Categories
Business

Biden Particulars $2 Trillion Plan to Rebuild Infrastructure and Reshape the Financial system

WASHINGTON – President Biden will unveil an infrastructure plan on Wednesday the cost of $ 2 trillion would result in 20,000 miles of rebuilt roads, repairs to the country’s 10 economically most important bridges, the removal of lead pipes and utilities from the country’s water supply, and one Long list of other projects designed to create millions of jobs in the short term and strengthen American competitiveness in the long term.

Biden government officials said the proposal, which they set out in a 25-page briefing paper, and which Mr Biden will discuss in an afternoon speech in Pittsburgh, will also accelerate the fight against climate change by accelerating the transition to new, cleaner sources of energy . and would help promote racial justice in the economy.

Spending in the plan would be over eight years, officials said. In contrast to the economic stimulus passed under President Barack Obama in 2009 when Mr Biden was Vice President, officials will not always prioritize so-called shovel-ready projects that could support growth quickly.

But even over the years, the scope of the proposal underscores how fully Mr Biden took the opportunity to use federal spending to address longstanding social and economic challenges in ways that have not been seen in half a century. Officials said that if approved, the spending on schedule would end decades of stagnation in federal investment in research and infrastructure and bring government investment in these areas back to its highest level since the 1960s as part of the economy.

The proposal is the first half of a two-stage publication of the president’s ambitious agenda to overhaul the economy and reshape American capitalism, which could cost up to $ 4 trillion in total over a decade. Mr. Biden’s administration has named it the American Jobs Plan, which mirrors the $ 1.9 trillion pandemic relief bill signed by Mr. Biden earlier this month, the American Rescue Plan.

“The American employment plan,” White House officials wrote in the document detailing it, “will invest in America in ways we have not invested in America since we built the highways and won the space race.”

While spending on roads, bridges, and other physical improvements to the country’s economic foundations has always had bipartisan appeal, Biden’s plan is sure to generate stiff opposition from Republicans, both for its size and for its reliance on corporate tax hikes to pay for it.

Administration officials said the tax hikes in the plan – including an increase in the corporate tax rate and a series of measures to tax multinationals on money they earn and book overseas – would take 15 years to fully offset the cost of the spending programs.

The plan’s expenses cover a wide range of physical infrastructure projects, including transportation, broadband, power grid, and housing. Efforts to stimulate advanced manufacturing; and other industry representatives see this as key to the United States’ growing economic competition with China. It also includes funding to train millions of workers, as well as funding initiatives to support unions and home care providers for elderly and disabled Americans, while increasing the pay of workers who provide that care.

Many of the items in the plan carry price tags that would have filled whole, ambitious bills in previous administrations.

Including: a total of $ 180 billion for research and development, $ 115 billion for roads and bridges, $ 85 billion for public transportation and $ 80 billion for Amtrak and rail freight. There’s $ 42 billion for ports and airports, $ 100 billion for broadband, and $ 111 billion for water infrastructure – including $ 45 billion to make sure no child is ever forced to use water from a lead pipe drink, which can slow children’s development and lead to behavioral and other problems.

The plan is to repair 10,000 smaller bridges across the country, along with the 10 most economically significant ones that need to be repaired. It would electrify 20 percent of the country’s fleet of yellow school buses. It would spend $ 300 billion to promote advanced manufacturing, including a four-year plan to replenish the country’s strategic national supply of medicines, including vaccines, in preparation for future pandemics.

In many cases, officials formulated these goals in the language of closing racial gaps in the economy, sometimes the result of previous federal spending efforts, such as highway developments that divided paint or air pollution communities, Black and Hispanic communities near ports or in power concern plants.

Officials gave the $ 400 billion for home care in part as ointment for “underpaid and undervalued” workers in the industry, who are disproportionately colored women.

Mr Biden’s promise to tackle climate change is embedded throughout the plan. Roads, bridges, and airports would be more resilient to the effects of extreme storms, floods, and fires caused by a warming planet. Research and development spending could help make breakthroughs in the latest clean technology, while plans to retrofit and weather millions of buildings would make them more energy efficient.

However, the president’s focus on climate change is on modernizing and reshaping the two largest sources of planetary greenhouse gas pollution in the United States: automobiles and power plants.

A decade ago, Obama’s stimulus program spent around $ 90 billion on clean energy programs designed to boost the country’s emerging renewable energy and electric vehicle industries. Mr. Biden’s plan is now to spend more money on similar programs that he hopes will fully incorporate these technologies into the mainstream.

It relies heavily on spending to increase the use of electric cars, which today only make up 2 percent of vehicles on American highways.

The plan is to spend $ 174 billion to boost electric vehicle manufacturing and buying by granting tax credits and other incentives to companies that make electric vehicle batteries in the U.S. instead of China. The aim is to lower vehicle prices.

The money would also fund the construction of roughly half a million electric vehicle charging stations – although experts say that number is only a tiny fraction of what it takes to make electric vehicles a common option.

Mr. Biden’s plan includes $ 100 billion in programs to upgrade and modernize the power grid to make it more reliable and less prone to power outages such as those recently devastated in Texas, while also adding more transmission lines from wind and solar plants to build big cities.

It proposes the creation of a “Clean Electricity Standard” – essentially a federal mandate that requires a certain percentage of electricity in the US to be generated from low-carbon energy sources such as wind, solar and possibly nuclear. However, this mandate would have to be passed by Congress, where the prospects for its success remain bleak. Similar efforts to pass such a mandate have failed several times over the past 20 years.

The plan provides an additional $ 46 billion in federal procurement programs for government agencies to purchase fleets of electric vehicles and $ 35 billion in research and development programs for cutting-edge new technologies.

There are also calls for infrastructure and communities to be better prepared for the worsening effects of climate change, although the administration has so far provided few details on how to deliver this goal.

However, according to the document released by the White House, the plan includes $ 50 billion for “earmarked investments to improve infrastructure resilience.” Efforts would defend against forest fires, rising seas, and hurricanes, and there would be a focus on investments that protect low-income residents and people of color.

The plan also includes a $ 16 billion program to help fossil fuel workers transition to new jobs – such as limiting leaks from abandoned oil wells and closing retired coal mines – and $ 10 billion for a new ” Civilian Climate Corps ”.

Mr Biden would fund his expenses in part by removing tax preferences for fossil fuel producers. But the bulk of its tax hikes would come from businesses in general.

It would raise the corporate tax rate from 21 percent to 28 percent, partially reversing a cut signed by President Donald J. Trump. Mr Biden would also take several steps to raise taxes on multinational corporations. Many of them work as part of a revision of the taxation of foreign profits that was incorporated into Mr. Trump’s tax law in 2017.

These measures would include raising the minimum tax rate on global profits and removing several provisions that allow companies to reduce their US tax liability on profits they earn and post overseas.

Mr. Biden would also introduce a new minimum tax on the global income of the largest multinationals, and heighten the Internal Revenue Service’s enforcement efforts against large corporations that are tax evading.

Administrative officials this week expressed hope that the plan could find bipartisan support in Congress. But Republicans and corporate groups have already attacked Mr. Biden’s plans to raise corporate taxes to finance the spending, which they believe will hurt the competitiveness of American businesses. Administration officials say the moves will push companies to keep profits and jobs in the United States.

Joshua Bolten, the president and executive director of the Business Roundtable, a powerful group representing top executives in Washington, said Tuesday that his group “firmly opposes corporate tax increases as payment for infrastructure investments.”

“Policymakers should avoid creating new barriers to job creation and economic growth,” said Bolten, “especially during the upswing.”

Coral Davenport and Christopher Flavelle contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Business

Mexico Set to Reshape Energy Sector to Favor the State

MEXICO CITY – President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has never lacked criticism of his predecessor’s legacy. But he reserved a particular disdain for the major overhaul that opened Mexico’s strained energy industry to the private sector.

He has called the changes a form of legalized “looting,” the product of corruption and resounding failure. He has suggested that some foreign energy investors are “looting” the nation and that Mexican lawyers who work for them are guilty of treason.

He is now formalizing his most aggressive attack on the measures to date.

A bill is expected to be passed in the next few days to strengthen the dominance of the Mexican state-owned electricity company. The measure, recently approved by the Mexican Congress with the firm support of Mr López Obrador, would also limit the participation of private investors in the energy sector. Both effects are of central importance for his long-term goal of restoring energy self-sufficiency and securing Mexican sovereignty.

Mexico’s reliance on foreign hydrocarbons was highlighted last month when a winter storm in Texas disrupted supplies of natural gas from the United States, the source of most of the natural gas used in Mexico. Mr López Obrador pointed to the resulting blackouts as evidence of the need to reduce dependence on foreign energy.

However, the legislation, hastened by the Mexican Congress by Mr López Obrador’s party, has been criticized by opposition lawmakers, environmentalists, industry analysts, Mexican and international corporate groups, and even Mexico’s antitrust watchdog almost everywhere.

Many critics see the bill as a political move to excite the president’s grassroots ahead of the June midterm elections, through which Mr López Obrador hopes to turn his party’s congressional majority into the super-majority required to amend the constitution.

Opponents of the legislation say that not only would it not revitalize the energy sector or help achieve energy independence, it would violate Mexico’s international commitments to reduce carbon emissions, violate trade deals, and further cool foreign investment in Mexico struggles to regain economic dynamism amid the pandemic.

Legislation also threatens to re-grasp the relationship between Mr López Obrador’s administrations and President Biden, which got off to a rocky start when the Mexican President became one of the last world leaders to congratulate Mr Biden on his election victory.

“I think the effects of this reform are a big reversal,” said Lourdes Melgar, who was a senior energy official in the administration of Enrique Peña Nieto, the predecessor of Mr López Obrador. The Mexican president, she said, “had a very nationalist view of resource management.”

She added, “He wants to bring private producers to their knees, and we see it in the most absurd way.”

Jeremy M. Martin, vice president of energy and sustainability at the Institute of the Americas, a public order think tank in San Diego, said the legislation is likely to resonate with supporters of Mr López Obrador, who have been made feel like it finally have a president who puts the Mexican people first.

“It doesn’t make economic sense, but it makes a lot of sense for people who feel like they’ve been screwed in Mexico for years,” he said. “It’s pure ideology, it’s political.”

The legislation would rewrite the rules for the electricity sector. Among other things, this would change the so-called shipping rules, which regulate the order in which plants feed their electricity into the national grid, and give higher priority to the plants of the state electricity company, the Federal Electricity Commission.

The energy market liberalization approved by Mexican legislators in 2014 gave priority to low-cost power generation, with increasing preference for solar and wind power plants, which led to an increase in private investments from Mexico and abroad in the renewable energy sector.

However, the new legislation restores preferences for government fossil fuel plants, which generate electricity at higher costs and cause higher CO2 emissions.

Mr López Obrador and his allies have argued that the bill seeks to correct a trend in the 2014 overhaul that gave private companies an unfair advantage.

“We level the ground, we establish clear rules, we prioritize national security,” said Rocío Abreu Artiñano, Senator of the ruling Morena Party and President of the Energy Commission of the Mexican Senate.

The current system, she said, “stifles” the Federal Electricity Commission.

When more than 4.5 million homes and businesses in northern Mexico lost electricity last month after Arctic weather froze cross-border pipelines and the Texas governor issued an order restricting natural gas exports, López Obrador said it was a lesson the need for energy independence.

Gas-fired power plants generate more than half of Mexico’s electricity. According to the Mexican government, the vast majority of natural gas is imported, with the majority coming from the United States.

“We always have to look for self-sufficiency and produce what we consume in Mexico: food, energy,” said López Obrador in mid-February when Mexico was recovering from the blackouts.

However, analysts and industry leaders say that although Mr López Obrador insists on moving Mexico to greater energy independence, the new legislation could actually make the nation more dependent on foreign energy sources by increasing reliance on fossil fuels, which it has to import .

While household energy bills are likely to remain isolated from price increases from government subsidies, industrial users could see an increase in electricity bills that they would likely pass on to their customers, analysts said.

“This has no economic logic,” said Víctor Ramírez Cabrera, spokesman for the Mexico, Climate and Energy Platform, a research group in Mexico City. He called the new model for power sourcing “absurd”.

Environmentalists and other critics have also devastated the legislation, saying it will undo hard-fought gains in cutting carbon emissions and put Mexico on a course that contradicts global efforts to combat climate change and goes against its international treaties and possibly his violates own laws.

Mr López Obrador said the government was planning to upgrade its hydropower plants, which will be given a higher priority under the new energy supply system, to help meet its climate change commitments. However, critics of the legislation are deeply skeptical.

“Under these conditions there is no way to keep the Paris Agreement,” said Ramírez. “Just give it up for dead.”

Equally worrying, critics say, is the negative impact of the legislation on FDI in Mexico. The law would essentially hamper many private renewable energy companies that have invested since the energy sector opened up and cripple their chances of making a profit.

“It’s going to hit them big and hard,” said Gonzalo Monroy, a Mexico City-based energy consultant.

Investors “came to invest in the country, trusting the rules and the law,” said Xóchitl Gálvez Ruiz, senator of the opposition National Action Party. “Overnight they are told, ‘You know what? I don’t like that, I’ll change the rules. ‘”

Analysts and industry experts say litigation against the law is inevitable, including potential challenges on the grounds that doing so may violate clauses in the U.S.-Mexico-Canada deal that replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement.

The legislation is just the latest what analysts say is a string of foreign investment violations by Mr Lopez Obrador, including the cancellation of a $ 13 billion airport project in 2018 and the lockdown of a partially built brewery in northern Mexico last year .

After the Senate approved the new law last week, the peso fell to a four-month low against the dollar. And a Reuters poll found the currency could be unpredictable for a few months, partly due to energy transition concerns.

“Investment levels are falling and nobody wants to invest here,” said Israel Tello, a legal analyst at Integralia, a Mexico City-based advisory group. “Legal uncertainty is the deadliest weapon against investment.”