Categories
Politics

State Dept. Presents Potential Refugee Standing to Extra Afghans Who Labored With U.S.

The State Department is offering potential refugee status to new categories of Afghans who helped the United States during the war in Afghanistan, including those who have worked for the news media and non-governmental organizations.

The ministry announced in an announcement on Monday that the measure was intended to protect Afghans “who may be at risk because of their affiliation with the US,” but who were not eligible for a special immigrant visa program that has started with it , Thousands of Afghans and their family members.

The White House is under heavy pressure to protect Afghans who have worked with the US military for the past 20 years and who may face Taliban reprisals if the United States withdraws its troops from Afghanistan. As the Taliban gains territorial gains across the country, Biden government officials and prominent members of Congress are increasingly concerned about the threat posed by ties to the United States.

The first plane load of more than 200 Afghan interpreters, drivers and other US military aides arrived in the Washington area last week to relocate them as part of a government initiative under two special visa programs prepared by Congress.

Congress created the Special Immigrant Visa Program to provide refuge to Afghans and Iraqis who have helped the US military. But the State Department’s actions on Monday reflected concerns that the program is still putting many Afghans with US ties at risk.

Last month, a coalition of news media organizations – including The New York Times, along with The Washington Post, ABC News, CNN, Fox News, and several others – sent letters to President Biden and the leaders of Congress urging them to take further action To undertake protection of Afghans who had worked as reporters, translators and support staff for the US media in Afghanistan.

The letters indicated that the special immigrant visa program “did not reach the Afghans who served US news organizations. But they and their families face the same threat of retaliation from the Taliban that the American press see as a legitimate target. “

The Taliban “long waged a campaign of threats and killing of journalists,” the letter read, and estimated that around 1,000 Afghans were at risk because of their journalistic affiliations.

The refugee program will also provide shelter for Afghans who worked on US government-funded programs and projects in the country, as well as non-governmental organizations long targeted by the Taliban.

The State Department said Afghans who fail to meet the minimum tenure of the special immigrant visa program would also be granted potential refugee status.

Those eligible for the program would undergo a “comprehensive security clearance” before being allowed to relocate to the United States as refugees, the department said.

While it offers relocation opportunities to new categories of Afghans, the United States continues to work to protect thousands more who have helped the military and are eligible for the special immigrant visa program.

Approximately 2,500 Afghans are being relocated to Fort Lee, Virginia, as part of an effort known by the White House as Operation Allies Refuge to remove them while they are completing their visa and permanent relocation applications in the United States.

Federal officials say around 4,000 more Afghans in the middle of the application process will soon be flown to other countries along with their immediate families before those who have been granted visas are taken to the United States.

Categories
Politics

Biden, in Reversal, Raises Refugee Cap to 62,500 in Subsequent 6 Months

President Biden turned on Monday and said he would allow up to 62,500 refugees to enter the United States over the next six months, removing the sharp limits that former President Donald J. Trump had placed on those seeking refuge before war, violence or nature seek disasters.

“This erases the historically low number set by the previous administration of 15,000 that does not reflect America’s values ​​as a nation that welcomes and supports refugees,” Biden said in a White House statement.

The action came about two weeks after Mr Biden announced he would keep Mr Trump’s line of 15,000 refugees. The announcement was widely condemned by Democratic lawmakers on Capitol Hill and refugee lawyers who accused the president of failing to keep an election promise to admit the needy.

White House officials had insisted that Mr Biden’s intentions were misunderstood in mid-April. However, his decision to raise the refugee limit to 62,500 suggests that he felt pressure to act.

In his statement, Mr Biden admitted that the government is unlikely to relocate 62,500 refugees as the agencies suffered budget and staff cuts during Mr Trump’s tenure. Mr Biden did not say whether the government had already managed to take in the 15,000 refugees admitted by his predecessor.

“The sad truth is we won’t get 62,500 approvals this year,” he said. “We are working quickly to reverse the damage suffered over the past four years. It will take time, but this work is already under way. “

Categories
World News

Biden raises refugee cap to 62,500 after criticism from Democrats

United States President Joe Biden speaks about America’s employment plan after touring Tidewater Community College in Norfolk, Virginia on May 3, 2021.

Almond Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

President Joe Biden will raise the annual US refugee cap for the fiscal year to 62,500 attendees, revising the much lower number set under the Trump administration, which “did not reflect American values,” Biden said Monday.

“It is important to take these measures today to remove all doubts in the minds of refugees around the world who have suffered so much and are eagerly awaiting the start of their new lives,” the president said in a statement.

The Biden administration has faced immense pressure from Democrats and activists to quickly raise the refugee ceiling from the historic low of 15,000 set under former President Donald Trump.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage: