Categories
Health

Dr. Aaron Stern, Who Enforced the Film Rankings Code, Dies at 96

Dr. Aaron Stern, a psychiatrist who established himself as the director of Hollywood’s film ratings agency in the early 1970s as a sentry to moviegoers against carnal imagery and violence, died in Manhattan on April 13th. He was 96 years old.

His death in a hospital was confirmed by his step daughter Jennifer Klein.

As an author, professor and management consultant who has always been fascinated by climbing the corporate ladder, he competed against self-centered studio managers, producers, directors and actors – and provided plenty of content for his 1979 book “Me: The Narcissistic American”.

From 1971 to 1974, Dr. Stern director of self-regulatory classification and scoring administration for the Motion Picture Association of America founded just a few years earlier. It replaced the strictly moralistic production code introduced in the early 1930s and administered censored by Will H. Hays, a Presbyterian deacon and former leader of the National Republican Party.

The new judging panel, which initially struggled to gain credibility, rated films by letter to let moviegoers know in advance how much violence, sexuality and swear words to expect on the screen.

The board’s decision that a film deserves an R rating or is restricted could attract more adults, but would immediately eliminate the pool of unaccompanied moviegoers under the age of 17. An X rating would exclude anyone under the age of 17.

Dr. Stern has rewritten the PG (Parental Guidance) category to include a warning that “some materials may not be suitable for teenagers”. He also tried, but failed, to get rid of the X rating – for the reason, he told the Los Angeles Times in 1972, that it was not the job of the Motion Picture Association to keep people out of theaters. (The X rating was changed to NC-17 in 1990, but its meaning remained unchanged.)

It wasn’t until last year, with the release of Three Christs, a film about hospital patients who believed they were Jesus, that Dr. Stern a film credit (he was one of the 17 producers on the film). However, the lack of on-screen recognition belied the power he wielded as director of the board of directors who screened films privately and then voted on the letter rating to be given.

Even some critics gave the new letter-coded classification the benefit of the doubt in the early 1970s, agreeing that their decisions, unlike those of the old Production Code, were based more on sociology than theology. Still, two young members of the Rating Board, appointed on a one-year scholarship, wrote a scathing criticism of their methodology, published in the New York Times in 1972.

They accused Dr. Stern, for having meddled megalomaniacally, editing scripts before scenes were filmed and then edited, and tolerating gratuitous violence but being puritanical about sex. They alleged, among other things, that he warned Ernest Lehman, director of Portnoy’s Complaint (1972), that the focus on masturbation in the film version of Philip Roth’s novel risked an X rating.

“You can have a love scene But as soon as you start unbuttoning or unzipping you have to cut, ”Dr. Star quoted in The Hollywood Reporter about sex in movies.

The Times article prompted letters in which Dr. Stern has been commended by several directors, including Mr. Lehman, who said that Dr. Stern’s advice actually improved his final cut of “Portnoy’s Complaint”. The Times film critic Vincent Canby sniffed, “If Mr. Lehman was really influenced by Dr. Stern’s advice two years ago, he should sue the doctor for wrongdoing.”

Dr. Stern argued that the scoring system, while imperfect, served multiple goals. Among other things, he said it had repelled even more restrictive definitions of profanity by Congress, the courts and the local authorities; and it warned people of what they found intrusive as mores developed and society became more acceptable.

“Social growth should make the rating system obsolete,” he told the Los Angeles Times.

Aaron Stern was born in Brooklyn on March 26, 1925, to Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe. His father, Benjamin Israel Stern, was a carpenter and his mother, Anna (Fishader) Stern, was a housewife. He grew up in Bensonhurst and Sheepshead Bay and was the youngest of three children and the only one born in the United States.

After graduating from Brooklyn College in 1947, he earned a master’s degree in psychological services and a doctorate in child development from Columbia University and a medical degree from Downstate Health Sciences University, State University of New York.

In addition to his stepdaughter Mrs. Klein, his wife Betty Lee (Baum) Stern survived; two children, Debra Marrone and Scott Stern, from his first marriage, which was divorced; two other stepchildren, Lauren Rosenkranz and Jonathan Otto; and 13 grandchildren.

Dr. Stern was introduced to Jack Valenti, president of the Motion Picture Association, by a Great Neck, NY neighbor, Robert Benjamin, a United Artists executive. He first began to review films for the club and was hired by Mr. Valenti in mid-1971 as head of rating administration.

He left the country in early 1974 to join Columbia Pictures Industries and eventually returned from Los Angeles to New York, where he revived his private practice. He has also taught at Yale, Columbia, New York University, and the University of California, Los Angeles, and was chief operating officer of Tiger Management, a hedge fund and trustee of the Robertson Foundation.

Dr. Stern, a senior educator at Irving Medical Center, New York Presbyterian / Columbia University, and his wife donated $ 5 million in 2019 to award a professorship and fellowship at Weill Cornell Medicine to treat patients with pathological personality disorders. The gift was in gratitude for the care he received during a medical emergency.

Dr. Stern had been interested in narcissism before his trip to Hollywood, but his experience there proved inspiring.

In Me: The Narcissistic American, he wrote that babies are born narcissistic without caring about who they wake up in the middle of the night and that they need to be disciplined as they mature to take others into account.

“When narcissism is about survival, like infancy and country founding,” he wrote, “it’s not as destructive as when one is established, successful and wealthy.”

In 1981, Valenti told The Times that he had “made the mistake of blaming a psychiatrist for the rating system.” Dr. Stern replied, “I am unable to answer that.”

But he had admitted when he was still on the job: “There is no way to sit in this chair and be loved.” He was constantly questioned.

Why should “The Exorcist” (1973) get an R-Rating? (“I think it’s a great movie,” he told director Richard Friedkin. “I’m not going to ask you to cut a frame.”) Why did you originally give Stanley Kubrick’s “A Clockwork Orange” (1971) an X for a ménage à trois filmed at high speed? (“If we did that, any hardcore pornographer could speed up their scenes and rightly ask for an R on the same basis.”) He later helped edit Mr. Friedkin’s “Cruising” as a private consultant for $ 1,000 a day. (1980), on a gay male serial killer for getting an R instead of an X.

“You can only evaluate the explicit elements on the screen – never the morals or the thought problems behind them,” said Dr. Stern 1972. “That is the province of religion, the leaders, the critics and each individual.”

Categories
Business

Maggots, Rape and But 5 Stars: How U.S. Rankings of Nursing Houses Mislead the Public

The pandemic has exposed the shortcomings in the state’s rating system.

State health inspections do little to punish homes with poor records of preventing and controlling infection. According to The Times, from 2017 to 2019 inspectors cited nearly 60 percent – more than 2,000 – of the country’s five-star facilities for failing to follow basic safety precautions such as regular hand washing. Nevertheless, they received top marks.

In San Bernardino, California, inspectors have written to Del Rosa Villa about four different infection control violations. It kept its five stars. Ninety residents at the 104-bed facility contracted the coronavirus and 13 have died.

Del Rosa Villa officials did not respond to requests for comment.

The Life Care Centers of Kirkland, Washington, the first nursing home in the United States to document coronavirus cases, reported poor infection control despite its five stars in 2019. State inspectors wrote it down because they “failed to consistently implement an effective infection control program”.

Thirty-nine residents of the facility have died from Covid-19. The house has 190 beds.

Leigh Atherton, a spokeswoman for Life Care, said the citation was the only infection control flaw that inspectors had found on more than 32 previous visits. She said the house quickly fixed the problem.

If the rating system had worked as intended, it would have provided indications of which houses were most likely to get out of hand and which houses would be likely to get messed up.

That didn’t happen.

The Times noted that there was little correlation between star ratings and the condition of homes during the pandemic. In five-star facilities, the death rate from Covid-19 was only half a percentage point lower than in facilities with lower ratings. And the death rate was slightly lower in two-star facilities than in four-star homes.

The location of a facility, the infection rate in the surrounding community, and the race of nursing home residents were all predictors of whether a nursing home would have an outbreak. The star rating didn’t matter.

Categories
Business

Golden Globes rankings hit all-time low, as present loses two-thirds of viewers

Gregg Donovan holds a sign in support of the Time’s Up Globes movement outside the Beverly Hilton Hotel where the Golden Globes will be held on February 28, 2021 in Beverly Hills, California.

VALERIE MACON | AFP | Getty Images

Not even Tina Fey and Amy Poehler were able to save the Golden Globes from sour ratings on Sunday.

On Tuesday, Nielsen data showed that the Hollywood Foreign Press Association’s 78th annual awards show captured just 6.9 million viewers, a 63% decrease from the 18.4 million viewers hired to air in 2020.

The last time the ceremony reached such a lukewarm audience was in 2008 when the show was turned into a press conference due to the writers’ strike. Around 6 million people saw this program. The least viewed globes, however, were in 1995 when only 3.6 million saw the program.

Sunday’s broadcast was marked by technical problems and overshadowed by scandals as the HFPA came under heavy fire due to the lack of black voters and continued reports of internal corruption. Fey, Poehler, and a number of award winners used their airtime to berate the organization, resulting in an awkward night of pseudo-celebration.

The ceremony was rated 1.5 by adults between 18 and 49 years old, a drastic 68% drop from the previous year’s exhibit, which previously held the record for the lowest ever rating for this important demographic.

NBC, which signed a $ 60 million-a-year deal with HFPA in 2018 to get eight years of exclusive rights to the show, may rethink the value of the ceremony.

While the HFPA used the show on Sunday to make a statement about its plans to include more black journalists and other minority reporters in its organization in the future, many felt the apology fell flat. The organization has grappled with multiple scandals and its reputation has tarnished in the eyes of Hollywood’s elite and audiences around the world.

Nevertheless, the ceremony and its awards remain coveted by the film and television industries. Nominations and wins, even from an organization like the HFPA, are still marketing opportunities for studios and celebrities. Note how often the words “Golden Globe Winner” or “Golden Globe Nominated” are used in trailers and other promotional materials.

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC.

Categories
Business

Fox Information Studies Revenue Achieve, Regardless of Scores Drop

If Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News is at all worried about the recent rating declines, the company has hidden its concerns well. Mr Murdoch’s TV business continues to see sales and earnings growth and reports earnings in both areas in its quarterly report announced on Tuesday.

Fox Corporation, led by Chief Executive, Mr. Murdoch’s son Lachlan Murdoch, saw pre-tax profit jump 17 percent to $ 305 million. In the three months to December, which the company holds for its second fiscal quarter, the company posted an 8 percent increase in revenue to $ 4 billion.

Despite losing its rating crown to CNN in recent weeks, Fox News is still a winning machine. The cable division saw sales jump 1 percent to $ 1.49 billion and pre-tax income up 3 percent to $ 571 million. Advertising rose 31 percent to $ 441 million, but fees paid by cable operators to move the network fell 3 percent to $ 928 million as more people cut the cable.

Lachlan Murdoch trumpeted the cable news network’s performance and downplayed the youngest Decrease in audience numbers.

“The Fox News Channel ended the quarter with the highest average ratings,” he said on an earnings call with analysts. “We are now seeing an expected public retreat since the elections,” a phenomenon he said “in line with previous electoral cycles.” He expects the audience to return to the network at some point.

The company also announced a multi-year renewal contract for Suzanne Scott, the head of the network, to address any concerns that she might be replaced based on the latest rating performance.

“Suzanne’s track record, innovative spirit and commitment to excellence make her the ideal person to continue to lead and grow Fox News,” Lachlan Murdoch said in a statement Tuesday.

The network did not disclose the exact duration or financial terms of the deal.

However, a defamation lawsuit recently filed against Fox Corporation by a little-known technology provider hangs over the company’s financial future. The lawsuit brought by Smartmatic, whose system was used in the Los Angeles County presidential election, seeks at least $ 2.7 billion in damages against Fox Corporation, Fox News and some of its prime-time stars for participating in the conspiracy to lead Defamation and belittling Smartmatic and its voting technology and software, ”the lawsuit said.

Mr Trump and his supporters have repeatedly described the election as “rigged,” and Fox News and its sister network Fox Business have given significant airtime to personalities and anchors who have expressed doubts about the election results. The suit names the Fox anchors Maria Bartiromo, Lou Dobbs and Jeanine Pirro. Mr. Dobbs’ show was abruptly canceled last week, ending his ten year run with the company.

The fine Smartmatic is seeking appears to be an accurate reflection of the profit Fox Corporation is making. For the 2020 calendar year, the company posted pre-tax profits of approximately $ 3.1 billion. Fox recently moved to dismiss the lawsuit.

Fox News is also facing competition from newer media outlets like OANN and Newsmax, which are even further to the right. Fox loyalists appeared to have turned on the network after it scheduled the presidential election for Joseph R. Biden Jr., with some viewers flocking to competitors.

When asked about the declining ratings and the impending battle for his core audience, Mr Murdoch took some time to try to answer the question.

“In the journalism trade, you work out what your market is and produce the best product you can possibly produce,” he said. “At Fox News, Fox News’ success throughout its history has been delivering the absolute best news and opinion for a market we believe is firmly at the center of the right.”

He didn’t seem concerned about the surge in far-right news outlets, which have posted record ratings in the past few weeks.

“We believe that we are aligned exactly where we are aligned with the center right,” he said. “We believe that the Americans are politically there.”

The company’s Fox channels were a significant contributor to growth for the quarter as local channels posted record advertising in politics during the presidential election. The broadcasting division saw advertising dollars rise 10 percent to $ 1.8 billion.

The addition of Tubi, the ad-supported free streaming service Fox acquired last year, also helped boost sales for the TV unit. While it is still a money-losing company, Tubi is expected to double its sales to around $ 300 million for the fiscal year ending June.

Michael Grynbaum contributed to the reporting.