Categories
Politics

Sen. Graham says he was stating the plain with Trump riots declare

US Senator Lindsey Graham speaks at a press conference at the US Capitol on August 05, 2022 in Washington, DC.

Kevin Dietsch | Getty Images

US Senator Lindsey Graham on Saturday defended allegations that there would be “riots in the streets” if former President Donald Trump was prosecuted for misusing classified information, and said he condemned the violence used during the Capitol riots was seen last year.

“I was trying to state the obvious,” Graham, a South Carolina Republican and close Trump ally, told CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick at the Ambrosetti Forum in Italy.

“Here’s what I said, The raid continues [former] The home of President Trump, the likely candidate for 2024, better bears fruit here,” he added.

“Our country, the people on our side believe that there are no rules in the justice system regarding Trump. [it’s a case of] ‘Get him any way you get him,’ so I said if it’s like Clinton and he’s prosecuted, it’s going to be one of the most disruptive events in America,” Graham said.

Trump and his allies have argued that the FBI, which is investigating Trump for possible violations of the law related to espionage and obstruction of justice, treats him differently than Hillary Clinton, who is the subject of an FBI investigation into her use of a private email server, but was not prosecuted. Trump’s critics argue that the two cases are not comparable.

Graham said he opposed the violence seen in the Jan. 6 Capitol riots, saying “all these people who desecrated the Capitol should go to jail,” but said that any perceived injustice against Trump would have consequences.

“I don’t want to apologize to the January 6 folks because that seems to reinforce the narrative that this is okay. I said something I really believe in – if he does what she did with classified information and he’s prosecuted and she didn’t do it, that would create a problem.”

Graham said last week there would be “riots in the streets” if Trump were prosecuted for misusing classified information.

“I will say this, if there is an indictment against Donald Trump for misappropriating classified information after the Clinton debacle … there will be riots in the streets,” said Graham Trey Gowdy, a former Fox News Republican congressman.

Trump ‘was a consistent president’

Trump is under investigation and at risk of being charged for his handling of classified White House records he brought to his home in Mar-a-Lago, Florida.

Last week, the release of a heavily redacted affidavit showed how concerns about illegal activity and obstruction of justice led to an FBI raid at Trump’s resort in July.

Graham acknowledged that he believes in “the responsible use of classified information” but reiterated that “mishandling of classified information is really bad, but we can’t have a system where one person is prosecuted and the other isn’t.” .

When asked if Trump is the best person to represent the Republican Party in 2024, Graham said, “I think he might be.”

“Whether you like Trump or not, he’s been a consistent president … I think a strong American president, unpredictable, is a good thing as long as you keep him within bounds. His problem is personal, his policies have stood the test of time, but has he exhausted the American people in terms of his personality? The time will tell. But I’m saying this, if there’s a political debate after the Biden presidency in 2024, I think his chances are good. If it’s a personality contest, he’s going to get in trouble.”

Graham said he talks to Trump “all the time” and the former president still thinks he’s been “cheated.” Graham said he voted to confirm the 2020 election and that Biden is the legitimate president.

Trump “really believes the system has been rigged against him, and I said, ‘Mr. President, I’m not trying to tell you to change your beliefs. I’m trying to tell you that you have no chance of winning in 2020 unless you have a pretty good chance of winning 2024 if you want to,'” Graham said, noting that he told Trump when he made a comeback celebrates, “it will be one of the greatest political comebacks in American history”.

Speech and Debate Clause

A federal judge on Thursday denied Graham’s recent attempt to challenge a subpoena for his testimony before a special Georgia grand jury investigating possible criminal interference by Trump and his allies in the 2020 election.

However, the judge limited the scope of the subpoena by ordering that Graham not be questioned about phone calls he made with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and his associates in the weeks following the November 2020 election between Trump and President Joe Biden Has.

It follows continued offers by Graham to avoid testifying on the grounds that his position as legislature grants him immunity under the US Constitution’s “speech or debate” clause.

Graham reiterated his position on Saturday, saying: “I did not start this debate. You have a prosecutor who has decided to investigate a national election and to call anyone and everyone connected to the role he played in the election United States Senator, in our Constitution we have a clause of immunity from speech or debates so we can’t be dragged into courts across the country every time we do something that someone doesn’t like.”

“I think the court will recognize that my activities as a United States Senator were covered by the speech and debate clause that the district attorney’s desire to bring me to Georgia exceeds the constitution.”

Categories
Business

After Capitol Riots, Billionaire’s ‘Students’ Confront Their Benefactor

Private equity billionaire Stephen A. Schwarzman has spent many years funding educational programs, from his old high school to the Ivy League.

But the Blackstone chairman’s great success didn’t always buy goodwill: there was swift opposition to his proposal to give his name to Abington Senior High School in Pennsylvania, and his close ties with former President Donald J. Trump added to the opposition against his will by name on a campus center he financed at Yale.

And now some of the participants in the Schwarzman Scholarship Program – a Masters course he set up at Tsinghua University in Beijing as a Chinese analogue of the Rhodes Scholarships – are speaking out against their benefactor.

They say that Mr Schwarzman is not living up to his own values ​​and is damaging the reputation of the program by not cutting money off lawmakers who opposed confirming President Biden’s election victory.

In a letter emailed to Mr. Schwarzman on February 10, 161 current and past Schwarzman scholars and two program professors urged Mr. Schwarzman to cut these politicians and groups off. “You stood up for integrity, honesty and courage,” they wrote. “Now we ask you to demonstrate these values ​​by refusing to financially support those who would overturn the results of a free and fair election to their own political advantage.”

About an hour later, Mr Schwarzman, who along with his wife was, according to an analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics, the third largest donor to the offending legislature, turned it down.

Although voting on the electoral certificate is “one of the main factors” in deciding who to support in the future, Schwarzman wrote, “I appreciate my constitutional right to carefully determine who to vote and support.”

The rift focuses on one of Mr. Schwarzman’s finest accomplishments. A one-year graduate program began with a donation of $ 100 million from him and was supplemented with $ 450 million raised from others. Up to 200 students attend each year and live and study in a building designed by Robert AM Stern Architects – Schwarzman College – with courses focused on Chinese history, leadership and global affairs.

However, some of the letter’s signatories have begun to wonder if having “Schwarzman Scholar” on their résumés is both a risk and an advantage.

“I feel like I cannot in good conscience allow my name to be associated with someone who refuses not to donate to such people,” said Alistair Kitchen, a program alumnus who helped organize the Assistance for the letter was helpful.

Mr. Kitchen, 29, an Australian who works in New York for Collective Impact, a strategy firm focused on progressive causes, said some scholars feel that their association with the program, even if it does, could harm them Browned inheritance from Mr. Schwarzman that Mr. The Kitchen called a shape a “Ruf wash”.

For Ashlie Koehn, who worked her way through the University of Kansas and joined the Kansas Air National Guard before becoming a Schwarzman Fellow, the program was a revelation – the first time she had been able to focus on academics, not costs . But she said Mr. Schwarzman didn’t seem to understand the extent of his influence.

“He has this sense of himself as the average American citizen that he is in some ways,” said Ms. Koehn, 30, who works in the state government. “But I think it ignores the fact that he has this oversized capital, and his donations make him oversized.”

A quarter of the more than 600 students who have participated in the program since 2016 have signed the letter, including 18 anonymously. Some scholars supported the letter, organizers said, but feared it would impact their professional lives if they signed.

Others had other reasons for the decline. Charles Vitry, a London-based alumnus of the program’s 2018 class, did not sign, despite saying he “respected and appreciated the principles” of those who did. He said he also saw the need for “wider common space to discuss challenging issues”.

A spokesperson for Mr. Schwarzman noted that the program had started in 2013, “well before the 2016 election,” and that Mr. Schwarzman had broadly supported Republicans in Congress in 2019, on the recommendation of GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy of California. “The majority of the candidates Steve donated to vote for the confirmation of the results – as Steve has repeatedly requested,” said spokesman Matt Anderson.

A Schwarzman Scholars program spokeswoman, Ellie Gottdenker, said in a statement that the program “remains true to its global mission and reputation as a world-class bridge for mutual understanding between China and the rest of the world.”

This is not the first time Mr Schwarzman has taken a foray into educational philanthropy and faced opposition from those who benefit. Nor is it the first time that the opposition has emerged from his political positions.

After Mr Schwarzman donated $ 150 million to Yale, his alma mater, in 2015 to build a building for events and informal gatherings called the Schwarzman Center, some professors and students complained about Blackstone’s business practices and its connections Mr. Trump.

In 2018, he pledged $ 350 million to build a new computer science center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which was also named after him and aroused opposition for similar reasons.

That same year, he pledged $ 25 million to upgrade the high school he attended in suburban Philadelphia and agreed to add his name to his own. The proposal sparked an immediate backlash, and Mr Schwarzman and the school quickly switched courses, just to name a new science and technology building after him.

The friction with the Schwarzman Scholars began almost immediately after the program welcomed its first grade in 2016.

Shortly after the election, Mr. Schwarzman agreed to head a corporate advisory board that made him one of Mr. Trump’s most prominent employees. After Mr Trump introduced a travel and immigration ban for people from predominantly Muslim countries, Mr Schwarzman received sharp questions from scholars on a video chat, according to one participant. He argued that it was important to take a broad perspective and focus on similarities rather than differences, the person recalled.

Then came the 2020 election, and Mr Schwarzman’s reaction to the outcome felt ambiguous to some program members.

Calling executives while votes were still being counted in battlefield states, Schwarzman said he was okay with voters who were skeptical of the counts. Later in the month he said the outcome was “very certain” and that Mr. Biden had his full support.

When rioters stormed the Capitol, Mr. Schwarzman denounced their actions in a statement to Blackstone staff and Schwarzman scholars as “insurrection” and “affront to the democratic values ​​we hold dear”.

However, when a number of companies and trade organizations announced that they would withdraw financial support from those who opposed the confirmation of the election, at least two alumni wrote to Mr Schwarzman, expressing concerns about his financial support for the objectors. They said he didn’t answer.

Frustrated scholars discussed a group letter. Mr. Kitchen and his former classmate, Ricky Altieri, a 28-year-old law student from Yale, distributed drafts through WeChat, Text, and Signal, and eventually settled on a five-paragraph note. He urged Mr Schwarzman to pledge never to donate to any politician or political group that “supports Trump’s offer to reject the results of the 2020 US presidential election.”

“We believe donations to such candidates would violate the most basic principles of Schwarzman scholars and damage their reputation,” the letter said.

In his response, which immediately caught on among current and former scholars, Mr. Schwarzman pushed back and wrote that he had publicly supported the confirmation of Mr. Biden’s victory. Although the large number of objectors left him disappointed and confused, they “acted legally under the Constitution”.

He added: “In a democracy, it is important to continue to rely on our constitutional system and not voluntarily agree to be silenced.”

Some of the scientists seemed to agree – citing the influence of the program as one of the reasons.

Jacko Walz, 25, a New York-based strategy advisor who focuses on international development in Latin America, said the program raised his awareness of the world around him and taught him about leadership and moral courage.

“I think these topics are really taught authentically there,” said Walz. “And now that I’ve graduated, I hope to practice it all the time.”

Categories
Politics

Two Proud Boys members indicted for conspiracy in U.S. Capitol riots

Members of the right-wing extremist group Proud Boys make “OK” hand gestures indicating “white power” as supporters of US President Donald Trump gather in front of the US Capitol to oppose the certification of the results of the 2020 US presidential election United States Protest Congress in Washington, USA, January 6, 2021.

Jim Urquhart | Reuters

Two members of the far-right nationalist group, the Proud Boys, were tried in federal court Friday for conspiring to obstruct law enforcement and other charges related to their participation in the January 6th deadly riot at the Capitol.

Dominic Pezzola, 43, from Rochester, New York, and William Pepe, 31, from Beacon, New York, were initially prosecuted and arrested earlier this month, according to a press release from the US Department of Justice.

The men were charged with conspiracy, disorder, unlawful entry into buildings or properties, and disorderly and disruptive behavior in buildings or properties on Friday in federal court in DC.

Pezzola is also charged with obstructing an official trial; additional number of riots and aiding and abetting riot; Theft of US personal property; attack, resist, or hinder certain officers; Destruction of state property; and engage in physical violence in a confined building or site.

Pepe was a Metro Transit Authority employee who, according to an affidavit, used a sick day to travel to DC for the planned riot. The agency suspended him.

Pezzola, a retired U.S. Marine, was filmed using a police sign to break a window and break through the Capitol. Witnesses also told authorities that Pezzola, known to some as “Spaz,” said he would have killed Vice President Mike Pence and House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi if he had the chance, according to an affidavit.

Prosecutors also said that Pezzola posted a video on social media smoking a cigar in the Capitol and saying, “Victory smoke in the Capitol, guys.”

Categories
Politics

Nancy Pelosi backs Trump impeachment after DC riots

U.S. Spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from California, speaks during a press conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC on Wednesday, December 30, 2020.

Ting Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images

House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi urged the House of Representatives to press ahead with impeachment if President Donald Trump does not resign after helping fuel the deadly mob takeover of the U.S. Capitol, she said Friday.

“It is the hope of the members that the president resigns immediately,” said the California Democrat in a statement after a call to her caucus. “But if he doesn’t, I have instructed the regulatory committee to stand ready to push legislation on Congressman Jamie Raskin’s 25th amendment and impeachment.”

The House Rules Committee is expected to expedite the impeachment process without hearing or voting by the committee. Those steps would slow the process down just days before Trump left office on Jan. 20. The separate Pelosi bill, drafted by Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, would formally set up a commission for Vice President Mike Pence and the cabinet could remove Trump from office.

The president has given no indication that he will consider resigning. The vice president reportedly denies appeal to the 25th amendment.

The House has been preparing to indict Trump an unprecedented second time after the President’s supporters stormed the Capitol on Wednesday and delayed Congress formal counting of President-elect Joe Biden’s election victory. At least five people, including a US Capitol police officer, died as a result of the attack on lawmakers.

Raskin and Rep. David Cicilline, DR.I., and Ted Lieu, D-Calif., Plan to introduce at least one impeachment article on Monday referring to Trump causing the riots, NBC News reported.

Trump spoke to his supporters before they marched on the Capitol and voiced conspiracy theories that cost him the election. He lied to her about the results for two months before confirming Thursday that a “new government” would take over.

In a draft impeachment trial, “Incitement to Insurrection,” received by NBC News, Trump is accused of “involvement in high crimes and misdemeanors by intentionally inciting violence against the United States government.” It goes on to say that Trump “threatened the integrity of the democratic system, disrupted peaceful transfers of power, and compromised a coordinated branch of government by” betraying “his confidence as President in order to prevent the apparent harm to the people of the United States.”

The content of the article can change before Monday. In a tweeted statement, Lieu said the measure has more than 150 co-sponsors. He added that “doing nothing is not an option”.

Massachusetts MP Katherine Clark, the fourth-tier House Democrat, previously told CNN that the Chamber could take action against Trump “as early as the middle of next week.”

Democrats have called for Trump to be removed as they warn that he could further deteriorate democratic institutions or endanger more lives in his final days in office.

In a statement Friday, White House spokesman Judd Deere said the indictment, “A president with 12 days remaining will only serve to further divide our great country.”

It’s unclear if Democrats have enough time to remove the president before inauguration day – or how many Republicans will join them. Kevin McCarthy, minority chairman of the House of Representatives, who opposed counting Biden’s election victories in Arizona and Pennsylvania after the mob attacked the Capitol, spoke out against impeachment because it would “only divide our country further.”

Pelosi and Senate Minority Chairman Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., on Thursday called on Pence and Trump’s cabinet to remove Trump, citing the 25th amendment. They said he could not stay in office after instigating a “riot”. More than 190 other lawmakers, only one of whom is Republican, have also called for Trump to be removed since the attack.

Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska, called on Trump to resign but did not comment on the impeachment.

Pelosi and Schumer said invoking the 25th amendment, which requires support from Pence and a majority in the cabinet, is the quickest way to ensure the president leaves office. While officials like Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo discussed the prospect of Trump being removed, they decided not to take the move for now.

The day after hundreds of rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol, House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi said again that Vice President Mike Pence should invoke the 25th amendment to recall President Donald Trump, otherwise she will face impeachment proceedings during a press conference The President will usher in Capitol Hill in Washington, DC January 7, 2021.

Melina Mara | The Washington Post | Getty Images

In a letter to the Democrats on Friday, Pelosi said she and Schumer “hope to hear about it.” [Pence] as soon as possible “on whether to invoke the 25th Amendment.

“If the president does not leave office immediately and willingly, Congress will continue our action,” she wrote.

House Justice Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler, DN.Y., said Thursday that lawmakers could take steps to expedite the impeachment process.

“We have limited time to act,” said Nadler in a statement. “The nation cannot afford a lengthy process, and I support putting impeachment proceedings right on the floor of the House.”

According to NBC, Pelosi wanted to speak to Biden about the process on Friday. The president-elect said Friday that he would leave it to Congress to decide what action to take before it is inaugurated.

The Democratic house would have enough support to indict Trump, likely with a handful of Republican votes. The chamber did this once in December 2019.

But the GOP-controlled Senate, which acquitted the president last year, could not follow suit. Only one Republican – Mitt Romney of Utah – voted to remove Trump after his first impeachment trial.

Until elected Democratic Senators Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff of Georgia are sworn in to seal a Democratic majority, Republicans will have a 51-48 lead in the Senate. A two-thirds vote to remove Trump would require 66 votes, with 18 Republicans on board.

At least one Republican who first voted against removing Trump would now consider doing so more seriously.

“When the House gets together and has a lawsuit, I would definitely consider what articles they could move because, like I told you, I believe the President disregarded his oath of office … what he did was evil” , Senator Ben Sasse, R-Neb., Told CBS on Friday.

Senator Lindsey Graham, RS.C., argued in a Friday tweet that the charges against Trump would now “do more harm than good.” He said efforts to remove a president who contributed to a siege of the Capitol “would not only be unsuccessful in the Senate, it would set a dangerous precedent for the future of the presidency.”

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Politics

Trump won’t attend Biden’s inauguration after U.S. Capitol riots

U.S. President Donald Trump listens during a meeting in Washington, DC, the United States, on Monday, June 15, 2020.

Doug Mills | NYTimes | Getty Images

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump announced on Friday that he will not attend the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden, who will take command in less than two weeks.

Trump isn’t the first outgoing president to skip his successor’s inauguration. The others, according to the White House Historic Association, were Presidents John Adams, John Quincy Adams, and Andrew Johnson. Like Trump, Johnson was also charged.

“For everyone who asked, I won’t go to the inauguration on January 20th,” Trump tweeted. It was his third tweet since Twitter unblocked his account after a 12-hour ban over the deadly riot it sparked at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday.

Biden said in a press conference on Friday that he agreed that Trump should not attend the inauguration.

“On the way here I was told that he said he would not show up at the inauguration: one of the few things he and I ever agreed on,” Biden said.

Biden’s victory was projected by all major news agencies in mid-November and confirmed by votes by the electoral college in mid-December. The Republican president has falsely insisted that he won a “landslide” and has baselessly claimed that his re-election was stolen by massive election fraud.

His refusal to accept the election results culminated on Wednesday when swarms of his supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol and derailed the Congressional process to count the votes and confirm Biden’s November 3rd election victory.

Vice President Mike Pence and Second Lady Karen Pence have not decided whether they will attend, said Pence spokesman Devin O’Malley. Biden said Friday that Pence is welcome to attend the inauguration.

Former President Barack Obama and former First Lady Michelle Obama will attend Biden’s inauguration. Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who attended Trump’s inauguration, plan to attend Biden’s inauguration, according to a Clintons spokesman. Former President George W. Bush and former First Lady Laura Bush have also announced that they will attend. The bushes attended the inaugurations of former President Barack Obama and Trump.

Former President Jimmy Carter will not be in attendance due to Covid and health conditions, according to a spokesman. 96 year old Carter, the oldest living president. and former first lady Rosalyn Carter attended the inaugurations of Obama and Trump.

Trump’s decision not to attend Biden’s inauguration comes a day after he finally conceded the presidential election.

In a nearly three-minute video released Thursday, Trump admitted, without mentioning Biden’s name, that “a new government will be inaugurated on January 20.”

“My focus is now on ensuring a smooth, orderly and seamless transfer of power,” said the president in his first video statement after the uprising.

“Now the minds have to be cooled and the calm restored. We have to get on with business in America,” said Trump of the pandemic in the US Capitol.

“For those who have committed violence and destruction, you are not representing our country. And for those who have broken the law, you will pay,” Trump said.

Five people died in the violence, including a Capitol police officer. The White House expressed condolences on Thursday for the deaths.

Trump had encouraged thousands of supporters during a rally outside the White House on Wednesday to march to the Capitol to protest the historically ceremonial procedures regarding the election of the electoral college.

As protesters besieged the Capitol, Trump, who had returned to the White House after his speech, told supporters in a tweet video: “You have to go home now.” The president stopped condemning the violence and told the mob, “We love you, you are very special.”

Pro-Trump supporters storm the U.S. Capitol following a rally with President Donald Trump on January 6, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Samuel Corum | Getty Images

Following the violence, Pentagon and local DC officials attempted to explain why the National Guard forces were not deployed immediately.

Army secretary Ryan McCarthy, who is in charge of the DC Guard, said Thursday that law enforcement and defense officials received conflicting information prior to the riot.

“There were estimates of 80,000, there were estimates of 20-25. Coming back to pure intelligence, it was” all across the board, “McCarthy said when asked about crowd control preparations.

Pentagon officials also said they had timely approved requests from DC Mayor Muriel Bowser.

Bowser said the restrictions imposed by the Pentagon on the deployment of troops hampered their ability to deploy forces quickly when conditions worsened.

Trump said in the video on Thursday that he had “immediately” dispatched members of the National Guard to the Capitol to contain the unrest. However, the New York Times reported that the president had initially turned down requests to mobilize these troops.

By the weekend, 6,200 National Guard employees will be stationed in the country’s capital and will stay in the region for at least 30 days. The month-long mobilization ensures that the members of the National Guard are present at the dedication in front of the US Capitol.

Categories
Business

Flight attendant unions elevate alarms about disruptive vacationers after pro-Trump riots at Capitol

A flight attendant collects trash on a flight aboard a Boeing 737 Max from Dallas Fort Worth Airport to Tulsa, Oklahoma, December 2, 2020.

Carlo Allegri | Reuters

The country’s largest flight attendant unions on Wednesday raised security concerns over politically motivated flight disruptions after a pro-Trump mob stormed the Capitol and demanded that the presidential election results be overturned.

The union’s comments came after at least two disruptions on board flights to Washington, DC, including a Delta Air Lines flight with Utah Republican Senator Mitt Romney that saw some passengers singing “traitors.” Delta said it was aware of the incident and that “our crew quickly resolved and resolved the problem”. A spokeswoman for the senator did not comment.

“The mob mentality behavior that took place on multiple flights to the DC area yesterday was unacceptable and threatened the safety of every single person on board,” said Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, which represents approximately 50,000 cabin crew members United, Alaska, and more than a dozen other airlines.

The unrest in the Capitol is another concern [participants’] Departure from the DC area, “said Nelson.” Actions against our democracy, our government and the freedom we claim as Americans must exclude these people from freedom of escape. “

On an American Airlines flight to Dulles International Airport earlier this week, passengers shouted and cursed each other, forcing the flight attendant to turn on dimmed cabin lights and order passengers to their seats. This is evident from a video shared by Twitter user @ MaranieRae who said she was on the flight.

Americans are reviewing the incident, said spokesman Curtis Blessing. “We welcome our excellent crew members for their professionalism in de-escalating a tense situation on board and bringing our customers safely to their destination,” he said.

Julie Hedrick, president of the Association of Professional Flight Attendants, which represents American Airlines’ more than 25,000 flight attendants, said in a statement that the union “is incredibly concerned about the recent politically motivated incidents on board passenger aircraft.

“Regardless of political belief, the cabin of an airliner must necessarily be a quiet environment for the safety of everyone on board,” she said.

Cabin crew unions did not demand tolerance for such incidents. Interfering with the duties of a flight crew member is illegal and stubborn passengers can be fined $ 25,000.

The airlines said they are taking various precautions to protect employees, including moving flight crews to airport hotels to avoid locations in central Washington DC

American Airlines also doesn’t sell alcohol on board flights to and from Washington DC and has increased staff at airports in DC, US spokesman Blessing said.

Categories
Politics

Trump Cupboard officers condemn Capitol riots, however keep away from criticizing the president

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo (L) and Vice President Mike Pence listen as President Donald Trump speaks about the government shutdown on January 25, 2019 in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC. – Trump says he will sign a government reopening bill by February 15.

Brendan Smialowski | AFP | Getty Images

WASHINGTON – Members of President Donald Trump’s 23-member cabinet on Wednesday issued sharp reprimands against violence in the nation’s Capitol, forcing lawmakers to halt the process of declaring Joe Biden’s victory in the presidential election.

However, officials stopped criticizing the president, who urged his supporters to take action.

Trump had encouraged thousands of supporters during a rally outside the White House to march to the Capitol to protest the historically ceremonial procedures. Trump returned to the White House after his speech and later said in a tweet video to supporters, “You have to go home now.”

“This was a fraudulent choice … but you have to go home,” Trump said, telling the protesters, “We love you. You are very special” before finishing his remarks.

In a series of tweets on Wednesday evening, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo described the storming of the US Capitol as “unacceptable”.

“Lawlessness and unrest – here or around the world – are always unacceptable,” wrote the nation’s top diplomat.

“Let us quickly bring justice to the criminals involved in this unrest,” wrote Pompeo, adding, “America is better than what we saw today.”

Acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen wrote in a statement: “The violence against our nation’s Capitol is an intolerable attack on a fundamental institution of our democracy.”

Earlier on Wednesday, the Justice Department had dispatched hundreds of law enforcement officers and agents from the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and the US Marshals Service to quell protests.

Labor Secretary Eugene Scalia called the unrest “a low point in the history of American democracy”.

Acting Secretary of the Homeland Security Department, Chad Wolf, also condemned the violent pamphlet that “no one has the right to attack a federal institution regardless of their motivation.”

He added that those involved in the riot should be held accountable for their actions.

The Secretary for Housing and Urban Development, Ben Carson, also participated in calls for an end to violence in Washington.

“End this violence now. Violence is never an appropriate response, regardless of legitimate concern. Please remember, if a house is divided against itself, that house cannot stand,” Carson wrote.

Minister of Health and Human Services Alex Azar wrote that he was “disgusted” by the violence in the US Capitol.

“Physical violence and the desecration of this sacred symbol of our democracy must come to an end,” added Azar.

“Most importantly, you are all safe. Please take care of yourself and your loved ones,” wrote Azar in a subsequent tweet.

In a tweet on Wednesday evening, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin wrote: “Violence is always unacceptable. We must respect our constitution and our democratic process.”

Similarly, Trade Secretary Wilbur Ross wrote on Twitter that “violence is never the right solution”.

“The eyes of American children and students – the emerging generation who will inherit the republic we are leaving – are watching what goes on in Washington today,” wrote Elisabeth DeVos, Trump’s Secretary of Education, adding, “we need to give them a better one.” Give an example. “

“The disruption and violence must end, the law must be obeyed, and the work of the people must continue,” wrote DeVos.