Tag: overturn

Categories
Politics

Trump pushed DOJ to overturn 2020 election outcomes: Home panel

Trump pushed DOJ to overturn 2020 election results: House panel

Then-President Donald Trump put pressure on his new acting attorney general to overturn the 2020 vote, telling him, “Just say the election was corrupt + leave the rest to me and the R. Congressmen,” it says a phone call that was posted on Friday to a House Committee.

Trump also suggested he consider replacing the Justice Department leadership, according to the records of then-Assistant Attorney General Richard Donoghue, who called on Dec. 27.

Donoghue’s report on the call shows that Trump “directly directed our nation’s chief law enforcement agency to take steps to overturn a free and fair election in the final days of his presidency,” said House Oversight and Reform Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney, DN.Y in a press release.

The committee has already started scheduling witness interviews “to investigate the full extent of the former president’s corruption,” Maloney said.

Donoghue’s notes do not specify which Republican lawmaker Trump was referring to to overthrow Joe Biden’s victory. But Trump mentioned GOP representatives Jim Jordan from Ohio, Scott Perry from Pennsylvania, and Senator Ron Johnson from Wisconsin elsewhere on the call.

Jordan spokesman Russell Dye told CNBC in a statement that the congressman “has not pressured anyone in the Justice Department about the 2020 election, has not pressured them,” and that he “continues to agree with President Trump that it is perfectly.” is appropriate to raise concerns about electoral integrity. “

Johnson “had no discussions with President Trump about the DOJ questioning the election results,” said his spokeswoman Alexa Henning.

Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, DN.Y., speaks during a House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing on DC statehood on Tuesday, February 11, 2020.

Caroline Brehman | CQ name call | Getty Images

The notes also show that Rosen and Donoghue are trying to inform Trump that his claims of widespread electoral fraud are not supported by evidence. Just four days before the call, Rosen became Trump’s incumbent AG after the resignation of William Barr.

“Much of the information you are receiving is inaccurate,” the phone notes shared with Trump said.

Later in the conversation, Trump claimed, “These people who say the elections are not corrupt are corrupt,” the notes read.

A Trump spokeswoman did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request to comment on the committee’s release. A Perry spokesman also did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump has never admitted defeat to Biden. After his loss, Trump aggressively spread a wide range of baseless conspiracy theories in support of the false claim that the elections were rigged against him.

His lawyers and allies filed dozens of lawsuits in key states, all aimed at undoing Biden’s victory. No one was able to reverse the votes or change the results of the state elections.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

Donoghue’s notes are just the latest material House investigators have held up as evidence of Trump’s efforts to rely on government institutions to contest his electoral defeat.

Last month, Maloney’s committee dumped more than 200 pages of emails between DOJ officials and White House staff allegedly attempting to ask the Supreme Court to overturn major state election results.

Earlier this week, the DOJ announced former Trump administration officials that they would be able to partner with House and Senate investigations into Trump’s election reversal efforts in the final months of his only term in office.

Maloney’s committee has sent letters to Rosen and Donoghue asking them to appear for transcribed interviews. The panel has also asked former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, former Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Clark, former Assistant Attorney General Patrick Hovakimian, former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia Byung Jin Pak, and former Acting U.S. Attorney General Prosecutor for interviewing District Bobby Christine.

Categories
Politics

Trump Raised $255.four Million in eight Weeks as He Sought to Overturn Election Consequence

Trump Raised $255.4 Million in 8 Weeks as He Sought to Overturn Election Result

President Donald J. Trump and the Republican Party raised $ 255.4 million in the more than eight weeks following the November 3 election, new federal records show, as he attempted to undermine the results on unsubstantiated fraud allegations to reverse.

Mr Trump’s strongest fundraising came immediately after the election, for example after major media organizations announced that Joseph R. Biden Jr. won on November 7th. Yet even when Mr Trump and his legal team lost the case afterwards – in places like the Supreme Court – his donors continued to give repeats. From November 24th through the end of the year, more than two million contributions went to Mr. Trump, the Republican National Committee and their joint accounts.

The donations were posted over the weekend on a Federal Election Commission filing by WinRed, the digital platform that Republicans use to process online donations. Mr. Trump’s campaign committee, joint committees with the RNC, and the new political action committee he formed after the elections, Save America, will be filing additional information on Sunday with more details on spending and fundraising.

Mr Trump had previously announced that he and the RNC raised $ 207.5 million in the first month after the election. The new records show that his fundraising fell sharply in December compared to November, particularly after December 14, the day the electoral college officially cast its ballot to make Mr Biden the 46th president of the nation, and the reality possibly. Some of Mr. Trump’s supporters spoke of the futility of trying to reverse the outcome.

In the two weeks leading up to the electoral college vote, Mr Trump and the RNC had raised an average of $ 2.9 million a day online. In the two weeks that followed, the average was $ 1.2 million.

In fact, Mr Trump and the RNC had raised more than $ 2 million online every day since the election through December 14. For the remainder of the year, through December 31st, when donations are made at the end of the year.

The new numbers capture almost all of Mr. Trump’s online fundraising drives when he stopped raising money on Jan. 6, addressing a crowd of supporters who then stormed the Capitol in a violent uproar and the Mr. Biden was officially ratified by Congress as the next President.

After this uprising, Mr Trump essentially stopped sending donations to his supporters (the RNC took a break of about a week). His last campaign email that day began: “TODAY is going to be a historic day in our nation’s history.”

Even so, Mr Trump left office with the tens of millions of dollars raised for his new Save America PAC, which he can use to fund a post-president political operation, including travel and staff.

But Mr Trump is still facing a surge in legal costs as an impeachment trial in the Senate is set to begin in just over a week. Late on Saturday, Mr Trump abruptly parted ways with senior attorney Butch Bowers to defend his impeachment.

In his first impeachment, the RNC covered some of the legal costs for Mr Trump for being the sitting president and the party leader. These costs included a payment of $ 196,000 to Alan Dershowitz, the attorney who was part of Mr. Trump’s defense team.

It is not clear what role the RNC will play in the impending impeachment, but the party’s coffers have benefited immensely from Mr. Trump’s aggressive fundraising as he spread conspiracy theories about electoral fraud. About 25 percent of the funds raised through Mr. Trump’s email and text messaging operations were earmarked for the RNC

Categories
Politics

Trump thought-about ousting Legal professional Common in push to overturn election

Trump considered ousting Attorney General in push to overturn election

President Donald J. Trump stops to speak to reporters as he boards Marine One and departs from the South Lawn at the White House.

The Washington Post | The Washington Post | Getty Images

Former President Donald Trump had planned earlier this month to oust Jeffrey Rosen as acting attorney general and replace him with a Justice Department attorney who would support his efforts to reverse the presidential election results, the New York Times reported on Friday.

The plan would have replaced Rosen with Jeffrey Clark, the attorney who ran the Department of Justice’s civil division. Clark would then have backed Trump’s unsubstantiated allegations of election fraud and put pressure on Georgia state officials to change the election result.

A Justice Department official familiar with the matter confirmed the Times’ report of Trump’s efforts to NBC News.

Trump’s plan ultimately failed to materialize after Justice Department officials agreed during a conference call that they would resign if Rosen was fired, the Times said.

Trump had asked Rosen to appoint special advisors to investigate his allegations of widespread electoral fraud as well as the Dominion voting machine company, but Rosen declined.

Trump attempted to pressure Georgia’s top polling officer to “find the scam” in December when investigating suspected election fraud in Cobb County. Allegations that state officials believed to be unfounded. Trump also called on Georgian Foreign Minister Brad Raffensperger to “find” votes to postpone the election in his favor.

In a statement to the Times, Clark categorically denied that he had devised a plan to oust Rosen or give recommendations for action based on factual inaccuracies found on the Internet.

The House has accused Trump of instigating an anti-government riot on Jan. 6 after deadly unrest in the Capitol. His impeachment proceedings against the Senate are due to begin in the week of February 8th.

Read the full Times report here

Categories
Politics

Trump pressures Georgia high election official to ‘discover’ votes and overturn Biden victory

Trump pressures Georgia top election official to 'find' votes and overturn Biden victory

In an exceptional phone call this weekend, President Donald Trump pressured Georgia’s Republican Secretary of State to overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s victory in the state by finding votes to shift the number in his favor, as received by NBC News.

Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger resisted pressure from Trump to change Georgia’s election results, even as the president made veiled threats of possible prosecution if denied. The call was made on Saturday.

Trump, who refused to allow the election, said during the call that he wanted to “find 11,780 votes” to change the outcome in Georgia.

He told Raffensperger, a Republican, that Georgia’s vote had dropped hundreds of thousands of votes and suggested that the Secretary of State announce that he had recalculated the numbers to show a Trump victory.

“Well, Mr. President, the challenge you have is the data you have is wrong,” Raffensberger replied, according to the record.

Raffensperger and the secretary’s general counsel, Attorney Ryan Germany, also pushed back on Trump’s claims that ballot papers had been destroyed or that Dominion had removed parts of voting machines in Georgia that were showing more Republican votes.

The contents of the phone call were first reported by the Washington Post.

Trump, referring to Saturday’s call in a tweet on Sunday morning, said Raffensperger could not answer his questions about alleged election fraud, saying, “He has no idea.” Raffensperger replied on Twitter, writing, “What you say is not true. The truth will come out.”

Bob Bauer, a senior adviser to President-elect Biden, slammed Trump’s actions in a statement on Sunday.

“We now have irrefutable evidence that a president is putting an official of his own party under pressure and threatening to induce him to overturn the legal, certified number of votes of one state and fabricate another in his place,” said Bauer. “It captures the whole, nefarious story of Donald Trump’s attack on American democracy.”

The Senate Minority Whip, Dick Durbin, D-IL, said in a statement that the call warranted a criminal investigation.

“President Trump’s taped conversation with Georgian Foreign Minister Raffensperger is more than a pathetic, rambling, delusional abuse. His shameful effort to intimidate an elected official into deliberately changing and misrepresenting the statutory votes in his state strikes in the heart of our democracy and deserves nothing less than a criminal investigation, “the statement said.

House Intelligence Committee chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Condemned Trump’s actions as a “despicable abuse of power” that may be incontestable.

“If it is potentially criminal, it may be incontestable. And even if there is no crime, it may be punishable,” Schiff told reporters on Sunday.

Justin Levitt, an expert on suffrage and a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles who was a former Justice Department official, believes Trump’s behavior in calling would be in violation of several laws if a prosecutor could prove the president did so white weren’t really thousands of countless ballots that would turn the election around.

These criminal violations could include a conspiracy to violate a federal electoral law that has been used in the past to prosecute electoral fraud and a violation of Georgian state law relating to incitement to electoral fraud, he said.

“It’s pretty appalling that the only question is whether the president is sufficiently detached from reality to believe he hasn’t committed a crime,” Levitt said.

The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment. During the call, President Raffensperger threatened possible legal ramifications if his demands were not met.

“You know what you did and you don’t report it,” Trump said during the call. “This is a criminal, this is a crime. And you cannot allow it. This is a great risk for you and for Ryan, your lawyer. This is a great risk.”

The call comes just days before two major Georgia Senate runoff elections, in which Democratic candidates’ victories in both races would turn control of the chamber, and less than a month before Biden’s inauguration. Trump is holding a rally for the Republican candidates on Monday.

Georgia is one of several states where the Trump campaign or the president’s supporters have fought unsuccessfully to change or invalidate the vote since Trump’s loss to Biden in the November election.

None of the lawsuits, recounts, or investigations in any state have identified the type of widespread electoral fraud or miscounts that would be required to reverse the election in Trump’s favor.

The number of votes in Georgia and other states since the November elections has already been confirmed, and the electoral college has confirmed Joe Biden’s victory.

Biden’s victory in Georgia was a big change in the Republican-controlled state as he was the first Democratic presidential candidate since Bill Clinton in 1992. After the first count showed Biden as the winner of the state, Georgia carried out a recount that showed the same result. Raffensperger confirmed the result on November 20th.

The tight profit margin and the presence of Republicans in key positions have made it a target in the Trump team’s efforts to change the election results. Trump has also pressured Governor Brian Kemp to help reverse the outcome, but Kemp said it was not legal for him to call a special legislative session to appoint a new list of presidential voters.

Biden’s victory is due to be confirmed by a joint congressional session on Wednesday, but a group of 11 Republican senators and elected senators, including Texas Senator Ted Cruz, want to delay the move, as do some members of the Republican House. Vice President Mike Pence “welcomed” the move to delay certification, according to his chief of staff, but others like Utah Senator Mitt Romney have been harshly critical of the plan.

Trump is expected to participate in anti-certification protests in Washington on Wednesday.

Categories
Politics

Trump, in Taped Name, Pressured Georgia Official to ‘Discover’ Votes to Overturn Election

Trump, in Taped Call, Pressured Georgia Official to ‘Find’ Votes to Overturn Election

At another point, when Mr. Trump claimed that a video of the vote count at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta revealed that an employee was guilty of blatant ballot filling, Mr. Raffensperger replied that the video was selectively edited by Mr. Trump’s attorney. Rudolph W. Giuliani and other lawyers.

“They cut and rolled the video and took it out of context,” said Raffensperger. “The events that took place are nowhere near what was projected.”

When Mr Germany told the President that some of the allegations had been examined by both the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and the FBI and found to be untrue, Mr Trump replied that the agents were false.

“Then they are incompetent,” he said. “There are only two answers – dishonesty or incompetence.”

Mr Raffensperger said Mr Trump’s allegation that ballot papers were scanned three times was false. “We conducted an audit and conclusively proved that they were not scanned three times,” he told the president.

The president seemed incapable of envisioning a reality in which he would lose Georgia and repeatedly rewound statistics that he said he won the state by “hundreds of thousands of votes”.

“You look at it by rally size, frankly,” said Mr Trump, adding that he wanted to go over some of the numbers. He claimed that 250,000 to 300,000 ballots were “mysteriously thrown into the reels,” a problem he said in Fulton County.

“We think if you check the signatures, a real signature check in Fulton County, you’ll find at least a few hundred thousand forged signatures,” the president said, citing one conspiracy theory after another.

“People have said it was the highest vote ever,” he told Mr. Raffensperger, claiming that the fraud cases were “many, many times” more than Mr. Biden’s profit margin. “The political people said there was no way they could beat me.”

Michael D. Shear reported from Washington and Stephanie Saul from New York.

Categories
Politics

Kevin McCarthy backs Supreme Court docket bid from Texas to overturn Biden wins

Kevin McCarthy backs Supreme Court bid from Texas to overturn Biden wins

Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Chairman of the U.S. Minority Group, speaks during a press conference with fellow U.S. Capitol Republicans on December 10, 2020 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington.

Erin Scott | Reuters

Kevin McCarthy, minority chairman of the House of Representatives, R-Calif., Along with 125 other Republican Congressmen, supported the Texas Supreme Court’s longstanding lawsuit against Joe Biden’s proposed presidential victory on Friday.

McCarthy, the senior Republican in the House of Representatives and a close ally of President Donald Trump, was included in a letter from the “Friend of the Court,” presided over by Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., Urging the Supreme Court to To review the case filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton earlier this week.

Paxton’s case accused Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin – four major swing states where Biden defeated Trump – of attesting “illegal election results”. Texas is asking the Supreme Court to state that the electoral college votes cast by voters in these four swing states “cannot be counted”.

The majority vote in the House’s GOP conference behind the Supreme Court offer to effectively reverse the outcome of the 2020 election came after all 50 states and Washington, DC confirmed their election results. Biden is expected to win 306 votes, compared to 232 for Trump.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., In a damning letter from her dear colleague, accused the Republicans of supporting the case of “electoral subversion that threatens our democracy”.

“This lawsuit is an act of GOP desperation that violates the principles enshrined in our American democracy,” wrote Pelosi.

“As members of Congress, we take a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution,” her letter said. “The Republicans are undermining the Constitution through their ruthless and fruitless assault on our democracy, which threatens to seriously undermine public confidence in our most sacred democratic institutions and slow our progress on the urgent challenges ahead.”

The Supreme Court has given no indication that it will hear the case and electoral law experts say the judges are highly unlikely to take him up. The unprecedented motion by one state to invalidate other states’ votes in a presidential election has never been granted.

Even so, the lawsuit was hyped up by Trump, who falsely claims he won re-election while refusing to admit Biden. Trump asked Wednesday to intervene in Paxton’s case.

Numerous other states where Trump won the referendum have also indicated their support for Paxton’s lawsuit, as have dozens of seated Republican members of the House – a group that McCarthy is now a part of.

Though news outlets scheduled the election for Biden weeks earlier and had less than a week for voters in their respective states to cast their votes, many Republicans were reluctant to acknowledge that Biden had won the election.

McCarthy was asked directly on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” Thursday whether he would accept Biden’s win and refused to give a yes-or-no answer.

“Look, voters have to go through this and get this out,” McCarthy said in his response. “The President must ensure that every legal vote is counted, every recount is carried out and every complaint is made [is being] heard in court. Once that’s done I think the election will be over and the voters will make their choice. “

McCarthy was not included in an earlier amicus letter filed in court on Thursday, also headed by Johnson and signed by 106 members of the Republican House.

Johnson said on Twitter that the 20 additional Republicans added to his last letter to the court had previously been left out because of a “typographical error”.

– CNBC’s Jacob Pramuk contributed to this report.

Categories
Politics

Supreme Courtroom rejects Trump backed lawsuit that sought to overturn Biden election victory

Supreme Court rejects Trump backed lawsuit that sought to overturn Biden election victory

United States President Donald Trump looks on during a ceremony to present wrestler Dan Gable with the Presidential Medal of Freedom in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on December 7, 2020.

Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

The United States Supreme Court on Friday rejected an offer tabled by Texas and backed by President Donald Trump in an attempt to undo Joe Biden’s election victories in key swing states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The ruling dealt a death blow to Trump’s desperate and unsuccessful efforts to undo Biden’s planned victory at the electoral college. It took three days for voters to cast their ballots in their respective states and for Biden’s victory to be finalized.

Suffrage experts said from the start that the lawsuit is unlikely to succeed. But Trump, who himself had applied to intervene in the case, had hyped Paxton’s lawsuit as “the big one”.

The court on Friday denied Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to file the lawsuit against the four battlefield states. The judges said Paxton didn’t have reasons to sue the other states over changes they made to their voting procedures amid the coronavirus pandemic.

“The Texas state’s application for permission to file a notice of appeal is denied due to a lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” the court said.

“Texas has shown no judicial interest in the way any other state conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as in dispute.”

Trump, who appointed three judges to the nine-member court, had said ahead of the November 3rd election that he believed the Supreme Court would ultimately decide the race.

“I think it is very important that we have nine judges,” Trump said shortly after the death of the liberal judiciary Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September.

Biden spokesman Mike Gwin said in a statement on Friday evening that the court had “decided and quickly rejected the recent attack by Donald Trump and his allies on the democratic process.”

“This is no surprise – dozens of judges, election officials from both parties and Trump’s own attorney general have rejected his baseless attempts to deny that he lost the election,” said Gwin. “The clear and authoritative victory of President-elect Biden will be confirmed by the electoral college on Monday and sworn in on January 20th.”

The Texas lawsuit asked the Supreme Court to invalidate the election results of the four battlefield states by stating that their votes “cannot be counted” in the electoral college.

Biden’s victories in the four states, which together had 62 votes, had brought him over the 270-vote threshold required to secure the presidency. Biden is expected to win 306 votes, compared to 232 for Trump.

If Texas had won the lawsuit, it would have canceled Biden’s victory.

Two of the most conservative Supreme Court justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, said in brief disagreement that they allowed Paxton’s lawsuit to be filed, but added that they would “grant no other relief” requested in the case .

“In my view, there is no discretion to refuse to file a notice of appeal in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction,” Alito wrote in a statement backed by Thomas. “I would therefore grant the request to file the notice of appeal, but would not grant any other relief, and I do not express an opinion on any other subject.”

More than a dozen states in which Trump won the referendum filed briefs in support of Texas’s action. More than 120 Republican members of Congress, including House Minority Chairman Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Filed similar Friend of the Court letters shortly thereafter.

But about two dozen states and territories that Biden had won filed their own pleadings against the Texas appeal.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., In a damning letter from her dear colleague on Friday afternoon, accused the Republicans of supporting the case of “electoral subversion that threatens our democracy”.

“This lawsuit is an act of GOP desperation that violates the principles enshrined in our American democracy,” wrote Pelosi.

“As members of Congress, we take a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution,” her letter said. “The Republicans are undermining the Constitution through their ruthless and fruitless assault on our democracy, which threatens to seriously undermine public confidence in our most sacred democratic institutions and slow our progress on the urgent challenges ahead.”

Rudy Giuliani, the attorney who spearheaded Trump’s efforts to reverse Biden’s victory through legal proceedings, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Senator Ben Sasse, a Republican from Nebraska who has clashed with Trump, said in a statement that the Supreme Court has finally “closed the book on the nonsense.”

“Since election night, a lot of people have puzzled voters by turning the Kenyan birther guy. ‘Chavez carved the election out of the grave conspiracy theories,’ but any rule of law American should take comfort that the Colonel The court – including all three tips from President Trump – closed the book on the nonsense, “he said.

Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel, who represented her state against Paxton’s lawsuit, said the ruling was “an important reminder that we are a nation of laws, and while some may bow to the wishes of a single person, they will.” Courts don’t do this. “

NBC News legal analyst Benjamin Wittes noted that while Alito and Thomas opposed the decision, they likely would have opposed it on the matter.

Categories
Politics

Battleground states urge Supreme Courtroom to reject Texas’ bid to overturn Biden wins

Battleground states urge Supreme Court to reject Texas' bid to overturn Biden wins

The battlefield states, whose results of the Texas presidential election are being challenged in the Supreme Court, urged judges Thursday not to take up the case.

The four states to which the lawsuit pertained warned in unusually harsh briefs that granting Texas’s unprecedented demand for “violence against the constitution” and “disenfranchises millions of voters”.

These states – Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia – all confirmed their election results, with Democrat Joe Biden defeating President Donald Trump.

Almost simultaneously, Washington, DC Attorney General Karl Racine filed a brief in the court on behalf of the District of Columbia and 22 states and territories in defense of the four states targeted by Texas.

This court friend was joined by California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Guam, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon. Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, US Virgin Islands, and Washington.

The flood of important briefings related to the case – including Trump’s own request to intervene – recalled the dramatic and ongoing polarization in the US just weeks after one of the most controversial elections.

Pennsylvania called Ken Paxton’s long-term attempt to overturn elections in other states “legally unreasonable” and “a violation of the principles of constitutional democracy” in his letter.

“Texas is trying to invalidate elections in four states to get results it disagrees with,” says Pennsylvania.

Dana Nessel, the Michigan attorney general, in her state’s statement, urged the court to immediately dismiss the Texas case.

“Otherwise this court would become the arbiter of all future national elections,” wrote Nessel.

“The basis of Texas’ claims rests on the allegation that Michigan violated its own electoral laws. Not true,” added Nessel. “That claim has been dismissed in Michigan federal and state courts, and just yesterday the Michigan Supreme Court denied a final attempt to move for review.”

Christopher Carr, the Georgia attorney general, told the court that Texas was “transferring Georgia’s electoral powers to the federal judiciary.”

“Respect for federalism and constitutionalism prohibits this transfer of power, but this court should never reach that issue,” he wrote.

The answers came a day after Trump asked the Supreme Court to let him intervene on the case. The president, who refuses to admit Biden, has hyped the Texas case as “the big one” – but electoral law experts say there’s little chance the court will allow it.

So far, the judges have not taken any action in this case. Despite Trump’s frequent appeals, the court has shown unwillingness to enter into any litigation related to the presidential election.

For example, the judges have not yet said whether they will hear a GOP challenge to postal ballot papers received in Pennsylvania after election day. On Tuesday, they rejected an appeal from a Trump ally who attempted to reverse the findings on that state in a one-line order with no disagreement noted.

Even so, Paxton’s case has raised hopes among Trump’s supporters, desperate for a full court order to cancel Biden’s planned victory. Large sections of the electorate are convinced by the President’s repeated, unproven, and often debunked claims that widespread electoral fraud influenced the election of Biden.

Seventeen states where Trump won the referendum fueled those views on Wednesday when they filed a pleading with the Supreme Court in support of the Texas case.

On Thursday afternoon, 106 Republican members of Congress, led by Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., Signed their own letter in support of Paxton’s lawsuit.

This mandate was written by Phillip Jauregui, an attorney for the Judicial Action Group, who states on his website that he is working for the “renewal of justice” and is calling for “a third great awakening”.

Trump and his electoral team have filed dozens of lawsuits in court to invalidate election results, and state lawmakers have appointed pro-Trump voters.

Many of these cases have already been dismissed – but Trump is still pursuing legal challenges in key states, even with less than a week left before voters meet to cast their votes.