Categories
Politics

Doug Mastriano’s Extraordinarily On-line Rise to Republicans’ Governor Nominee in Pa.

BLOOMSBURG, Pa. — In the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, Diane Fisher, a nurse from Weatherly, Pa., was surfing through videos on Facebook when she came across a livestream from Doug Mastriano, a Pennsylvania state senator.

Starting in late March 2020, Mr. Mastriano had beamed regularly into Facebook from his living room, offering his increasingly strident denunciations of the state’s quarantine policies and answering questions from his viewers, sometimes as often as six nights a week and for as long as an hour at a stretch.

“People were upset, and they were fearful about things,” Ms. Fisher said. “And he would tell us what was going on.”

Ms. Fisher told her family and her friends about what Mr. Mastriano billed as “fireside chats,” after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s radio broadcasts during the Depression and World War II. “The next thing you knew,” she recalled, “there was 5,000 people watching.”

Mr. Mastriano’s rise from obscure and inexperienced far-right politician to Republican standard-bearer in Pennsylvania’s governor’s race was swift, stunning and powered by social media. Although he is perhaps better known for challenging the results of the 2020 presidential election and calling the separation of church and state a “myth,” Mr. Mastriano built his foundation of support on his innovative use of Facebook in the crucible of the early pandemic, connecting directly with anxious and isolated Americans who became an uncommonly loyal base for his primary campaign.

He is now the GOP nominee in perhaps the most closely watched race for governor in the country, in part because it would place a 2020 election denier in control of a major battleground state’s election system. Both President Biden and former President Donald J. Trump are making campaign appearances in Pennsylvania this week. As the race enters its last months, one of the central questions is whether the online mobilization that Mr. Mastriano successfully wielded against his own party establishment will prove similarly effective against Josh Shapiro, his Democratic rival — or whether a political movement nurtured in the hothouse of right-wing social media discontent will be unable or unwilling to transcend it.

Mr. Mastriano has continued to run a convention-defying campaign. He employs political neophytes in key positions and has refused for months to interact with mainstream national and local reporters beyond expelling them from events. (His campaign did not respond to requests for comment for this article.)

He grants interviews almost exclusively to friendly radio and TV shows and podcasts that share Mr. Mastriano’s far-right politics, and continues to heavily rely on Facebook to reach voters directly.

“It is the best-executed and most radical ‘ghost the media’ strategy in this cycle,” said Michael Caputo, a former Trump campaign adviser, who said other Republican strategists were watching Mr. Mastriano’s example closely.

“It’s never been done before. He’s on a spacewalk,” he said. “And the question we’re all asking is, does he make it back to the capsule?”

Although Mr. Mastriano no longer hosts fireside chats, his campaign posts several times more often a day on Facebook than most candidates, according to Kyle Tharp, the author of the FWIW newsletter, which tracks digital politics. His campaign’s Facebook post engagements have been comparable to those of Mr. Shapiro, despite Mr. Shapiro’s spending far more on digital advertising.

“He is a Facebook power user,” Mr Tharp said.

But Mr. Mastriano’s campaign has done little to expand his reach outside his loyal base, even as polls since the primary have consistently shown him trailing Mr. Shapiro, Pennsylvania’s attorney general, albeit often narrowly. And Mr. Mastriano’s efforts to add to his audience on the right through advertising on Gab, a platform favored by white nationalists, prompted a rare retreat in the face of criticism last month.

A career Army officer until his retirement in 2017 and a hard-line social conservative, Mr. Mastriano won a special election for the State Senate in 2019 after campaigning on his opposition to what he described as the “barbaric holocaust” of legal abortion and his see that the United States is an inherently Christian nation whose Constitution is incompatible with other faiths. But he was known to few outside his district until he began his pandemic broadcasts in late March 2020.

In the live videos, Mr. Mastriano was unguarded and at times emotional, giving friendly shout-outs to familiar names in the chat window. His fireside chats arrived at a fertile moment on the platform, when conservative and right-wing activists were using Facebook to assemble new organizations and campaigns to convert discontent into action — first with the Covid lockdowns and, later, the 2020 election outcome.

Mr. Mastriano linked himself closely to these currents of activism in his home state, speaking at the groups’ demonstrations and events. A video he livestreamed from the first significant anti-lockdown rally on the steps of the State Capitol in Harrisburg in April 2020, armed with a selfie stick, eventually racked up more than 850,000 views.

After the presidential election was called for Mr. Biden on Nov. 7, 2020, Mr. Mastriano was greeted as a star at the first “Stop the Steal” rally at the capitol in Harrisburg that afternoon. He became one of the most prominent faces of the movement to overturn the election in Pennsylvania, working with Mr. Trump’s lawyers to publicize widely debunked claims regarding election malfeasance and to send a slate of “alternate” electors to Washington, on the spurious legal theory that they could be used to overturn the outcome. (He would later be present at the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, though there is no evidence that he entered the building.)

When Republican colleagues in the State Senate criticized those schemes and Mr. Mastriano by name, he pointed to the size of his online army.

“I have more followers on Facebook alone than all 49 other senators combined,” Mr. Mastriano told Steve Turley, a local right-wing podcast host, in an interview. “That any colleague or fellow Republican would think that it would be a good idea to throw me under the bus with that kind of reach — I mean, they’re just not very smart people.”

Mr. Mastriano was eventually removed from the chairmanship of a State Senate committee overseeing an investigation he had championed into the state’s election results, and he was later expelled from the Senate’s Republican caucus — episodes that burnished his credentials with supporters suspicious of the state’s GOP establishment . His campaign for governor, which he formally announced this January, has drawn on not only the base he has cultivated since 2020 but also on the right-wing grass-roots groups with whom he has made common cause on Covid and the 2020 election.

“That whole movement is rock-solid behind him,” said Sam Faddis, the leader of UnitePA, a self-described Patriot group based in Susquehanna County, Pa.

When UnitePA hosted a rally on Aug. 27 in a horse arena in Bloomsburg, bringing together a coalition of groups in the state dedicated to overhauling the election system they insist was used to steal the election from Mr. Trump, many of the activists who spoke offered praise for Mr. Mastriano and his candidacy. From the stage, Tabitha Valleau, the leader of the organization FreePA, gave detailed instructions for how to volunteer for Mr. Mastriano’s campaign.

The crowd of about 500, most of whom stayed for all of the nearly six-hour rally, was full of Mastriano supporters, including Ms. Fisher. “He helped us through a bad time,” she said. “He stuck with his people.”

Charlie Gerow, a veteran Pennsylvania Republican operative and candidate for governor who lost to Mr. Mastriano in May, said this loyally following what Mr. Mastriano’s greatest strength. “He’s leveraged that audience on every mission he’s undertaken,” he said.

But with recent polls showing Mr. Mastriano lagging between 3 and 10 points behind Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Gerow is among the strategists doubting his primary strategy will translate to a general electorate.

“I think it’s going to be important for him to run a more traditional campaign, dealing with the regular media even when it’s unpalatable and unfriendly,” Mr. Gerow said.

Mr. Mastriano has also drawn criticism for his efforts to expand his social-media reach beyond Facebook and Twitter into newer, fringier spaces on the right.

In July, the liberal watchdog group Media Matters noted that Mr. Mastriano, according to his campaign filings, had paid $5,000 to the far-right social media platform Gab, which gained notoriety in 2018 after the suspect charged in the shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, in which 11 people were killed, used the platform to detail his racist and anti-Semitic views and plans for the shooting. Gab’s chief executive, Andrew Torba, who lives in Pennsylvania, has made anti-Semitic statements himself and appeared at a white nationalist conference this spring.

Mr. Torba and Mr. Mastriano had praised each other in a podcast interview in May, after which Mr. Mastriano had spoken hopefully of Gab’s audience. “Apparently about a million of them are in Pennsylvania,” he said on his own livestream, “so we’ll have some good reach.”

Mr. Torba, who did not respond to emailed requests for comment, has continued to champion Mr. Mastriano, describing the Pennsylvania governor’s race as “the most important election of the 2022 midterms, because Doug is an outspoken Christian,” in a video he posted in late July. He added, “We’re going to take this country back for the glory of God.”

But after initially standing his ground, Mr. Mastriano finally bowed to sustained criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike and closed his personal account with Gab early this month, issuing a brief statement denouncing anti-Semitism.

This month Mr. Shapiro, who is Jewish, spent $1 million on TV ads highlighting Mastriano’s connections to Gab. “We cannot allow this to become normalized — Doug Mastriano is dangerous and extreme, and we must defeat him in November,” said Will Simons, a spokesman for the Shapiro campaign.

The push reflected a view that one of Mr. Mastriano’s core vulnerabilities lay in his vast online footprint, with its hours of freewheeling conversation in spaces frequented by far-right voices.

Still, some Democrats who watched Mr. Mastriano’s rapid rise at close range have cautioned against counting him out. “Mastriano’s been underestimated by his own party,” said Brit Crampsie, a political consultant who was until recently the State Senate Democrats’ spokeswoman. “I fear him being underestimated by the Democrats. I wouldn’t rule him out.”

Categories
Politics

SEC steps up analysis into ‘gamification’ of buying and selling with on-line brokers, Gary Gensler says

Former chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Gary Gensler, testifies at a US Senate Banking Committee hearing on systemic risk and market oversight on Capitol Hill in Washington on May 22, 2012.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on Friday that it is intensifying its investigation into gamification and behavioral prompts used by online brokers and investment advisors to encourage people to trade more stocks and other securities.

Wall Street’s top regulator said that rosy earnings forecasts can mislead investors from technology that in reality underestimates the risk of a particular investment or the chances of staggering returns.

“While new technologies allow us greater access and product choice, they also raise the question of whether we as investors are adequately protected when we trade and seek financial advice,” said SEC chairman Gary Gensler in a press release. “In many cases, these characteristics can encourage investors to trade more often, to invest in other products or to change their investment strategy.”

The SEC often seeks public comments before drafting new rules and regulations for Wall Street, which means Friday’s announcement, while procedural, could be a headache for industry leaders.

Robinhood Markets, the operator of a popular digital trading platform that has been under scrutiny for its client trading requests, fell as much as 1% to the day’s lows, according to the SEC report.

The commission said that online investment firms and brokers often use “predictive” analytics tools designed to show clients what they would make under optimal – but not necessarily likely – outcomes.

While brokers may disclose that their predictive models are no guarantees of future returns, Gensler would like to gather investors’ thoughts on game-like features on financial platforms, behavioral prompts, more frequent trading, and “other digital elements or features designed to interact with” retail investors on digital platforms. “

As part of the announcement, the SEC announced that it would collect public submissions for 30 days after the application and comment forms are made available online.

Gensler said he was particularly keen to hear from the public on two key issues.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

First, the SEC chairman would like to know how financial regulators should protect investors from a potential conflict of interest.

Online brokers make profits when their customers trade more often. Robinhood Markets, for example, makes part of its money by sending its customers’ orders to high-frequency traders for cash. This process is itself controversial and known on Wall Street as paying for the flow of orders.

But if game-like prompts or congratulatory messages from online brokers encourage customers to make more trades – and especially if more trades result in poor portfolio performance at slightly lower prices – should the SEC intervene?

Gensler’s second key question is a little more cerebral.

In essence, the SEC wants to answer: If the game-like or predictive prompts from brokers are producing optimal results and affecting how often clients trade, should the regulator treat those prompts in the app as formal investment recommendations or advice?

The SEC often seeks public comments before drafting new rules and regulations for Wall Street, which means Friday’s announcement, while procedural, could be a headache for industry leaders.

Despite the stellar growth of the millennials favorite stock trading app, Robinhood has faced regulatory headwinds when it comes to its digital engagement with its millions of clients.

The financial industry regulator imposed Robinhood in June with the highest fine ever of around $ 70 million. FINRA said its penalty came in response to Robinhood’s technical failures in March during a spike in trading frenzy, their lack of diligence in authorizing clients to place option trades, and providing misleading information to clients on issues such as margin trading .

CEO Vlad Tenev testified to the U.S. House of Representatives Financial Services Committee in February about the GameStop trading mania in early 2021.

Robinhood also paid the SEC $ 65 million after being charged with misleading clients about how the app makes money and fails to deliver the promised best execution of trades.

In response to the public backlash, Robinhood has since taken steps to address some of the controls, such as:

Become a smarter investor with CNBC Pro.
Get stock picks, analyst calls, exclusive interviews and access to CNBC TV.
Sign up to start a free trial today.

Categories
Entertainment

Baryshnikov Arts Middle to Proceed On-line Programming This Fall

Baryshnikov Arts Center will hold another free online season before welcoming audiences back to its theaters in spring. Mikhail Baryshnikov, who founded the institution in 2005, said the main reason for remaining virtual was a long-planned replacement of its building’s heating, ventilation and air-conditioning system, which is to get underway in fall.

The coming season will include the premieres of commissioned pieces by River L. Ramirez, a comedian and musician (Oct. 18 to Nov. 1); the dancer Sooraj Subramaniam (Nov. 1-15); Jordan Demetrius Lloyd, a New York City dance artist (Nov. 29 to Dec. 13); and the dance duo Molly Lieber and Eleanor Smith (Jan. 10-24).

This is the second round of new work that the center has supported during the pandemic. The first was streamed during its spring 2021 season, and featured pieces by Stefanie Batten Bland, Mariana Valencia and Bijayini Satpathy.

“Instead of doing virtual galas, we decided to celebrate artists and their creativity,” Baryshnikov said of the choice to focus on commissioning. This emphasis, he added, is in keeping with the center’s primary mission, which is to help artists develop and experiment “without commercial pressure.”

The choreographers Kyle Abraham and Liz Gerring will also present new dances through the center this fall. Each has made a duet in response to Merce Cunningham’s “Landrover” (1972). Their contributions, commissioned by the center and the Merce Cunningham Trust, will stream Sept. 20-30 in an online program alongside solos and duets from Cunningham’s work performed by Jacquelin Harris and Chalvar Monteiro of Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater.

Two filmed solos by the Swedish choreographer Mats Ek (streaming Oct. 4-14); and “Pigulim,” a filmed dance-theater work by Ella Rothschild, an Israeli choreographer and former Batsheva Dance Company performer (available Dec. 13-23), round out the announced slate.

For Baryshnikov, it has been “a pleasant surprise” to see that the performing arts can be successfully created, shared and enjoyed in digital forms. “Thousands of people have been watching the online programming and we got so many responses from all over the world,” he said.

There are creative benefits to filming work that would otherwise be presented live onstage as well. “We gave artists the opportunity to really be in charge of their own presentation,” he said. “It’s a new medium — you have to be a cameraman or a director besides being a choreographer or a composer or an instrumentalist or a singer.”

Categories
Health

New York Metropolis’s Vaccine Passport Plan Renews On-line Privateness Debate

When New York City announced on Tuesday that people will soon have to show evidence of at least one coronavirus vaccine to get into businesses, Mayor Bill de Blasio said the system was “simple – just show it and you’re in”.

The data protection debate, which rekindled the city, was less straightforward.

Vaccination records showing proof of vaccination, often in electronic form such as an app, are the foundation of Mr de Blasio’s plan. For months, these records – also known as health cards or digital health certificates – have been discussed around the world in order to provide a safe gathering for vaccinated people who are less at risk from the virus. New York will be the first U.S. city to include these passports in a vaccine mandate, and potentially trigger similar actions elsewhere.

But mainstreaming those credentials could also usher in an era of increasing digital surveillance, privacy researchers said. This is because vaccine passports can allow location tracking, although there are few rules about how people’s digital vaccine data can be stored and shared. While existing data protection laws restrict the exchange of information between medical providers, there is no such rule for uploading your own data to an app.

The moment is reminiscent of the months after the September 11, 2001 attacks, said privacy advocates. Back then, changes in the name of national security had lasting effects, including taking off shoes at airports and the data collection made possible by the Patriot Act.

Without security, presenting a digital vaccination record every time people enter a public place could result in a “global map of the people,” said Allie Bohm, a political advisor to the New York Civil Liberties Union. The information could be used for profit by third parties or disclosed to law enforcement or immigration authorities, she said.

“How do we make sure that in 20 years we won’t say, ‘Well, there was Covid, so now I have this passport on my cell phone, which is also my driver’s license and also all the health records I have ever had? and every time I go to a store, do I have to leaf through it? ‘”said Ms. Boehm.

She added that the passports could particularly disadvantage groups who are more concerned about privacy, including those without papers. The New York Civil Liberties Union and other advocacy groups have supported laws to prevent vaccination records from being shared with law enforcement and to ensure passports don’t become permanent health trackers.

Vaccination records were introduced in the United States largely without a national framework. President Biden has ruled out a national vaccination record so that states, cities and private companies can decide if and how to have their own electronic systems to keep track of people who have been vaccinated.

Some companies that have developed digital vaccination records have tried to forestall privacy concerns. Over 200 private and public organizations recently joined the Immunization Card Initiative, a coalition aimed at standardizing the collection and protection of vaccination data.

Many developers said they went out of their way to make sure the passports didn’t break the privacy boundaries. Clear Secure, a security company that has created a health passport that is used by over 60 organizations, including many sports venues, said that its users’ health information has been “treated with the utmost care” and protected by a variety of tools. Employers or venues can only see a red or green signal that indicates whether a user has been vaccinated, it said.

The Commons Project, a non-profit organization that developed a vaccine passport called CommonPass, stores vaccine and test data on users’ phones and only temporarily uploads the information to a server to verify that a traveler meets the requirements. Airlines that have introduced CommonPass, including JetBlue and Lufthansa, can only see if a passenger has been cleared for travel, it said.

JP Pollak, a co-founder of the Commons Project, said the group’s vaccination record is “trustworthy” as users’ data has not been stored in the cloud and the passport restricts the information companies can see.

But while vaccine passports are still in the making, Covid-19 contact tracing apps that were introduced earlier in the pandemic have already been used by more authoritarian countries in a way that raises privacy issues. That gives researchers little confidence about how those vaccine passports might be used later.

For example, in China, a program called “reportInfoAndLocationToPolice” within the Alipay Health Code, used by the Chinese government to assess people’s health, sends a person’s location, city name, and identification code number to a server once the user agrees software access to personal data.

In Singapore, officials said in January that data from the country’s coronavirus contact tracing system had been used in a criminal investigation, despite leaders originally saying it was only used for contact tracing. In February, Singapore passed law restricting such use to “serious” criminal investigations.

“One of the things we don’t want is that we normalize surveillance in an emergency and we can’t get rid of it,” said Jon Callas, the director of technology projects at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights group.

Although such incidents do not occur in the United States, researchers already see potential for a handover. Several pointed to New York City, where proof of compulsory vaccination begins August 16 and will be enforced from September 13.

For evidence, people can use their paper vaccination cards, the NYC Covid Safe app, or another app called the Excelsior Pass. The Excelsior Pass was developed by IBM under an estimated $ 17 million contract with New York State.

To receive the pass, people upload their personal information. In the standard version of the pass, companies and third parties only see the validity of the pass and the name and date of birth of the person.

On Wednesday, the state announced the “Excelsior Pass Plus”, which not only shows whether a person has been vaccinated, but also provides additional information on when and where they were vaccinated. Companies that scan Pass Plus “may have the ability to save or retain the information it contains,” according to New York State.

The Excelsior Pass also has a “Phase 2” which could include expanding the use of the app and adding more information such as personal information and other health records that companies could review upon entry.

IBM said it used blockchain technology and encryption to protect user data, but didn’t say how. The company and New York State did not respond to requests for comment.

Mr de Blasio told WNYC in April that he understands the privacy concerns surrounding the Excelsior Pass but believes it will still “play an important role”.

Some federal states and cities are proceeding cautiously for the time being. More than a dozen states, including Arizona, Florida, and Texas, have announced bans on vaccination records in the past few months. The mayors of San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Seattle also said they would hold back on passport programs.

Some groups of companies and companies that have introduced vaccine passports said the privacy concerns were legitimate but addressable.

Airlines for America, an industrial trade group, said it supported vaccine passports and urged the federal government to put in place privacy standards. The San Francisco Chamber of Commerce, which helps its members work with Clear, said it was preferable to use the tools to ensure that only vaccinated people enter stores than to have companies close again when virus cases rise.

“People’s privacy is precious,” said Rodney Fong, President of the Chamber, but “when it comes to saving lives, privacy becomes a little less important.”

Categories
Health

The Most Influential Spreader of Coronavirus Misinformation On-line

For the past ten years, Dr. Mercola built a huge company to promote natural health regimens, spread and benefit from anti-vaccination content, said researchers who studied its network. In 2017, he filed an affidavit claiming his net worth was “over $ 100 million”.

And instead of saying directly online that vaccines aren’t working, Dr. Mercola’s posts often ask specific questions about her safety and discuss studies that other doctors have refuted. Facebook and Twitter have allowed some of its posts to be kept cautious, and companies have struggled to establish rules to remove nuanced posts.

“He was breathed new life through social media, which he cleverly and ruthlessly exploited to captivate people,” said Imran Ahmed, director of the Center for Countering Digital Hate, which investigates misinformation and hate speech. His “Disinformation Dozen” report has been quoted in Congressional hearings and by the White House.

In an email, Dr. Mercola, it is “quite strange for me that I am being referred to as number 1 in disseminating misinformation”. Some of his Facebook posts were only liked by hundreds of people, he said, so he didn’t understand “how the relatively small number of shares in Biden’s multi-billion dollar vaccination campaign could so devastate”.

The efforts against him are political, added Dr. Mercola added, accusing the White House of “illegal censorship through collusion with social media companies.”

He did not elaborate on whether his claims about the coronavirus were real. “I am the lead author of a peer-reviewed publication on vitamin D and the risk of Covid-19 and I have the right to inform the public by sharing my medical research,” he said. He failed to identify the publication, and The Times was unable to verify his claim.

Updated

July 24, 2021, 10:55 a.m. ET

Dr. Mercola is from Chicago and started a small private practice 1985 in Schaumburg, Illinois. He switched to naturopathy in the 1990s and opened his main website Mercola.com to share his treatments, cures and advice. The website urges people to “take control of your health”.

Categories
Health

Elizabeth Holmes swag gross sales hovering on-line

When it comes to fame and shame, former Theranos CEO Elizabeth Holmes has apparently cornered the market.

Internet vendors cash in on mugs, t-shirts, and even shower curtains in the weeks leading up to their August criminal fraud trial.

A review of the online stores shows more than 50 offers of Holmes and Theranos items on Etsy, Poshmark, eBay and Redbubble.

One of the more unique items is an authentic Theranos lab coat, which is listed for $ 17,000.

Once a Silicon Valley darling, Holmes is faced with federal referral fraud and a conspiracy to suspect referral fraud related to allegedly misleading investors, patients, and doctors about her company’s blood testing technology.

But customers rave about their product purchases on social media.

In a TikTok, a young woman poses in a mirror with a pink t-shirt that says “Elizabeth Holmes is my #GirlBoss”.

Another TikToker shows a mug with Holmes on one side and Theranos on the other. She says, “I really wish Elizabeth Holmes had an MLM so that I could join.” An MLM is a controversial, multi-level marketing operation that the US Federal Trade Commission warns of being a pyramid scheme.

And another pulls a t-shirt out of a package and says, “Y’all it’s here. The Queen of Theranos, Elizabeth Holmes.”

A search on Instagram and Twitter also shows customers posing with their goods.

Elizabeth Holmes, Founder and CEO of Theranos.

David Orrell | CNBC

Holmes, who is pregnant and due next month, faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted. She has pleaded not guilty to the charges. Before Theranos’ demise, her image was seemingly everywhere and she even landed on the cover of Forbes.

Today, despite a tarnished image and an upcoming 13-week trial, their brand is apparently still popular.

“It doesn’t surprise me, Elizabeth Holmes was a very inspiring person,” says Mark Macias, founder of Macias PR. “She was the youngest billionaire, self-made entrepreneur, and although we found out it was supposedly a scam – she was selling something revolutionary.”

Anthony, owner of Finance Memes Etsy shop, says sales of his Holmes items have increased since February. Anthony asked CNBC not to use his last name for fear of jeopardizing his employment.

“You can see it at Wall Street Bets – people like to talk about how much they lost,” said Anthony. “There’s an obsession with cheating, gambling, and taking bad risks. Everyone loves a good bad guy.”

A mug labeled “Theranos Early Investor” is the most popular item in his Etsy shop, according to Anthony. “It’s a little more reserved, you can put it in your drawer when your boss comes over.” Anthony says he has had over 200 visits to the cup in the past few months.

“There will always be people on the fringes who want to express themselves, take on the establishment and point the finger at them,” Macias said. However, he warns, “If you want a brand that will last, it is better to be famous. Infamy is short, it can ruin and destroy a brand.”

For Holmes, every image she projects is eternal.

As MSNBC columnist James Surowiecki wrote in a recent article, “On the way up and the way down, one thing about Elizabeth Holmes has remained constant: people are fascinated by her.”

Watch the video to learn more.

Categories
Entertainment

Three Views of ‘The Motherboard Suite,’ Indoors, Outdoor and On-line

“Does anyone out there know what Afrofuturism is?” Bill T. Jones asked on Saturday night in the middle of Times Square.

Jones is, among other things, Artistic Director of New York Live Arts, an experimental performing arts center in Chelsea. In that capacity, he performed on Saturday to discuss a free outdoor performance of “The Motherboard Suite,” a movement and musical work he directed for the center’s Live Ideas Festival.

I’m not sure anyone who watched this event got a much clearer sense of Afrofuturism, but the Saturday outdoor performance certainly sparked a renewed appreciation for live ideas and live art.

This year’s theme was “Changed Worlds: Black Utopia and the Age of Acceleration”. In keeping with a technology-related theme, the five-day festival was a mix of virtual and personal symposia and performances. In a virtual segment, Reynaldo Anderson, a co-curator, generally defined Afrofuturism as “the speculative product of the thinking of people in the African diaspora”.

He spoke of visions of the future, and the festival delivered them, although it also felt very timely as the city’s performing arts scene cautiously adjusts to new opportunities at this stage of the pandemic.

“The Motherboard Suite” is itself a hybrid: a 45-minute concert by the slam poet, who became musician Saul Williams, with titles from his albums “MartyrLoserKing” (2016) and “Encrypted & Vulnerable” (2019), published by six respected choreographers were interpreted in the flesh. I’ve experienced it in three ways. I saw its premiere on Thursday at the New York Live Arts theater. I stayed at home on Friday and met him virtually. On Saturday I ventured into Times Square for the outdoor show.

The Thursday show was a milestone, the first live performance in the theater since last March.

There were about 30 of us in the audience, taking up about one-sixth of the venue’s seats. Being there felt excitingly strange and dauntingly familiar, and also excitingly familiar and dauntingly strange.

For one set, the show had an installation by Jasmine Murrell with mirrored rock and soil formations in the form of hands or giant cacti. It reminded me of a desert planet on the original Star Trek. Murrell was also responsible for the headdresses some of the choreographers wore – who, with the exception of Shamel Pitts, performed their own works (Pitts was danced by Morgan Bobrow-Williams and Maria Bauman was accompanied by Samantha Speis). The headgear was eye-catching: one like a giant brain or a large afro, another like a cubist head made from shards of records.

But those theatrical elements (including flashing and neon lights from Serena Wong) felt superficial. Williams, charismatic in his sunglasses, delivered his compositions on a rear platform (along with multi-instrumentalist Aku Orraca-Tetteh), and each choreographer recorded a song or two, mostly alone. The more conspicuous among them, especially Jasmine Hearn, caught attention, but the connections between sections and cast seemed terribly constructed and unimaginative, with ensemble pieces on the order of “Now Everyone Freezes in One Pose”. Live is not always amazing.

The virtual option came through a platform called Interspace. Each visitor is represented by a kind of mobile nameplate, an avatar that you can press with the arrow key around a 3D diagram of a theater complex. You can go to a gallery and see an extensive visual art exhibition from the Black Speculative Arts Movement. You can chat, virtually meet other visitors, start a conversation, or overhear someone else’s before and after entering the digital theater for a digital show.

Watching the show this way was like watching another video of a live performance, only the stream was half frozen for me. Especially after experiencing the flawed but real thing the night before, the virtual version felt less like a utopian taste of the future than like an already half-outdated world that we hopefully won’t have to live in.

For much of prepandemic life, life returns, as attested by the exciting and frightening crowds the size of a prepandemic in Times Square. There “The Motherboard Suite” didn’t have its own sets or lighting on Saturday. It had a superior replacement: the Blade Runner electronic billboards. Sometimes the roar of motorcycles or the drumming and chanting of Hare Krishnas accidentally sounded with the score, but the energy of the place continuously weighed on the performance.

The performance took place in a cordoned off area of ​​Father Duffy Square. This time the choreographers did not sit up and down, but on the stage, observing and interacting with one another. And that change, along with the increase in audience (potentially large, if small in practice), changed everything. The show came to life.

Even mishaps were transformed. During Marjani Forté-Saunders’ solo, her headdress – a top hat draped in elephantine spools of cloth with a face – began to untangle. She dropped it and was freed into new powers. That accident opened connections in the choreography: the way Kayla Farrish exploded after taking off her cubist vinyl helmet, or the way Bobrow-Williams’s hands felt like he was having trouble getting himself off after taking it off for his missing giant brain to adapt to it could be without it.

Only d. Sabela Grimes seemed invigorated by his troublesome costume: a body-covering, sophisticated pony in purple and white with a ski mask framed by cowrie shells. But its popping isolations also drew a greater shamanic force from the street energy of Times Square. The show was less about cosplay and more about being together.

In a way, the elaborately costumed characters of “The Motherboard Suite” fit right in with the costumed tourist attractions of Times Square. But Williams’ sometimes profane texts – mostly words of opposition to the capitalist fantasy around him, the seductive status quo – played a much larger role than in the other, less public spaces. His final list of things to hack into (capitalism, sexuality, God) felt less like preaching to the choir. Location is important. If the show didn’t start a revolution, it was a good introduction to what New York Live Arts can be.

Categories
Business

On-line Dishonest Expenses Upend Dartmouth Medical Faculty

HANOVER, N.H. — Sirey Zhang, a first-year student at Dartmouth’s Geisel School of Medicine, was on spring break in March when he received an email from administrators accusing him of cheating.

Dartmouth had reviewed Mr. Zhang’s online activity on Canvas, its learning management system, during three remote exams, the email said. The data indicated that he had looked up course material related to one question during each test, honor code violations that could lead to expulsion, the email said.

Mr. Zhang, 22, said he had not cheated. But when the school’s student affairs office suggested he would have a better outcome if he expressed remorse and pleaded guilty, he said he felt he had little choice but to agree. Now he faces suspension and a misconduct mark on his academic record that could derail his dream of becoming a pediatrician.

“What has happened to me in the last month, despite not cheating, has resulted in one of the most terrifying, isolating experiences of my life,” said Mr. Zhang, who has filed an appeal.

He is one of 17 medical students whom Dartmouth recently accused of cheating on remote tests while in-person exams were shut down because of the coronavirus. The allegations have prompted an on-campus protest, letters of concern to school administrators from more than two dozen faculty members and complaints of unfair treatment from the student government, turning the pastoral Ivy League campus into a national battleground over escalating school surveillance during the pandemic.

At the heart of the accusations is Dartmouth’s use of the Canvas system to retroactively track student activity during remote exams without their knowledge. In the process, the medical school may have overstepped by using certain online activity data to try to pinpoint cheating, leading to some erroneous accusations, according to independent technology experts, a review of the software code and school documents obtained by The New York Times.

Dartmouth’s drive to root out cheating provides a sobering case study of how the coronavirus has accelerated colleges’ reliance on technology, normalizing student tracking in ways that are likely to endure after the pandemic.

While universities have long used anti-plagiarism software and other anti-cheating apps, the pandemic has pushed hundreds of schools that switched to remote learning to embrace more invasive tools. Over the last year, many have required students to download software that can take over their computers during remote exams or use webcams to monitor their eye movements for possibly suspicious activity, even as technology experts have warned that such tools can be invasive, insecure, unfair and inaccurate.

Some universities are now facing a backlash over the technology. A few, including the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, recently said they would cease using the exam-monitoring tools.

“These kinds of technical solutions to academic misconduct seem like a magic bullet,” said Shaanan Cohney, a cybersecurity lecturer at the University of Melbourne who researches remote learning software. But “universities which lack some of the structure or the expertise to understand these issues on a deeper level end up running into really significant trouble.”

At Dartmouth, the use of Canvas in the cheating investigation was unusual because the software was not designed as a forensic tool. Instead, professors post assignments on it and students submit their homework through it.

That has raised questions about Dartmouth’s methodology. While some students may have cheated, technology experts said, it would be difficult for a disciplinary committee to distinguish cheating from noncheating based on the data snapshots that Dartmouth provided to accused students. And in an analysis of the Canvas software code, The Times found instances in which the system automatically generated activity data even when no one was using a device.

“If other schools follow the precedent that Dartmouth is setting here, any student can be accused based on the flimsiest technical evidence,” said Cooper Quintin, senior staff technologist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital rights organization, who analyzed Dartmouth’s methodology.

Seven of the 17 accused students have had their cases dismissed. In at least one of those cases, administrators said, “automated Canvas processes are likely to have created the data that was seen rather than deliberate activity by the user,” according to a school email that students made public.

The 10 others have been expelled, suspended or received course failures and unprofessional-conduct marks on their records that could curtail their medical careers. Nine pleaded guilty, including Mr. Zhang, according to school documents; some have filed appeals.

Some accused students said Dartmouth had hamstrung their ability to defend themselves. They said they had less than 48 hours to respond to the charges, were not provided complete data logs for the exams, were advised to plead guilty though they denied cheating or were given just two minutes to make their case in online hearings, according to six of the students and a review of documents.

Five of the students declined to be named for fear of reprisals by Dartmouth.

Duane A. Compton, the dean of the Geisel School, said in an interview that its methods for identifying possible cheating cases were fair and valid. Administrators investigated carefully, he said, and provided accused students with all the data on which the cheating charges were based. He denied that the student affairs office had advised those who said they had not cheated to plead guilty.

Dr. Compton acknowledged that the investigation had caused distress on campus. But he said Geisel, founded in 1797 and one of the nation’s oldest medical schools, was obligated to hold its students accountable.

“We take academic integrity very seriously,” he said. “We wouldn’t want people to be able to be eligible for a medical license without really having the appropriate training.”

Updated 

May 8, 2021, 5:12 p.m. ET

Instructure, the company that owns Canvas, did not return requests for comment.

In January, a faculty member reported possible cheating during remote exams, Dr. Compton said. Geisel opened an investigation.

To hinder online cheating, Geisel requires students to turn on ExamSoft — a separate tool that prevents them from looking up study materials during tests — on the laptop or tablet on which they take exams. The school also requires students to keep a backup device nearby. The faculty member’s report made administrators concerned that some students may have used their backup device to look at course material on Canvas while taking tests on their primary device.

Geisel’s Committee on Student Performance and Conduct, a faculty group with student members that investigates academic integrity cases, then asked the school’s technology staff to audit Canvas activity during 18 remote exams that all first- and second-year students had taken during the academic year. The review looked at more than 3,000 exams since last fall.

The tech staff then developed a system to recognize online activity patterns that might signal cheating, said Sean McNamara, Dartmouth’s senior director of information security. The pattern typically showed activity on a Canvas course home page — on, say, neurology — during an exam followed by activity on a Canvas study page, like a practice quiz, related to the test question.

“You see that pattern of essentially a human reading the content and selecting where they’re going on the page,” Mr. McNamara said. “The data is very clear in describing that behavior.”

The audit identified 38 potential cheating cases. But the committee quickly eliminated some of those because one professor had directed students to use Canvas, Dr. Compton said.

In emails sent in mid-March, the committee told the 17 accused students that an analysis showed they had been active on relevant Canvas pages during one or more exams. The emails contained spreadsheets with the exam’s name, the test question number, time stamps and the names of Canvas pages that showed online activity.

Almost immediately, questions emerged over whether the committee had mistaken automated activity on Canvas for human activity, based on a limited subset of exam data.

Geisel students said they often had dozens of course pages open on Canvas, which they rarely logged out of. Those pages can automatically generate activity data even when no one is looking at them, according to The Times’s analysis and technology experts.

School officials said that their analysis, which they hired a legal consulting firm to validate, discounted automated activity and that accused students had been given all necessary data in their cases.

Class Disrupted

Updated May 5, 2021

The latest on how the pandemic is reshaping education.

But at least two students told the committee in March that the audit had misinterpreted automated Canvas activity as human cheating. The committee dismissed the charges against them.

In another case, a professor notified the committee that the Canvas pages used as evidence contained no information related to the exam questions his student was accused of cheating on, according to an analysis submitted to the committee. The student has appealed.

The committee has also not provided students with the wording of the exam questions they were accused of cheating on, complete Canvas activity logs for the exams, the amount of time spent on each Canvas page and data on whether the system flagged their page activity as automated or user-initiated, according to documents.

Dartmouth declined to comment on the data issues, citing the appeals.

Mr. Quintin of the Electronic Frontier Foundation compared Dartmouth’s methods to accusing someone of stealing a piece of fruit in a grocery store by presenting a snapshot of that person touching an orange, but not releasing video footage showing whether the person later put back the orange, bought it or pocketed it without paying.

Dr. Compton said the committee’s dismissal of cases over time validated its methodology.

The fact that we had a large number of students and we were very deliberate about eliminating a large, large fraction or majority of those students from consideration,” he said, “I think actually makes the case well for us trying to be really careful about this.”

Tensions flared in early April when an anonymous student account on Instagram posted about the cheating charges. Soon after, Dartmouth issued a social media policy warning that students’ anonymous posts “may still be traced back” to them.

Around the same time, Geisel administrators held a virtual forum and were barraged with questions about the investigation. The conduct review committee then issued decisions in 10 of the cases, telling several students that they would be expelled, suspending others and requiring some to retake courses or repeat a year of school at a cost of nearly $70,000.

Many on campus were outraged. On April 21, dozens of students in white lab coats gathered in the rain in front of Dr. Compton’s office to protest. Some held signs that said “BELIEVE YOUR STUDENTS” and “DUE PROCESS FOR ALL” in indigo letters, which dissolved in the rain into blue splotches.

Several students said they were now so afraid of being unfairly targeted in a data-mining dragnet that they had pushed the medical school to offer in-person exams with human proctors. Others said they had advised prospective medical students against coming to Dartmouth.

“Some students have built their whole lives around medical school and now they’re being thrown out like they’re worthless,” said Meredith Ryan, a fourth-year medical student not connected to the investigation.

That same day, more than two dozen members of Dartmouth’s faculty wrote a letter to Dr. Compton saying that the cheating inquiry had created “deep mistrust” on campus and that the school should “make amends with the students falsely accused.”

In an email to students and faculty a week later, Dr. Compton apologized that Geisel’s handling of the cases had “added to the already high levels of stress and alienation” of the pandemic and said the school was working to improve its procedures.

The medical school has already made one change that could reduce the risk of false cheating allegations. For remote exams, new guidelines said, students are now “expected to log out of Canvas on all devices prior to testing.”

Mr. Zhang, the first-year student, said the investigation had shaken his faith in an institution he loves. He had decided to become a doctor, he said, to address disparities in health care access after he won a fellowship as a Dartmouth undergraduate to study medicine in Tanzania.

Mr. Zhang said he felt compelled to speak publicly to help reform a process he found traumatizing.

“I’m terrified,” he said. “But if me speaking up means that there’s at least one student in the future who doesn’t have to feel the way that I did, then it’s all worthwhile.”

Categories
Health

Get pleasure from an On-line Live performance – The New York Occasions

As many cities across the country open up, the state of entertainment remains divided. Socially distant indoor shows have returned to live music venues like the City Winery in New York and the Nutty Brown Amphitheater in Austin, while NY PopsUp has a range of indoor and outdoor performances in locations across New York state that lead to the reopening of Broadway. (As part of the deal, Nathan Lane and Savion Glover were the first artists to grace a Broadway stage since last March, while Amy Schumer, Chris Rock and Hugh Jackman are slated for future events.)

But until vaccination numbers rise, livestream shows will continue. And as the traditional concert season approaches, the scope increases. For example, the Glastonbury Festival (which won’t happen in person until 2022) is hosting a concert with usual high profile performers. But while there might be signs of recovery in the air in some places, Covid stays very much on your mind. Selena Gomez will host a Global Citizen concert to promote vaccination while famous indie artists come together to honor songwriter Adam Schlesinger, who died of Covid-19 in 2020. Cross-continental shows.

“Adam Schlesinger: A Musical Celebration”

The music, film and TV community mourned Adam Schlesinger, founding member of Fountains of Wayne and Emmy and Grammy winner, who wrote songs for films like “Shallow Hal” and “That Thing You Do!”. Artists such as Courtney Love, Sean Ono Lennon, Michelle Branch and Micky Dolenz will perform his songs at a memorial concert that will benefit MusiCares, the non-profit organization for musicians in need, and the venue Bowery Electric. May 5, 8 p.m. EST, tickets are $ 20; RollingLivestudios.com/pages/box-office

Van Morrison

The day after the release of his latest album “Latest Record Project: Number 1”, the Northern Irish artist will perform songs from it as well as some of the most famous hits in his first virtual concert. Morrison has made waves in the past few months with his anti-lockdown stance that included a threat to sue the Northern Irish Department of Health and recently released three songs dealing with the shutdown, including “No More Lockdown.” None of the three will appear on the new album. May 8, 3 p.m. EST, tickets start at $ 14.99; nugs.net

Categories
Business

English Soccer Proclaims Social Media Boycott to Protest On-line Abuse

English football officials said Saturday they would hold a social media blackout this coming weekend to protest “the ongoing and ongoing discriminatory abuse that players and many others have received online related to football”.

The boycott is supported by a coalition of groups including the Premier League, the richest and most famous football league in the world, but also the English Football Association. the two best professional levels in men’s and women’s football; Referee; the country’s players’ union and others.

The action is the most direct effort by a sport to date to pressure social media companies like Twitter, Instagram and Facebook to take action against online abuse. It follows a season in which players, clubs, team leaders, referees, commentators and others are active and was the target of abuse.

The social media boycott also follows a week of anger and street protests against top clubs and their owners who tried – and failed – to create a breakaway European Super League that would have sealed them off from many structures, including the pay system Sustaining football for a century. At each of the protests there were vitriolic demands on the owners of teams to sell.

Cases of harassment have been well documented online. In February, Arsenal striker Eddie Nketiah posted a picture on Twitter entitled “Work with a Smile!”

The tweet was racially abused by a Twitter user who told Nketiah, who is black, to leave the club. Twitter responded by permanently banning the user’s account, Sky Sports reported.

Such harassment was instigated not only by fans but also by the club’s social media accounts. In December, commentator and former soccer player Karen Carney deleted her Twitter account after receiving a wave of online abuse.

After Leeds United beat West Brom 5-0, Carney wondered on Amazon Prime Video Sport whether Leeds would “blow up” at the end of the season. A clip of her comment was shared on the Leeds team’s Twitter account, which dumped a lot of hateful messages for Carney.

Many on Twitter defended her and criticized the team’s social media people, including former Leeds captain Rio Ferdinand, who demanded that the tweet be deleted.

Bethany England, a Chelsea forward, called on the Leeds social media team for “cruel behavior”.

“Cyber ​​bullies an expert and opens her up to mass online abuse for doing her job and speaking out!” England said.

In February, the top executives of the Football Association – the English Football Association – the Premier League and other organizations wrote an open letter to Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter and Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, urging those responsible to do so an end to the “level of malicious, offensive abuse” emanating from users on their platforms.

“The reality is that your platforms continue to be havens for abuse,” the football managers wrote. “Your inaction has made the anonymous perpetrators believe that they are unreachable.”

In the past, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter have taken steps such as: B. the temporary or permanent ban on users, but the problems of online abuse have continued to arise.

In a press release announcing the social media boycott, which will run from Friday afternoon through Monday, English football urged the UK to “put in place tough laws to keep social media companies out for what is on their platforms happens to make you more accountable “.

In the statement, Richard Masters, the Premier League executive director, said the league would continue to urge social media companies to make changes to prevent online abuse.

“Racist behavior of any kind is unacceptable and the appalling abuse that players receive on social media platforms must not continue,” said Masters. “Football is a diverse sport that brings together communities and cultures from all areas. This diversity strengthens competition.”

It’s not the first time football has tried to shed light on racism.

For example, players and coaches in the Premier League and other top leagues have kneeled the whole season before kick-off to support the Black Lives Matter movement – at the suggestion of the league team captains and with the support of league officials.

But some players and even entire teams who are frustrated because there is no concrete progress on racial issues and who feel that the gesture has become more performative than productive have recently stopped participating.

Crystal Palace striker Wilfried Zaha said he had come to view kneeling as “demeaning” and said he would stop and focus his efforts on other areas. Brentford, a team in England’s second division championship, stopped kneeling before the games in February. While the players said in a statement that they still support the anti-racism effort, they said, “We believe we can use our time and energy to promote racial equality in other ways.”

The social media blackout will take place while a slew of games are played across multiple leagues, including one between Manchester United and Liverpool, the defending champions of the Premier League.

Edleen John, director of international relations at the football association, said English football will not stop pushing for change after next weekend.

“It is simply unacceptable that people throughout English football and society should continue to be exposed to discriminatory abuse online on a daily basis with no real consequences for the perpetrators,” said John. “Social media companies must be held accountable if they continue to fail to fulfill their moral and social responsibilities to solve this endemic problem.”