Categories
Business

WHO classifies triple-mutant Covid variant from India as world well being danger

World Health Organization (WHO) Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus will attend a press conference at WHO headquarters on July 3, 2020, organized by the United Nations’ Association of Geneva Correspondents (ACANU) in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak caused by the novel coronavirus was organized in Geneva.

Fabrice Coffrini | AFP | Getty Images

A World Health Organization official said Monday that the highly contagious triple mutant variant of Covid widespread in India is being classified as a “worrying variant,” suggesting it has become a global health threat.

Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO technical lead for Covid-19, said the agency would provide more details in its weekly status report on pandemic Tuesday, but added that the variant known as B.1.617 was found in preliminary studies to do more Spread more easily than the original virus and there is some evidence that it can evade vaccines.

“And as such, we classify this as a variant of the concern on a global scale,” she said during a press conference. “Although some preliminary studies show increased transferability, we need a lot more information about this virus variant in that line in all sublines. Therefore, we need to do more sequencing and targeted sequencing.”

A Covon-19 coronavirus patient rests in a banquet room temporarily converted into a Covid care center in New Delhi on May 10, 2021.

Arun Sankar | AFP | Getty Images

The WHO announced last week that it is closely tracking at least 10 coronavirus variants worldwide, including the B.1.617. The variant was previously called the “variant of interest” because more study was needed to fully understand its meaning, Van Kerkhove said.

“For everyone in the home, this means that any circulating SARS-CoV-2 virus can infect and spread you, and anything to do with that is worrying,” she said on Monday. “So, all of us at home, no matter where we live, no matter what virus is circulating, we need to make sure we take all necessary measures to keep us from getting sick.”

A variant can be classified as “worrying” according to the WHO if it is found to be more contagious, more deadly and more resistant to current vaccines and treatments.

The international organization has already identified three other variants with the classification: B.1.1.7, which was first discovered in Great Britain and is currently the most widespread variant in the USA; B. 1.351, detected for the first time in South Africa, and the P.1 variant, detected for the first time in Brazil.

B.1.617 has three sub-lines, said Van Kerkhove, which are described in Tuesday’s management report.

Some believe the variant is behind the recent wave of infections in India.

The country averages 3,879 Covid deaths per day, according to data from Johns Hopkins University, although media reports suggest the official number is underestimated. Over the past seven days, an average of 391,000 new cases per day have been reported – an increase of about 4% from a week, data from Johns Hopkins University shows.

The variant has since expanded to other countries, including the United States.

– CNBC’s Rich Mendez contributed to this report.

Categories
Politics

Federal Help to Renters Strikes Slowly, Leaving Many at Danger

WASHINGTON – Vier Monate, nachdem der Kongress zig Milliarden Dollar an Notmiethilfe bewilligt hatte, hat nur ein kleiner Teil Vermieter und Mieter erreicht, und an vielen Orten ist es unmöglich, überhaupt einen Antrag zu stellen.

Das Programm erfordert, dass Hunderte von staatlichen und lokalen Regierungen ihre eigenen Pläne ausarbeiten und umsetzen, und einige haben nur langsam begonnen. Das Tempo wird jedoch hauptsächlich durch die Komplexität der Aufgabe behindert: Das Starten eines riesigen Popup-Programms, das Millionen von Mietern erreicht, ihre Schulden überprüft und Vermieter gewinnt, deren Interessen nicht immer mit denen ihrer Mieter übereinstimmen.

Das Geld, um das es geht, ist riesig. Der Kongress genehmigte im Dezember 25 Milliarden US-Dollar und fügte im März mehr als 20 Milliarden US-Dollar hinzu. Die Summe, die die Bundesregierung jetzt für die Nothilfe in Höhe von 46,5 Milliarden US-Dollar zur Verfügung hat, entspricht dem Jahresbudget des Ministeriums für Wohnungsbau und Stadtentwicklung.

Experten sagen, dass eine sorgfältige Vorbereitung die Ergebnisse verbessern kann; Es braucht Zeit, um die bedürftigsten Mieter zu finden und die Zahlungsgenauigkeit sicherzustellen. Da jedoch jeder siebte Mieter angibt, dass er mit den Zahlungen im Rückstand ist, erleiden die Vermieter destabilisierende Verluste, je länger die Verteilung des Geldes dauert, und die Mieter riskieren die Räumung.

Millionen von Mietern sind nur durch ein dürftiges Bundesmoratorium vor Räumung geschützt, das mehreren gerichtlichen Herausforderungen gegenübersteht, viele Haushalte auslässt und voraussichtlich im Juni ausläuft.

“Ich bin beeindruckt von der Menge an Arbeit, die unbesungene Beamte leisten, um diese Programme einzurichten, aber es ist problematisch, dass nicht mehr Geld aus der Tür kommt”, sagte Ingrid Gould Ellen, Professorin an der New York University studiert die Anstrengung. “Es gibt nachgelagerte Effekte, wenn kleine Vermieter ihre Gebäude nicht aufrechterhalten können, und Sie möchten Familien erreichen, wenn sie zum ersten Mal in eine Krise geraten, damit sich ihre Probleme nicht verschärfen.”

Die Schätzungen der unbezahlten Mieten variieren stark zwischen 8 und 53 Milliarden US-Dollar, wobei die vom Kongress genehmigten Beträge am oberen Ende des Bereichs liegen.

Die Situation zeigt den Patchwork-Charakter des amerikanischen Sicherheitsnetzes. Lebensmittel, Bargeld, Gesundheitsversorgung und andere Arten von Hilfe fließen durch separate Programme. Jedes hat seine eigene Mischung aus Bundes-, Landes- und lokaler Kontrolle, was zu großen geografischen Unterschieden führt.

Während einige Pandemiehilfen durch etablierte Programme geflossen sind, ist die Miethilfe sowohl dezentral als auch neu, was die Abweichung besonders ausgeprägt macht.

Unter den Hilfesuchenden befindet sich Saundra Broughton, 48, eine Logistikarbeiterin außerhalb von Charleston, SC, die sich im Herbst als sichere Mittelklasse betrachtete, als sie eine Wohnung mit Fitnesscenter und Salzwasserpool mietete. Zu ihrem Schock wurde sie bald entlassen; Nachdem sich ihre Arbeitslosenunterstützung verzögert hatte, erhielt sie einen Räumungsbescheid.

“Ich habe immer gearbeitet und auf mich selbst aufgepasst”, sagte sie. “Ich war noch nie in öffentlicher Unterstützung.”

Ein Richter gab Frau Broughton 10 Tage Zeit, um ihre Wohnung zu verlassen. Nur ein Anruf in letzter Minute zur Prozesskostenhilfe brachte die Nachricht vom Bundesmoratorium, wonach sich die Mieter bewerben müssen. Sie eilte in die Bibliothek, um das Formular innerhalb von 24 Stunden auszudrucken. “Aber ich schulde immer noch das Geld”, sagte sie, ungefähr 4.600 Dollar und zählte.

Wenn Frau Broughton im nahe gelegenen Berkeley County gelebt hätte, hätte sie bereits am 29. März Hilfe suchen können. Im ein paar Meilen entfernten Charleston County hätte sie sich am 12. April bewerben können. Als Einwohnerin des Dorchester County muss sie sich jedoch durch bewerben Der Staat, der 272 Millionen US-Dollar an Bundesgeldern hat, aber noch keine Anträge entgegennimmt.

“Warum halten sie das Geld?” Sie sagte. „Ich habe Tausende von Dollar Schulden und könnte jederzeit rausgeschmissen werden. Es ist ein sehr beängstigendes Gefühl. “

Die enormen Hilfsmaßnahmen, die zu Beginn der Pandemie ergriffen wurden, enthielten keine spezifischen Bestimmungen zur Unterstützung der Mieter, obwohl sie den meisten Haushalten Bargeld gaben. Aber Hunderte von staatlichen und lokalen Regierungen haben Programme mit diskretionärem Geld aus dem CARES-Gesetz gestartet, das im März 2020 verabschiedet wurde. Diese Bemühungen zahlten 4,5 Milliarden US-Dollar aus, was einem Übungslauf für die derzeit laufenden Bemühungen mit dem Zehnfachen des Geldes entsprach.

Zu den genannten Lektionen gehört die Notwendigkeit, die ärmsten Mieter zu erreichen, um ihnen mitzuteilen, dass Hilfe verfügbar ist. Technologie war oft ein Hindernis: Mieter mussten sich online bewerben, und vielen fehlten Computer oder Internetzugang.

Die Forderung nach Unterlagen verhinderte auch die Hilfe, da viele Personen ohne Nachweis von Mietverträgen oder Einkommensverlusten die Anträge nicht abschließen konnten. Einige Vermieter lehnten eine Teilnahme ab und zogen es möglicherweise vor, neue Mieter zu suchen.

Trotz des steigenden Bedarfs gaben Programme in Florida und New York, die durch den CARES Act finanziert wurden, zig Millionen nicht ausgegebener Dollar an die Staaten zurück. Als der Kongress im Dezember das neue Programm verabschiedete, gab fast jeder fünfte Mieterhaushalt an, mit den Zahlungen im Rückstand zu sein.

Die nationalen Bemühungen, das Emergency Rental Assistance Program, werden von der Finanzabteilung durchgeführt. Es verteilt Geld an Staaten sowie an Städte und Landkreise mit mindestens 200.000 Einwohnern, die ihre eigenen Programme durchführen möchten. Etwa 110 Städte und 227 Landkreise haben sich dafür entschieden.

Das Programm bietet Mietern mit niedrigem Einkommen, die durch die Pandemie wirtschaftlich geschädigt wurden, bis zu 12 Monate Miete und Nebenkosten, wobei Haushalte mit weniger als der Hälfte des Durchschnittseinkommens der Region Vorrang haben – in der Regel etwa 34.000 USD pro Jahr. Das Bundesgesetz verweigert die Hilfe für Einwanderer ohne Papiere nicht, obwohl dies in einigen Bundesstaaten und Landkreisen der Fall ist.

Moderne Hilfe scheint eine Mischung aus Jacob Riis und Bill Gates zu erfordern – Kontakt zu den Ausgegrenzten und Hilfe bei der Software. Die Fortschritte verlangsamten sich einen Monat lang, als die Biden-Regierung die unter Präsident Donald J. Trump herausgegebenen Leitlinien annullierte und Regeln entwickelte, die weniger Dokumentation erfordern.

Andere Gründe für langsame Starts variieren. Progressive Gesetzgeber in New York diskutierten monatelang darüber, wie die bedürftigsten Mieter am besten geschützt werden können. Die konservativen Gesetzgeber in South Carolina konzentrierten sich weniger auf das Thema. Das Ergebnis war jedoch weitgehend dasselbe: Keiner der Gesetzgeber hat sein Programm bis April verabschiedet, und keiner der Staaten nimmt noch Anträge an.

“Ich weiß nur nicht, warum es nicht dringender war”, sagte Sue Berkowitz, die Direktorin des South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center. “Wir haben ununterbrochen von Leuten gehört, die sich Sorgen um die Räumung machen.”

Es gibt keine vollständigen Daten darüber, wie vielen Mietern geholfen wurde. Aber von den 17,6 Milliarden US-Dollar, die an die Regierungen der Bundesstaaten vergeben werden, gehen 20 Prozent an Bundesstaaten, die noch keine Anträge stellen, obwohl einige lokale Programme in diesen Bundesstaaten dies tun. Florida (mit 871 Millionen US-Dollar), Illinois (566 Millionen US-Dollar) und North Carolina (547 Millionen US-Dollar) gehören zu denen, die noch nicht begonnen haben.

“Das Tempo ist langsam”, sagte Greg Brown von der National Apartment Association, der betonte, dass die Vermieter Hypotheken, Steuern und Unterhalt zu zahlen haben.

In einem kürzlich in der Brookings Institution gehaltenen Vortrag lobte Erika Poethig, eine Immobilienexpertin im Innenpolitischen Rat des Weißen Hauses, die „beispiellose Menge an Mietunterstützung“ und sagte, „die Bundesregierung hat nur so viel Fähigkeit“, schnellere Maßnahmen zu fördern.

Das Akzeptieren von Bewerbungen ist nur der Anfang. Mit 1,5 Milliarden US-Dollar hat Kalifornien 150.000 Anfragen nach Hilfe angezogen. Von den beantragten 355 Millionen US-Dollar wurden jedoch nur 20 Millionen US-Dollar genehmigt und 1 Million US-Dollar ausgezahlt.

Texas, mit 1,3 Milliarden US-Dollar, begann schnell, aber das Unternehmen, das es mit der Ausführung des Programms beauftragte, hatte Softwarefehler und Personalmangel. Ein Ausschuss im Repräsentantenhaus stellte fest, dass das Programm nach 45 Tagen nur 250 Haushalte bezahlt hatte.

Im Gegensatz dazu hatte ein Programm, das von der Stadt Houston und Harris County gemeinsam durchgeführt wurde, etwa ein Viertel seines Geldes ausgegeben und fast 10.000 Haushalte unterstützt.

Nicht jeder ist von dem Tempo betroffen. “Das Geld schnell rauszuholen ist hier nicht unbedingt das Ziel, insbesondere wenn wir uns darauf konzentrieren, sicherzustellen, dass das Geld die am stärksten gefährdeten Menschen erreicht”, sagte Diane Yentel, die Direktorin der National Low Income Housing Coalition.

Angesichts der Herausforderung sagte sie: “Ich denke, es geht in Ordnung.”

Sie weist auf ein Programm in Santa Clara County, Kalifornien, hin, das letztes Jahr für seine Reichweite gelobt wurde. Viele der Leute, denen es diente, sprachen wenig Englisch oder es fehlten formelle Mietverträge, um sie einzureichen. Jetzt, da 36 Millionen US-Dollar im Rahmen des neuen Programms ausgegeben werden sollten, entschied man sich für wochenlange zusätzliche Planungen, um 50 gemeinnützige Gruppen auszubilden, um die ärmsten Haushalte zu finden

“Geld zu verschenken ist eigentlich ziemlich schwierig”, sagte Jen Loving, die Destination: Home leitet, eine Wohnungsgruppe, die die Kampagne leitet. “Das ganze Geld der Welt spielt keine Rolle, wenn es nicht an die Menschen geht, die es brauchen.”

In Charleston, SC, wurde der Wohnungsbau zu einem Problem, nachdem eine Studie aus dem Jahr 2018 ergab, dass das Gebiet die höchste Räumungsrate des Landes aufweist. Charleston County führte drei Runden Mietentlastung mit CARES Act-Geldern durch, und der Staat führte zwei Runden durch.

Das zweite staatliche Programm, das im Februar mit 25 Millionen US-Dollar begann, zog so viele Anträge an, dass es innerhalb von sechs Tagen abgeschlossen wurde. Aber South Carolina bearbeitet diese Anfragen immer noch, während es entscheidet, wie die neuen Bundesmittel verteilt werden sollen.

Antonette Worke gehört zu den Bewerbern, die auf eine Antwort warten. Sie zog letztes Jahr von Denver nach Charleston, angezogen von günstigeren Mieten, wärmerem Wetter und einem Jobangebot. Aber der Job scheiterte und ihr Vermieter beantragte die Räumung.

Frau Worke, die an Nieren- und Lebererkrankungen leidet, ist vorübergehend durch das föderale Räumungsmoratorium geschützt. Es gilt jedoch nicht für Mieter, deren Mietverträge ablaufen, wie dies Ende nächsten Monats der Fall sein wird. Ihr Vermieter sagte, er würde sie zum Umzug zwingen, selbst wenn der Staat die überfälligen 5.000 Dollar Miete zahlen würde.

Trotzdem sagte sie, die Hilfe sei wichtig: Eine saubere Tafel würde es einfacher machen, eine neue Wohnung zu mieten und sie von einer unmöglichen Schuld zu befreien. “Ich bin so gestresst, dass ich mich krank gemacht habe”, sagte sie.

Charleston County bewegte sich schneller als der Staat und startete vor zwei Wochen sein 12-Millionen-Dollar-Programm. Die Arbeiter haben Computer zu Bauernmarkierungen, Gemeindezentren und einem Parkplatz in einem Einkaufszentrum gebracht. Christine DuRant, eine stellvertretende Bezirksverwalterin, sagte, die Hilfe sei notwendig, um Zwangsvollstreckungen zu verhindern, die den Wohnungsbestand verringern könnten. Kritiker würden sich jedoch stürzen, wenn das Programm Zahlungen an Personen senden würde, die sich nicht qualifizieren. Sie sagte: „Wir werden geprüft“, möglicherweise dreimal.

Latoya Green ist dort gefangen, wo der Wunsch nach Geschwindigkeit und Buchhaltung aufeinander treffen. Als Angestellte, die durch die Pandemie Stunden verloren hat, schuldet sie 3.700 US-Dollar an Miete und Nebenkosten und ist nur bis zum Ablauf ihres Mietvertrags im nächsten Monat durch das Räumungsmoratorium geschützt.

Sie beantragte an dem Tag, an dem das County-Programm begann, Hilfe, hat den Antrag jedoch noch nicht ausgefüllt. Sie sagte, sie sei verunsichert über die E-Mails, in denen sie um ihren Mietvertrag gebeten werde, der ihr fehlt, und über den Nachweis von Einkommensverlusten.

Dennoch kritisiert Frau Green keine Beamten des Charleston County. “Ich denke, sie versuchen ihr Bestes”, sagte sie. “Viele Leute machen Betrug.”

Mit der Zeit fügte sie hinzu: „Ich hoffe nur und bete zu Gott, dass sie mir helfen können.“

Categories
Health

A C.D.C. panel discusses new uncommon clot circumstances in J. & J. shot recipients and the way total threat appears to be very low.

Twelve of the 15 women in the confirmed cases developed blood clots in the brain. Many had blood clots elsewhere as well. Initial symptoms, which include a headache, usually begin six or more days after vaccination, said Dr. Shimabukuro. As the disorder develops, it can cause increased headaches, nausea and vomiting, abdominal pain, weakness in one side of the body, difficulty speaking, loss of consciousness, and seizures.

Dr. Shimabukuro found that seven of the women were obese, two had hypothyroidism, two had high blood pressure, and two were using oral contraceptives. It is not yet clear whether any of these factors could increase the risk of developing a coagulation disorder after vaccination.

Patients’ symptoms closely resemble a rare syndrome that can be caused by heparin, a widely used blood thinner, said Dr. Michael Streiff, a hematologist at Johns Hopkins University, joined the panel. Heparin, which could typically be used to treat blood clots, shouldn’t be used to treat these patients, he said.

Doctors should consider the rare coagulation disorder in patients who have blood clots and low platelet counts within three weeks of receiving the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, said Dr. Streiff.

“Knowing that this syndrome exists will help improve outcomes,” he said.

The committee could recommend Johnson & Johnson put up a formal warning label about the side effects, as the company has done in the European Union. About 10 million doses or more of the vaccine, which is manufactured at the company’s facility in the Netherlands, are on shelves in the United States and could be used immediately.

The meeting comes as the federal government is also investigating issues at a Baltimore factory that is slated to meet the country’s demand. Emergent BioSolutions, the operator of the facility, has manufactured tens of millions of doses of Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine, but they cannot be distributed until regulatory agencies certify the facility.

After Emergent had to discard up to 15 million potentially contaminated doses of the vaccine last month, federal regulators conducted an inspection that found a number of problems, including the risk of other lots being contaminated.

Categories
Health

No Being pregnant Danger Discovered From 2 Covid-19 Vaccines, Preliminary Analysis Exhibits

In an early analysis of coronavirus vaccine safety data, researchers from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found no evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna vaccines posed a serious risk during pregnancy.

The results are preliminary and only cover the first 11 weeks of the US vaccination program. The study, which included self-reported data on more than 35,000 people who received any of the vaccines during or shortly before pregnancy, is the largest to date on the safety of coronavirus vaccines in pregnant women.

Pregnant women were excluded during clinical trials with the vaccines. Patients, doctors and experts were therefore unsure whether the shots could be safely administered during pregnancy.

“There is great concern about whether it is safe and whether it would work and what to expect in terms of side effects,” said Dr. Stephanie Gaw, a Maternal-Fetal Medicine Specialist at the University of California at San Francisco.

The new data, said Dr. Gaw, show that “many pregnant people receive the vaccine, there is no significant increase in adverse pregnancy effects at this point and that the side effect profiles are not very similar to pregnant people.”

“I think this is all very comforting,” she said, “and I think it will really help public health providers and officials recommend the vaccine more strongly during pregnancy.”

Covid-19 carries serious risks during pregnancy. Pregnant women who develop symptoms of the disease are more likely to become seriously ill and die more often than non-pregnant women with symptoms.

Because of these risks, the CDC has recommended providing coronavirus vaccines to pregnant women, but also suggests that they consult their doctor when deciding whether to vaccinate.

The new study, published Wednesday in the New England Journal of Medicine, is largely based on self-reported data from V-safe, the CDC’s coronavirus vaccine safety monitoring system. Participants in the program use a smartphone app to regularly conduct surveys about their health and possible side effects after receiving a Covid-19 vaccine.

The researchers analyzed the side effects of V-Safe participants who received either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine between December 14, 2020 and February 28, 2021. They focused on 35,691 participants who said they were pregnant when they received the vaccine or became pregnant shortly afterwards.

After vaccination, pregnant participants reported the same general pattern of side effects as non-pregnant women, the researchers noted: injection site pain, fatigue, headache, and muscle pain.

What You Need To Know About The Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Break In The United States

    • On April 13, 2021, U.S. health officials called for an immediate halt to use of Johnson & Johnson’s single-dose Covid-19 vaccine after six recipients in the U.S. developed a rare blood clot disorder within one to three weeks of being vaccinated.
    • All 50 states, Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico have temporarily stopped using the vaccine or recommended providers are suspending use of the vaccine. The U.S. military, government-run vaccination centers, and a variety of private companies, including CVS, Walgreens, Rite Aid, Walmart, and Publix, also paused the injections.
    • Fewer than one in a million Johnson & Johnson vaccinations are currently being studied. If there is indeed a risk of blood clots from the vaccine – which has yet to be determined – the risk is extremely small. The risk of contracting Covid-19 in the United States is much higher.
    • The hiatus could complicate the country’s vaccination efforts at a time when many states are facing spikes in new cases and are trying to address vaccine hesitation.
    • Johnson & Johnson had also decided to delay the launch of its vaccine in Europe amid concerns about rare blood clots. However, the company later decided to continue its campaign after the European Union Medicines Agency announced the addition of a warning. South Africa, devastated by a contagious variant of the virus, stopped using the vaccine and Australia announced it would not buy doses.

Pregnant women were slightly more likely to report injection site pain than women who did not, but were less likely to report the other side effects. They were also slightly more likely to report nausea or vomiting after the second dose.

Pregnant V-safe participants also had the option of enrolling in a special register that recorded pregnancy and infant results.

By the end of February, 827 of the people on the pregnancy register had completed their pregnancies, of which 86 percent resulted in a live birth. The incidence of miscarriages, premature births, low birth weight, and birth defects were consistent with those reported in pregnant women prior to the pandemic, the researchers report.

“This study is critical for pregnant people,” said Dr. Michal Elovitz, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist at the University of Pennsylvania, in an email. “It’s very comforting that no acute events have been reported in pregnant people,” she said as the study progressed.

However, the report has several caveats, and experts say a lot more research is needed. Participation in the monitoring programs is voluntary and the data is reported by yourself.

Since the study period only spanned the first few months of the US vaccination campaign, the vast majority of those on the pregnancy registry were healthcare workers. And there is still no data on pregnancy outcomes for people vaccinated in the first trimester of pregnancy.

“I think we can feel more secure if we recommend the vaccine during pregnancy, especially in pregnant people who are at risk of Covid,” said Dr. Gaw. “But we do I will have to wait for more data to get full pregnancy results from early pregnancy vaccines. “

Categories
Health

Empty Center Seats on Planes Reduce Coronavirus Danger in Examine

Leaving the center seats vacant during a flight could reduce passenger exposure to coronavirus in the air by 23 to 57 percent. This is what researchers reported in a new study that modeled how aerosolized virus particles spread in a simulated aircraft cabin.

“Next is always better in terms of exposure,” said Byron Jones, a mechanical engineer at Kansas Sate University and co-author of the study. “It’s true in airplanes, it’s true in cinemas, it’s true in restaurants, it’s true everywhere.”

However, the study may have overestimated the benefits of having empty center seats by ignoring the wearing of masks by passengers.

“It’s important for us to know how aerosols spread in airplanes,” said Joseph Allen, a ventilation expert at Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health who was not involved in the study. But he added, “I am surprised that this analysis is now being published and it makes a big statement that the center seats should be left open as a risk mitigation approach if the model does not take into account the effects of masking. We know that masking is the most effective measure to reduce emissions from inhalation aerosols. “

Although scientists have documented several cases of coronavirus transmission on airplanes, airplane cabins are generally low risk environments as they tend to have excellent ventilation and filtration.

Still, concerns about the risk of air travel have swirled since the pandemic began. Planes are tight environments, and full flights make social distancing impossible. As a precaution, some airlines have started keeping the center seats free.

The new paper, published Wednesday in the Weekly Report on Morbidity and Mortality, is based on data collected at Kansas State University in 2017. In this study, the researchers sprayed a harmless aerosol virus through two mock aircraft cabins. (One was a five-row section of an actual single-aisle aircraft, the other a model of a wide-bodied double-aisle aircraft.) The researchers then monitored how the virus spread in each cabin.

For the new study, researchers from the state of Kansas and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention used the 2017 data to model how passenger exposure to a virus in the air would change if each middle seat was in one 20-row entrance cabin would remain open.

Depending on the specific modeling approach and the parameters used, keeping the middle seats empty reduced the overall load on the passengers in the simulation by 23 to 57 percent compared to a fully occupied flight.

“Some airlines have been working with a vacant seat policy and this study supports the effectiveness of this intervention in conjunction with other existing measures,” a CDC spokesman said in a statement emailed.

This reduction in risk resulted from increasing the distance between an infectious passenger and others, as well as reducing the total number of people in the cabin, reducing the likelihood that an infectious passenger would be on board at all.

The laboratory experiments on the spread of viruses in aircraft cabins were conducted several years before the current pandemic began and did not take into account any protection that wearing masks could provide.

Masking would reduce the amount of virus infectious passengers release into cabin air and would likely reduce the relative benefit of keeping the center seats open, said Dr. All.

Dr. Jones agreed. “In general, I would think that wearing a mask would make this effect a lot less pronounced,” he said. He also noted that mere exposure to the virus does not mean that anyone will be infected by it.

“To what extent a reduction in exposure could reduce the risk of transmission is not yet known,” said the CDC spokesman.

The cost-benefit analysis is difficult for airlines. However, from a purely health perspective, keeping the center seats open would be helpful to create a buffer between an infectious person and others nearby, according to Alex Huffman, an aerosol scientist at the University of Denver who was not involved in the study . “Removal is important, both for aerosols and for droplets,” he said.

Categories
Health

Sleeping Too Little in Center-Age Might Increase Dementia Threat, Examine Finds

The correlation was also whether or not people were taking sleeping pills and whether or not they had a mutation called ApoE4, which increases the likelihood of people developing Alzheimer’s disease, said Dr. Sabia.

The researchers did not find a general difference between men and women.

“The study found a modest, but I would say, somewhat important link between short sleep and risk of dementia,” said Pamela Lutsey, an adjunct professor of epidemiology and community health at the University of Minnesota who was not involved in the research. “Short sleep is very common and can therefore be important on a societal level, even if it is only marginally linked to the risk of dementia. Short sleep is something that we are in control of and that you can change. “

As with other research in the field, however, the study had limitations that prevent it from being proven that inadequate sleep can lead to dementia. Most of the sleep data was self-reported, a subjective measurement that isn’t always accurate, experts said.

At one point, nearly 4,000 participants had sleep duration measured with accelerometers, and that data was consistent with their self-reported sleep times, the researchers said. However, this quantitative measurement came late in the study, when participants were around 69 years old, which made it less useful than if it had been obtained at a younger age.

In addition, most of the participants were white and better educated and healthier than the entire UK population. And when researchers rely on electronic health records to diagnose dementia, they may have missed some cases. They also couldn’t identify the exact types of dementia.

“It is always difficult to know what to draw from such studies,” wrote Robert Howard, professor of geriatric psychiatry at University College London, one of several experts who gave Nature Communications comments on the study. “Insomnia – which probably doesn’t need anything else to think about in bed,” he added, “shouldn’t worry about heading for dementia unless you fall asleep right away.”

There are compelling scientific theories about why not getting enough sleep could worsen your risk of dementia, especially Alzheimer’s. Studies have shown that cerebrospinal fluid amyloid, a protein that clumps up in plaques in Alzheimer’s disease, “increases when you are sleep deprived,” said Dr. Music. Other studies on amyloid and another Alzheimer’s protein, tau, suggest that “sleep is important in removing proteins from the brain or limiting production,” he said.

Categories
Health

J&J Vaccine and Blood Clots: A Danger, if It Exists, Is Tiny

On Tuesday morning, U.S. health officials recommended a break in using Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine while examining six reports of blood clots in women ages 18 to 48. One has died, another is in critical condition in the hospital.

As of Monday, 6.8 million people in the United States had received the vaccine with no other serious side effects reported.

Experts are yet to determine to what extent the vaccine may be responsible for the clots. However, the investigation follows action by European regulators who concluded that a vaccine made by AstraZeneca may also be the cause of a similar, extremely rare, coagulation disorder.

US and European public health experts have emphasized that for most people, the benefits of Covid vaccines far outweigh the risks.

Several countries in Europe last week restricted the use of the AstraZeneca-Oxford vaccine to older adults due to the rare occurrence of a blood disorder in younger people. The AstraZeneca vaccine was not approved in the United States.

Fewer than one in a million J&J vaccinations are currently being studied. If there is indeed a risk of blood clots from the vaccine – which has yet to be determined – the risk is extremely small. The risk of contracting Covid-19 in the United States is much higher.

The FDA recommends people who have received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine within the past three weeks to see their doctor if they have severe headache, abdominal pain, leg pain, or difficulty breathing. Doctors who see people with these symptoms, especially if the patients are young women, should ask if they have recently had a Covid shot, said Dr. Anthony Fauci, senior scientific advisor to the Biden administration, at a press conference Tuesday.

People shouldn’t worry about mild headaches and flu-like symptoms for the first few days after vaccination. These are common, harmless side effects caused by the immune system’s defense against the coronavirus.

For people who got the vaccine a month or two ago, the blood clot problem means “nothing,” said Dr. Fauci. The six cases occurred within a “fairly narrow window” of six to 13 days after people got the shot, he said.

During clinical trials and after the widespread use of vaccines, experts track all of the medical problems that arise in people who receive them. If an unusually large number of cases arise, regulators may decide to stop a study or stop using a vaccine for further investigation.

Breaks are frequent, and tests usually show that the medical problems were incidental. If the investigation reveals that a vaccine poses a risk, regulators can write new guidance on who should or should not receive it. The break also gives them time to advise doctors on how to recognize and treat the disease.

If so, the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend a break States have already followed the advice of the agencies. Companies that are temporarily discontinuing use of the vaccine include CVS Health and Walgreens.

In a press conference Tuesday, federal officials said the government review would likely only take a few days. A CDC panel is expected to discuss the issue at a meeting on Wednesday.

Six women in the United States who received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine developed a rare blood clot disorder within about two weeks of being vaccinated. In people with this condition called cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, clots form in veins that drain blood from the brain. The results are “stroke-like,” said Dr. Anne Schuchat from the CDC.

Researchers studying a very similar disorder in AstraZeneca recipients in Europe say it appears to be caused by an intense immune system response to the vaccine, which makes antibodies that activate platelets, a blood component that helps to form normal blood clots in the Contributes to wound repair. In addition to clots, abnormal bleeding occurs. European researchers have named the disorder identified there as “vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia”.

Dr. FDA’s Peter Marks said it was the unusual combination of clotting and bleeding that set a red flag for regulators as a possible safety signal.

So far, researchers have failed to find a way to predict who will develop the disorder and have not identified an underlying condition that could indicate a susceptibility.

Updated

April 13, 2021, 5:17 p.m. ET

Dr. Fauci said if scientists could identify a common core trait among the women who developed the blood clots, it could help identify who is at risk and allow regulators to pinpoint categories of people who are not receiving the J&J vaccine should.

A blood clot is a thickened, gelatinous clot of blood that can block blood flow. Clots form in response to injury and can also be caused by many diseases, including cancer and genetic disorders, certain medications, and prolonged sitting or bed rest. Covid itself can cause serious coagulation problems. Clots that form in the legs sometimes break off and travel to the lungs or, rarely, to the brain, where they can be fatal.

In the United States, 300,000 to 600,000 people each year develop blood clots in their lungs, leg veins, or other parts of the body, according to the CDC

Based on this data, approximately 1,000 to 2,000 blood clots occur daily in the US population. With millions of people being vaccinated every day now, some of these clots appear in those who just happened to receive the shots, regardless of the vaccine.

In the UK, about 1 in 1,000 people are affected by a blood clot in a vein each year, according to regulators.

However, the worrying coagulation disorder among vaccine recipients is much rarer and different from typical blood clots. In addition to clotting in the brain – cerebral venous sinus thrombosis for short, or CVST for short – all patients had remarkably low levels of platelets, which made them prone to abnormal bleeding.

On Tuesday, Johnson & Johnson announced that the company was aware of an extremely rare condition involving people with blood clots combined with low platelets in a small number of people who received the vaccine. “In addition, we have examined these cases with the European health authorities,” said the company in its statement. “We made the decision to proactively delay the launch of our vaccine in Europe.”

At the press conference on Tuesday, Dr. Marks from the FDA said the cases are “very, very similar.”

What You Need To Know About The Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Break In The United States

Both Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca use adenoviruses to transport DNA into human cells and begin the process of creating immunity to the coronavirus. It is not yet known if this technology is causing the problem.

German researchers have speculated that DNA from the vaccine could trigger the immune response in some people. However, the condition is so rare that researchers say patients likely also have an individual biological trait – which is still unknown – that predisposes them to the immune overreaction.

Last month, European regulators began investigating similar cases of cerebral vein thrombosis related to low platelets. They concluded that the disorder was a very rare side effect of the AstraZeneca vaccine. It’s too early to know if Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine is responsible for the same type of rare blood clot.

European regulators had recommended that recipients of the vaccine seek medical help for a number of possible symptoms, including leg swelling, persistent abdominal pain, severe and persistent headache or blurred vision, and tiny spots of blood under the skin outside of the area where the Injection was given was given.

However, these symptoms were so vague that the UK emergency departments almost immediately saw an increase in patients worried they were as they were described.

Still, German researchers say such symptoms need to be followed up in vaccine recipients. Blood tests can detect the antibodies.

Doctors in Germany and Norway have treated patients with blood-thinning drugs to stop the clot from growing and with intravenous immunoglobulin, which can help clear up the misdirected antibodies that are causing the problem.

The researchers there and the US federal health authorities advised against the use of a conventional blood thinner, heparin, on Tuesday and recommended that alternative drugs be chosen instead. The reason is that the disorder is very similar to a rare syndrome caused by heparin and it is possible that heparin could make the situation worse in these patients.

Heparin could “do a lot of damage,” said Dr. Marks.

German researchers have stressed that treatment should start as soon as possible as the condition can worsen quickly.

We do not know yet. The six cases studied in people who received the J&J vaccine all involved women. However, this number is so small that no clear conclusions can be drawn from it.

When asked on Tuesday whether the use of contraception could be a risk factor, US health officials said they knew no connection.

In Europe, it initially appeared that women were at a higher risk of blood clots associated with the AstraZeneca vaccine, although in some cases men who had received the vaccine were affected.

Upon closer inspection, it was found that in some countries more women overall received the vaccine because they were overrepresented among health workers. UK regulators now say they have no evidence as to whether men or women are more likely to be affected by blood clots.

The FDA did not find any similar cases in people who received the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines.

However, decreased platelet counts have been reported in a few patients who received the Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech and AstraZeneca vaccines. One recipient, a doctor in Florida, died of a cerebral haemorrhage when his platelet counts failed to restore, and others were hospitalized. US health officials have stated that the cases are being investigated, but they have not reported the results of those reviews and have yet to advise that they are linked to the vaccines.

Benjamin Mueller contributed to the reporting.

Categories
Business

As U.S. Prospects Brighten, Fed’s Powell Sees Danger in World Vaccination Tempo

Federal Reserve chairman Jerome H. Powell stressed Thursday that despite the better economic outlook in the US, vaccinating the world and tackling the coronavirus pandemic remain critical to the global outlook.

“Viruses don’t respect borders,” Powell said when speaking on a panel at the International Monetary Fund. “Until the world is really vaccinated, we are all at risk of new mutations and we will not be able to resume activities around the world with confidence.”

While some advanced economies, including the United States, are rapidly moving towards widespread vaccination, many emerging economies are lagging far behind: some have only given one dose per 1,000 people.

Mr. Powell joined a chorus of global politicians, stressing the importance of ensuring that all nations – not just the richest – are able to fully protect themselves against the coronavirus. Kristalina Georgieva, executive director of the International Monetary Fund, said policy makers need to continue to focus on public health as a key policy priority.

“This year, next year, vaccination policy is economic policy,” said Ms. Georgieva on the same panel as Mr. Powell. “It has an even higher priority than the traditional instruments of fiscal and monetary policy. Why? Without them, we cannot reverse the fate of the world economy. “

Still, she also warned against withdrawing monetary support prematurely, saying that clear communication from the United States was helpful and important. The Fed is arguably the world’s most critical central bank thanks to the dollar’s widespread use, and unexpected policy changes in the United States can disrupt global markets and make it difficult for less developed economies to recover.

“Withdrawal of support prematurely can shorten recovery,” she warned.

The Fed has kept interest rates close to zero since March 2020 and buys around $ 120 billion worth of government bonds every month. This policy is designed to boost spending by keeping borrowing cheap. Officials knew they would continue to support the economy until it gets closer to its goals of maximum employment and stable inflation – and that while the situation is improving, it is not there.

“There are a number of factors that come together to improve the outlook for the US economy,” Powell said, noting that tens of millions of Americans are now fully vaccinated so that the economy can soon be fully reopened. “However, the recovery here remains uneven and incomplete.”

Employers hired more than 900,000 workers last month, but the country is still lacking millions of jobs compared to February 2020, and new data shows that state unemployment claims have increased over the past week. Mr Powell noted that the burden is least on those who can least bear it: lower-income service workers, who are largely minority and women, are hard hit by the job losses.

When asked what keeps him up at night, Mr. Powell said “There’s a pretty big tent city” he passes by on his way home from work in Washington. “We have to keep reminding ourselves that there is a very large group of people who aren’t, even though some parts of the economy are just doing fine.”

Given the pandemic’s role in exacerbating inequality, both Mr Powell and Ms Georgieva said it was important to support workers and make sure they find their way into new and decent jobs.

The Fed chairman said the policy is too focused on short-term, palliative measures and not enough on longer-term solutions that will help expand economic opportunities.

“I think we really need, as a country, to invest – and I’m not talking about a specific bill – in things that increase the inclusiveness of the economy and the longer-term potential of the economy,” said Powell. “In particular, invest in people so that they can participate, contribute to, and benefit from the prosperity of our economy.”

These comments come from the Biden government’s push for an ambitious $ 2 trillion infrastructure package that includes provisions for labor market training, technological research and widespread broadband. The administration has proposed paying for the package by increasing corporate taxes.

“We have been advocating more investment in infrastructure for some time. This helps to increase productivity here in the US, ”said Ms. Georgieva, describing the provisions on climate-focused and“ social infrastructure ”as positive. She said they didn’t have a chance to fully evaluate the plan, but “by and large, yes, we support it.”

But the White House plan has already met opposition from Republicans and some moderate Democrats who are cautious about raising taxes or other large spending package after several large stimulus packages.

Some commentators have warned that in addition to expanding the country’s debt burden, the government’s virus spending – particularly the recent $ 1.9 trillion stimulus package – could overheat the economy. Fed officials were less concerned.

“There is a difference between a one-time price spike and persistent inflation,” Powell said Thursday. “The nature of a bottleneck is that it gets fixed.”

If price gains and inflation expectations rose “substantially”, the Fed would react.

“We don’t think that’s the most likely outcome,” he said.

Categories
Business

Totally Vaccinated Individuals Can Journey With Low Threat, C.D.C. Says

Americans fully vaccinated against Covid-19 can travel safely domestically and abroad as long as they take basic precautions like wearing masks, federal health officials announced on Friday, a long-awaited change from the government’s dire warnings who have kept many millions at home for the past year.

Announcing the change at a press conference at the White House, officials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention emphasized their preference for people not to travel. However, growing evidence of the effectiveness of vaccines given to more than 100 million Americans suggested that vaccinated people could do so “at little risk to themselves.”

The change in the official stance of the CDC comes at a moment of hope and danger in the pandemic. The pace of vaccination has accelerated rapidly across the country and the number of deaths has decreased.

However, in many states, cases are increasing significantly as new variants of the coronavirus spread across the country. Only last Monday, Dr. Rochelle P. Walensky, the CDC director, facing a possible fourth wave if states and cities continue to ease public health restrictions, telling reporters that she feels “impending doom”.

Some public health experts were surprised by the announcement on Friday and expressed concern that the government is sending confusing signals to the public.

“It’s a mixture of ‘please don’t travel’ and at the same time it makes it easier for a subset of people to travel,” said Dr. Wafaa El-Sadr, Professor of Epidemiology and Medicine at Columbia Mailman School of Public Health. “I think it’s very confusing and contradicts the message we heard earlier this week: ‘stay seated’, ‘wait’, ‘be patient’. And that worries me. Public health messaging has to be very clear, very consistent, and very simple. “

Dr. Walensky himself appeared to acknowledge the apparent mixed message during Friday’s press conference. Science shows us that full vaccination allows you to do more things safely, and it is important that we include this guide on rising cases as well, ”she said.

The travel industry welcomed the new guidelines in the hope that it could mark the beginning of a turnaround for airlines, hotels and destinations that have been suffering increasing losses for more than a year.

“When travel comes back, US jobs come back,” Roger Dow, executive director of the US Travel Association, an industry group, said in a statement.

Federal officials insisted that people who were not fully vaccinated should not travel at all, a position widely supported by public health experts.

Updated

April 1, 2021, 11:02 p.m. ET

“If you are fully vaccinated you can travel again. If not, there is still a lot of virus circulating and it is still a risky endeavor. You should defer until you are vaccinated or the situation improves,” said Caitlin Rivers, epidemiologist and assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

If unvaccinated people need to travel, the CDC recommends testing them for coronavirus infections one to three days before they travel and again three to five days after they travel. They should quarantine themselves for seven days if they are tested and ten days if they are not tested after a trip, the agency said.

People are considered fully vaccinated two weeks after receiving the single dose of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine or two weeks after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer BioNTech or Moderna shot. Around 58 million people in the US, 22 percent of the adult population, have been fully vaccinated, according to the latest figures from the CDC

Scientists are still not sure whether vaccinated people can even briefly get infected and spread the virus to others. A recent CDC study suggested that such cases might be rare, but until that issue is resolved, many public health officials feel it is unwise to tell vaccinated Americans to just do what they want. They say it is important that all people vaccinated continue to wear masks, practice social distancing, and take other precautions.

Under new CDC guidelines, fully vaccinated Americans traveling domestically are not required to be tested for the coronavirus or follow quarantine procedures at destination or upon their return. When traveling abroad, they only need to have a coronavirus test or quarantine if the country they are traveling to requires.

However, the guidelines state that they must have a negative coronavirus test before returning to the United States and that they should be retested three to five days after they return.

The recommendation is based on the idea that vaccinated people can still be infected with the virus. The CDC also noted the lack of vaccine supplies in other countries and concerns about the possible introduction and spread of new variants of the virus, which are more common overseas.

Most states have shortened their deadlines for opening vaccinations to all adults as the pace of vaccination has increased across the country. As of Friday, an average of nearly three million shots a day were being administered, according to the CDC

The new advice complements the CDC recommendations issued in early March that fully vaccinated individuals can gather in small groups in private settings without masks or social distancing and visit unvaccinated individuals from a single household as long as they are at low risk of developing serious illness if with infected by the virus.

Travel has already increased nationwide as the weather warms and Americans tire of pandemic restrictions. Last Sunday was the busiest day at domestic airports since the pandemic began. According to the Transportation Security Administration, nearly 1.6 million people passed security checks at American airports.

But industry concerns are far from over. The pandemic has also shown companies large and small that their employees can often work remotely as productively as in face-to-face meetings. As a result, the aviation and hospitality industries expect it will be years before lucrative business travel bounces back to pre-epidemic levels and leaves a gaping hole in revenue.

And while vacation travel in the US may be steadily recovering, airlines expect it to take until 2023 or 2024 for passenger traffic to hit 2019 levels, according to Airlines for America, an industry group. The industry lost more than $ 35 billion in the past year and continues to lose tens of millions of dollars every day, the group said.

Many countries, including those in the European Union, are still preventing most Americans from coming. Some are starting to make exceptions for those who are vaccinated. Starting March 26, Americans who can show proof of vaccination will be able to visit Iceland and avoid restrictions like testing and quarantine, according to the country’s government

The CDC also issued more detailed technical instructions for cruise lines on Thursday, urging them to take action to develop vaccination strategies and make plans for routine crew tests and daily reporting of Covid-19 cases before simulating test runs of You can travel with volunteers before accepting real passengers. The CDC guidelines recognize that cruises “always present some risk of spreading Covid-19”.

Some destinations and cruise lines already require travelers to be fully vaccinated. The Royal Caribbean cruise line requires passengers and crew 18+ to be vaccinated to board their ships, as do Virgin Voyages, Crystal Cruises, and others.

Currently, airlines do not require vaccinations to travel. But the idea has been talked about a lot in the industry.

Niraj Chokshi contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

‘Important’ Migrant Farmworkers Threat An infection and Deportation

Food and farm workers in California are more likely to die of Covid-19 than any other industry. But while other industries were closing, the agriculture business continued, relying on a largely undocumented workforce that the federal government identified as essential. “California’s Covid-19 vaccination effort has begun.” “Proponents of farm workers say their turn should be next for vaccines for national food security reasons.” As early as January, Riverside County began its first large-scale vaccination measures for farm workers. However, the challenges showed how marginalized this community has become. “Vaccinating Illegal Migrants About the American People.” “Put Americans first. Put Americans first. “Now the plight of these workers is driving Congress to implement important immigration reforms. At stake is a path to citizenship for approximately one million undocumented workers across the country. “Farm workers were on the front line. You deserve the opportunity to take steps toward legal status. “The promise of amnesty for those who are already here illegally encourages more foreigners to come illegally.” This is usually an inspection point on a grape and date farm. When Riverside County distributed their first vaccines to farm workers, they brought them here. “Today we vaccinate farm workers. We supply 250 vaccines. But it’s a very large community, about 20,000 to 30,000 farm workers. And to achieve herd immunity, we have to vaccinate at least 70 percent of our population. Known for Palm Springs and world-class golf courses, Riverside County is also home to the agricultural region of the Eastern Coachella Valley, where the Covid positivity rate hit nearly 40 percent in December. “We know that they are in close contact with other people. And so we know that the transmission possibilities are really great. But it was really amazing. My job is to keep our community healthy. If someone gets Covid-19, whether it is undocumented or not, they can pass it on to the community like any other person. “But while prioritizing farm workers on paper is one thing, actually getting shots in the arms is another. “Your access to resources is not there. Right, there isn’t a lot of public transport or doctors or clinics in the area. “In order to reach these workers, the county had to go to their employers. “Hey Brett, really, really good news for you. Friday, vaccinations for your employees. ” “No way!” Janell Percy is the executive director of the Coachella Valley Growers Association. Recently, she has been a de facto county health agency, coordinating vaccination clinics through her network of local farm owners. “This process was very challenging. There were so many strangers. You know, I’m used to working with plants more than people, I guess. So I got you for 25 right? “” Ah yes. “” You know, everyone is concerned. I’ve told everyone to just be patient. Could be weeks. It could be months. At this point I don’t know. “But not everyone is on Janells List. Smaller farms like this one may not pay into the association. Many workers track seasonal crops from farm to farm, and some use borrowed social security numbers with employers. These workers may not even be aware of the county’s mobile vaccination efforts. Hence, has The county also rely on community organizations to reach people more directly. Luz Gallegos leads one of these groups. She grew up here, herself the child of undocumented farm workers. “We have told the community that your health should always come first and prevention is key. And if you are not alive you will never see a green card. But we can Do not condemn the community for not trusting the government. “” Farm workers have always been important, but they were never treated as such. ” There are an estimated 800,000 farm workers in California alone. Nationwide, the number is between two and three million. “As we approach high season we will have to accelerate exponentially to vaccinate farm workers or we will see many more die of Covid-19.” Alberto and Marina have lived with a fear of ICE and arrest since they came here. It’s an experience Marina knows firsthand. She was caught crossing the border three years ago. “Basic workers shouldn’t have to worry about whether or not they will see their children at the end of the day, whether or not they will be deported.” Raul Ruiz grew up in these fields. He became a doctor, then ran for Congress and won. He is now in his home district teaching farm workers about the vaccine. For Dr. Getting the vaccine to farm workers is not enough for Ruiz. In March he helped bring the Farm Workers Modernization Act into the house. The law would provide protection and a path to legalization for undocumented farm workers. “They literally die from feeding you. We need to protect and secure our food supply chain. If there is a moment to instill empathy and understanding to protect them from separation from their families, it is now. “It will exacerbate the humanitarian crisis on the border.” “The road to citizenship as a reward for violating our laws.” The law was passed with the support of both parties, but there will be an uphill battle in the Senate. Meanwhile, other states are joining California and starting vaccinating farm workers. They realize that the only way out of the pandemic is for everyone to take turns.