic Unemployment, a government-funded program for part-time workers, the self-employed, and other people who are normally not eligible for unemployment benefits. This sum, which was not seasonally adjusted, increased by 40,000 compared to the previous week.

The move to limit business and consumer activities by government agencies was evident in the new data. In Illinois, where indoor eating was banned on November 20, claims rose by over 35,000. In California, where restrictions went into effect December 3, new registrations rose by nearly 24,000.

As of late November, more than 20 million workers were receiving unemployment benefits under state or federal programs, according to data from the Department of Labor. Although the unemployment rate fell from 14.7 percent in April to 6.7 percent in November, the ongoing layoffs underscore the economic fragility of many Americans.

Economy & Economy

Updated

Apr. 17, 2020, 4:35 pm ET

“We’re not going in the right direction,” said Gregory Daco, chief US economist at Oxford Economics. “With the services expiring, it’s even more worrying.”

The pain in the labor market is particularly acute for the less skilled, whose jobs and finances are far more affected than those of wealthier Americans.

The S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrials and the Nasdaq Composite Index closed at record highs on Thursday and have completed a strong rally in recent weeks. The IPO was hot news and shaped thousands of paper millionaires in Silicon Valley and elsewhere.

The housing market has also been resilient, fueled by low interest rates that make mortgages more affordable as city dwellers flee to the suburbs.

Total wages and salaries have returned to pre-pandemic levels at $ 9.6 trillion a month after falling below $ 8.7 trillion in the depths of the spring recession. But the American share of the labor force remains well below a year ago, underscoring the deep hole the economy is slowly working its way out of.

Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress resumed talks Thursday on another pandemic relief bill that economists have warned is overdue. With no action taken, two key unemployed programs will expire this month – Pandemic Unemployment Assistance and Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation, which provide extra weeks of assistance after government benefits expire and cut payments to millions.

In addition to extending these programs, the $ 900 billion package is expected to include $ 600 stimulus payments to individuals, a $ 300 weekly unemployment benefit allowance, and rent and food aid.

The $ 2.2 trillion CARES bill, passed in March, has been credited with helping the economy weather the depths of lockdowns in many parts of the country last spring. But partisan battles in Washington have held up renewed federal support for months.

Economists have warned that without a new aid package from Washington, economic growth could stay flat in the first quarter of 2021. In addition, the abrupt end of unemployment benefits for millions could further weigh on consumer spending.

Data released on Wednesday showed retail sales declined 1.1 percent in November, a disappointing start to the crucial Christmas season. Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC Financial Services, expects economic growth to be weak for the next several months before accelerating later in 2021.

“Until we vaccinate many people, the economy will face a difficult test,” he said. “I don’t know if there will be a total decline or loss of jobs, but the pace of improvement will slow significantly.”

Categories
Business

Unemployment Claims Present Toll of Rising Covid Instances: Reside Updates

Here’s what you need to know:

Credit…Maddie McGarvey for The New York Times

Rising Covid-19 cases are taking a steep toll on economic activity, battering the labor market even as new vaccines offer a ray of hope for next year.

The number of Americans filing initial claims for unemployment insurance remained high last week, the Labor Department reported Thursday. After dropping earlier in the fall, claims have moved higher, and they remain at levels that dwarf the pace of past recessions.

There were 935,000 new claims for state benefits, compared with 956,000 the previous week, while 455,000 filed for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, a federally funded program for part-time workers, the self-employed and others ordinarily ineligible for jobless benefits.

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the number of new state claims was 885,000, an increase of 23,000 from the previous week.

Consumer caution, coupled with new restrictions on business activity like indoor dining, has pummeled the hospitality industry, lodging, airlines and other service businesses. The debut of a coronavirus vaccine this week offers the prospect of relief, but until mass inoculations begin next year, the economy will remain under pressure.

“Businesses are closing, and as a result, we are seeing job losses mount — and that’s exactly what we were fearful of going into the winter,” said Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics. “It’s going to be a challenging few months, no doubt.”

At the end of November, more than 20 million workers were collecting unemployment benefits under state or federal programs, Labor Department data indicates.

With the weakening economy as the backdrop, Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress continued talks on Wednesday on another pandemic relief bill, something that economists have warned is overdue. Without action, two key programs for unemployed workers will expire this month, cutting off benefits to millions.

“We are not moving in the right direction,” said Gregory Daco, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. “With the looming expiration of benefits, it’s even more worrisome.”

Data released on Wednesday showed a 1.1 percent drop in retail sales in November, a disappointing start to the crucial holiday season. Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC Financial Services, expects economic growth to be weak for the next few months before picking up later in 2021.

“Until we get a lot of people vaccinated, the economy will face a difficult test,” he said. “I don’t know if we will see an outright contraction or the loss of jobs, but the pace of improvement will slow markedly.”

Christian Smalls leads a workers strike at the Amazon fulfillment center on Staten Island in May.Credit…Gabriela Bhaskar for The New York Times

The National Labor Relations Board said on Thursday that it had found merit in a complaint that Amazon wrongfully fired a warehouse worker in retaliation for organizing colleagues concerned about pandemic safety conditions.

Kevin Petroccione, a congressional liaison for the National Labor Relations Board, said if Amazon did not settle, the board would file a formal complaint against the company.

Amazon did not respond to a request for comment. The finding was earlier reported by Vice.

The charge of unfair labor practices was brought by Gerald Bryson, who worked at Amazon’s warehouse in Staten Island, N.Y. Mr. Bryson had joined with other workers, including one named Christian Smalls, in a protest over safety concerns in late March after the pandemic struck. Amazon immediately fired Mr. Smalls. About a week later, Mr. Bryson protested again in the parking lot of the building.

Amazon fired Mr. Bryson about two weeks later, saying he had violated the company’s vulgar language policy during a confrontation with another worker in the second protest, according to Frank Kearl, Mr. Bryson’s lawyer.

In June, Mr. Bryson filed a case with the National Labor Relations Board, effectively saying that Amazon selectively enforced its vulgar language policy as an excuse to retaliate against Mr. Bryson for his organizing. Mr. Kearl said the agency told him of the finding late last month.

If Amazon does not reach a settlement, which could include back pay or reinstating Mr. Bryson’s job, the agency plans to file a complaint to be heard by an administrative law judge. It filed a similar retaliation complaint against Amazon in a case of a worker in Pennsylvania who protested conditions during the pandemic. That case is pending.

Do you work in an Amazon warehouse and have a labor issue? We want to hear from you. Contact the reporter of this article at karen.weise@nytimes.com.

Nearly a year after the coronavirus outbreak, the full impact of the pandemic on the U.S. economy remains unclear. Some of the most obvious indicators are in conflict: As some companies report enormous profits, the number of unemployed Americans is nearly 10 million more than it was in February, and hundreds of thousands are expected to have filed new unemployment claims last week.

The Times interviewed a rage of economists and experts who suggested looking at eight measures to understand the state of the economy that President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. will face on Jan. 20.

  • Wages: That wages and salaries have bounced back quickly is a sign that things are on track for a rapid recovery. During the last recession — which Mr. Biden and then-President Barack Obama inherited in 2009 — drops of wages and salaries took years to recover.

  • Unemployment for Black men: The current crisis has had a particularly negative, persistent impact on employment for Black men, who face an unemployment rate of 11.3 percent, five percentage points higher than the unemployment rate for white men.

  • Long-term unemployment: The number of Americans who are still in the labor force but have been unemployed for more than six months has been increasing since April. A sociologist with a left-leaning think tank said the rise in long-term unemployment, coupled with the fact that millions of workers have left the labor market altogether since February, indicated “a very serious problem in connecting people who are able to produce needed goods and services with the opportunity to do so.”

  • Housing costs: Home prices and rents have risen during the pandemic. But while the rising costs have strained low-income renters, the rise in housing prices typically signals strong economic growth.

  • New businesses: Even as countless businesses have been forced to close over the course of the pandemic, the increase in business applications over the last year is a sign that the economy may be adapting rather than totally seizing.

  • Spending on goods: Though the pandemic has altered Americans’ day-to-day lives, it hasn’t halted their spending as much as some feared it would. Consumption has shifted toward goods over services — buying alcohol from stores instead of from bars, for example — bucking a generational trend toward a service economy.

  • Food scarcity — More families across the country are unable to meet their basic needs for housing and food security, according to a Census Bureau survey.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi in the Capitol. After months of stalemate, congressional leaders were on the verge of cementing a stimulus deal.Credit…Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times

Top Democrats and Republicans in Congress haggled on Thursday over the remaining hurdles to an emerging $900 billion stimulus deal, with Democrats making a last-ditch effort to use the package to deliver more emergency aid to states struggling amid the pandemic.

With Congress running out of time to deliver another round of relief to Americans and stave off a government shutdown on Friday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi reported more momentum toward a compromise that could be ready as early as today.

“We made some progress this morning,” Ms. Pelosi, of California, told reporters at the Capitol. Asked if a final agreement would be announced within the day, she said: “We’ll let you know.”

The plan under discussion would provide a dose of badly needed relief after months of stalled negotiations and amid a national public health crisis that has killed more than 307,000 people.

That includes a new round of stimulus payments, probably $600, to American adults; a temporary infusion of enhanced federal jobless aid of around $300 per week; and rental and food assistance. It would also revive a loan program for struggling small businesses and provide funding for schools, hospitals and the distribution of the vaccine.

With plans to merge a final agreement with a sweeping omnibus government funding package, Congress may have to approve another stopgap spending measure to avert a government shutdown on Friday while negotiators put the finishing touches on the stimulus deal. Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, warned Republicans on Wednesday that they should prepare to remain in Washington through the weekend.

“I hope it wouldn’t be more than 24 or 48 hours,” Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 2 Republican, said of a possible stopgap bill, adding, “I really think this is coming to a close.”

Ms. Pelosi, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the minority leader, and Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary, spoke late Wednesday evening to continue ironing out differences over the measure, a spokesman for Ms. Pelosi said, and they planned to continue talks on Thursday.

In order to reach an agreement, Republicans appear to have dropped their demand for a sweeping coronavirus liability shield for businesses in exchange for Democrats agreeing to exclude a direct funding stream for state and local governments that are facing fiscal crises, according to two officials familiar with the discussions.

But Democrats were pushing to provide billions of dollars for governors to use for health-related expenses during the pandemic — including vaccine distribution — and extend emergency federal assistance for states and local governments through the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Republicans who have fiercely opposed sending more aid to states and cities were resisting the moves, concerned about leaving FEMA with enough money for future natural disasters and about the lack of restrictions on how the funds are spent.

Some Republicans — in particular Senator Patrick J. Toomey, Republican of Pennsylvania — were pushing to curtail the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending authority, which Democrats argue would hamper the Biden administration’s ability to continue supporting the country’s economic recovery. After the Federal Reserve used such authority earlier this year after the enactment of the $2.2 trillion stimulus law, Mr. Mnuchin clawed back the remaining funds in part to offset the cost of another stimulus bill.

There is also a push to include billions of dollars in relief for theaters and venues, something that lawmakers in both parties support.

Zach Montague contributed reporting.

By: Ella Koeze·Source: Refinitiv

  • A generally upbeat mood prevailed in global stock markets on Thursday, as lawmakers from both parties in Washington signaled they were close to reaching a deal on an economic aid package, an extraordinary shift in tone from both Republicans and Democrats, and more people received a coronavirus vaccine.

  • Investors are also looking toward an economic recovery sometime next year with one coronavirus vaccine already approved in several countries, and a second close to receiving emergency approval.

  • Still, the pandemic is far from over and continuing to take a staggering human and economic toll. Claims for state unemployment insurance illustrated this on Thursday, with 935,000 filing new claims last week, the Labor Department said.

  • The market gains on Thursday were relatively small: the S&P 500 rose about half a percent in early trading. The Stoxx Europe 600 gained 0.5 percent, while the FTSE in Britain was flat. Most Asian indexes closed the day with gains.

  • In Washington, talks continued on a $900 billion stimulus plan that would provide a new round of direct payments to millions of Americans as well as additional unemployment benefits, food assistance and rental aid. Republicans and Democrats alike signaled that they were ready to coalesce around the main elements, though a final agreement hasn’t been reached.

  • The Federal Reserve chair, Jerome H. Powell, on Wednesday made a point of saying the central bank was in no mood to begin scaling back its efforts to bolster the economy. He said the Fed’s policy decisions were intended to show that policymakers would “deliver powerful support to the economy until the recovery is complete.” He said the economy would face near-term challenges, but would likely bounce back quickly once vaccines were widely available, perhaps by midyear.

Baiju Bhatt and Vladimir Tenev, Robinhood’s co-founders, in 2018. Millions of investors have turned to the app in recent years.Credit…Reuters

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday said that Robinhood, the stock trading app, had misled its customers about how it was paid by Wall Street firms for passing along customer trades, the latest enforcement action against the popular platform.

Robinhood agreed to pay a $65 million fine to settle the charges, the latest blow to the company whose popularity has surged since its founding, offering commission-free trading and an easy-to-use app. Critics have said that the company relied on practices that hurt its rapidly growing base of customers, who tend to be younger and less experienced.

The charges announced on Thursday apply to Robinhood’s disclosures from 2015 to late 2018, the regulator said.

The S.E.C. had charged Robinhood with “repeated misstatements that failed to disclose the firm’s receipt of payments from trading firms for routing customer orders to them, and with failing to satisfy its duty to seek the best reasonably available terms to execute customer orders,” it said in a statement.

“Robinhood provided misleading information to customers about the true costs of choosing to trade with the firm,” Stephanie Avakian, director of the S.E.C.’s enforcement division, said in a statement. “Brokerage firms cannot mislead customers about order execution quality.”

As part of the settlement, Robinhood did not admit or deny the allegations. But Dan Gallagher, its chief legal officer, said that the company was committed to helping meet its customers’ needs. “The settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today,” he said in a statement.

Millions of investors have turned to Robinhood in recent years, lured by the simple fact that the site allows investors to trade without paying commissions. Much of the retail brokerage industry has since followed suit, resulting in a surge of retail trading activity this year.

Because they do not charge commissions, brokerage firms like Robinhood make money by charging high-speed trading firms for the right to execute their clients’ orders, a practice called payment for order flow. The trading firms are willing to pay Robinhood because they can eke out incremental gains on individual trades, which because of their speed and scale add up to large amounts of money.

But that also means that the high-speed trading firms determine the price one of Robinhood’s clients would pay for shares, or what they might receive for selling stock.

The S.E.C. said that for several years, the company had failed to be transparent with customers about its use of payment for order flow. It also said that the brokerage firm had violated a duty to get customers the best possible prices for their orders, tying that failure to the high payment rates it received from trading firms in exchange for customers’ trades.

In its order summarizing the settlement, the S.E.C. said that although the company was publicly declaring that its customers were getting trading terms as good as or better than what rivals offered, internal reviews showed that was far from the case.

The federal charges come a day after regulators in Massachusetts accused Robinhood of aggressively courting and manipulating inexperienced investors and then failing to protect them. In a complaint, the Massachusetts secretary of the commonwealth, William F. Galvin, said that Robinhood focused on signing up young traders with perks like free shares, and then used “gamification” marketing techniques to persuade them to trade often.

Matt Phillips and Gregory Schmidt contributed reporting.

Google received a kernel of good news on Thursday when European Union authorities approved its acquisition of the fitness-tracking company Fitbit after a lengthy review to determine whether the $2.1 billion takeover violated antitrust laws.

European regulators had been under pressure to block the deal, first announced last year, but allowed it to move forward after Google agreed not use the health and fitness data collected from Fitbit’s wearable devices and services to target ads at internet users. Google also agreed to continue providing its free Android software to competing makers of fitness and health devices.

The announcement comes as Google faces two antitrust lawsuits in the United States. On Wednesday, 10 state attorneys general accused the Silicon Valley giant of abusing its power in digital advertising. In October, the Justice Department accused the company of using illegal tactics to maintain dominance for its search engine.

The European Commission, the E.U.’s executive body, has brought three antitrust cases against Google in recent years. The company is appealing the fines.

The central bank left its benchmark interest rate at 0.1 percent and did not increase its purchases of government bonds. Credit…Andrew Testa for The New York Times

The Bank of England, which has been battling not only a pandemic but the threat of a disruptive exit from the European Union, made no changes to its monetary policy Thursday amid signs that both threats could be receding.

The central bank left its benchmark interest rate at 0.1 percent and did not increase its purchases of government bonds. In November, at its last meeting, the bank’s Monetary Policy Committee expanded the bond purchases, a way of holding down market interest rates, by £150 billion. The bank said Thursday it would continue to aim for total asset purchases of £895 billion, or $1.2 trillion.

The bank also extended by six months a program that allows commercial banks to borrow money at or close to the benchmark interest rate, if they funnel the money to small and midsize businesses.

Successful development of vaccines against the coronavirus are “likely to reduce the downside risks to the economic outlook from Covid,” the Monetary Policy Committee said in a statement. But the committee also said growth would be “a little weaker” than policymakers expected in November because of sharper lockdowns.

Negotiators for Britain and the European Union continued to meet in Brussels on Thursday, and there were indications they had narrowed their differences, potentially averting a no-deal Brexit that would be bad for both economies, but especially Britain’s.

In one example of the potential damage, the German automaker BMW warned that it would have to significantly raise prices for cars sold in Britain if there were no deal. Nicolas Peter, the company’s chief financial officer, told German media on Wednesday that BMW would also have to raise the price of British-made Minis sold in Europe because of import and export tariffs.

  • Unilever, a major advertiser, said it would resume spending in January on U.S. ads on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter but would continue to monitor the social media platforms for hate speech, misinformation and postelection “polarization.” The company stepped away in June but said on Thursday that it was “encouraged by the platforms’ new commitments and reporting to monitor progress.”

  • Ten state attorneys general on Wednesday accused Google of illegally abusing its monopoly over the technology that delivers ads online. The state prosecutors said that Google overcharged publishers for the ads it showed across the web and edged out rivals who tried to challenge the company’s dominance. They also said that Google had reached an agreement with Facebook to limit the social network’s own efforts to compete with Google for ad dollars. Google said the suit was “baseless” and that it would fight the case.

  • Tyson Foods has fired seven workers accused of being involved in a betting pool over how many employees would get the coronavirus, the company said Wednesday. The son of a meatpacking worker who died in April filed a suit claiming that the manager of the Waterloo, Iowa, pork plant organized a “cash buy-in, winner take all” betting pool. In all, about 1,000 workers at the plant — about a third of the work force — tested positive for the virus. Tyson had hired the law firm Covington & Burling to conduct an independent investigation of the matter, led by Eric H. Holder Jr., the former U.S. attorney general.

The Pandemic’s Toll

Credit…Audra Melton for The New York TimesCredit…Audra Melton for The New York Times

There remains widespread confusion about a key element of the plan to protect some of the most vulnerable Americans against the coronavirus, report Rebecca Robbins and Jessica Silver-Greenberg for The New York Times: how nursing homes will get consent to vaccinate residents who aren’t able to make their own medical decisions.

Some states are starting vaccinations in their nursing homes this week, but a broader nationwide effort will start in earnest on Monday as CVS and Walgreens employees begin to arrive at tens of thousands of nursing homes and assisted-living facilities to vaccinate staff and residents.

A CVS executive said such residents’ legal representatives will be able to provide consent to nursing homes electronically or over the phone, but officials at multiple large nursing home chains said they were not aware of that.

If residents or their representatives have not given consent before CVS or Walgreens employees show up, it is not clear whether or when they will have another chance to be inoculated.

There is no federal requirement for people to give consent before getting vaccinated, but it is standard practice and is often needed for billing purposes. States have different requirements about how medical consent can be given and what information needs to be provided to the person who is consenting. Guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is that residents or their representatives should receive a fact sheet about the coronavirus vaccine and then consent to receiving it.

Executives from CVS and Walgreens said in interviews that they had been planning the vaccination campaign for months and were confident it would work. “If there are concerns or challenges, we certainly are open to work with facilities to try to minimize any disruption that they may have,” said Rick Gates, a Walgreens executive leading the company’s planning.

Categories
Health

Moderna Vaccine Is Extremely Protecting and Prevents Extreme Covid, Knowledge Present

WASHINGTON – Newly released data confirmed on Tuesday that Moderna’s coronavirus vaccine offers high levels of protection and sets the stage for this week’s emergency approval from federal regulators and beginning its spread across the country.

The Food and Drug Administration intends to approve use of the vaccine on Friday, said people familiar with the agency’s plans. The decision would give millions of Americans access to a second coronavirus vaccine as early as Monday.

The FDA review confirms Moderna’s earlier assessment that the vaccine had an efficacy rate of 94.1 percent in a study of 30,000 people. Side effects, including fever, headache, and fatigue, were uncomfortable but not dangerous, the agency found.

The success of Moderna’s vaccine has become all the more important to fighting the pandemic as other vaccine efforts have stalled. The hopeful news comes at a time with a record number of coronavirus cases overwhelming hospitals and an ever-increasing death toll that hit a bleak milestone of 300,000 on Monday.

The data release is the first step in a public review process that includes a one-day meeting on Thursday by an independent panel of experts. You will hear from Moderna, FDA scientists, and the public before they vote on whether to recommend approval. The panel is expected to vote yes and the FDA generally follows the experts’ recommendations.

Distribution of about six million doses could then begin next week, significantly adding to the millions of doses already developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, the companies that only released the first emergency coronavirus vaccine last Friday . Healthcare workers received the first shots of the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine Monday with an efficacy rate of 95 percent.

The introduction of vaccines has been eagerly anticipated and is one of the most ambitious vaccination campaigns ever carried out in the United States.

Last summer, the federal government signed contracts with Moderna and Pfizer to dispense a total of 200 million cans in the first quarter of 2021. Since both vaccines require two doses, these contracts guaranteed enough doses for 100 million people.

Last week the government announced that it had bought an additional 100 million doses of Moderna for the second quarter, bringing the number of Americans who can be vaccinated to 150 million. That leaves the question of how and when the 180 million or so other Americans will be covered.

Both vaccines are made available to the public free of charge.

Moderna’s vaccine has become a symbol of government scientists’ successes during the pandemic. After China released the genetic sequence of the new virus in early January, scientists from Moderna and the National Institutes of Health were able to focus on designing a vaccine in just two days. Unlike Pfizer, Moderna has a close relationship with Operation Warp Speed, the federal program that seeks to get a vaccine to market quickly. Nearly $ 2.5 billion federal funding helped Moderna buy raw materials, expand its factory, and increase its workforce by 50 percent.

Moderna’s success contrasts with two other high profile projects the US had hoped would increase vaccine supply: one from pharmaceutical companies Sanofi from France and GlaxoSmithKline from the UK and one from Anglo-Swedish drug maker AstraZeneca and the Oxford University.

AstraZeneca and Oxford used two different doses in clinical trials in the UK and Brazil. The effectiveness was 62 percent at one level and 90 percent at the other. These jumbled results have made it unclear when AstraZeneca will have enough data to obtain an emergency clearance.

Meanwhile, Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline received disappointing results with their vaccine in early clinical trials. While it produced a promising immune response in volunteers under the age of 50, it did not do so in older people. The companies are now planning a series of new studies with a different version of the vaccine. Due to the delay, they are unlikely to provide vaccines before the end of 2021.

Moderna’s vaccine worked equally well in white volunteers and in color communities. There was also no significant difference between protecting men and women or between healthy volunteers and those at risk for severe Covid-19 who developed conditions such as obesity and diabetes. For people aged 65 and over, the study found an estimated effectiveness of 86.4 percent, which is below the overall estimate of 94.1 percent. However, the apparent difference was not statistically significant.

So far, FDA reviews have shown two possible differences between vaccines, but the results may reflect a lack of data more than real differences. The Pfizer BioNTech study showed that the vaccine began protecting against the coronavirus within about 10 days of the first dose. The experiment with the vaccine from Moderna, however, did not show such a noticeable effect after the first dose.

However, in the early days of the Moderna study, there were fewer cases of Covid-19 among study participants, making it more difficult to measure the differences between the vaccinated group and the placebo group. In either case, health officials have said that for both vaccines, two doses are essential for complete protection.

Updated

Dec. 15, 2020 at 9:31 am ET

A second difference concerns the ability to prevent serious diseases. Moderna presented more evidence that its vaccine can, according to the review. In his study, 30 volunteers developed severe cases of Covid. All of them belonged to the placebo group, with no cases among the vaccinated people.

In the Pfizer BioNTech study, the results were less convincing. There were 10 severe cases in the placebo group and one in the vaccinated group. These numbers are too few to assess the vaccine’s ability to prevent serious diseases.

“The data available for these results did not allow firm conclusions,” said the FDA.

The documents released on Tuesday made it clear that side effects were particularly common after the second dose, but usually lasted only one day. Experts say people may need to take a day off after the shot.

During the Moderna trial, researchers also kept an eye out for volunteers who developed new disorders. In a multi-month study of 30,000 volunteers, it is normal for some to have conditions unrelated to the vaccine, health experts say. Comparing the rates between people receiving the vaccine and placebo, as well as general background rates, can help identify serious concerns and eliminate coincidences.

During the Moderna study, three vaccinated participants developed a form of temporary facial paralysis called Bell’s palsy, while one participant on the placebo experienced the same. Bell’s palsy, which can last weeks or longer, can be triggered by viral infections and other causes. Around 40,000 people develop the disease in the United States each year. Years of intensive research have found no evidence that any vaccine routinely recommended in the US causes Bell’s palsy.

In the review released Tuesday, the FDA said, “There is insufficient information currently available to establish a causal relationship with the vaccine.”

The Pfizer BioNTech study identified four cases in the vaccine group, including one in a person with a history of the disorder and none in the placebo group.

Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA’s lead vaccine regulator, said in an interview with JAMA Monday that the cases of Bell’s palsy in the study were most likely not caused by the vaccine and that the apparent difference between the two groups of volunteers was only one reason Random question.

“Our working hypothesis is just that this is an imbalance in the background rates, as we’ve seen in other studies,” he said.

In its analysis of the Moderna vaccine released Tuesday, the FDA said it plans to recommend prosecuting Bell palsy cases when the vaccines are rolled out.

“We’re going to ask about this just to wrap up that question,” said Dr. Marks on Monday.

The FDA’s analysis did not reveal any serious allergic reactions to the Moderna vaccine. The same was true for the Pfizer-BioNTech clinical trial, but when vaccinations began in the UK outside of that study, two people with a history of serious allergies had a severe and potentially life-threatening reaction called anaphylaxis.

UK health officials have said people with a history of anaphylaxis should avoid the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine.

In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has stated that people with serious allergies can be safely vaccinated, with close monitoring for 30 minutes after receiving the shot.

Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines are similar in their ingredients, but not identical. Therefore, it is not clear whether an allergic reaction to one vaccine would occur with the other. Both are made up of genetic material called mRNA that is enclosed in a bladder made of a mixture of fats. The two companies use different fats.

Moderna has applied for approval to vaccinate people aged 18 and over, as in its study. The Pfizer BioNTech vaccine was approved for people aged 16 and over because the study included a number of younger volunteers. Both companies are conducting experiments with children aged 12 and over and plan to also study younger children.

Sharon LaFraniere contributed to the coverage.

[Like the Science Times page on Facebook. | Sign up for the Science Times newsletter.]

Categories
Business

Apple TV Was Making a Present About Gawker. Then Tim Cook dinner Discovered Out.

“It’s something that gave me a break and thought about, but I would do it the same way again,” he said. “It is more general to know more about the private lives of the people who run this society. If writing about Apple’s CEO isn’t limited, who would it be? “(An Apple spokesperson didn’t answer questions about how Mr. Cook felt about the coverage at the time.)

Apple, a company whose corporate culture is tightly controlled by the same small group of men who have led it for two decades and whose consumer value is about protecting their privacy, doesn’t quite see the world that way.

Now “Scraper” is returning to the market and could still see daylight from another manufacturer. Another company, Anonymous Content, bought the option to develop a New York article on Gawker, said a person familiar with the deal. (The New York article was written by Jeffrey Toobin, a frequent target of Gawker.)

Apple TV +, which launched a year ago, is struggling to find its way in a climate where top creative managers Jamie Erlicht and Zack Van Amburg are apparently constantly trying to guess what Mr. Cook and Mr. Cue might like . or might object. That has largely ruled out the kind of prestige drama that defined other breakout streaming services. The service is currently enjoying modest success with a show that would be home on television, cute and funny “Ted Lasso”. (The branding can be a bit noticeable: some “Ted Lasso” scenes include up to three Apple devices, and Siri makes a cameo.)

The company is in no hurry, however, and their strategy on other media projects has been to lead them from failure to success, if not a success strong enough for you to sign up when the thing is on your phone is preinstalled – Apple’s real economic advantage in the media business. This also applies to Apple Music, the second largest streaming service in the world. and from Apple News, a well-curated, if not exciting, app that reportedly gives President-elect Joe Biden his information. Apple’s biggest streaming coup in the pandemic was to include the film “Greyhound,” the drama of World War II with – who else? – Tom Hanks.

And Apple’s willingness to sacrifice creative freedom for corporate risk management is still an outlier. None of my reports suggest that Mr. Bezos is reaching into the Amazon studio (or the Washington Post) to kill negative portrayals of e-commerce or the police, or that Mr. Stankey demonstrates AT&T routers in “Lovecraft Country ”. The question, of course, is how long, even in these companies, the old law will be overridden – that whoever pays the piper calls the tune.

However, it’s worth noting that the men who run these companies have made their priorities clear at a time when more and more American viewers are turning to streaming to understand culture, history, and even reality. At Netflix, Mr Hastings cleared the Saudi monarchy and streamed an episode of Hasan Minhaj’s comedy talk show Patriot Act after the show criticized the role of Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in the murder of the journalist had Jamal Khashoggi.

“We’re not trying to bring the truth to power,” Hastings said last year. “We’re trying to entertain.”

Categories
Entertainment

Pentatonix Covers “Wonderful Grace” on The Kelly Clarkson Present

When Pentatonix released their flawless cover of “Amazing Grace” on November 5th, it was immediately high on our list as one of the most beautiful renditions we have heard of the song. But during their performance on The Kelly Clarkson Show On Wednesday, the group took things to the next level with a special arrangement of the beloved melody.

Members Matt Sallee, Scott Hoying, Mitch Grassi, Kirstin Maldonado and Kevin Olusola seriously scared us when they put on a scaled-down a cappella performance of “Amazing Grace – From Their Latest Album”. We need a little Christmas – put their pure singing and breathtaking harmonies at the center. Watch the heartwarming cover at the top to get in the holiday mood!