Categories
Politics

anti-Taliban resistance vows to carry out in Panjshir valley

Taliban members are patrolling after entering the Panjshir Valley, the only province the group failed to capture during its raid in Afghanistan on September 6, 2021 last month.

Sayed Khodaiberdi Sadat | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

The status of the Panjshir Valley in eastern Afghanistan remained unclear on Tuesday after the Taliban declared that the militants had captured the country’s last blocked province, despite Taliban resistance fighters vowing to continue fighting.

If the claims to victory are true, it means that all of Afghanistan is now under the control of the Taliban, who in July and early August, through a series of staggering battlefield wins and Afghan military surrenders, took the country of nearly 40 million people when the US withdrew its troops.

It would also mark an unprecedented and deeply symbolic defeat for a province known for its previously undefeated fighters who successfully withstood both Taliban and Soviet invasions and were important allies of the United States over the past few decades

The fighting continued late Tuesday, according to a member of the National Resistance Front speaking to CNBC from Panjshir on condition of anonymity due to security risks. The NRF is a multi-ethnic group of tribes, militias and the Afghan military who oppose the Taliban.

The Afghan resistance movement and anti-Taliban uprisings are taking part in military training in the Abdullah Khil area of ​​Dara district in Panjshir province on August 24, 2021.

Ahmad Sahel Arman | AFP | Getty Images

Although the Taliban invaded the historically important valley, there is no evidence that they took control of it, says Kamal Alam, a non-resident senior fellow of the Atlantic Council who was at Panjshir just last month.

“The Taliban have claimed they have taken Panjshir before without evidence. This time one thing is clear: you have definitely entered Panjshir, ”Alam told CNBC on Tuesday. “Taking it whole is another thing that has yet to be proven. You have only taken parts of it at a minimal level so far, that’s for sure.”

First the Soviets, then the Taliban: a legacy of resistance

Alam is senior advisor to the Massoud Foundation, an organization promoting the legacy of Ahmad Shah Massoud, the anti-Taliban resistance leader who was murdered days before the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Massoud’s son Ahmad is the leader of the National Resistance Front. He is also CEO of the Massoud Foundation.

In a prepared statement posted on social media on Monday, Ahmad Massoud pledged to keep fighting, trying to convince others to do the same: “In no way will military pressure on us and our territory diminish our resolve, our struggle continue, ”he said.

“Wherever you are … we appeal to you to stand up in resistance for the dignity, integrity and freedom of our country. We, the NRF, will stand by your side.”

Afghan men wave to negotiate on the 23rd instead of taking the fight away from them.

Ahmad Sahel Arman | AFP | Getty Images

Mountainous Panjshir was a cave of anti-Soviet resistance in the 1980s and later remained as one of the few parts of Afghanistan that the Taliban could not take.

This resistance was led almost entirely by Ahmad Shah Massoud, who came to be known as the “Lion of Panjshir”. Ahmad Shah Massoud worked with CIA paramilitary forces in the 1990s to mobilize and train local tribes to fight the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Now Ahmad’s son Shah Massoud, 32-year-old Sandhurst Military Academy and King’s College London-trained Ahmad, has pledged to carry on his father’s legacy and to resist the Taliban.

Ahmad Massoud, son of the murdered anti-Soviet resistance hero Ahmad Shah Massoud, waves when he is on May 5.

Facebook Facebook logo Sign up on Facebook to connect with Mohammad Ismail Reuters

Ahmad Massoud has criticized the Taliban for failing to comply with a resolution by the Afghan Ulema Council or high-ranking religious scholars calling for a cessation of hostilities. The NRF supported the dissolution.

“We considered it final and inviolable and waited for the other side’s response. But the Taliban revealed their true nature by rejecting the resolution’s demand,” said Ahmad Massoud with their continued offensive in the Panjshir.

Taliban victory would be “great psychological defeat”

The implications and significance of losing the Panjshir to the Taliban would be enormous, Alam said. “Not just for Afghanistan, but for the whole world – 9/11, the end of the Cold War and the folklore of the guerrilla war collide in Panjshir.”

Over the past two and a half decades, “every attempt to invade the northeast has been defeated by the Taliban, not just Panjshir,” Alam said. “However, it will be an enormous psychological and tactical defeat if God were to forbid Panjshir now, with a strategic change also for the future of Central Asia.”

Emily Winterbotham, director of the Terrorism and Conflict Group at the Royal United Services Institute in London, shared this opinion.

“If the Taliban’s victory over the small province of Panjshir is confirmed, it will be deeply symbolic,” said Winterbotham. “It ends, at least for the time being, the last resistance against the Taliban, an achievement that the regime did not achieve for the first time in the 1990s.”

It would also show how much stronger the Taliban are compared to 20 years ago. The Taliban have not only grown in size and support or acceptance in parts of the country; they also now have billions of dollars’ worth of US weapons and two decades of experience fighting Western military forces.

While the Taliban have stated that they want to build a more inclusive and forgiving leadership than in the past, the behavior of their militants in recent weeks tells a different story. Taliban members killed and beaten civilians, including demonstrators, including women and children.

“There is growing concern that the Taliban will harshly retaliate for resistance against the Taliban,” said Winterbotham. “How the Taliban react is an indicator of how much the group has actually changed.”

Categories
Politics

Biden’s China Technique Meets Resistance on the Negotiating Desk

In an effort to maintain an increasingly strained relationship, the Biden government has developed a strategy to confront China on disputes while leaving the door open to cooperation against global threats.

On Monday, China appeared to slam the door on the idea that the two countries could work together in one day and clash the next.

Talks with Assistant Secretary of State Wendy R. Sherman – the highest-ranking government official to visit China – began with a spate of public criticism from the Chinese side and ended with little evidence that the two powers were closer to narrowing their differences.

“The relationship between the United States and the PRC is complex, so our policies are very complex,” Sherman said in a telephone interview following the meetings on the People’s Republic of China. “We believe our relationship can tolerate this nuance.”

The meetings, held in northeast China’s Tianjin city, covered the range of disputes between the two countries, she said. Many of them are bitter and defy a simple solution.

These included human rights, the rapid curtailment of political freedoms in Hong Kong, and what Ms. Sherman called “the horrific acts in Xinjiang,” the largely Muslim region of western China where hundreds of thousands of detention and re-education centers passed.

Ms. Sherman also raised China’s demands over Taiwan, its military operations in the South China Sea, and allegations by the United States and other nations last week that China’s Department of State Security was behind the hacking of Microsoft email systems and possibly other cyber attacks.

“This is very serious – that the Department of State Security would help criminals hack Microsoft and possibly others,” she said, adding that many countries had joined the United States, saying that “such behavior is absolutely irresponsible, reckless and totally irresponsible is out of place ”. in our world. “

China gave no reason, at least publicly, saying that the United States had no right to lecture the Chinese government or anyone else. Before Ms. Sherman finished their meetings, the State Department released a series of six harsh statements from the first official she met, Xie Feng, the assistant secretary of state overseeing relations with the United States.

Mr Xie accused the United States of committing Native American genocide and botching the response to the coronavirus pandemic that killed 620,000 Americans.

The Biden government’s policy is nothing more than a “thinly veiled attempt to contain and suppress China,” Xie told Ms. Sherman, according to a summary of his comments the Chinese State Department sent reporters on Monday before the Americans could show up provide your own account.

“It appears that a nationwide and societal campaign is being waged to bring China down,” Xie told Ms. Sherman, according to the summaries of his comments, which were also posted on the ministry’s overseas website.

Updated

July 26, 2021, 9:15 a.m. ET

Ms. Sherman’s meetings provided the latest measure of how the Biden administration’s strategy is working. At least so far, it has done little to mitigate China’s behavior. Mr. Xie’s remarks underscored the anger that has been building in China towards the United States and undermines the chances that the approach will gain ground.

After a second meeting with China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi, Ms. Sherman pointed out that the two sides had discussed global and regional issues on which the two governments could potentially work together, including North Korea and the proliferation of nuclear weapons. However, she warned of concrete progress, adding that she did not come to the talks with immediate results.

“We were pretty straight forward with each other in the areas of big differences,” she said.

“In areas where we have common interests and there are major global interests, we have had very substantial discussions and exchanged some ideas,” said Sherman. “We’ll have to see where this leads.”

Drew Thompson, a former director of China for the US Department of Defense, said the underlying intent behind Ms. Sherman’s visit appears to be to ensure that the worsening of differences does not lead to dangerous stalemates.

“Beijing is taking a maximalist approach to US-China relations, issuing lists of demands, insisting that Washington adopt reverse policies and actions,” said Thompson, now a researcher at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy the National University is from Singapore.

“The main goal for Washington is to deepen understanding of China’s positions, reduce the potential for misjudgment and avoid misjudgment that could lead to open conflict,” he said.

The tone on Monday reflected the opening of high-level talks between senior Chinese and Biden government officials in March when Beijing’s senior foreign policy leader Yang Jiechi gave a 16-minute talk accusing Americans of arrogance and hypocrisy. The controversial start with the Biden administration caught officials in China by surprise, who thought relations hit rock bottom in the last year of the Trump presidency and therefore could only get better with the new president.

Mr. Xie told the Chinese news media after meeting that he had forwarded two requests to Ms. Sherman, including lifting the visa restrictions on Communist Party members, lifting sanctions against Chinese officials and shutting down major Chinese news agencies in the United States as foreign agents. All of these were introduced during Donald J. Trump’s presidency, but President Biden did nothing to repeal any of them.

While Mr Biden has largely avoided it the heated ideological sparring with the Chinese Communist Party that the Trump administration led in its final year, relations remain strained.

Washington has sought allies to pressure Beijing on many of these issues. Ms. Sherman’s trip also took her to Japan, South Korea and Mongolia to rebuild regional ties that were strained under Mr. Trump.

And the Chinese government has resented calls by the United States, the World Health Organization and others for a new investigation into whether the coronavirus might have hatched from a laboratory in China and set off the pandemic.

Last week, Chinese officials said they were “extremely shocked” at a WHO proposal to reconsider laboratory leak theory. A report in March of a first WHO investigation said it was “extremely unlikely” that the coronavirus jumped into the wider population after escaping from a laboratory.

Ms. Sherman said she has urged China to cooperate in the international investigation into the spread of Covid. “I’ll let them speak for themselves,” she said, “but from my point of view I certainly didn’t get the answer I wanted or hoped for.”

China’s belligerent tone seems to flow from above. The country’s head of state, Xi Jinping, has signaled a growing impatience with criticism and demands from Washington, particularly with regard to Beijing’s internal problems such as Hong Kong and Xinjiang.

Beijing has fought against sanctions against Hong Kong and Xinjiang with its own against Western politicians, human rights groups and academics.

“We will never accept excruciatingly arrogant lectures from these ‘master teachers’!” Mr. Xi said in a speech on July 1 to commemorate 100 years since the Chinese Communist Party was founded.

Keith Bradsher contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Invoice to Change How Navy Prosecutes Felonies Faces Resistance

WASHINGTON – After years of opposition from Pentagon leaders, New York Democrat Senator Kirsten Gillibrand appeared to be nearing victory over a fundamental change in the way the military handles sexual assault cases. However, their emphasis on including all serious crimes in the measure for reasons of racial justice now threatens to weaken their support.

Ms. Gillibrand’s push to remove commanders from decisions in prosecuting sexual assault cases had received bipartisan support despite opposition from military leaders. Last month, President Biden and Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III endorsed a similar change recommended by an independent military body.

But Mr. Austin and some of Mrs. Gillibrand’s strongest allies in Congress on this issue are reluctant to make broader changes to the military justice system. Some lawmakers say they only recently focused on the details of the measure after months of discussion.

“Your bill is much broader than I thought,” said Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine and an early proponent of Ms. Gillibrand’s move. “I believe she has made a compelling case for sexual assault and related allegations to be removed from the chain of command.”

But Ms. Collins said she didn’t think there was any justification for removing other alleged crimes from the military justice system.

Ms. Gillibrand’s bill would overturn the decision to prosecute serious crimes such as sexual assault and other crimes such as murder from military commanders to military prosecutors. The Pentagon panel proposed a more limited change: that a special victim unit should be set up within the military for cases of sexual assault and some other crimes.

But Ms. Gillibrand argues that this would create an unequal system and has said that her proposal would also help fight racial injustice.

A bill that would cover most crimes is “necessary,” she said in the Senate on Tuesday, “because the current military justice system simply does not provide justice, especially for soldiers of color.”

This tactic has helped attract other voices to their cause.

“Racial and gender bias in the military has resulted in inadequate prosecution of sexual assault cases and excessive prosecution of black and brown officers,” said Anthony Brown, Rep. Anthony Brown, Democrat of Maryland, a veteran and former Army Attorney General an interview this week.

While there have been differences in prosecution in the military over time, he said, “I think after the tragic murder of George Floyd, it really got a lot of us to say, ‘Hey, this is a real opportunity here, this one Fix inequalities and differences. ‘“

Studies over the years have identified racial differences in the military justice system, including the way in which discipline is exercised.

The tensions over Ms. Gillibrand’s move and the closer changes recommended by the Military Commission are potentially difficult terrain for Mr. Austin. He said strengthening the fight against sexual assault, racism and extremism in the ranks is a top priority.

Many military leaders who oppose changes in sexual assault cases may also oppose the loss of other prosecutorial powers. But focusing on other crimes could also alienate some of Ms. Gillibrand’s supporters – many of whom were brought back after years of courting.

“My inclination now is to commit sexual assault,” said Senator Angus King, Maine Independent, after previously saying he would register with Ms. Gillibrand. “That has been the goal of our work for eight years.”

Among the 70 or so senators from both parties who joined this spring, Ms. Gillibrand still seems to enjoy support. Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican from Texas, has been with their side for years, while some Democrats, like Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia, recently joined their efforts.

“There are many reasons to professionalize crime-dealing,” said Kaine, who previously worked as a lawyer. “Kirsten has a bright line that was maybe a little different from the one she drew earlier. But it’s a line that makes sense for us lawyers. “

Republican Senator Josh Hawley from Missouri agreed. “As a lawyer and former prosecutor, I think there is some value in having continuity and saying that every crime is handled the same way no matter what it is. I like that as a former prosecutor and I like it as a defense attorney. For me it’s a plus. “

Both men said they support the bill in writing but welcome further debate on the proposed changes that would require a Congressional resolution.

Senator Jack Reed, Democrat of Rhode Island and chairman of the Senate Armed Forces Committee, now supports changing the prosecution for sexual assault after years of opposition. But he is a leading voice against extending this trial to other crimes.

Data on racial differences is mixed and sometimes inconclusive, in large part due to the military’s lack of consistent data on race and the justice system, several reports say.

A recent report by the Government Accountability Office found that black and Hispanic military personnel were more likely than whites to be tried in a military trial, but that race “was not a statistically significant factor in conviction.”

A report by the Air Force Inspector General last year found that black service members were 1.64 times more likely to be suspicious in Office of Special Investigations criminal cases, but said that “identifying racial differences does not automatically imply racial bias or racism available”. . “

Categories
Politics

Democrats’ Supreme Court docket Growth Plan Attracts Resistance

The proponents of the bill hope to generate more support for a possible overhaul.

Representative Jerrold Nadler, Democrat of New York and chairman of the Justice Committee, said it made sense to enlarge the court given its complex workload and the growth of the federal judicial system since the composition of the Supreme Court last changed in 1869, no the Constitution, and it was amended several times in the nation’s early days.

“Nine judges in the 19th century, when there were only nine cycles, and many of our most important federal laws may have made sense – from civil rights to antitrust, internet, financial regulation, health care, immigration to employee crime – just didn’t exist and didn’t require a decision by the Supreme Court, ”said Nadler, another sponsor of the bill. “But the logic behind only nine judges is much weaker today when there are 13 circuits.”

Republicans immediately attacked the idea, and Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, called it a “crazy” bill and found that even liberal members of the court opposed the idea.

“By the way, the public agrees,” he said in the Senate. “You see through this discredited concept.”

Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican from South Carolina and senior judicial committee member, called it a “terrible idea”.

“If this succeeds, it will inevitably result in the number of Supreme Court justices changing every time power shifts,” he said.

Republican politicians were quick to criticize the proposal to expand the court, which also appeared in the Senate in 2020, signaling that the party would try to use the issue to portray Democrats as radical even if the legislation fails.

Categories
Politics

The ‘Resistance’ Fashioned Due to Trump, With an Help From Jon Ossoff

In Georgia, the organizations formed during the Trump administration say they are now looking to the future: a new Republican legislature, measures to restrict electoral access, municipal competitions in 2021, and the expected rematch between Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, and wife Dr. Abrams in 2022.

Tamara Stevens, who helped found the progressive grassroots organization No Safe Seats, said her group planned to expand beyond election victories to include social justice initiatives such as “nice white ladies” seminars to learn more about white To experience privilege and what it means to raise marginalized voices.

When Ms. Stevens, 50, pondered her experience of Mr. Ossoff’s first campaign, she said she was ashamed of how little she understood about color communities, even when trying to reach out to her constituents.

“White women didn’t come in here with our pink pussy hats and our rally signs and saved the day – not at all,” said Ms. Stevens, who runs a construction company with her husband. “We have the amazing Stacey Abrams and so many other black women who have been such role models and have taught some of us who are just getting into politics.”

Ms. Snow-Murphy, now the executive director of a local organization focused on keeping the sixth district in democratic hands, recently presented Mr. Ossoff with a present: a hammock that reads “Thank you for building the base camp”.

The present was intended to underline how much Mr Ossoff’s campaign had contributed to building the democratic infrastructure that turned Georgia around. But it also talked about what had changed for her and her fellow activists in the suburbs – a hammock, a backyard leisure accessory presented to the man they said had changed their own free time. Or rather, who has seriously cut into it.

Since then, instead of brunch, people have been promoting postcards instead of just hanging out.

“It’s become a lifestyle,” said Ms. Snow-Murphy.