Categories
Politics

Doug Mastriano’s Extraordinarily On-line Rise to Republicans’ Governor Nominee in Pa.

BLOOMSBURG, Pa. — In the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic, Diane Fisher, a nurse from Weatherly, Pa., was surfing through videos on Facebook when she came across a livestream from Doug Mastriano, a Pennsylvania state senator.

Starting in late March 2020, Mr. Mastriano had beamed regularly into Facebook from his living room, offering his increasingly strident denunciations of the state’s quarantine policies and answering questions from his viewers, sometimes as often as six nights a week and for as long as an hour at a stretch.

“People were upset, and they were fearful about things,” Ms. Fisher said. “And he would tell us what was going on.”

Ms. Fisher told her family and her friends about what Mr. Mastriano billed as “fireside chats,” after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s radio broadcasts during the Depression and World War II. “The next thing you knew,” she recalled, “there was 5,000 people watching.”

Mr. Mastriano’s rise from obscure and inexperienced far-right politician to Republican standard-bearer in Pennsylvania’s governor’s race was swift, stunning and powered by social media. Although he is perhaps better known for challenging the results of the 2020 presidential election and calling the separation of church and state a “myth,” Mr. Mastriano built his foundation of support on his innovative use of Facebook in the crucible of the early pandemic, connecting directly with anxious and isolated Americans who became an uncommonly loyal base for his primary campaign.

He is now the GOP nominee in perhaps the most closely watched race for governor in the country, in part because it would place a 2020 election denier in control of a major battleground state’s election system. Both President Biden and former President Donald J. Trump are making campaign appearances in Pennsylvania this week. As the race enters its last months, one of the central questions is whether the online mobilization that Mr. Mastriano successfully wielded against his own party establishment will prove similarly effective against Josh Shapiro, his Democratic rival — or whether a political movement nurtured in the hothouse of right-wing social media discontent will be unable or unwilling to transcend it.

Mr. Mastriano has continued to run a convention-defying campaign. He employs political neophytes in key positions and has refused for months to interact with mainstream national and local reporters beyond expelling them from events. (His campaign did not respond to requests for comment for this article.)

He grants interviews almost exclusively to friendly radio and TV shows and podcasts that share Mr. Mastriano’s far-right politics, and continues to heavily rely on Facebook to reach voters directly.

“It is the best-executed and most radical ‘ghost the media’ strategy in this cycle,” said Michael Caputo, a former Trump campaign adviser, who said other Republican strategists were watching Mr. Mastriano’s example closely.

“It’s never been done before. He’s on a spacewalk,” he said. “And the question we’re all asking is, does he make it back to the capsule?”

Although Mr. Mastriano no longer hosts fireside chats, his campaign posts several times more often a day on Facebook than most candidates, according to Kyle Tharp, the author of the FWIW newsletter, which tracks digital politics. His campaign’s Facebook post engagements have been comparable to those of Mr. Shapiro, despite Mr. Shapiro’s spending far more on digital advertising.

“He is a Facebook power user,” Mr Tharp said.

But Mr. Mastriano’s campaign has done little to expand his reach outside his loyal base, even as polls since the primary have consistently shown him trailing Mr. Shapiro, Pennsylvania’s attorney general, albeit often narrowly. And Mr. Mastriano’s efforts to add to his audience on the right through advertising on Gab, a platform favored by white nationalists, prompted a rare retreat in the face of criticism last month.

A career Army officer until his retirement in 2017 and a hard-line social conservative, Mr. Mastriano won a special election for the State Senate in 2019 after campaigning on his opposition to what he described as the “barbaric holocaust” of legal abortion and his see that the United States is an inherently Christian nation whose Constitution is incompatible with other faiths. But he was known to few outside his district until he began his pandemic broadcasts in late March 2020.

In the live videos, Mr. Mastriano was unguarded and at times emotional, giving friendly shout-outs to familiar names in the chat window. His fireside chats arrived at a fertile moment on the platform, when conservative and right-wing activists were using Facebook to assemble new organizations and campaigns to convert discontent into action — first with the Covid lockdowns and, later, the 2020 election outcome.

Mr. Mastriano linked himself closely to these currents of activism in his home state, speaking at the groups’ demonstrations and events. A video he livestreamed from the first significant anti-lockdown rally on the steps of the State Capitol in Harrisburg in April 2020, armed with a selfie stick, eventually racked up more than 850,000 views.

After the presidential election was called for Mr. Biden on Nov. 7, 2020, Mr. Mastriano was greeted as a star at the first “Stop the Steal” rally at the capitol in Harrisburg that afternoon. He became one of the most prominent faces of the movement to overturn the election in Pennsylvania, working with Mr. Trump’s lawyers to publicize widely debunked claims regarding election malfeasance and to send a slate of “alternate” electors to Washington, on the spurious legal theory that they could be used to overturn the outcome. (He would later be present at the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, though there is no evidence that he entered the building.)

When Republican colleagues in the State Senate criticized those schemes and Mr. Mastriano by name, he pointed to the size of his online army.

“I have more followers on Facebook alone than all 49 other senators combined,” Mr. Mastriano told Steve Turley, a local right-wing podcast host, in an interview. “That any colleague or fellow Republican would think that it would be a good idea to throw me under the bus with that kind of reach — I mean, they’re just not very smart people.”

Mr. Mastriano was eventually removed from the chairmanship of a State Senate committee overseeing an investigation he had championed into the state’s election results, and he was later expelled from the Senate’s Republican caucus — episodes that burnished his credentials with supporters suspicious of the state’s GOP establishment . His campaign for governor, which he formally announced this January, has drawn on not only the base he has cultivated since 2020 but also on the right-wing grass-roots groups with whom he has made common cause on Covid and the 2020 election.

“That whole movement is rock-solid behind him,” said Sam Faddis, the leader of UnitePA, a self-described Patriot group based in Susquehanna County, Pa.

When UnitePA hosted a rally on Aug. 27 in a horse arena in Bloomsburg, bringing together a coalition of groups in the state dedicated to overhauling the election system they insist was used to steal the election from Mr. Trump, many of the activists who spoke offered praise for Mr. Mastriano and his candidacy. From the stage, Tabitha Valleau, the leader of the organization FreePA, gave detailed instructions for how to volunteer for Mr. Mastriano’s campaign.

The crowd of about 500, most of whom stayed for all of the nearly six-hour rally, was full of Mastriano supporters, including Ms. Fisher. “He helped us through a bad time,” she said. “He stuck with his people.”

Charlie Gerow, a veteran Pennsylvania Republican operative and candidate for governor who lost to Mr. Mastriano in May, said this loyally following what Mr. Mastriano’s greatest strength. “He’s leveraged that audience on every mission he’s undertaken,” he said.

But with recent polls showing Mr. Mastriano lagging between 3 and 10 points behind Mr. Shapiro, Mr. Gerow is among the strategists doubting his primary strategy will translate to a general electorate.

“I think it’s going to be important for him to run a more traditional campaign, dealing with the regular media even when it’s unpalatable and unfriendly,” Mr. Gerow said.

Mr. Mastriano has also drawn criticism for his efforts to expand his social-media reach beyond Facebook and Twitter into newer, fringier spaces on the right.

In July, the liberal watchdog group Media Matters noted that Mr. Mastriano, according to his campaign filings, had paid $5,000 to the far-right social media platform Gab, which gained notoriety in 2018 after the suspect charged in the shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh, in which 11 people were killed, used the platform to detail his racist and anti-Semitic views and plans for the shooting. Gab’s chief executive, Andrew Torba, who lives in Pennsylvania, has made anti-Semitic statements himself and appeared at a white nationalist conference this spring.

Mr. Torba and Mr. Mastriano had praised each other in a podcast interview in May, after which Mr. Mastriano had spoken hopefully of Gab’s audience. “Apparently about a million of them are in Pennsylvania,” he said on his own livestream, “so we’ll have some good reach.”

Mr. Torba, who did not respond to emailed requests for comment, has continued to champion Mr. Mastriano, describing the Pennsylvania governor’s race as “the most important election of the 2022 midterms, because Doug is an outspoken Christian,” in a video he posted in late July. He added, “We’re going to take this country back for the glory of God.”

But after initially standing his ground, Mr. Mastriano finally bowed to sustained criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike and closed his personal account with Gab early this month, issuing a brief statement denouncing anti-Semitism.

This month Mr. Shapiro, who is Jewish, spent $1 million on TV ads highlighting Mastriano’s connections to Gab. “We cannot allow this to become normalized — Doug Mastriano is dangerous and extreme, and we must defeat him in November,” said Will Simons, a spokesman for the Shapiro campaign.

The push reflected a view that one of Mr. Mastriano’s core vulnerabilities lay in his vast online footprint, with its hours of freewheeling conversation in spaces frequented by far-right voices.

Still, some Democrats who watched Mr. Mastriano’s rapid rise at close range have cautioned against counting him out. “Mastriano’s been underestimated by his own party,” said Brit Crampsie, a political consultant who was until recently the State Senate Democrats’ spokeswoman. “I fear him being underestimated by the Democrats. I wouldn’t rule him out.”

Categories
Politics

After Backing Army Pressure in Previous, U.S.A.I.D. Nominee Focuses on Deploying Gentle Energy

WASHINGTON – Samantha Power becomes more emotional towards the end of the 2014 documentary, Watchers of the Sky, which traces the origins of the legal definition of genocide. At the time, Ms. Power was President Barack Obama’s Ambassador to the United Nations and, she said, had “great insight into much of the pains” in the world.

To prevent mass atrocities abroad, one had to “consider what we can do about it in order to exhaust the tools at your disposal,” Ms. Power said in the film. “And I always think of the privilege of being able to try – just to try.”

Little doubt about Ms. Power’s zeal – given her career as a war correspondent, human rights activist, academic expert, and foreign affairs advisor – even if it meant advocating military violence to stop widespread murders.

Now, as President Biden’s candidate to lead the US Agency for International Development, she is preparing to re-enter government as administrator of soft power and oppose the use of weapons as a deterrent and punishment against the urged her in the past.

A Senate committee is expected to vote on her nomination as head of one of the world’s largest distributors of humanitarian aid on Thursday.

If confirmed, Mr Biden will also put her on the National Security Council, where during the Obama administration she pushed for military inventions to protect civilians from government-sponsored attacks in Libya in 2011 and Syria in 2013 which declined 2003 invasion of Iraq.)

The fact that she will sit at the table again on the council – and will almost certainly again debate whether American forces should be drawn into ongoing conflict – has worried some officials, analysts and think-tank experts, the military reluctance of the Biden administration demand. Mr Biden seems to be leaning like this: He has embraced economic sanctions as an instrument of hard power and is expected to announce a full withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan by September 11 to end the longest war in the United States.

“When you are talking about humanity, famine and war, natural causes aside, war is the leading cause of famine around the world,” Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul told Ms. Power last month at her Senate confirmation hearing. “Are you ready to admit that the Libyan and Syrian interventions you advocated were a mistake?”

Mrs. Power didn’t. “When these situations arise, it’s almost about less evils – that the decisions are very challenging,” she said.

The US aid agency naturally has a long-term view of the world compared to the immediacy of military action. In addition to the humanitarian aid amounting to around 6 billion US dollars, which it is making available this year for disaster-stricken countries, the agency is trying to prevent conflict at its roots, largely strengthen the economy, counteract state corruption and democracy and promote human rights.

This mission is central to Mr Biden’s foreign policy and may nowhere prove more important than in his global competition with China.

Last month, Foreign Minister Antony J. Blinken reassured allies that they would not return to a “us-or-you” decision with China as the two superpowers vie for economic, diplomatic and military advantage.

Representative Tom Malinowski, Democrat of New Jersey and former Deputy Secretary of State for Democracy and Human Rights of Obama, described in his loan and development projects the “perception that China exports corruption”.

For example, a February study by the International Republican Institute, a private not-for-profit group that receives government funding and promotes democracy, concluded that Panama’s decision in 2017 to sever diplomatic relations with Taiwan “appeared to be due to disbursements” from China was driven. It was also noted that Nepal regularly revoked the legal status of Tibetan refugees after becoming economically dependent on Beijing.

The American aid organization alone cannot keep up with the resources that China has deployed in developing countries. But Mr. Malinowski said his support for journalists, legal advisors and legitimate opposition groups could “expose and combat” caustic foreign leaders who had benefited from Beijing’s financial aid and playbook to stay in power.

“There is a problem that has come to the fore in this government and that it is very focused on, which is fighting corruption,” Malinowski said of Ms. Power. “And USAID may play a very important role there.”

At her confirmation hearing in March, Ms. Power told the senators that she had been moved to pursue a career in foreign affairs following the 1989 massacre of Tiananmen protesters in Beijing. She described China’s “coercive and predatory approach that is so transactional” in dealing with developing countries that ultimately become dependent on Beijing through what she called “debt-trap diplomacy”.

“I think it’s not going so well, and that opens up the United States,” Ms. Power told Indiana Republican Senator Todd Young.

The mostly harmless nudge of Democrats and Republicans during the hearing showed how fighting China has become a rare, if reliable, non-partisan issue in Congress. “I think it is absolutely essential that our development funds are used to advance our geostrategic priorities,” said Young.

The aid agency and the State Department have budgeted around $ 2 billion for programs to promote democracy, human rights and open governance abroad in fiscal 2021 – a third as much as funding humanitarian aid.

It’s an area that Ms. Power is expected to expand into. The Biden government’s first budget released on Friday alleged it was committing an unspecified but “substantial increase in resources” to advance human rights and democracy while thwarting corruption and authoritarianism.

The spending plan will also support another of Ms. Power’s priorities: fighting corruption, violence and poverty in Central America to curb the influx of thousands of migrants who travel to the southwestern border each year. The Biden government is betting on a $ 4 billion strategy through 2025 – including an initial tranche of $ 861 million proposed this year – to help stabilize the region.

In El Salvador, for example, killings fell 61 percent after a USAID attempt to reduce violence from 2015 to 2017, Ms. Power told senators, and the agency’s programs in Honduras have produced similar results. In addition to assisting local prosecutors, the programs brought together government officials, businesses, and church and community leaders to distract young people from gangs through professional training, tutoring, and artistic activities.

She met with some skepticism.

Ohio Republican Senator Rob Portman noted that the number of Central American children on the border has increased steadily since January, despite the fact that the United States has spent $ 3.6 billion on similar efforts over the past five years.

“The results are not impressive,” said Portman. “It’s primarily an economic problem” and “people will still try to get to the US.”

Explaining foreign policy decisions to the American people and making them relevant to their lives is a driving theme for the State Department under Mr. Biden. Ms. Power can draw on her own experience as an immigrant from Ireland and as a storyteller to help alleviate the border crisis by attacking its root causes.

“That’s part of the job – you have to be a salesperson, you have to go out and tell people, ‘So we need more resources to do this job, and this is where USAID can be an incredibly important partner,” said John Prendergast, a longtime veteran Human rights and anti-corruption activist and close friend of Ms. Power.

“There is so much that can be done between bombing and nothing,” said Prendergast, paraphrasing Luis Moreno Ocampo, the former prosecutor of the International Criminal Court featured in the same genocide documentary as Ms. Power. “And all of Samantha’s work and life was between those two extremes.”

Gayle Smith, who ran the aid agency for Mr Obama and is now the State Department’s coronavirus vaccine envoy, put it more clearly.

“It’s not that USAID is going to break into anyone,” she said.

Categories
Entertainment

Yuh-Jung Youn By no means Dreamed of Performing. Now She’s an Oscar Nominee for ‘Minari.’

For her 60th birthday, Korean veteran Yuh-Jung Youn made a promise to herself. She would only work with those she trusts. Even if her ventures fell short, she would not be particularly concerned about the outcome, as long as she personally valued the people who made them.

This late life philosophy, born of decades of limited choice and professional trauma, brought her to Minari, director Lee Isaac Chung’s semi-autobiographical story about a Korean family with roots in Arkansas. Youn’s bittersweet performance as grandmother Soonja in the affectionate immigration drama earned her an Oscar nomination for best supporting actress, the first for a Korean actress.

“I, a 73-year-old Asian, could never have dreamed of being nominated for an Oscar,” said Youn on a video call from her home in Seoul. “‘Minari’ brought me a lot of presents.”

As she recounted this triumph and the many pitfalls that preceded it, her thoughtful expression often broke out into an affable smile, even happy laughter. Clad in a low-key black top and long necklace, her calm presence was effortlessly graceful. She got away with no rush or greeting, but was determined to make her ideas understandable. Occasionally she would ask a friend off camera for help with certain English words to pinpoint each point.

She was surprised that her co-star Steven Yeun was the first Asian-American artist to receive a nomination for best actor: “All I can say is, it’s time! The success of ‘Parasite’ has definitely helped Korean artists gain more recognition, she added.

This film, directed by Bong Joon Ho, was the first to win non-English best picture, and it has turned into Youn’s Oscar run in other ways.

She’d gotten back from filming a new project in Vancouver, British Columbia, an Apple TV drama called Pachinko, just in time to hear the announcement of her nomination. At first she felt numb. Then the Korean news media reported on their chances. “It is very stressful. They think I’m a soccer player or an Olympian, “she said, adding,” This pressure is really tough on me. “Because of Bong’s film,” they have hope that I can win. I keep telling him, “It’s all because of you!”

Bong, a fan of Kim Ki-Young’s “Woman of Fire,” the 1971 film in which Youn made her feature film debut, envied her awards season experience during the pandemic. “He said to me, ‘You’re lucky you can just sit down and make Zoom calls. America has a prize race and you have to go here and there and everywhere. ‘I thought races were only for horses,’ she said.

She makes a strong push to the goal. Youn is nominated for her performance and as part of the “Minari” ensemble at the SAG Awards on Sunday. She is also ready for an Independent Spirit Award later this month. And it has already received awards from more than 20 groups of critics.

It’s the final turn in a career spanning more than 50 years in Korean television and film – including a recent cooking reality show titled “Youn’s Kitchen” and a new non-fiction series in a guest house, “Youn’s Stay” – but the self – I never imagined a life in the performing arts. Her international breakthrough, like everything else along the way, seems to her by chance.

“It’s embarrassing,” she said. “Most people fell in love with the films or the theater. But in my case it was just an accident. “

When she was a teenager in the early 1960s, she attended an MC for a children’s game show on a television station and invited them to give presents to the audience: “After that, I got the check and it was good money.” Similar jobs followed until a director suggested she audition for a drama. Although she hesitated, she was driven by need: she had failed her college entrance exam and deeply embarrassed her mother.

“To tell the truth, I didn’t know what acting was,” she said. “I tried to memorize the line and do whatever they asked me to do. At the time, I didn’t know if I was enjoying it or if I didn’t like it. “

As it was on the rise in the mid-1970s, Youn married and moved to Florida, where her husband attended university. She spent nearly a decade as a housewife, raising her two American-born children. Then she divorced and returned to Korea as a single mother. Her fame was gone and the ingrained sexism in Korean society made her career resumption a cruel affair. “The audience called and said, ‘She’s divorced. She shouldn’t be on TV, “she recalled, adding,” Now they like me a lot. It’s very strange, but it’s human. ”

In order to send her two sons to college, she accepted parts almost indiscriminately. But when she was 60 and was no longer obliged to support her family financially, she could only invest in people she believed in, like the writer Hong Sang-soo, who occasionally frustrates her for the many recordings he requested , and Im Sang-soo, who cast her in roles unknown to a Korean actress of her age. In “The Taste of Money” (2013), for example, Youn embodies a powerful woman who sexually harasses her younger male secretary.

Youn’s close friend, producer In-Ah Lee, introduced her to Chung, the director of Minari, at a film festival in Busan. Chung adored her like Bong in “Woman of Fire” and impressed her with his knowledge or her early work. She wanted to know more about him. “Everyone is teasing me about it now,” she said. “I fell in love with Isaac because he is a very calm man. I wish he were my son too. “

In each film, Chung said via email, “She does something that is surprising or unexpected. I felt that her own life and approach to life was very close to the part I had written. He added that the actress is known in South Korea for her big heart and matter-of-fact manner, and he knew she would bring those qualities to the role of Minari “in an audience-inviting way.”

Critic Kristen Yoonsoo Kim wrote for The Nation and said that Youn “steals the limelight; Even if she leans towards caricature, her Soonja brings the much-needed humor and vitality to a drama that could otherwise easily go to its knees. “(Kim’s reviews also appear in the New York Times.)

When Youn read the script, the dangers of the Korean-American experience and how it doesn’t exactly fit into a single identity carried along with her. “Maybe I made this film for my two sons because I knew how they felt,” she said.

Chung convinced her when she asked if he wanted her to imitate his grandmother, and he replied that this was not his goal. She valued the freedom to create a character that goes beyond what’s on the page. Still, it was Chung’s sensitive approach that she valued.

She remembered the chaotic first day of filming Minari in the heat of Tulsa, Okla. Chung could see she was suffering, Youn recalled. “I could feel his respect and I was worried.”

In contrast, she admitted, she thought that the many scenes she shared with the inexperienced young actor Alan S. Kim, who plays her grandson, would test her patience. I thought, ‘It’s going to be miserable. What should I do with this one? ‘”But when she noticed that the boy had memorized his lines, her concern disappeared. She shares his work ethic.

Intensive preparation had always served Youn as a shield against self-confidence about her background. “I didn’t go to drama school or study film, so I had an inferiority complex. I was practicing so hard when I got a script, ”she explained.

But she is skeptical about further prospects in Hollywood. Youn, who often apologized during the interview for how bluntly she believed she was sounding in a language that wasn’t her own, fears that her lack of English could be an obstacle. But if she has time to learn her dialogue, she’s ready to try.

“Come to think about it, it was all worth it,” said Youn. “At the time, I only had minor roles and most people hated me. I’ve been thinking about just quitting or going back to the States. “But she is a survivor, she added. “I’m still alive and finally enjoying acting.”

Categories
Entertainment

Steven Yeun Turns into First Asian-American Finest Actor Nominee

Steven Yeun is finally getting the recognition he deserves thanks to his role as Jacob Yi Threatening. In addition to receiving his first Oscar nomination on March 15, Yeun also became the first Asian-American nominee for best actor in Oscars history. Along with Riz Ahmed’s nomination in the same category, this year’s ceremony marked the first time two men of East or South Asian descent were recognized in the same year. Miyoshi Umeki and Haing S. Ngor are currently the only Asian-American actors to win Oscars in the supporting actor and actor categories.

In the history of the Oscars, only five men of East or South Asian descent have been nominated for best actor. Of the five – including Yeun, Ahmed, Yul Brynner, Topol, and Sir Ben Kingsley – only Brynner and Kinglsey took home the Brynner award for 1956 The king and me and Kingsley for 1982 Gandhi. Despite Brynner’s Buryat ancestry, his casting as King of Siam was viewed as problematic. It’s been 18 years since Kinglsey was nominated for his role as Colonel Massoud Amir Behrani in House made of sand and fogSo Yeun’s nomination was a long time coming.

“It’s probably a bummer that it does. This is a tough question for me,” Yeun said earlier diversity write about potential story with a nomination. “As great as it would be to set a precedent or be part of a moment that breaks a ceiling, I personally don’t want to be caught up in that moment either. The truth that I try to understand for myself is who I am , individually. ”

He continued, “I’m happy to be serving a bigger moment for the fellowship. And I’m happy to be driving narrative and showing who we are because I am, too. I’m an Asian American and the pride that I am But for me it is really about carrying my space and myself through this life and making sure that I say it from my point of view, but it would be great and I hope that we can do a lot more of it and it won’t be a problem for the future. “

Categories
Politics

Biden allies foyer White Home to search out alternative for finances nominee Tanden

Neera Tanden, President Joe Biden’s nominee for Director of the Office of Administration and Budget (OMB), attends a hearing with the Senate Committee on Budget on Capitol Hill in Washington on February 10, 2021.

Anna Moneymaker | Pool | Reuters

President Joe Biden’s administration is being asked to search for possible replacement candidates for Neera Tanden, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter as the decision to head the bureau of administration and budget is on the verge of not passing the Senate.

Numerous Biden allies, including those in the business community, are working for the White House, these people added.

Two names cited as potential replacements are Gene Sperling, who has ties to former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, and Ann O’Leary, who has ties to Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Biden’s allies are encouraging his advisors to prepare for the possibility the Senate will not approve Tanden, according to the people.

Many of these allies are also warning the White House of another possible scenario: if Tanden doesn’t have the votes to get through the Senate, she could simply withdraw from the nomination herself.

Those who described the lobbying did so on condition of anonymity, as these consultations were private.

Sperling was director of the National Economic Council under Clinton and Obama. O’Leary was the 2016 campaign advisor to Hillary Clinton, who later became Chief of Staff to California Governor Gavin Newsom.

O’Leary has publicly praised Tanden. The White House continued to stand by Tanden, including at the press conference on Monday.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said at the briefing that the government had urged lawmakers on both sides of the aisle to support Tanden’s nomination.

“We spoke on the phone with Democrats and Republicans and their offices over the weekend,” said Psaki.

White House and Center for American Progress officials, the Tanden think tank, did not respond to CNBC’s requests for comment.

Democrats currently control the Senate by a slim majority, but three lawmakers have come forward to say they will vote no to Tanden’s confirmation. One of those who have said they will not support Tanden is Senator Joe Manchin, DW.Va. Sens. Mitt Romney, R-Utah and Susan Collins, R-Maine also have no plans to vote for them.

Each of the three senators cited Tanden’s report on the demolition of federal officials on both sides of the aisle, including Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., The chairman of the Senate Budget Committee, who is currently reviewing her nomination.

During her confirmation hearing, Sanders targeted Tanden’s story of “vicious attacks” against progressives and Sanders himself. In a CNN interview on Friday, Sanders did not say whether he would vote for Tanden, but rather that he would speak to her “early next week” .