Tag: Pentagon

Categories
Politics

In Reversal, Pentagon Publicizes Plane Service Nimitz Will Stay in Center East

In Reversal, Pentagon Announces Aircraft Carrier Nimitz Will Remain in Middle East

WASHINGTON – The Pentagon said Sunday it had ordered the aircraft carrier Nimitz to remain in the Middle East over Iranian threats against President Trump and other American officials, just three days after the warship was sent home to ease mounting tensions Tehran.

Acting Secretary of Defense, Christopher C. Miller, abruptly overturned his previous order to reinstate the Nimitz, which he had done against the objections of his top military advisers. The military had been preoccupied with a muscle-building strategy for weeks to prevent Iran from attacking American personnel in the Persian Gulf.

“Due to the recent threats by Iranian leaders against President Trump and other US government officials, I have ordered the USS Nimitz to cease its routine redeployment,” Miller said in a statement on Sunday evening.

United States intelligence agencies have noted for months that Iran is attempting to target senior American military officers and civilian leaders in order to assassinate the death in an American of Maj. Gen. Qassim Suleimani, commander of Iran’s elite quds force in the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps avenge drone attack a year ago.

However, it was unclear what the new urgency of these threats led Mr. Miller to cancel his previous order to send the Nimitz home. In the past few days, Iranian officials have been stepping up their fiery news against the United States. The head of Iran’s judiciary, Ebrahim Raisi, said that anyone involved in the assassination of General Suleimani would not be able to “escape from law and justice” even if they were an American president.

It was unclear last week whether Mr. Trump was aware of Mr. Miller’s order to send the Nimitz to its homeport in Bremerton, Washington, after a longer than usual 10 month deployment.

Some Trump administration officials suggested on Sunday that with a controversial political week – the Georgia Senate runoff on Tuesday and the House and Senate meeting on Wednesday to win President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. confirm – the look of the aircraft carriers steaming from the Middle East did not match the White House.

Whatever the reason, the mixed news surrounding the aviation company’s movements is raising new questions about coordination and communication between an inexperienced Pentagon leadership and the White House in the dwindling days of the Trump administration.

Some current and former Pentagon officials have criticized the decision-making process at the Pentagon since Mr. Trump sacked Secretary of Defense Mark T. Esper and several of his top advisors in November and replaced them with Mr. Miller, a former counter-terrorism adviser to the White House. and several Trump loyalists.

Officials said Friday that Mr Miller ordered the redeployment of the Nimitz in part as a “de-escalation” signal to Tehran to avoid falling into a crisis at the end of Mr Trump’s administration that would land in Mr Biden’s lap in office.

In the past few weeks, Mr Trump has repeatedly threatened Iran on Twitter, and in November senior national security aides advised the president against launching a pre-emptive strike against an Iranian nuclear facility.

The Central Command of the Pentagon had published several violent demonstrations for weeks to warn Tehran of the consequences of an attack on American troops or diplomats.

The Nimitz and other warships arrived to protect American forces withdrawing from Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia. The Air Force dispatched B-52 bombers three times to fly within 60 miles of the Iranian coast. And the Navy announced for the first time in nearly a decade that it had commanded a cruise missile submarine into the Persian Gulf.

American intelligence reports indicated that Iran and its deputies may have been preparing a strike last weekend to avenge the deaths of General Suleimani and Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, head of the Iran-backed militia Kataib Hezbollah, who was last seen Killed in the same United States drone strike in Baghdad on January 1st.

American intelligence analysts have discovered Iranian air defenses, naval forces and other security units on high alert in the past few days. They also noted that Iran brought more short-range missiles and drones into Iraq.

But senior Defense Department officials admit they cannot say whether Iran or its Shiite proxies in Iraq are ready to beat American troops or prepare defensive measures if Mr Trump orders a pre-emptive attack against them.

Categories
World News

In Abrupt Reversal of Iran Technique, Pentagon Orders Plane Provider Residence

In Abrupt Reversal of Iran Strategy, Pentagon Orders Aircraft Carrier Home

WASHINGTON – The Pentagon abruptly sent the aircraft carrier Nimitz home from the Middle East and Africa to raise objections to senior military advisers. This marks the reversal of a week-long muscle building strategy designed to deter Iran from attacking American troops and diplomats in the Persian Gulf.

Officials said on Friday that incumbent Defense Secretary Christopher C. Miller had ordered the ship to be redeployed in part as a “de-escalation” signal to Tehran to avoid President Trump falling into crisis in the dwindling days of his term in office. American intelligence reports suggest that Iran and its deputies may be preparing a strike this weekend to avenge the death of Major General Qassim Suleimani, the commander of Iran’s elite Quds force in the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

Pentagon senior officials said Mr Miller believed that dispatching the Nimitz before the first anniversary of General Suleimani’s death in an American drone strike in Iraq would eliminate what Iranian hardliners see as the provocation justifying their threats against Americans could be military targets. Some analysts said the Nimitz’s return to her home port of Bremerton, Washington, would be a welcome relief in tension between the two countries.

“If the Nimitz leaves, it could be because the Pentagon believes the threat may lessen somewhat,” said Michael P. Mulroy, the Pentagon’s former chief politician in the Middle East.

However, critics said the mixed news was another example of the inexperience and confusing decision-making at the Pentagon since Trump fired Secretary of Defense Mark T. Esper and several of his top aides in November and replaced them with Mr. Miller, a former counter-terrorism adviser at the White House and several Trump loyalists.

“This decision sends a mixed signal to Iran at best and reduces our choices at just the wrong time,” said Matthew Spence, a former senior Pentagon leader in the Middle East. “It seriously questions what strategy the administration is pursuing here.”

Mr. Miller’s order canceled a request from General Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., commander of the American Forces in the Middle East, to extend the Nimitz’s service and keep her formidable wing of attack aircraft ready.

In the past few weeks, Mr Trump has repeatedly threatened Iran on Twitter, and in November senior national security aides advised the president against launching a pre-emptive strike against an Iranian nuclear facility. It is unclear whether Mr Trump was aware of Mr Miller’s order to send the Nimitz home.

The Pentagon and General McKenzie’s Central Command had published several violent demonstrations over weeks to warn Tehran of the consequences of an attack. The Nimitz and other warships arrived to protect American forces withdrawing from Iraq, Afghanistan and Somalia. The Air Force dispatched B-52 bombers three times to fly within 60 miles of the Iranian coast. And the Navy announced for the first time in nearly a decade that it had ordered a Tomahawk missile submarine into the Persian Gulf.

On Wednesday, General McKenzie warned the Iranians and their Shiite militia representatives in Iraq against attacks around the anniversary of General Suleimani’s death on January 3.

On Thursday, senior military advisers including General McKenzie and General Mark A. Milley, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, were surprised by Mr Miller’s decision on the Nimitz.

The Navy had attempted to expand the aircraft carrier’s already protracted use, but commanders believed the warship would remain for a few more days to counter what military intelligence analysts saw as a growing and imminent threat.

American intelligence analysts have discovered Iranian air defenses, naval forces and other security forces on greater alert in the past few days. They also noted that Iran brought more short-range missiles and drones into Iraq. But senior Defense Department officials admit they cannot say whether Iran or its Shiite proxies in Iraq are ready to beat American troops or prepare defensive measures if Mr Trump orders a pre-emptive attack against them.

“What you have here is a classic security dilemma where maneuvers on either side can be misunderstood and increase the risk of miscalculation,” said Brett H. McGurk, Trump’s former special envoy for the coalition on the defeat of Islamic State.

Some of Mr. Miller’s top advisors, including Ezra Cohen-Watnick, one of the White House loyalists newly appointed as Pentagon’s chief intelligence officer, have expressed doubts about the Nimitz’s deterrent value, especially when weighed against the moral cost of their expanding tour . Some aides also questioned the impending attack by Iran or its proxies, an assessment CNN had previously reported.

Pentagon officials said they had sent additional land-based warplanes and attack jets, as well as refueling planes, to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states to compensate for the Nimitz’s loss of firepower.

On Friday, the commander in chief of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Paramilitary Corps said his country was fully prepared to respond to US military pressure amid mounting tensions between Tehran and Washington in the waning days of Trump’s presidency.

“Today we have no problem, worry or concern about meeting any powers,” Major General Hossein Salami said at a ceremony at Tehran University to commemorate the anniversary of General Suleimani’s death.

“We will give our last words to our enemies on the battlefield,” said General Salami, without directly mentioning the United States.

Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif said Thursday that the Trump administration was creating an excuse for war.

“Instead of fighting Covid in the US, @realDonaldTrump & Cohorts are wasting billions flying B52 and sending Armadas to our region,” Zarif said in a tweet. “Iraqi intelligence agencies suggest a conspiracy to create the pretext for war. Iran does not seek war, but will openly and directly defend its people, security and vital interests. “

In a further provocation from Iran on Friday, Tehran informed international inspectors that the production of uranium with a significantly higher enrichment was to begin in Fordow, a plant that lies deep under a mountain and is therefore more difficult to attack. The move appeared primarily to be aimed at putting pressure on President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. to re-join the nuclear deal with Iran. Little activity was allowed at the Fordow plant under the 2015 contract.

The message to the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, the United Nations group that oversees the production of nuclear material, said Iran will resume production of uranium enriched with 20 percent purity. This is the highest level it produced before the nuclear deal, which the country justified at the time as necessary for the production of medical isotopes for its Tehran research reactor.

Fuel enriched to this level is not enough to make a bomb, but it is close. It requires relatively little further enrichment to reach the 90 percent purity traditionally used for bomb fuel.

The move wasn’t unexpected. The Iranian parliament recently passed a law requiring the government to increase both the amount of fuel it produces and the level of enrichment. But the decision to carry out this production in Fordow, the newest plant, was significant. The facility is located deep under a mountain in a well-protected base of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards. A successful attack would require repeated attacks using the largest bunker bomb in the American arsenal.

It would be months for Iran to produce a significant amount of 20 percent enrichment fuel, but the mere announcement could be another red flag for Mr Trump to rekindle the bombing options.

David E. Sanger contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Biden accuses Trump’s Pentagon and OMB of obstruction, calls for cooperation

Biden accuses Trump's Pentagon and OMB of obstruction, demands cooperation

President-elect Joe Biden said Monday his transition team had encountered “roadblocks” and “obstacles” among the heads of the Trump administration at key agencies, hampering the new administration’s efforts to prepare for the presidency.

But one of those agency chiefs, incumbent Defense Secretary Christopher Miller, pushed back Biden’s criticism and highlighted the recent dispute between President Donald Trump’s Pentagon and the President-elect.

“The truth is that many of the agencies vital to our security have suffered tremendous damage,” Biden said during a speech in Delaware after briefing from his national security and foreign policy agency review teams.

“Many of them have been undermined in terms of human resources, capacity and morale. Political processes have stunted or stopped,” he said.

Biden, who will take office in less than a month, highlighted the Department of Defense and the Office of Administration and Budget in his speech.

“Our team has received exemplary cooperation from some agencies,” said Biden. “We have encountered obstacles from the political leadership of that ministry from others, particularly the Ministry of Defense.”

He later added, “We have encountered obstacles from the political leadership in the Department of Defense and the Bureau of Administration and Budget. At the moment we are simply not getting all of the information we need from the outgoing administration for key national security areas.”

“In my opinion it’s nothing less than irresponsibility,” said Biden.

In a statement later Monday, incumbent defense chief Miller defended his agency’s coordination with Biden’s team.

“The Department of Defense conducted 164 interviews with over 400 officials and provided over 5,000 pages of documents – far more than originally requested by Biden’s transition team,” Miller’s statement said.

Included in this statement is a bulleted list of “transition facts” which indicates that all interviews with the transition team are being conducted for the first time in practical light of the coronavirus pandemic.

The agency’s efforts “are already outperforming the youngest administrations in more than three weeks,” said Miller, “and we continue to plan additional meetings for the remainder of the transition and respond to any information requests in our area of ​​responsibility.”

Department of Defense officials, the statement added, “have worked with the utmost professionalism to support transition activities on a compressed schedule and they will continue to do so in a transparent and collegial manner that upholds the best traditions of the department. The American people expect nothing less and that’s what I’m still committed to. “

The Bureau of Administration and Housekeeping did not immediately respond to CNBC’s requests for comment.

Biden applauded his agency review teams for doing “an excellent job” despite the pandemic and delays in receiving federal funding through Trump’s General Services Administration. These obstacles emerged when the president refused to allow Biden and his electoral team and others continued their efforts to overturn the elections.

According to Biden, it is an urgent concern “to ensure that nothing is lost during the handover between the administrations”.

“We need a comprehensive look at the current budget planning of the Department of Defense and other agencies to avoid the confusion and catch-up that our opponents may be trying to exploit.”

While the president-elect’s remarks were among his most critical of the Trump administration from the Wilmington lectern, they were not the first instance of Biden’s struggles with Trump’s Department of Defense.

Tensions between the Pentagon and Biden’s team became public earlier this month over Miller’s decision to cancel meetings with the Transition team for the rest of the year.

Miller said in a statement that there was a “mutually agreed vacation break” but a Biden spokesman replied that no such agreement had been made.

“Let me be clear: there was no mutually agreed vacation break,” transition spokesman Yohannes Abraham told reporters.

It was weeks after the election when defense officials confirmed that the transition process within the Pentagon had begun.

“The first meeting today was via videoconference. It was a good, productive meeting and we set some ground rules,” said Tom Muir, director of Washington Headquarters Services, during a Pentagon briefing on November 24th.

“They look forward to participating in discussions here at the Pentagon,” added Muir, who will facilitate the transition process.

Muir said at the time that the Biden team will have dedicated office space in the Pentagon and reasonable access to information.

Categories
Politics

Biden transition, prime Pentagon officers at odds over canceled briefings

Biden transition, top Pentagon officials at odds over canceled briefings

U.S. President-elect Joe Biden looks at his watch as he arrives to meet former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg as his candidate for Secretary of Transportation during a press conference on December 16, 2020 at Biden’s Interim Headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware , USA.

Kevin Lemarque | Reuters

WASHINGTON – Tension erupted on Friday between President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team and Pentagon officials as incumbent Defense Secretary Christopher Miller abruptly decided on Thursday to cancel the transition team’s meetings with Pentagon officials for the remainder of the year.

In a statement Friday, Miller claimed that the Biden transition and the Department of Defense would be taking a “mutually agreed vacation break” and resuming meetings and briefings in the new year.

However, a spokesman for the Biden transition team said there never was such a mutual agreement.

“Let me be clear: there was no consensual vacation break,” said transition spokesman Yohannes Abraham on Friday afternoon to reporters. “In fact, we think it is important that briefings and other engagements continue during this time, as there is no more time.”

The abrupt interruption of the meetings took Defense Department officials by surprise, according to Axios, who first reported the news of Miller’s decision.

A Department of Defense spokesman did not respond to a request for comment from CNBC on the conflicting reports by Miller and Biden interim officials.

But Abraham left little doubt as to how frustrated the Biden team is with senior Pentagon officials who they believe have so far refused to cooperate fully with the transition. “There have been many agencies and departments that have facilitated sharing information and meetings over the past few weeks,” said Abraham. “But there have been pockets of discontent, and DoD is one of them.”

However, Miller insisted that at no point had the Pentagon “canceled or declined” an interview with Biden interim officials. He said the department would “continue to support the agency’s necessary review team to ensure the safety of our nation and its citizens.”

The Biden team hoped the Department of Defense would reverse their decision. “Regarding when to resume meetings, meetings and requests for information, which are essentially interchangeable, it is our hope and expectation that it will happen immediately,” said Abraham.

Miller was due to meet with President Donald Trump on Friday afternoon, the only publicly announced event on Trump’s daily schedule.

Miller was named acting Secretary of Defense on November 9 after Trump abruptly dismissed Secretary of Defense Mark Esper.

Categories
Politics

Pentagon Weighs Sharp Disadvantage in Assist for C.I.A.

Pentagon Weighs Sharp Drawback in Support for C.I.A.

WASHINGTON – The Trump administration is considering withdrawing military support to the CIA, including the potential withdrawal of much of the CIA-operated drone fleet, according to current and former officials. The postponement could severely limit the agency’s counter-terrorism efforts, which expanded significantly after the September 11, 2001 attacks.

The government is considering several options that could go into effect as early as January 5th. One would reduce the number of Pentagon personnel posted to the agency – many of them special forces forces who work in the CIA’s paramilitary division. However, other changes that are being considered would be far broader and more consistent, making it difficult for the agency to operate from military bases, use the Department of Defense’s medical evacuation capabilities, or conduct covert drone strikes against terrorists at hot spots around the world.

Former officials warned President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. can reverse changes immediately as soon as he takes office next month. However, depending on how quickly the Pentagon makes such decisions, it might be more difficult for the new administration to reverse them quickly.

It wasn’t clear why the Trump administration was pushing its review as Mr Biden could easily turn it back. Some former agency officials viewed the move as a final attempt by President Trump, who has long berated intelligence services for their assessment that Russia intervened to support its 2016 presidential campaign and downsize the CIA

The Pentagon is currently reviewing a 15-year-old memorandum of understanding with the CIA to move some staff from supporting the agency to other posts, a senior administration official said. Some in the Pentagon believe the CIA has received too many military assets, and the Department of Defense wants a greater say in their allocation.

Ezra Cohen-Watnick, who was appointed assistant secretary of defense for intelligence last month and seen among some career officials as a highly ideological Trump loyalist, pushed the effort forward, current and former officials said. Christopher C. Miller, the acting Secretary of Defense and longtime Army Green Beret, supports it as long overdue and part of the business as usual for the Pentagon, which, according to a senior American official, has to constantly review how it is using its assets.

“The Pentagon has tried to better use its resources to focus more on the so-called great power competition with China,” Air Force Lt. Col. Uriah L. Orland replied to a request for comment when asked for comment.

“Much has changed in the first two decades of this century, and DOD is only working with the CIA to ensure that both DOD and CIA are able to work together to address United States national security challenges,” he said.

While the CIA refused to discuss the deliberations, Nicole de Haay, a spokeswoman for the agency, said she was confident that close cooperation with the Department of Defense would continue “for years to come.”

“There is no stronger relationship and no better partnership,” she said. “This partnership has resulted in achievements that have greatly improved US national security.”

The review includes the assignment of counter-terrorism military experts, which the Pentagon referred to the CIA, but the changes could be more extensive, according to those briefed on the effort.

One version of the plan could reduce the number of military bases the Pentagon makes available to the CIA and even reduce the number of places in the world where the Department of Defense provides medical evacuation and treatment to officials and contractors.

“That would be a setback for US national security,” said Michael P. Mulroy, former Pentagon chief Middle East policy officer and former CIA paramilitary officer, in an email about the proposed changes. “As a team, this relationship resulted in some of the greatest successes in Afghanistan, Iraq and the global war on terrorism.”

Defense One covered the Pentagon Review earlier.

Since the 9/11 attacks, the CIA has replenished its small number of unmanned armed drones with assets and pilots on loan from the Pentagon. According to former officials, around two-thirds to three-quarters of the CIA’s drone fleet is now owned and loaned to the agency by the Air Force.

The CIA’s strikes are undercover and are not recognized by the agency. During the Bush and Obama administrations, the CIA used military drones to carry out increasingly deadly air strikes in Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia and elsewhere. The CIA, not the military, has carried out some of the government’s airstrikes in recent decades because some host countries prevented the American military from operating on their territory. The CIA can also act faster, argued former officials.

“The CIA’s process of authorizing lethal strikes against individuals is faster than the military’s more bureaucratic procedures,” said Kevin Carroll, a former CIA officer. “In this way, decaying, time-critical counter-terrorism goals could be missed.”

CIA drone strikes have decreased in recent years, and the agency has pulled back from strikes in some countries, such as Pakistan, that were once the focus of its operations, according to former officials.

Last year, the Trump administration began curtailing the nation’s counter-terrorism efforts to shift the focus of intelligence agencies to China. That year, Richard Grenell, then acting director of the National Intelligence Service, ordered a review of the National Counter-Terrorism Center, which resulted in its size being reduced.

Human rights groups are likely to welcome a further reduction in CIA air strikes. You have long spoken out against the targeted murder of terrorist suspects by the government, but you were particularly frustrated with the secret nature of the CIA program.

“The CIA shouldn’t be responsible for targeted murders because it can’t naturally meet international transparency standards,” said Andrea J. Prasow, Washington deputy director at Human Rights Watch.

The Pentagon has told Biden interim officials that it is reviewing its agreement to assist the CIA in the effort to shift resources from the counter-terrorism mission to the Chinese threat.

Most administrations withhold important decisions in the final days of a president’s term with profound consequences. Former officials say the revision of the operating agreement between the CIA and the Pentagon is exactly that kind of change with global implications that should be left to the Biden administration.

However, the deal could make it difficult for the CIA to conduct some of its operations in Afghanistan next month as the Pentagon tries to reduce the number of soldiers there. However, people who have been briefed on the matter say the military continues to support the CIA despite the drawdown orders.

The close ties between the CIA and special military operations personnel were underscored last month when a CIA paramilitary officer was killed in Somalia. General Mark A Milley, chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, publicly announced the official’s death in a comment last week to a think tank. General Milley noted that the officer had previously served in the military as a member of the Navy SEALs.

The Pentagon announced last week that virtually all of Somalia’s 700 or so troops – most of the special forces that have conducted training and counter-terrorism missions – will leave by January 15, five days before Mr Biden’s inauguration.

Military officials said the Pentagon will continue to conduct counter-terrorism operations from neighboring Djibouti and Kenya, but the withdrawal of American forces is likely to complicate the role of CIA paramilitary officers remaining in Somalia.

Over the past two decades, the military-CIA partnership has halted “numerous terrorist attacks,” said Marc Polymeropoulos, a former CIA officer who has spent much of his career fighting terrorism.

“The fight against terrorism is not over yet, even if we turn to competition from China and Russia,” he said. “This reported move also puts CIA staff at considerable risk. At a time when a CIA officer was recently killed in Somalia, it is hard to imagine why the Department of Defense would pull the necessary Medevac platforms for our officers at the tip of the spear. “

Categories
Politics

Biden’s Alternative for Pentagon Faces Questions on Ties to Contractors

Biden’s Choice for Pentagon Faces Questions on Ties to Contractors

WASHINGTON – Three weeks ago a naval ship launched a military contractor’s experimental missile off Hawaii to intercept and destroy a decoy pretending to be an incoming nuclear weapon for the first time in space.

The same company, Raytheon Technologies, that accomplished the feat was selected for another contract this year in a program that could cost up to $ 20 billion to build a new generation of nuclear-armed cruise missiles for the United States .

And Raytheon, whose 195,000 employees make warplanes, weapons, high-tech sensors, and dozens of other military products, has sold billions of dollars in weapons and radar systems to allies in the Middle East in recent years, some of which have been used to help To wage war in Yemen.

Now, Raytheon could soon have another differentiator: one board member, retired Army General Lloyd J. Austin III, has been named the next Secretary of Defense by President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Raytheon isn’t General Austin’s only connection with military contractors. He was also a partner in an investment firm that bought small defense firms. And his move from the arms business to a leadership role in the Pentagon continues a pattern that President Trump has begun in recent years.

Mr Trump elected James N. Mattis, also a retired four-star general, who then served on the board of General Dynamics, another major military entrepreneur, as its first secretary of defense. Mark T. Esper, a former Raytheon chief lobbyist, succeeded Mr. Mattis.

This is a departure from the norm. Defense ministers who had served prior to Mr Trump’s tenure – at least three decades until President George Bush’s tenure – did not come directly from boards or executive suites of contractors, although some, like Ashton Carter, President Barack Obama’s last Secretary of Defense, did served as an industry advisor.

Mr. Biden’s decision to appoint General Austin has raised a new wave of questions about the corporate relationships of people Mr. Biden selects to serve in his administration.

These links are especially relevant when it comes to the Pentagon, which spends hundreds of billions of dollars each year on weapons and other supplies. During Mr. Trump’s tenure, the military budget increased by about 15 percent, reaching $ 705 billion in the last fiscal year. This is one of the highest values ​​in constant US dollars since World War II.

“It is important for the defense minister to bring independence of thought into this role, and it is deeply worrying when a candidate comes straight from one of the major military contractors,” said Daryl G. Kimball, the executive director of the arms control association, who pointed out urges reducing nuclear weapons and military spending.

He added, “I would note that Raytheon has a tremendous financial stake in upcoming decisions by the Biden administration, Congress and the Secretary of Defense.”

At Raytheon, officials are said to be excited about the prospect of a board member becoming secretary of defense, according to a person who works with the company. However, that person and another person working with Raytheon warned that the appointment could result in an undesirable audit of the company.

Even members of Mr. Biden’s own party had urged Mr. Biden to refrain from nominating anyone for the job of Secretary of Defense who came directly from the military business world.

“US national security should not be defined by the bottom line of Boeing, General Dynamics and Raytheon,” Democrat Representative Mark Pocan of Wisconsin said in a statement last month.

As Secretary of Defense, General Austin would have to sell any stock he holds in Raytheon or other defense companies, or companies that do business in the industry, and would most likely be prohibited from directing contract decisions or other “special matter” directly affecting companies with whom he has had financial relationships for the past two years if Mr. Biden follows the ethical guidelines first adopted by Mr. Obama.

General Austin joined Raytheon Technologies in April as part of a merger between Raytheon Company, known as a manufacturer of Patriot and Tomahawk missiles, and United Technologies, a manufacturer of commercial and military jet engines and avionics. General Austin joined the board in June In 2016 after leaving the military.

According to Raytheon records, General Austin owned more than $ 500,000 in Raytheon stock as of October. As a member of the United Technologies board of directors, General Austin received a total of $ 1.4 million in stock and other compensation over a four year period.

Raytheon is now one of the largest military contractors in the world. Raytheon boasts in an earnings report to Wall Street that it has a record federal government order book totaling $ 73 billion.

His aggressive drive over the past five years to sell billions of dollars in precision-guided bombs and bomb parts to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which weaponized civilians in a catastrophic war in Yemen, sparked an outcry from human rights groups and some members of Congress who repeatedly tried to block sales.

But Raytheon, who pays an army of well-connected lobbyists, overcame the opposition and sold the weapons – thanks in part to his close relationship with the Trump administration.

General Austin was also a partner in an investment firm called Pine Island Capital, which he joined on the board of directors in July. The company was recently on a buying spree from small military contractors including Precinmac Precision Machining, which sells specialty parts for missile launch systems and machine guns.

By the time General Austin joined Pine Island, Pine Island said he was “already fully committed, working with us on new investments and bringing his experience and judgment to our portfolio companies,” including InVeris Training Solutions, the virtual gun firing training service offers.

General Austin, Anthony J. Blinken, the election of Mr. Biden as Secretary of State, and Michèle A. Flournoy, who had been Mr. Biden’s other nominee for Secretary of Defense, were made clear because of their connections with the Pine Island team competed in the past few months prior to the sale of $ 218 million worth of stock in preparation for buying other defense industry targets.

Pine Island has a partnership with WestExec Advisors, a consulting firm founded in part by Mr. Blinken and Ms. Flournoy. Another Raytheon board member, former Pentagon official Robert O. Work, was also involved with WestExec and advised Mr Biden’s transition to national security planning.

While WestExec advised at least one defense contractor, a WestExec spokeswoman did not respond to questions about whether Raytheon was a customer, stating that the company has nondisclosure agreements with many customers and “does not comment on potential customers.”

When asked about General Austin’s relationships with defense companies, Andrew Bates, a spokesman for Mr. Biden’s transition, said, “Every cabinet member will comply with all disclosure requirements and strict ethical rules, including withdrawals as appropriate.”

He added that General Austin and Mr. Blinken, if confirmed, would sell all of Pine Island’s shares.

It’s not clear how much equity they have in Pine Island.

Mandy Smithberger, a director of the Project on Government Oversight, which tracks federal contract decisions, said the problem with hiring former industry executives as senior Pentagon officials is broader because they often bring with them an industry-friendly mindset.

As a result, Mr Biden’s administration may find it more difficult to make the tough decisions that will be necessary as the United States faces large budget deficits and growing demands for public health programs to increase to better prepare for the next global world to be pandemic.

“The defense industry is already way too close to the Pentagon, and if the Biden administration is to reform the department the way we know, that must change,” Ms. Smithberger said. “What is in the best interests of our national security may not be the same as what is in the best interests of the defense industry.”