Categories
Politics

Biden enterprise allies assist White Home woo non-public sector in local weather change push

President Joe Biden’s allies in business have helped the White House persuade the private sector to support the government’s climate change agenda.

Several business leaders working with the White House told CNBC that the effort is a huge departure from what they saw during the Trump administration.

For example, executives say they are less concerned about a tweet from the president when trying to push a new climate policy. Former President Donald Trump was known for targeting companies that appeared to oppose him on key issues.

“There is no longer any fear of the tweet, which I believe was a legitimate fear for many business leaders to speak up on these issues,” said Hugh Welsh, president of DSM North America, of which the group is CEO Climate Dialogue, said CNBC on Monday.

Biden has proposed a more aggressive climate policy than his predecessor. Trump pulled the US out of the Paris Climate Agreement in 2017 and, among other things, repealed the Obama-era regulations for methane gas, which could ultimately harm the environment. Biden reintroduced the US to the Paris Climate Agreement on his inauguration day.

Biden has also made tackling climate change a key part of his $ 2 trillion infrastructure plan. Biden’s proposal calls for a $ 174 billion investment in the electric vehicle market. It’s all part of the president’s goal to bring the country to net zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Tom Steyer, a billionaire who ran for president during the Democratic primary, is among several business leaders who have actively involved the White House and government leaders in their climate proposals.

Steyer spoke with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and White House climate advisor Gina McCarthy about the need to work with the private sector on what is likely to be one of the president’s most expensive initiatives, according to a person with direct knowledge of the matter.

Steyer spent millions to defeat Trump and has invested in climate change initiatives. He has a net worth of $ 1.4 billion, according to Forbes.

Steyer was also a speaker at Morgan Stanley’s annual climate change conference. Steyer told executives and investors at the meeting that they shouldn’t invest in fossil fuel companies to fight climate change.

This person declined to be called to discuss private matters. Morgan Stanley representatives have not returned requests for comment. The White House did not respond to a request for comment prior to publication.

The Chamber of Commerce and the CEO Climate Dialogue have also engaged the White House in climate initiatives. The chamber rejects Biden’s plan to increase corporate taxes, but supports an infrastructure overhaul.

The CEO Climate Dialogue has nearly two dozen members, including companies from Wall Street and the energy sector. The organization aims to promote private sector use and a more market-oriented approach to secure net zero emissions by 2050.

Climate Dialogue’s CEO Welsh told CNBC that the group had contacted the White House in Biden to improve relationships with corporate executives.

“The group was involved with Gina McCarthy and a few others to rebuild relationships with the White House after the last four years,” said Welsh.

Marty Durbin, president of the US Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute, told CNBC the group had contacted McCarthy and Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm.

Durbin said the chamber was trying to encourage Granholm and members of Congress to fully fund climate-based research and development projects. The group has also tried to encourage the new administration to work with the private sector on green policy proposals.

“We need to figure out how we can enable the private sector to fund, use and commercialize these technologies. That is how we will see emissions reductions at the end of the day,” said Durbin.

Members of a fundraising group called Clean Energy for Biden also act as a bridge to the private sector. Dan Reicher, co-chair of the organization, told CNBC that he had prepared a spending proposal to increase energy production from the country’s dams.

The document, which was sent to the White House and approved by nearly a dozen organizations and trade associations, states that only 2,500 of the roughly 90,000 dams in the US generate electricity. The proposal is valued at over $ 60 billion over 10 years.

“If this $ 63.07 billion proposal is fully implemented over a 10-year period, around 500,000 well-paying jobs will be created, more than 32,000 kilometers of rivers restored to improve climate resilience, and more than 80 gigawatts of existing ones secure renewable hydropower and 23 gigawatts. ” Electricity storage “, it says in the proposal.

It also called on Biden to order the establishment of a committee to vote on dam improvements and regulatory issues.

According to Reicher, the draft was sent to Phil Giudice and David Hayes, two of Biden’s climate policy advisors and members of Congress, among others.

The Clean Energy for Biden group is evolving into 501 (c) (3) and 501 (c) (4) nonprofits, both of which are referred to as Clean Energy for America, Reicher added.

The Clean Energy for America website states that while Biden’s climate change agenda is supported, it will also “support candidates at the federal, state and local levels by fundraising, mobilizing the workforce for clean energy, and providing early resource availability.”

Categories
Business

Mexico Set to Reshape Energy Sector to Favor the State

MEXICO CITY – President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has never lacked criticism of his predecessor’s legacy. But he reserved a particular disdain for the major overhaul that opened Mexico’s strained energy industry to the private sector.

He has called the changes a form of legalized “looting,” the product of corruption and resounding failure. He has suggested that some foreign energy investors are “looting” the nation and that Mexican lawyers who work for them are guilty of treason.

He is now formalizing his most aggressive attack on the measures to date.

A bill is expected to be passed in the next few days to strengthen the dominance of the Mexican state-owned electricity company. The measure, recently approved by the Mexican Congress with the firm support of Mr López Obrador, would also limit the participation of private investors in the energy sector. Both effects are of central importance for his long-term goal of restoring energy self-sufficiency and securing Mexican sovereignty.

Mexico’s reliance on foreign hydrocarbons was highlighted last month when a winter storm in Texas disrupted supplies of natural gas from the United States, the source of most of the natural gas used in Mexico. Mr López Obrador pointed to the resulting blackouts as evidence of the need to reduce dependence on foreign energy.

However, the legislation, hastened by the Mexican Congress by Mr López Obrador’s party, has been criticized by opposition lawmakers, environmentalists, industry analysts, Mexican and international corporate groups, and even Mexico’s antitrust watchdog almost everywhere.

Many critics see the bill as a political move to excite the president’s grassroots ahead of the June midterm elections, through which Mr López Obrador hopes to turn his party’s congressional majority into the super-majority required to amend the constitution.

Opponents of the legislation say that not only would it not revitalize the energy sector or help achieve energy independence, it would violate Mexico’s international commitments to reduce carbon emissions, violate trade deals, and further cool foreign investment in Mexico struggles to regain economic dynamism amid the pandemic.

Legislation also threatens to re-grasp the relationship between Mr López Obrador’s administrations and President Biden, which got off to a rocky start when the Mexican President became one of the last world leaders to congratulate Mr Biden on his election victory.

“I think the effects of this reform are a big reversal,” said Lourdes Melgar, who was a senior energy official in the administration of Enrique Peña Nieto, the predecessor of Mr López Obrador. The Mexican president, she said, “had a very nationalist view of resource management.”

She added, “He wants to bring private producers to their knees, and we see it in the most absurd way.”

Jeremy M. Martin, vice president of energy and sustainability at the Institute of the Americas, a public order think tank in San Diego, said the legislation is likely to resonate with supporters of Mr López Obrador, who have been made feel like it finally have a president who puts the Mexican people first.

“It doesn’t make economic sense, but it makes a lot of sense for people who feel like they’ve been screwed in Mexico for years,” he said. “It’s pure ideology, it’s political.”

The legislation would rewrite the rules for the electricity sector. Among other things, this would change the so-called shipping rules, which regulate the order in which plants feed their electricity into the national grid, and give higher priority to the plants of the state electricity company, the Federal Electricity Commission.

The energy market liberalization approved by Mexican legislators in 2014 gave priority to low-cost power generation, with increasing preference for solar and wind power plants, which led to an increase in private investments from Mexico and abroad in the renewable energy sector.

However, the new legislation restores preferences for government fossil fuel plants, which generate electricity at higher costs and cause higher CO2 emissions.

Mr López Obrador and his allies have argued that the bill seeks to correct a trend in the 2014 overhaul that gave private companies an unfair advantage.

“We level the ground, we establish clear rules, we prioritize national security,” said Rocío Abreu Artiñano, Senator of the ruling Morena Party and President of the Energy Commission of the Mexican Senate.

The current system, she said, “stifles” the Federal Electricity Commission.

When more than 4.5 million homes and businesses in northern Mexico lost electricity last month after Arctic weather froze cross-border pipelines and the Texas governor issued an order restricting natural gas exports, López Obrador said it was a lesson the need for energy independence.

Gas-fired power plants generate more than half of Mexico’s electricity. According to the Mexican government, the vast majority of natural gas is imported, with the majority coming from the United States.

“We always have to look for self-sufficiency and produce what we consume in Mexico: food, energy,” said López Obrador in mid-February when Mexico was recovering from the blackouts.

However, analysts and industry leaders say that although Mr López Obrador insists on moving Mexico to greater energy independence, the new legislation could actually make the nation more dependent on foreign energy sources by increasing reliance on fossil fuels, which it has to import .

While household energy bills are likely to remain isolated from price increases from government subsidies, industrial users could see an increase in electricity bills that they would likely pass on to their customers, analysts said.

“This has no economic logic,” said Víctor Ramírez Cabrera, spokesman for the Mexico, Climate and Energy Platform, a research group in Mexico City. He called the new model for power sourcing “absurd”.

Environmentalists and other critics have also devastated the legislation, saying it will undo hard-fought gains in cutting carbon emissions and put Mexico on a course that contradicts global efforts to combat climate change and goes against its international treaties and possibly his violates own laws.

Mr López Obrador said the government was planning to upgrade its hydropower plants, which will be given a higher priority under the new energy supply system, to help meet its climate change commitments. However, critics of the legislation are deeply skeptical.

“Under these conditions there is no way to keep the Paris Agreement,” said Ramírez. “Just give it up for dead.”

Equally worrying, critics say, is the negative impact of the legislation on FDI in Mexico. The law would essentially hamper many private renewable energy companies that have invested since the energy sector opened up and cripple their chances of making a profit.

“It’s going to hit them big and hard,” said Gonzalo Monroy, a Mexico City-based energy consultant.

Investors “came to invest in the country, trusting the rules and the law,” said Xóchitl Gálvez Ruiz, senator of the opposition National Action Party. “Overnight they are told, ‘You know what? I don’t like that, I’ll change the rules. ‘”

Analysts and industry experts say litigation against the law is inevitable, including potential challenges on the grounds that doing so may violate clauses in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada deal that replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement.

The legislation is just the latest what analysts say is a string of foreign investment violations by Mr Lopez Obrador, including the cancellation of a $ 13 billion airport project in 2018 and the lockdown of a partially built brewery in northern Mexico last year .

After the Senate approved the new law last week, the peso fell to a four-month low against the dollar. And a Reuters poll found the currency could be unpredictable for a few months, partly due to energy transition concerns.

“Investment levels are falling and nobody wants to invest here,” said Israel Tello, a legal analyst at Integralia, a Mexico City-based advisory group. “Legal uncertainty is the deadliest weapon against investment.”