Categories
World News

Critics Pounce on Naomi Osaka After Loss, Denting Japan’s Declare to Variety

TOKYO – Just four days after Naomi Osaka climbed the stairs to ignite the Olympic cauldron unveiled as a symbol of a new, more inclusive Japan, that image was undermined on Tuesday by a backlash following her surprise defeat in Tokyo.

Many Japanese were stunned by Ms. Osaka’s third-round loss to Czech Republic’s Marketa Vondrousova after winning the gold medal in women’s tennis on home soil.

But when the face of the Summer Games was riddled with scandals and anxiety over an unshakable pandemic – Tokyo reported a record number of new coronavirus cases on Tuesday – Ms. Osaka was beaten on Japanese social media, with some questioning her identity or right of representation represented the country at all.

“I still can’t understand why she was the last torchbearer,” one commenter wrote on a Yahoo News story of her loss. “Even though she says she is Japanese, she doesn’t speak much Japanese.” Several comments like this one that harshly criticized Ms. Osaka were given “thumbs up” by 10,000 or more other Yahoo users.

As the Japanese-born daughter of a Haitian American father and Japanese mother, Ms. Osaka helped challenge Japan’s longstanding sense of racial and cultural identity.

It’s hugely popular in Japan and some online commentators came out in favor of it on Tuesday. The news media covered her victories extensively, and her face appeared in advertisements for Japanese products ranging from Citizen watches to Shiseido makeup to Nissin cup noodles.

Her election as the final torchbearer at the opening ceremony on Friday showed how eager the Olympic organizers were to promote Japan as a diverse culture. Washington Wizards star Rui Hachimura, who is of Japanese and Benin descent, also played a major role as the standard bearer for the Japanese Olympic team. But in some corners of society, people remain xenophobic and refuse to accept those who do not adhere to a very narrow definition of Japanese.

“I was a little concerned that it might be a little too early and that there might be some kind of kickback,” said Baye McNeil, a black man who has lived in Japan for 17 years and who writes a column for the Japan Times , an English language newspaper.

Those who felt uncomfortable might have thought, “If we had to swallow this Black Lives Matters thing and the portrayal of the country, you could do the least thing to win the gold medal,” said Mr. McNeil of Ms. Osaka. “When she didn’t, some people are now unleashing her ugliness.”

Mixed race residents, or “Hafu” as they are called in Japan, still struggle to be accepted as authentic Japanese, even if they were born and raised in the country.

Melanie Brock, a white Australian who runs a consultancy for overseas companies looking to do business in Japan and who has raised two sons whose father is Japanese, said that even though they attended the Japanese school system, they were often viewed as different . Other mothers often attributed their problematic behavior to the fact that the boys were multiracial.

“I think Japan is very tough for Hafus,” said Ms. Brock.

When she saw Ms. Osaka light the kettle at the opening ceremony, “I thought it was a brave decision” from Tokyo organizers, she said. “But I was mad at myself because I thought it was brave. It’s not brave at all. That’s right. She is a remarkable athlete. She is a great Presenter and she deserves to be advertised as such. “

Ms. Osaka may also have touched some nerves when she pulled out of the French Open in May after an argument with tennis officials over her decision not to appear at a press conference. She then revealed on Instagram that she was struggling with depression and anxiety.

Updated

July 27, 2021, 7:42 p.m. ET

Much of the online comments in Japan after her loss on Tuesday were derogatory about her mental health.

“She conveniently became ‘depressed’, was comfortably cured, and was honored to be the last torchbearer,” wrote a commenter on Twitter. “And then she just loses an important game. I can only say that she takes the sport lightly. “

Mental health is still a taboo subject in Japan. Naoko Imoto, UNICEF education specialist, Tokyo Organizing Committee’s gender equality advisor and former Olympian who swam for Japan, said in a press conference Monday that mental health is not yet well understood in Japan.

“In Japan we still don’t talk about mental health,” said Ms. Imoto. “When Naomi Osaka came up on the subject, there were a lot of negative comments about her and that was exaggerated because of the gender issue as she is a woman.”

“I think a lot of athletes are coming out now, and it’s actually common, and almost every athlete experiences it,” Ms. Imoto said.

Some of the comments on Ms. Osaka seemed to reflect the conservative criticism of the Racial Justice Movement in the United States, which the tennis star has vociferously endorsed.

“Your selection as the last torchbearer was wrong,” wrote another commenter on the Yahoo News story of the loss of Ms. Osaka. “Was the theme of the Tokyo Games human rights issues? Should it show Japan’s recovery and show appreciation to the many countries that have supported Japan? BLM is not the issue. I don’t think she could focus on the game and she deserves her defeat. “

Nathaniel M. Smith, an anthropologist at Ritsumeikan University in Kyoto who studies right wing movements in Japan, said online critics could now copy from a global pool of comments.

“A Japanese online right-winger is aware that he is in the Twitter environment of Black Lives Matter, but also as whites criticize Black Lives on Twitter,” said Smith. “So there is this common digital repertoire of how to attack.”

But he added, “I think it’s pretty far from the sensitivity or awareness of the average television viewer, let alone the average person.”

In fact, some comments on social media were more supportive of Ms. Osaka. A post from someone who claimed not to be a fan showed gratitude for their appearance at the Olympics.

“Personally, I don’t particularly like Naomi Osaka, but let me say one thing,” the poster wrote on Twitter. “Thank you for playing as the representative of Japan. Thanks for your hard work! “

Hisako Ueno and Hikari Hida contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Entertainment

Naomi Campbell Welcomes First Little one

Naomi Campbell is a mom! On Tuesday, the 50-year-old supermodel announced that she had quietly welcomed her first child, a little girl. “A wonderful little blessing has chosen me to be her mother,” she said of a photo of her holding her daughter’s feet. “It is a great honor for me to have this gentle soul in my life. There are no words to describe the lifelong bond I now share with you, my angel. There is no greater love.”

Naomi had already talked about starting a family in an interview with 2017 Evening standard Magazine. “I think about having children all the time,” she said at the time. “But now, the way science is, I think I can do it if I want to.” Congratulations to Naomi on her exciting news! See her cute snapshot of her newborn baby girl in front of you.

Image source: Getty / Kristy Sparow

Categories
Business

Naomi Levine, Lawyer Who Reworked a College, Dies at 97

Naomi Levine, who in the 1970s as executive director of the American Jewish Congress became the first woman to head a large Jewish advocacy group and who later played a key role in New York University’s transformative expansion into a high-profile institution, died on January 1 14 at her home in West Palm Beach, Florida. She was 97 years old.

The death was confirmed by her daughter, Joan Kiddon.

Ms. Levine, who grew up in the Bronx in the 1930s, initially aspired to become a teacher in a public school. But as she said, after an oral exam she was turned down for having a lisp and choosing to pursue the law instead. She attended Columbia Law School, which soon included prominent women such as pioneering feminist politician Bella Abzug, labor attorney Judith Vladeck, and federal judge Constance Baker Motley among fellow students in the 1940s.

In the 1950s, Ms. Levine joined the American Jewish Congress as an attorney on the Law and Social Action Commission. There, often in collaboration with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, she wrote pleadings on key Supreme Court cases, including Brown v Board of Education, which reduced segregation in public schools, and Sweatt v Painter, who declared the “segregated but equal “successfully questioned doctrine of Plessy v. Ferguson.

In 1963 Ms. Levine helped Rabbi Joachim Prinz write “The Issue is Silence”, a speech that expressed his solidarity with the civil rights movement and which he gave shortly before the famous “I Have a Dream” by Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. delivered speech at the March in Washington. She later taught a law and racial relations class in policing at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice.

During her lawyer career, Ms. Levine was often surrounded by men. “I knew I deserved to be there because I was so smart and often smarter than everyone else in the room,” she once said. “And if I shut up I could do a lot.”

In 1972 Ms. Levine was named executive director of the American Jewish Congress, a position that brought her visibility and influence. In an interview with the New York Times earlier this year, she reflected on the women’s movement and the balance of responsibilities between spouses.

“I still feel a little guilty about being away from home too much, and if my daughter got sick, I would stay home and take care of her – I wouldn’t expect my husband to,” said you. “Young girls think differently today and they are right.”

She summarized her view as follows: “Women’s library is probably right, but it’s not my style.”

In 1978 Ms. Levine left the American Jewish Congress and, eager for a new challenge, accepted a position at NYU. She was hired to help the troubled institution realize its ambitions of becoming a top university.

At the time, NYU was not the respected academic institution it is today. It was poorly furnished and, with its crumbling campus buildings and drab dormitories, was difficult to attract students. Ms. Levine began leading the university’s indictment toward change as the principal fundraiser, and she quickly found herself gifted at the strategic art of raising money.

She raised more than $ 2 billion over the course of two decades. Towards the end of her tenure, she raised around $ 300 million a year. In 1985 she launched an unprecedented $ 1 billion fundraiser that earned her some skepticism. However, when the feat was accomplished a decade later, the initiative was hailed as one of the most ambitious such endeavors in higher education.

By the beginning of the 21st century, NYU had reinvented itself and its expansion through Lower Manhattan continued to accelerate. A 2001 New York Times article headlined Ms. Levine, who was then senior vice president, “The Dynamo At The Heart Of The NYU Fundraiser”; The article noted that the phrase “Clear it with Naomi” had become commonplace in university administration.

“It is impossible to exaggerate Naomi’s contribution to transforming NYU,” said John Sexton, the university’s president from 2002 to 2015, in a telephone interview. “Anyone who knows the generative forces that took NYU from its nadir, which is at the beginning of its arrival, to its booth in 2000 and beyond, knows that it was one of the main generators of those forces.”

After retiring as the university’s principal fundraiser, Ms. Levine founded the George H. Heyman Jr. Center for Philanthropy and Fundraising at NYU, where she also taught a graduate course on Ethics, Law, and Corporate Governance in Nonprofits. ”She retired in 2004.

Ms. Levine’s commitment to social issues remained a career breakthrough, perhaps most personally expressed at Camp Greylock, the summer camp for girls in the Adirondacks, which she ran from 1955 to 1971.

A mail boat would bring copies of the New York Times to the warehouse, and Ms. Levine moderated current affairs discussions with campers in a dining room. She reluctantly closed the camp to concentrate on her work at the American Jewish Congress. Many campers who still proudly call themselves “Greylock Girls” have grown into leading companies in the fields of law, business and medicine.

“Regardless of age, she wanted these girls to know that they can and can be anything,” said Ms. Kiddon, her daughter. “She believed she could empower these girls for life.”

Naomi Ruth Bronheim was born in the Bronx on April 15, 1923. Her father Nathan was a salesman. Her mother, Malvina (Mermelstein) Bronheim, was a hospital secretary. When Naomi was a girl, she helped prepare a pot of flank cholent stew on Friday night to prepare for the Sabbath, and her mother sewed clothes for the family.

Naomi attended Hunter College High School and graduated from Hunter College with a BA before enrolling at Columbia Law School, where she became the editor of the Law Review. In 1948 she married Leonard Levine, an accountant who had fought in Normandy in the third wave; He died in 2001.

In addition to her daughter, two granddaughters and one great-granddaughter survived Mrs. Levine.

After Ms. Levine retired, she was awarded a presidential medal by NYU in 2005. She remained on the board of directors of the school’s Edgar M. Bronfman Center for Jewish Student Life and also advised the Taub Center for Israel Studies.

A few years ago, Ms. Levine moved to West Palm Beach where she began writing a memoir called History and Me. She also founded a book and film club at the Kravis Center (which her daughter referred to as “Lincoln Center for West Palm Beach”), where members discussed social issues. After seeing “To Kill a Mockingbird” (1962) they talked about racism in America; After Adam’s Rib (1942) they shared their views on sexism and gender inequality.

Ms. Levine hoped to show the 1933 film version of Little Women one day. In 2016, she told the Palm Beach Daily News that Katharine Hepburn’s idiosyncratic portrayal of the main character, Jo March, inspired her when she saw the film as a girl.

“She wanted to break free of being an ordinary woman,” said Ms. Levine. “That influenced my thinking.”