Categories
Health

Sickle Cell Therapy Not Linked to Most cancers, Researchers Say

Just weeks after promising sickle cell disease gene therapy appeared to hit a roadblock, the outlook for treatment is now looking brighter. Preliminary data suggesting it could cause cancer has not held up.

In gene therapy, scientists insert a normal gene into the patient’s DNA to correct sickle cell disease caused by a devastating mutation. The cutting-edge treatment could prove to be a cure, and a company testing the treatment, Bluebird Bio, was on track to apply for approval from the Food and Drug Administration next year.

However, on February 16, Bluebird Bio announced that a sickle cell patient treated in a clinical trial five years ago had developed acute myeloid leukemia. Another patient developed acute myelodysplastic syndrome, a form of cancer that is often a precursor to leukemia.

The company stopped its studies of sickle cell patients and those with another blood disorder called beta thalassemia while its researchers tried to understand whether gene therapy was flawed.

On Wednesday, Bluebird Bio reported that it had found no evidence that gene therapy caused the sickle cell patient’s leukemia.

The gene inserted into the patient’s DNA did not interfere with the function of other genes, the company said. And the gene wasn’t inserted into the genome near anyone else known to be involved in leukemia.

Bluebird Bio is still investigating whether its treatment is related to acute myelodysplastic syndrome, but officials have asked the Food and Drug Administration to allow their clinical trials to continue.

A separate sickle cell study at Boston Children’s Hospital was also discontinued when Bluebird Bio announced the two cancers at the request of the National Institutes of Health, which is paying for the study.

Dr. David Williams, a hematologist at Boston Children’s and lead researcher on the study, said the researchers are asking permission from the NIH to resume their work.

Like Bluebird Bio investigators, Dr. Williams and his colleagues used a disabled lentivirus to deliver a gene to sickle cell patients. Lentiviruses are considered safe – hundreds of patients in other gene therapy studies have been treated with them and no blood cancers have been reported. The possibility that lentiviruses may not be safe was a matter of great concern.

The leukemia patient in the Bluebird Bio study had genetic abnormalities related to leukemia, which could explain why they developed.

Philip Gregory, the company’s chief scientist, said it was not yet clear whether the patient diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome actually had it. So far, Bluebird Bio has not been able to find any cancer cells in its bone marrow.

“He may have been diagnosed prematurely,” said Dr. Gregory. If cancer cells are found in the patient’s marrow, the company will perform the same detailed molecular analysis it did for the leukemia patient, added Dr. Gregory added.

Dr. John Tisdale, director of cellular and molecular therapeutics at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, was cautiously optimistic.

“These data actually dismiss the vector as causal,” he wrote in an email. He added that the researchers need a better understanding of the study participants’ illnesses before they can exhale one last sigh of relief.

Categories
Health

NIH halts trial of Covid plasma remedy after researchers discovered no profit

Convalescent plasma from a patient with recovered coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is seen at the Central Seattle Donor Center of Bloodworks Northwest during the outbreak in Seattle, Washington on April 17, 2020.

Lindsey Wasson | Reuters

The National Institutes of Health announced Tuesday that they had abandoned a study testing convalescent plasma in patients with mild to moderate Covid-19 symptoms after an independent panel of experts concluded it was unlikely to be beneficial.

The independent data and safety watchdog met on February 25 to review the data and found that while plasma treatment did no harm, it was unlikely to be of benefit to this patient population, the NIH said in a press release. After the meeting, the DSMB recommended that the NIH no longer enroll new patients in the study, the agency said.

Scientists and public health officials had previously said they were skeptical that convalescent plasma would be an effective treatment for patients with Covid, even after the Food and Drug Administration issued emergency approval for the treatment in August and former President Donald Trump said it was ” Breakthrough “denounced. “

At the time, Dr. Scott Gottlieb, a former FDA commissioner, said the treatment could help patients but “doesn’t look like a home run”. He agreed that convalescent plasma “certainly” met the standard for an emergency permit “in the context of a public health emergency.”

The plasma, taken from patients who have recovered from Covid-19 and who have developed antibodies to the virus, is infused into sick patients. Scientists had hoped it would help boost immune systems in these patients to fight the virus.

In January, REMAP-CAP, an international clinical trial investigating possible treatments for Covid, discontinued the study testing convalescent blood plasma after the study’s examiners found no benefit. The decision by REMAP-CAP was made after an initial analysis of more than 900 critically ill study participants in the intensive care unit showed that treatment with the product did not noticeably improve the health of the patients.

The NIH study was conducted in 47 US hospitals emergency departments and had 511 of the 900 participant recruitment targets enrolled. After study participants received either the plasma or a placebo, the researchers tracked whether participants needed additional emergency or urgent treatment, had to be hospitalized, or died within 15 days of the start of the study.

Categories
Health

A New Coronavirus Variant Is Spreading in New York, Researchers Report

A new form of coronavirus is spreading rapidly in New York City and has a worrying mutation that can make vaccines less effective, two research teams have found.

The new variant, named B.1.526, first appeared in samples collected in the city in November. By the middle of this month, roughly every fourth virus sequence was in a database shared by scientists.

A study of the new variant, led by a group at Caltech, went online on Tuesday. The other was sent to a preprint server by researchers at Columbia University, but is not yet public.

The study has not been peer-reviewed or published in a scientific journal. However, the consistent results suggest the variant’s prevalence is real, experts said.

“It’s not particularly good news,” said Michel Nussenzweig, an immunologist at Rockefeller University who was not involved in the new research. “But just knowing about it is good because then maybe we can do something about it.”

Dr. Nussenzweig said he was more concerned about the New York variant than the one that was quickly spreading in California. Another contagious new variant discovered in the UK currently affects around 2,000 cases in 45 states. It is expected to be the most widespread form of the coronavirus in the United States by the end of March.

Researchers looked at the virus’s genetic material to see how it might change. They examine genetic virus sequences taken from a small fraction of the infected in order to record the emergence of new versions.

Caltech researchers discovered the rise in B.1.526 by looking for mutations in hundreds of thousands of viral genetic sequences in a database called GISAID. “There was a recurring pattern and group of isolates in the New York area that I hadn’t seen,” said Anthony West, a computational biologist at Caltech.

He and his colleagues found that two versions of the coronavirus were more common: one with the E484K mutation seen in South Africa and Brazil, which is believed to help the virus partially evade vaccines; and another with a mutation called S477N that can affect how tightly the virus binds to human cells.

By mid-February, the two together made up about 27 percent of the viral sequences stored in the database in New York City, said Dr. West. (At the moment both are summarized as B.1.526.)

Columbia University researchers took a different approach. They sequenced 1,142 samples from patients at their medical center. They found that 12 percent of people with the coronavirus were infected with the variant that contains the E484K mutation.

Updated

Apr. 24, 2021, 8:33 p.m. ET

Patients infected with the virus that carried this mutation were, on average, about six years older and more likely to be hospitalized. While the majority of patients were found near the hospital – particularly in Washington Heights and Inwood – there were several other cases scattered across the metropolitan area, said Dr. David Ho, director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center.

“We’re seeing cases in Westchester, the Bronx and Queens, lower Manhattan, and Brooklyn,” said Dr. Ho. “So it seems to be widespread. It’s not a single outbreak. “

The team also identified six cases of the variant that beat the UK, two infections with a variant identified in Brazil, and one case of the variant adopted in South Africa. The latter two have never been reported in New York City, said Dr. Ho.

University investigators have alerted New York state and city authorities as well as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said Dr. Ho. He and his colleagues plan to sequence about 100 viral genetic samples daily to monitor the increase in variants.

Other experts said the sudden appearance of coronavirus variants was worrying.

“Given the involvement of E484K or S477N, coupled with the fact that the New York area has strong immunity to the spring wave, this is definitely a good thing,” said Kristian Andersen, a virologist at the Scripps Research Institute in San Diego, who did not participated in the new research effort.

The E484K mutation has appeared independently in many different parts of the world, suggesting that it offers a significant benefit to the virus.

“Variants that have an advantage will increase in frequency pretty quickly, especially as the numbers decrease overall,” said Andrew Read, an evolutionary microbiologist at Penn State University.

The team of Dr. Ho reported in January that the monoclonal antibodies made by Eli Lilly and one of the monoclonal antibodies in a cocktail made by Regeneron are powerless against the variant identified in South Africa.

Several studies have now shown that variants containing the E484K mutation are less susceptible to vaccines than the original form of the virus. The mutation disrupts the activity of a class of antibodies that almost everyone makes, said Dr. Nut branch.

“People who have recovered from the coronavirus or who have been vaccinated are very likely to be able to fight off this variant, there is no doubt about that,” he said. But “they might get a little sick.”

They could also infect others and keep the virus floating around, which could delay herd immunity, he added.

However, other experts were a little more optimistic. “These things are a little less well controlled by vaccines, but they are no orders of magnitude less, which would scare me,” said Dr. Read.

As the virus evolves, the vaccines need to be tweaked, “but in the scheme of things this isn’t a huge concern compared to having a vaccine missing,” said Dr. Read. “I’d say the glass is three quarters full compared to where we were last year.”

Categories
Health

Roche arthritis drug reduces loss of life in hospitalized sufferers with extreme Covid, Oxford researchers say

A pharmacist shows a box of tocilizumab, which is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, in the pharmacy of Cambrai Hospital in France on April 28, 2020.

Pascal Rossignol | Reuters

A drug used to treat people with rheumatoid arthritis appears to reduce the risk of death in hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19, especially when combined with the steroid dexamethasone, Oxford University researchers said Thursday.

Oxford researchers found that the drug tocilizumab, an intravenous drug of A department of the Swiss drug manufacturer Roche also shortened the length of stay for patients in hospitals and reduced the need for a ventilator. The study was part of the recovery study, which has tested a number of potential treatments for Covid-19 since March.

“Previous studies of tocilizumab had shown mixed results and it was unclear which patients might benefit from the treatment,” said Peter Horby, professor at Oxford University and co-investigator for the recovery study, in a statement. “We now know that tocilizumab benefits apply to all COVID patients with low oxygen levels and significant inflammation.”

A total of 2,022 patients were randomly selected to receive tocilizumab, sold under the brand name Actemra, by intravenous infusion and compared to 2,094 patients who were randomly selected to receive standard care alone. The researchers said 82% of patients were also taking a steroid like dexamethasone, another drug that was found to reduce deaths in the sickest Covid-19 patients.

Researchers said 596 patients in the tocilizumab group died within 28 days, compared with 694 patients in the standard care group. That means that for every 25 patients treated with tocilizumab, “an extra life would be saved,” said Oxford researchers.

The drug increased the chances of being discharged from 47% to 54% within 28 days, the researchers said. The benefits have been seen in all patients, including those who need mechanical ventilators in an intensive care unit, they added. In patients who were not given a ventilator prior to the start of the study, tocilizumab reduced the chance of getting invasive mechanical ventilation or death from 38% to 33%, the researchers said.

The researchers said that using tocilizumab in combination with dexamethasone reduced mortality by about a third in patients who require oxygen and by almost half in patients who require a ventilator.

The results of the Oxford study have not yet been published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Public health officials and infectious disease experts say world leaders will need a range of drugs and vaccines to end the pandemic that, according to Johns, will infect more than 107.4 million people in just over a year and has killed at least 2.3 million people at Hopkins University.

In the US, the Food and Drug Administration has approved Gilead Sciences’ antiviral drug Remdesivir for the treatment of Covid-19 patients who are 12 years or older and require hospitalization.

The FDA has approved the use of two monoclonal antibody treatments as well as two vaccines – from Pfizer and Moderna. A third vaccine from Johnson & Johnson is expected to receive FDA approval as early as this month.

The Covid-19 Therapy Randomized Evaluation, or Recovery Study, was launched in March by researchers at Oxford University to find treatments for Covid-19. The study previously showed that hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir ritonavir, azithromycin, and convalescent plasma had no benefits for patients hospitalized with Covid-19.

The study is currently investigating aspirin, the anti-inflammatory drugs baricitinib and colchicine, and Regeneron’s antibody cocktail.

Categories
Health

Kids’s Display Time Has Soared within the Pandemic, Alarming Mother and father and Researchers

Overall, children’s screen time had doubled year over year by May, according to Qustodio, a company that tracks usage on tens of thousands of devices used by children ages 4-15 worldwide. The data showed that usage increased over time: in the US, for example, children spent an average of 97 minutes a day on YouTube in March and April, compared with 57 minutes in February, and almost twice as much as a year earlier – with similar ones Trends in the UK and Spain. The company calls the monthly increase “The Covid Effect”.

Children turn to screens because they say they have no alternative activities or entertainment options – this is where they meet up with friends and go to school – while technology platforms take advantage of it by gaining loyalty through tactics like virtual money rewards or perks in “Limited Edition” seduce you for maintaining the daily “streak” of use.

“This was a gift for them – we gave them a captive audience: our children,” said Dr. Dimitri Christakis, director of the Center for Child Health, Behavior, and Development at Seattle Children’s Research Institute. The costs are borne by the families, said Dr. Christakis, since increased online use is linked to anxiety, depression, obesity and aggression – “and the dependence on the medium itself”.

Crucially, the research only shows associations, which means heavy internet use doesn’t necessarily cause these problems. What concerns the researchers, at least, is that the use of devices is a poor substitute for activities known to be central to health, social, and physical development, including physical games and other interactions with which Children learn to deal with challenging social situations.

Yet parents express a kind of hopelessness with their options. Adhering to the pre-pandemic rules doesn’t just seem impractical, it can feel downright mean to keep children away from an important source of socializing.

Updated

Jan. 15, 2021, 8:45 p.m. ET

“So I take it away and you do what? A puzzle? Learn to sew? Knit? I don’t know what the expectations are, ”said Paraskevi Briasouli, a corporate writer who is raising four children, ages 8, 6, 3, and 1 in a two-bedroom Manhattan apartment with her husband. Device time has replaced sport on weekday afternoons and is up 70 percent on weekends, she said.

Categories
Business

Ohio researchers determine two variants probably originating within the U.S.

Healthcare workers conduct free Covid-19 tests for people in their cars in the parking lot of the Columbus West Family Health and Wellness Center in Columbus, Ohio on November 19, 2020.

Stephen Zenner | AFP | Getty Images

Researchers in Ohio said Wednesday that they discovered two new variants of the coronavirus that likely originated in the United States – one of which quickly became the dominant strain in Columbus, Ohio over a period of three weeks in late December and January.

Like the strain first detected in the UK, the US mutations appear to make Covid-19 more contagious, but they don’t appear to affect the vaccine’s effectiveness, the researchers said.

Ohio State University researchers have not yet released their full results, but they say an unverified study is in the pipeline. Jason McDonald, a spokesman for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, told CNBC that the agency is reviewing the new research.

One of the new strains, found in just one patient in Ohio, contains a mutation identical to the now dominant variant in the UK. Researchers concluded that it “likely appeared in a strain of the virus that is already present in the US”. However, the “Columbus strain,” which researchers said in a press release had become dominant in the city, includes “three other gene mutations not previously seen together in SARS-CoV2.”

“This new strain of Columbus shares the same genetic backbone as previous cases we’ve studied, but these three mutations represent a significant evolution,” said Dr. Dan Jones, Ohio state vice chairman of the molecular pathology division, in a statement. “We know that shift didn’t come from the UK or South African branches of the virus.”

The mutation of the dominant new strain in Columbus – COH.20G / 501Y – “may appear independently in several parts of the world in recent months,” the researchers said.

Peter Mohler, chief scientist at Wexner Medical Center in Ohio, United States and co-author of the upcoming study, said there was no data to suggest the new strain would affect vaccine effectiveness.

“It is important that we do not overreact to this new variant until we receive additional data,” he said in a statement. “We need to understand the effects of mutations on the transmission of the virus, the prevalence of the strain in the population, and the effects on human health.

The Ohio researchers will hold a press conference about their discovery at 11 p.m. ET.

This is the latest news. You can find updates here.

Categories
Health

Alzheimer’s Researchers Examine a Uncommon Mind

While they waited for Aliria’s body to arrive, Dr. Villegas and the staff each other their demands with: freezers checked, sterile gloves, iodine, cell culture medium, tissue preservative mixed and done. The brain bank frequently sends tissue to its staff overseas, and within a few days samples from Aliria’s brain are being examined in Germany and California, as well as Medellín.

Every brain donation does not begin in a hospital morgue, but in a large and well-stocked funeral home. The arrangement allows researchers to remove the brain and quickly take it one block away to their dissection laboratory, after which the family can proceed with a funeral or cremation.

Aliria’s autopsy began at 11:30 a.m. three hours after her death. The senior team members of Dr. Villegas, Dr. Aguillon and Johana Gómez, a biologist dressed in plastic overalls, masks and face shields, took precautions required by the pandemic while a medical student, Carlos Rueda, took notes.

The team removed the brain relatively easily, though the process is always complicated, with connective tissue that needs to be carefully severed. Dr. Villegas then extracted the pituitary gland and olfactory membrane, structures of interest to Alzheimer’s researchers, from deep within the skull. The group took samples of skin, tumor, and vital organs before leaving the remains of their famous patient, on whom so much research hopes were tied, for cremation.

Within minutes, the group came together again in the Brain Bank Dissection Lab, a room no bigger than a walk-in closet, down the street. It was almost 1 p.m. and Dr. Aguillon put Aliria’s brain on a scale. It weighed 894 grams, just under two pounds – significantly less than a healthy brain. Mr. Rueda started photographing it on a rotating platform, on which a three-dimensional image was created, while Dr. Villegas told and Dr. Aguillon typed.

Categories
Health

Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is protected and efficient, researchers

In this September 9, 2020 image, a vaccine marked with a test tube can be seen in front of the AstraZeneca logo.

Given Ruvic | Reuters

LONDON – Developed by UK pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca in partnership with Oxford University, the coronavirus vaccine is the first whose late-stage study results have been independently reviewed and published in a medical journal.

The interim results from the Phase 3 studies with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine were published in the Lancet on Tuesday. Peer review means that articles or studies are reviewed by other experts in the field before they are published and serve as an additional quality control measure on the results.

The study replicated the vaccine study results published a few weeks ago, which showed an average of 70% effectiveness in protecting against the coronavirus.

The two dosage regimens used were also repeated, with the two full doses showing 62% effectiveness and 90% effectiveness shown with the half-full dosage regimen.

This is breaking news. Please try again later.