Categories
Entertainment

‘The Viewing Sales space’ Evaluation: Do You See What I See?

More than ever, moving images — body cameras that monitor police conduct, the video review of athletic event rulings — purport to capture the incontestable truth. But can the “evidence,” framed and reliant on human interpretation, truly force us to see eye to eye?

In “The Viewing Booth,” the filmmaker Ra’anan Alexandrowicz tests this hypothesis.

Filmed at Temple University in a dark studio that resembles both a confessional and a laboratory, the documentary considers one young woman’s reactions to videos of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Singled out from a broader swath of students, Maia Levy, a Jewish American supporter of Israel, peruses a selection of videos — mostly by the human rights watchdog group B’Tselem — that she questions aloud, skeptical as to their authenticity. In one video, soldiers from the Israel Defense Forces raid a Palestinian family’s home in the middle of the night, awakening and interrogating several children. Levy, whom we observe voicing her objections in unforgiving close-up from the perspective of a computer camera, is convinced that the video is manipulating us to feel empathy for the family. Alexandrowicz watches the shared screen in an adjoining room, struck by Levy’s incredulity.

Six months later, Levy is invited back to the studio to review the footage of her responses, effectively replaying bits from the documentary’s first half with commentary from Levy and Alexandrowicz. In short: Images are not enough to challenge one’s beliefs.

Though moderately compelling to bear witness to one individual’s objections in real time, “The Viewing Booth” touches on gloomy truths about spectatorship in the digital era that might have felt novel a decade ago. Inundated as we are by traumatizing images and indiscriminate claims of “fake news,” it should come as no surprise that our ideological bubbles are actually quite difficult to burst.

The Viewing Booth
Not rated. In English, Arabic and Hebrew, with subtitles. In theaters.

Categories
Entertainment

‘The Final Mercenary’ Assessment: Nonetheless Kicking

At 60, Jean-Claude Van Damme has about as many features as birthdays. Given this productivity, the strangely addicting “JCVD” (2008) showed the Belgian thug pondering the options available to an aging action star.

“The Last Mercenary (Le Dernier Mercenaire)” comes across as one of those options on Netflix, with Van Damme showing a mischievous self-awareness about himself and the genre that has nurtured him. As Richard Brumère, a famous secret service agent who allegedly once hit a rhinoceros with his bare hands, the actor is in excellent shape. It may take a little longer to film a stunt, but thanks to Thierry Arbogast’s camera skills, the seams are barely visible in the action.

That’s a good thing, because Richard prefers hands and feet to weapons. And when his estranged son (Samir Decazza) is falsely accused of the arms trade, Richard must return to Paris after a 25-year absence to put things right. This requires multiple disguises and international locations (the film was shot mostly in Ukraine), a new load of buddies, and probably a lot of stretching.

The plot (by director David Charhon and Ismaël Sy Savané) is a bloated mix of terrorism, stolen identity and father-son healing. The middle part hangs down and not all performances pop. (Though Nassim Lyes hangs it up with a shovel to play a “Scarface” -obossed villain.) But the fight scenes are witty and Van Damme delivers his lines with just the right dose of tired good humor.

“You have aged,” observes a former colleague (played by none other than Miou-Miou), and it is evidence of the tone of the film that the comment is anything but a burn, almost a caress.

The last mercenary
Not rated. In French, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 50 minutes. Watch on Netflix.

Categories
Entertainment

‘Ailey’ Assessment: A Poetic Have a look at the Man Behind the Dances

Too often, the idea of Alvin Ailey is reduced to a single dance: “Revelations.” His 1960 exploration of the Black experience remains a masterpiece, but it also overshadows the person who made it. How can an artist grow after such early success? Who was Alvin Ailey the man?

In “Ailey,” the director Jamila Wignot layers images, video and — most important — voice-overs from Ailey to create a portrait that feels as poetic and nuanced as choreography itself. Black-and-white footage of crowds filing into church, children playing, dance parties, and the dusty landscape of Texas (his birthplace) builds an atmosphere. Like Ailey’s dances, the documentary leaves you swimming in sensation.

Ailey’s story is told alongside the creation of “Lazarus,” a new dance by the contemporary choreographer Rennie Harris, whose homage to Ailey proposes an intriguing juxtaposition of past and present. In his search to reveal the man behind the legacy, Harris lands on the theme of resurrection. Ailey died in 1989, but his spirit lives on in his dancers.

But his early days weren’t easy. Born in 1931, Ailey never knew his father and recalls “being glued to my mother’s hip. Sloshing through the terrain. Branches slashing against a child’s body. Going from one place to another. Looking for a place to be. My mother off working in the fields. I used to pick cotton.”

He was only 4. Ailey spoke about how his dances were full of “dark deep things, beautiful things inside me that I’d always been trying to get out.”

All the while, Ailey, who was gay, remained intensely private. Here, we grasp his anguish, especially after the sudden death of his friend, the choreographer and dancer Joyce Trisler. In her honor, he choreographed “Memoria” (1979), a dance of loneliness and celebration. “I couldn’t cry until I saw this piece,” he says.

Ailey’s mental health was fragile toward the end of his life; Wignot shows crowds converging on sidewalks, but instead of having them walk normally, she reverses their steps. He was suffering from AIDS. Before his death, he passed on his company to Judith Jamison, who sums up his magnetic, enduring presence: “Alvin breathed in and never breathed out.”

Again, it’s that idea of resurrection. “We are his breath out,” she continues. “So that’s what we’re floating on, that’s what we’re living on.”

Ailey
Rated PG-13. Running time: 1 hour and 22 minutes. In theaters.

Categories
Entertainment

‘Can You Carry It: Invoice T. Jones and D-Man within the Waters’ Evaluate: Nonetheless Making Waves

What happens to a work of art when time displaces it from its original context and from the impulse that inspired it? That is a question that can elicit dry theories. But in Can You Bring It ?: Bill T. Jones and D-Man in the Waters, a new documentary by Tom Hurwitz and Rosalynde LeBlanc Loo, the answer is passionate and moving.

Jones is a co-founder of the Bill T. Jones / Arnie Zane Company, a modern dance group. It grew out of the performer duo that Jones formed with his partner Zane, who wasn’t a dancer in the early 1970s.

Zane died in 1988 of AIDS-related lymphoma. The film gives a moving overview of their work-life collaboration before delving into the choices Jones made after Zane’s death. One of these decisions was the piece “D-Man in the Waters”.

The dance was inspired by a series of group improvisations. It was a mirror of the troop’s experiences, their struggles and their losses. As a choreography, it has since been performed by dozen of college and professional companies. “Can you bring it with you?” Jones asks a group of dancers at Loyola Marymount College in 2016 as they prepare the piece under the direction of Loo, a former member of the Jones / Zane Company.

These students have little knowledge of AIDS, so Jones and Loo ask them to find points in their lives where they struggle as part of a student community and in other ways. The cut between vintage recordings by Company Jones / Zane and the student production as well as recordings from another contemporary production of the piece – recorded with an intimacy on stage that is reminiscent of the in-the-ring segments of Martin Scorsese’s “Raging Bull” – ensure an unusually lively documentary experience.

Can you bring it with you: Bill T. Jones and D-Man in the Waters
Not rated. Running time: 1 hour 34 minutes. In theaters.

Categories
Entertainment

Assessment: A Higher Day Dawns With Pam Tanowitz’s Witty New Dance

RED HOOK, NY – For a moment or two, Pam Tanowitz may have regretted the title of her latest dance: “I’ve been waiting for the echo of a better day.”

The sentence comes from a film by Jean-Luc Godard, and Tanowitz certainly meant the accusation of a return to live and in-person performances. But the work commissioned by the Bard SummerScape Festival is designed for outdoor use, and the premiere originally scheduled for Thursday has been canceled due to rain. So was the Friday show. The title threatened to become an explanation for the unprecedented premiere.

On Saturday, however, the weather cleared long enough for “I was Waiting” to make its debut. The wait was worth it. As for better days, since the pandemic began, I can only imagine a few dance experiences as exciting as this one.

Unlike many performances forced outdoors by coronavirus protocols, this one really took advantage of their surroundings. This wasn’t a dance that would have been better in a theater. It cannot have existed in one.

In the beginning, the setting was wonderful: Montgomery Place, a property next to Bard College that belongs to him and where Tanowitz works as a choreographer in residence. A pleasant walk (or a golf cart ride) around the grounds led to a steeply sloping strip of lawn that stretched from the balustrade and steps of a mansion to a pond with views of the Catskill Mountains and a sliver of the Hudson River.

We spectators sat on the lawn, isolated from each other in areas like circles on a twister board. String quintet players – including the violinist Jessie Montgomery, whose lively compositions served as the score – got ready on a covered platform. But where should the dancers dance?

Everywhere turned out. And that was the fame of that 45 minute work. First the audience had to turn back to look at the view like at a wedding to see how the first dancer – the brilliantly clear Zachary Gonder – flew down the slope and darted between the circles like a firefly. Other dancers followed, but the first surprise wasn’t in the foreground: there were dancers in the distance, dressed in bright yellow or blue, arabesques between the trees, visual echoes that expanded the dance.

This was the general effect of Tanowitz’s brilliant use of space: to stretch one’s attention with relish. Sometimes a couple of dancers would continue down by the pond while something else up in the mansion did something else. But this more-than-you-see simultaneity was just one option among many.

When a dancer caught our attention, one or two or three others would often emerge from the surrounding foliage: more visual echoes that, by changing the shape and direction of the dance, seemed to change the space around them. When the dancers embarked on a new path or ventured into new open grass, it was like illuminating landscape features and illuminating discoveries. When Melissa Toogood drove down from the balustrade to the pond in a solo part – and then past it to perform in a new place, closer to the river – the dimensions of the dance increased once more, as it is only possible outside. It was a funny move that aroused amazement.

This choreography of the room was enlivened by a movement vocabulary that is more complex, intricate and varied than one would expect from dancers in sneakers on wet and uneven terrain. These dancers – Jason Collins, Brittany Engel-Adams, Christine Flores, Lindsey Jones, Victor Lozano and Maile Okamura, and Gonder and Toogood – are marvels, alone and together. In slow sections they merged into sculptural groups of great, balanced beauty.

Their phrases had their own music, but it harmonized with Montgomery’s score and its oscillating rhythms, quickening pizzicati, scraps of gershwinesque tunes, folk songs and the roar of insects. Birds fell into the silence.

To me, the joys of “I Was Waiting” mirrored the joys of previous Tanowitz works, including the sublime “Four Quartets” that she debuted at Bard SummerScape (indoor) in 2018 and me of Ronald K’s bold, grand SummerScape program Brown / Evidence in 2019. This series builds a track record of dependable transcendence, a promise for better days.

Pam Tanowitz dance
Montgomery Square, July 10-11; bard.edu.

Categories
Entertainment

‘Final Summer season’ Assessment: Rising Pains

The film “Last Summer” plays like an extended montage that advertises the breathtaking views and the clear Mediterranean waters of southern Turkey. Like a migratory fish, the teenager Deniz (Fatih Sahin) is lucky enough to spend the summers on this beautiful coast in the coastal town where his family owns a cottage. This wafer-thin coming-of-age film (on Netflix) is set in the summer of 1997, when Deniz is out with his cool older sister Ebru (Aslihan Malbora) while he feeds the puppy love for her teasing beast Asli (Ece Cesmioglu). .

Director Ozan Aciktan is interested in how Deniz’s crush on Asli, a flirtatious young woman, reflects his longing for the confidence and thrill of adulthood. When he accompanies Asli and her friends to a high cliff, Deniz shows him jumping into the sea. Although he survived the fall, the cut on his foot is a sign that growing up is exciting, but not without pain.

The movie’s attention to Deniz’s growing pains is useful as Asli, a beautiful but blurry character, meets a charming older man and Deniz’s shy longing takes a jealous turn. Tension builds up on sunny days and sweaty nights. But at its climax, the film fails to fulfill its purpose. Asli’s feelings seem to change on a whim, and Deniz suffers no consequences for his mistakes. For all the beauty of its dazzling holiday setting, “Last Summer” drives by, but not to a satisfying destination.

Last summer
Not rated. In Turkish, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 41 minutes. Watch on Netflix.

Categories
Entertainment

Evaluate: A Composer Creates Her Masterpiece With ‘Innocence’

AIX-EN-PROVENCE, France – “Innocence”, the new opera by Kaija Saariaho, begins in a soft, gloomy gloom. A shadowy cymbal mist rises from long, ghastly tones in the bass and contrabassoon, before a screeching bassoon fragment penetrates the silence with melancholy singing.

It’s only a few seconds of music, but a mood has established itself – comprehensive, unforgettable and yet subtle. Before we know the plot of “Innocence”, we feel it: Something dark and deep has happened, out of which the memory swings into an uncertain future, engraved with grief.

We feel it again and again in the following hundred minutes when we get to know a tragedy and its aftermath. Great yet reserved, a thriller that is also a meditation, “Innocence” is the most powerful work Saariaho has written in his career in the fifth decade.

Seen here at the festival in Aix-en-Provence until July 12th (and streamed on arte.tv on Saturday), after its planned debut in 2020 was canceled, it would be the premiere of the year even in a normal season – even if his audiences weren’t so hungry for real, great, important live opera after so many months. It deserves to travel well beyond an already global itinerary: Helsinki, Amsterdam, London, San Francisco, the Metropolitan Opera in New York.

This is undoubtedly the work of a mature master who has mastered her resources so well that she can simply focus on telling a story and illuminating characters. In contrast to so many contemporary operas, “Innocence” – with the mighty London Symphony Orchestra, conducted with sensitivity and control by Susanna Malkki – does not seem like a sung piece with a more or less incoherent, artistically self-centered orchestral soundtrack.

In fact, during the performance I attended on Tuesday, I tried to listen only to the instrumental lines and their interplay from time to time, but despite the apparent virtuosity and density of the score, my ears kept lifting up to the stage, to the clear, relentless ones Action, the integrated theatrical whole. Porous and agile; Boils under and around the voices; and only occasionally, exploding briefly, is this music as a vehicle for exploring and intensifying the drama. It’s complex but confident enough not to exist just for its own sake.

With a libretto by the Finnish writer Sofi Oksanen and translations in more than half a dozen languages ​​by Aleksi Barrière, “Innocence” is set in Helsinki 21st. The plot alternates between a memory of the disaster by six students and a teacher who went through it , and a wedding reception that takes place 10 years later.

It quickly becomes clear that the two events are related. The bridegroom is the brother of the Sagittarius, and his family, ostracized and desperate about what happened, withheld the whole thing from the bride. (If that wasn’t enough, there’s a reason a waitress crept around the edge of the wedding with clenched jaws: She’s the mother of one of the victims.)

For an innocent young woman who is blindly led by her lover into a world of violence and deception, there are plenty of role models in opera: think of Bartok’s “Bluebeard’s Castle” and Debussy’s “Pelléas et Mélisande”. In its relatively modest, non-stop length, “Innocence” is reminiscent of this as well as the cruel economy of Berg’s “Wozzeck” and Strauss’s “Elektra”.

But “Innocence” is a large part of our time and – in its play with several languages ​​and speaking and song registers – very much itself. Saariaho gave it the working title “Fresco”; It was inspired by “The Last Supper”, from which she derived the size of the cast (13 soloists) and the wider guilt questions of the piece and the related but separate experiences of people who shared a trauma.

Members of the wedding party sing: the groom, a tenor, in loud admonitions; the bride, a soprano, with sweet lyrics. A priest, the family’s only friend, mumbles ominously about his lost faith.

The surviving students and teachers, on the other hand, speak – but in precise rhythms that are artfully coordinated with their respective languages ​​Czech, Swedish, French, German, Spanish, Greek and English. The waitress’s daughter, Marketa (a memorably rapt Vilma Jaa), appears as a kind of phantom and sings in the incredibly simple style of Finnish folk music. The Estonian Philharmonic Chamber Choir sings backstage, a touch of a world beyond the feverish hustle and bustle of the action. All these disparate vocal worlds are connected by the orchestra, which wraps itself easily and smoothly around the singers – never underlining them explicitly, never competing.

The cast matches Saariaho’s score in their dedication and discipline, their refusal to lapse into dubbing or grand guignol. As a waitress, Magdalena Kozena is a laser beam of pain; As the groom’s mother, Sandrine Piau conjures up the eerie effect of a voice thinned to a thread from suffering.

Saariaho’s previous operas – beginning with the stylized medieval parable “L’Amour de Loin” (2000) – were mostly collaborations with the director Peter Sellars, who even gives canonical works the abstraction of ritual. Here, however, she benefits from a hypernaturalistic staging by Simon Stone, whose style “Innocence” anchors in reality without losing its surreal fluidity. (Chloe Lamford’s rotating, ever-changing two-story set, a terrifying mix of school and restaurant, is a key player in the drama.)

The story unfolds with the crushing inevitability – and disgusting surprises – of ancient Greek drama. Different feelings of guilt slowly seep out from the Sagittarius to encompass even seemingly impeccable characters. A weapon was accidentally provided; suspicious behavior was not reported; a boy was mercilessly bullied and attacked.

This is not an unknown plot, and like any great opera, “Innocence” would appear flat if its text were delivered as a play. It is thanks to the music that it has brooding nuances instead; the varieties of utterance; Saariaho’s suggestion, though it gives a clear story, that there is much more than what is being said. The opera here is still a home for emotions that can seem flat, implausible, extreme, but are now mysterious and natural.

“Innocence” also gains depth from the politics and history from which it emerged. When you watch events of this kind happen in and around an international school during this period, it is difficult not to think of Europe itself and its formation as a Union in the wake of unspeakable violence. There was a dream that trauma would prove unifying; we have gradually come to realize that the opposite is the case. In the transition from earlier times – mother tongues and folk songs – to the lingua franca of English and musical modernity, this stage company seems to have gained little. Certainly not the ability to fully integrate new members, to function.

But the last moments of the opera are not without a certain hopeless hope. Students describe small steps they took to overcome tragedy; the daughter’s vision prompts the waitress not to buy her birthday presents anymore, to let them go. The music simmers sadly, but the dissonance runs through a sublime moment of consonance – around the sunshine – before it drifts back into tension and then fades up into pure shimmer, almost tonelessly. So it is through both the music and beyond the music that Saariaho comes to an end that, if not happy, is oddly completely exhilarating.

innocence

Until July 12th at the Festival of Aix-en-Provence, France; and livestream on arte.tv July 10th; festival-aix.com.

Categories
Entertainment

Evaluation: Jacob’s Pillow Is Again, With a Tapping Tour of the Grounds

BECKET, Massachusetts – For the past year and a half, the Jacob’s Pillow Dance Festival has faced bigger challenges than the weather. Last summer, for the first time in its 88-year history, the festival had to cancel all performances in its idyllic home here in the Berkshires. Last November, when the pandemic was still raging, one of the festival’s two theaters was destroyed in a fire.

Jacob’s Pillow has recovered and has a full summer season of performances planned, both on-site and online. But the pandemic isn’t over yet, so all on-site shows are outdoors and subject to Covid protocols and weather. On Wednesday, the opening day, the main obstacle was the rain.

The festival hired a meteorologist to call a few hours before the show. The matinee took place on Wednesday, but the evening performance was not. That means I’ve only seen one of the two programs Dorrance Dance – the leading tap company for the past decade and a regular pillow type – has been preparing to kick off the season.

It was a happy reintroduction, especially since the matinee program is a kind of theme park tour of the grounds. (The video of this will be available for free on the festival website from July 15-29.) Spectators will be divided into small groups, marked with colored armbands, and each group will be guided by instructors to a series of stations, on which members of Dorrance Dance perform vignettes on a loop.

In the open-air pub we meet Aaron Marcellus, Claudia Rahardjanoto and Luke Hickey, who after the last call pretend they are squeezing in another jam session. Marcellus is a singer, a soulful and talented one, but at some point he also contributes a bit of tap. Hickey replaces him on the piano and Rahardjanoto, who plays bass, joins him in a tap-and-song duet. This circular trade is characteristic of Dorrance Dance and the playful, welcoming, and improvised spirit that makes the company a smart choice to welcome audiences back in.

The next piece in the Tea Garden shows a different side. In what looks like beekeeping suits, Warren Craft and Rena Kinoshita are tinkering with electronics and antennas and turning the faucet into an esoteric attempt at communication over potentially interstellar distances – or something like that. Is it the latest report on UFOs?

The science fiction theme is picked up later when we meet Michelle Dorrance, Leonardo Sandoval and Byron Tittle in overalls setting up a ladder and satellite dish. Nearby, chairs are arranged around a gravel pit, in which the three dancers with shovels and boots work out a small symphony in rhythm, paying attention to the tonal possibilities of the gravel: crunching, scratching, rattling.

Before that we visited Ephrat Asherie and Matthew West in the woods and performed a sad dance of separation to greyhounds. And we’ve spied on Josette Wiggan’s friend in a secluded and rustic cabin, hanging up the laundry to dry as she moves to Sarah Vaughan’s records in the heat and comes amazingly close to a dance equivalent of Vaughan’s voice. We end up finding the rest of the company (including the stellar trumpeter Keyon Harrold in a guest appearance) around more booths, pounding on washtubs and washboards, and having a great old time.

Where are we? When are we These vignettes have something to replace, something that is far too reminiscent of theme parks in backyards. The well-known scenarios also miss an opportunity, because the pillow has its own rich history of architecture and location. (Could the hut dances allude to the history of the place as a subway station?) The camp setups reinforce the feeling of thinness. As soon as the last party starts and we are set up to participate, we will be led away. The journey is over.

In these circumstances these mistakes are forgivable. Dorrance Dance offers a pleasant tour. Had I seen the other program with two new works for the festival’s open-air stage, the matinee might have seemed like the perfect starter. But the evening show on Thursday was also rainy and I had to go back to Brooklyn.

Fortunately, part of the program I missed – a premiere by Wiggan’s friend to music by Harrold – will be on July 9th and 10th at the Queens Theater in Flushing Meadows Corona Park. These shows are also held outdoors (but with an indoor backup plan, if it rains). I watch the weather.

Dorrance dance

See you Sunday at Jacob’s Pillow, Becket, Mass .; jacobspillow.org.

Categories
Entertainment

‘No. 7 Cherry Lane’ Overview: A Heady Daydream in 1967 Hong Kong

As sumptuous as it is odd, “No. 7 Cherry Lane” is an exercise in harnessing nostalgia for innovation. The first animated film from the director Yonfan is a deeply eccentric chronicle of a forbidden affair in 1960s Hong Kong, as the spirit of Mao Zedong’s anti-imperialist, communist revolution arrives in what was still a British colony. Fan Ziming, a beguiling English literature student, becomes embroiled in a knotty love triangle between Mrs. Yu, a divorced Taiwanese exile and former revolutionary who now deals in luxury goods, and her daughter Meiling, a nubile 18-year-old student taking English lessons from Ziming.

At times, “No. 7 Cherry Lane” unfolds as a hallucinatory daydream, flowing with starry-eyed voice-over narration: “Look how the golden years flowed away,” reads the opening title card, as the narrator describes the time as an “era of prosperity amidst simplicity.” The Hong Kong of 1967 is rendered in rich detail through pencil on rice paper, with radiant color blooming onscreen, illustrations of bustling streets and movie theaters constituting the film’s universe. There are cerebral, erudite dialogues about Proust, French art films and classic Chinese literature that drive the liaisons at its center. The animation is often slow-moving — figures shuffle stiffly across the screen as they muse about art and philosophy, a choice that may challenge viewers accustomed to more fluid gestures. But the approach contributes to the film’s thematic commitment to nostalgia and adds a quiet elegance and slow-paced intimacy to each scene.

Fortunately, “No. 7 Cherry Lane” transcends pure wistfulness or intellectual indulgence. The film embraces a lovely surreal sensibility that bleeds through all of its details: puffs of smoke wafting off a theater screen into the characters’ world; a clowder of cats explaining Hong Kong’s floor-numbering practices; effervescent, jarring synth pop soundtracking the peak of a violent protest. These details seem minor, but they infuse an otherwise heady film with heart and levity. The movie’s bizarre and sexually explicit dream sequences, which include the abduction of a Taoist nun and Ziming being pleasured by a cat, further illustrate the film’s enigmatic quality — but they also prevent it from becoming a simple trip down memory lane. Consider this film a master class in world-building, a bewildering but poignant dream — one that will leave you with plenty of burning questions.

No. 7 Cherry Lane
Not rated. In Mandarin, Cantonese, French and Shanghainese, with subtitles. Running time: 2 hours 5 minutes. Watch on Criterion Channel.

Categories
Entertainment

‘God Exists, Her Identify Is Petrunya’ Evaluate: Her Cross to Bear

In another world, the rebellious title character from “God Exists, Her Name Is Petrunya” could have been a satisfied free spirit in a John Waters film. But Petrunya lives in the conservative town of Stip in Macedonia and seems to be stalled by patriarchal rules and maternal interference. That begins to change when she crashes an all-male Orthodox ceremony – every year a priest throws a cross into a river and men try to grab it – and accepts the award.

Many city dwellers have a stip attack over Petrunya’s performance, and at the behest of indignant priests, the police pursue and arrest them. Petrunya (Zorica Nusheva, with flashing frustration on the verge of escapades) confronts the situation by defying intimidation and condescension. It wasn’t always like this: she starts the film firmly in bed, an unemployed historian around 30 who lives with her mother.

The director Teona Strugar Mitevska takes up current events for this cheerful occupation and resistance story. The independent streak was clearly present in Petrunya: we saw her fend off a shabby boss of a clothing factory and walk away with a mannequin that she lugged around, which felt like a natural punk. Mitevska and camerawoman Virginie Saint Martin give Petrunya’s outside world even more unusual flair and eye-catching patterns.

But the stalemate with the authorities dawdles and languishes, and a side plot with a TV journalist (Labina Mitevska) feels unanimous. Still, we should all be excited to see what Petrunya will do next.

God exists, her name is Petrunya
Not rated. In Macedonian, with subtitles. Running time: 1 hour 40 minutes. In theaters and virtual cinemas.