Categories
World News

China cracks down on crypto-related providers in ongoing conflict on bitcoin

Budrul Chukrut | LightRakete | Getty Images

The Chinese central bank said Tuesday it had called for the closure of a company that was “suspected of providing software services for virtual currency transactions.” The statement issued by the Beijing Office of the People’s Bank of China also warned institutions not to offer other services related to virtual currency, including providing business premises or marketing.

The fight against digital currencies is nothing new to the authoritarian state.

In 2013, the country ordered third-party vendors to stop using Bitcoin. The Chinese authorities stopped selling tokens in 2017 and promised to continue targeting crypto exchanges in 2019.

But usually every time Beijing hit the crypto industry, Beijing has slacked off and the rules have eventually been relaxed.

This time, however, it seems to be different.

In May, China banned financial institutions and payment companies from offering crypto-related services. In June there were mass arrests in China of people suspected of shamefully using cryptocurrencies. In the same month, regulators increased pressure on banks and payment companies to stop providing cryptocurrency services, and Weibo, the Twitter of China, banned crypto-related accounts.

By July, half of the world’s bitcoin miners had gone dark after Beijing’s call for crackdown on bitcoin mining and trading.

“China’s government is doing everything possible to ensure that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies disappear from the Chinese financial systems and economy,” said Fred Thiel, CEO of Marathon Digital Holdings and a member of the Bitcoin Mining Council.

Why now?

So why did China essentially declare war on cryptocurrencies in 2021?

“We all wonder,” said Nic Carter, founding partner of Castle Island Ventures.

One theory suggests that it is part of a broader legislative and regulatory push ahead of the Chinese Communist Party’s centenary this year.

“They take action against all kinds of undesirable behavior,” Carter said.

Crypto has long been synonymous with crime on the mainland.

“The greatest Ponzi of all time in cryptocurrency was probably Plus Token, a Chinese project,” he said.

In this scheme, scammers tricked investors into $ 5.7 billion and arrested dozens. “You will remember that.”

Another theory is that China is clearing the runway for its own digital yuan, a central bank digital currency that has been in development since 2014.

“Part of it is to ensure the introduction of the Chinese central bank’s digital currency, and part of it is most likely to ensure that all economic activities can be captured by financial monitoring activities,” explained Thiel. The digital yuan could theoretically give the government more power to track spending in real time.

However, Carter argues that Bitcoin and the digital yuan are so different that they cannot really be viewed as direct competitors.

“That is certainly the most common reason given,” said Carter. “I just don’t know if I believe it. They are so different systems from each other. “

The most likely motivator, according to Carter, is that Beijing is trying to stem capital outflows via stablecoins and cryptocurrencies. “China stalling the flow of yuan to crypto is a big deal,” he said.

The price of bitcoin

When it comes to the price of Bitcoin, curbing all of China’s crypto retail “totally moves the needle,” Carter said.

“I think that actually explains a lot of the market weakness and sell-off,” he said. “The good news is that as the crackdown accelerated, Bitcoin stayed pretty flat, which suggests the market has digested that information.”

Thiel believes that the ban on Bitcoin and crypto will actually help Bitcoin in the long term.

“If China’s goal was to kill Bitcoin by shutting down 50% of its mining capacity and banning trading – plummeting its value to punish Chinese owners (a la Didi post-IPO and Ant Financial),” worked it not.
“Instead, Bitcoin has proven its resilience and trading has just moved overseas and miners elsewhere will fill the gap.”

Alyse Killeen, founder and managing partner of Bitcoin-focused venture firm Stillmark, points out that this whole conversation could be a moot point as a government’s ability to enforce a Bitcoin ban will continue to dwindle over time.

“I would expect this type of news to have less of an impact on Bitcoin’s exchange rate than it has in the past,” she said. “It is also true that this news has to some extent been inoculated by the industry – Bitcoin has been banned many times in many regions, yet adoption today is outperforming the Internet at a similar stage in its life cycle.”

Categories
Business

Streaming companies assist maintain some blockbusters locked on film calendar

Still from “Raya and the Last Dragon”.

Disney

The checkout calendar shifts again. On the final day, more than a dozen Hollywood titles were removed from the list due to the Covid pandemic and postponed later in the year or until 2022.

Cinema owners hoping to get a bunch of new blockbuster features by March in December are watching Sony, Disney, and MGM move major films.

On Thursday, MGM’s latest James Bond flick, MGM’s “No Time to Die,” was postponed from April to October, Sony’s “Ghostbusters: Afterlife” was postponed to November, and Sony’s “Morbius” and “Uncharted” were closed for 2022. On Friday later in the year, Disney postponed half a dozen films, including “The King’s Man,” or removed them entirely from the calendar.

The few films that remain in February and March are tied to streaming releases. AT&T / Warner Bros. ‘Tom and Jerry’ hits HBO Max and in theaters February 26th. Disney’s “Raya and the Last Dragon” will debut in theaters and on Disney + on March 5 for $ 30, and AT&T / Warner Bros. ‘Godzilla v. Kong “will hit HBO Max and March 26th in theaters.

Lions Gate’s “Chaos Walking” is the only major film release with no daily and date streaming schedule.

“”[Warner Bros.] has made the right move all along, “said Jeff Bock, senior analyst at Exhibitor Relations.” You may not have cleared it up through the right channels and disheveled some feathers, but make no mistake, WB is the only studio other than Disney that empowers itself and the theaters in a safe and responsible way at the same time. “

The US has at least 187,500 new Covid-19 cases and at least 3,050 virus-related deaths each day, based on a seven-day average calculated by CNBC using data from Johns Hopkins University.

While President Joe Biden has promised to speed up vaccinations across the country, only around 17.5 million doses have been given so far.

Studios fear the continued rise in coronavirus cases will keep moviegoers away from cinemas, even as new titles play on big screens. Many of these films have large production budgets and rely on heavy ticket sales to break even.

However, studios with streaming services have a safety net, Bock said. For Warner Bros., dual release in theaters and on HBO Max allows it to boost subscriber signups and make money from ticket sales.

It is unclear how successful this strategy was, as Wonder Woman 1984 is the only Warner Bros. movie to date to be released this way. AT&T is slated to release quarterly results next week, so analysts are likely to get a better feel for how the movie has done for the company then.

Disney’s release of “Raya and the Last Dragon” is also a premiere. The company previously released “Mulan” on Disney + for a $ 30 premium, but did not release it in theaters at the same time. Disney has yet to comment on how “Mulan” performed for the company.

“It will be tough sledding for the theater,” said Bock. “”[They] must rely on indie distributors until at least May. “

Disclosure: NBCUniversal is the parent company of Universal Studios and CNBC. Universal releases “No Time To Die” internationally, while MGM does the domestic release.

Categories
Business

Walgreens appears to bank card, monetary companies to spice up income

People wearing masks walk on a zebra crossing near a walgreens on September 30, 2020 in New York City.

Alexi Rosenfeld | Getty Images

Walgreens announced Wednesday that it will offer a growing list of financial products to customers – including a co-branded credit card and a prepaid debit card – as it seeks to get more of their wallets and help them manage expensive medical expenses to help.

The credit cards will be introduced in the second half of this year. They will be part of the Mastercard network and will be issued by Synchrony. They will be linked to Walgreens’ new loyalty program, which the company relaunched in November with a new name, perks, and Covid-pandemic-inspired features such as roadside pickup and delivery via DoorDash and Postmates.

Walgreens and his drugstore counterparts are adapting to rapidly changing consumer behavior that accelerated during the pandemic. Walgreens has been looking for new business opportunities including a deal with VillageMD to open hundreds of primary care clinics in its branches.

John Standley, president of Walgreens, said the company also sees financial services as one of those growth drivers. “As we continue to focus on generating new revenue streams, we look forward to researching and rolling out even more health and wellness payment initiatives in the near future,” he said in a press release.

It is the second major retailer this week to announce plans to expand into financial services. Walmart said Monday that a fintech start-up is doing it with Ribbit Capital, one of the venture capital firms that support Robinhood. The separate company will be majority owned by the big box retailer.

The pandemic and recession have put pressure on many families to try to stretch their money as they pay the bills and cope with reduced hours or unemployment. During the holidays, for example, a growing number of consumers looked for other ways to finance their purchases. Use of “buy now, pay later” for online orders increased 109% during the Christmas shopping season, November 1 through December 31, with the largest ramp-up occurring in the last week before Christmas, according to a recent report from Salesforce.

Affirm Holdings, a provider of consumer credit to online shoppers, began trading on the Nasdaq on Wednesday.

Categories
Business

Parler accuses Amazon of breaking antitrust regulation in suspending internet hosting providers.

Hours after going offline on Monday, social media start-up Parler filed a lawsuit in federal court accusing Amazon of antitrust violations and calling for an injunction to prevent that the tech giant is blocking access to cloud computing services.

Amazon told Parler over the weekend that the service would be discontinued because “a steady increase in violent content” on the site indicated the company did not have a reliable process to prevent it from violating Amazon’s Terms of Service. Amazon said it would make sure Parler’s data is preserved so it can be migrated to a new hosting provider.

Millions of people turned to Parler after Twitter and Facebook banned President Trump following the Capitol uprising last week. Apple and Google kicked Parler out of their app stores later this week, although users who had already downloaded the app could still use it. However, the app relied on Amazon’s cloud computing technology.

Parler’s complaint was dated Sunday before Amazon suspended Parler. However, the lawsuit wasn’t filed with the court until Monday.

In the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western Washington District, Parler accused Amazon of terminating, rather than just banning, its account – and said it should have been given 30 days notice. It has also been argued that Amazon violated antitrust laws by teaming up with Twitter, a large Amazon customer, to start Parler just as it was gaining broader appeal. It said it had 12 million users and “expects millions more this week given the growth in recent days.”

Parler did not provide direct evidence that Amazon and Twitter coordinated the response. Instead, it cited a December press release announcing a multi-year strategic partnership between Amazon and Twitter, and cited Twitter’s own challenges in monitoring the content.

Parler said losing Amazon’s services would be a “death knell,” although other platforms popular with far-right and conspiracy theorists, such as Gab and 8chan, have managed to bounce back after being canceled by hosting providers.

David J. Groesbeck, a sole intellectual property attorney based in Olympia, Washington, filed the lawsuit on behalf of Parler. Amazon didn’t respond to an instant request for comment.