Categories
Health

California is requiring proof of Covid vaccination for state staff

Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images

California will require government employees and some health care workers to provide evidence of Covid-19 or undergo mandatory weekly tests, senior state officials said Monday.

According to a press release, government officials are required to submit records of their vaccination by August 2. All civil servants who have not been vaccinated by then must present a negative Covid test at least once a week.

The new policy for health workers and convention facilities goes into effect on August 9, and health facilities must be fully complied with by August 23, according to the press release.

In government health care facilities, employees who work in a hospital are required to show evidence of a Covid vaccine or show negative coronavirus tests twice a week. Unvaccinated people are advised to wear N95 masks while working. Medical staff in outpatient facilities such as dental practices also have to do a Covid test once a week.

“We are at a point in this epidemic of this pandemic where the choice, the individual’s decision not to be vaccinated, is now profound, devastating and deadly on the rest of us,” Governor Gavin Newsom said at the announcement new arrangement. “This election has led to an increase in the number of cases, growing concerns about rising mortality rates and apparently induced hospitalizations.”

While the state already requires employees to disclose whether they have been vaccinated if they do not wish to wear masks indoors, they do not need to provide proof of vaccination. The new guidelines require proof of vaccination for all civil servants and mandatory tests for those who do not provide proof.

“Our projections are sobering,” said Newsom, noting that state officials are forecasting a “significant increase in hospital admissions” over the next few weeks that will put pressure on local hospitals.

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio recently introduced similar guidelines for city and health workers, NBC New York reported. All employees who fail to provide proof of vaccination by September 13 are required to have a weekly coronavirus test, and all unvaccinated employees must wear a mask at work starting August 2.

The San Francisco Bar Owner Alliance, which represents 500 bars in San Francisco, said it is encouraging its members to require customers to have a negative Covid test or proof of vaccination from July 29, requirements are “welcome to sit outside.” The individual bars have a choice of whether to enforce the requirements or not.

California saw vaccination rates rise 16% last week as the Delta variant quickly spread across the state. It now makes up about 80% of all newly sequenced cases in the state, health officials said.

Los Angeles County recently redesigned its indoor mask mandate regardless of vaccination status.

When asked about a statewide mask mandate, Newsom said the majority of Californians live in jurisdictions that either mandate or encourage the use of masks. “Our focus is on vaccinations, so there won’t be a need.” he said.

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs also announced Monday that it will require Covid vaccinations for all health care workers who work in Veterans Health Administration facilities.

“VA is taking this necessary step to protect the veterans it serves,” the agency wrote on its website. It is the first federal agency to mandate vaccinations and give employees eight weeks to get their vaccinations.

Categories
Health

Most U.S. corporations would require proof of Covid vaccination from workers: survey

A healthcare worker fills out a Covid-19 vaccination card in the Bronx, New York.

Angus Mordant | Bloomberg | Getty Images

According to a new survey by Arizona State University with the support of the Rockefeller Foundation, more than 60% of businesses in the US require proof of vaccination from their employees.

A large majority of US employers, 65%, plan to incentivize employees to get vaccinated, and 63% need proof of vaccination, according to the survey. Overall, 44% require all employees to be vaccinated, 31% only encourage vaccinations, and 14% require some employees to be vaccinated.

Regarding the consequences of not complying with the company’s vaccination policy, 42% of companies said the employee was not allowed to return to the physical work environment, and 35% said disciplinary action, including possible termination, was on the table.

The poll, released Thursday, represents the responses from 957 facilities in 24 industries in the United States. Most of the respondents were companies with 250 or more employees.

Tests are still crucial for employers. 70% of respondents are currently doing Covid tests, most of which are mandatory.

When it comes to employee wellbeing, company respondents said burnout increased by 54% and overall mental health concerns increased by 59%. However, morale and productivity also increase by almost 50%.

Looking ahead, 66% of employers plan to allow workers to work from home full-time by 2021 and 73% plan to offer flexible working arrangements when the pandemic is over. However, 73% of companies want employees to work from the office for at least 20 hours a week.

“This is not just a bubble going ‘back to normal’. There will be some positive flexibility after the pandemic ends, and we will be back to work personally,” said Mara G. Aspinall, a professor at the College of Arizona State University Health Solutions and one of the authors of the survey.

According to the survey, employees are primarily concerned about their personal health, the risk of infection, and workplace safety. 38 percent of employees want to return at some point, but not immediately, and about a quarter said they don’t want to return at all, according to the companies that responded to the survey.

“The pandemic has changed the traditional office environment in many ways, possibly forever, but the majority of employers say they see real value in having employees continue to interact face-to-face,” said Nathaniel L. Wade, Co-author of the study, which is also affiliated with ASU’s College of Health Solutions. “We really wanted to make sure we were giving public information so people could make good decisions.”

Most employees, around 51%, would prefer to wait until the government or health authorities allow them to return to work, and around 47% said they would return to personal work once the entire workforce is vaccinated.

“Employers have been relatively calm during the pandemic. We are now entering the next phase where employers will create their own guidelines so that employees can return to work safely and sustainably,” said Aspinall. “People want to get back to normal, but they want to do it safely.”

Categories
Health

Will I would like proof of vaccine to journey overseas?

As the adoption of vaccinations gains momentum around the world, attention is now turning to vaccines of a different kind: vaccination records.

Last week, the International Air Transport Association announced the launch of its new digital passport as a “way forward” for the resumption of quarantine-free international travel.

The app, which is being tested by 30 airlines, enables governments and airlines to collect, access and share encrypted information related to the passengers’ Covid-19 test and vaccination status before departure.

The International Chamber of Commerce and the World Economic Forum have developed similar apps – ICC AOKpass and CommonPass – that travelers can use to electronically document their medical status. Countries like Denmark and Sweden are introducing their own health passports, and even tech giants want to join.

What are digital health passes and will they allow a return to heaven this year?

What is a vaccination certificate?

A vaccination card, also known as a digital health card, is digital documentation that a person has been vaccinated against a virus, in this case Covid.

Stored on a phone or digital wallet, the data is usually presented as a QR code and can also indicate whether a person has tested negative for a virus.

Digital health passports are tested to validate people’s Covid-19 test and vaccination status.

Maskot | Getty Images

Such documentation is not unprecedented. For decades, people traveling to certain countries have had to show physical “yellow cards” as proof of vaccination against diseases such as cholera, yellow fever and rubella.

However, this is the first time the industry has advocated an electronic alternative to improve auditability and bypass some of the delays caused by paper peers.

“Imagine the scene when 180,000 people present a piece of paper that needs review and validation,” said Mike Tansey, general manager at Accenture, referring to the number of daily passengers at Changi Airport in Singapore prior to Covid.

Do we need digital health passes to travel?

Tansey, who leads Accenture’s APAC Travel and Hospitality division, has worked with several major airlines on their digital health passport strategies, including three in the US and several in the Asia-Pacific region.

He told CNBC’s Global Traveler that these plans have “accelerated” since the vaccine was launched, and the need for such IDs is clear to him.

The obvious answer is yes we do.

Mike Tansey

General Manager, Travel and Hospitality, Accenture

“The obvious answer is’ yes,” Tansey said when asked if we would need digital health cards to resume the trip.

He called debates a “red herring”.

“Governments may not say you have to have one, but the effects of not will be so ridiculous that travel isn’t worth it,” he said, referring to extensive testing and “draconian” quarantines.

What are the security concerns?

Tansey is not alone. Other experts agree that digital health passes are the fastest, most effective way to resume international travel.

Jase Ramsey, professor of management at Florida Gulf Coast University’s Lutgert College of Business, agreed that the likelihood of adoption was “very high”. However, he noted that concerns about security and personal information could make consumers less willing to use digital health passports than their physical alternatives.

“As with any app that stores health records, there are privacy and fraud concerns,” said Ramsey.

Vaccination records electronically store medical information that is displayed as a QR code.

da-kuk | E + | Getty Images

Accredify is a Singapore-based document accreditation firm whose technology is used as part of the Singapore government mandated Covid-19 pre-travel health screening. It is claimed that the appeal of digital accreditation systems – like its own, which is based on the blockchain – is that they are tamper-proof and therefore cannot be forged.

“Medical documents that are privately and securely stored in the app are only accessible to users, so they can decide who and when to share their medical records with,” a spokesman said via email.

Traveler resistance can be overrated. A recent study by travel news website The Vacationer found that 73.6% of Americans surveyed would use a Covid health pass or app so airlines and border agencies can check their vaccination status and test results.

What are the challenges for health passports?

The success of digital health passports depends on the effectiveness of vaccines. Little is known about whether vaccines prevent the spread of Covid, although research is currently being carried out.

The World Health Organization has urged caution with health cards and urged the authorities and tour operators not to introduce proof of vaccination as a condition for international travel.

The effectiveness of vaccines in preventing transmission is not yet clear and global vaccine supplies are limited.

speaker

World health organization

“This is because the effectiveness of vaccines in preventing transmission is not yet clear and global vaccine supplies are limited,” said a WHO spokesman.

Coordinating the various existing and pending vaccination records in the market and ensuring that users’ certifications are linked to verified and approved medical facilities will prove to be a major challenge.

“For vaccine passports to be an internationally practical tool, there must be a standardized platform that crosses all borders – like the current passport system,” said Dr. Harry Severance, Assistant Professor at Duke University School of Medicine.

WHO works with agencies such as the International Air Transport Association and the International Civil Aviation Organization to develop standards for digital vaccination cards. It added that its position on health passports “will evolve as the evidence for existing and new Covid-19 vaccines is updated”.

What about the social impact?

Add to this, of course, the social, legal and political implications of a system based on unequal global access to vaccines and technology.

According to the WHO, around 3.6 billion people worldwide cannot access the Internet and more than 1.1 billion cannot officially prove their identity. For many, paper IDs remain essential.

Access to vaccinations is still far from fair around the world

Luis Alvarez | DigitalVision | Getty Images

“People from different countries, regions or communities may not have access to vaccines or Covid-19 tests,” said Dr. Sharona Hoffman, a bioethics professor at Case Western Reserve University’s School of Medicine, noting that low-income countries may not get vaccinations until 2023 or beyond. “Policies that prevent them from traveling or using other services could be discriminatory and exacerbate socio-economic disparities.”

Such systems could also set a precedent for other groups that are also eager to reopen, such as B. Restaurants and Event Venues. In fact, Israel has already created a “green passport” to give vaccinated citizens access to public venues.

This week, some US states decided to lift mask mandates, which could exacerbate this problem.

“As one community moves in this direction, many, many more will follow. As decisions like this are made across the country, you may find that ‘carding’ vaccines becomes the standard,” Severance said.

What could this mean for the future of travel?

Ultimately, resumption of international travel will depend as much on countries’ willingness to reopen as it does on existing travel verification technology.

In the Asia-Pacific region, where borders remain largely closed to tourists, governments may lean towards bilateral agreements or “travel bubbles” with select neighbors before opening further, Accenture’s Tansey said.

An internationally recognized system of health passports … will potentially enable us to survive an impending pandemic.

Harry Severance

Duke University School of Medicine

“The The reality … is that we are six months away from meaningful air travel, “he said.” Agreements are only made with one or two locations at a time. “

However, with much of the technology in place and society moving towards an increasingly digitized future, today’s developments in digital health passports could better prepare the travel industry – and society – for potential turmoil.

“As we evolve into an internationally recognized system of monitoring health passports (or) etc, it will be a facet of a downstream preparedness system that may allow us to survive an impending pandemic that may have worse dynamics than Covid- 19. ” “said Severance.

Categories
Business

China Has All It Must Vaccinate Hundreds of thousands, Besides Proof Its Vaccines Work

Hospitals across China have almost everything that is needed for mass vaccination: millions of doses. Refrigerators to store them. Health care workers trained to manage them.

Anything but evidence that one of their vaccines is working.

Unlike their Western competitors, the Chinese companies have not released late-stage clinical trial data showing whether their vaccines are effective, and regulatory agencies in China have not officially approved them.

This hasn’t stopped local governments across the country from launching an ambitious vaccination campaign. The aim is to vaccinate 50 million people – roughly the population of Colombia – before the New Year holidays by mid-February, when hundreds of millions of people are expected to travel.

China, where the virus first emerged a year ago, will be making great – and scientifically unorthodox – efforts to prevent the outbreak from recurring. Although Beijing has not officially announced the vaccination target, the government has signaled that the rollout will be similar to the outbreak, through a top-down approach that can mobilize thousands of workers to produce the shots, too send and manage. Local officials were told that the trip was a “political mission”.

The campaign will focus on what China calls ‘key priority groups’ including doctors, hotel workers, border control personnel, Food warehouse and transport workers and travelers. Irene Zhang, a 24-year-old college student, received a vaccine in Hangzhou on December 22nd before going to graduate school in the UK next month.

“Because my situation is pretty urgent and all the students around me going abroad have accepted it, I think it is relatively reliable,” said Ms. Zhang.

Even before this current campaign, more than a million people had lined up for vaccinations, confusing scientists who warned that taking undetected vaccines poses potential health risks. Their efforts, which are now larger in scope, are similarly implemented on an ad hoc basis.

The southern province of Guangdong has 180,000 people – mostly workers who are involved with food Storage and transportation, quarantine facilities and border controls – had been vaccinated by December 22nd. 281,800 people had been vaccinated in eastern Zhejiang Province. In Wuhan, where the outbreak was first discovered, the government said it had designated 48 vaccination clinics for its emergency program that began Thursday.

China, which is testing five vaccines in phase 3 studies, has not provided any information from this final phase to prove the effectiveness of these vaccines. In contrast, the United States and Great Britain began vaccination after reviewing and approving such experimental data.

Instead, Chinese officials have made extensive statements with few details to reassure the public that the vaccines are safe and effective. Three of the vaccines are only approved for emergency use. Last month, Liu Jingzhen, the chairman of Sinopharm, a state-owned vaccine maker that has two vaccines in late studies, said none of the roughly 1 million people vaccinated so far had side effects and that “few had mild symptoms.”

The dates and approval are expected to be available within weeks. While there have been promising signs, there are limitations.

The UAE and Bahrain said this month that a vaccine made by Sinopharm was effective, although they provided few details on how the conclusions were drawn. Turkey said a vaccine from Sinovac, a private vaccine maker based in Beijing, had an efficacy rate of 91.25 percent, a result based on preliminary results from a small clinical study. Officials in Brazil said the Sinovac vaccine had an efficacy rate of over 50 percent but had postponed the publication of detailed data.

The extent and speed of the vaccination campaign are the result of a centralized public health infrastructure in an authoritarian system. During the crisis, China showed how it can mobilize thousands of workers to reach millions of people. it tested 11 million people in 10 days in Wuhan.

Updated

Apr. 29, 2020, 6:59 p.m. ET

Chinese vaccine manufacturers have worked to increase production, both for the country’s own needs and for global exports. The Chinese government has promised to produce 610 million cans by the end of the year and expects to produce more than a billion cans in the next year.

“If they say 50 million, they probably will,” said Jennifer Huang Bouey, a senior policy researcher at RAND Corporation and an epidemiologist. “The question is how much it would cost and what effect that would have.”

The whole effort took months of preparation. Since June, hospitals in Guangdong Province have started building vaccination clinics, equipping them with refrigerators and installing cold storage systems.

Sinopharm was doing exercises this month. During the test run, workers loaded boxes of the vaccines and ice packs, while the company official tracked the temperature of the vaccines in real time as they were shipped.

China has some advantages in introducing it. Unlike the Pfizer vaccine, the vaccines made by Sinopharm and Sinovac are based on traditional methods that use inactivated or weakened forms of the virus, making them easier to store and distribute.

But the pitfalls are numerous, as the US experience has shown. in the In the United States, just over two million people have received Covid-19 vaccine, well below the government’s 20 million target for this month. Hospitals had to prepare the frozen shots and find staff to occupy the clinics.

While China was preparing, local officials asked the number of people in the “key priority groups”. According to a government document from Xinchang County in Zhejiang Province, they had to “make sure there were no omissions.”

As recently as two months ago, it seemed that demand might exceed supply. The eastern city of Yiwu had offered 500 cans that were used within a few hours.

Ms. Zhang, the student, said She had initially hesitated about getting vaccinated because everyone around her told her to “wait and see”. Nevertheless, she tried to register in Yiwu, but could not secure a place.

Then on December 21st, Ms. Zhang heard that Hangzhou was launching its own vaccination campaign. She took a bullet train that evening and signed a lease with her friend in town because local authorities required proof of residence. The next day, she paid $ 35 and was shot by Sinovac.

According to Ms. Zhang, four or five people were waiting for the vaccine in the hospital. The process took an hour. This included registering, getting the shot, and waiting 30 minutes to see if any side effects occurred.

“Everything was very calm and tidy,” she said. Before she left, the doctor warned her: don’t shower. Don’t stay up late. Do not eat foods that may irritate your stomach.

The government has emphasized that the vaccination campaign is voluntary and that people have to pay for the vaccinations. Yanzhong Huang, a senior fellow on global health at the Council on Foreign Relations and a health care expert in China, noted that the two-dose regime could cost about $ 70, making it inaccessible to the rural poor.

China may also have trouble convincing people to take the vaccine. Scientists warn that the lack of transparency could spark fears about taking a new vaccine, especially in an industry with a history of quality scandals.

Tao Lina, a vaccine expert and former immunologist at the Shanghai Center for Disease Control and Prevention, said he knew several health care workers who turned down the shots. “In the minds of doctors, they believe that any drug that fails Phase 3 trials is unreliable,” Tao said.

Mr. Tao, who received a Sinopharm vaccine Monday, said he was confident the vaccines were safe and effective, reiterating officials’ comments that there had been no reports of serious side effects. But he added that companies could do better with their news.

“If you say it’s safe, you should come up with all kinds of evidence to show it’s safe,” he said.

Hminem Zhang, a 27-year-old sales rep at an internet company, said he wanted to get vaccinated because he had traveled to work and feared that the virus could reappear if the virus recurs. But he is concerned about the ones made in China because “not many people received them,” he said.

“I would like to wait a month or two for some official data to be released,” said Mr. Zhang, who is from Chongqing, southwestern town. “And then if there’s no news about side effects, I’ll get a chance.”

Liu Yi, Amber Wang, and Elsie Chen contributed to the research.