Categories
World News

Sequence of U.S. Actions Left Afghan Allies Frantic, Stranded and Wanting to Get Out

WASHINGTON – Als Präsident Biden letzten Monat seine Entscheidung verteidigte, die US-Militärpräsenz in Afghanistan zu beenden, gab er den Afghanen, die ihr Leben riskiert hatten, um den amerikanischen Truppen zu helfen, ein Versprechen, das so alt wie der Krieg selbst war.

„Unsere Botschaft an diese Frauen und Männer ist klar: Es gibt ein Zuhause für Sie in den Vereinigten Staaten, wenn Sie dies wünschen“, sagte der Präsident. “Wir werden zu Ihnen stehen, so wie Sie zu uns standen.”

Aber seine Entscheidung, Anfang des Jahres keine Massenevakuierung afghanischer Dolmetscher, Reiseleiter und ihrer Angehörigen zu beginnen, hat Tausende von Menschen in der Schwebe zurückgelassen, die nach 20 Jahren Krieg in einem Land gestrandet sind, das jetzt von den Taliban kontrolliert wird.

Noch bevor Herr Biden den Abzug der US-Truppen ankündigte, lehnte seine Regierung verzweifelte Aufrufe von Gesetzgebern und Aktivisten ab, Afghanen zu evakuieren, die jetzt in Gefahr sind.

Dann in diesem Sommer flehte Afghanistans Präsident Ashraf Ghani Herrn Biden an, Evakuierungen bis zum endgültigen Abzug der US-Streitkräfte auszusetzen, da er befürchtete, dass das Image das Vertrauen in seine Regierung untergraben würde.

Herr Biden unternahm stattdessen Schritte, um ein von Rückständen geplagtes Visasystem zu rationalisieren, obwohl es nie für die Massenüberführung von Menschen in kurzer Zeit gedacht war. Und in den Vereinigten Staaten äußerten einige Beamte Bedenken über einen möglichen politischen Rückschlag wegen eines Flüchtlingszustroms.

Zusammengenommen ließen die Maßnahmen der Regierung das Versprechen von Herrn Biden am vergangenen Wochenende weitgehend unerfüllt und führten zu brennenden Szenen auf dem Flughafen von Kabul, in denen sich Afghanen an die Seiten abfliegender amerikanischer Flugzeuge klammerten. Und sie stellten die Frage, ob eine Regierung, die erklärt hat, den Menschenrechten im Ausland Vorrang einzuräumen, die Afghanen, von denen sie am meisten abhängt, im Stich gelassen hat, was das traditionelle globale Image der Vereinigten Staaten als Zufluchtsort für die Verfolgten trübt.

Der Präsident verteidigte am Mittwoch den Rückzug der USA und sagte, er sehe keinen Weg, Afghanistan zu verlassen, ohne dass „Chaos“ entsteht. In einem Interview mit ABC News wurde er gefragt, ob der Ausstieg besser hätte gehandhabt werden können.

„Nein, ich glaube nicht, dass es so hätte gehandhabt werden können, dass wir im Nachhinein zurückgehen und nachsehen werden – aber die Idee, dass es irgendwie einen Weg gibt, ohne Chaos herauszukommen, tue ich nicht wissen, wie das passiert“, sagte Herr Biden. “Ich weiß nicht, wie das passiert ist.”

Kritiker sagten jedoch, die Regierung sei direkt schuld.

„Das Versäumnis, unsere Verbündeten zu evakuieren, liegt allein in den Händen der Biden-Regierung, die Veteranen und Befürworter ignorierte, selbst wenn sie detaillierte Pläne zur Evakuierung auf US-Territorium vorlegten“, sagte Chris Purdy, der Projektmanager der Veteranen für das American Ideals-Programm bei Human Rights First.

Seit 2002 beschäftigen die Vereinigten Staaten Afghanen, um ihre Truppen, Diplomaten und Helfer zu unterstützen. Viele dieser Menschen wurden aufgrund ihrer Arbeit bedroht, angegriffen oder zur Flucht gezwungen, was den Kongress im Jahr 2009 veranlasste, ein Visumprogramm speziell für diejenigen, die der US-Regierung geholfen hatten, sowie deren unmittelbare Verwandte einzurichten.

Das Programm ist getrennt von dem Prozess, der normalerweise von denen verwendet wird, die vor Verfolgung oder Folter fliehen. Ungefähr 18.000 Menschen sind dabei, die Visa zu beantragen, und diese Antragsteller haben mindestens 53.000 Verwandte, die zu ihnen berechtigt wären. Trotz eines Mandats des Kongresses, dass die Vereinigten Staaten die Visa in neun Monaten bearbeiten, mussten Tausende mit langen Verzögerungen bei der Überprüfung konfrontiert werden.

Die Biden-Regierung hat nach Angaben des Außenministeriums seit Mitte Juli rund 2.000 der Antragsteller auf Militärstützpunkte evakuiert. Es bereitet die Evakuierung weiterer 800 vor.

In einer Reihe von Treffen und Telefonaten seit März, auch bevor Herr Biden den Rückzug der USA ankündigte, warnten Gesetzgeber und Umsiedlungsbeamte das Weiße Haus und das Außenministerium, dass die Situation eine dringende Reaktion erfordert – eine, die mit dem Sondervisum nicht angegangen werden kann Programm, das laut Umsiedlung und ehemaligen Regierungsbeamten, die unter der Bedingung der Anonymität gesprochen haben, zu lange dauerte, um interne Diskussionen zu beschreiben.

Das spezielle Visaprogramm verlangt von den Antragstellern, dass sie umfangreiche Prüfungen bestehen und ihre Arbeit nachweisen – Dokumente, die für Familien, die gezwungen sind, aus ihrer Heimat zu fliehen, schwer zu bekommen sein können. Die Biden-Regierung hat die vorherige Regierung dafür verantwortlich gemacht, die Verzögerungen durch „extreme Überprüfungsanforderungen“ zu verschlimmern.

Die Rufe nach schnellen Evakuierungen wurden laut, als die Biden-Regierung zusätzliches Personal in Washington und in der Botschaft in Kabul entsandte, um die Rückstände zu beseitigen. Ein Beamter sagte, die Verwaltung habe die Bürokratie durchbrochen, indem sie die Bearbeitungsverzögerungen halbiert habe, die sich bei Amtsantritt von Herrn Biden auf durchschnittlich zwei Jahre beliefen, und den Kongress dazu drängte, die Anzahl der Visa zu erhöhen und auf die Anforderungen für ärztliche Untersuchungen zu verzichten.

Doch selbst unter besten Umständen ist die Überprüfung von Flüchtlingen enorm zeitaufwändig. Die Aussicht, dass Tausende von afghanischen Flüchtlingen in die Vereinigten Staaten – und nicht in andere Länder – kommen, löste bei einigen Regierungsbeamten Bedenken aus, die argumentierten, dass dies das Weiße Haus für politische Rückschläge öffnen würde, so Regierungsbeamte und andere mit der Gegenstand.

Aktualisiert

August 18, 2021, 8:17 Uhr ET

Einige Gesetzgeber, wie der Abgeordnete Matt Rosendale, Republikaner von Montana, haben Bedenken hinsichtlich einer Beschleunigung des Überprüfungsprozesses geäußert.

„Wir werden jetzt ein Verfahren entwickeln, mit dem wir Tausende von Personen untersuchen und einfach in die USA umsiedeln können?“ sagte er in einem Interview. „Sobald sie sich hier eingelebt haben, können sie weitere Familienmitglieder hierher bringen. Eine gute Tat macht keinen Verbündeten.“

Afghanen – insbesondere Frauen und Mädchen – zurückzulassen, könnte für Herrn Biden erhebliche politische Auswirkungen haben.

„Der Tag, an dem sie beginnen, Frauen in Afghanistan zu töten: Das ist ihr politischer Albtraum“, sagte Michael A. McFaul, Professor für internationale Studien an der Stanford University und ehemaliger Botschafter in Russland während der Obama-Regierung. „Diese Zahlen, die den Rückzug unterstützen, sind unglaublich weich. Wenn Frauen, die Geld von USAID genommen haben, verhaftet oder getötet werden, wird diese Unterstützung schnell abnehmen und die Menschen werden über den Präsidenten empört sein.“

Flüchtlingsanwälte sagen, dass die Opfer der Afghanen für die Vereinigten Staaten jedes potenzielle politische Risiko überwiegen sollten, das mit Massenumsiedlungen einhergeht.

„Es ist ziemlich reich, wenn man bedenkt, dass wir diesen Leuten genug vertraut haben, um das Leben der US-Streitkräfte in ihre Hände zu legen, sie aber nicht auf US-Boden zu bringen“, sagte Becca Heller, die geschäftsführende Direktorin des International Refugee Assistance Project, das mit der State Department, um den Afghanen zu helfen.

In den Tagen, seit die Taliban die Kontrolle über Afghanistan übernommen haben, hat Herr Biden zusätzliche 500 Millionen US-Dollar für „unerwarteten dringenden Flüchtlings- und Migrationsbedarf von Flüchtlingen, Konfliktopfern und anderen aufgrund der Situation in Afghanistan gefährdeten Personen“ bewilligt.

Die Regierung rief auch in der gesamten Regierung nach Freiwilligen, die bei der Bearbeitung der afghanischen Visa helfen. Eine E-Mail der United States Citizenship and Immigration Services beschrieb die Gelegenheit als „außergewöhnliche Initiative“ und ermutigte jeden Mitarbeiter in jeder Position, sich zu bewerben.

Die Taliban-Übernahme in Afghanistan verstehen

Karte 1 von 5

Wer sind die Taliban? Die Taliban entstanden 1994 inmitten der Unruhen nach dem Abzug der sowjetischen Truppen aus Afghanistan 1989. Sie setzten brutale öffentliche Strafen ein, darunter Auspeitschungen, Amputationen und Massenhinrichtungen, um ihre Regeln durchzusetzen. Hier ist mehr über ihre Entstehungsgeschichte und ihre Bilanz als Herrscher.

Wer sind die Taliban-Führer? Dies sind die obersten Anführer der Taliban, Männer, die jahrelang auf der Flucht, untergetaucht, im Gefängnis und amerikanischen Drohnen ausgewichen sind. Sie tauchen jetzt aus der Dunkelheit auf, aber über sie oder ihre Regierungspläne ist wenig bekannt.

Die beiden obersten Führer des Pentagon sagten am Mittwoch, dass die Vereinigten Staaten sich verpflichtet haben, alle Amerikaner zu evakuieren, die Afghanistan verlassen wollen, sowie Afghanen, die bei den Kriegsanstrengungen geholfen haben und für die Einreise in die Vereinigten Staaten freigegeben wurden.

„Wir beabsichtigen, diejenigen zu evakuieren, die uns seit Jahren unterstützen, und wir werden sie nicht zurücklassen“, sagte General Mark A. Milley, der Vorsitzende der Joint Chiefs of Staff, gegenüber Reportern. “Und wir werden so viele wie möglich rausbringen.”

Bei einer Pressekonferenz jedoch würden weder General Milley noch Verteidigungsminister Lloyd J. Austin III Amerikanern, Afghanen und anderen Ausländern außerhalb des Umkreises einen sicheren Durchgang zum Flughafen garantieren.

„Die Kräfte, die wir haben, konzentrieren sich auf die Sicherheit des Flugplatzes“, sagte Austin. “Ich habe nicht die Möglichkeit, die Operationen derzeit nach Kabul auszudehnen.”

Die Regierung hat darauf bestanden, dass ihre Handlungen in den letzten Monaten kalkulierte Entscheidungen und keine Fehltritte waren.

Sie stützte sich auf Geheimdienstinformationen, die belegen, dass eine Übernahme durch die Taliban 18 Monate entfernt war, und Beamte haben eingeräumt, dass sie das Tempo des Taliban-Vormarschs unterschätzt haben, als sie überlegten, ob Evakuierungen durchgeführt werden sollten. Viele Afghanen standen kurz vor dem Ende der Visa-Pipeline, was den Beamten ein falsches Gefühl gab, dass die Regierung genügend Zeit hatte, sich weiterhin auf das Visaprogramm zu verlassen.

Die Regierung hat auch die Bitte von Herrn Ghani im Laufe des Sommers betont, Evakuierungen so lange aufzuschieben, bis die Amerikaner Afghanistan verlassen haben.

„Die afghanische Regierung und ihre Unterstützer, darunter viele der Menschen, die jetzt ausreisen wollen, haben sich leidenschaftlich dafür eingesetzt, dass wir keine Massenevakuierungen durchführen sollten, damit wir nicht das Vertrauen in die Regierung verlieren“, sagte Jake Sullivan, der nationale Sicherheitsberater, sagte bei einer Pressekonferenz im Weißen Haus am Dienstag. “Unsere signalisierte Unterstützung für die Regierung hat die Regierung offensichtlich nicht gerettet, aber dies war ein wohlüberlegtes Urteil.”

Die Regierung zögerte monatelang, die Afghanen auf Militärstützpunkte in den Vereinigten Staaten oder ihren Territorien wie Guam zu verlegen, und zog es vor, sie stattdessen in andere Länder zu verlegen, so Regierungsbeamte und Personen, die mit den Beratungen des Weißen Hauses und des Außenministeriums vertraut waren. Viele der Evakuierten hätten während der Bearbeitung ihrer Visa nur vorübergehenden Schutz. Wenn ihnen das Visum verweigert würde, müssten sie in den USA Asyl oder eine andere Form des Schutzes beantragen – Einwanderungsprogramme, die die Republikaner ergriffen haben, um Herrn Biden anzugreifen.

„Sie befinden sich im Grunde in den Vereinigten Staaten, und es gibt keinen wirklich effektiven Weg, um effektiv nein zu sagen“, sagte Barbara L. Strack, eine ehemalige Leiterin der Abteilung für Flüchtlingsangelegenheiten bei Citizenship and Immigration Services während der Regierungen Bush und Obama . „Die Regierung macht sich Sorgen über die ‚Nein‘-Fälle.“

Ein ehemaliger Bauunternehmer für die Vereinigten Staaten, der aus Jalalabad umgesiedelt wurde, schlenderte am Montagnachmittag ziellos vor einer Wohnanlage im Osten von Maryland und machte sich mit seiner neuen Umgebung vertraut.

Der Mann, der aus Angst um seine Sicherheit nur als Masoon identifiziert werden wollte, sagte, er habe es nach einem 20-stündigen Zwischenstopp auf der Militärbasis Fort Lee in Virginia von Kabul nach Maryland geschafft. Obwohl er mit seiner Frau und seinen fünf Kindern wohlbehalten ankam, blieben seine Eltern und Schwestern in Dschalalabad.

„Ich bin hier sehr glücklich“, sagte Masoon, „aber mit meiner Familie bin ich nicht glücklich.“

Er fügte hinzu: „Die Taliban sind in Dschalalabad, und was kann ich in dieser Situation tun? Es ist wirklich eine gefährliche Sache.”

Masoon sagte, er habe seit seiner Abreise aus Afghanistan vor weniger als zwei Wochen jeglichen Kontakt zu ihnen verloren.

Eileen Sullivan, Jennifer Steinhauer, Michael D. Shear, Eric Schmitt, Catie Edmondson und Lara Jakes steuerten die Berichterstattung aus Washington bei.

Categories
Entertainment

Worry Avenue: Kiana Madeira Shares BTS Horror Sequence Particulars

Image source: Netflix

“Hello is someone there?” Usually the last lines are the characters brave enough to go looking for a masked serial killer. In honor of the publication of Angststrasse: 1984, the first film on Netflix Scared street Trilogy, inspired by the book series RL Stine, Kiana Madeira sat down with POPSUGAR to explain how her character Deena overcomes typical horror film stereotypes in the best way.

“She’s a true heroine … There’s something so empowering about playing characters like her, especially when she’s not just a young woman, but a young colored woman and a queer young woman.”

“I was drawn to Deena because she is so passionate,” said Madeira. “She is extremely loyal, she is ready to go through such extremes to protect the people she loves. And that’s something I’ve really connected with. She is fearless. She is a true heroine … not just being a young woman, but a young colored woman and a queer young woman. “

Filmed entirely in the summer of 2019, the trilogy follows Deena and her friends as they set out to put an end to a 300-year-old curse that has supernaturally ravaged their small town. As Deena, Madeira leads the way, staying strong and resilient as she helps her friends escape bloody horror scenes while also coping with her own relationship with her friend Samantha, played by Olivia Scott Welch. Off-screen, the co-stars would often hear Tracy Chapman’s “Fast Car,” a song that captured their on-screen relationship perfectly. “That was a song we used a lot to delve into our circumstances,” she said. “And even now, when I hear this song, I think about the characters we’re playing in Scared street and it is very important to me. “

FEAR STREET PART 1: 1994 - (LR) KIANA MADEIRA as DEENA, FRED HECHINGER as SIMON, BENJAMIN FLORES JR.  as JOSH, JULIA REHWALD as KATE and OLIVIA WELCH as SAM.  Cr: Netflix © 2021Image source: Netflix

Although filming is complete, Madiera says that in her group chat she still stays in touch with her co-stars, including Benji Flores Jr. “Benji, who plays my younger brother in the film, feels like he’s in real life actually my little brother is. I love him so much, “she said, adding that alongside Ashley Zukerman, aka Sheriff Nick, he was also one of the biggest jokes on the set that led the cast to believe he was the only actor in a Set was supposed to pose by action hero dolls. “He was so serious about his delivery that we really didn’t know whether he was telling the truth or not,” she recalled.

The trilogy is a mish-mash of all of our favorite slasher films and is inspired by dynamic’s friendship dynamics The goonieswho have favourited The Terrible Events of M. Night Shyamalan The village, and the nostalgic 90s horror of movies like movies Scream and Nightmare on Elm Street. “You will find little Easter eggs that will definitely call you back to the classic horror scenarios,” Madeira said, adding that the creepy movie elements are no joke, especially when it comes to running away from the supernatural villains. “It’s not just like we’re doing three casual films; it’s three horror films and there are some crazy things going on in them. So it was pretty physically demanding, which I enjoyed.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clZK2PqLWpI

Madeira who is a big fan of the goose bumps Growing Up Books also mentioned that RL Stine stopped by one day during filming to share his praise and give everyone a dose of nostalgia. “He’s so amazing and supportive,” she said. “He told me he couldn’t imagine a better person playing Deena. And I thought, ‘Oh my god, this means so much to me.’ He was really encouraging to all of us, and he had such a calm demeanor too, which made it a lot less intimidating because he’s like a childhood hero to so many of us. Meeting him was a great experience. “

“I think something unexpected is that there really is a love story at the core of all three films.”

While Fear Street: 1994 is an adventure 1978 is full of heartache, and 1666 is “extremely dark”, the trilogy itself fits together wonderfully. At its core, Madeira reveals Scared street is a love story that for once focuses on LGBTQ + characters as heroes and brings an unexpected love and hope to an otherwise chilling series. “I think something unexpected is that there really is a love story at the core of all three films. I haven’t seen that too often in horror, and that love story is strong enough to last through all three films… It’s strong “It’s powerful, it’s authentic, and it’s unconventional compared to what we often see on screen.”

On a scale from 1-10, Madeira is considered a trilogy Scared street 10/10 in terms of scary, indicating that the third film is their favorite because of the dark, twisted plot and the imagination it takes to mentally go back to 1666.[Director Leigh Janiak] Doesn’t shy away from showing the horror, which in my opinion definitely pushes [the movies] “Plus, the things these kids go through are really scary, and I think it’s great that the pictures go hand in hand with that … I think real horror fans will be very happy.”

Image source: Brendan Wixted

Categories
Entertainment

Who Was Gossip Lady within the Guide Collection?

As we anxiously await the Gossip Girl reboot coming to HBO Max, we have plenty of time to reflect on the original Gossip Girl — no, not the 2000s show starring Leighton Meester and Blake Lively, the book series written by Cecily Von Ziegesar. This YA book series is what the first show was based on, although it features some notable differences (like, um, Blair has a brother? What?). One main question you might have: who was Gossip Girl in the books? As someone who devoured this book series in the early aughts, consider me your resident GG expert. Keep reading for the 4-1-1 (note: spoiler alerts ahead).

So, unless you lived under a rock or just subconsciously banished it from your memory, everyone knows that Dan Humphrey was behind the sassy online blogger Gossip Girl in the TV series (I’m honestly still reeling from that, although now that Penn Badgley is Joe from You, it all makes a little more sense).

Von Ziegesar’s book series is similar to the TV shows in many aspects — they are both set on the Upper East Side in New York City, where Serena, Blair, Chuck, Nate, Jenny, Dan, and other attends lavish parties, dabble in partying and drugs, and have more steamy hookups than any teenager should be allowed. Oh, and the drama! It is just as ever-present through the pages of the books, I’m happy to report. But the biggest difference? Gossip Girl is never actually revealed! Wait, what? Yes, it’s true. All through 11 books in the series, from Gossip Girl to Don’t You Forget About Me, plus the bonus holiday-themed book and the Psycho Killer edition of book one (LOL!), the true identity of the mysterious Gossip Girl is never once revealed. Maybe that’s because all the characters took turns playing her? You’ll never know . . .

The good news is, Kristen Bell is returning as the voice of Gossip Girl, so all is right in the world, no matter who is revealed to be behind the moniker this time. Time will only tell. You know you love it, XOXO!

Categories
Entertainment

Meet the Solid of Netflix’s Zero Sequence

If you haven’t checked out zero Please do yourself one more favor on Netflix and check it out ASAP. The action series debuted on April 21st and made history as the first Italian show to feature a predominantly black cast in the spotlight. Created by author Antonio Dikele Distefano, zero follows a shy young man named Zero / Omar who discovers he can become invisible. As a result, he teams up with a group of neighborhood children and uses his superpower to try to save Milan’s Barrio neighborhood from gentrification. The show features a cast of talented newcomers including Giuseppe Dave Seke and Dylan Magon, as well as familiar faces like Beatrice Grannò, Virginia Diop and Madior Fall. Get to know the rest of the zero throw ahead.

Categories
Entertainment

See the Shameless Forged’s Goodbye Posts For Sequence Finale

It’s the end of an era. April 11th is Showtime Shameless ends after 11 seasons and a lot of drama within the Gallagher family. The cast have practically grown up together over the past 10 years, and their goodbye messages show how much the series meant to them. Actors Emma Kenney, Cameron Monaghan, Steve Howey, William H. Macy and others recognized all of the work that went on their show on Instagram with behind-the-scenes photos and wrap party pictures.

Monaghan summed it up best when he wrote, “It’s the end of the day. You don’t have to go home, but you can’t stay here. Thank you for coming with us.” Take a look at the cast’s sentimental notes. We’re already counting down the days before we can get the entire series back on Netflix.

Categories
Business

Your important information to all-new motorsport collection

Legendary off-road racer and YouTube star Ken Block is preparing to take the wheel of the Extreme Es E-SUV to take part in the 2020 Dakar Grand Prix of Qiddiya finals on January 17, 2020.

FRANCK FIFE | AFP | Getty Images

The first season of a one-of-a-kind, brand new motorsport, Extreme E, kicks off live on Sky Sports this weekend.

Don’t you know what it’s about? Then read on – here are all the key questions Sky Sports host David Garrido answered.

So what exactly is this “Extreme E”?

Extreme E is an exciting new motorsport that drives fully electric SUVs off-road in five different locations in different, challenging terrain. These venues are located in some of the most remote places on earth and were chosen because these locations have been destroyed by the effects of climate change.

In addition to the sporting spectacle, Extreme E is intended to consciously highlight the destruction of the planet and inspire people, companies and locations to take positive steps in the area of ​​climate protection. The use of electric vehicles is part of the solution and offers teams and manufacturers the opportunity to test and showcase their latest automotive technology.

This sport comes from Alejandro Agag, a Spanish businessman who previously worked in Formula 1 with drivers like Romain Grosjean and who also founded Formula E, the all-electric single-seater series in the city center.

Who is involved

There are nine teams, each with one driver and one driver (gender equality is another pillar of Extreme E), including famous names from many different motor sports.

We have three Formula 1 world champions as team owners – Lewis Hamilton (X44), Nico Rosberg (Rosberg X Racing) and Jenson Button (JBXE), who is also a driver himself.

Also in the driver line-up are the former world rally champion Sébastien Loeb, who won nine titles in a row between 2004 and 2012, and the two-time winner Carlos Sainz, who has three rally crowns at the Dakar.

Rallycross is mainly represented by the Swedish trio Johan Kristoffersson, Timmy Hansen and Mattias Ekström, who together have won the last five world championship titles.

Jamie Chadwick is the current Williams F1 W-Series Champion and development driver, while Catie Munnings won the Ladies Trophy at the 2016 European Rally Championship. The other Briton involved is Oli Bennett, who won seven of them nine races in the 2017 British Rallycross Championship.

Behind the scenes there are further F1 connections with Zak Brown, CEO of McLaren Racing, as team principal of Andretti United, while Adrian Newey, Chief Technical Officer at Red Bull Racing, and ex-driver Jean-Eric Vergne are both with Veloce Racing.

How does the race work?

The entire action takes place over two days. On Saturday, all teams will complete two qualifying runs of the course, with the male and female riders doing one lap each, with a switch (known as “The Switch”) in between. Each of these runs will be approximately 18 kilometers and their combined times will make an order.

From this order, the fastest three teams will advance to the first semi-final on Sunday, the middle three teams will compete in another semi-final called the “Crazy Race”, and the slowest three teams will race in “The Shootout”. From this first semi-final onwards, the two best drivers reach the final, together with the winner of the Crazy Race. In the final, the winner of the race is simply crowned the XPrix winner.

Points are awarded by placement when you move from first (XPrix winner) to ninth (third finisher in ‘The Shootout’).

There are other unique features that spice up the race even further, such as ‘Hyperdrive’: if you take the longest jump on the first jump of each race, you get an extra speed boost and that team gets an additional championship point.

There will be no fans at the races (to keep the carbon footprint of the series to a minimum), but with the “Gridplay” function they can vote for their favorite driver to gain a head start. The team that receives the most votes can choose its starting position for the final. However, if it is not there, it can give its votes to another team of its choice. The team with the second highest votes will receive the second choice of starting place and so on.

As part of Extreme E’s sustainability offensive, each vote also includes a micropayment for the Master Charity / Legacy Program. (Later more.)

Where are the venues for the races?

Buckle up, this is going to be a pretty global expedition.

There are five different venues for the Extreme E inaugural season races, each dealing with different remote locations and related environmental issues. You start in AlUla in Saudi Arabia for the Desert XPrix at the beginning of April and drive to Lac Rose in Senegal for the Ocean XPrix at the end of May.

Then at the end of August there is a break of about three months before the third round in Greenland at the Russell Glacier near Kangerlussuaq (Arctic XPrix), and after that we head south – to Santa Maria, Belterra in the Brazilian region of Pará for the Amazon XPrix in October and finally Tierra del Fuego in Argentina for the XPrix glacier in mid-December.

Read more stories from Sky Sports

What is the car you are using?

It’s called the Odyssey 21, and it’s essentially an oversized electric buggy. The vehicle is made by Spark Racing Technology, and there is also a Formula 1 stake here, with McLaren providing the drivetrain and Williams providing the electric battery, while Continental supplies the tires. It was unveiled to the public at the Goodwood Festival of Speed ​​in June 2019 and then had a neat run-out at the Dakar Rally in Saudi Arabia in January 2020, with Ken Block finishing third in the vehicle category on the final stage. Not a bad debut.

The fact that it is electric matters not only to the way it is driven, but most importantly to the weight. It’s an animal that weighs 1,650 kilograms and is 2.3 meters wide, and yet it speeds up to 60 miles per hour in just 4.5 seconds. With 550 horsepower, the Odyssey 21 can reach a top speed of 120 mph and climb inclines of up to 130 percent.

Very minimal changes to the cars can be made by teams that are essentially limited to the bodywork, but of course each team has its own specific paint scheme. As an electric SUV, it is far quieter than its gasoline or diesel equivalent with a combustion engine, but it also has instant torque and very fast acceleration. The drivers I spoke to have also praised the handling, but one told me that one of the challenges is just getting the thing to stop … because of its weight.

How are the batteries in the cars charged? They also have a low-carbon solution for this: hydrogen fuel cells. This innovative idea by the British company AFC Energy uses water and sun to produce hydrogen. Not only will this process not cause greenhouse gas emissions, its only by-product will be water that will be used elsewhere on site.

Do you want a fun fact about the car? Of course you do. Let’s go: The energy stored in the Odyssey 21’s battery could charge 2,600 cell phones for a week.

How do the cars get to the venues?

Aha! This is another twist, and perhaps one of the series’ most important USPs.

You will be transported from venue to venue aboard the RMS St. Helena, a former Royal Mail passenger cargo ship that has undergone a major overhaul to make it Extreme E’s operations center.

But moving cars isn’t their only use. The St. Helena will not only serve as a “floating paddock”, but will also carry all other necessary equipment to the race venues, house a crew of 50 and laboratory for scientists to conduct valuable research on climate change and marine pollution and the legacy program the championship (more on that later) and contribute to its sustainability.

By choosing the seas above the sky, Extreme E’s logistical carbon footprint is reduced by two thirds compared to air freight travel. And there are other examples too. The ship’s drive units and generators are powered by low-sulfur diesel. St. Helena uses energy-saving LED lights, low-consumption bathroom fittings and even chairs made from recycled plastic bottles from the Mediterranean. Every little bit helps.

FALMOUTH, ENGLAND – FEBRUARY 25: The St. Helena cargo ship docked in Falmouth, England on February 25, 2021.

Hugh R Hastings | Getty Images News | Getty Images

So what are these legacy programs that you mentioned?

In addition to environmental awareness and gender equality, Extreme E also aims to have a noticeable impact and keep the venues in better shape than they were. To this end, it will be involved in local activities so that it can make a significant contribution to the rehabilitation of these areas that have been hit by climate change in different ways.

In Saudi Arabia, for the Desert XPrix, they will support the Great Green Wall initiative, which aims to create a barrier of trees and protective landscapes across the Sahel-Saharan border, and the drivers will also visit a local turtle conservation project. In Senegal, the Legacy Program will help marine protected areas protect and revitalize aquatic diversity and carry out beachfront initiatives on Dakar Beach. The drivers will help plant mangroves – a million trees are to be planted on 60 hectares.

Same goes for Greenland, where Extreme E will support the territory’s plans to move entirely to 100% clean energy sources and partner with UNICEF Greenland to educate children about the effects of climate change. the Amazon, where they are working with existing conservation organizations to protect and replant an area with agroforestry and provide crops that can be harvested by locals; and finally the southern tip of Argentina, where the ice is receding at an alarming rate. If this continues, most, if not all, of the Cirque glaciers in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego will disappear over the next two decades, and both valley glaciers and Patagonian ice sheets will also be greatly reduced.

Okay, I’m in. Where can I see Extreme E?

All sessions of all race weekends will be broadcast live on Sky Sports Action and / or Sky Sports Mix and will begin on Saturday, April 3, at 7 a.m. CET with the first qualification from Saudi Arabia.

In addition, Sky will broadcast “Electric Odyssey,” a 20-part epic transglobal magazine show aimed at environmentally conscious audiences with a passion for adventure and helping to bridge the gaps between the five racing laps.

This unique Extreme E-journey is just beginning and is expected to be eight months ahead of us, both on and off the “track”.

Categories
Business

England collapse to T20 collection defeat to India

AHMEDABAD, INDIA – MARCH 20: Shardul Thakur of India celebrates the wicket of Jonny Bairstow of England captured by Suryakumar Yadav during the 5th T20 International between India and England at Narendra Modi Stadium on March 20, 2021 in Ahmedabad, India.

Surjeet Yadav | Getty Images Sports | Getty Images

England collapsed to a 36-run loss to India in the crucial fifth T20 international match in Ahmedabad when the home side took a 3-2 win in the series.

India scored a massive 224-2 from their 20 overs after being reinstated by Eoin Morgan, and although Dawid Malan (68 of 46 balls) and Jos Buttler (52 of 34) both fired in a century, they stand for the second wicket. England eventually collapsed in response to 188-8.

On what is undoubtedly the best club in the series, India has been aggressive from the start. The new opening pair Rohit Sharma (64 of 34 balls) and Virat Kohli (80 of 52 balls) played 94 and achieved a rate of more than 10 over.

Both went through well into the 1950s, while Suryakumar Yadav (32 of 17) and Hardik Pandya (39 of 17) stepped in late with rapid-fire cameos – the former’s innings only ended with a jaw-dropping season frontier catch from Chris Jordan.

Jason Roy (0) went to the second ball of the English chase, which was bowled cleanly by Bhuvneswhar Kumar (2-15). He later returned to win Buttler’s key wicket in a 13th that cost only three runs and turned the game in India’s favor.

Buttler’s dismissal was the first of seven wickets to fall for 44 runs as England stumbled on their way to a series defeat.

Morgan had previously been successful in the throw, and although the English skipper lost the fourth T20 on Thursday when he chased and faced a belting track, he had no hesitation in asking India again to strike first.

But a change at the top of the order for India had the desired effect. After the out of shape KL Rahul fell, Kohli set out to open up to Rohit, who had returned to his best performance in the power play.

Rohit warned both his intent and good form as he crossed two boundaries through the ceiling of Jofra Archers second and then started Adil Rashid (1-31) over the deep midwicket fence in third.

That was one of five highs in Rohit’s breathtaking stroke when India smashed 60 out of six-over power play and he ran 30 balls for up to half a century.

Ben Stokes (1-26) made for the decisive breakthrough for England and fooled Rohit for the pace with a cutter that rattled into his stumps. But any hopes that the wicket would stall the Indian innings were soon dashed when Suryakumar – fresh from firing fifty in his first T20I innings – blew Rashid and Jordan three consecutive boundaries on the next run occupied the 12th.

Jordan would take revenge with a ridiculous frontier catch only to see Suryakumar’s back not long after. He sprinted around the deep midwicket fence for an effortless one-handed catch before passing it on to the observing (and laughing in amazement) Jason Roy as Jordan’s swing led him over the rope.

Read more stories from Sky Sports

Kohli, who was happy to play second fiddle up to that point – having had only 31 deliveries by the end of the 14th – he stepped on the gas with Pandya at the back of the Indian innings.

The pair put on 78 in the last six overs, with Kohli crossing to a 28th T20I fifty and Pandya, who battled the short ball during the series, this time holding onto something that slammed halfway – the all-rounder sent two of those Deliveries from Jordan passed the distance in the 19th.

AHMEDABAD, INDIA – MARCH 20: Shardul Thakur of India (C) celebrates Chris Jordan of England’s wicket with Virat Kohli during the 5th T20 International between India and England at Narendra Modi Stadium on March 20, 2021 in Ahmedabad, India .

Surjeet Yadav | Getty Images Sports | Getty Images

In the hunt for such a stiff target, England’s innings had got off to a worst start when Roy was sent off by Bhuvneshwar for the second ball looking for the big swing to the deep Midwicket line.

Malan, his place on this English page under pressure, came out swinging and Looted 14 runs of three balls in Pandya’s second over.

Meanwhile, Butler found Rahul Chahar to his liking and smashed the leg spinner for three of his four sixes when he and Malan fired 62 off the power play en route to a good century score.

Malan raced through to a 33-ball-fifty while Buttler produced half a century of his own 30 deliveries, though then ran off with a long long-off in Bhuvneshwar’s 13th game.

This proved to be a turning point in the game. Jonny Bairstow (7), Morgan (1) and Ben Stokes (14) were all cheaply laid off when the rate required rose dramatically. Malan was one of three who fell on Shardul Thakur (3 -45).

Categories
Entertainment

Filmmakers Take a look at Woody Allen Abuse Allegations in 4-Half Sequence

Documentary filmmakers Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering have shed light on sexual abuse allegations in institutions such as the military for the past decade in The Invisible War (2012). Colleges, in “The Hunting Ground” (2015); and the music industry in “On the Record” (2020). Now they target Dylan Farrow’s decades of sexual abuse allegations against her adoptive father Woody Allen.

“Allen v. Farrow” is a four-part documentary that will be released later this month. It introduces viewers to Farrow’s public experience of accusing a famous and powerful man of abuse, but also includes details of the case that were not shared with the public.

At first, Farrow’s story didn’t fit in with the usual broad-based research by Dick and Ziering, but on closer inspection, the filmmakers found they had an opportunity to discuss family child abuse and incest, a topic that survivors consistently urged the two to address .

“I was haunted by these stories,” said Ziering. “That is the third track. Nobody talks about it. “

Everyone is talking about Woody Allen and Mia Farrow, however. The former Hollywood power couple were together for 12 years. They never married and had separate apartments, made 13 films together, adopted and had two children (Dylan and Moses) another (Satchel who changed his name to Ronan after his parents separated). They were the talk of the town until everything collapsed in 1992. Over the course of eight months, Farrow discovered nude photos of college-age daughter Soon-Yi Previn in Allen’s apartment. That summer, 7-year-old Dylan said Allen sexually assaulted her. These allegations resulted in an ugly custody battle and a permanently torn family apart. Allen has consistently denied the allegations and has not been charged with a crime following investigations in Connecticut and New York.

With the media fully focused on the scandal for so many years, Dick said he believed he knew the story and was initially reluctant to delve further. “It’s been covered so extensively and a lot of our work goes into new cases,” he said. “But when we got involved, we found that there was a lot more. We turned around finding that the whole story had never come out. “

The filmmakers, along with Amy Herdy, the producer who led the investigation, spent three years tracking down court documents and police reports, and conducting extensive interviews with many witnesses who had never spoken to the public before.

The series begins February 21 on HBO and includes a home video of Mia Farrow growing up in Connecticut, as well as audio recordings she secretly taped from some conversations with everyone. And for the first time, we see 7-year-old Dylan’s videotape, taped immediately after Farrow’s allegations. The ribbon has become a hot button over the past two decades. One side is evidence of her truthfulness and the other side is evidence that Farrow coached her daughter in her responses. The filmmakers also raise questions about an important report from the Yale Child Sexual Abuse Clinic at Yale-New Haven Hospital that found Dylan incredible after nine interviews within seven months.

Neither Allen, Soon-Yi Previn nor Moses Farrow participated in the documentary. (The majority of Farrow’s other living children did so.) They declined to comment on the series that they had not yet seen.

I asked Dick and Ziering why they decided to get involved. You will find edited excerpts from our conversation below.

For so long this story has been told the way he said – it told a family drama in which many people declared, “We will never know the truth.”

Amy Ziering If you dig closer you see he said it, he said, he said, he said, he said, he said, she said [whispered]he said, he said, he said, he said. But we didn’t know. Nobody knew. If you get this echo chamber from a certain perspective and narrative, you will not recognize the source. That was interesting when we unpacked it. And when we started listening to the “She Said” part and checking out the “He Said” part, it got extremely interesting.

Since the beginning of the #MeToo movement, Allen has been ostracized in a number of ways: Amazon has canceled its film contract for several pictures. His latest film has not yet found US distribution. The first editor of his memoirs resigned. Some actors have said that they will no longer work with him in the future. Why publish this documentary now?

ZIERING Our goal is never the perpetrator. It is more about us all understanding these crimes, how we all participate in these crimes, and I mean all of us, both funny and unknowing. It’s also about how to talk about something that happens all the time in America that no one is comfortable with. This is not the full exploration of it. It’s a way of getting people to think about it.

THICK As with “On the Record,” where people need to know what happens when a person decides to come forward and immediately afterwards, this is built into the experience of the people involved. So it’s not just about someone being accused.

Whether by the media or by everyone himself, Farrow has long been portrayed as unstable? Was that your perception of her and has that changed?

THICK I just want to say that the suspicion and criticism that mothers have in this society in general are just evidence of misogyny. People like to blame mothers for anything. From the beginning I was very suspicious of this narrative because it is a misogynist narrative – the idea of ​​the hysterical woman, the crazy woman. This is what not only happens with incest, which is done quite often, but also with sexual assault. Hearing that made me very, very suspicious.

ZIERING There are amazing wills [to Farrow] and people will see the home videos Mia has made of her children all her life. We have received a lot of love and praise from the people we interviewed about their qualities as mothers.

Wasn’t Dylan ready to give you the tape of her at the age of 7, the tape that has been at the center of this controversy for so long?

ZIERING It took Dylan a long time to feel comfortable and secure in sharing this video. And once she shared it, there were parameters about whether she’d be okay with us actually using it. It was incremental. We are not concerned with contributing to the pain of others.

At the end of the documentary, Mia says she’s still scared of Woody and is actually worried about what he’s going to do when he sees this series. Then why did she choose to participate? What was your goal?

ZIERING She didn’t want to be part of it. She did this for her daughter Dylan. In fact, in the interview you see her in, she’s in my shirt. I literally had to borrow someone else’s shirt and give her my shirt because when she showed up she didn’t want to do the interview, she was so unhappy. What did she wear? I don’t even remember.

She said, “My daughter came up to me and said it was important to me and you must do this for me.” And she said, “I stand by my children. I will take the incoming fire. I don’t know you, Amy. I don’t know Kirby. I know your work. I was angry because I didn’t do anything. ”

The series examines the Yale-New Haven clinic in depth. From the frequency with which the clinicians interviewed Dylan to the fact that any timely interview notes from those sessions were destroyed when the final report was published. In your previous sexual abuse research, have you ever seen a situation where such notes were destroyed?

THICK I had not. It’s really shocking that notes get destroyed, but that’s one of the reasons the whole story never came out. If everything had been transparent, we wouldn’t have made this series.

How actively did you try to reach out to Soon-Yi, Moses, and Woody? Have you ever got an answer from any of them?

THICK We have definitely achieved. We didn’t expect them to speak. If we were to make a movie about Woody Allen’s career, he probably wouldn’t be talking to us. It didn’t surprise us.

Were there any threats of lawsuits or anything else from the Allen camp when you put this together?

THICK No. We are always careful when verifying facts. We went to great lengths to ensure accuracy.

ZIERING As always. We never had to withdraw a fact. Legally, it would have been easier to adapt a book or write a story about someone who is already convicted. This way you won’t be in front of a moving train. But unfortunately we actually run in front of moving trains. The only thing that can save us is truth and extreme caution. We are not dead yet.

Categories
Business

Woody Allen documentary sequence coming to HBO

Director Woody Allen will start shooting a new film in San Sebastián on July 9, 2019.

Europa Press News | Getty Images

The story of Woody Allen’s infamous relationship with Mia Farrow and her family is explored in a four-part documentary on HBO.

Directed by Oscar-nominated documentary filmmakers Kirby Dick and Amy Ziering, the series entitled “Allen v. Farrow” delves into one of Hollywood’s most public scandals – allegations that Allen sexually abused his then 7-year-old adopted daughter, Dylan . Allen has repeatedly denied the claim.

In the bitter custody battle that followed, it was found that Allen had a relationship with Farrow’s adopted daughter Soon-Yi Previn. Allen eventually married Previn.

HBO will debut the first episode of the series on February 21. New episodes will be broadcast on the following Sundays.

The series is reminiscent of HBO’s involvement in the Michael Jackson documentary “Leaving Neverland,” as both were shot in secret. Jackson was accused of pedophilia prior to his death in 2009. He denied the allegations.

Categories
Entertainment

Michael Apted, Versatile Director Identified for ‘Up’ Sequence, Dies at 79

“The biggest social revolution in my life growing up in England was changing the role of women in society,” he said. “We didn’t have civil rights and Vietnam in England, but I think that one particular social revolution is the biggest thing and I missed it because I didn’t have enough women. And because I didn’t have enough women, I didn’t have enough choice about what options women had, who had careers, had families, and all those things. “

He continued, “If you look at everything from ‘Agatha’ to ‘Coal Miner’s Daughter’, from ‘Nell’ and ‘Continental Divide’, they all have to do with the role of women in society and what women need to do to be a role in society or the choices women must make in order to stay in society or have a voice in society, both in simple and eccentric ways. I always care. And that, I think, comes from feeling like I missed something. “

Michael David Apted was born on February 10, 1941 in Aylesbury, Central England and grew up near London. His father, Ronald, worked for an insurance company, and his mother, Frances, was “some kind of die-hard socialist” who instilled a liberal attitude, as he told The Progressive in 2013.

From the age of ten he attended the renowned City of London School, commuted to the city by underground and then studied history and law at the University of Cambridge. His friends included fellow student John Cleese, who later joined the Monty Python Troupe, and he worked on theater productions with Trevor Nunn, Mike Newell and Stephen Frears, all of whom had prominent directorial careers. He took part in a trainee program in Granada and was soon working on “Seven Up!”.

When this film aired in May 1964, the reaction terrified him.

“The first,” he told The Times in 2019, “was extremely successful.” It was the truth of the class system from the mouths of babes, and the whole country was shocked – people were just blown away by the cracks in English society on celluloid. “