Categories
World News

Threats and Worry Trigger Afghan Girls’s Protections to Vanish In a single day

It took Women for Afghan Women to build Afghanistan’s largest network of women protection services – 32 safe houses, family counseling centers and children’s homes in 14 provinces, which have been grown by word of mouth and driven by the high demand for their services.

They began closing their doors within a few days when the Taliban began their lightning advance through Afghan cities on August 6. Most of the shelter’s managers were packing or burning files, packing up a few belongings, and fling with their customers when news arrived that the Taliban were arriving.

A few directors of Safe Houses – not just those affiliated with Women for Afghan Women, but also a handful of other long-established shelters – chose to stay where they were, but remained silent for fear that everything what they said could cause harm to the women in their care. Nobody takes new cases.

“Our accommodations, our women’s protection centers, are gone. It is very unlikely that we can do most of the work we do for women as we did, ”said Sunita Viswanath, co-founder of Women for Afghan Women.

Even before the Taliban came to power, Afghanistan was at the bottom of every list when it comes to protecting women and at the top of the need for safe shelter, counseling and justice that could help keep women safe.

More than half of all Afghan women reported physical abuse and 17 percent reported sexual violence, while nearly 60 percent had forced marriages instead of arranged marriages, according to studies cited by the Afghan Ministry of Women.

Honor killings, child marriages, the payment of a bride price for a woman, and the practice of baad – trafficking young girls to pay the elders’ debts, which is equivalent to selling a child into slavery – still exist in rural areas . Everywhere, harassment of women in the workplace and in public is a constant, as is psychological abuse, according to recent studies.

As the uprising progressed, the first concern of staff at Women for Afghan Women and others who operate similar shelters was what the Taliban might do to punish them. As the country’s ruler in the 1990s, the Taliban fought vehemently against women traveling alone or gathering.

Relatively new examples of Taliban’s behavior are worrying. When the Taliban briefly took over the city of Kunduz in 2015, the operators and customers of the women’s refuge for Afghan women fled when threatening phone calls came in from the insurgents. The shelter manager described being actively hunted and said she got calls from the Taliban saying they would catch her as an example and hang her in the village square.

But it is not just the fear of the Taliban that is terrifying the shelter operators and their customers this time around. Taliban fighters have come to some of the shelters in the past few weeks. Sometimes they destroyed the site and took over the buildings, but there are still no reports of them causing harm to anyone, said Ms. Viswanath, the group’s co-founder.

“As far as I know, none of our employees have been beaten, attacked or killed,” she said.

Much of the concern stems from the waves of prisoners released during the Taliban’s advance. Among them were men detained under the women’s protection laws that have been enacted with Western support over the past 20 years. The former prisoners hold a grudge not only against the female relative who spoke out against them and publicly humiliated her, but also against all who supported these efforts – the directors of the safe house, advisors and lawyers.

A woman from rural Baghlan Province, who spoke on condition of anonymity for receiving death threats, described how she now changes her place to sleep every few nights. She had previously worked with prosecutors to gather evidence of abuse in cases involving women

Updated

9/2/2021, 5:49 p.m. ET

“After conquering the cities, the Taliban released all prisoners. Among those prisoners were some who were sentenced for my work, ”she said. “Now they are threatening me and there is no government or system to go to and take shelter. I only hide in one place or another. “

The shelters have long been targets. For many in Afghanistan’s strictly patriarchal society – not just the Taliban – a woman who is on her own or abandons her family is often viewed as a prostitute. Some see shelters for abused women as a thin panel for brothels.

In the last 15 years, however, despite the societal antagonism towards the protection of women, more and more people have started looking for shelters. Women, often with terrible injuries – broken bones or internal injuries from severe blows – kept knocking on the unmarked gates or ordinary houses where Relief Society groups took in people.

Whether or not these operations continue is firmly in the hands of the Taliban, who are expected to enact their own laws governing the behavior of women. That will leave the former Afghan government’s law on the elimination of violence against women and other protective measures on an uncertain basis.

For the time being, Taliban officials have given assurances that women are allowed to work and, in some cases, travel without the company of a male relative – “as permitted by Sharia law” or Islamic law. Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid surprised some when, after other Taliban officials urged Afghan women to stay home temporarily for their own safety, he admitted that many in the ranks of the Taliban could not be trusted to be polite and that they should be educated.

Understanding the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan

Map 1 of 6

Who are the Taliban? The Taliban emerged in 1994 amid the unrest following the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989. They used brutal public punishments, including flogging, amputation and mass executions, to enforce their rules. Here is more about their genesis and track record as rulers.

Who are the Taliban leaders? These are the top leaders of the Taliban, men who for years have been on the run, in hiding, in prison and dodging American drones. Little is known about them or how they plan to rule, including whether they will be as tolerant as they say they are. A spokesman told the Times that the group wanted to forget their past but had some restrictions.

But the Taliban made similar statements after taking control of the capital and most of the country in 1996.

“The explanation was that security wasn’t good and they were waiting for security to get better and then women to have more freedom,” said Heather Barr, assistant director of women’s rights at Human Rights Watch. “But in the years they were in power, of course, that moment never came – and I can promise you that the Afghan women who hear this today think that it will never happen this time either.”

For Mahbouba, a longtime activist who has spent much of her life fighting to protect Afghan women, the picture is not yet clear. But she says she gives the Taliban the benefit of the doubt for now. With her claim that everything must be done according to Sharia law because that is the religion of Afghanistan, she has nothing against it.

But the Taliban’s interpretation of Sharia law will also be important, she said.

“We just have to wait and see what happens. The Taliban haven’t really started anything yet – check in in a month, in two months, in six months, ”she said.

Mahbouba, whom the Times identifies by name only to protect her and her organization, oversees a long-standing safe house for women. She hasn’t escaped or closed her doors, but she’s holding back and calibrating what she tells the news media, she said.

When some Taliban recently came into her office and said the women were being held against their will, Mahbouba said she did not let them in but went outside to speak to them.

They told her they heard that “some women are being held here.” She rejected that and instead said she was defending the honor of Afghan women.

“I don’t let them take to the streets to be used and abused by other people; they are the victims of domestic violence, ”she recalls. “So instead of running away and letting you go into prostitution, I have kept your honor and protect you.”

The Taliban appeared to accept this statement, and Mahbouba said she was determined to have a dialogue with them.

But she also made a request: please, she said, “keep watching, and if our world goes crazy and it gets really terrible, we can let people know.”

A New York Times employee contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Justice Division to step up enforcement of voting rights protections

Attorney General Merrick Garland said Friday that the Justice Department will swiftly increase its resources dedicated to enforcing voting rights protections, citing a 2013 decision by the Supreme Court as well as bills being pushed by conservatives across the country that aim to tighten election procedures.

In a speech delivered at the department’s headquarters, Garland said that in the next 30 days he will double the civil rights division’s staff dedicated to protecting the right to vote.

The department, he said, had already begun scrutinizing new laws that he said “seek to curb voter access,” as well as policies and measures that are already on the books.

In particular, Garland said the department was reviewing recent studies that showed that, in some jurisdictions, nonwhite people wait in line much longer than white people to vote.

“To meet the challenge of the current moment, we must rededicate the resources of the Department of Justice to a critical part of its original mission: Enforcing federal law to protect the franchise for all voters,” Garland said.

Garland, a former federal judge, said the department’s new steps were inspired by “a dramatic rise in legislative efforts that will make it harder for citizens to cast a vote that counts.”

“So far this year, at least 14 states have passed new laws that make it harder to vote, and some jurisdictions, based on disinformation, have utilized abnormal post-election audit methodologies that may put the integrity of the voting process at risk and undermine public confidence in our democracy,” Garland said.

The attorney general alluded to a 2020 election recount underway in Arizona’s Maricopa County supported by former President Donald Trump. The Justice Department wrote in a letter last month that the review by the state’s Republican Senate may violate federal law.

“Many of the justifications proffered in support of these post-election audits and restrictions on voting have relied on assertions of material vote fraud in the 2020 election that have been refuted by law enforcement and intelligence agencies of both this administration and the previous one, as well as by every court, federal and state, that has considered them,” Garland said.

He added, “Moreover, many of the changes are not even calibrated to address the kinds of voter fraud that are alleged as their justification.”

Garland has been at pains to emphasize the independence of his Justice Department from President Joe Biden, a Democrat, even as he distances the federal agency from its controversial record under Trump, who at times pushed its lawyers to defend his personal interests. Trump has falsely alleged that his loss in the 2020 election was fraudulent.

In addition to the wave of conservative voting bills in states such as Texas, Georgia and Arizona, Garland also cited a Supreme Court decision from 2013 known as Shelby County v. Holder.

The decision effectively struck down the pre-clearance requirement of the Voting Rights Act, which forced certain jurisdictions with records of discrimination to have election law changes approved by the Justice Department.

Garland recounted that in 1961, then-Attorney General Robert Kennedy called into his office the assistant attorney general for civil rights, Burke Marshall, and Marshall’s first assistant, John Doar.

Before the pre-clearance requirement was signed into law in 1965, Garland said, “the only way to guarantee the right of Black Americans to vote was to bring individual actions in each county and parish that discriminated against them.”

“Kennedy told his assistants that was what he wanted to do,” Garland said. “‘Well, General,’ Burke Marshall replied, ‘if you want that, you’ve got to have a lot more lawyers.'”

“Well, today, we are again without a pre-clearance provision,” Garland said. “So again, the civil rights division is going to need more lawyers.”

In addition to beefing up the staff of the civil rights division, Garland said the Justice Department will publish guidance on post-election audits and on early voting and voting by mail. He said the department will also publish new guidance ahead of the decennial redistricting cycle.

“We will publish new guidance to make clear the voting protections that apply to all jurisdictions as they redraw their new legislative maps,” Garland said.

Garland added that the department, which includes the Federal Bureau of Investigation, will also pursue criminal charges against those who violate federal laws in spreading election disinformation in efforts to suppress the vote.

“We have not been blind to the dramatic increase in menacing and violent threats against all manner of state and local election workers,” Garland said. “Such threats undermine our electoral process and violate a myriad of federal laws.”

The Supreme Court is expected to rule soon in a case over the Voting Rights Act that could have implications for legal challenges against the new voting restrictions. The court has a 6-3 majority of justices appointed by Republicans.

Subscribe to CNBC Pro for the TV livestream, deep insights and analysis.

Categories
Politics

U.S. Grants Momentary Protections to Hundreds of Haitians

The Biden government on Saturday granted special protection to Haitians temporarily residing in the US after being displaced by a devastating 2010 earthquake and reversed efforts by the previous government to force them to leave the country.

The decision, announced by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro N. Mayorkas, keeps President Biden’s election promise to restore a program that will protect thousands of Haitian migrants from the threat of deportation under the restrictive policies established under the President Donald J. Trump.

Mr Mayorkas said the new 18-month term known as Temporary Protection Status would apply to Haitians living in the United States as of Friday.

“Haiti is currently suffering from serious security concerns, social unrest, an increase in human rights abuses, crippling poverty and a lack of basic resources exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic,” Mayorkas said in a statement on Saturday.

The protection created in a 1990 law enables foreigners who have been forced to flee their homes due to natural disasters and conflict to work and live in the United States. Haiti is one of eleven countries to benefit from the program, according to US Citizenship and Immigration Services. The Obama administration granted temporary protection status to Haitians who lived illegally in the US after the 7.0 magnitude earthquake in January 2010.

Senator Robert Menendez, Democrat of New Jersey and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said the new designation could protect up to 150,000 Haitians from returning to the political and security crisis in their home country.

“The last thing our country should do is force an entire community in the US to choose between packing up their lives and tearing up their families through self-deportation, or being undocumented and forced into the shadows of our society,” she said Menendez said in a statement on Saturday.

As part of its tough efforts to curb legal and illegal immigration, the Trump administration sought to end protection for approximately 400,000 immigrants living in the United States, including Haitians. At the time, officials said the emergency conditions that forced immigrants to flee their countries – earthquakes, hurricanes, civil war – had occurred long ago and that most immigrants no longer needed the port provided by the United States.

Lawsuits blocked the cancellations, but in September a federal appeals court joined the Trump administration, alerting hundreds of thousands of immigrants to the need to leave the country or be deported. Many of those affected had lived in the United States for years. The Trump administration agreed to keep protection in place until at least early 2021, which means a new administration could decide to continue the policy.

Immigration advocates have urged the Biden government to restore the temporary designation to Haitians and other immigrants living in the country and welcomed the decision announced on Saturday.

“Better late than never,” wrote the National TPS Alliance, a grassroots organization, on Twitter.

In March, the Biden government issued special protection for up to 320,000 Venezuelans living in the United States, citing the country’s extraordinary humanitarian crisis led by President Nicolás Maduro.

However, some said more needed to be done to allow many of these immigrants to live in the United States permanently.

“Haitians have been living in uncertainty for several months,” said Erika Andiola, chief advocacy officer of the nonprofit Raices, in a statement. “In the future, this could uncertainly be resolved through a permanent solution through laws that put TPS holders on the path to citizenship,” she added, using the acronym for the program.

This month the House passed law to pave the way for citizenship for an estimated four million undocumented immigrants living in the United States, including those granted temporary protection status on humanitarian grounds. The law was passed largely on a partisan basis and getting it through the more even Senate will be a challenge.

Categories
Health

WHO chief urges world to observe U.S., waive Covid vaccine patent protections

World Health Organization (WHO) Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus attends a press conference organized by the United Nations Union of Geneva Correspondents Association (ACANU) during the COVID-19 outbreak on July 3, 2020 at WHO headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland has been.

Fabrice Coffrini | Pool | Reuters

The Director General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, on Friday called on other countries, in particular the Group of the Seven Industrialized Nations, to follow the example of the US and support a request by the World Trade Organization to temporarily waive patent protection for Covid-19 vaccines .

“The US announcement on Wednesday to support a temporary waiver of intellectual property protection for Covid-19 vaccines is an important declaration of solidarity and support for vaccine justice,” Tedros said at a press conference. “I know that this is not easy politically, so I really appreciate the US leadership and we urge other countries to follow suit.”

The USA, which is strongly committed to the enforcement of intellectual property rights around the world, has previously spoken out against the waiver of patent protection for Covid vaccines.

President Joe Biden personally made the decision to change the US stance, White House deputy press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters aboard Air Force One on Thursday. As a presidential candidate, Biden had supported the abandonment of the intellectual property of Covid vaccines.

The Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, whose members include vaccine manufacturers AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson, firmly oppose the Biden government’s decision.

WHO chief Tedros on Friday also called on the G7 industrialized nations – Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Great Britain, as well as the USA – to do more to facilitate the equitable distribution of Covid vaccines worldwide.

“For G-7, vaccines and vaccine equity are now the most important and immediate support we need,” said Tedros. “I think everyone knows what we should do to increase production capacity and then increase vaccination rates in all countries.”

According to the WHO chief, more than 80% of the more than 1 billion Covid vaccine doses distributed worldwide went to high-income countries, while low-income countries received 0.3%.

“That kind of gap is unacceptable,” said Tedros. “It is not only unacceptable on moral grounds, but also because we will not defeat the virus in a divided world.”

“It is in the interests of every country in this world to exchange vaccines and to contribute in every possible way to ensure the justice of the vaccines,” said the WHO chief. “Vaccine equity is not a charity. Vaccine equity is in everyone’s interest.”

The demand for the revocation of patent protection proposed by India and South Africa last October is facing an uphill battle at the WTO, which takes decisions by consensus among its 164 member states.

Germany, Europe’s largest economy, has spoken out against the attempt to temporarily forego vaccination patents. BioNTech, which developed a Covid vaccine in collaboration with Pfizer, is based in Germany.

“The US proposal to lift patent protection for Covid-19 vaccines has a significant impact on vaccine production as a whole,” said a spokesman for the federal government on Thursday. “The limiting factor in vaccine production is the production capacity and high quality standards, not the patents.”

After the US reversal, the governments of Canada, Italy, Japan and Great Britain did not take any clear public positions for or against the renunciation of the protection of intellectual property. French President Emmanuel Macron supported the US position.

The President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, who heads the executive body of the European Union, did not accept the waiver plan and declared in a speech that she was “ready to discuss proposals for effective and pragmatic management of the crisis”.

Russia, which developed the Sputnik vaccine, has expressed support for the move and China is open to further discussion. The WHO announced on Friday that it has approved the emergency vaccine developed by China’s Sinopharm.

According to The Associated Press, which quoted a Geneva-based trade official, around 80 WTO countries, mostly developing countries, have expressed support for the proposal.

“It’s also important to remember that abandoning intellectual property must go hand-in-hand with a transfer of technology and expertise for these elusive vaccines,” said Tedros.

Categories
Health

U.S. to debate wider distribution, India calls to waive patent protections

Ground staff unload coronavirus disease (COVID-19) supplies from the United States at the cargo terminal of Indira Gandhi International Airport on April 30, 2021 in New Delhi, India.

Prakash Singh | Reuters

WASHINGTON – White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain said Sunday that the Biden government plans to distribute the coronavirus vaccine to India and other countries after millions of Americans received their doses.

In the past few weeks, India has been grappling with a staggering surge in new coronavirus infections. Over the weekend, India reported 400,000 cases a day for a cumulative total of 19,557,457 cases. This is evident from numbers compiled by Johns Hopkins. The spike may have been triggered by a highly contagious variant of Covid known as B.1.617, which was first identified in the country.

The variant has since been identified in other countries, including the United States.

On Friday, the White House announced it would limit travel from India as the country works to counter the rise in Covid-19 infections.

“We are rushing to help India,” said Klain during an interview on CBS’s Face the Nation program.

Klain said the US has sent therapeutics, rapid diagnostic test kits, ventilators and protective equipment to the world’s largest democracy, as well as raw materials that are vital to vaccine production.

“Our US Trade Representative, Katherine Tai, will go to the WTO next week to begin talks on how we can further distribute, license and distribute this vaccine,” he said when asked if the Biden administration would protect patents The coronavirus vaccine would loosen up.

Klain added that he expected the White House to have more to say on the matter in the coming days.

Earlier this month, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi discussed with Biden about the revocation of patent protection for the coronavirus vaccine. The relaxation would give governments faster and more affordable access to the life-saving doses.

Last week, the Biden government announced that it would immediately provide the raw materials needed to manufacture coronavirus vaccines in India. The US response came after Britain, France and Germany pledged aid to India, the world’s largest democracy. Rich nations have come under fire in the past few days for hoarding the raw materials needed for the shots.

Categories
Politics

Justice Dept. Seeks to Pare Again Civil Rights Protections for Minorities

The Trump administration has long sought to remove protections for groups at risk of such effects, arguing that the civil rights law passed by Congress only protects against willful acts of discrimination.

The administration had taken legal objections from conservative allies, including the influential Heritage Foundation, and placed the ordinance on a list of anti-discrimination laws advocated by the Obama administration, whose provisions it would revise after President Trump won a second term.

“Federal agencies are full of guidelines that take the multiple impact approach and the Trump administration needs to stamp them out,” wrote Roger Clegg, former president and general counsel of the Center for Equal Opportunity, a conservative think tank, in The National Review Year 2018.

The Trump administration has already signaled its objections to the concept and has taken steps to undermine it.

In 2017, the government closed a complaint from civil rights groups, including the NAACP Legal Protection and Education Fund, on the grounds that Republican Governor Larry Hogan’s cancellation of a major transportation project in Maryland called Red Line violated civil rights Act, because it disproportionately hurts the city’s black residents. The transportation department put the complaint, which opened on the last day of the Obama administration, on hold with no result or explanation.

The ordinance’s fiercest condemnation came in 2018, when the Trump administration essentially accused an Obama-era guidance document addressing the disproportionate disciplinary rates among black children in the U.S. for the mass shooting of a troubled white student in Parkland Fla.

Trump administration officials tried extensively to tie the document to the doctrine of different effects. In the days leading up to the revocation of the document by the Ministries of Education and Justice in December 2018, a federal school safety commission, led by Education Minister Betsy DeVos, published a report recommending that the guidelines be withdrawn because they are “based on different legal theory , but this theory lacks a foundation in applicable law. “It called the reading of the document of the law” at best dubious “.