Categories
World News

Russia-Ukraine Warfare: U.S. Will Give $2 Billion Extra Assist, Blinken Says

Recognition…Doug Mills/The New York Times

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken, during a visit to Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital, on Thursday said he would inform Congress that the United States intends to send an additional $2 billion in long-term military assistance to Ukraine and 18 other countries. who are at risk of a Russian invasion.

Separately, President Biden has approved an additional $675 million in military assistance to Ukraine, Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III said.

The combined aid totals $13.5 billion in Biden administration aid to Ukraine since the Russian invasion in February.

Mr. Blinken’s visit to Ukraine’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs was his second since the start of the Russian invasion. The State Department has not publicly announced his trip in advance for security reasons.

His visit comes as Mr. Austin meets with allied defense ministers at a monthly meeting of the Ukraine Contact Group, which aims to coordinate the flow of military aid to Ukraine. The arrival of Western equipment, particularly longer-range HIMARS missile systems, has enabled Ukrainian forces to attack Russian military infrastructure behind front lines and aided a counteroffensive in the south — although some military experts argue aid to date is insufficient to avert this War decided in favor of Ukraine.

“Ukrainian forces have begun their counter-offensive in the south of their country and they are integrating the capabilities that we have all deployed to help themselves fight and retake their sovereign territory,” Mr Austin said at the start of the meeting at Ramstein Air Force Base in Germany.

“This contact group must position itself to provide long-term support to the brave defenders of Ukraine,” he said. “That now means the continuous and determined flow of skills.”

Russian forces are struggling to seize new territory but show no signs of retreating from the invasion, which US estimates have left tens of thousands of casualties on both sides and left vast areas of eastern and southern Ukraine in ruins. On Wednesday, President Vladimir V Putin delivered a defiant address, whitewashing the enormous toll of the war and the faltering performance of his army, and proclaimed at an economic conference in Russia’s Far East: “We have lost nothing and will lose nothing.”

In Germany, Mr Austin said the new weapons package included air-launched HARM missiles designed to seek out and destroy Russian air defense radar; guided multiple launch rocket systems, known as GMLRS; howitzers and other artillery; armored ambulances; and small arms.

The State Department said the $2 billion package, which will be drawn from pools of funds already approved by Congress but whose specific allocation requires Congress approval, would be split roughly half between Ukraine and 18 other nations. These are Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, Georgia, Greece, Kosovo, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia.

The money will be used to “build the current and future capabilities” of the armed forces of Ukraine and other countries, including by strengthening their cyber and hybrid warfare capabilities, particularly to counter Russian aggression, the State Department said.

The money will also help integrate non-NATO members into the alliances’ armed forces.

On Thursday afternoon, Mr Blinken met with Ukraine’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Dmytro Kuleba. He previously visited the US embassy and a children’s hospital that treats children injured in Russian attacks.

Mr Blinken was also introduced to Patron at the hospital, a Jack Russell terrier who Ukrainian forces have credited with helping excavate hundreds of Russian landmines. Mr. Blinken declared the dog “world famous”.

Michael Croley and

Categories
World News

Newest Russia-Ukraine Battle Information: Reside Updates

Recognition…Eleonore Dermy/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

He wrote a book describing a Russian military that was so ill-prepared when invading Ukraine that he didn’t know until he did that his unit had entered the country Awoke to artillery fire.

Now 34-year-old Pavel Filatiev, who says he is a paratrooper in the Russian military, is seeking political asylum in France after arriving there last weekend. He was hailed as a hero by some in the West, his book embraced by Kremlin opponents as evidence of what he called a “terrible war”.

But Mr. Filatiev remains a scourge and a traitor in his native Russia, at least among pro-war advocates who know of its existence, as opponents of the invasion are aggressively censored. Some critics also say his book ignores the strong support for President Vladimir V. Putin and the war among many Russians and Russian soldiers. And some Ukrainians and Russian opponents of the war say he is an unreliable narrator and an accomplice to the violence.

The book has attracted a great deal of attention, partly because of the rarity of a Russian soldier speaking about his experiences. Mr. Filatiev’s account of his time in Ukraine has not been independently verified by the New York Times. Kamalia Mehtiyeva, his lawyer, said he awaits a decision in the coming days on whether he can remain in France as a refugee.

“He fears persecution by the Russian Federation,” she said by phone from Paris.

According to his book, Mr. Filatiev spent about two months as a paratrooper stationed in the southern Ukrainian cities of Kherson and Mykolaiv and contracted an eye infection in a ditch. He then tried to leave the army after being taken to a military hospital in Sevastopol for health reasons. But he writes that he was threatened with prosecution if he didn’t return.

He fled Russia in August after publishing his book ZOV, which refers to the symbols painted on Russian military vehicles, and fled to France via Tunisia.

“We had no moral right to attack another country, especially the people closest to us,” he writes in the book, which he himself published on VKontakte, a Russian social media network, in August. “We have begun a terrible war,” he writes, “a war in which cities are being destroyed and which is resulting in the deaths of children, women and the elderly.”

“ZOV” describes a chaotic Russian army in which demoralized recruits were outfitted with rusty weapons and ill-fitting uniforms. On February 24, the day the invasion began, Mr. Filatiev writes that he and other soldiers were shocked to learn they were invading Ukraine.

“I woke up around 2am,” he writes. “The column was somewhere in the wilderness, and everyone had turned off their engines and headlights,” he continues. “I couldn’t understand: are we shooting at advancing Ukrainians? Or maybe at NATO? Or do we attack? Who is this infernal shelling aimed at?”

He later characterizes the Russian army as lacking in basic services. During a military operation in occupied Kherson in March, he writes, desperate Russian soldiers searched buildings for food, water, showers and a place to sleep and looted everything they could find of value, including computers and clothing.

Mr Filatiev’s report was widely reported by independent Russian media, most of which were based outside the country. But state media have conspicuously ignored him. And even some Ukrainians on social media have resisted attempts to glorify or praise him for fighting in Ukraine.

Ivan Zhdanov, a Russian opposition figure and ally of jailed dissident Aleksei A. Navalny, said Mr Filatiev had blood on his hands.

“Honestly, I’m skeptical about his decision because he went there and fought there,” he said on his show on YouTube.

In an interview with the Agence France-Presse news agency, Mr Filatiev said he believes he has a moral imperative to say what is happening in Ukraine.

“I want people in Russia and in the world to know how this war came about,” he told the news agency.

Constant Méheut contributed the coverage from Paris.

And Bilefsky and

Categories
Politics

Russia-Ukraine tensions develop once more on the border

LONDON – A sharp rise in tensions between Russia and Ukraine in recent weeks raises fears of a revival of the military conflict.

Since Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine in 2014, there has been ongoing clashes between Ukrainian troops and pro-Russian separatists in Donbass, a region in eastern Ukraine. It is believed that around 14,000 people were killed in the fighting, interrupted by ceasefire periods (which both sides have accused of injuring the other).

Last week, Ukraine said four of its soldiers were killed in shelling by Russian forces in Donbass.

In early March, the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, Ruslan Khomchak, said that Russia’s “armed aggression” in Donbass posed a “great threat” not only to the national security of Ukraine, but to all NATO allies. Earlier this week, he said that Russian troops had been gathering near the border.

Russia’s actions in the US have not gone unnoticed On Wednesday, Foreign Minister Antony Blinken reiterated Washington’s support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity “in the face of ongoing Russian aggression,” the State Department said in a statement.

Speaking to the Ukrainian Foreign Minister, Blinken expressed “concerns about the security situation in eastern Ukraine and expressed condolences to the recent loss of four Ukrainian soldiers,” the statement added.

The Kremlin on Wednesday said it was concerned about mounting tensions in eastern Ukraine and feared that Kiev armed forces could do something to resume conflict.

“We are concerned about the growing tension and that the Ukrainian side could, in one way or another, take provocative measures that could lead to war. We really don’t want to see that,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said, according to Reuters.

“I mean a civil war that has already been going on,” said Peskov when asked to clear a conference call with reporters.

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday spoke to German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President Emmanuel Macron, who have tried to broker a peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, about “serious concerns about the escalation of armed confrontation on the Ukraine-provoked contact line “. and, according to Russia, Ukraine’s “refusal” to honor agreements that were part of the last ceasefire coordinated in July.

Timothy Ash, chief emerging markets strategist at BlueBay Asset Management, commented on Wednesday: “It seems like Putin is trying to test and investigate the West’s defenses and decide to confront him – maybe this is the prelude to one new military offensive in Ukraine. “

“It feels like Putin is preparing for a big step – perhaps a distraction to his own problems at home with Navalny and focusing on … State Duma elections. A victory in Ukraine would benefit the nationalist crowd in Russia and Russia throw some red meat again. ” expose the weakness of the West, “he added, referring to the imprisoned Russian dissident Alexei Navalny.

Ash advised Russian observers to keep an eye on the water shortage in the Crimea. The roots were laid seven years ago when Ukraine blocked the North Crimean Canal, cutting off most of the region’s freshwater supplies.

“If I were to look somewhere south and to the water problems in Crimea. The risk is that Russia will try diversionary tactics in Donbass if the bigger price is a military advance into Ukraine to conquer watercourses that water Crimea supply.” Said Ash.

“Perhaps Putin believes the West is weak and divided and unable to react,” continued Ash, citing inadequate sanctions by the Joe Biden administration, for example on the North Stream gas pipeline, because of the SolarWinds hack that was launched against US Failed government networks, and the 2016 election meddling “as a signal that the US is only petrified to act for fear of what Russia might do.”