Categories
Politics

Trump will get little help from main Republican donors

Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a press conference announcing a class action lawsuit against major tech companies at Trump National Golf Club Bedminster on July 07, 2021 in Bedminster, New Jersey.

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images

Several of the Republican Party’s largest and most influential donors are signaling that, for the moment, at least, they have no plans to fund former President Donald Trump’s political operation.

Wealthy financiers like Stephen Ross and Larry Ellison have instead chosen to spend money on the GOP’s efforts to retake Congress in next year’s midterm elections or have supported potential 2024 presidential candidates like Sens. Marco Rubio from Florida and Tim Scott from South Carolina.

Donors are also concerned about how Trump’s organization is spending the mountains of money it has raised from smaller donations.

“Big money, sophisticated people just lose interest in this s — show,” said an adviser to longtime Trump ally in Silicon Valley. Many donors are tired of seeing the former president use his resources on rallies that often make false claims, including the fact that his election was stolen, this person said.

Trump hasn’t ruled out a 2024 presidential run, and he hasn’t made any official announcements. Its political action committees have raised large amounts of money through email and SMS appeals to supporters who frequently criticize President Joe Biden’s performance, most recently his handling of the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

The Trump PACs had over $ 100 million available as of the first half of 2021. CNBC previously reported that its PACs spent nearly $ 8 million on legal fees and over $ 200,000 on Trump’s real estate earlier this year.

“Donors do not donate from the goodness of their hearts. And right now they are being asked to donate to an organization that has no other purpose than pumping money to someone who doesn’t need it and doesn’t use it,” said a Republican Strategist representing financiers on Wall Street: “They have better things to do.”

The donor advisors speaking to CNBC declined to be featured in this story to avoid retaliation from Trump and his supporters.

A Trump spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

The pro-Trump Make America Great Again Action Super PAC, which raised over $ 1.5 million in July and August, is not without some wealthy donors, according to new federal electoral commission filings. MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, who is passionate about false claims about the 2020 election, is among the funders, as are businesswoman and former GOP Senator Kelly Loeffler, Texas bank director Andrew Beal and casino magnate Phillip Ruffin.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

But bigger Republican fundraising forces are instead focusing on efforts by House leadership Kevin McCarthy to retake the House of Representatives and funding pro-GOP redistribution efforts like the National Republican Redistricting Trust. Others support the re-election campaigns of potential presidential candidates in 2024 such as Scott, Rubio and Florida’s Governor Ron DeSantis.

Several people who had previously supported Trump recently hosted a fundraiser for DeSantis’ 2022 gubernatorial campaign in the Upper Hamptons, Long Island. The invitation to the July event shows that the event co-hosts included former Trump Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and billionaire investors Stephen Ross, John Paulson and Ken Griffin.

Paulson was one of the few Wall Street donors to support Trump’s 2020 presidential bid in the final phase of the campaign.

Stephen Ross, who also owns the Miami Dolphins, came under fire in 2019 when he hosted a fundraiser for Trump in the Hamptons. Ross and other directors of Related Cos. are investors in the luxury fitness brand Equinox. SoulCycle and Equinox distanced themselves from the Trump event when customers threatened to boycott.

Wilbur Ross and a Paulson representative did not respond to requests for comment. A spokesman for Stephen Ross declined to comment.

Neither Oracle CEO Larry Ellison nor Oracle CEO Safra Catz made large sums of money available to Trump’s PACs after the election. Both helped raise money for Trump’s re-election campaign. Ellison’s California home was the site of a Trump fundraiser last year. However, in June of that year, Ellison donated $ 5 million to a super PAC that supported Scott’s re-election efforts in South Carolina.

A spokesman for Catz and Ellison did not respond to a request for comment.

The Republican Jewish Coalition, whose PAC supported Trump in last year’s elections, is co-hosting a New York fundraiser for Rubio’s 2022 re-election campaign in September, according to an invitation. The RJC’s board of directors includes a number of influential Republicans, including the co-founder of Home Depot , Bernard Marcus, former Trump adviser Jason Greenblatt and former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer.

Trump may also not be able to count on financial help from Miriam Adelson, a mega-donor and widow of the late casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, who died earlier this year. The couple were among the few business leaders who supported Trump in the last election. They gave millions to a pro-Trump super PAC in the last few months of the campaign.

Since her husband’s death, Adelson has privately told her allies that she has no immediate plans to use much of her money in politics for the time being. That could change as the midterms approach. Records show that in June, Adelson contributed $ 5,000 to the Stand for America PAC, a committee formed by potential 2024 contender and former Trump United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley.

A spokesman for Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands company declined to comment.

Another major Trump and GOP financier is in legal hot water. Investor Tom Barrack was arrested for illegally lobbying then President Trump on behalf of the United Arab Emirates. Barrack has pleaded not guilty to the charges. Even if he had no issues with the Feds, Barrack had hinted that he might not have supported Trump, his longtime friend, for a run in 2024.

“Today it looks like it’s a campaign of division that I’m not interested in,” Barrack told Bloomberg News before he was arrested.

A Barrack spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.

Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebekah were huge supporters of Trump during the 2016 campaign, but there is no indication that they will endorse him in 2024. CNBC reported in 2018 that the Mercers were planning to cut their financial support for Trump.

Records show that the Mercers did not write major checks to Trump’s PACs after his presidency.

For the time being, they are banking on a new face in GOP politics: “Hillbilly Elegy” author and venture capitalist JD Vance, who, after criticizing the ex-president, has taken several nationalist positions in the style of Trump in the past.

Robert and Rebekah Mercer together donated $ 150,000 to a Super PAC in March that supports Vance’s candidacy for the Ohio Senate seat, vacated by retiring Republican Rob Portman.

Mercers representatives did not respond to requests for comment.

Categories
Politics

High Pennsylvania Republican Vows to Assessment 2020 Election Outcomes

The top Republican in the Pennsylvania State Senate promised this week to carry out a broad review of the 2020 election results, a move that comes as G.O.P. lawmakers continue to sow doubts about the contest’s legitimacy by pushing to re-examine votes in battleground states like Arizona.

State Senator Jake Corman, who serves as president pro tempore of the G.O.P.-controlled chamber, made the comments in an interview with a right-wing radio host, and they were first reported by The Philadelphia Inquirer on Tuesday. His remarks were the strongest sign yet that Pennsylvania — which President Biden won by more than 80,000 votes — may press forward with a review of 2020 results, despite no evidence of voter fraud that would have affected the outcome.

In the interview, Mr. Corman said that he wanted to begin “almost immediately” and that hearings would begin this week. He added that he expected to use the full power of the state’s General Assembly, including subpoenas, to conduct the review, which he referred to as a “forensic investigation.”

“We can bring people in, we can put them under oath, we can subpoena records, and that’s what we need to do and that’s what we’re going to do,” Mr. Corman said. “And so we’re going to move forward.”

Previously, State Senator Doug Mastriano, a Republican and vocal proponent of former President Donald J. Trump’s falsehoods about the election, had called for a review of results in three counties.

Until recently the chair of the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee, he sent letters requesting ballots, records and machines from Philadelphia County, which encompasses the state’s largest city and which Mr. Biden won with over 80 percent of the vote; York County, south of Harrisburg, which Mr. Trump won handily; and Tioga County, in the northern part of the state, which Mr. Trump also carried with ease. All three counties refused to comply, and Mr. Mastriano’s legal authority to enforce the requests remains unclear.

Last week, Mr. Corman removed Mr. Mastriano from his position as chair of the committee and installed State Senator Cris Dush, also a Republican, to lead the panel and oversee the review.

In the interview, Mr. Corman expressed his own doubts about the election.

“I don’t necessarily have faith in the results,” he said. “I think that there were many problems in our election that we need to get to the bottom of.”

Mr. Corman’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Veronica Degraffenreid, who as the acting secretary of the commonwealth oversees Pennsylvania’s elections, has discouraged counties from participating in any election reviews, noting that any inspection of voting machines by uncredentialed third parties would result in their decertification, and that counties would have to bear the considerable costs of replacing the equipment.

“The Department of State encourages counties to refuse to participate in any sham review of past elections that would require counties to violate the trust of their voters and ignore their statutory duty to protect the chain of custody of their ballots and voting equipment,” Ms. Degraffenreid’s office said in a statement last month.

It remains unclear exactly how Mr. Corman and the Pennsylvania Senate will proceed with their review, including what they might seek in terms of equipment and records, and which counties they might focus on. Mr. Corman did say that, after talking with fellow legislators in Arizona, he was looking for a “neutral arbiter” to help carry out the review — a potential nod to how the Maricopa County review became widely ridiculed in part because the chief executive of the company carrying out the re-examination had promoted conspiracy theories about rigged voting machines costing Mr. Trump victory in the state.

“I think it’s important that we get people involved that don’t have ties to anybody, that are professional, that will do the job so that we can stand behind the results,” Mr. Corman said.

Categories
Health

Schooling Secretary criticizes Republican governors over ban on masks in faculties.

WASHINGTON — The Biden administration admonished the Republican governors of Texas and Florida on Friday for blocking local school districts from requiring masks or taking other measures to protect students from the coronavirus in the coming school year.

The secretary of education, Miguel Cardona, sent a pair of letters to the governors and their education commissioners, writing that he was concerned about recent executive actions taken by both governors.

Those orders, he wrote, prohibited districts from “voluntarily adopting science-based strategies for preventing the spread of Covid-19 that are aligned with the guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,” like universal masking. The letters were made public late Friday.

The debate over whether local school districts should be able to require masks has become highly partisan. Republicans have cast mask rules as an infringement on parental rights, while Democrats have said they are a matter of public health.

Last week President Biden also sharply criticized Republican governors like Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida and Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas who had banned mask mandates, saying they “are passing laws and signing orders that forbid people from doing the right thing.”

“If you aren’t going to help, at least get out of the way,” Mr. Biden said.

In one letter released Friday, Dr. Cardona criticized Governor DeSantis for threatening this week to withhold the salaries of district superintendents or school board members who defied his order.

The education secretary noted that the American Rescue Plan Act passed by Congress allocated more than $7 billion to the state for safety measures. None of the money has been made available to local districts, Dr. Cardona wrote, and it could be used to pay the salaries of school officials.

“In fact, it appears that Florida has prioritized threatening to withhold state funds from school districts that are working to reopen schools safely rather than protecting students and educators and getting school districts the federal pandemic recovery funds to which they are entitled,” Dr. Cardona wrote.

In his letter to Texas officials, Dr. Cardona criticized Governor Abbott’s executive order blocking mask rules in schools as well as other state guidance that makes contract-tracing optional.

Dr. Cardona said Governor Abbott’s order “may infringe upon a school district’s authority to adopt policies to protect students and educators as they develop their safe return to in-person instruction plans required by federal law.”

The offices of Governor DeSantis and Governor Abbott did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

He suggested that the state’s actions might imperil its federal relief funding. The policies, he wrote, appeared to “restrict the development of local health and safety policies and are at odds with the school district planning process,” which are required under the Education Department’s rules for receiving the relief funding.

Dr. Cardona said his department’s rules emphasize that districts have discretion over how to use their funding, and that contact tracing, indoor masking policies, and other C.D.C recommendations are permitted and encouraged.

Dr. Cardona added that the Biden administration would “continue to closely review and monitor” whether both states were meeting requirements under federal funding laws.

Dr. Cardona also expressed support for districts in both states that have defied the governors’ orders.

“The Department stands with these dedicated educators who are working to safely reopen schools and maintain safe in-person instruction,” he wrote.

Categories
Politics

Democratic Insider and a Republican Backed by Trump Win Ohio Home Races

The race was not so much symbolic of a liberal-moderate divide among the Democrats as a clash between an insider who rose quickly in local party circles and an agitator who made a living from alienating party leaders by showing their commitment to liberals Ideals questioned. Both candidates were solidly liberal in their views on a number of issues, including legalizing marijuana and, in some cases, making college more affordable or free.

External political groups from different corners of the democratic coalition invested heavily in the race. Ms. Turner was backed by leftist environmental interests in support of the Green New Deal; the political group founded by Senator Bernie Sanders and once headed Our Revolution; and two progressive groups, the Working Families Party and Justice Democrats.

Ms. Brown was more likely to support institutional actors and politicians such as the Political Committee of the Congressional Black Caucus; several senior members of the caucus; James E. Clyburn Rep. Of South Carolina, Whip of the Democratic House of Representatives; Hillary Clinton; Jewish Democrats; Cleveland Area Black Churches; and unofficially Marcia Fudge, who vacated this year to become Mr. Biden’s Secretary for Housing and Urban Development and agreed to have her mother appear in an advertisement for Ms. Brown because she needed to remain neutral as a government official.

Democratic leaders in Washington and groups often at odds with the progressive left were concerned that a victory by Ms. Turner, who topped double digits in early polls and initially raised more money than Ms. Brown, could herald a new round of hostilities within the party for the Democrats.

And the establishment hit back hard – to a degree that it has not had in previous struggles when candidates with the support of party activists such as New York MPs Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Jamaal Bowman knock out seasoned politicians with little resistance.

This time, while Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and other stars of the left in Ohio were fighting for Ms. Turner, prominent members of the Congressional Black Caucus such as Mr. Clyburn visited the district and implored the people to choose Ms. Brown as someone who was respectful and to be willing to work with fellow Democrats – an implicit criticism of Ms. Turner’s more confrontational style. She was openly criticized by many, such as Mississippi MP Bennie Thompson, who called Ms. Turner a “lonely know-it-all”.

Advertising attacking Ms. Turner’s professionalism and character was ubiquitous in the district in the last days of the campaign. An ad by centrist group Third Way compared Ms. Turner’s political style and tone to that of Mr. Trump, and reiterated a moment on camera when she was struggling for survival during the campaign by making a rough analogy with choosing between Mr. Biden, whom she did not support, and Mr. Trump.

Categories
Health

How Republican Coronavirus Vaccine Opposition Bought to This Level

Republican lawmakers thanked her for theirs after Sherri Tenpenny, a doctor from the Cleveland area, mistakenly suggested during a hearing in the Ohio House of Representatives last month that Covid vaccines “magnetize” people and “interface” with 5G cell towers “Enlightenment”. Testimony.

In Congress, Republicans who once praised the Trump administration for its work to facilitate the rapid development of vaccines are campaigning vaccine misinformation that cast doubt on the Capitol’s safety and effectiveness.

And this week, Republican lawmakers in Tennessee successfully pressured health officials to end child outreach for all vaccines. The policy prohibits sending reminders of the second dose of a Covid vaccine to young people who have received a vaccination and communicating about routine vaccinations such as the flu shot.

A wave of opposition to Covid vaccines has risen within the Republican Party as conservative news outlets produce an ongoing diet of misinformation about vaccines and some GOP lawmakers invite vaccine conspiracy theorists to testify in state houses and Congress. With very little opposition from party leaders, these Republican efforts have brought falsehoods and doubts about vaccination off the fringes of American life into the focus of our political discussions.

It’s a pattern seen across the Trump administration: instead of blaming conspiratorial thinking and inaccuracies when it spreads within their party’s grassroots, many Republicans tolerate extremist misinformation.

Some Conservatives are spreading the falsehoods to rally their political base by taking up ideas like stolen elections, rampant electoral fraud, and revisionist history of the deadly siege of the Capitol. Many others say very little and prefer to evade questions from the news media.

Those who speak up remain reluctant to explicitly name colleagues who voiced misinformation or media personalities who did so, like Tucker Carlson of Fox News.

“As far as I know, we don’t control conservative media figures – at least I don’t,” Utah Republican Senator Mitt Romney recently told the New York Times. “That being said, I think it’s a huge mistake if someone suggests that we shouldn’t take vaccines.”

The anti-vaccination sentiment is not new to Republican voters. During the 2016 Republican primary, a number of candidates, including Donald J. Trump, reiterated theories that vaccines cause autism in children. It was around this time that Republican lawmakers began to oppose laws that tightened vaccination requirements for children.

But in recent months, change has accelerated within the party as some of Mr Trump’s supporters believe the national effort to promote Covid vaccination is harmful, unconstitutional, or perhaps even a sign of a shameful government conspiracy.

“Think about what these mechanisms could be used for,” said North Carolina MP Madison Cawthorn of the Biden administration’s plan to go door-to-door to reach millions of unvaccinated Americans, claiming without evidence, “They could then go door to door to take your guns with you. You could go door to door to take your Bibles with you. “

In a report earlier this month, the Kaiser Family Foundation found a widening vaccination gap between Republican and Democratic areas, with nearly 47 percent of people in counties President Biden-won being fully vaccinated, compared with 35 percent of people in Trump counties. In a recent Washington Post-ABC News poll, 47 percent of Republicans said they were unlikely to get vaccinated, compared with just 6 percent of Democrats.

As Covid cases rise across the country, almost all recent hospital admissions and deaths have occurred in unvaccinated people, White House officials said. While the national outlook remains much better than on previous uptrends, Vivek Murthy, the doctor general, issued his first recommendation to the Biden government this week warning of the “urgent threat” of health misinformation.

There is a tendency among Republican leaders to quietly – and sometimes not quite so quietly – attribute support for marginal beliefs and figures to Mr Trump. But when it comes to vaccinations, it’s hard to blame the former president.

Updated

July 17, 2021, 12:04 p.m. ET

Mr. Trump has eagerly recognized the accelerated development process of vaccines and urged Americans to get vaccinated. (He was tacitly given a vaccine before stepping down, however, rather than holding a public event for the shot, which might have encouraged his supporters to follow suit.) In an interview with Fox News last month, the former president said he made a statement “Very young people” concerned about the vaccination but said he was “still very convinced of what we did with the vaccine”.

“It’s amazing what we did,” he said. “You see the results.”

Other Republicans have not been quite as steadfast in echoing Mr Trump’s message on vaccines. Last year, Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson praised Trump’s “brilliant” Operation Warp Speed. This year he made a number of dubious claims about side effects and deaths related to the vaccines.

In March, Georgia MP Marjorie Taylor Greene praised Mr. Trump for using the vaccines to save lives. That month, she urged Americans to “just say no” and used images from the Nazi era to criticize the Biden government’s efforts to reach unvaccinated people.

“People have a choice, they don’t need your medical tan shirts on their doorstep to order vaccinations,” she tweeted. “You can’t force people to be part of the human experiment.”

Less than a week later, Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican minority leader, encouraged Americans to get vaccinated, drawing on his experience as a childhood polio survivor.

“We have not one, not two, but three highly effective vaccines, so I am amazed at the difficulty we are having in getting the job done,” he said.

However, when asked by a reporter if part of the challenge came from the words of members of his own party, McConnell disagreed.

“I’ve already answered how I feel about it,” he said. “I can only speak for myself, and I only did that a few minutes ago.”

We want to hear from our readers. Have a question? We will try to answer them. Do you have a comment? We are listening. Email us at onpolitics@nytimes.com or send me a message on Twitter at @llerer.

… That’s roughly the amount deposited into American bank accounts this week for the nearly 60 million children eligible for the Extended Monthly Child Withholding Tax.

“I’m a sentimental person, don’t get me wrong,” Roland Mesnier, a former White House pastry chef, said in a recent interview. “Those were my babies.”

The Great Junk Purge is sweeping America.

Has this newsletter been forwarded to you? Sign up here to receive it in your inbox.

Thank you for reading. On Politics is your guide to the political news cycle and brings clarity out of the chaos.

Is there something you think we are missing? Would you like to see more? We’d love to hear from you. Send us an email at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Categories
Politics

Liz Cheney’s Unlikely Journey From G.O.P. Royalty to Republican Outcast

CASPER, Wyo. — Representative Liz Cheney was holed up in a secure undisclosed location of the Dick Cheney Federal Building, recounting how she got an alarmed phone call from her father on Jan. 6.

Ms. Cheney, Republican of Wyoming, recalled that she had been preparing to speak on the House floor in support of certifying Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s election as president. Mr. Cheney, the former vice president and his daughter’s closest political adviser, consulted with her on most days, but this time was calling as a worried parent.

He had seen President Donald J. Trump on television at a rally that morning vow to get rid of “the Liz Cheneys of the world.” Her floor speech could inflame tensions, he told her, and he feared for her safety. Was she sure she wanted to go ahead?

“Absolutely,” she told her father. “Nothing could be more important.”

Minutes later, Mr. Trump’s supporters breached the entrance, House members evacuated and the political future of Ms. Cheney, who never delivered her speech, was suddenly scrambled. Her promising rise in the House, which friends say the former vice president had been enthusiastically invested in and hoped might culminate in the speaker’s office, had been replaced with a very different mission.

“This is about being able to tell your kids that you stood up and did the right thing,” she said.

Ms. Cheney entered Congress in 2017, and her lineage always ensured her a conspicuous profile, although not in the way it has since blown up. Her campaign to defeat the “ongoing threat” and “fundamental toxicity of a president who lost” has landed one of the most conservative House members in the most un-Cheney-like position of resistance leader and Republican outcast. Ms. Cheney has vowed to be a counterforce, no matter how lonely that pursuit might be or where it might lead, including a possible primary challenge to Mr. Trump if he runs for president in 2024, a prospect she has not ruled out.

Beyond the daunting politics, Ms. Cheney’s predicament is also a father-daughter story, rife with dynastic echoes and ironies. An unapologetic Prince of Darkness figure throughout his career, Mr. Cheney was always attuned to doomsday scenarios and existential threats he saw posed by America’s enemies, whether from Russia during the Cold War, Saddam Hussein after the Sept. 11 attacks, or the general menace of tyrants and terrorists.

Ms. Cheney has come to view the current circumstances with Mr. Trump in the same apocalyptic terms. The difference is that today’s threat resides inside the party in which her family has been royalty for nearly half a century.

“He is just deeply troubled for the country about what we watched President Trump do,” Ms. Cheney said of her father. “He’s a student of history. He’s a student of the presidency. He knows the gravity of those jobs, and as he’s watched these events unfold, certainly he’s been appalled.”

On the day last month that Ms. Cheney’s House colleagues ousted her as the third-ranking Republican over her condemnations of Mr. Trump, she invited an old family friend, the photographer David Hume Kennerly, to record her movements for posterity. After work, they repaired to her parents’ home in McLean, Va., to commiserate over wine and a steak dinner.

“There was maybe a little bit of post-mortem, but it didn’t feel like a wake,” said Mr. Kennerly, the official photographer for President Gerald R. Ford while Mr. Cheney was White House chief of staff. “Mostly, I got a real sense at that dinner of two parents who were extremely proud of their kid and wanted to be there for her at the end of a bad day.”

Mr. Cheney declined to be interviewed for this article, but provided a statement: “As a father, I am enormously proud of my daughter. As an American, I am deeply grateful to her for defending our Constitution and the rule of law.”

The Cheneys are a private and insular brood, though not without tensions that have gone public. Ms. Cheney’s opposition to same-sex marriage during a brief Senate campaign in 2013 enraged her sister, Mary Cheney, and Mary’s longtime partner, Heather Poe. It was conspicuous, then, when Mary conveyed full support for her sister after Jan. 6.

“As many people know, Liz and I have definitely had our differences over the years,” she wrote in a Facebook post on Jan. 7. “But I am very proud of how she handled herself during the fight over the Electoral College…Good job Big Sister.’’

In an interview in Casper, Ms. Cheney, 54, spoke in urgent, clipped cadences in an unmarked conference room of the Dick Cheney Federal Building, one of many places that carry her family name in the nation’s least populous and most Trump-loving state. Her disposition conveyed both determination and worry, and also a sense of someone who had endured an embattled stretch.

Ms. Cheney had spent much of a recent congressional recess in Wyoming and yet was rarely seen in public. The appearances she did make — a visit to the Chamber of Commerce in Casper, a hospital opening (with her father) in Star Valley — were barely publicized beforehand, in large part for security concerns. She has received a stream of death threats, common menaces among high-profile critics of Mr. Trump, and is now surrounded by a newly deployed detail of plainclothes, ear-pieced agents.

Her campaign spent $58,000 on security from January to March, including three former Secret Service officers, according to documents filed with the Federal Election Commission. Ms. Cheney was recently assigned protection from the Capitol Police, an unusual measure for a House member not in a leadership position. The fortress aura around Ms. Cheney is reminiscent of the “secure undisclosed location” of her father in the days after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Ms. Cheney’s temperament bears the imprint of both parents, especially her mother, Lynne Cheney, a conservative scholar and commentator who is far more extroverted than her husband. But Mr. Cheney has long been his eldest daughter’s closest professional alter ego, especially after he left office in 2009, and Ms. Cheney devoted marathon sessions to collaborating on his memoir, “In My Times.” Their work coincided with some of Mr. Cheney’s gravest heart conditions, including a period in 2010 when he was near death.

His health stabilized after doctors installed a blood-pumping device that kept him alive and allowed him to travel. This included trips between Virginia and Wyoming in which Mr. Cheney would drive while dictating stories to Ms. Cheney in the passenger seat, who would type his words into a laptop. He received his heart transplant in 2012.

Father and daughter promoted the memoir in joint appearances, with Ms. Cheney interviewing her father in venues around the country. “She was basically there with her dad to ease his re-entry back to health on the public stage,” said former Senator Alan K. Simpson, a Wyoming Republican and a longtime family friend.

By 2016, Ms. Cheney had been elected to Congress and quickly rose to become the third-ranking Republican, a post her father also held. As powerful as Mr. Cheney was as vice president, he had always considered himself a product of the House, where he had served as Wyoming’s at-large congressman from 1979 to 1989.

Neither father nor daughter is a natural politician in any traditional sense. Mr. Cheney was a plotter and bureaucratic brawler, ambitious but in a quiet, secretive and, to many eyes, devious way. Ms. Cheney was largely focused on strategic planning and hawkish policymaking.

After graduating from Colorado College (“The Evolution of Presidential War Powers” was her senior thesis), Ms. Cheney worked at the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development while her father was defense secretary. She attended the University of Chicago Law School and practiced at the firm White & Case before returning to the State Department while her father was vice president. She was not sheepish or dispassionate like her father — she was a cheerleader at McLean High School — but held off running for office until well into her 40s.

Once in the House, Ms. Cheney was seen as a possible speaker — a hybrid of establishment background, hard-line conservatism and partisan instincts. While she had reservations about Mr. Trump, she was selective with her critiques and voted with him 93 percent of time and against his first impeachment.

As for Mr. Cheney, his distress over the Trump administration was initially focused on foreign policy, though he eventually came to view the 45th president’s performance overall as abysmal.

“I had a couple of conversations with the vice president last summer where he was really deeply troubled,” said Eric S. Edelman, a former American ambassador to Turkey, a Pentagon official in the George W. Bush administration and family friend.

As a transplant recipient whose compromised immune system placed him at severe risk of Covid-19, Mr. Cheney found that his contempt for the Trump White House only grew during the pandemic. He had also known and admired Dr. Anthony S. Fauci for many years.

At the same time, Ms. Cheney publicly supported Dr. Fauci and seemed to be trolling the White House last June when she tweeted “Dick Cheney says WEAR A MASK” over a photograph of her father — looking every bit the stoic Westerner — sporting a face covering and cowboy hat (hashtag “#realmenwearmasks”).

She has received notable support in her otherwise lonely efforts from a number of top-level figures of the Republican establishment, including many of her father’s old White House colleagues. Former President George W. Bush — through a spokesman — made a point of thanking Mr. Cheney “for his daughter’s service” in a call to his former vice president on his 80th birthday in January.

Ms. Cheney did wind up voting for Mr. Trump in November, but came to regret it immediately. In her view, Mr. Trump’s conduct after the election went irreversibly beyond the pale. “For Liz, it was like, I just can’t do this anymore,” said former Representative Barbara Comstock, Republican of Virginia.

Ms. Cheney returned last week to Washington, where she had minimal dealings with her former leadership cohorts and was less inhibited in sharing her dim view of certain Republican colleagues. On Tuesday, she slammed Representative Paul Gosar of Arizona for repeating “disgusting and despicable lies” about the actions of the Capitol Police on Jan. 6.

“We’ve got people we’ve entrusted with the perpetuation of the Republic who don’t know what the rule of law is,” she said. “We probably need to do Constitution boot camps for newly sworn-in members of Congress. Clearly.”

She said her main pursuit now involved teaching basic civics to voters who had been misinformed by Mr. Trump and other Republicans who should know better. “I’m not naïve about the education that has to go on here,” Ms. Cheney said. “This is dangerous. It’s not complicated. I think Trump has a plan.”

Ms. Cheney’s own plan has been the object of considerable speculation. Although she was re-elected in 2020 by 44 percentage points, she faces a potentially treacherous path in 2022. Several Wyoming Republicans have already announced plans to mount primary challenges against Ms. Cheney, and her race is certain to be among the most closely followed in the country next year. It will also provide a visible platform for her campaign to ensure Mr. Trump “never again gets near the Oval Office” — an enterprise that could plausibly include a long-shot primary bid against him in 2024.

Friends say that at a certain point, events — namely Jan. 6 — came to transcend any parochial political concerns for Ms. Cheney. “Maybe I’m being Pollyanna a little bit here, but I do think Liz is playing the long game,” said Matt Micheli, a Cheyenne lawyer and former chairman of the Wyoming Republican Party. Ms. Cheney has confirmed as much.

“This is something that determines the nature of this Republic going forward,” she said. “So I really don’t know how long that takes.”

Categories
Politics

How Republican States Are Increasing Their Energy Over Elections

LaGRANGE, Georgia – Lonnie Hollis has served on the Troup County’s Electoral Committee in western Georgia since 2013. As a Democrat and one of two black women on the board, she spoke out in favor of the Sunday election, helped voters on election days and moved to a new district in a black church in a nearby town.

But this year, Ms. Hollis will be removed from the board, the result of a local electoral law signed by Governor Brian Kemp, a Republican. Previously, the members of the electoral board were elected by both political parties, the district commissioner and the three largest municipalities in the Troup district. Now the GOP-controlled district commission has sole power to restructure the board and appoint all new members.

“I speak out and know the laws,” said Ms. Hollis in an interview. “The bottom line is that they don’t like people who have any kind of intelligence and know what they’re doing because they know they can’t influence them.”

Mrs. Hollis is not alone. Across Georgia, at least 10 district electoral committees have been dismissed, removed from office, or are likely to be dismissed by local ordinances or new laws passed by the state legislature. At least five are colored and most are Democrats – although some are Republicans – and they will most likely all be replaced by Republicans.

Ms. Hollis, and local officials like her, were some of the earliest victims when Republican-led parliaments took on a massive takeover of the electoral administration in a series of new voting bills this year.

GOP lawmakers have also stripped secretaries of state of their power, exercised more control over state electoral boards, facilitated the overturning of election results, and conducted several partisan reviews and inspections of 2020 results.

Republican lawmakers in 41 states have tabled at least 216 bills to give lawmakers more power over election officials, according to the United States’ United Democracy Center, a new bipartisan organization dedicated to protecting democratic norms. Of these, 24 were enacted in 14 states.

GOP lawmakers in Georgia say the new measures are designed to improve the performance of local bodies and reduce the influence of political parties. But the laws allow Republicans to remove local officials they dislike, and since some of them were Black Democrats, franchise groups fear these are further attempts to disenfranchise colored voters.

The maneuvers risk undermining some of the core controls that served as a bulwark against former President Donald J. Trump as he tried to undermine the 2020 election results. If these bills had come into effect after the election, Democrats say, they would have greatly increased the turmoil Trump and his allies created by attempting to overturn the outcome. They fear that proponents of Trump’s conspiracy theories will soon have much greater control over the levers of the American electoral system.

“It is a barely veiled attempt to wrest control from the officials who led one of the safest elections in our history and to place them in the hands of bad actors,” said Jena Griswold, chairwoman of the Association of Democratic State Secretaries and the current one Colorado Secretary of State. “The risk is the destruction of democracy.”

Officials like Ms. Hollis are responsible for making decisions such as choosing mailbox and district locations, sending out election notices, setting early polling times, and certifying elections. But the new laws also target senior state officials, particularly foreign ministers – both Republican and Democratic – who have stood up against Trump and his allies over the past year.

The Republicans in Arizona have tabled a bill that would largely deprive Katie Hobbs, the Democratic Secretary of State, of her powers on election lawsuits and then expire when she leaves office. And they have tabled another bill that would give the legislature more power in setting guidelines for election administration, an important task currently being carried out by the Foreign Minister.

Under Georgia’s new electoral law, Republicans have severely weakened the office of Secretary of State after Brad Raffensperger, a Republican who is the current secretary, rejected Trump’s demands to “find” votes. You have dismissed the State Secretary as chairman of the state election committee and relieved his voting rights on the board.

The Kansas Republicans in May vetoed Democrat Laura Kelly to pass laws that would deprive the governor of changing electoral law and the Secretary of State, a Republican who repeatedly vouched for the security of postal votes, from the settlement election-related actions without the consent of the legislature.

And more Republicans who hold on to Mr. Trump’s election lies are running for secretary of state, bringing conspiracy theorists to a critical position within reach. In Georgia, MP Jody Hice, a Republican who voted against confirming President Biden’s victory, is running against Raffensperger. Republican candidates with similar views are running for secretary of state in Nevada, Arizona, and Michigan.

“In virtually every state, every polling officer will feel like they’re under the microscope,” said Victoria Bassetti, a senior adviser with the United Democracy Center in the United States.

In the short term, it is local election officials at district and community level who are either deposed or robbed of their power.

In Arkansas, Republicans were stabbed last year when Jim Sorvillo, a three-time state official from Little Rock, lost re-election by 24 votes to Ashley Hudson, a Democrat and local lawyer. It was later found that election officials in Pulaski County, which includes Little Rock, inadvertently tabulated 327 postal ballot papers, 27 of which were from the district, during the vote count.

Mr. Sorvillo filed several lawsuits to prevent Ms. Hudson from being seated, and all of them were denied. The Republican faction considered refusing to seat Ms. Hudson and then eventually voted to accept her.

But last month the Arkansas Republicans passed a new bill that would allow a state committee of electoral officers – made up of six Republicans and one Democrat – to investigate a variety of issues at every stage of the electoral process, from registration onwards, and Initiate corrective action “. for the submission and counting of ballot papers to confirm elections. The law applies to all counties, but it is widely believed to be directed against Pulaski, one of the few in the state who favor Democrats.

The draftsman, State Representative Mark Lowery, a Republican from a suburb of Little Rock, said it was necessary to remove voting power from local authorities, who are Democrats in Pulaski County, because otherwise Republicans could not be shaken fairly .

“Without this legislation, you would have been the only authority to turn to the prosecutor for inappropriateness, who is a Democrat and may have done nothing,” Lowery said in an interview. “This gives another level of investigative power to a state-mandated body to oversee the elections.”

When asked about last year’s election, Mr. Lowery said, “I think Donald Trump was elected President.”

A separate new Arkansas law allows a state board to “vote and conduct” elections in a county when a legislative committee determines that there are questions about the “appearance of an equal, free, and impartial election.”

In Georgia, lawmakers passed a unique law for some counties. For Troup County, State Representative Randy Nix, a Republican, said he only tabled the county electoral board reorganization bill – and which will remove Ms. Hollis – after a motion was requested by county commissioners. He said he was not worried that the commission, a party body made up of four Republicans and one Democrat, could influence the elections.

“The commissioners are all elected officials and will face the electorate to answer for their actions,” Nix said in an email.

Eric Mosley, the county manager for Troup County, which Trump scored 22 points, said the decision to ask Mr. Nix for the bill was intended to make the board more bipartisan. It was unanimously supported by the Commission.

“We believed that the ultimate intent of the board of directors was to choose the removal of both Republican and Democratic representation and the real selection of members of the community who invest heavily to serve those members of the community,” Mosley said. “Our goal is to create both political and racial diversity on the board.”

In Morgan County, east of Atlanta, Helen Butler was one of the most prominent Democratic voices in the state on suffrage and electoral administration. As a member of the county electoral committee in a rural Republican district, she also leads the Georgia Coalition for the People’s Agenda, a group dedicated to protecting the voting rights of black Americans and strengthening their civic engagement.

But Ms. Butler will be removed from the county board at the end of the month after Mr. Kemp signed a local law ending the ability of political parties to appoint members.

“I think this is all part of the local electoral board takeover trick that state lawmakers put in place,” Ms. Butler said. “They say they have a right to say whether an election officer is doing it right, even though they don’t work on a day-to-day basis and don’t understand the process itself.”

It’s not just Democrats who are being removed. In DeKalb County, the fourth largest in the state, Republicans decided not to nominate Baoky Vu to the electoral board again after more than 12 years in office. Mr. Vu, a Republican, had written with the Democrats in a letter that opposed an election-related bill that was ultimately not passed.

To replace Mr. Vu, Republicans nominated Paul Maner, a prominent local conservative with a history of false testimony, including the allusion that the son of a Georgia congressman was killed in “a drug deal gone wrong”.

Back in LaGrange, Ms. Hollis tries to do as much as possible in the remaining time on the board. The additional precinct in nearby Hogansville, where the population is roughly 50 percent black, is a top priority. Although the city only has about 3,000 residents, the city is divided by a railroad, and Ms. Hollis said it can sometimes take a long time to clear a freight car line, which is problematic on election days.

“We worked on it for over a year,” Ms. Hollis said, saying the Republicans had put procedural hurdles in place to block the process. But she was not deterred.

“I’m not going to sit there and wait for you to tell me what to do for the voters there,” she said. “I’ll do the right thing.”

Rachel Shorey contributed to the research.

Categories
Politics

Obamacare survives after Supreme Courtroom rejects newest Republican problem

The Supreme Court ruled 7-2 on Thursday against Texas and other Republican-led states seeking to strike down Obamacare in the law’s latest test before the nation’s highest court.

The court reversed an appeals court ruling that had struck down the law’s individual mandate provision. Chief Justice John Roberts and fellow conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett joined Justice Stephen Breyer’s opinion, as did Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.

Breyer said Texas and the other states that challenged the law failed to show they were harmed by it.

“Neither the individual nor the state plaintiffs have shown that the injury they will suffer or have suffered is ‘fairly traceable’ to the ‘allegedly unlawful conduct’ of which they complain,” Breyer wrote.

The decision marks the third time that Obamacare, officially known as the Affordable Care Act, has survived a challenge before the Supreme Court since former President Barack Obama signed the landmark legislation into law in 2010.

Defenders of Obamacare worried that the Supreme Court – with its 6-3 majority of Republican-appointed justices – would scrap the law, a crucial element of the nation’s health-care system.

President Joe Biden, who served as Obama’s vice president when the law was signed, praised Thursday’s ruling as a “major victory” for millions of Americans who were at risk of losing their health care in the midst of the Covid pandemic if the law was overturned.

Biden also vowed to expand Obamacare, a central promise of his presidential campaign.

“After more than a decade of attacks on the Affordable Care Act through the Congress and the courts, today’s decision – the third major challenge to the law that the U.S. Supreme Court has rejected – it is time move forward and keep building on this landmark law,” Biden said in a statement.

“Today’s decision affirms that the Affordable Care Act is stronger than ever, delivers for the American people, and gets us closer to fulfilling our moral obligation to ensure that, here in America, health care is a right and not a privilege,” he said.

Obama said the Supreme Court’s ruling makes clear that the law will endure, and the principle of universal health-care coverage has been established.

Two of former President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court picks, Kavanaugh and Barrett, joined the court’s overwhelming majority in rejecting the latest Republican effort to overturn the law. Democrats had warned during Barrett’s confirmation hearings that she was likely to cast a vote in the case that would jeopardize Obamacare.

Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch, both conservatives, dissented from the court’s majority opinion.

“Today’s decision is the third installment in our epic Affordable Care Act trilogy, and it follows the same pattern as installments one and two,” Alito wrote in a dissent that was joined by Gorsuch. “In all three episodes, with the Affordable Care Act facing a serious threat, the Court has pulled off an improbable rescue.”

Trump tried unsuccessfully throughout his one term in office to overturn Obamacare. However, Congress as part of the 2017 tax bill effectively eliminated Obamacare’s so-called individual mandate penalties by reducing them to $0.

Texas and more than a dozen other Republican-led states then filed suit, arguing that that change to the law rendered it unconstitutional. The Supreme Court had previously upheld the mandate under Congress’ power to tax, but the GOP-led states argued that the tax justification was no longer valid if the penalty was nonexistent.

Those states, backed by Trump’s Department of Justice, argued that the entire Affordable Care Act should be erased if the individual mandate provision was found to be unlawful.

The case made its way through federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which agreed that the individual mandate was unconstitutional. But 20 Democrat-led states, led by California, asked the Supreme Court to reverse the appeals court’s judgment, arguing that with the mandate reduced to zero Americans have the choice whether or not to buy insurance.

The Supreme Court agreed in March 2020 to hear the case.

A spokeswoman for Trump did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the court’s ruling.

Numerous Biden administration officials and the top Democrats in Congress were quick to celebrate the decision.

“Each time, in each arena, the Affordable Care Act has prevailed,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said on the Senate floor minutes after the ruling.

“Let me say definitively: The Affordable Care Act has won, the Supreme Court has ruled, the ACA is here to stay. And now, we’re going to try to make it bigger and better,” Schumer said.

“What a day,” he added.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who was instrumental in the law’s passage, hailed the ruling and praised Obamacare as a “pillar of American health and economic security.”

“Today’s Supreme Court decision is a landmark victory for Democrats’ work to defend protections for people with preexisting conditions,” the California Democrat said during her weekly press conference.

White House chief of staff Ron Klain tweeted “It’s still a BFD” — an apparent reference to Biden’s infamous hot-mic comment at the signing of the bill in 2010, when he whispered to Obama, “this is a big f—— deal.”

“Today is a good day,” tweeted Sabrina Singh, deputy press secretary for Vice President Kamala Harris.

White House communications official Karine Jean-Pierre noted that the ruling marked the third time Obamacare survived a challenge in the high court.

Categories
Politics

Republican senators help bipartisan plan

Senator Mitt Romney, a Republican from Utah, arrives for lunch on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on Wednesday, June 16, 2021.

Sarah Silberner | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Eleven Republican Senators support a bipartisan infrastructure framework, enough for a possible bill to get through the Chamber if all skeptical Democrats support it.

In a statement Wednesday, 21 Democratic and GOP senators backed the roughly $ 1 trillion proposal that would not impose taxes on corporations or wealthy individuals. The plan would reshape transportation, broadband, and water, but would fail to meet many Democrats’ goals for investing in clean energy and social programs.

“We look forward to working with our Republican and Democratic counterparts to develop laws based on this framework to address America’s critical infrastructure challenges,” the senators said in a statement.

The proposal serves as the last sustained effort to reach a bipartisan infrastructure deal before the Democrats pass laws themselves. A smaller bipartisan group of 10 senators who drafted the plan have tried to gain support on Capitol Hill but have not yet received the blessings of congressional leaders or the White House.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

A handful of Senate liberals have threatened to vote against the bipartisan deal, which they believe does not do enough to tackle climate change or income inequality. If Democrats reject the plan, it would have to have more than 10 Republicans backing it for it to reach the 60-vote threshold to pass a bill in the Senate.

Some Democrats have suggested that their party could approve a physical infrastructure plan with Republican backing if skeptics were given assurances that their priorities would be addressed later. The Democrats could then move to balancing the budget themselves to make bigger investments in child and elderly care, green energy, education and health care.

The Democrats must weigh the concerns of both sides of their party. The most conservative Democrat in the Senate, Joe Manchin from West Virginia, has stressed that he wants to pass an infrastructure law with GOP votes.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said Democrats would begin drafting a budget resolution on Wednesday, even if bipartisan talks continue. He said a proposal that includes social and climate programs included in President Joe Biden’s American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan “is under Senate consideration even if it does not have bipartisan support.”

“There are many points to discuss, but one subject is not up for debate: I will instruct Members to ensure that any budgetary decision puts the United States on the right track to reduce carbon emissions to an extent commensurate with the climate crisis.” said Schumer of New York, said earlier Wednesday.

Biden left Geneva, Switzerland after meeting Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday and said he had not seen the details of the bipartisan plan. However, he noted that his chief of staff, Ron Klain, believes there is “some room” for a deal with the Republicans.

White House advisers met on Wednesday with the five Democratic senators negotiating the proposal. In a statement to NBC News after the meeting, White House spokesman Andrew Bates said officials “found it productive and encouraging.”

“They look forward to briefing the president on his return to the White House tomorrow and continuing to consult with senators and representatives on the way forward,” he said.

Paying for the infrastructure plan could be an issue. Republicans have insisted they will not touch their 2017 tax bill, which lowered the corporate tax rate to 21%. Biden wants to raise corporate tax to at least 25%.

The president has also promised not to raise taxes for those earning less than $ 400,000 a year. One potential source of revenue in the bipartisan plan – tying the gas tax to inflation – could effectively break its promise.

The Republicans who signed the statement on Wednesday are Sens. Richard Burr of North Carolina; Bill Cassidy of Louisiana; Susan Collins, Maine; Lindsey Graham from South Carolina; Lisa Murkowski from Alaska; Rob Portman from Ohio; Mitt Romney from Utah; Mike Rounds from South Dakota; Thom Tillis from North Carolina, Todd Young from Indiana, and Jerry Moran from Kansas.

The Democrats who have joined them are Sens. Chris Coons of Delaware; Maggie Hassan from New Hampshire; John Hickenlooper, Colorado; Mark Kelly from Arizona; Joe Manchin from West Virginia; Jeanne Shaheen from New Hampshire; Kyrsten Sinema from Arizona and Mark Warner from Virginia. Senator Angus King, an independent Maine working with the Democrats, also signed the statement.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Politics

Biden needs Republican Capito to extend counteroffer

United States President Joe Biden will address the Middle East on May 20, 2021 at the Cross Hall of the White House in Washington, DC.

Nicholas Comb | AFP | Getty Images

President Joe Biden wants Republicans to increase spending on their infrastructure plan ahead of Friday’s talks that will determine whether Washington can pass bipartisan law to upgrade transportation, broadband and water systems.

During a meeting on Wednesday, Biden told GOP Senator Shelley Moore Capito that he wanted the plan to include $ 1 trillion in new spending – or above the baseline set under the existing policy, NBC News reported. While Republicans recently sent Biden a counteroffer totaling $ 928 billion, it contained only about $ 250 billion in new money.

Biden also reiterated that he plans to fund an infrastructure bill by increasing the corporate tax rate, according to NBC. The GOP opposes any change to its 2017 Tax Act, which cut corporate tax from 35% to 21%. On Thursday, the Washington Post and Reuters reported that Biden had offered to keep the corporate tax rate in place and instead rely on a minimum tax of 15% to curb underpayment for profitable American companies.

Capito, a Republican from West Virginia, shared the details of the meeting with five other Republican senators on her infrastructure negotiation team, NBC reported. The GOP expects to send Biden another counter offer on Friday, the day Biden and Capito want to speak again.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

The priorities outlined by Biden on Wednesday highlight the hurdles negotiators face on the way to a bipartisan deal. Despite weeks of maneuvers, the parties did not agree on what should be included in an infrastructure bill or how the plan should be financed.

The White House has signaled that it could go ahead and try to pass laws only with democratic votes if talks don’t progress by next week. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm told CNBC on Wednesday that the negotiations were “limited in time”.

However, neither Democrats nor Republicans have shown that they want to be the ones to leave the talks.

The GOP’s $ 928 billion plan was roughly half of Biden’s latest $ 1.7 trillion proposal. Democrats want a bill to go beyond conventional notions of infrastructure, but Republicans have opposed including policies on transport, broadband and utilities.

The White House package includes major investments in care for elderly and disabled Americans, homes, schools, electric vehicles, and clean energy. Democrats have emphasized the need to stimulate the economy over the long term by making it easier for workers to find care for dependent family members and by preparing buildings and critical infrastructure for the effects of climate change.

Republicans intend to limit a plan to investments in areas such as roads, bridges, airports, ports, waterways, broadband and water systems.

Agreeing on how to offset expenses could prove just as difficult as deciding what to include on the bill. Republicans have announced that they will not agree to an increase in corporate taxes. Biden wants to raise the rate to at least 25%.

The White House rejects a GOP proposal to reuse the coronavirus aid money passed by the Democrats earlier this year.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.