Categories
Health

Airstrike Damages Gaza’s Solely Covid-19 Testing Lab, Officers Say

Since Covid-19 first appeared in the blocked Gaza Strip, the authorities have only been able to conduct a relatively small number of coronavirus tests due to the lack of medical care.

Now the only laboratory in Gaza processing test results is temporarily inoperable after an Israeli air strike nearby on Monday, Gaza officials said.

The strike, which targeted a separate building in Gaza City, sent splinters and debris flying across the street and damaged the laboratory and administrative offices of the Hamas-led health ministry, said Dr. Majdi Dhair, Director of the Department of Preventive Medicine at the Ministry.

A ministry official was hospitalized and in serious condition after being hit in the head by a splinter, said Dr. Dhair on Tuesday in a telephone interview.

“This attack was barbaric,” he said. “There’s no way to justify it.”

The Israeli army did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the strike. Since Israel began its bombing campaign in Gaza on May 10, the army has declared that its air strikes are aimed exclusively at militants and their infrastructure.

Dr. Dhair said he believed the equipment in the lab was intact, but stressed that it would take at least a day to clean up the damage and prepare him to run coronavirus tests again. In the meantime, the medical teams would stop doing tests.

Rami Abadla, director of the Infection Control Department of the Gaza Ministry, said the laboratory will also temporarily not be able to process results for other tests related to HIV, hepatitis C and other diseases.

Over the past week, Gaza authorities tested an average of 515 Palestinians for the virus every day. According to official data, only 1.9 percent of the two million people in Gaza were fully vaccinated on Monday, compared with 56 percent in Israel.

After an increase in cases in April, mainly due to the highly communicable coronavirus variant first identified in the UK, new infections in Gaza have recently dropped to manageable levels, health experts said. But with Israeli air strikes destroying buildings, causing widespread damage and killing more than 200 people by Monday, United Nations officials have warned coronavirus cases could re-emerge.

Unvaccinated Palestinians crowded into schools operated by the United Nations Relief Society in Gaza, turning them into de facto air raid shelters. Matthias Schmale, the head of operations at the UN agency, said last week that these schools “could become mass disseminators”.

Mr Schmale and the World Health Organization’s chief official in Gaza, Sacha Bootsma, also said that all vaccinations stopped when hostilities broke out and that any vaccine supply in the territory had been delayed by the closure of the border crossings in the Gaza Strip.

Categories
Health

Vaccinated People Could Go With out Masks in Most Locations, Federal Officers Say

John Moore, a virologist at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, said people would need to assess their own comfort levels in different situations, depending on the size of the congregation and the number of cases in the area.

“Would I go to a humble dinner party with vaccinated friends?” he said. “Absolutely. But going to a bar or a large crowd of people with a badly vaccinated condition – that would be uncomfortable without a mask.”

“I know people my age who are very, very upset about any kind of intermingling,” added Dr. Moore added, who said he was in his 60s. “It’s going to take a lot of adjustments, but I think it’s a good idea and appropriate for science.”

In a way, the agency is asking neighbors, coworkers, and total strangers to trust each other in order to do the right thing, some scientists noted. Throwing off masks can rekindle a national vaccination passport debate as immunity verification becomes increasingly important in unmasked settings such as offices and restaurants.

Ellie Murray, an epidemiologist at Boston University School of Public Health, said, “Basically, it depends on people monitoring people around them, or business owners checking vaccination status in some way, or just relying on some kind of honor to code.”

To justify the recommendations, agency officials cited several recent studies showing vaccines are more than 90 percent effective at preventing in-practice mild and serious illness, hospitalization and deaths from Covid-19.

Among them was a study of 6,710 health care workers in Israel, including 5,517 fully vaccinated workers, that found the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine 97 percent in preventing symptomatic infections among the fully vaccinated and 86 percent in preventing asymptomatic ones Infections was effective for them.

Categories
Politics

White Supremacists Prime Home Terror Risk, Officers Say

Attorney General Merrick B. Garland and Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas told Senators on Wednesday that the greatest domestic threat to the United States comes from what they both describe as “racially or ethnically motivated violent extremists”.

“Especially those who advocate the superiority of the white race,” Garland told the Senate Committee on Funds.

Cabinet secretaries’ appearances represented a dramatic change from the tone of the Trump administration, as the threat posed by white supremacists and similar groups was deliberately downplayed, in part to raise the profile of what former President Donald J. Trump posed as violent threats Radical denoted left groups.

Last year, the former head of Homeland Security’s Intelligence Department filed a whistleblower complaint accusing the department of blocking an intelligence report on the threat of violent racism and describing white supremacists as “exceptionally fatal in their heinous targeted attacks in recent years. “The official accused

“The department is taking a new approach to combating domestic violent extremism, both internally and externally,” Mayorkas told the senators on Wednesday.

While Justice and Homeland Security have long been involved in fighting violent extremism in the country, Biden government officials have stated that the January 6 pro-Trump riots in the Capitol created an urgent need to get stronger focus on domestic extremism.

But the Senate Republicans didn’t share that focus. Top Republican on the committee, Senator Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, said the Democrats politicized the issue by calling domestic violent extremists right-wing extremists. He equated the riots with the protests against police violence in the summer of 2020.

Other republicans on the committee grilled the attorney general and the chief of homeland security over border security and other immigration issues.

The Justice Department is investigating the January 6 riot and has arrested more than 430 people nationwide, Garland said. Only last week did prosecutors start informally negotiating plea agreements. Some of the defendants fought the charges.

Categories
Health

Prime U.S. Well being Officers Stress Urgency of Vaccinations

Senior U.S. health officials tried to reassure Americans on Sunday that the 10-day hiatus in using Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine showed how well safety surveillance is working for the Covid-19 vaccines, and shouldn’t help some Americans are reluctant to be shot.

“What we are going to see, and we are likely to see soon, is that people are going to realize that we take safety very seriously,” said Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the President’s top medical advisor on coronavirus, during an interview on ABC News This Week.

“We are out there trying to combat the level of vaccine hesitation that is still out there,” said Dr. Fauci. “And one of the real reasons people hesitate is because of concerns about the safety of the vaccine.”

What you need to know about the Johnson & Johnson US vaccine break

    • On April 23, an advisory panel to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention voted to lift a hiatus on Johnson & Johnson Covid vaccine and put a label on an extremely rare but potentially dangerous bleeding disorder.
    • Federal health officials are expected to officially recommend states lift the hiatus.
    • The vaccine was recently discontinued after reports of a rare bleeding disorder surfaced in six women who received the vaccine.
    • The overall risk of developing the disorder is extremely small. Women between the ages of 30 and 39 appear to be most at risk, with 11.8 cases per million doses. There were seven cases per million doses in women between 18 and 49 years of age.
    • Almost eight million doses of the vaccine have now been given. There was less than one case per million doses in men and women aged 50 and over.
    • Johnson & Johnson had also decided to postpone the launch of its vaccine in Europe for similar reasons, but later decided to continue its campaign after the European Union Medicines Agency announced the addition of a warning. South Africa, devastated by a contagious variant of the virus, also stopped using the vaccine, but later continued to use it.

On Friday, federal officials lifted a hiatus recommended on April 13 for the use of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine as some cases of a rare bleeding disorder had occurred, mostly in younger women. As of Friday, experts had identified 15 cases, including three deaths that were due to the extremely unusual clotting problem. A warning about the risk for the malfunction will be included for the company’s product.

Public health experts have raised concerns that Johnson & Johnson’s hiatus was particularly worrying, with many states relying on single-dose to expand vaccination to hard-to-reach rural areas and those at home, homeless, and on the College campuses were.

Some officials also feared the break would dampen vaccination rates, which are already falling in the country.

In NBC’s Meet the Press program, Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, raised the risk of a blood clot from the vaccine – less than 1 in 500,000 – with the risk of aspirin causing significant intestinal bleeding among people who take aspirin regularly.

“We’re talking about something that is about a thousand times less likely,” said Dr. Collins. “But we Americans are not that good at this kind of risk calculation.”

Many states have already announced that they will resume use of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. Almost 8 million people had received it before the break, and about 10 million cans were on the shelves across the country waiting to be dispensed.

Overall, more than 50 percent of adult Americans received at least one shot among the three vaccines available, said Dr. Fauci.

Both Dr. Fauci and Dr. Collins said it was critical that a high percentage of Americans be vaccinated to end the pandemic. “The more people you vaccinate, the more people you protect,” said Dr. Fauci. “When you vaccinate a critical number of people, you really have comprehensive protection for the entire community.”

Dr. Collins said the scientists knew the exact percentage of people with immunity, neither from the vaccine nor from antibodies generated by surviving a fight with the virus, that would be required to achieve herd immunity, especially as the coronavirus rises new variants mutate, which can be more contagious.

“But it’s around 70.85 percent up there,” he said. “And we’re not there yet.”

He said that being fully vaccinated was liberating.

“My wife and I were able to invite another couple to come over to our house for dinner and remove our masks as they were also vaccinated and had a normal conversation and hugging at the end of the evening,” said Dr. Collins. “That was so liberating. If you aren’t vaccinated, you are missing out on the chance to lift the fear that was there. “

When asked about calls to reduce restrictions on wearing masks outdoors, Dr. Fauci that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention may revise their recommendations soon. “I think it’s pretty reasonable that the risk in the open air is really, really little,” said Dr. Fauci. “I mean, if you’re a vaccinated person and you’re wearing a mask outdoors, the risk is obviously tiny.”

Categories
Politics

Biden Officers Place Hope in Taliban’s Want for Legitimacy and Cash

WASHINGTON – President Biden’s plan to withdraw American troops from Afghanistan has met with sharp criticism that it could facilitate a takeover by the Taliban, with brutal consequences, particularly for the rights of women and girls.

In response, high-ranking government officials from Biden have cited a case as to why the outcome may not be that bad: the Taliban may rule less harshly than feared after taking partial or power – to gain recognition and financial support from the powers that be.

This argument is among the main defensive measures against those who warn that the Taliban will take control of Kabul and impose a brutal, premodern version of Islamic law that reflects the strict rule that followed the American invasion after the 9/11 attacks September 2001 ended.

State Secretary Antony J. Blinken made the case on ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday, saying that the Taliban must come to power through an organized political process, not violence, “if they want to be recognized internationally if they don’t want to. ” be a pariah, ”he said.

On Wednesday, Mr Blinken announced that the administration would work with Congress to expedite a $ 300 million humanitarian aid pledge to Afghanistan that was pledged under the Trump administration last fall.

“When the United States begins to withdraw our troops, we will use our civil and economic aid to promote a just and lasting peace for Afghanistan and a better future for the Afghan people,” Blinken said in a statement.

In a background briefing for reporters following the announcement of Mr Biden’s withdrawal last week, a senior civil servant said denial of international legitimacy was a punishment for any effort to roll back human and women’s rights in the country.

Other US officials and some prominent experts call this “pariah” theory valid. The Taliban leaders are demonstrably seeking international credibility and attach great importance to lifting sanctions against them. Taliban officials have made clear their desire for foreign aid to rebuild their country after two decades of tough war.

Some experts also believe that the Taliban leaders have moderated in recent years, realizing that the cities of Afghanistan have modernized, noting that the group’s peace negotiators have traveled internationally and saw the outside world as theirs Founders rarely, if ever, have done so.

For critics, however, such notions are tragically deceived and ignore the fundamentalist ethos of the Taliban – and they are a thin cover to leave the country to a cruel fate.

“This is a story we tell ourselves we feel better about when we go,” said New Jersey Democrat Representative Tom Malinowski, who served as the State Department’s chief human rights officer in the Obama administration.

“We have nothing to offer that would lead them to preserve the things they have fought to erase,” added Malinowski, who spoke out against Mr Biden’s withdrawal plan.

Given that Mr Biden is withdrawing all American troops by September 11, diplomatic and financial pressure remains one of the few instruments the United States can use to contain the Taliban. For now, the United States will continue to provide military aid to the Afghan government in the hope that its security forces will not be overrun.

In the long term, however, there is almost no doubt that the Taliban will either become part of the Afghan government or take over the country entirely. How the United States will react is unclear.

“It will be difficult to define what is ‘acceptable’ for the Taliban’s future influence in Afghanistan,” said Jeffrey W. Eggers, who served as Senior Director for Afghanistan at the Obama White House and adviser to the country’s chief commander, General, was. Stanley A. McChrystal.

Mr Eggers said it was relatively easy to define and enforce expectations of the Taliban’s relations with terrorist groups such as al-Qaeda and the Islamic State. But social and human rights will be more difficult, he said.

The new Washington

Updated

April 22, 2021, 8:01 p.m. ET

Barnett Rubin, an expert on Afghanistan who served as senior adviser to President Barack Obama’s Special Envoy to the country from 2009 to 2013, is among those who hope the Taliban can be softened through non-military means.

In a paper released by the United States Institute of Peace last month prior to Mr. Biden’s announcement, Mr. Rubin claimed that America “has overestimated the role of military pressure or presence and underestimated the leverage that the pursuit of Taliban after offering sanctions for relief, recognition and international aid. “

Mr Rubin added that the deal the Taliban leaders signed with the Trump administration in February 2020 required Washington to begin the process of lifting US and UN sanctions against the group, including some that are directed against their individual leaders. There was also a guarantee that the United States would “seek economic reconstruction cooperation with the new Afghan Islamic government after settlement.”

General Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the former chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, believed the idea in February during a testimony to Congress after a report he led, the Afghanistan Study Group, released a report.

“Sometimes we think we have no control over the Taliban,” said General Dunford, saying that the group’s desire for sanctions relief, international legitimacy and foreign support could mitigate their violence.

Vanda Felbab-Brown, the director of the Non-State Armed Actors Initiative at the Brookings Institution, agreed that Taliban leaders place high value on relations with the international community, if only to secure development finance.

“There is a real understanding at management level, not just a wrong attitude, that they don’t want to bankrupt the country to the extent they did in the 1990s,” said Ms. Felbab-Brown, who spoke extensively with the Taliban Officials and commanders. “In the 1990s, bankruptcy wasn’t accidental – it was a focused policy aimed at addressing Afghanistan’s problems by destroying the institutions of the past few decades.”

However, it remains unclear how the Taliban can resolve the contradiction between their doctrinal positions on women’s rights and political pluralism with the standards by which every US government and congress will condition aid.

Among others, the recently confirmed head of the US agency for international development, Samantha Power, is one of the most prominent human rights activists in the government.

“America is not shoveling aid unconditionally,” said Malinowski. “Most American relief supplies are designed to help governments do exactly what the Taliban despise.”

Such decisions were available to the Taliban when they controlled much of Afghanistan in the 1990s. For several years in a row, the group sent delegations to United Nations Headquarters to gain recognition, without success.

However, the desire for recognition and support was insufficient to convince the group to comply with the United States’ request to hand over the leader of al-Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, an attitude that ultimately followed the 9/11 attacks Invaded Afghanistan.

“I think Afghans deserve more than just being told. Well, the Taliban better not do that,” said Christine Fair, a professor at Georgetown University’s Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service who has studied in Afghanistan for years. “They are really clear that they want to turn back women’s rights. And they don’t want to contest elections. They believe they should get a piece of government because they have deadly power. “

Ms. Fair added that the Biden government should focus more on the role of neighboring Pakistan, which has long had great influence over the Taliban.

HR McMaster, a retired three-star general who served as national security advisor during the Trump administration, said it was “deceptive” to believe that the Taliban had changed radically in 20 years and rejected the idea that the group seeks greater international acceptance.

It is wrong to believe “there is a bold line between the Taliban and Al-Qaeda,” he said Monday during a discussion for the Belfer Center at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard in which he said Mr Biden’s decision sharply criticized.

“You have said your first step is to restore the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan,” he said. If that happened, it would be “a humanitarian catastrophe of colossal proportions”.

Mr Eggers said the reality could be more nuanced and one that could confuse American policymakers.

“For example, what if Afghanistan is about as bad as the Saudis in terms of treating women?” he said. “That’s not good enough, but what do we do then?”

Mark Mazzetti and Eric Schmitt contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Business

2 Killed in Driverless Tesla Automotive Crash, Officers Say

Mitchell Weston, chief investigator at the Harris County Fire Marshal’s Office, said that while the batteries are “generally safe”, high-speed shock can cause “thermal runaway,” which is “uncontrolled contact” between various materials in the batteries Batteries caused.

Thermal runaway can lead to fires and “battery reignition” even after an initial fire is extinguished, the security agency warned in its report. Mitsubishi Electric warns that “thermal runaway can lead to catastrophic consequences, including fire, explosion, sudden system failure, costly damage to equipment and possible personal injury.”

The firefighter’s office investigated the fire in the crash, a spokeswoman said. Constable Herman said his department was working with federal agencies to investigate.

He said police officers contacted Tesla on Saturday to “advise on some matters” but refused to discuss the nature of the talks.

Tesla, which has disbanded its PR team, didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Elon Musk, Tesla’s managing director, had published a recently released safety report from the company on Saturday and wrote on Twitter that “Tesla is busy with autopilot and is now approaching a ten times lower chance of an accident than the average vehicle”.

Tesla, which describes autopilot as the “future of driving” on its website, says the feature enables its vehicles to “automatically steer, accelerate and brake in their lane”. However, it is warned that “current autopilot functions require active driver monitoring and do not make the vehicle autonomous”.

In 2016, a driver in Florida was killed in a Tesla Model S who was in autopilot mode and unable to brake for a tractor-trailer that turned left in front of him.

Categories
Health

Prime Biden Covid officers to debate vaccine rollout with Home after J&J pictures paused

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergies and Infectious Diseases (left), speaks to Dr. David Kessler, Chief Science Officer of the White House COVID-19 Response Team on the Federal Coronavirus Response on Capitol Hill March 18, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Susan Walsh | Getty Images

The House’s coronavirus subcommittee will hear from three leading health officials in the Biden government on Thursday about United States efforts to step up vaccinations as Covid cases, including those of dangerous variants, are on the rise.

The hearing, which will also focus on the continued need for people to wear masks and follow social distancing measures, is slated to begin at 10:30 a.m. ET. It is streamed live.

The event comes two days after dozens of states abruptly stopped administering Johnson & Johnson’s single-dose Covid vaccine in response to the Food and Drug Administration’s recommendation to suspend those recordings while investigating cases of women, who have developed a rare bleeding disorder.

Some fear the recommendation, issued in response to six reported blood clot cases from nearly 7 million J&J doses administered, could hamper the global campaign to vaccinate the world against the pandemic.

The selected subcommittee on the coronavirus crisis, led by James Clyburn, DS.C., is led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the country’s foremost infectious disease expert, and the director of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Dr. Rochelle Walensky. David Kessler, a senior Covid official in President Joe Biden’s Department of Health and Human Services, is also on the witness list.

Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, listens to the response from Covid-19, DC during a hearing with the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions on March 18, 2021 in Washington on Capitol Hill, DC .

Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images

While the US is vaccinating more people than ever before, Covid cases are increasing in more than half of its states. According to the Johns Hopkins University, an average of more than 71,000 cases per day were counted for the past week.

“It’s almost a race between vaccinating people and this surge that is apparently about to increase,” Fauci told CNN on Wednesday.

The emergence of variants of Covid – like B 1.1.7, which recently flooded Michigan and is now the most common strain in the US – has led health officials to urge Americans to continue to take precautionary measures despite accelerated vaccination efforts.

Experts say Johnson & Johnson’s recent vaccination problems could fuel skepticism about vaccines.

In their quest to have all eligible individuals in the U.S. vaccinated against Covid, officials have stressed that all of the options available – from Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson – are safe and effective. All three have been approved by the FDA for emergency use. Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require two separate doses given three to four weeks apart.

But the six cases of women who developed the rare blood clots urged the FDA to stop J & J’s shot “out of caution.”

All women developed the disease within about two weeks of being vaccinated, health officials told reporters Tuesday. One of the women died.

“I think it will affect the hesitation, period. Whether it should or not is a different matter,” said Dr. Jeffrey Kahn, director of the Berman Institute of Bioethics at Johns Hopkins University, told CNBC.

With Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine only containing one dose, experts say the hiatus could also reduce vaccine access for some communities.

“This vaccine was biased to be used in harsher environments, places where you couldn’t deliver two doses. You wanted to deliver one dose and stick to the vaccination schedule,” said Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who sits on the Pfizer board of directors at CNBC on Tuesday.

– The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Disclosure: Scott Gottlieb is a CNBC employee and a member of the boards of directors of Pfizer, genetic testing startup Tempus, health technology company Aetion Inc., and biotech company Illumina. He is also co-chair of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings and Royal Caribbean’s Healthy Sail Panel.

Categories
Health

States Wrestle With Vaccine Pause as Federal Officers Reassure Public

Dr. Anthony S. Fauci sagte am Donnerstag, er hoffe, dass die Nation bald wieder in der Lage sein werde, den Johnson & Johnson-Impfstoff zu verwenden, als eine „Pause“, die nun auf unbestimmte Zeit droht, die Impfbemühungen in Übersee und in einigen der am stärksten ausgegrenzten Länder anzukurbeln Gemeinden in den Vereinigten Staaten.

Dr. Fauci, Präsident Bidens oberster medizinischer Berater für die Pandemie, äußerte sich während einer Anhörung des House Select-Unterausschusses zur Coronavirus-Krise, in der er und andere hochrangige Gesundheitsbehörden des Bundes die Amerikaner anflehten, sich weiterhin impfen zu lassen, und versuchten, die Nation zu beruhigen dass alle drei staatlich zugelassenen Impfstoffe sicher sind.

“Hoffentlich werden wir bald eine Entscheidung treffen, ob wir mit diesem sehr wirksamen Impfstoff wieder auf Kurs kommen können oder nicht”, sagte Dr. Fauci dem Gremium. Angesichts der zunehmenden Fälle im Mittleren Westen, fügte er hinzu, befindet sich die Nation in einer „prekären Situation“, und es ist unbedingt erforderlich, „so viele Menschen so schnell und so schnell wie möglich zu impfen“.

Es wurde jedoch zunehmend klarer, dass eine Suspendierung, die ursprünglich zwei bis drei Tage dauern sollte, erheblich länger dauern würde, da die Beamten mit Berichten über mindestens sechs seltene Fälle von Blutgerinnung bei Frauen rangen, die mit dem Schuss von Johnson & Johnson immunisiert worden waren. Die Gesundheitsbehörden des Bundes versuchen zu entscheiden, ob sie den Ärzten empfehlen sollen, den Impfstoff wieder aufzunehmen, möglicherweise mit neuen Einschränkungen.

Der Impfstoff war kein wesentlicher Bestandteil der Impfkampagne der Biden-Regierung. Ungefähr 7,7 Millionen Amerikaner haben den Schuss von Johnson & Johnson erhalten, was weniger als 4 Prozent der mehr als 198 Millionen Dosen entspricht, die im ganzen Land verabreicht werden.

Obwohl diese Zahlen gering sind, sind viele der Menschen, gegen die der Impfstoff gerichtet ist, gefährdet: Obdachlose in Baltimore, Bewohner des District of Columbia, Arme und Nichtversicherte in Massachusetts, Landbewohner in einer Reihe von Bundesstaaten. Alle Populationen sind mit einer Einzeldosis leichter zu erreichen als das Zwei-Dosis-Regime der Impfstoffe Pfizer und Moderna.

Etwa 10 Millionen Dosen, die in die Staaten verschifft werden, stehen jetzt in den Regalen und warten auf eine Entscheidung. Und viele Menschen, die möglicherweise keinen Schuss suchen, aber mit mobilen Kliniken und einer konzertierten Kontaktaufnahme hätten erreicht werden können, könnten zumindest vorerst zurückgelassen werden.

„Alle unsere Impfstoffe, Anbieter im ganzen Bundesstaat und unser Team im Gesundheitsministerium von Minnesota arbeiten intensiv daran, die Dinge zu planen und zu verschieben. Es handelt sich offensichtlich um eine Reihe von Dominosteinen “, sagte Jan Malcolm, Minnesotas Gesundheitskommissar. “Wir bedauern sehr die Kliniken, die wegen der Pause bei J & J kurzfristig abgesagt werden mussten, und das wird auch in den kommenden Wochen ein Problem sein.”

Der Pressesprecher des Weißen Hauses, Jen Psaki, kalibrierte erneut das Versprechen von Präsident Biden, bis Ende Mai genügend Impfstoffe für alle amerikanischen Erwachsenen zu beschaffen. Jetzt betont das Weiße Haus, dass alle Erwachsenen, die einen Impfstoff wollen, einen bekommen werden.

“Das bedeutet, dass bis Ende Mai für etwa 80 Prozent der Bevölkerung, bis Ende Juli etwa 90 Prozent der Bevölkerung”, sagte Frau Psaki gegenüber Reportern.

In Lexington, Kentucky, wurde eine Johnson & Johnson-Klinik für Freitag abgesagt, sodass rund 400 Personen ohne Termin waren. Allen wurde eine Last-Minute-Option angeboten, um einen Moderna-Impfstoff zu erhalten, aber nur etwa 65 nahmen das Angebot an, sagte Kevin Hall, ein Sprecher des Gesundheitsministeriums von Lexington-Fayette County.

“Dies war ein großer Erfolg für unsere Planung”, sagte Hall, dessen Agentur den Johnson & Johnson-Impfstoff bereits für Insassen und Obdachlose verwendet hatte und geplant hatte, in den kommenden Wochen Nachbarschaftskliniken anzubieten. “Die Logistik für den Abzug einer Klinik für die erste und zweite Dosis wird sehr viel schwieriger.”

Dr. Letitia Dzirasa, die Gesundheitskommissarin in Baltimore, sagte, die Stadt habe bisher nur etwa 1.400 Dosen des Johnson & Johnson-Impfstoffs erhalten, aber viele seien auf obdachlose Bewohner ausgerichtet. Die Stadt muss möglicherweise ihre Pläne für Pop-up-Kliniken im Freien überdenken und sich bemühen, die Bewohner des Heimatlandes diesen Sommer mit dem Impfstoff mit einer Dosis zu erreichen, sagte sie.

“Wir dachten, J & J wäre der ideale Kandidat, um diese Arbeit zu unterstützen”, sagte sie.

In Washington, DC, verzögern Beamte ein Programm, um mit Johnson & Johnson-Schüssen heimatgebundene Bewohner zu erreichen. Die Stadt hat diese Woche Termine für etwa 1.200 Personen abgesagt, aber inzwischen sollten alle eine Einladung zu einem neuen Termin für einen der beiden anderen von der Bundesregierung zugelassenen Impfstoffe erhalten haben, die von Pfizer-BioNTech und Moderna entwickelt wurden.

Andere staatliche und lokale Gesundheitsbehörden sagten, sie würden mit diesen beiden Impfstoffen auskommen. In der Region Flint, Michigan, die einige der höchsten Fallraten des Landes in jüngster Zeit aufweist, gaben Beamte an, dass sie alle geplanten Kliniken auch ohne den Impfstoff von Johnson & Johnson abdecken konnten.

“Bisher war es reibungslos”, sagte Dr. Pamela Hackert, die medizinische Gesundheitsbeauftragte des Gesundheitsministeriums von Genesee County, in einer E-Mail.

Aktualisiert

15. April 2021, 16:49 Uhr ET

Am Des Moines Area Community College in Iowa konnten Administratoren diesen Monat drei Kliniken auf dem Campus einrichten, in denen die Studenten einen Impfstoff mit zwei Dosen erhalten können. Rob Denson, der College-Präsident, sagte, er sei erfreut und überrascht über seine Fähigkeit, diese zukünftigen Kliniken so schnell zu organisieren.

“Ich denke, wir werden in relativ kurzer Zeit mit Impfstoffen überflutet sein”, sagte er.

Eine längere Unterbrechung der Verfügbarkeit von Johnson & Johnson wird sich jedoch allmählich verschlechtern, insbesondere in ärmeren Staaten mit schwer erreichbaren Bevölkerungsgruppen. Eine Sprecherin von Dr. José Romero, dem Gesundheitsminister in Arkansas, sagte: „Die Pause sollte ausreichend lang sein, um Sicherheitsfragen zu beantworten, aber nicht länger als nötig verlängert werden.

“Seine Sorge ist, dass eine überlange Pause das Zögern erhöht und das Vertrauen verringert”, sagte die Sprecherin Danyelle McNeill. Dr. Romero leitet das Beratungsgremium zu den Zentren für die Kontrolle und Prävention von Krankheiten, die letztendlich empfehlen werden, wie mit dem Johnson & Johnson-Impfstoff verfahren werden soll.

Die Suspendierung in den Vereinigten Staaten kann tiefgreifendere Konsequenzen in Übersee haben, wo bisher nur ein Bruchteil der übrigen Welt geimpft wurde. Dr. Luciana Borio, eine ehemalige amtierende Chefwissenschaftlerin der Food and Drug Administration, die auch im Nationalen Sicherheitsrat des Weißen Hauses von Trump tätig war, sagte, der Impfstoff von Johnson & Johnson sei ein entscheidendes Instrument, um die Ausbreitung des Virus auf der ganzen Welt zu stoppen .

“Es ist ein Impfstoff, der schnell in sehr großem Maßstab hergestellt werden kann und viel einfachere Verteilungsverfahren hat”, sagte sie. “Die Welt braucht mehr Unternehmen wie J & J, die ihren Impfstoff liefern.”

Die Beamten zählten sowohl auf Johnson & Johnson als auch auf einen anderen leicht zu verteilenden Impfstoff von AstraZeneca, um Impfungen in schwer zugängliche Teile der Welt zu bringen. Jüngste Berichte über seltene Blutgerinnsel bei Empfängern des AstraZeneca-Impfstoffs haben jedoch eine Reihe von Nationen dazu veranlasst, seine Verwendung zu überdenken.

Einige Regionen beschlossen, zu Johnson & Johnson zu wechseln. Vor zwei Wochen hat die Afrikanische Union 400 Millionen Dosen erhalten, obwohl sich wohlhabendere Nationen gescheut haben. Die Europäische Union sagte, sie werde nicht mehr von Johnson & Johnson kaufen, und Australien kündigte an, keine Dosen zu kaufen.

In den Vereinigten Staaten schlugen Mitglieder des CDC-Beratungsgremiums am Mittwoch vor, dass es eine Woche bis 10 Tage dauern würde, bis sie über genügend Informationen verfügen, um die Risiken des Impfstoffs zu bewerten und eine Entscheidung über seine Zukunft in den Vereinigten Staaten zu treffen. Dr. Fauci und zwei weitere Beamte – Dr. Rochelle Walensky, der CDC-Direktor, und Dr. David Kessler, der die Impfbemühungen der Biden-Regierung leitet – forderten die Amerikaner auf, sich weiterhin impfen zu lassen.

“Ich hoffe, wir können alle zusammenkommen und diese Botschaft senden”, sagte Dr. Kessler, insbesondere angesichts der Verbreitung besorgniserregender Varianten, und fügte hinzu, dass die drei vom Bund zugelassenen Impfstoffe “ein ausgezeichnetes Sicherheitsprofil” haben.

Was Sie über die Johnson & Johnson Vaccine Pause in den USA wissen müssen

    • Am 13. April 2021 forderten die US-Gesundheitsbehörden eine sofortige Unterbrechung der Verwendung des Einzeldosis-Impfstoffs Covid-19 von Johnson & Johnson, nachdem sechs Empfänger in den USA innerhalb von ein bis drei Wochen nach der Impfung eine seltene Erkrankung mit Blutgerinnseln entwickelt hatten.
    • Alle 50 Bundesstaaten, Washington, DC und Puerto Rico, haben die Verwendung des Impfstoffs vorübergehend eingestellt oder von empfohlenen Anbietern unterbrochen. Das US-Militär, staatlich geführte Impfstellen und eine Vielzahl privater Unternehmen, darunter CVS, Walgreens, Rite Aid, Walmart und Publix, pausierten die Injektionen ebenfalls.
    • Derzeit werden weniger als eine von einer Million Johnson & Johnson-Impfungen untersucht. Wenn tatsächlich ein Risiko für Blutgerinnsel durch den Impfstoff besteht – das noch ermittelt werden muss -, ist dieses Risiko äußerst gering. Das Risiko, in den USA an Covid-19 zu erkranken, ist weitaus höher.
    • Die Pause könnte die Impfbemühungen des Landes in einer Zeit erschweren, in der viele Staaten in neuen Fällen mit einem Anstieg konfrontiert sind und versuchen, das Zögern des Impfstoffs anzugehen.
    • Johnson & Johnson hat auch beschlossen, die Einführung seines Impfstoffs in Europa zu verzögern, da Bedenken hinsichtlich seltener Blutgerinnsel bestehen, was dem Impfschub in Europa einen weiteren Schlag versetzt. Südafrika, das von einer dort auftretenden ansteckenden Virusvariante am Boden zerstört wurde, stellte die Verwendung des Impfstoffs ebenfalls ein. Australien kündigte an, keine Dosen zu kaufen.

Die Berichte über Blutgerinnsel waren der zweite Schlag gegen den Johnson & Johnson-Impfstoff. Anfang dieses Monats hat eine Verwechslung von Inhaltsstoffen in einer Produktionsstätte in Baltimore, die Emergent BioSolutions gehört, bis zu 15 Millionen Dosen des Impfstoffs ruiniert. Die FDA inspiziert nun die Anlage, um festzustellen, ob dort hergestellte Dosen der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich gemacht werden können.

Während einer mehr als zweistündigen Anhörung fragte jedoch nur ein Gesetzgeber – der Vertreter Mark E. Green, Republikaner von Tennessee, der Arzt ist – nach dem Impfstoff von Johnson & Johnson. Er forderte die Ärzte auf, vorsichtig zu sein, wenn sie über die Ermittlungen sprachen, und sagte, er befürchte, dass sie Ängste schüren würden, die die Menschen davon abhalten würden, sich impfen zu lassen.

Und es gibt frühe Beweise dafür, dass die Besorgnis gut aufgenommen wird. Eine am Donnerstag vom Boston Children’s Hospital veröffentlichte Umfrage unter Survey Monkey ergab, dass die Bereitschaft, den Schuss von Johnson & Johnson zu erhalten, bei Amerikanern, die sich impfen lassen wollten, innerhalb von zwei Tagen um 26 Prozentpunkte zurückging. Laut der Umfrage, einem Projekt der Outbreaks Near Me-Initiative des Krankenhauses, einem Crowdsourcing-System zur Überwachung von Infektionskrankheiten, betrug der Rückgang bei Frauen, die sich impfen lassen wollten, 31 Prozentpunkte.

“Jedes Mal, wenn auf Bundesebene Bedenken oder rote Fahnen gehisst werden, wird dies die breite Öffentlichkeit beunruhigen”, sagte Dr. Dzirasa.

Die Sitzung am Donnerstag hatte den Untertitel „Ein wissenschaftlich fundierter Ansatz zur schnellen und sicheren Beendigung der Pandemie“. Aber was auch immer über Wissenschaft diskutiert wurde, wurde von parteipolitischer Haltung und Streit überschattet.

Demokraten machten sich Sorgen um den Fox News-Moderator Tucker Carlson, der seine Show genutzt hat, um fälschlicherweise zu behaupten, dass die Impfstoffe nicht funktionieren.

Die Republikaner, die gerade erst an der Südgrenze des Landes waren, nutzten die Sitzung, um den Umgang der Biden-Regierung mit der Einwanderungskrise anzugreifen. Sie winkten mit Fotos von Migranten, die unter beengten Verhältnissen lebten, und beschwerten sich über Testregeln für diejenigen, die in das Land einreisen.

Der Vertreter Jim Jordan, Republikaner von Ohio, und Dr. Fauci wiederholten ihren hitzigen Zusammenstoß, als Dr. Fauci das letzte Mal vor dem Panel im Juli aussagte.

“Sie schimpfen wieder”, sagte Dr. Fauci an einer Stelle.

“Ich schimpfe nicht”, antwortete Herr Jordan.

“Ja, das sind Sie”, beharrte Dr. Fauci.

Die Repräsentantin Maxine Waters, Demokratin von Kalifornien, deren Schwester an Covid-19 gestorben ist, sagte zu Dr. Fauci: „Ich liebe dich“ und sagte zu Herrn Jordan: „Halt den Mund.“

Noah Weiland, Rebecca Robbins und Sharon LaFraniere trugen zur Berichterstattung bei.

Categories
World News

China sanctions U.S. spiritual freedom officers, Canadian member of parliament

A masked protester holds a US flag during a protest against China’s human rights violations against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang Province and calls on the US government to crack down on Beijing on April 6, 2019 in Washington, USA.

Yasin Ozturk | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

China has imposed sanctions on two US religious rights officials, a Canadian MP and a subcommittee on human rights, in Canada’s lower house, according to a statement released by the Chinese State Department on Saturday.

The sanctions are the latest escalation in a growing dispute between Western nations and Beijing over the treatment of ethnic and religious minorities in China, particularly in Xinjiang Province.

The Chinese sanctions target the chairman and vice chairman of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom, Gayle Manchin and Tony Perkins. USCIRF has condemned China’s treatment of the Uyghur Muslim population in Xinjiang and approved recent US sanctions against Chinese officials.

Beijing also targeted Canadian MP Michael Chong, who is vice chairman of the House of Common’s Foreign Affairs Committee. The Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on International Human Rights was also sanctioned.

The House of Common Foreign Affairs Committee released a report earlier this month based on meetings of the subcommittee that concluded that human rights violations against Uighur Muslims in China constitute crimes against humanity and genocide.

Chinese sanctions prohibit officials from entering mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macau, and prohibit Chinese citizens and institutions from doing business with the officials and interacting with the Human Rights Subcommittee.

The sanctions are in response to penalties imposed by the US on two Chinese officials earlier this week. The government of Biden said it imposed these sanctions in response to human rights violations against Uighur Muslims.

The US sanctions were directed against China’s Wang Junzheng, secretary of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps Party Committee, and Chen Mingguo, director of the Xinjiang Public Security Bureau.

The two officials were targeted for their links to “arbitrary detention and aggravated physical abuse, among other serious human rights violations against Uyghurs,” the Treasury Department said in a statement Monday.

Canada also imposed sanctions on Chinese officials for treating Uyghurs.

Categories
Business

U.S. Well being Officers Query AstraZeneca Vaccine Trial Outcomes

This US trial, which was attended by more than 32,000 participants, was the largest test of its kind for the shot. The results, AstraZeneca released on Monday, came from an interim look at the data after 141 Covid-19 cases occurred in volunteers.

The company had only announced on Tuesday how up-to-date this data was. This information is important because sometimes a more up-to-date look at clinical trial results may reveal different efficacy and safety.

If the analysis was done on data from a month or two ago, it is possible that a more recent look may give a different picture of the vaccine’s effectiveness and safety. The company has announced that it will provide the FDA with a more comprehensive and up-to-date dataset than it released on Monday. Although no clinical study is large enough to rule out extremely rare side effects, AstraZeneca reported that its study did not identify any serious safety issues.

The new data may have arrived too late to make a big difference in the United States, where the vaccine has not yet been approved and is not expected to be available until May. By then, federal officials say, there will be enough vaccine doses for all adults in the country from the three already approved vaccines: Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson.

Even so, the better-than-expected results have been seen as an encouraging turn for AstraZeneca’s shot, whose low cost and simple storage requirements have made it an important part of the quest to vaccinate the world.

The results were also believed to allay concerns about the AstraZeneca vaccine in Europe. Regulators there said the shot was “safe and effective” last week after conducting a review after a small number of people who had recently been vaccinated developed blood clots and abnormal bleeding. The US study found no evidence of such problems, although some real-world safety issues can only be identified when a drug or vaccine is widely used.

Millions of people have received the AstraZeneca shot worldwide, including more than 17 million in the UK and the European Union, almost all without serious side effects. To increase public confidence, many European political leaders have received the injections in the past few days. The AstraZeneca vaccine was also given to executives in South Korea, Taiwan and Thailand last week.