Categories
Politics

Put up-Roe Resolution, Abortion Tablet Suppliers Work to Broaden Entry

This company and others who are caring for patients who are 11 or 12 weeks pregnant can legally do so at their doctor’s discretion, as studies suggest that abortion pills are safe and effective at this stage. The World Health Organization supports medical terminations of pregnancy up to the 12th week of pregnancy.

dr Daniel Grossman, professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive sciences at the University of California, San Francisco, said medical abortion is safe and effective late in the first trimester, but “there is a slightly higher risk of some complications, including heavy bleeding.” , and an additional dose of misoprostol is often required to fully expel the tissue.

Some services, including abortion telemedicine, automatically send a second round of the four misoprostol tablets to patients undergoing a late first trimester abortion.

Reproductive health experts said patients should be cautioned that expelled tissue earlier in pregnancy resembles a heavy period, but may appear more like a fetus at 10 weeks. dr Abigail RA Aiken, an associate professor at the University of Texas, Austin who leads a medical abortion research group, said preparing patients for what the tissue might look like could also help them protect themselves from legal risks in states that allow abortions forbid – for example , in a situation where a patient is surprised by what he sees and “then you expose that to someone who’s like, ‘Well, I’ll report you.'”

Joann, 23, a single mom, was 10 weeks pregnant when she decided to have an abortion, so she contacted Abortion Telemedicine. She said she initially intended to carry her pregnancy to term, but then her 3-year-old son was diagnosed with autism and her employer, the US military, decided to transfer her to another state. Joann, who asked to be identified by her first name only to protect her privacy, was in Colorado at the time, where abortion is legal but her community was conservative.

The service nurse told her that since she would be taking the pills after the 10th week of pregnancy, she would have to expect more pain and bleeding, advising that the tissue that was expelled might resemble a fetus “so I would be prepared.” . said John.

Categories
Politics

A Tablet to Deal with Covid-19? The U.S. Is Betting on It.

The U.S. government spent more than $ 18 billion last year funding drug manufacturers to produce a Covid vaccine, an effort that resulted in at least five highly effective vaccinations in record time. Now, more than $ 3 billion is pouring into a neglected area of ​​research: developing pills to fight the virus at an early stage of infection that may save many lives in the years to come.

The new program, announced by the Ministry of Health on Thursday, will accelerate clinical trials of some promising drug candidates. If all goes well, some of those first pills could be ready by the end of the year. The Pandemic Antiviral Program will also support research into entirely new drugs – not just for the coronavirus, but for viruses that could cause future pandemics.

A number of other viruses, including influenza, HIV, and hepatitis C, can be treated with a simple pill. But despite more than a year of research, there isn’t a pill like this to treat someone with coronavirus infection before it wreaks havoc. Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration’s program to accelerate Covid-19 research, has invested far more money in vaccine development than in treatments, a void the new program will seek to fill.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and a key supporter of the program, said he was looking forward to a time when Covid-19 patients could pick up antiviral pills from a pharmacy once they test positive for that Coronavirus or develop Covid-19 symptoms.

“I wake up in the morning, I don’t feel very well, my sense of smell and taste goes away, I get a sore throat,” said Dr. Fauci in an interview. “I call my doctor and say, ‘I have Covid and I need a prescription.'”

Dr. Fauci’s support for antiviral pill research stems from his own experience fighting AIDS three decades ago. In the 1990s, his institute conducted research that led to some of the first antiviral pills for HIV, “protease inhibitors,” which can block an essential viral protein and keep the virus in check for life.

In the early 2000s, researchers found that an antiviral agent called sofosbuvir could cure hepatitis C nearly 100 percent of the time. Tamiflu, an over-the-counter influenza pill, can reduce recovery time from infection and reduce the chance that a flu attack will bring someone to the hospital.

At the beginning of the pandemic, researchers began testing existing antivirals in people hospitalized with severe Covid-19. But many of these studies showed no benefit from the antiviral drugs. In hindsight, the decision to work in hospitals was a mistake. Scientists now know that the best time to try to block the coronavirus is in the early days of the illness, when the virus is multiplying rapidly and the immune system has not yet built a defense.

Many people fight their infection and recover, but others have immune systems failing and starting to damage tissues instead of viruses. It is this self-inflicted damage that sends many people with Covid-19 to the hospital as the replication of the coronavirus wears off. So a drug that blocks replication early in an infection could very well fail in a study in patients who have advanced into later stages of the disease.

So far, only one antiviral has shown clear benefit for people in hospitals: remdesivir. Originally studied as a potential cure for Ebola, the drug appears to shorten the course of Covid-19 when given intravenously to patients. In October, it became the first – and so far only – antiviral drug to receive full FDA approval for the treatment of the disease.

However, remdesivir’s performance has overwhelmed many researchers. In November, the World Health Organization recommended not using the drug.

Remdesivir could work more effectively if people could take it earlier as a pill in the course of Covid-19. But in its approved formulation, the compound does not act orally. It cannot survive the passage from the mouth via the stomach to the circulatory system.

Researchers around the world are testing other antivirals that are already known to work in tablet form. One such compound called molnupiravir was developed by researchers at Emory University in 2019 and tested against viruses such as influenza and the Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus.

Working with Miami-based Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, the Emory team conducted experiments on mice that were so impressive that Merck turned to them to help bring the drug into human clinical trials for Covid-19.

“We found this molecule really amazing,” said Daria Hazuda, vice president of infectious diseases and vaccine research at Merck.

However, in a study of hospitalized patients, molnupiravir did not appear to have any effect on the disease. In April, the companies announced that they would end the process.

“I see that and I say, ‘Yes, no,'” said Dr. Tim Sheahan, a virologist at the University of North Carolina. “I’m not surprised that these types of drugs would not dramatically improve the outcome of a person who has been sick for several days.”

The companies started a second study last fall, this time testing the drug on people recently diagnosed with Covid-19. This study is ongoing and Merck is recruiting volunteers at higher risk of infection, such as the elderly with obesity and diabetes. Dr. Hazuda said the study should produce clear results by October.

Last year, government funding for Covid-19 treatments focused on a handful of candidates such as monoclonal antibodies and remdesivir. Many other antiviral drug studies have been small and underfunded. In January, the new government of Biden began developing a new program of antiviral pills.

The first results of this planning could be seen last week. The Department of Health and Human Services announced that it will purchase 1.7 million doses of molnupiravir from Merck for $ 1.2 billion, provided the current study leads to Food and Drug Administration approval. According to Dr. David Kessler, the chief science officer of the Biden government’s Covid-19 response team, the government could seek similar deals for two other antivirals in clinical trials.

The hope “is that by the end of the fall we will have an antiviral that can help us close this chapter of the epidemic,” said Dr. Kessler in an interview.

One of the drugs the government is considering is AT-527, which was developed by Atea Pharmaceuticals. The compound has already been shown to be safe and effective for treating hepatitis C, and early studies suggested it could work against Covid-19 as well. Roche has partnered with Atea to test it in humans, and the companies are currently conducting a late-stage clinical trial.

The other drug on government radar was developed by scientists at Pfizer, adapted from a molecule originally developed as a potential drug for SARS in the early 2000s. This drug was on the shelf for years, but last spring scientists decided to change its structure so that it works against the protease of the new coronavirus. More than 200 Pfizer researchers have teamed up to develop the molecule, initially known as PF-07321332.

The drug was intended for intravenous use, but Pfizer researchers managed to modify its structure so that it works as a pill. When the drug was given orally to mice, it reached a concentration high enough in the body to block the coronavirus. Pfizer started a clinical trial in March to evaluate its safety in humans and expects to move to a later stage of testing next month.

Dr. Kessler acknowledged that there will be challenges in using such pills to reduce hospital stays and deaths from Covid-19. People need access to the drugs once they test positive. “Your testing programs need to be linked to your treatment,” he said.

And if the history of antiviral research is any clue, the first drugs for Covid-19 will likely offer only modest benefits against the disease, said Dr. Fauci. But that would be a good start.

“With all of these drugs we’ve looked at over the years, we’ve never landed a home run the first time,” said Dr. Fauci. “A line drive from the left field wall to the start would be really good.”

The government will also spend up to $ 1.2 billion on research centers where scientists will conduct early-stage studies on drugs that block the coronavirus in other ways. Some drugs can interfere with other essential virus proteins, while others make it impossible to copy the virus’ genes.

Even if the next generation of pills won’t hit the market for a few years, many scientists say research will be a good investment. “It could help with this pandemic and potentially be a first line of defense for the next,” said Mark Namchuk, director of therapeutic translation at Harvard Medical School.

The program will not only support research into pills that work against coronaviruses, but also against other high-risk pathogens like flaviviruses, which cause diseases like dengue and West Nile fever, and togaviruses, the mosquito-borne diseases like chikungunya cause and Eastern equine encephalitis.

“There will always be a threat,” said Dr. Fauci. “I think there will be a long-term need for drugs.”

Categories
Health

A Vaccine Aspect Impact Leaves Ladies Questioning: Why Isn’t the Capsule Safer?

Last month, as the Food and Drug Administration paused use of Johnson & Johnson’s Covid-19 vaccine to evaluate the risk of blood clots in women under 50, many scientists noted that clots associated with birth control pills were much more common.

The comparison was intended to reassure women of the vaccine’s safety. Instead, it has stoked anger in some quarters — not about the pause, but about the fact that most contraceptives available to women are hundreds of times riskier, and yet safer alternatives are not in sight.

The clots linked to the vaccine were a dangerous type in the brain, while birth control pills increase the chances of a blood clot in the leg or lung — a point quickly noted by many experts. But the distinction made little difference to some women.

“Where was everyone’s concern for blood clots when we started putting 14-year-old girls on the pill,” one woman wrote on Twitter.

Another said, “If birth control was made for men it’d taste like bacon and be free.”

Some women heard, on social media and elsewhere, that they should not complain because they had chosen to take birth control knowing the risks involved. “That just made me double down,” said Mia Brett, an expert in legal history focused on race and sexuality. “This is such a common response to women’s health care — that we point out something and it’s dismissed.”

The torrent of fury online was familiar to experts in women’s health. “They should be angry — women’s health just does not get equal attention,” said Dr. Eve Feinberg, a reproductive endocrinologist and infertility specialist at Northwestern University. “There’s a huge sex bias in all of medicine.”

Dr. Feinberg and many of the women online acknowledge that contraceptives have given women control over their fertility, and the benefits far exceed the harms. Rebecca Fishbein, a 31-year-old culture writer, started tweeting about the inadequacy of birth control pills almost immediately after the announcement of the pause.

Still, “birth control is an incredible invention, thank God we have it,” she said last month in an interview. “I’ll fight anyone who tried to take it away.”

Contraceptives have also improved over the years, with intrauterine devices and oral options that offer an ultralow dose of estrogen. “Over all, it’s incredibly safe,” Dr. Feinberg said. “Everything that we do has risks.”

But Dr. Feinberg said it was crucial for health care providers to discuss the risks with their patients and coach them on worrisome symptoms — a conversation many women said they had never had.

Kelly Tyrrell, a communications professional in Madison, Wis., was 37 when doctors discovered potentially fatal blood clots in her lungs.

Ms. Tyrrell is an endurance athlete — wiry, strong and not prone to anxiety. In early 2019, she began waking up with a pain in her left calf. After one particularly bad morning, an urgent care visit revealed that she had high blood levels of “D dimer,” a protein fragment that indicates the presence of clots.

She had been taking birth control pills for 25 years, but none of the doctors made a connection. Instead, they said that given her age, fitness and the lack of other risk factors, her symptoms were unlikely to be from a blood clot. They sent her home with instructions to do stretches for her calf muscle.

When she felt a tightness in her chest while running in Hawaii after her grandmother’s funeral, doctors said the cause was probably stress and anxiety. In July 2019, she finished a 100K race in Colorado and assumed her aching lungs and purple lips were the result of running for 19 hours at a high altitude.

But she knew something was seriously wrong on the morning of Oct. 24, 2019, when she became short of breath after walking up a short flight of stairs.

This time, after ruling out heart problems, doctors scanned her lungs and discovered multiple clots. One had cut off blood flow to a portion of her right lung.

“I instantly burst into tears,” Ms. Tyrrell recalled. The doctors put her on a course of blood thinners — and told her never to touch estrogen again. Ms. Tyrrell switched to a copper IUD. Over time, she added, the incident had escalated into a sharp rage that was renewed by the Johnson & Johnson news.

“Part of my anger was that a medication that I took to control my fertility ended up threatening my mortality,” she said. “I’m angry that I hadn’t been counseled better about that risk, or even what to look for.”

Emily Farris, 36, was prescribed oral contraceptives at age 18 to help with migraines. In all of the conversations she has had with her many doctors over the years, “never once was blood clots brought up,” she said in an interview.

On Twitter, some critics pointed out that the inserts with birth control packs clearly describe the blood clot risk. “My response is a bit incredulous to that,” said Dr. Farris, a political scientist at Texas Christian University in Fort Worth.

The inserts for most medications have a long list of possible side effects, placing “a high burden for folks to try to sort through medical research, to sort through what probability and statistics mean,” she said.

Even with a Ph.D.-level education, “I can’t assess those risks,” Dr. Farris added. “I think most Americans need someone to translate what the legalese kind of pamphlet is into real terms.”

For Ms. Tyrrell, that elucidation came much too late. Her lungs have not felt the same since her diagnosis, but she is not sure whether that is because of lingering damage from a previous blood clot, new clots that she should be worried about or simply her age, she said, adding, “It’s never not on my mind anymore.”

Categories
Health

Pfizer at-home Covid capsule could possibly be out there by year-end, CEO Albert Bourla says

Pfizer’s experimental oral drug to treat Covid-19 at the first sign of illness could be available by the end of the year, CEO Albert Bourla told CNBC on Tuesday.

The company, which developed the first approved Covid-19 vaccine in the US with the German drug manufacturer BioNTech, started an early clinical study in March testing a new antiviral therapy for Covid. The drug belongs to a class of drugs called protease inhibitors, and it works by blocking an enzyme that the virus needs to replicate in human cells.

Protease inhibitors are used to treat other viral pathogens such as HIV and hepatitis C.

If the clinical trials go well and the Food and Drug Administration approves it, the drug could be distributed in the US by the end of the year, Bourla told CNBC’s Squawk Box.

Health experts say the orally taken drug could be a game changer as people newly infected with the virus could use it outside of hospitals. The researchers hope the drugs will prevent the disease from getting worse and prevent hospital stays.

In addition to the drug, Pfizer is also testing its vaccine in 6-month-old to 11-year-old children. Vaccinating children is critical to ending the pandemic, say public health officials and infectious disease experts.

Earlier this month, the company asked the FDA to extend their vaccine approval to teenagers ages 12-15 after a study found the shot was 100% effective.

Bourla told CNBC on Tuesday that he was “very optimistic” that the FDA would approve the use of the shot in teenagers.