Categories
World News

China’s growing older inhabitants is greater downside than ‘one-child’ coverage: Economists

A medical worker takes care of a newborn baby lying in an incubator at Jingzhou Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital on the eve of Chinese New Year, the year of the ox, on February 11, 2021 in Jingzhou, Hubei Province.

Huang Zhigang | Visual China Group | Getty Images

BEIJING – China’s decade-long one-child policy attracted renewed attention in recent weeks after authorities gave mixed signals as to whether they were any closer to lifting limits on the number of children people can have.

The authorities have withdrawn the controversial one-child policy in recent years to give people the opportunity to have two children. However, economists say other changes are needed to spur growth as births decline and China’s population ages rapidly.

“There are two ways to address this. One way is to loosen birth control. Something (that) helps on the verge, but even if you loosen control completely it is likely to be difficult to reverse the trend,” said Zhiwei Zhang, Chief Economist at Pinpoint Asset Management.

“The other way to deal with it from an economic policy perspective is to make industry more dependent on other sectors,” he said.

China’s economy has relied heavily on industries such as manufacturing, which require large amounts of cheap labor. However, rising wages make Chinese factories less attractive, while workers need higher skills to make the country more innovative.

The bigger problem for China is that an aging population feeds into an existing problem: slower labor productivity growth, said Alicia Garcia-Herrero, Natixis’ chief economist for the Asia-Pacific region. She watches whether China will grow faster in capital-intensive sectors, which can be attributed more to investments in automation.

Births will fall by 15% in 2020

China introduced its one-child policy in the late 1970s to curb population growth. According to official figures, the country had doubled in size from more than 500 million people in the 1940s to over 1 billion in the 1980s.

Over the next 40 years, the population grew by only 40% – to 1.4 billion, more than four times the US today.

I don’t think the easing of birth policies could have much economic repercussions as the slow population growth is not due to political restrictions, not in the last 20 years.

Dan Wang |

Chief Economist Hang Seng China.

Similar to other major economies, high housing and education costs in China have deterred people from having children in recent years.

Despite a change in 2016 that allowed families to have two children, births fell for the fourth year in a row in 2020, falling 15% to 10 million, according to analysis of a public safety report.

“In general, I don’t think the birth policy easing could have a big economic impact as the slow population growth is not due to political restrictions, not in the last 20 years,” said Dan Wang, Shanghai chief economist at Hang Seng China.

She said, based on the experience of other countries, the most effective policy for a country the size of China would be to accept more migrants, but that would be an unlikely change in the short term.

Other options that policymakers are already pursuing include raising the retirement age, improving the skills of the existing workforce through more education, and using more machines and artificial intelligence to replace human workers, Wang said.

Policy changes are only a matter of time

The one-child policy received renewed attention last month when the National Health Commission issued a statement authorizing research into the economic benefits of lifting restrictions on birth in a northeastern region. The three-province area known as Dongbei has economic problems and the lowest birth rates in the country.

Two days later, the commission issued another statement saying that, despite much online speculation, the news was not a test for the complete repeal of family planning policy.

However, according to economists polled by CNBC, lifting the limits is likely only a matter of time.

Yi Fuxian, critic of the one-child policy and author of “Big Country with an Empty Nest,” said he expected a decision by the end of the year after China released census results once in a decade in April.

Challenges posed by China’s aging population

The Chinese government has also stated that implementing a strategy to respond to an aging population will be a priority for its next five-year plan, which will be formally approved at a parliamentary session starting this week.

Meanwhile, the generations born before the one-child policy was implemented in the 1980s are becoming a significant segment. Over the next 10 years, 123.9 million more people will be entering the age bracket of 55 and over. This is the largest demographic increase among any age group, according to Morgan Stanley.

This demographic shift will create its own economic demands, said Liu Xiangdong, deputy director of the economic research department at the China Center for International Economic Exchanges in Beijing.

Liu said more workers are needed to care for the elderly, while retirement communities and other infrastructures tailored to an older population will see greater demand.

Categories
Business

Huge Tech’s Subsequent Huge Drawback Might Come From Folks Like ‘Mr. Sweepy’

Private lawsuits follow state ones for one simple reason: regulators have a distinct advantage when it comes to obtaining evidence. Federal and state investigators can collect internal documents and interview executives before filing a lawsuit. As a result, their complaints are filled with inside knowledge of the companies. Individuals cannot seek this type of evidence until they have filed lawsuits.

If the government cases against Google or Facebook are successful in the process, the win will likely strengthen the case for private lawsuits, experts said. Lawyers could point these victories as evidence the company broke the law and quickly move on to their main goal: obtaining monetary damages.

The people bringing the cases against the tech giants include publishers, advertisers and users.

Sweepstakes Today, the website operated by Mr. McDaniel brings together prize competitions from across the country. The proceeds will come from advertising that is partially being sold by Google, according to Mr McDaniel’s lawsuit seeking class action status.

The website had annual sales of around $ 150,000 for years and made a profit, according to the complaint. But revenue has been down since 2012, a drop due to Google’s dominance in online advertising.

Mr. McDaniel, who describes some of his public messages as “Mr. Sweepy, ”he said on a GoFundMe page he set up to cover the cost of running the site, that his income“ fell like a rock ”and that he could go out of business. He said Google also hurt his revenue by listing his website as an online gambling venue, which resulted in lower quality ads.

“With Google literally taking over the Internet, it is nearly impossible for companies to do business in this space without using a Google service, which makes them subject to Google’s arbitrary rules and guidelines,” said John Herman, attorney at Mr. McDaniel, in a statement.

Other publishers that have recently filed antitrust complaints against Google include the Lyrics website Genius, which sued Google in 2019, citing the use of Genius Lyrics data in search results to dismiss the case, and the progressive magazine The Nation. Both are among the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed by Boies Schiller Flexner law firm seeking class action status. Another well-known law firm, Berger Montague, has also filed a complaint against Google on behalf of the publishers.

Categories
Business

Marjorie Taylor Greene presents ‘a major problem for the GOP,’ Republican strategist says

Republican strategist Evan Siegfried told CNBC that Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga. and “their hideous views pose a serious problem for the GOP” as the House of Representatives prepares to vote on Thursday on a resolution to remove Greene’s committee duties.

“You don’t just force that [Republican] To say party whether they agree with them or not, but they are a gift to Biden and the Democrats because they don’t allow Republicans to effectively communicate their message against President Biden’s agenda, “said Siegfried, the author of “GOP GPS: How to Find the Millennials and Urban Voters the Republican Party needs to survive. “

The move to remove Greene from the committee’s duties comes amid widespread criticism of a number of extreme remarks she made prior to winning her congressional seat, including pointing out that school shootings like the one at Sandy Hook took place in 2012 and a parkland survivor were mocked.

Minority chairman Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Released a statement Wednesday condemning Greene’s earlier comments but said the decision to remove them from committees was a distraction from Congress.

“The Democrats are resolving to raise the temperature by taking the unprecedented step to advance their partisan takeover of the other party’s committee assignments,” McCarthy said.

Siegfried told The News with Shepard Smith that McCarthy and the Republicans missed an opportunity because they did nothing.

“Leader McCarthy and the House GOP have given up their responsibilities by saying that they will now let the whole House decide their fate,” said Siegfried. “It shouldn’t be difficult to take action against someone with morally disgusting views.”

On Wednesday, the Democrats in the House Rules Committee gave the go-ahead for the vote, saying they had to act because Republicans didn’t take action.

House majority leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Tweeted after speaking with minority leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. “”

Greene took advantage of the Democrats’ actions and began fundraising Tuesday based on allegations that she was wrongly aligned with her beliefs. She tweeted that she has since raised $ 160,000 for her efforts.

Democratic strategist Eric Koch told The News with Shepard Smith that Democrats shouldn’t worry that their opposition may benefit Greene’s grassroots.

“Marjorie Taylor Greene is a dangerous Q-anon conspiracy theorist and must be held accountable for her extremist, anti-Semitic views and the trauma she has brought on survivors of violence,” said Koch. “Democrats shouldn’t worry what their base might think of this.”

Speaking at the rules committee hearing, senior Oklahoma Republican Tom Cole said he was concerned that allowing Democrats to unilaterally take action against a legislature in another party would set a dangerous precedent.

Committee chairman Jim McGovern, D-Mass. Said it was okay to set a precedent for a member to advocate violence against his colleagues. “If that’s not why I don’t know what the hell is,” said McGovern.

Koch said, “If the Republicans would rather side with someone who thinks the parkland shooting is a joke or if Jewish space lasers set off forest fires, that’s their choice.”

The vote will force Republicans to put on record whether Greene should be reprimanded for her earlier comments.

Siegfried predicted that GOP officials “will be praised by the media and loathed by the grassroots, and as a result many will see them as part of the” establishment “and somehow personally against them.”

Siegfried added that Republican elected officials looked away from many of Trump’s “absurdities” believing the party would return to its pre-Trump era once he was out of office.

“They didn’t expect the grassroots not to want to go back there, and they also voted for pro-Trump officials who will continue to advocate what can only be described as insane and morally disgusting views.”

A parallel drama also played out in the house with Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wy. Supporters of former President Donald Trump want to remove Cheney from her No. 3 leadership position for supporting Trump’s impeachment for inciting insurrection

Siegfried said the debate among Republicans in the House about keeping Cheney signals to him that the grassroots Trump had created has not changed.

“They will be present for years to come, promoting individuals and ideas that are more like Greene than Rep. Cheney,” Siegfried said.

A source told NBC News that Cheney refused to apologize for the charges against Trump during an allegedly noisy GOP meeting in camera.

Koch said the move against Cheney showed that “the Republican Party is Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene’s party”.

Categories
Business

The Sperm Kings Have a Downside: Too A lot Demand

There have always been infertile heterosexual couples in need of donor sperm, but with the legalization of gay marriage and the rise of single motherhood, the market has expanded over the past decade. About 20 percent of Spermabanken’s customers are heterosexual couples, 60 percent are gay women and 20 percent are single mothers.

To meet that demand, men provided sperm at a constant rate for years, some banks said. But the coronavirus has changed things. Existing donors were afraid to enter. New donor registrations were halted for months during the lockdown and never really recovered at some banks. Several banks said they had a lot of old frozen semen in store, but that it could only last that long.

“Donor recruitment is a growing challenge,” said Scott Brown, vice president of strategic alliances at California Cryobank. “And I would definitely say that people are still very interested in having children.”

Lots of people want smart sperm too. This is why some major banks are near elite colleges. They have sperm collection centers in Palo Alto, California, near Stanford University and in Cambridge, Massachusetts, near Harvard. College men are one of the most reliable groups in realizing the potential chaos of creating about 50 biological kids around the world for about $ 4,000 over several months – and deciding that this is good business is.

A donor would typically go to a bank once or twice a week for months to produce enough sperm to sell to dozens of families.

“Much of their recruitment revolves around fraternities, but fraternities don’t come together,” said Rosanna Hertz, chairwoman of women and gender studies at Wellesley College and co-author of Random Families, a book on donor conception. “People want college degree semen, so to speak.”

So the banks became desperate. A recruiter told me that she had started advertising on outdoor paths since the gyms closed. A sales representative from another sperm bank said he hoped management could offer cash rewards to attract donors, but his bosses were concerned about setting a precedent.