Categories
Health

Juul Settles Multistate Youth Vaping Inquiry for $438.5 Million

Juul Labs, which is struggling to survive in the United States, on Tuesday tentatively agreed to pay $438.5 million to settle an investigation by nearly three dozen states into marketing and sales practices they allege they started the teenage e-cigarette crisis.

The company said it did not acknowledge any wrongdoing in the settlement but was trying to “resolve past issues” while awaiting a decision from the Food and Drug Administration on whether it can continue to sell its products. Juul has attempted to reposition itself as a seller of vaping products that could help adults quit smoking traditional cigarettes to restore its tarnished reputation and improve its diminished market value.

The preliminary agreement prohibits the company from marketing to youth, funding education in schools and misrepresenting the nicotine content of its products. But Juul had already halted several marketing practices and withdrawn many of its flavored pods, which appealed to teenagers, several years ago, under public pressure from lawmakers, parents, and health experts when the vaping crisis was at its height.

“We believe this will go a long way in stemming the influx of vaping among youth,” Connecticut Attorney General William Tong said at a news conference Tuesday. “We are under no illusions and cannot claim that it will discourage the youth from vaping. It remains an epidemic. It’s still a big problem. But we essentially took away a large chunk of the former leader.”

The cross-country investigation found the company was targeting young people by hiring young models, using social media to woo teenagers and giving out free samples, he said. And, he added, the research found that the company had a “weak” age verification system for its products and that 45 percent of its Twitter followers were between the ages of 13 and 17.

Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares pointed out in a statement that the company’s previous strategy of selling flavors like mango and crème brûlée appealed to the youth, as did its device’s sleek design, which was easy to conceal. A condition of the settlement prohibited the company from depicting anyone under the age of 35 in its marketing images, Mr Miyares’ statement said.

Juul said Tuesday that the settlement agreement was “aligned with our current business practices, which we began implementing following our company-wide reset in the fall of 2019.”

“We remain focused on the future as we work to fulfill our mission to move adult smokers away from cigarettes – the leading cause of preventable deaths – while tackling underage smoking,” the company’s statement said.

The agreement does not resolve all of the Company’s litigation. While Juul previously reached settlements in lawsuits filed by attorneys general in North Carolina, Washington, Louisiana and Arizona, nine similar cases remain. Major lawsuits filed by New York and California, among others, remain pending. And about 3,600 lawsuits from individuals, school districts and local governments were consolidated in a lawsuit that is still moving through a California court.

Juul is still selling tobacco- and menthol-flavored capsules and vaping products while its application for permanent sale is under FDA review. The agency originally denied the company’s application in June, saying Juul failed to provide sufficient evidence that its products would benefit public health, citing “inadequate and conflicting” data from the company.

Juul received a temporary pardon in court. It has since argued that it has helped two million adult smokers quit traditional cigarettes and has taken issue with the agency’s conclusions on chemicals in its products. The FDA then relented its rejection and announced that it would conduct an additional review of “scientific issues” in the application.

States differ in how they use settlement funds, which must be paid over six to 10 years. A spokeswoman for the Connecticut Attorney General said her share (more than $16 million) would go towards vaping and nicotine cessation and addiction treatment. Texas estimated it would receive nearly $43 million, and Virginia put its share at $16.6 million.

Meredith Berkman, co-founder of Parents Against Vaping E-Cigarettes, said she was pleased to learn of the settlement. She became involved with the group after Juul sent a representative to her son’s ninth-grade high school to speak at a gathering in 2018. Her son passed on that the rep had called the product “perfectly safe,” a conversation Ms. Berkman told a congressional hearing in 2019.

Since then, she said, the group has heard from hundreds of families who claim their teens have become addicted to vaping Juul and other nicotine and marijuana devices. Some young people became seriously ill from vaping and others had to go to drug rehabilitation to get rid of nicotine addiction.

“It was Juul who showed up and opened this horrible Pandora’s box,” Ms. Berkman said. “No amount of money can undo the damage caused by Juul’s targeting and marketing to teenagers, whose use of the company’s stealth-by-design flavored products caused many children to experience severe nicotine addiction and physical harm.”

E-cigarette use among teens appears to have declined in recent years, although the coronavirus pandemic had brought new momentum to the leading monitor of teenage tobacco use, a survey conducted in schools by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In March, that survey showed that nearly 8 percent, or about two million college students, said they had used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days.

While Juul was once the youth favorite, the survey showed that the candy and fruit flavored Puff Bar vapes were the most popular among youth, with Juul ranking fourth among college students. Data from IRI, a market research firm, suggests the brand was attracting more adult customers by closely competing for market leadership with another brand, Vuse Vapes, with about 30 percent of recent sales.

Altria, which bought a 35% stake in Juul for $12.8 billion in December 2018, said in a recent filing with investors that the company’s stake is now worth about $450 million — almost the same amount that Juul had just agreed to settle investigations from nearly three dozen states and Puerto Rico.

After Juul received a thorough scrutiny of its seal of approval among youngsters, it lost significant market share and value when it gave in to public pressure and stopped selling the flavors that appealed most to youngsters.

Although the vaping market still accounts for a small percentage of overall cigarette and other inhalation product sales, the FDA has repeatedly fallen short in its efforts to curb youth-friendly e-cigarettes, which continue to emerge in new candy colors and flavors. After the agency tried to crack down on existing brands, companies and the market turned to synthetic nicotine to evade regulation.

In March, Congress gave the FDA authority to take synthetic nicotine off the market. But the agency is methodical, reviewing about a million applications it received this spring from manufacturers of non-tobacco nicotine products. She has to exercise a degree of caution in order for her judgments to stand up in court.

The agency also continues to review and approve some marketing authorization applications that were submitted years ago for leading vapes, typically sold in gas stations and convenience stores. However, she recently said she does not expect to complete the review of the applications already submitted before next year.

Involved in the settlement: Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Maine, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Puerto Rico, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Categories
Health

Juul Settles N.C. Vaping Case, Agrees to Pay $40 Million

Mr. Tobias said he was not surprised that Juul did not admit to wrongdoing.

“That almost always happens in these kinds of settlements — that’s a standard clause,” he said.

Juul has not begun other serious settlement talks, however, because none of the other 2,600 lawsuits against the company have been scheduled to begin during 2021. The company is waiting for the F.D.A. ruling before deciding how to move forward. If the F.D.A. will permit Juul’s products to stay on the market to help adult smokers quit, executives believe their negotiating stance will be strengthened.

But settling with numerous plaintiffs would be expensive. Juul has seen sales plummet during the past year, analysts say. The company is private so does not disclose its financial data.

Marc Scheineson, a lawyer with Alston & Bird, whose practice includes small tobacco companies, called the $40 million in the North Carolina settlement “a relatively small sum to pay to avoid mounting legal fees and the plaintiff pile-on syndrome.”

He also noted that most of the steps Juul agreed to take in the consent degree, such as not advertising near schools and behind-the-counter sales, are actions that it has already taken in an effort to gain public favor. Mr. Scheineson also said that electronic nicotine delivery products, such as Juul, “still have an important public health use by adults as a proven effective tool to quit smoking more harmful cigarettes.”

Juul faces other legal threats, too. The Federal Trade Commission is suing Juul, along with the big tobacco company Altria and related parties, seeking to unwind the 2018 deal that gave Altria 35 percent of Juul. Altria, the maker of Marlboro cigarettes, paid $12.8 billion for that stake, but it has since written down the value of the investment to $1.5 billion.

The commission says that the two companies entered into a series of agreements, including Altria’s investment, that eliminated competition in violation of federal antitrust laws. The F.T.C. also claims that Altria and Juul started as competitors in the e-cigarette market, but that as Juul became more popular, Altria dealt with the threat by taking its own Mark Ten e-cigarette off the market in exchange for a share of Juul’s profits. Both Altria and Juul have denied the charges.

Categories
Politics

Hedge fund chief Thomas Sandell settles New York tax fraud declare

The hedge fund founder Thomas Sandell paid a whopping $ 105 million Tuesday to settle claims he fraudulently evaded New York and state taxes on more than $ 450 million for fees earned.

The settlement – which will reward a whistleblower with more than $ 22 million – is the largest recovery in New York State history under the False Claims Act.

This state law was amended more than a decade ago to allow claims related to intentionally evaded taxes.

Swedish-born billionaire Sandell, who did not admit wrongdoing, tried to evade his liability for tens of millions of dollars in taxes paid to the city and state for the 2017 by his firm Sandell Asset Management Corp. fees earned were said to have been owed.

The $ 105 million settlement covered both taxes and damages, according to Attorney General Letitia James and City Company attorney James Johnson. The whistleblower’s reward is 21 percent of that amount.

“The greed that has made it possible for a man not to pay his fair share of taxes is amazing,” said James.

“Thomas Sandell and his company got New York taxpayers out of the tens of millions of dollars in a single year – putting a huge strain on our system and forcing ordinary New Yorkers to bear the cost,” said James.

Chris Doyle, an attorney who represented Sandell in the false claims lawsuit, told CNBC, “Mr. Sandell and his companies have declined to comment.”

Sandell closed his hedge fund in 2019 and turned it into a family office.

In 2007, Sandell’s company agreed to pay more than $ 8 million to settle claims by the Securities and Exchange Commission Asset Management for improper short sales in connection with trading in a New Orleans-based holding company following the hurricane Katrina in 2005.

In the most recent case in New York, officials said that due to a change in the rules for 2008 regarding the recording of deferred fee income in 2017, Sandell was required to record approximately $ 450 million in such income and pay taxes on that money to the state and the city to pay.

“To avoid this liability, Sandell left New York to live in London from August 2016 to mid-2019,” said a press release.

“And while SAMC continued to operate in New York City, Sandell and SAMC have taken steps to create the impression that SAMC is no longer operating in New York City, often with the assistance of an international accounting firm.”

As part of the program, officials said Sandell, with three employees, opened a “Shell office” in Boca Raton, Fla., Which he and his company claimed was SAMC’s only American operation.

Despite the fact that they agreed to a determination by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company’s main place of business continued to be New York City.

Even after several consultants, including an accounting firm that had prepared its taxes for years, warned Sandell that “his tax position was problematic,” he still claimed he did not owe New York taxes on fee income, a 2017 press release said.

Randy Fox, an attorney for the whistleblower who sued Sandell for tax evasion under the False Claims Act, declined to identify the person or individuals who formed the limited liability company Tooley LLC named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit .

When asked what his client or clients would do with the $ 22,050,000 reward – a fraction of which Fox will receive under a contingent fee agreement – the attorney said, “I don’t know.”

“At least buy a nice bottle of champagne,” added Fox.

Fox was the founding director of the New York Attorney General’s Taxpayer Protection Office.

He said Sandell’s alleged circumvention was suspicious because he “already had access to an amazing tax break” that allowed him to invest the money earmarked as fees in an unqualified retirement plan that could generate returns for years before that Charges levied had to be declared for tax purposes.

Fox reported that 49 states allow whistleblowers to sue under false claims that provide rewards for reporting fraud to government agencies.

However, the law only limits about half of these states to compensation for fraud related to government Medicaid programs.

Fox said that until recently, New York was the only state that allowed false claims for damages for any type of fraud. Some states don’t prohibit tax claims for false claims, but they don’t encourage such actions, he said.

“The big question on my mind is why are all these states leaving money on the table … when you think about the difference between taxes paid and taxes owed,” said Fox.

He said the estimated shortfall in actual federal taxes owed versus taxes paid is $ 380 billion annually.

A less accurate estimate is that New York State loses $ 10 billion annually in taxes that should have been paid, he said.

“Tax revenue pays for vital city services. When a deadly pandemic has gutted the economy and weighed heavily on our city’s budget, every dollar counts,” Johnson said.

“Hedge funds, like everyone else, are required to pay taxes, and if they are not, we will use our legal tools and strategies to hold them accountable. Period.”

Categories
Business

UAW union settles corruption probe with Justice Division

UAW President Rory Gamble (left) and US attorney Matthew Schneider announce a settlement agreement in Detroit on December 14, 2020 to end a year-long corruption investigation into the union.

Michael Wayland / CNBC

DETROIT – The federal prosecutor has agreed to end a multi-year corruption investigation into the United Auto Workers as part of a proposed civil settlement that includes an independent monitor that will oversee the American union for six years.

US attorney Matthew Schneider and UAW President Rory Gamble said Monday that the deal, which has yet to be formally approved by the government, comes after months of negotiations between the two sides, including several voluntary reforms by the union.

Other requirements under the contract are that the union hold a nationwide vote to potentially reform its voting process and make certain repayments, including a $ 1.5 million payment to the Internal Revenue Service. The UAW has already repaid approximately $ 15 million to training centers for improper chargebacks uncovered by officials.

“Today we are joining forces to announce that the UAW, one of the largest and most respected unions in the world, is now on its way to being free from corruption,” Schneider said during a joint press conference on Monday in the US Detroit District Attorney’s Office. “During our five-year investigation we have uncovered a staggering level of corruption and fraud by a number of senior UAW leaders.”

The investigation has led to convictions of 15 people, including two former UAW presidents, three Fiat Chrysler executives and a former General Motors board member who was a union leader. The prison terms for those involved ranged from 60 days to 6½ years. A handful of people are still waiting to be sentenced.

Schneider said the deal ended the UAW’s investigation, but more people could be charged if other illegal activities were exposed. He stressed that gambling is not a goal. He said the investigations into Fiat Chrysler and Ford Motor are still ongoing. He reaffirmed that GM is no longer a target of the probe.

“This is for our members,” Gamble said during the press event. “Today is about them. Today is about justice for their very hard-earned dues and the things they provide not just in society but in their individual communities as a whole.”

UAW President Rory Gamble (left) and US attorney Matthew Schneider clash after a settlement agreement was announced in Detroit on December 14, 2020 to end a year-long corruption investigation against the union.

Michael Wayland / CNBC

Schneider thanked Gamble for their cooperation and leading the union to reach the settlement. Gamble called the US attorney “brother” at least twice, a term that is often used in the union among members. The two ended the press conference with a punch.

The independent observer, who must be approved by the government, will not be involved in collective bargaining between the union and the companies in which its members work. The six year period can be shorter or longer depending on the needs and recommendations of the monitor.

“We are determined to make the work of the monitor very boring,” said Gamble, adding that members of the union’s highest board of directors agreed to the settlement. “We will continue to do everything in our power to ensure that past mistakes are never repeated.”

When the union’s federal investigation was published in July 2017, it focused on a training center jointly operated by the UAW and Fiat Chrysler. But it was quickly expanded to perform similar operations with GM and Ford.