Categories
World News

For China’s Single Moms, a Highway to Recognition Paved With False Begins

For a few wonderful weeks, Zou Xiaoqi, a single mother in Shanghai, felt accepted by her government.

After giving birth in 2017, Ms. Zou, a financial clerk, went to court to question Shanghai’s policy of granting maternity benefits only to married women. She had little success and lost one lawsuit and two appeals. Then, earlier this year, the city suddenly dropped its marriage obligation. In March, a jubilant Ms. Zou received a performance check on her bank account.

She had barely started partying when the government reintroduced policy a few weeks later. Unmarried women were again not entitled to government payments for medical care and paid vacation.

“I always knew there was this possibility,” said Ms. Zou, 45 years old. “If you can get me to return the money, I will probably return it.”

The Shanghai authorities’ flip-flop reflects a broader view in China of longstanding attitudes towards family and gender.

Chinese law does not specifically prohibit single women from giving birth. However, official family planning guidelines only mention married couples, and local officials have long provided benefits based on these provisions. Only Guangdong Province, which borders Hong Kong, allows unmarried women to apply for maternity insurance. In many places women still face fines or other punishments for childbirth out of wedlock.

But as China’s birthrate has plummeted in recent years and a new generation of women embraced feminist ideals, these traditional values ​​have come under increasing pressure. Now a small but determined group of women are demanding guaranteed maternity benefits regardless of marital status – and, more generally, recognition of their right to make their own reproductive choices.

The U-turn in Shanghai, however, highlights the challenges facing feminists in China, where women face deeply ingrained discrimination and a government that is suspicious of activism.

It also shows the authorities’ reluctance to give up decades of control over family planning, even in the face of demographic pressures. The ruling Communist Party announced Monday that it would end its two-child policy, which allows couples to have three children in the hope of reversing a falling birth rate. However, single mothers remain unrecognized.

“There has never been a change in the policy,” said a Shanghai maternity hotline agent when he was reached by phone. “Single mothers never met the requirements.”

Ms. Zou, who found out she was pregnant after breaking up with her boyfriend, said she would continue to fight for recognition even though she didn’t need the money.

“This is about the right to vote,” she said. Currently, when an unmarried woman becomes pregnant, “You can either get married or have an abortion. Why not give people the right to a third choice? “

As education levels have risen in recent years, more and more Chinese women have refused marriage, childbirth, or both. According to government statistics, only 8.1 million couples got married in 2020, the lowest number since 2003.

With the rejection of marriage, the recognition of single mothers has increased. There are no official statistics on single mothers, but a 2018 report by the state-sponsored All-China Women’s Federation estimates that there will be at least 19.4 million single mothers in 2020. These included widowed and divorced women.

When Zhang A Lan, a 30-year-old filmmaker, grew up in Central Hebei Province, unmarried mothers were viewed as defiled and sinful, she said. When she decided to give birth without getting married two years ago, it was common for people on social media to question these old stereotypes.

“Marriage is obviously not a prerequisite for childbirth,” said Ms. Zhang, who gave birth to a boy last year.

Yet many women described a persistent gap between attitudes on the Internet and in reality.

Many Chinese are still concerned about the financial burden and social stigma that single mothers face, said Dong Xiaoying, a Guangzhou lawyer who advocates the rights of single mothers and gay couples. Lesbians are also often denied maternity rights because China does not recognize same-sex unions.

Ms. Dong, who wants to have a child out of wedlock herself, said her parents found the decision incomprehensible.

“It’s a bit like getting out of the closet,” said Ms. Dong, 32. “There’s still a lot of pressure.”

However, the biggest obstacles are official.

The authorities have taken some measures to start recognizing the reproductive rights of single women. A representative of the National People’s Congress, China’s legislature, has for years put forward proposals to improve the rights of unmarried women. While authorities have shut down other feminist groups, those who support unmarried mothers have largely escaped control.

The easier contact with authorities may be due, at least in part, to the fact that women’s goals are aligned with national priorities.

China’s birth rate has declined in recent years after decades of one-child policies severely reduced the number of women of childbearing age. Recognizing the threat to economic growth, the government has begun pushing women to have more children. On Monday, she announced that couples would be allowed to have three children. The government’s latest five-year plan, published last year, promised a more “inclusive” birth policy and raised hopes for recognition of unmarried mothers.

A state outlet was recently mentioned in a headline about the original relaxation of politics in Shanghai: “More and more Chinese cities are offering maternity insurance to unmarried mothers in the demographic crisis.”

But the obvious support only goes so far, said Ms. Dong. Far from promoting women’s empowerment, the authorities have recently attempted to pull women out of the workforce and return to traditional gender roles – the opposite of what single motherhood would allow. “From a governance point of view, they don’t really want to open up completely,” she said.

The National Health Commission emphasized this year that family planning is the responsibility of “husbands and wives together”. In January, the Commission rejected a proposal to open up egg freezing to single women, citing ethical and health concerns.

Open rejection of gender norms can still lead to reprisals. Last month, Douban, a social media site, shut down several popular forums where women discussed their desire not to marry or have children. Site moderators accused the groups of “extremism”, according to group administrators.

Shanghai’s U-turn was the clearest example of the authorities’ mixed message on the reproductive rights of unmarried women.

When the city appeared to be expanding maternity benefits earlier this year, officials never specifically mentioned unmarried women. Their announcement simply said that a “family planning review” that required a marriage certificate would no longer be conducted.

In April women were again asked for their marriage certificates when applying online.

“The local administrators don’t want to take responsibility,” said Ms. Dong. “No higher national authority has said that these family planning rules can be relaxed, so they don’t dare to open that window.”

Many women hope that pressures from an increasingly vocal public will make such regulations untenable.

32-year-old Teresa Xu saw this postponement firsthand in 2019 when she filed a lawsuit against China’s ban on freezing eggs for single women. At first, the judge treated her like a “naive little girl,” she said. But when her case found support on social media, officials became more respectful.

Even so, her case is still pending and officials have not given her an update in over a year. Ms. Xu said she was confident in the long run.

“There’s no way of predicting what they’re going to do in the next two or three years,” she said. “But I think there are some things that cannot be denied when it comes to the development and desires of society. There is no way to reverse this trend. “

Joy Dong contributed to the research.

Categories
Business

Right here’s a Solution to Be taught if Facial Recognition Programs Used Your Pictures

As tech companies developed facial recognition systems that quickly resume government surveillance and compromise privacy, they may have received help from an unexpected source: your face.

Corporations, universities, and government laboratories have used millions of images obtained from a variety of online sources to develop the technology. Now researchers have created an online tool called Exposing.AI that allows users to search many of these collections of images for their old photos.

The tool, which compares images from the Flickr online photo-sharing service, provides a glimpse into the vast amounts of data required to build a wide variety of AI technologies, from facial recognition to online chatbots.

“People need to realize that some of their most intimate moments have been armed,” said one of its creators, Liz O’Sullivan, technology director for the Surveillance Technology Oversight Project, a privacy and civil rights group. She helped create Exposing.AI with Adam Harvey, a researcher and artist in Berlin.

Artificial intelligence systems don’t magically get intelligent. They learn by locating patterns in human-generated data – photos, voice recordings, books, Wikipedia articles, and all sorts of other materials. Technology just keeps getting better, but it can learn human prejudices against women and minorities.

People may not know that they are contributing to AI education. For some, that’s a curiosity. For others, it’s hugely scary. And it can be against the law. A 2008 Illinois law, the Biometric Information Privacy Act, imposes financial penalties if the facial scans are used by residents without their consent.

In 2006, Brett Gaylor, a documentary filmmaker from Victoria, British Columbia, uploaded his honeymoon photos to Flickr, a service popular at the time. Almost 15 years later, using an early version of Mr. Harvey’s Exposing.AI, he discovered that hundreds of these photos had invaded multiple data sets that may have been used to train facial recognition systems around the world.

Flickr, bought and sold by many companies over the years and now owned by the photo sharing service SmugMug, allowed users to share their photos under what is known as a Creative Commons license. This license, common on websites, meant that others could use the photos with certain restrictions, although those restrictions may have been ignored. In 2014, Yahoo, which at the time owned Flickr, used many of these photos in a data set that should be helpful when working on Computer Vision.

Mr. Gaylor, 43, wondered how his photos could have jumped from place to place. He was then told that the photos may have contributed to surveillance systems in the US and other countries, and that one of those systems was used to track the Uighur population in China.

“My curiosity turned to horror,” he said.

How honeymoon photos helped build surveillance systems in China is, in some ways, a story of unintended or unexpected consequences.

Years ago, AI researchers at leading universities and technology companies began collecting digital photos from a variety of sources, including photo sharing services, social networks, dating sites like OkCupid, and even cameras installed on college quads. You shared these photos with other organizations.

That was just the norm for researchers. They all needed data to feed into their new AI systems, so they shared what they had. It was usually legal.

One example was MegaFace, a dataset created by professors at the University of Washington in 2015. They were created without the knowledge or consent of the people whose pictures they folded into the huge pool of photos. The professors put it on the Internet for others to download.

MegaFace has been downloaded more than 6,000 times by corporations and government agencies around the world, according to a request by the New York Times for public records. These included US defense contractor Northrop Grumman; In-Q-Tel, the investment arm of the Central Intelligence Agency; ByteDance, the parent company of the Chinese social media app TikTok; and the Chinese surveillance company Megvii.

The researchers built MegaFace for use in an academic competition to advance the development of facial recognition systems. It was not intended for commercial use. But only a small percentage of those who downloaded MegaFace have publicly entered the competition.

“We are unable to discuss third-party projects,” said Victor Balta, a spokesman for the University of Washington. “MegaFace has been taken out of service and MegaFace data is no longer distributed.”

Some of those who downloaded the data used facial recognition systems. Megvii was blacklisted by the Ministry of Commerce last year after the Chinese government used its technology to monitor the country’s Uighur population.

The University of Washington took MegaFace offline in May and other organizations removed other records. However, copies of these files can be anywhere, and they are likely to provide new research.

Ms. O’Sullivan and Mr. Harvey spent years trying to develop a tool that would tell how all this data was used. It was more difficult than expected.

They wanted to accept someone’s photo and use facial recognition to instantly tell that person how often their face was in one of those records. However, they feared that such a tool would be poorly used – by stalkers or by corporations and nation states.

“The potential for harm seemed too great,” said Ms. O’Sullivan, who is also vice president of responsible AI at Arthur, a New York company that helps companies control the behavior of AI technologies.

In the end, they had to limit how users could search the tool and what results it produced. The tool as it works today is not as effective as they would like it to be. However, researchers feared they might not be able to uncover the breadth of the problem without making it worse.

Exposing.AI itself does not use face recognition. Photos are only located if you can already refer to them online, for example with an Internet address. Users can only search for photos that have been posted to Flickr, and they need a Flickr username, tag, or web address that can be used to identify those photos. (This provides the researchers with the right level of security and privacy protection.)

While this limits the utility of the tool, it is still an eye opener. Flickr images make up a significant portion of the facial recognition records that have been circulated across the internet, including MegaFace.

It’s not difficult to find photos that people have a personal relationship with. By simply searching old emails for Flickr links, The Times found photos that, according to Exposing.AI, were used in MegaFace and other facial recognition records.

Some belonged to Parisa Tabriz, a well-known security researcher at Google. She did not respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Gaylor is particularly concerned about what he discovered through the tool because he once believed that the free flow of information on the Internet was largely positive. He used Flickr because it gave others the right to use his photos under the Creative Commons license.

“I now live the consequences,” he said.

His hope – and the hope of Ms. O’Sullivan and Mr. Harvey – is that business and government will develop new standards, guidelines, and laws that will prevent the bulk collection of personal information. He’s making a documentary about the long, winding, and occasionally disruptive journey of his honeymoon photos to shed light on the problem.

Mr. Harvey firmly believes that something has to change. “We have to get rid of these as quickly as possible – before they cause more damage,” he said.