Categories
World News

In Pakistan, Textbooks That includes Malala Eliminated From Bookstores

KARACHI, Pakistan – Provincial police in Pakistan this week raided bookstores and confiscated copies of an elementary school social studies textbook containing a picture of education activist Malala Yousafzai, a polarizing figure in the country.

The picture of Ms. Yousafzai, who received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2014, appeared in a chapter on national heroes with Pakistan’s founder Muhammad Ali Jinnah.

The world’s youngest Nobel Prize winner, Malala, as the 24-year-old is widely known, is celebrated worldwide as a courageous figure of her activism, despite being shot in the head by a Taliban rifle in Pakistan’s Swat Valley as a schoolgirl in 2012.

Her biography “I am Malala”, which she wrote together with the experienced British foreign correspondent Christina Lamb, was an international bestseller. The following year, 2014, she was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.

But in her own country she is the subject of heated debate.

“For many in Pakistan, Malala symbolizes everything they think they hate the West,” said Nida Kirmani, professor of sociology at Lahore University of Management Sciences in Pakistan. “For others, it is a symbol of women’s rights and resistance to Islamist forces,” she added.

“For these reasons she has become a divisive figure.”

Critics say the seizures show a desire to repress critical thinking and a growing intolerance of opinions that contradict conservative Islamic beliefs and cultural norms.

In 2012, Taliban militants attempted to assassinate Ms. Yousafzai on a bus returning from school after the BBC website published an article about her experience under her rule. She moved to the UK and graduated from Oxford University last year.

Last month, in an interview with UK Vogue magazine about where her young life could lead, Ms. Yousafzai questioned the need for marriage, which sparked a backlash in Pakistan. “I still don’t understand why people have to get married,” she said, according to the article. “If you want someone in your life, why do you have to sign marriage papers, why can’t it just be a partnership?”

In May, her tweet enraged that “violence in Jerusalem – especially against children – is unbearable,” a number of Pakistanis who neither mention the Palestinians nor condemn Israel.

Police and officials from the Punjab Curriculum and Textbook Board, a provincial agency, began raiding stores across the city on Monday to confiscate copies of the book. The board did not want to say how many stores were searched or how many books were confiscated.

On Monday, Ms. Yousafzai’s birthday, celebrated as Malala Day by some in Pakistan, authorities confiscated the entire inventory of textbooks from the Oxford University Press publishing office in Lahore, saying the company had not received a certificate of objection, or NOC, from the government.

“No NOC means breaking the law,” Punjab Provincial Education Minister Murad Raas said in a tweet.

Oxford University press office staff in Lahore declined an interview request.

On Tuesday, the All Pakistan Private Schools Federation, an organization that claims to represent 150,000 schools, launched a documentary entitled “I Am Not Malala” to express their controversial views on Islam, marriage and their pursuit of a Western agenda to highlight.

“Parents do not want their children to follow in Malala’s footsteps, even if she continues to win awards,” said Kashif Mirza, president of the association. “Malala has fallen into the trap of the West and is now working on a Western agenda against Pakistan and Islam.”

The same association previously ran a campaign against Ms. Yousafzai demanding that the government ban her memoirs for what they claimed was offensive to Islam and the “ideology of Pakistan”.

In recent years, as the influence of the Pakistani Taliban and other militant Islamist groups has increased, textbooks and other teaching materials have been scrutinized.

Riaz Shaikh, an academic based in the eastern city of Karachi who was involved in the development of textbooks in Sindh Province, said that in the textbooks Ms. Yousafzai, Mr. Salam, and Iqbal Masih, a Pakistani Christian child activist, who was involved in the campaign against abusive child labor and was murdered at the age of 11. Islamist groups then targeted the textbook authors with death threats.

Dr. Bernadette L. Dean, Dr. Shaikh’s colleague in the group and a well-known educator fled Pakistan in 2015 out of fear for her life.

“Unfortunately, Pakistani society has evolved into hatred, conspiracy theories and politicization of religion,” said Dr. Shaikh. “For this reason, a significant part of the Pakistani population regards Malala and other heroes as their villains.”

Last year, Punjab’s Curriculum and Textbooks Committee banned 100 textbooks in a single day for calling content “anti-Pakistani” and “blasphemous”. One of the banned children was a math textbook for children that had pictures of pigs – pork is forbidden in Islam – to help explain a math problem.

Last year the provincial parliament recommended banning three groundbreaking books on Islam, including “The First Muslim” and “After the Prophet” by British author Lesley Hazleton, and accused them of blasphemy.

Leading human rights groups and liberal politicians have called for the Punjab Provincial Council to withdraw the order to confiscate the textbook containing Ms. Yousafzai’s photos.

The Pakistani Human Rights Commission, an independent civil oversight agency, said Tuesday the raids “marked a new low in the state’s attempts to control information and manipulate public discourse.”

On Wednesday a member of the Pakistani parliament, Sherry Rehman, defended Ms. Yousafzai on the floor of parliament.

“If you can’t see Benazir Bhutto and Malala Yousafzai as your heroes, then only God can help you,” she said, referring to the former prime minister who was killed in a 2007 suicide bombing in Rawalpindi. “Malala faced extremists and got a bullet in return.”

Zia ur-Rehman reported from Karachi, Pakistan, and Emily Schmall from New Delhi.

Categories
Politics

$325,000 Settlement for Trainer Over Trump References Eliminated From Yearbook

For years, Susan Parsons said she had been directed by administrators to remove “controversial” content from the yearbook for Wall Township, NJ high school

Ms. Parsons, a teacher and yearbook advisor, said in court records that she was required to “erase” a feminist bumper sticker on a student’s laptop, Photoshop clothing on shirtless students, and questionable hand movements on a school trip to Bermuda.

But it wasn’t until 2017 that a particular issue got Ms. Parsons and the district into a national firestorm over freedom of expression and political opinion.

Ms. Parsons was suspended after removing a reference to Donald J. Trump on a student’s shirt, which drew widespread news media attention and death threats, according to a lawsuit she filed against the school district.

Ms. Parsons said she had been instructed by the director’s secretary to remove Mr. Trump’s name and “Make America Great Again” slogan. Ms. Parsons was then publicly scapegoated and silenced by the district, the lawsuit said.

On Tuesday, the county council approved a $ 325,000 settlement to resolve their claims. About $ 204,000 will be paid to Ms. Parsons and the remainder will cover her legal fees and expenses, according to the settlement, according to which the district’s insurers will pay the costs.

“We are delighted that Susan was able to achieve the justice she deserves,” said Christopher J. Eibeler, her lawyer, on Saturday. Under the agreement previously reported by NJ.com, the district denied any wrongdoing.

The district and its attorney did not respond to requests for comment on Saturday. Cheryl Dyer, who was the superintendent at the time the photo was changed, said she had retired from the district and could no longer speak for it.

In her lawsuit, Ms. Parsons said it was unethical to heavily edit yearbook photos and complained to the administration that the “yearbook should reflect reality”.

In December 2016, she was told to remove the reference to Mr. Trump on the student’s shirt after going to the administration office to pick up drafts of the yearbook pages.

Ms Parsons said she agreed to change the photo but was confronted by the student after the yearbooks were handed out in June 2017. “Why did you remove the word Trump from my shirt?” Asked the student. She told him to speak to the headmaster.

Later that day, one of the student’s parents emailed Ms. Parsons saying the student’s picture was “edited without his / our permission.”

“I would like to understand who made this decision,” said the email according to the lawsuit. “We thought the shirt he was wearing was appropriate.”

Two other students then complained that a Trump logo and a quote attributed to Mr. Trump had been removed from the yearbook.

Ms. Parsons said in her suit that the logo was cut out by a photo seller and that a student who was working on the yearbook accidentally left off the quote. Even so, outrage has already exploded in Wall, a community of about 25,000 people near the Jersey Shore that voted for Mr. Trump in 2016 and 2020.

Ms. Parsons said the school authorities had launched a public campaign to protect themselves from responsibility by creating a “false narrative” blaming them for the changes.

For example, Ms. Dyer sent a letter to parents on June 9, 2017, in which, according to court records, she falsely stated that “the high school administration had no knowledge of political censorship and does not condone our students.”

On June 12, 2017, the student, whose logo had been removed, appeared on one of Mr. Trump’s favorite programs, Fox & Friends, and said, “The person or persons who did this should be held accountable, as this is a violation of mine and other people’s initial customization rights. “

That same day, Ms. Parsons said, she was called to a meeting with Ms. Dyer and suspended. Days later, Mr. Trump drew more attention to the subject and deciphered the “yearbook censorship” in high school in a Facebook post.

Recognition…via Susan Parsons

Ms. Dyer said at the time that the changes in the yearbook were “Censorship and the Possible Violation of First Adjustment Rights.”

“This claim is taken very seriously and a thorough investigation into what happened is being vigorously pursued,” she said in a 2017 statement. The student dress code did not prevent students from expressing their political views or becoming a political figure support said she said.

Ms. Parsons told the New York Post: “We have never done anything against a political party.” This prompted Ms. Dyer to email Ms. Parsons’ union representative to remind her that she did not have permission to speak to the newspaper.

Ms. Parsons said the superintendent cited a district media policy that was like a “gag order” preventing her from defending herself.

Recognition…New Jersey Supreme Court

Ms. Parsons, who said on court records she voted for Mr. Trump in 2016, said she was soon inundated with hate mail and harassing phone messages referring to her as a Nazi, communist, anti-American and “traitorous liberal.” ”

She said she was afraid to use her name when ordering takeout and was worried that the drivers might try to beat her if she went on bike tours.

When she returned to school in September 2017, she was “disrespected and ridiculed” by students and others who accused her of removing Trump references from the yearbook.

She sued the district in May 2019 and retired in February 2020.