Categories
Entertainment

Evaluation: Preventing for the Proper to Dance Giselle

As a young dancer, Katy Pyle related to Giselle, the ballet heroine who is betrayed by a nobleman. That — and a weak heart — causes the character to go mad and die. For Pyle, the draw was Giselle’s unwavering dedication to dance, specifically to ballet.

But getting the chance to dance such an ethereal role was not likely to happen. Pyle, who uses the pronouns they and them, was strong and was told by teachers, “You would have had a great career if you had been born a boy.”

With their inclusive company, Ballez, Pyle wants to widen access to the art form: to give ballet back to dancers who may have also lost their connection to it but not their desire to dance it on their own terms. In recent years, Pyle has transformed traditional ballets like “Firebird” and “Sleeping Beauty”; now they debut a virtual reimagining inspired by “Giselle.”

There’s a twist. In “Giselle of Loneliness,” seven dancers audition for the lead part, performing their own mad scene for viewers instructed to rank them from one to five in categories ranging from jumps and turns to more interpretive prompts: “virginal,” “hysterical” and “suffering.” For the opening-night stream, which was performed live for an audience, there was a score sheet to fill out along the way.

In Pyle’s production, presented by the Joyce Theater through June 23, there is no actual Albrecht, the nobleman who masquerades as a peasant to win Giselle’s love. Here, Albrecht represents ballet: that thing you love until it crushes your spirit.

As the dancers sail and stumble and wobble through their solos — on more than one occasion, gasping for air — their scrappy renderings become less of an audition than excavations of pain and buried emotions. Performances reveal moments of humor mixed with fury. Wigs help on both accounts, but there are individual touches, too: The glare Alexandra Waterbury interjects between steps or Charles Gowin’s irritation as he yanks off his ballet slippers and whips them into the wings.

Maxfield Haynes (they/them), a stunning dancer in a beehive wig that eventually comes off — along with their costume — places the skirt of their dress over their head like a bride’s veil, a foreshadowing of the ballet’s second act. Each solo ends in death. Between auditions, the host, Christine Darrell (Deborah Lohse), commands us to vote. Within her is a dash of Myrtha, the imperious ruler of the Wilis, the spirits of young women betrayed by their lovers.

She sits with the judges, played by Meg Harper and Janet Panetta — New York dance royalty — gesticulating as if a real discussion is taking place. At first, Pyle’s concept is intriguing, but the competition gimmick grows tedious. By the time the seventh dancer rolls around, you’re kind of like, enough.

More moving than these audition performances is the writing that accompanies the dancers’ bios. “In a way, Giselle is this unattainable thing,” MJ Markovitz says in the program. “But at the same time I think my performing my version is the rejection of all of these things, and all of these preconceptions.” Haynes writes about feeling betrayed by a world that wouldn’t let them dance on pointe, that only saw them as a man: “Ballet to me is like a prison with flowers.”

By the end, “Giselle of Loneliness” is a lush garden of bodies: more of an awakening than a dance of death, as in the original. The dancers stand nervously in front of the curtain in bathrobes waiting for Lohse to announce the winner of the competition; then they turn on her. Stretching an arm with a rigid, flexed hand, they become Pyle’s version of Wilis as they slowly spin amid increasing darkness. A curtain parts to a stage full of swirling dry ice.

At first it’s an ominous sight, these rotating dervishes in bathrobes, but soon their chests pitch forward and their robes open. Joined by Lohse and, eventually, the judges, the aspiring Giselles re-emerge dressed in Pyle’s shiny, transparent costumes in shades of pink and canary as they glide in and out of formal patterns with gratefulness and glee.

It’s sweet. What has always stood out about Pyle’s dances isn’t the battle between strength and delicacy, or fighting against ballerina stereotypes, but the way the dancers temper their rawness with sincerity. There is joy and abandon. Vulnerability? Always.

In the end, no votes were tallied. It was never about winners and losers: What matters is how these dancers, guided by Giselle, find their way back to ballet. It’s personal. And there’s room for all.

Giselle of Loneliness

Through June 23, joyce.org

Categories
Entertainment

Overview: Christopher Wheeldon Creates a Memorable Realm

Christopher Wheeldon’s new work for the Pacific Northwest Ballet is called “Curious Kingdom”. Since the music is exclusively French, the title could refer to France, although it has been a long time since that country had a king. Or maybe the alliterative phrase and its adjective “Alice in Wonderland” allude to contemporary ballet.

Whatever the title means, what’s important is that Wheeldon created a distinctive and memorable realm. This does not apply to the other premiere of Pacific Northwest’s latest digital programming (available through Monday on the company’s website): Edwaard Liang’s “The Veil Between Worlds”.

“Curious Kingdom” is accordingly chic. The tops of Harriet Jung and Reid Bartelme’s unitards are cleverly shaded to appear like the bodices of strapless dresses. While the music changes from piano pieces by Satie and Ravel to songs by Edith Piaf, the dancers decorate with mesh overlays, short or elbow-length gloves, tulle skirts and large bows in pink. In the lighting design by Reed Nakayama, the stage floor shines like a reflecting pool, underlaid by a sequence of individual colors: gold, green, blue, purple.

Smartly dressed, Wheeldon’s choreography, mainly solos and duets, retains a glamorous languor and achieves moments of exquisite beauty. Satie’s “Gnossiennes” combine the work with the poetic purity of Frederick Ashton’s “Monotones”, a connection that deserves long lines that suddenly break. A duet is a miracle of interlocking flamingo shapes. Others are more mirror-like and are based on the music, some of which come from Ravel’s “Miroirs” suite. To all of this, the piaf sections add a bit of color and cabaret. The excellent Lucien Postlewaite, a kind of faun in his opening solo, ends with a stylish hint of drag.

Liang’s “Veil”, on the other hand, is characterless. The music, a new composition by Oliver Davis, sounds like a contemporary ballet score with paint by numbers, and Liang’s neoclassical choreography looks like something any skilled dance maker could have created in the past few decades. There is a literal veil – a large piece of silk thrown like a parachute or the handkerchief of a giant magician. But nothing about the light and harmless choreography seems magical.

Nevertheless, the dancers – especially Dylan Wald, who also shines in Wheeldon, and Jerome and Laura Tisserand, who are about to leave – look good and happy in it. And that’s important too.

Among American troops, Pacific Northwest has been one of the most successful in switching to digital programs to keep their dancers active and engage their audiences. Its latest offer is characteristic: beautifully filmed and packed with extra features, including a pure selection of music by the company’s first-class musicians. Aside from “Curious Kingdom”, the new works of the season aren’t extraordinary for me, but as someone who lives far from Seattle, I’m grateful for the chance to see and get to know these dancers.

In a program note, Peter Boal, the artistic director, boasts that the digital season has attracted subscribers in 50 states and 36 countries. “We won’t turn our backs on you,” he writes, promising not only that the company will go live on stage again in the fall, but also that the digital programming will continue. Both parts are good news.

Pacific Northwest Ballet, Program 6

See you Monday, pnb.org

Categories
Entertainment

Assessment: At Wave Hill, Trisha Brown Dances Match Proper In

After more than a year of performing and teaching online, the Trisha Brown Dance Company re-emerged before a live audience on Thursday evening. And not just in any old performance space, but on the tranquil, spectacular grounds of Wave Hill, the 28-acre oasis in the Bronx whose lush lawns and gardens look out over the Hudson River and Palisades.

The anticipation was heightened by this week’s stormy weather, as capricious as one of Brown’s dances. In place of performances originally scheduled for Tuesday and Wednesday, both canceled, the company offered two shorter, back-to-back programs in one night. It was worth the wait for the backdrop of nearly cloudless skies, which turned from blazing to pale blue as late afternoon heat gave way to dusk.

The selected pieces — four of Brown’s early works from the 1970s and an excerpt from her less frequently seen “Another Story as in falling” (1993) — migrated from the central Great Lawn, with its river views, to the sweeping North Lawn, with a stop at the elevated Aquatic Garden. Part of the “In Plain Site” series, which situates Brown’s work beyond theater walls, the program revealed, as this series often does, the adaptable nature of her choreography, its capacity to slip into unforced conversation with a new environment. Wherever it goes, it has a way of fitting in, not an intrusion but an extension of its surroundings.

That sense of belonging is also a testament to the company leaders who stage the work — in this case, the associate artistic director Carolyn Lucas — who know its architecture inside and out, and what settings will complement it. The cubic geometry of “Locus” (1975), performed by three dancers, each within the corners of a square platform, echoed the right angles of the pergola behind them, its stone columns and leafy canopy framing their measured reaching and folding.

“Solo Olos” (1976) wasn’t built for rolling and skidding in the grass, but it seemed that way as four performers followed the instructions of a fifth: to “reverse,” “branch” or “spill,” according to the score that guides this partly improvised work. (The dancer Cecily Campbell gave a helpful introduction orienting us to its structure.)

From those opening pieces, we were ushered up through winding paths to the Aquatic Garden, where Amanda Kmett’Pendry and Leah Ives stood facing each other on opposite sides of a long rectangular pool. As if poised to dive in, they danced “Accumulation” (1971), in which simple movements stack up one by one: rotating thumbs, a swerve of the hips, a rise up onto the balls of the feet. “Uncle John’s Band” by the Grateful Dead replaced what had until now been a spontaneous soundtrack of bird song and planes passing overhead.

On the expanse of the North Lawn, the full company of eight broke into pairs for “Leaning Duet I” (1970), in which partners walk side by side, grasping each other by the wrist and leaning in opposite directions, their feet making contact with each step. When two pairs meet, one threads under the bridge of the other’s linked arms. (During the second show, a shaft of golden-hour sunlight ran parallel to the dancers’ diagonal pathway.) It’s a game that often results in one partner tipping to the ground, to be hauled back up by the other, as both try to maintain the integrity of the shape. There are no mistakes, just trying and trying again.

In “Another Story,” also for eight dancers — who this time remained largely apart and upright — stillness brought the body and the landscape into focus. Gently creased limbs, suspended midstride, looked like scaled-down branches of a towering elm nearby.

But perhaps more than any discrete shape or structure, it’s the cycles within Brown’s work that made it such a natural fit at Wave Hill. Replete with stealthy repetition, with endings that bleed into beginnings, her vision merges just right with gardens in full bloom.

Categories
Entertainment

Any individual’s Daughter by Ashley C. Ford Assessment

When it comes to summarizing Ashley C. Ford’s childhood, “complicated” feels like an excuse, but it may be the only right way to put it. Full of pain and confusion, full of love and beauty, Ford describes those years in vivid, painful detail in her breathtaking debut memoir. Someone’s daughter, (from June 1st).

Ford grew up in Indiana and can’t imagine a world without her big, noisy, sprawling family, and especially the two women who take center stage: her mother and grandmother. Though sometimes charming and playful, Ford’s mother also violently punishes her children for seemingly minor offenses, and Ford learns to work around this obvious split in her personality, which she understands as the difference between her loving “mom” and her punishing “mother”. The tension and stress of waiting for the next outbreak lead to panic attacks, Ford’s precocious intellect that is strangled by fear and abuse. At the center of it all is the bleak absence of her father, who has been in jail for as long as Ford can remember – and no one will tell her why.

Full of pain and confusion, full of love and beauty, Ford describes those years in vivid, painful detail in her breathtaking debut memoir.

She longs for his love and protection, especially when puberty hits and older men start targeting her. Ford blames himself and learns to be ashamed. “My body grew into something that could only be perverted,” she writes. At the age of 13 a man stops to ask for her number. When Ford tells him her age, he gets angry. “Go home and tell your mother to dress you like you are thirteen,” he tells her. “You were almost not treated like someone’s child.” Ford looks at her jeans and T-shirt. “What about my clothes that say I’m not thirteen? What about me when I told the rest of the world I wasn’t a kid?”

Ford’s first relationship ends in a traumatic attack, and soon afterwards she finds out about her father’s crime. Her world is broken, her teenage years swallowed up in chaos and poverty. Ford eventually realizes she has to flee, even if it means leaving behind the family that defined her for so long.

For as much pain Ford goes through, her book glows with compassion. In her mother’s outbursts of anger, she recognizes intergenerational violence and emotional abuse, as well as a determined determination to protect her children. Ford herself wrestles with her love for her father, a man who has committed a terrible crime, and the guilt of knowing that she has to leave her family to live the life she wants. There are no proper solutions, only honest ones. In showing that, these sensitive and sharply written memoirs shine.

Outstanding quote

“In the silence of the nights that kept coming back at the end of each day, no matter how pleasant or productive the day had been, I wondered if something was wrong with me because I had loved my father in the first place. It made sense why anyone who knew the truth couldn’t look me in the eye when I asked. They didn’t want me to be ashamed, but they were already ashamed of me. I saw it on their faces and pointed in my direction. “

Read this if you want. . .

Like scorching memories Educated by Tara Westover, Boys of my youth by Jo Ann Beard and all by Glennon Doyle.

POPSUGAR Reading Challenge prompt (s)

If you’re reading this book for the 2021 POPSUGAR Reading Challenge, use it for the following prompts:

  • A book with three generations (grandparents, parents, child)
  • A book from 2021

How long does it take to read?

Give this one five to six days – it isn’t too long, but you should take your time on the difficult subject.

List this book. . .

Anyone who likes kinky, emotionally honest family sagas. It is also good to discuss and dissect with your book club.

The sweet spot summary

in the Someone’s daughter ($ 23), Ashley C. Ford reflects a childhood of pain and violence marked by her father’s imprisonment and her mother’s anger and loneliness to find the moments of love that lead her to peace.

Categories
Politics

Biden orders nearer evaluation of Covid origins as U.S. intel weighs Wuhan lab leak concept

Security personnel stand guard outside the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan as members of the World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus make a visit to the institute in Wuhan in China’s central Hubei province on February 3, 2021.

Hector Retamal | AFP | Getty Images

WASHINGTON – President Joe Biden on Wednesday announced that he has ordered a closer intelligence review of what he said were two equally plausible scenarios of the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Biden revealed that earlier this year he tasked the Intelligence Community with preparing “a report on their most up-to-date analysis of the origins of Covid-19, including whether it emerged from human contact with an infected animal or from a laboratory accident.”

“As of today, the U.S. Intelligence Community has ‘coalesced around two likely scenarios’ but has not reached a definitive conclusion on this question,” Biden said in a statement.

“Here is their current position: ‘while two elements in the IC leans toward the former scenario and one leans more toward the latter – each with low or moderate confidence – the majority of elements do not believe there is sufficient information to assess one to be more likely than the other,” said the president.

Biden used the Intelligence Community’s traditional language when they provide assessments to a president. This includes explaining to the president when different agencies within the IC disagree, and always giving the president the level of confidence they have in the accuracy of the raw intelligence.

Biden issued the new directives as the origins of the coronavirus pandemic, still officially unknown, come under increasing scrutiny.

The hypothesis that the virus may have escaped from a laboratory, while initially dismissed by some as a conspiracy theory, has in recent months gained more mainstream traction.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky last week said in Senate testimony that a lab-leak origin “certainly” was “one possibility.”

White House officials told reporters Tuesday that China hasn’t been “completely transparent” in the global investigation into the origins of Covid-19, and that a full investigation is needed to determine whether the virus that’s killed almost 3.5 million people came from nature or a lab.

“We need to get to the bottom of this, whatever the answer may be,” White House senior covid-19 advisor Andy Slavitt told reporters at a covid briefing Tuesday. “We need a completely transparent process from China, we need the [World Health Organization] to assist in that matter and we don’t feel like we have that now.”

The World Health Organization said in March that it was “extremely unlikely” that the virus was introduced to humans through an accidental lab leak. But that report was heavily criticized by scientists who said the WHO gave the possibility of a lab accident short shrift compared with a natural-origin scenario..

“The report lacks crucial data, information, and access. It represents a partial and incomplete picture,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said at the time when asked about WHO’s stance on Covid’s origins.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which leads the nation’s 18 intelligence agencies, did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., did not immediately respond to CNBC.

This is breaking news. Please check back for updates.

—- CNBC’s Kevin Breuninger and Amanda Macias contributed to this story.

Categories
Business

Related Press Begins Overview of Social Media Coverage After Emily Wilder Firing

The Associated Press has launched a review of its social media guidelines after more than 150 employees publicly condemned the firing of a young journalist for violating these guidelines.

In a memo to global newsrooms Monday, the AP’s top editors said they heard the concerns of many journalists over the weekend and were “determined to broaden the conversation on the AP’s approach to social media.”

The news agency faced a backlash after Emily Wilder, a 22-year-old news worker who joined the company in Arizona, was fired on May 19, three weeks after she was hired.

Ms. Wilder, who graduated from Stanford University in 2020 and worked in the Republic of Arizona, said in a statement Friday that she was the subject of a campaign by Stanford College Republicans whose social media posts were based on their pro Palestine had drawn attention to activism at the university. She added that her editors had assured her that she would not be fired for her previous legal work.

“Less than 48 hours later, the AP fired me,” she said. “The reason given was that I allegedly violated The AP’s social media guidelines between my first day and Wednesday. In the meantime, powerful conservatives like Senator Tom Cotton, Ben Shapiro, and Robert Spencer have cursed me repeatedly online. When I asked my managers what exact tweets were violating the guidelines or how, they refused to tell me. “

Ms. Wilder, who is Jewish, tweeted about the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians while at The AP. In a tweet, she said that “using” Israel “but never” Palestine “or” war “but not” siege and occupation “are political choices – yet the media makes these exact decisions all the time without being biased to be marked. “

Dozens of AP journalists signed an open letter after Ms. Wilder’s dismissal, criticizing the news agency and asking for clarification on how it had violated the company’s social media guidelines.

In business today

Updated

May 25, 2021 at 5:16 p.m. ET

“The lack of clarity about the violations of social media policy has made AP journalists afraid of getting involved in any form on social media – often critical for our work,” the letter said.

Ten editorial directors responded in a memo on Monday to staff announcing a plan to review their policies. They said formal groups would discuss ideas and make recommendations, and a committee of staff would review the recommendations by September 1st. Any policy changes would then be brought up in the next round of contract negotiations with the union representing AP workers, the News Media Guild.

“One of the issues raised in the past few days is the belief that social media restrictions prevent you from being your real self, and that it disproportionately does this to color journalists, LGBTQ journalists and others who are often attacked online harms, “says the memo.

The editors said in the note that “much of the coverage” of Ms. Wilder’s dismissal does not accurately reflect “a difficult decision that we did not make lightly”.

Lauren Easton, a spokeswoman for The AP, said the company had generally not commented on staff, but confirmed that Ms. Wilder has been fired for violating social media policy.

“We understand that other news organizations may not have made the same decision,” she said. “While many news organizations offer viewpoints, opinion columnists, and editorials, AP does not. We do not express an opinion. Our foundation is fact-based, unbiased reporting. “

Categories
Business

A.P. Begins Evaluation of Social Media Coverage After Journalist’s Firing

The Associated Press has launched a review of its social media guidelines after more than 150 employees publicly condemned the firing of a young journalist for violating these guidelines.

In a memo to global newsrooms Monday, the AP’s top editors said they heard the concerns of many journalists over the weekend and were “determined to broaden the conversation on the AP’s approach to social media.”

The news agency faced a backlash after Emily Wilder, a 22-year-old news worker who joined the company in Arizona, was fired on May 19, three weeks after she was hired.

Ms. Wilder, who graduated from Stanford University in 2020 and worked in the Republic of Arizona, said in a statement Friday that she was the subject of a campaign by Stanford College Republicans whose social media posts were based on their pro Palestine had drawn attention to activism at the university. She added that her editors had assured her that she would not be fired for her previous legal work.

“Less than 48 hours later, the AP fired me,” she said. “The reason given was that I allegedly violated The AP’s social media guidelines between my first day and Wednesday. In the meantime, powerful conservatives like Senator Tom Cotton, Ben Shapiro, and Robert Spencer have cursed me repeatedly online. When I asked my managers what exact tweets were violating the guidelines or how, they refused to tell me. “

Ms. Wilder, who is Jewish, tweeted about the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians while at The AP. In a tweet, she said that “using” Israel “but never” Palestine “or” war “but not” siege and occupation “are political choices – yet the media makes these exact decisions all the time without being biased to be marked. “

Dozens of AP journalists signed an open letter after Ms. Wilder’s dismissal, criticizing the news agency and asking for clarification on how it had violated the company’s social media guidelines.

In business today

Updated

May 25, 2021 at 5:16 p.m. ET

“The lack of clarity about the violations of social media policy has made AP journalists afraid of getting involved in any form on social media – often critical for our work,” the letter said.

Ten editorial directors responded in a memo on Monday to staff announcing a plan to review their policies. They said formal groups would discuss ideas and make recommendations, and a committee of staff would review the recommendations by September 1st. Any policy changes would then be brought up in the next round of contract negotiations with the union representing AP workers, the News Media Guild.

“One of the issues raised in the past few days is the belief that social media restrictions prevent you from being your real self, and that it disproportionately does this to color journalists, LGBTQ journalists and others who are often attacked online harms, “says the memo.

The editors said in the note that “much of the coverage” of Ms. Wilder’s dismissal does not accurately reflect “a difficult decision that we did not make lightly”.

Lauren Easton, a spokeswoman for The AP, said the company had generally not commented on staff, but confirmed that Ms. Wilder has been fired for violating social media policy.

“We understand that other news organizations may not have made the same decision,” she said. “While many news organizations offer viewpoints, opinion columnists, and editorials, AP does not. We do not express an opinion. Our foundation is fact-based, unbiased reporting. “

Categories
Entertainment

Evaluate: The Charms and Pitfalls of Dancing the Gods on Digital camera

Since 2011, the World Music Institute’s Dancing the Gods festival has consistently delivered high-quality Indian dance to New York. Last year, like so much else, it was canceled. This year, like so much else, it’s virtual — which means that another stage experience is being mediated by cameras, with all the attendant possibilities and pitfalls.

In at least one respect, classical Indian dance should benefit from the camera’s eye. One of its glories is storytelling, often concentrated in facial expressions — details that close-ups can magnify. But just as a stage actor’s performance pitched to the second balcony can seem too broad, too loud, when it fills a screen, so can a dancer’s.

That’s what I came to feel about Rama Vaidyanathan’s contribution. Vaidyanathan appears on a porch in Delhi, embodying three women in love in three Bharatanatyam pieces titled “Vexed,” “Arrogant” and “Anxious.” (The festival, available on demand for the next three weeks, comes in two installments, each featuring a headliner filmed in India and an opening act who’s a New York local.)

As is common, Vaidyanathan introduces each dance with a synopsis. That’s helpful for those who don’t know the story or language of the accompanying song, but also useful for anyone wanting to track how a simple scenario can be elaborated and expanded into song and dance. Perhaps it was the true-confessions tone of her synopses that put me off. “I knew something was wrong when my friends started behaving strangely with me,” begins one, a story of a woman whose lover kisses and tells, “the worst thing that can happen to a woman.”

Vaidyanathan is a masterful artist, but in the collapsed distance of film, her program’s emphasis on what the text called “feminine wiles” was too much: too much eye-rolling, too much attitude. Only in the final episode, when her character is extolling the beauty of her lover, Krishna, did the dance expand and vibrate with the energy of a god.

In the second program, Surupa Sen appears at Nrityagram, the village in southern India where she has lived and worked for three decades. She, too, offers three solos in her style, Odissi; three poems from the Gita Govinda; three depictions of women in love with gods. But these achieve an immediacy and intimacy suited to the closer view.

The first is a prepandemic stage performance, which shows Sen’s authority in her usual setting. But I preferred the second two: gorgeous compositions choreographed by the Odissi guru Kelucharan Mohapatra and filmed in a cozy dance studio at Nrityagram.

In one, the woman waits in a bower for her lover, adorning herself, and the anticipation, so strong it hurts, comes through in the physicality and rhythms of the dance. If that’s before, the final piece is after, a postcoital scene. Here, the languor and softness of Sen’s performance are very far from the stagy attitudes of Vaidyanathan. The camera captures something close to emotional nakedness.

That’s a gain for a virtual festival, whereas the festival’s opening acts are mostly misfires. In “Willow,” the New Jersey-based Kathak dancer Jin Won goes in for double exposures and crass music reminiscent of a cheap horror film; it buries her skill. In “The Sun Unto a Day,” the Bharatanatyam dancer Sonali Skandan places herself in cyclorama void like the one on “Last Week Tonight With John Oliver”; it exposes her imprecision.

Dancing the Gods

Through June 12 (Program 1) and June 13 (Program 2), worldmusicinstitute.org.

Categories
Entertainment

Assessment: Invoice Robinson’s Rags-to-Riches Faucet Story

Every year, National Tap Dance Day is celebrated on or around May 25 — the birthday of Bill Robinson, the most prominent Black tap dancer of the first half of the 20th century. Seldom, though, do Tap Day events honor Robinson himself.

Since 2018, three of the contemporary scene’s most prominent tap dancers — Derick K. Grant, Jason Samuels Smith and Dormeshia — have been celebrating Tap Day in Harlem with a festival they call Tap Family Reunion, a few days of classes and a show they collectively choreograph and direct. This year, it’s all virtual, and the show, presented for the first time by the Joyce Theater, is streaming on demand on the theater’s website through June 3.

This one is about Robinson. It’s called “The Mayor of Harlem,” after the honorary title that Robinson earned as an informal philanthropist in his neighborhood: appearing at countless benefit performances, covering back rent and bail. It tells his rags-to-riches story.

Or, really, it tells a rags-to-riches story that could almost be anyone’s. Maurice Chestnut, as Robinson, adds some routine narration to danced scenes of the train ride to the city, the big break, the Hollywood years. The familiar structure is essentially scaffolding for a series of period-style dance numbers.

Fortunately, Chestnut is an excellent dancer. Unlike Robinson, though, he’s not much of an entertainer, and his letter-but-not-the-spirit version of Robinson’s signature staircase dance, performed on a squashed version of the staircase, has itself a squashed quality. In place of Robinson’s starched erectness and ease, Chestnut is coiled like a boxer. Later, when he drops the imitation and lowers his heels into his own more free-flowing style, it’s a release and a relief — a high point of the show.

But Chestnut doesn’t have to carry “Mayor of Harlem” alone. Along with an able jazz quartet led by the trumpeter Ryan Stanbury, the show features a six-member ensemble that actually handles most of the dancing — a tap chorus significantly more skilled and sophisticated, technically and rhythmically, than usually found on Broadway stages, when Broadway was open.

With its skilled hoofers and rote dramaturgy, “Mayor of Harlem” is nice but not so interesting, except in two respects. The first is its attitude toward Robinson. In the 1996 Broadway musical “Bring in ‘da Noise, Bring in ‘da Funk” — the seminal production in the youth of the directors of “Tap Family Reunion,” a show in which they performed and which taught them tap history — Robinson was portrayed as a race traitor and sellout, a figure named Uncle Huck-a-Buck.

The program for “The Mayor of Harlem” calls him “a man who made the best of circumstances.” His Hollywood years with Shirley Temple are presented blankly, without comment, but then, out of nowhere, the ensemble dances angrily in front of a stock slide show of Black protest and they and Chestnut raise Black Power fists as a voice-over tells us that Robinson was “one of the greatest champions of justice and equality this country has ever seen.”

There are missed opportunities here, since Robinson’s biography contains relevant evidence — like the time he was stopping a mugging and was shot by a white policeman. A more serious treatment of Robinson would consider his complexity and the conflicted views of him — how, for example, many of those benefit performances were for police charities.

This isn’t that kind of show, but it is important in another way. Tap chorus dancing is a neglected tradition, and “The Mayor of Harlem” is really about the ensemble, as all Tap Family Reunion productions have been. The focus on the chorus can have the somewhat deadening effect of treating background as foreground. This show is most exciting when a member of the chorus breaks out, as when Amanda Castro impressively incarnates Jeni LeGon in the Robinson-LeGon number from the 1936 film “Hooray for Love.” It could be the birth of a star.

But an art form isn’t only its stars. As much as I might miss the appearance of Grant, Smith and Dormeshia in front of the curtain — canceling out a production’s weaknesses with their brilliance, as Robinson did — they caught the importance of their behind-the-scenes work in the title of their first Tap Family Reunion show, “Raising the Bar.”

The Mayor of Harlem

Through June 3, joyce.org.

Categories
Entertainment

Assessment: Olivia Rodrigo’s ‘Bitter’ Album Is a Critic’s Choose

Her paramours are playing these sorts of games, too. “Which lover will I get today?/Will you walk me to the door or send me home crying?” she sighs over the dampened piano of “1 Step Forward, 3 Steps Back.” And it’s on “Drivers License” where that realization fully crystallizes: “Guess you didn’t mean what you wrote in that song about me,” she gasps. There are few colder jolts than learning someone you loved was simply playing a role.

Rodrigo’s juggle is also embedded in her musical choices on “Sour,” which is written almost wholly by Rodrigo and produced almost wholly by Dan Nigro, formerly of the band As Tall as Lions (who also contributed songwriting). She plants a flag for the divided self right at the top of the album, on the spectacular “Brutal,” which begins with a few seconds of sober strings before she declares, “I want it to be, like, messy,” which it then becomes. That tug of war persists throughout the album: more polished songs like the singles and the rousing, Paramore-esque “Good 4 U” jostling with rawer ones like “Enough for You” and “Jealousy, Jealousy.”

“Traitor,” one of the album’s highlights, is a stark song masquerading as a bombastic one. “I kept quiet so I could keep you,” Rodrigo confesses, before arriving at an elegant way of understanding, if not quite accepting, how someone who loved you has moved on: “Guess you didn’t cheat/but you’re still a traitor.”

That songwriting flourish is emblematic of what Rodrigo has learned from Taylor Swift on this album (which, in shorthand, is Swift’s debut refracted through “Red”): nailing the precise language for an imprecise, complex emotional situation; and working through private stories in public fashion. There is residue of Swift throughout “Sour” — whether the way that “1 Step Forward, 3 Steps Back” interpolates “New Year’s Day,” or the “Cruel Summer”-esque chants on “Deja Vu.”

But really, Swift persists in the lens, which is relentlessly internal — Rodrigo only breaks out of it in a couple of places on the album, like on “Jealousy, Jealousy,” where she pulls back to assess the self-image damage that social media inflicts (“I wanna be you so bad, and I don’t even know you/All I see is what I should be”) and on the final track, “Hope Ur OK,” a melancholy turn that’s thoughtfully compassionate, but thematically out of step with the rest of the album.