Tag: move

Categories
Business

Billy McFarland Is Out of Jail and Prepared for His Subsequent Transfer

Billy McFarland Is Out of Jail and Ready for His Next Move

“Is this technically Dumbo?” Billy McFarland asked, walking toward the East River shoreline. “It’s super cool. Are the rents here crazy too?

“I never spent much time in Brooklyn, until the Brooklyn detention center,” he continued. “I was always like, ‘I’m never going to live in Brooklyn.’ Now, I think it’s kind of nice.”

Mr. McFarland, who in 2018 entered guilty pleas for fraud stemming from his role in organizing the Fyre Festival — a Coachella-for-the-Bahamas affair that went spectacularly awry and established him as the Elizabeth Holmes of party promoters— had been a free man for all of 15 minutes. And he didn’t seem inclined to lay low after spending close to four years in prison, plus another six months of additional confinement.

Moments after removing an electronic ankle monitor at the Gold Street halfway house where he had stayed earlier this year, he was posing for a New York Times photographer and talking to a reporter whom he’d approached toward the end of his confinement with the help of a publicist.

“I thought it was going to be a big process, but it turns out they just hand you scissors and you cut it off,” said Mr. McFarland, 30, who is 6-foot-3 and post-prison lean. He was wearing a dark T-shirt and navy pants that he said were from Uniqlo. On his feet were Gianvito Rossi sneakers that looked like Converse All Stars, but retail for around $700.

Mr. McFarland — who has little money in the bank, around $26 million in financial amends to make and no immediate job prospects — said he had purchased the shoes before his legal problems.

“Friends joke that my entire wardrobe is from 2016,” he said.

Back then, Mr. McFarland — who grew up in Short Hills, N.J., and dropped out of Bucknell University after less than a year — was known as the founder of a company called Magnises, whose flagship charge card was pitched as a kind of American Express Black card for millennials.

Mostly, those who joined were given access to an open bar at a Greenwich Village townhouse where he held parties. Another membership perk: Bahamian excursions, including to Norman’s Cay, a small island that once served as a hub for the Medellín Cartel’s cocaine-smuggling operation.

That was the site Mr. McFarland had selected to hold an epic coming-out festival for his next invention, Fyre, an Uber-like app through which people could book their favorite celebrities for special events. He enlisted Ja Rule, Kendall Jenner, Bella Hadid and Emily Ratajkowski to help promote the 2017 party, which featured more than 30 musical guests, including Blink-182 and Tyga. Tickets cost up to $12,000.

But the Fyre Festival — which would go on to achieve cultural notoriety, if not for the reasons Mr. McFarland had intended — was poorly planned, and its finances were a mess.

The night before the first attendees arrived on the island, an intense rainstorm hit.

People showed up to find that the “luxury villas” that came with their ticket packages were, in fact, disaster relief tents located on a makeshift camping ground.

And the “uniquely authentic island cuisine” guests were promised in promotional materials turned out to be cheese sandwiches served in plastic foam containers, though Mr. McFarland countered in our interview last week that reports of the meals had been vastly overblown.

“There’s a reason there’s only one photograph of that,” he said, referring to a viral shot of a sad pile of lettuce topped by two tomato slices, above two slices of prepackaged cheese serving as a sort of garnish for two slices of untoasted wheat bread.

Ultimately, the event — which stranded thousands of attendees in the Bahamas and left them scrounging for makeshift shelter on a dark beach — was scrapped without a single performance taking place. Less than two months later, Mr. McFarland was arrested and charged with fraud.

“They took me to the Brooklyn detention center for one night,” he said. “My head was swirling with all these things, and I panicked like, ‘I need to pay everybody back tomorrow or else this is real.’”

Class-action lawsuits followed.

While on probation, Mr. McFarland launched a V.I.P. ticket service that promised users tickets he didn’t have to events including the Broadway musical “Hamilton,” the Victoria’s Secret fashion show and the Met Gala.

There was another round of fraud charges.

“I probably added years on to my sentence by doing that,” he said. “I just was making bad decision after bad decision.”

By the water in Dumbo, Mr. McFarland struck a few plaintive poses. “I can’t wait to go swimming,” he said.

He then took an Uber to his small second-floor apartment in the Bedford-Stuyvesant neighborhood.

On the curb outside his new building, he continued to speak of the borough with tourist-like wonder. “Was this street terrible years ago?” he asked. “Because there are all these nice new buildings.” (Before the Fyre Festival, Mr. McFarland had lived in the meatpacking district. “I was 21 when I moved there — cut me some slack,” he said.)

With characteristic vagueness, Mr. McFarland said the rent for his new place was being paid by “family and friends.” He did not say whether that included his parents, Steven and Irene McFarland, who are real estate developers based in New Jersey.

It had taken a lot, Mr. McFarland said, for his parents to understand that “someone they were so close to was capable of lying like I did.” He continued, “I hurt them, and it sucks.”

Had he personally apologized to his victims? “No,” he said, then posed a question of his own:

“What would you say to them if you were me?”

The terms of Mr. McFarland’s six-month house arrest allowed him to go outside only to go to the grocery store or the gym. He chose a membership at Blink Fitness, which he paid for with a debit card. “I don’t think I can get a credit card,” he said.

His new apartment was Airbnb-neutral. The only decorations were a few plants he’d picked up at Trader Joe’s — a bird of paradise, two money trees — along with a white board that was blank as the decor. The bed was perfectly made, the floor immaculate.

The work of a cleaning service? “You’re never going to believe it,” he said. “I learned how to do it!”

As Mr. McFarland recalled it, his housekeeping education began at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where he was first held, then continued at the Otisville Correctional Facility in upstate New York, where he was transferred in early 2019. “It was like Danbury,” he said, referring to the less hard-line cushy-by-prison standards facility where Martha Stewart did her time. “But I messed it up.”

Guards confiscated the drive and Mr. McFarland spent three months in solitary confinement, where he said he fell asleep to the sounds of a screaming gang member known as the White Tiger, so named because of tattoos of the animal that covered his face and other areas of his body.

After that, he was resettled at FCI Elkton, a low-security federal correctional institution located in Ohio.

Then, in 2020, the coronavirus pandemic hit. Mr. McFarland appealed for compassionate release, claiming that allergies and asthma placed him in a high risk category for health complications. His efforts were unsuccessful. “Hope clouds your judgment,” he said. “There was no way I was going to get out.”

Ultimately, prison records show, Mr. McFarland spent six months there, though the records do not specify why. His lawyer, Jason Russo, said in a phone interview that he had written letters to prison officials attempting to get Mr. McFarland out of solitary confinement, only to be stonewalled at every turn. Mr. Russo said he could not even get a specific answer as to why Mr. McFarland was there for such an extended period of time. Emails and phone calls to the prison by the New York Times were not returned.

Mr. McFarland read a lot during those months. “There was nothing else to do,” he said.

One of the books he finished was Simon Sinek’s “Start with Why: How Great Leaders Inspire Everyone to Take Action.” Another was Gregory David Roberts’s novel “Shantarum.”

“It’s about an Australian who breaks out of jail and joins the Indian mafia,” said Mr. McFarland. “Really cool.”

In Mr. McFarland’s Bedford-Stuyvesant living room, on a small shelf by the gray couch from Wayfair — “A friend bought it for me,” he said, “I couldn’t afford it” — were copies of Don Winslow’s “City on Fire” and Sebastian Mallaby’s “The Power Law: Venture Capital and the Making of the Future.”

But Mr. McFarland said hadn’t been doing as much reading since he began home confinement and acquired a Mac desktop computer with a Westinghouse screen. “I just missed the computer so much,” said Mr. McFarland. “I missed that more than anything.”

As part of his plea, Mr. McFarland is barred for life from serving as a director of a public company. His earnings will be garnished until he pays back the full amount he owes his victims, more than $25 million.

“Obviously, he’s got a lot of work ahead of him,” Mr. Russo said.

At least for now, Mr. McFarland has abandoned the idea of writing his memoir.

“The book’s not going to pay the restitution, let me put it that way,” he said.

So what will?

“I’d like to do something tech-based,” he said a few minutes later, walking to BKLYN Blend, where he ordered an egg sandwich and a coffee. “The good thing with tech is that people are so forward-thinking, and they’re more apt at taking risk.

“If I worked in finance, I think it would be harder to get back,” he continued. “Tech is more open. And the way I failed is totally wrong, but in a certain sense, failure is OK in entrepreneurship.”

Seated at a quiet table in the corner — no one at the coffee shop appeared to recognize him — Mr. McFarland mulled whether he’d prefer to work for himself or someone else. “At the end of the day, I think I could probably create the most value by building some sort of tech product,” he said. “Whether that’s within a company or by starting my own company, I’m open to both. I’ll probably decide in the next couple of weeks which path to go do.”

He said he was “not particularly interested in crypto,” though he would make an exception for the latest frontier in blockchain technology, decentralized autonomous organizations, which he said were “allowing people to come together online to effect real world change in a way they previously couldn’t, taking people to places they couldn’t get to — and, once they’re there, enabling them to effect real-world change.”

In April 2020, while in prison, Mr. McFarland made his first foray into philanthropy. He led a drive called Project 315, which raised money to cover the costs of calls between underprivileged inmates and their families. Four days after the project’s Instagram launch, fees were waived nationwide. “We did it,” the Instagram account associated with Mr. McFarland’s “non profit organization” said, claiming credit. (In fact, the suspension of fees came after campaigning by Senator Amy Klobuchar and a group of other Democratic senators that had begun well before Mr. McFarland got the idea.)

But it whetted his appetite for good works, he said. Now, Mr. McFarland is talking about forming a charity that would pay travel costs for the families of prisoners.

“I met some really amazing people in prison,” he said. “Half the people are just naturally bad and the other half are great.” (Mr. McFarland hedged, when asked which group he belonged to. “But I think I’m a better person than I was four years ago,” he said.)

Mr. McFarland said he wanted people to know that he was sorry for what went wrong with the festival and for his actions. “I deserved my sentence,” he said. “I let a lot of people down.”

He attributed his choices in part to “immaturity” and hubris.

“I didn’t know what I didn’t know,” he said.

Partly, he blamed the tech world — the very same world he was musing about re-entering — which he said sometimes operates by an “ends justify the means” ethos.

Still, he took some issue with news articles that compared him to Bernie Madoff; he wasn’t running a decades-long scheme to defraud people of their life savings, after all. Plus, he said, he hadn’t planned for things to end up the way they did.

Much was made in both the Hulu and Netflix documentaries about the local workers in the Bahamas who were stiffed when the festival was canceled and debts piled up.

Mr. McFarland argued that this characterization was somewhat misleading because, he said, most of them were working on a day-to-day or week-to-week basis, and therefore suffered limited losses. (One restaurant owner said in the Netflix documentary that she spent $50,000 of her savings preparing for the festival and received no compensation from organizers. In May 2017, she told The New York Times that she was owed $134,000.)

Two of his former Bahamian employees traveled to New York for a post-house-arrest party Mr. McFarland hosted on the evening of his release at Marylou, a French bistro in the East Village.

Ozzy Rolle, Mr. McFarland’s principle consigliere in the Exumas, an island district in the Bahamas, said the following afternoon that he’d been paid almost everything he was owed for the festival, before it imploded. “I was treated good. Probably a week I wasn’t paid for.” He even went as far as to say the Fyre Festival had been good for tourism in the Bahamas. “So many people came after reading about what happened,” he said.

But Scooter Rolle, his cousin and travel companion, said he had yet to get a dime of what he was owed for his work, in the days before Fyre. “I came to clarify things,” he said.

That didn’t exactly happen, but Mr. McFarland did buy him a post-party lobster roll at Sarabeth’s Kitchen. “Billy tried his best,” he said.

Back at the Bed-Stuy cafe, Mr. McFarland said the biggest sin he had committed was digging himself in deeper with dishonesty.

“I lied,” he said. “I think I was scared. And the fear was letting down people who believed in me — showing them they weren’t right.”

Categories
Politics

Crypto’s Speedy Transfer Into Banking Elicits Alarm in Washington

Crypto’s Rapid Move Into Banking Elicits Alarm in Washington

BlockFi, a fast-growing financial start-up whose headquarters in Jersey City are across the Hudson River from Wall Street, aspires to be the JPMorgan Chase of cryptocurrency.

It offers credit cards, loans and interest-generating accounts. But rather than dealing primarily in dollars, BlockFi operates in the rapidly expanding world of digital currencies, one of a new generation of institutions effectively creating an alternative banking system on the frontiers of technology.

“We are just at the beginning of this story,” said Flori Marquez, 30, a founder of BlockFi, which was created in 2017 and claims to have more than $10 billion in assets, 850 employees and more than 450,000 retail clients who can obtain loans in minutes, without credit checks.

But to state and federal regulators and some members of Congress, the entry of crypto into banking is cause for alarm. The technology is disrupting the world of financial services so quickly and unpredictably that regulators are far behind, potentially leaving consumers and financial markets vulnerable.

In recent months, top officials from the Federal Reserve and other banking regulators have urgently begun what they are calling a “crypto sprint” to try to catch up with the rapid changes and figure out how to curb the potential dangers from an emerging industry whose short history has been marked as much by high-stakes speculation as by technological advances.

In interviews and public statements, federal officials and state authorities are warning that the crypto financial services industry is in some cases vulnerable to hackers and fraud and reliant on risky innovations. Last month, the crypto platform PolyNetwork briefly lost $600 million of its customers’ assets to hackers, much of which was returned only after the site’s founders begged the thieves to relent.

“We need additional authorities to prevent transactions, products and platforms from falling between regulatory cracks,” Gary Gensler, the chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, wrote in August in a letter to Senator Elizabeth Warren, Democrat of Massachusetts, about the dangers of cryptocurrency products. “We also need more resources to protect investors in this growing and volatile sector.”

The S.E.C. has created a stand-alone office to coordinate investigations into cryptocurrency and other digital assets, and it has recruited academics with related expertise to help it track the fast-moving changes. Acknowledging that it could take at least a year to write rules or get legislation passed in Congress, regulators may issue interim guidance to set some expectations to exert control over the industry.

BlockFi has already been targeted by regulators in five states that have accused it of violating local securities laws.

Regulators’ worries reach to even more experimental offerings by outfits like PancakeSwap, whose “syrup pools” boast that users can earn up to 91 percent annual return on crypto deposits.

Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen and Jerome H. Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, have also voiced concerns, even as the Fed and other central banks study whether to issue digital currencies of their own.

Mr. Powell has pointed to the proliferation of so-called stablecoins, digital currencies whose value is typically pegged to the dollar and are frequently used in digital money transfers and other transactions like lending.

“We have a tradition in this country where, you know, where the public’s money is held in what is supposed to be a very safe asset,” Mr. Powell said during congressional testimony in July, adding, “That doesn’t exist really for stablecoins.”

The cryptocurrency banking frontier features a wide range of companies. At one end are those that operate on models similar to those of traditional consumer-oriented banks, like BlockFi or Kraken Bank, which has secured a special charter in Wyoming and hopes by the end of this year to take consumers’ cryptocurrency deposits — but without traditional Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance.

On the more radical end is decentralized finance, or DeFi, which is more akin to Wall Street for cryptocurrency. Players include Compound, a company in San Francisco that operates completely outside the regulatory system. DeFi eliminates human intermediaries like brokers, bank clerks and traders, and instead uses algorithms to execute financial transactions, such as lending and borrowing.

“Crypto is the new shadow bank,” Ms. Warren said in an interview. “It provides many of the same services, but without the consumer protections or financial stability that back up the traditional system.”

“It’s like spinning straw into gold,” she added.

Lawmakers and regulators are worried that consumers are not always fully aware of the potential dangers of the new banklike crypto services and decentralized finance platforms. Crypto deposit accounts are not federally insured and holdings may not be guaranteed if markets go haywire.

People who borrow against their crypto could face liquidation of their holdings, sometimes in entirely automated markets that are unregulated.

BlockFi’s extraordinary growth — and the recent crackdown by state regulators — illustrates the fraught path of cryptocurrency financial services companies amid confusion about what they do.

BlockFi’s business is not dissimilar to that of a regular bank. It takes deposits of cryptocurrencies and pays interest on them. It makes loans in dollars to people who put up cryptocurrency as collateral. And it lends crypto to institutions that need it.

For consumers, the main allure of BlockFi is the chance to take loans in dollars up to half of the value of their crypto collateral, allowing customers to get cash without the tax hit of selling their digital assets, or to leverage the value of holdings to buy more cryptocurrency. The company also offers interest of up to 8 percent per year on crypto deposits, compared with a national average of 0.06 percent for savings deposits at banks in August.

How can BlockFi offer such a high rate? In addition to charging interest on the loans it makes to consumers, it lends cryptocurrency to institutions like Fidelity Investments or Susquehanna International Group that use those assets for quick and sometimes lucrative cryptocurrency arbitrage transactions, passing on high returns to customers. And because BlockFi is not officially a bank, it does not have the large costs associated with maintaining required capital reserves and following other banking regulations.

Also unlike a bank, BlockFi does not check credit scores, relying instead on the value of customers’ underlying crypto collateral. The company’s executives argue that the approach democratizes financial services, opening them to people without the traditional hallmarks of reliability — like good credit — but with digital assets.

The model has worked for BlockFi. It is hiring employees from London to Singapore, while prominent investors — like Bain Capital, Winklevoss Capital and Coinbase Ventures — have jumped in to fund its expansion. The company has raised at least $450 million in capital.

But to regulators, BlockFi’s offerings are worrying and perplexing — so much so that in California, where BlockFi first sought a lender’s license, officials initially advised it to instead apply for a pawnbroker license. Their reasoning was that customers seeking a loan from BlockFi hand over cryptocurrency holdings as collateral in the same way that a customer might give a pawnshop a watch in exchange for cash.

Ms. Marquez of BlockFi called the sheriff’s office in San Francisco about a pawnbroker license, only to be redirected again. “No, pawnbrokers’ licenses are only for physical goods,” she recounted being told. “And because crypto is a virtual asset, this license actually does not apply to you.”

Undeterred, she returned to the state’s banking regulators and persuaded them BlockFi qualified as a lender, albeit of a new variety. The company now has licenses in at least 28 states, which it uses for cryptocurrency deposits from its more than 450,000 clients — many of whom are outside the United States. In the first three months of this year, the value of crypto held in BlockFi interest-bearing accounts more than tripled to $14.7 billion from $4.4 billion, a jump driven in part by the rise in the price of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

As the company has expanded, regulators have become increasingly concerned. New Jersey’s attorney general sent it a “cease and desist” letter in July, saying it sells a financial product that requires a securities license, with all the associated obligations, including mandated disclosures.

“No one gets a free pass simply because they’re operating in the fast-evolving cryptocurrency market,” the acting attorney general, Andrew J. Bruck, said.

BlockFi does not adequately notify customers of risks associated with its use of their cryptocurrency deposits for borrowing pools, including the “creditworthiness of borrowers, the type and nature of transactions,” officials in Texas added in their own complaint, echoing allegations made by state officials in Alabama, Kentucky and Vermont.

Zac Prince, BlockFi’s chief executive, said that the company was complying with the law but that regulators did not fully understand its offerings. “Ultimately, we see this as an opportunity for BlockFi to help define the regulatory environment for our ecosystem,” he wrote in a note to customers.

The regulatory challenge is even greater when it comes to other emerging crypto finance developers in the world of DeFi, such as Compound, SushiSwap and Aave as well as PancakeSwap.

They are all essentially automated markets run by computer programs facilitating transactions without human intervention — the crypto-era version of trading floors. The idea is to eliminate intermediaries and bring together buyers and sellers on the blockchain, the technology behind cryptocurrency. The sites do not even collect users’ personal information.

Founders of those kinds of platforms argue that they are just building a “protocol” ultimately led by a community of users, with the computer code effectively running the show.

Robert Leshner, 37, started Compound in 2018 after spending a year in a tiny attic office sublet in the Mission district in San Francisco with five colleagues, experimenting with a computer program that would become part of the foundation of the DeFi movement.

Compound — backed by prominent crypto venture capitalists like Andreessen Horowitz and Coinbase Ventures — now has more than $20 billion in assets. Each of the nearly 300,000 “customers” is represented by a unique 42-character list of letters and numbers. But Compound does not know their names or even what country they are from.

Mr. Leshner and others who helped set up Compound own a large share of its self-issued cryptocurrency token — known as COMP — which has surged in value, making him worth, at least on paper, tens of millions of dollars.

Mr. Leshner has been startled by the rapid growth. “At every juncture, the speed at which decentralized finance has just, like, started to work, has caught myself and everybody off guard,” he said.

Industry executives say concerns about the safety and stability of digital assets are overblown, but federal financial regulators are still working to get a handle on the latest developments.

DeFi protocols largely rely upon stablecoins, cryptocurrencies that are ostensibly pegged to the United States dollar for a steady value but without guarantees that their value is adequately backed.

The overall market of stablecoins has ballooned to $117 billion as of early September from $3.3 billion in January 2019. That has regulators worried.

“These things are effectively treated by users as bank deposits,” said Lee Reiners, a former supervisor at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. “But unlike actual deposits, they are not insured by F.D.I.C., and if account holders begin to have concerns that they cannot get money out, they might try and trigger a bank run.”

One option worth considering, Ms. Warren said, is to ban banks in the United States from holding cash deposits backing up stablecoins, which could effectively end the surging market. Another possibility that some say could undermine the entire crypto ecosystem is the creation of a government-issued digital dollar.

“You wouldn’t need stablecoins, you wouldn’t need cryptocurrencies if you had a digital U.S. currency,” Mr. Powell, the Fed chairman, said in July. “I think that’s one of the stronger arguments in its favor.”

Categories
Politics

Texas abortion legislation in impact as Supreme Courtroom makes no transfer to dam it

Texas abortion law in effect as Supreme Court makes no move to block it

Pedestrians walk past the US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, United States on Sunday, June 20, 2021.

Stefani Reynolds | Bloomberg | Getty Images

A Texas law banning most abortions went into effect Wednesday after the Supreme Court failed to respond to an urgency complaint to block its enforcement.

A group of abortion providers and advocates, including Planned Parenthood, had asked the Supreme Court to temporarily block enforcement of the law that would ban most abortions as early as six weeks of gestation.

The petitioners say the law would set Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 case that enshrined women’s right to abortion, essentially overturning it.

In response, a group of Texas officials, including Attorney General Ken Paxton, urged the Supreme Court to reject their opponents’ offer to thwart the law, calling the request “bold”.

SB 8 was enacted in May by Republican Governor Greg Abbott. It prohibits doctors from performing or having abortions after they “detect a fetal heartbeat in the unborn child” except in medical emergencies.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

The law prohibits state officials from enforcing these rules. Rather, it empowers anyone to bring civil actions against anyone who performs abortions or “helps or assists” them after a heartbeat is detected. These lawsuits can earn a minimum of $ 10,000 in “legal damages” per abortion.

If it went into effect, the bill would “immediately and catastrophically restrict access to abortion in Texas, ban the care of at least 85% of abortion patients in Texas,” and likely force many providers to shut down, the urgency motion filed Monday said .

This motion was filed directly with Conservative Judge Samuel Alito, who is handling inquiries from the Lone Star State. It was filed days after a lower appeals court refused to block implementation of the law.

Alito had asked respondents to respond to the appeal by 5 p.m. ET Tuesday.

“In less than two days, Texan politicians will have effectively overthrown Roe v. Wade,” said Nancy Northup, CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, whose organization helped the Supreme Court filing the motion, in a statement Monday.

The Supreme Court, which has a conservative majority of 6: 3 after the administration of former President Donald Trump, is already supposed to hear arguments in a potentially decisive abortion case from Mississippi. This state has urged judges to reconsider existing precedents preventing states from banning abortions that occur before the fetus is viable.

This is the evolution of news. Please check again for updates.

– CNBC’s Christine Wang contributed to this report.

Categories
Health

Scientists blast U.S. transfer as untimely

Scientists blast U.S. move as premature

A nurse administers a COVID-19 booster shot to Joe Rigdon at a vaccination site in Eastmonte Park, Altamonte Springs.

Paul Hennessy | LightRocket | Getty Images

Scientists sharply criticized the Biden administration’s push to widely distribute Covid-19 vaccine booster shots in the U.S. next month, saying the data provided by federal health officials this week wasn’t compelling enough to recommend third shots to most of the American population right now.

U.S. health leaders say they are preparing to offer booster shots to all eligible Americans beginning the week of Sept. 20. The plan, outlined Wednesday by CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock, White House chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci and other health officials, calls for a third dose eight months after people get their second shot of either the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines.

They cited three new studies, released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, that showed their protection against Covid diminished over several months. One study in New York from May 3 through July 25 showed that vaccine protection against infection dropped from around 92% to 80%. Another study by the Mayo Clinic showed that Pfizer’s vaccine efficacy fell from around 76% to 42% while Moderna’s declined from 86% to 76%.

“Taken together, you can see that while the exact percentage of vaccine effectiveness over time differs depending on the cohort and settings study, the data consistently demonstrate a reduction of vaccine effectiveness against infection over time,” Walensky told reporters during a White House Covid press briefing.

But scientists and other health experts said the data they cited wasn’t compelling, characterizing the administration’s push for boosters as premature. While the data did suggest there was a reduction in protection against mild and moderate disease, the two-dose vaccines still held up well against severe disease and hospitalizations, scientists said.

For example, the New York study released by the CDC showed there were 9,675 infections among fully vaccinated adults, compared with 38,505 infections among unvaccinated adults during the period examined. Among the fully vaccinated people who were infected, 1,271 were hospitalized, accounting for roughly 15% of all Covid hospitalizations.

“People are still highly protected against severe disease, hospitalization, and death. This is what vaccines are supposed to do,” said Dr. Anna Durbin, a vaccine researcher at Johns Hopkins University. “If we start seeing significant upticks of more severe disease and hospitalizations in vaccinated people, that would be a signal to consider boosters.”

The body’s immune system is complex, Durbin said. While the presence of antibodies induced by the vaccine may decline, resulting in a rise in breakthrough infections, the body has other mechanisms, like T cells, that may protect someone from getting seriously sick, she said.

“The data are showing that yes, we are seeing breakthrough infections but, the infections are mild or moderate colds,” she said.

To be sure, federal health officials said the vaccines are still holding up against severe disease over time, even as their ability to prevent infections declines. They said, based on their latest assessment, “the current protection against severe disease, hospitalization, and death could diminish in the months ahead, especially among those who are at higher risk or were vaccinated during the earlier phases of the vaccination rollout.”

There are some groups in the U.S. who would benefit from a third dose right now, according to Dr. Archana Chatterjee, a member of the Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.

Data does support the need for booster doses primarily among those who are moderate to severely immunocompromised, Chatterjee said. Federal health officials on Friday approved giving booster shots to such people – which include cancer and HIV patients and people who have had organ transplants – after data suggested they don’t produce an adequate immune response after getting two doses.

As of now, “breakthrough infections in the general public tend to be asymptomatic or mild,” she said.

People who are 65 or older or living in a long-term care facility may also benefit from a booster shot, said Dr. Isaac Bogoch, an infectious disease specialist at the University of Toronto,

Israel, a country U.S. officials have also cited in their push for boosters, has begun giving out third doses to the elderly after new data showed a reduction in the effectiveness of Pfizer’s Covid vaccine against severe illness among people 65 and older who were fully vaccinated in January or February.

“Do we all need a third dose of a vaccine right now? No, we don’t. Do some people need a third dose of a vaccine right now? Yes. Will we need a third dose of a vaccine in the near future? Maybe,” Bogoch said in a phone interview.

Dr. Priya Sampathkumar, an epidemiologist at the Mayo Clinic, agreed, saying a booster could be needed for the general public in the future, but not right now. “There isn’t enough data to support the third booster for all at this point,” she said.

Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization’s Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law, said federal health officials should put their focus elsewhere: the unvaccinated, both in the U.S. and around the world.

Earlier this month, the WHO asked wealthy nations to stop distributing booster shots until at least the end of September to give poorer countries the chance to vaccinate their populations with the first rounds of shots. 

Shortly after the U.S. announced its booster plan, the international agency condemned wealthy nations that support boosters for the general public.

“Boosting the entire U.S. population while poor people are dying in poor countries is tone-deaf and is widely viewed as uncaring,” Gostin said. “It’s also a slap in the face to WHO after it called for a booster moratorium.”

U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy defended the administration’s booster plan on CNBC on Wednesday, saying health officials decided to give boosters to the general public at the eight-month mark as a way “to stay ahead of this virus.”

“We are making plans now, because No. 1, you’ve got to plan ahead, but two, we wanted the public to know what we were seeing in the data, in our effort to be transparent and open with the public,” Murthy told “The News with Shepard Smith.”

During a White House briefing Tuesday, press secretary Jen Psaki said the administration believes it can boost the American population while ensuring the rest of the world gets vaccinated.

“We believe that is a false choice. We can do both,” Psaki said, adding that the U.S. is contributing more vaccine doses than any other nation to fight Covid across the globe. “We will continue to be the arsenal for vaccines around the world. We also have enough supply and had long planned enough supply should a booster be needed for the eligible population.”

Categories
Health

Tennessee transfer to halt vaccine outreach to teenagers ‘extremely disturbing’

Tennessee move to halt vaccine outreach to teens 'incredibly disturbing'

Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Dr. Rochelle Walensky testifies during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing to examine the FY 2022 budget request for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on May 19, 2021 in Washington,DC.

Jim Lo Scalzo | AFP | Getty Images

Tennessee’s decision to cease vaccine outreach to teenagers while in the midst of a pandemic is “incredibly disturbing,” the head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Thursday.

“I find this incredibly disturbing. Not only is it disturbing for Covid, but it is disturbing for all vaccine-preventable illnesses,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in an interview Thursday with CBS This Morning.

The state’s department of health reportedly decided to cease adolescent vaccine outreach for all vaccines, not just for Covid, effectively ending all government communication or education initiatives to teens in the state about vaccines.

The decision made headlines when the state’s medical director for vaccine-preventable diseases and immunization programs at the Tennessee Department of Health, Dr. Michelle Fiscus, was fired after she sent a memo to physicians outlining state policy that allows minors to seek medical care without parental approval.

Department spokesman Bill Christian said in a statement to CNBC that the state hasn’t halted its immunization program for children and continues to support “those outreach efforts. Providing information and access are routine public health functions, and that has not changed.”

He didn’t specifically say whether the state’s outreach program itself was halted.

The Tennessean, a newspaper in Nashville reported on Tuesday that it had gained access to internal reports and emails that instructs Tennessee Department of Health staff to subsequently strip the agency’s logo off of any disseminated vaccine education materials.

In another email that the Tennessean claims was sent from the agency’s Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Tim Jones, he told staff they should do “no proactive outreach regarding routine vaccines.” Staff was also reportedly told not to do any pre-planning for flu shots events at schools. In the emails, Jones reportedly said that any school-related vaccine information should come from the state’s Department of Education.

The newspaper also claims that internal documents reportedly indicate that the agency was directed by Health Commissioner Dr. Lisa Piercey to halt all Covid vaccine events on school property and to no longer send postcards or other notices reminding adolescents to return for their second doses of Covid shots.

On Thursday, the agency released a statement labeling the circulating reports as misinformation. “There has been no disruption to the childhood immunization program or access to the Covid-19 vaccine while the department has evaluated annual marketing efforts intended for parents,” Piercey said in the statement.

The statement does not address reports that the agency halted vaccine outreach for adolescents.

Fiscus said she began to feel the pressure after she highlighted a public document from a state Supreme Court case ruling that allows residents above the age of 14 to seek medical treatment without the consent of a parent “unless the physician believes that the minor is not sufficiently mature to make his or her own health care decisions,” according to the ruling.

“I am not a political operative, I am a physician,” Fiscus told MSNBC. She said she was told she was “poking the bear” and that she needed to work on her political awareness after publicizing the public document. Republican lawmakers likened the state’s adolescent vaccine outreach to peer pressure, she said.

Tennessee has one of the worst Covid vaccination rates in the country, fully immunizing just 38% of its total population, according to CDC data. The state is also seeing increasing Covid cases, with the average number of daily new cases spiking from 177 to 418 in just the past two weeks.

“We now have our most hesitant population being rural male conservative whites, who really do hang their hat on this political ideology that Covid-19 isn’t real, isn’t a threat, or that getting the vaccine somehow props up the left-wing part of our political system,” she told MSNBC.

The state and others with low vaccination rates are starting to see cases climb as the delta variant takes hold in the U.S.

“This is something that we anticipated … that we would see in areas of high vaccination, low case rates, and now we see in areas of low vaccination, high case rates,” Walensky said.

Walensky said a spike in infections could come in the next few months but that if more people get vaccinated now, the nation can “prevent what could happen in the fall.”

Correction: A previous version of the headline misquoted Dr. Rochelle Walensky.

Categories
World News

G-20 monetary leaders agree to maneuver ahead on plan for a world tax crackdown

G-20 financial leaders agree to move forward on plan for an international tax crackdown

Italian carabinieri guard St. Mark’s Square, the day before the meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bankers in Venice on July 8, 2021.

ANDREAS SOLARO | AFP | Getty Images

The group of 20 major economies’ financiers said they had agreed on a “more stable and fairer international tax architecture,” according to a communique from Saturday’s meeting.

The G-20 is a forum for the governments and central bank governors of 20 major economies. At a meeting of the group’s finance ministers and central bank governors, leaders endorsed components of a tax plan, including multinational corporate profits redistribution and a global minimum tax, after “many years of discussion and building on the progress made over the past year.” They write.

The group aims to see national leaders adopt the plan at a G-20 summit in October.

According to Reuters, the pact would set a minimum global corporate tax of at least 15% to prevent multinational companies from shopping at the lowest tax rate. The deal would also change the way companies like Amazon and Alphabets Google are taxed, based in part on where they sell products and services rather than where their headquarters are located.

Reuters reported that Federal Finance Minister Olaf Scholz had confirmed that all G-20 economies were on board the pact. Meanwhile, US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said a handful of smaller countries are still against it, including low-tax countries like Ireland and Hungary, but are being encouraged to join by October.

Categories
Politics

U.S. to Transfer Afghans Who Aided Troops to Third International locations

U.S. to Move Afghans Who Aided Troops to Third Countries

WASHINGTON – Biden’s administration is preparing to move thousands of Afghan interpreters, drivers, and others who have worked with American forces to other countries to protect them while they apply for entry into the United States, high-ranking officials said Administrative officers.

With the American military in the final phase of withdrawal from Afghanistan after 20 years of war, the White House has come under heavy pressure from lawmakers and the military to protect Afghan allies from Taliban revenge attacks and the lengthy and complex process that makes them special Provide immigrant visas.

On Wednesday, administrative officials began notifying lawmakers that they will soon begin a potentially massive move of tens of thousands of Afghans. Officials said Afghans would be deported from Afghanistan to third countries to await processing of their visa applications to enter the United States.

Officials did not want to say where the Afghans would be waiting and it is not clear if third countries have agreed to accept them. The opportunity to move is given to people who have already started the application process.

More than 18,000 Afghans who worked as interpreters, drivers, engineers, security, repairs, and embassy workers for the United States during the war are trapped in bureaucratic limbo after applying for special immigrant visas that are available to people because of their Labor are threatened for the US government.

These applicants have 53,000 family members, officials said.

A senior administrative official said the plan would also move family members of applicants from Afghanistan to a third country to await visa processing. Transportation from Afghanistan will not come with an assurance that a US visa will be issued. It was unclear whether people who somehow failed to qualify would be sent back to Afghanistan or left in a third country.

The officers spoke for anonymity as they were not allowed to speak publicly about the decision.

The decision is made as President Biden prepares to meet with President Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan on Friday amid deteriorating security in the country.

Aides said Mr Biden would urge Mr Ghani on the need for unity among the country’s leaders and call on them to stop fighting among themselves if the country is in crisis and government forces are at risk of seizing control of the nation to lose the Taliban.

They said he would pledge Mr. Ghani continued financial assistance from the United States to the Afghan government and people, including a humanitarian aid package of $ 266 million and $ 3.3 billion in security and substantial assistance Combating the coronavirus pandemic with vaccines, test kits and personal protective equipment.

Updated

June 23, 2021, 7:57 p.m. ET

Officials said the government has been working to streamline the visa process for Afghans who have worked with U.S. forces and has added people to process the applications.

Both in the House of Representatives and in the Senate, the pressure on the government has grown steadily in recent weeks to act quickly for the Afghans. Lawmakers urged Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III and General Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, at a Pentagon budget hearing on Wednesday.

“These brave Afghan partners, these Afghan and American heroes, people we asked to risk their lives not just for Afghanistan but for America because we have their backs, their future is in your hands,” he said Rep. Seth Moulton, a Massachusetts Democrat and a former naval officer.

“That much is certain,” said Mr. Moulton during the House Armed Services Committee hearing. “The Taliban will kill them if they can. And they will rape and murder their wives and children first if they can. “

Mr. Austin seemed to be hinting at the plans. “I am confident that sometime soon we will start evacuating some of these people,” he said.

General Milley said the military is ready to relocate Afghans who have applied for special visas. “I feel it is a moral imperative to care for those who have served by our side,” he said. “We are ready to do whatever we are asked to do.”

Chronic delays and traffic jams plagued the special immigrant visa program for more than a decade. Democrats have accused former President Donald J. Trump of exacerbating the problem by starving the program of resources and personnel.

The coronavirus pandemic didn’t help; A surge in cases at the embassy in Kabul has suspended face-to-face interviews and reviews.

In a January report by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, “limited staffing” and “local security conditions directly related to the Covid-19 pandemic” were referred to as “severe” on the visa application process.

In recent weeks, Democrats and Republicans have tabled bills in Congress to expedite the process and waive certain requirements, such as requiring applicants to undergo costly medical exams. And in December, under a huge fallback bill, Congress raised the overall visa program cap by 4,000 to 26,500.

The Biden government has also come under pressure from several nonprofit groups and refugee advocates to do more.

About 70 organizations recently wrote a letter to Mr. Biden urging his government to “immediately implement plans to evacuate vulnerable US-affiliated Afghans” – a move the White House is now taking.

Categories
Politics

Republicans Transfer to Restrict a Grass-Roots Custom of Direct Democracy

Republicans Move to Limit a Grass-Roots Tradition of Direct Democracy

In 2008, deep blue California banned same-sex marriage. In 2018, staunchly conservative Arkansas and Missouri raised their minimum wages. And last year, Republican-controlled Arizona and Montana legalized recreational marijuana.

These moves were all the result of electoral initiatives, a centuries-old body of American democracy that allowed voters to bypass their legislation to pass new laws, often with results that contradict the wishes of the elected officials of the state. While in the past they have been a bilateral instrument, in recent years Democrats have been particularly successful in using electoral initiatives to advance their agenda in conservative states where they have few other options.

But this year Republican lawmakers in Florida, Idaho, South Dakota, and other states passed laws restricting the use of the practice. This is part of a broader GOP attempt to secure political control for years to come, along with new legislation restricting electoral access and the party-political redesign of congressional districts that will take place in the coming months.

According to the Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, a liberal group that tracks and supports community-based referendums, Republicans passed 144 bills in 2021 to restrict voting initiatives in 32 states. Of these bills, 19 were signed into law by nine Republican governors. In three states, Republican lawmakers have asked voters to approve electoral initiatives that limit their own right to initiate and pass future electoral initiatives.

“They have implemented web after web of technical details and hurdles that make it really difficult for community-based groups to qualify for the vote and to counter why electoral initiatives were launched in the first place,” said Chris Melody Fields Figueredo, the managing director of the strategy center of the election initiative. “This is directly related to every attack we have seen on our democracy.”

In recent years, Democrats have used electoral initiatives to bypass Republican-controlled legislation, pass laws in red states that raised the minimum wage, legalized marijuana, expanded Medicaid, introduced impartial redistribution and apologetic absentee voting, and restored voting rights for people with it Convictions for criminal offenses.

Republicans seek to block this path in a variety of ways, including blunt measures that target the process directly and others that are more subtle.

“Petitioners have been very resourceful,” said Senator Al Novstrup, a 66-year-old Republican with glasses who sponsored the bill because the text of electoral initiatives is often too small for him to read. “There is no limit to the size of the paper.”

In Mississippi last week, the state’s Conservative Supreme Court, which ruled on a Republican lawsuit, technically invalidated the entire state initiative process, held a 2020 referendum legalizing medical marijuana, and the effort To collect signatures to bring Medicaid’s expansion into the state, suspended 2022 ballot. The constitutional amendment that created the state’s initiative law was passed in 1992 when the state had five congressional districts, each requiring signatures from voters. Mississippi has only four counties as of the 2000 census.

In Florida, Governor Ron DeSantis signed a bill that imposed a limit of $ 3,000 on campaign contributions to electoral initiatives. This cuts off an important source of income to subsidize the collection of signatures for petitions.

The Republican efforts, which are now gaining traction, have been in full swing for years.

In South Dakota in recent years, Republicans have limited the window of time for collecting petition signatures to the cold winter months, encouraging all recruiters to register with the state and wear state-issued IDs while collecting signatures. These are hurdles that according to the few Democrats in the state have increased the difficulty of qualifying for the vote.

“Republicans have every national office, 85 percent of the legislature and every constitutional office,” said Reynold F. Nesiba, one of three Democrats in the 35-member Senate. “The only place Democrats can make progress is in the action process in place, and Republicans want to take that away, too.”

Now the state’s Republican legislature will propose a constitutional amendment to voters in South Dakota to raise the threshold for passing referenda – and raise it to 60 percent by simple majority. (The threshold to raise the threshold? Still only 50 percent.)

The question will appear on the state’s main ballot for June 2022, which is expected to be dominated by Republican competitions. The new threshold could apply to the November 2022 general election, if a referendum on the expansion of Medicaid is expected before voters.

Republican Senator Lee Schoenbeck said in March that he specifically intended to block Medicaid’s expansion.

“It is fair protection for the citizens of our state,” he said on Thursday.

The proposals to limit electoral initiatives are part of an ongoing campaign by Conservatives to stifle progressive political efforts. To get a referendum on the vote, petitioners have to collect tens of thousands of signatures. The numbers vary depending on the state. The process can cost millions, so initiative campaigns are often signed by large donors.

In Arizona, Republicans have been smart since 2018 when Tom Steyer, the billionaire Democrat who later ran for president, helped fund an ultimately unsuccessful effort to pass a constitutional amendment that would put half of the state’s energy from renewables Sources.

In February, Tim Dunn, a representative of the Republican state, tabled a resolution to raise the threshold for an electoral initiative from a majority to 55 percent.

“If you look at the actual people actually voting on an electoral initiative, the number of people is quite small compared to the citizens of Arizona, and outside money could affect that pretty easily,” Dunn said.

Florida Republicans gave similar rationale for a new law signed by Governor Ron DeSantis that limits contributions to a citizen-led election initiative to $ 3,000 per person. Republicans were frustrated with some donors who supported electoral initiatives, including John Morgan, a wealthy Orlando attorney who spent millions of dollars on efforts to legalize medical marijuana Raise the minimum wage to $ 15 an hour.

However, civil rights groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, have said the new law will effectively stamp out community-based electoral initiatives, which often require substantial funding to collect signatures.

Campaigns like this are so expensive, proponents say, because of a cascade of restrictions Florida law has placed on the initiative. Recently, lawmakers cut the time it takes for signatures to expire in half. banned the practice of paying signature collectors per signature; urged those collecting signatures to use a separate piece of paper for each signature; and required that every signature be verified, which forbade a much cheaper “random sample” process.

“With every successful initiative or major effort that lawmakers don’t approve, there is a new law that makes it more expensive and burdensome to propose an initiative,” said Nicholas Warren, attorney at the Florida ACLU.

Republican sponsors of the new Florida law agree that constitutional amendments will be harder to pass. That is their goal.

“I’m not denying that holding a referendum on voting under the law will be more difficult, but that’s the point,” said Senator Ray Rodrigues, a Republican who sponsored the bill.

In Missouri, 22 Republican-sponsored bills this year attempted to restrict the state’s electoral initiative process, including a bill that would double the number of signatures required to qualify for the ballot and the threshold for passing one Measure increased from a simple majority to two thirds, that would be the highest in the country.

“These were really just politicians trying to dramatically restrict Missourians’ constitutional rights to use the process while telling us it was for our own good,” said Richard von Glahn, Missouri Jobs With political director Justice, a progressive organization.

In Idaho, Republican Governor Brad Little signed law last month that makes it significantly more difficult to meet the signature requirements for an initiative to be added to the ballot. Previously, an initiative required signatures from 6 percent of the population of 18 different legislative districts. The new law, signed by Mr. Little, now requires signatures from 6 percent of residents in each of Idaho’s 35 legislative districts.

And in Mississippi, the state Supreme Court ruled last week that the initiative process was “impractical and non-functional” because the number of statutory Congressional districts and the number of districts the state currently has differ.

Mayor Mary Hawkins Butler of Madison, Miss., A Republican who filed the lawsuit that led to the invalidation of the state initiative process, said the legal action was designed to protect her city’s ability to deter marijuana retailers through zoning.

“There were government officials who knew it needed to be corrected,” Ms. Butler said of the voting process. “If we want to move forward in the state and protect the initiative process, this must be corrected. If it’s buggy, the only option is to start over. “

Categories
Business

U.S. and Europe Transfer Nearer to Truce in Trump-Period Commerce Spat: Dwell Updates

Working on a steel pipe at the Iron S.p.A. factory in Assisi, Italy. Former President Donald J. Trump’s administration imposed steel tariffs on several countries in 2018.

Here’s what you need to know:

Credit…Gianni Cipriano for The New York Times

The United States and the European Union said Monday they had begun discussions to resolve a conflict over steel and aluminum imports that was a major front in the Trump administration’s trade wars and a serious burden on trans-Atlantic relations.

As part of a truce announced Monday, the European Union will not, as planned, increase tariffs on products like United States whiskey, orange juice and motorcycles, which the bloc imposed in 2018 in retaliation for duties that the Trump administration imposed on European steel and aluminum. The higher tariffs were scheduled to take effect June 1.

The talks about steel and aluminum are part of an effort by the Biden administration to rebuild relations between the United States and Europe after the Trump administration treated the bloc like an adversary, sometimes threatening to leave NATO and citing national security as a justification for charging 25 percent tariffs on imports of European steel and 10 percent on aluminum.

In March, the United States and European Union temporarily suspended tariffs on billions of dollars of each others’ aircraft, wine, food and other products as they worked to settle a long-running dispute involving Boeing and Airbus, the two leading airplane manufacturers. The United States also temporarily suspended retaliatory tariffs against British products like Scotch whisky that had been imposed as part of the dispute over aircraft subsidies.

Some European officials had hoped President Biden would simply lift the Trump-era tariffs, which are unpopular with businesses on both sides of the Atlantic. But the administration is moving cautiously and is likely to seek something in return, mindful that the tariffs are welcomed in steelmaking regions like Pennsylvania.

In a joint statement, Katherine Tai, the U.S. trade representative; Gina M. Raimondo, the secretary of commerce; and Valdis Dombrovskis, the top European Union trade official, said they would discuss how to address a global glut in steel products that poses “a serious threat to the market-oriented E.U. and U.S. steel and aluminum industries and the workers in those industries.”

The United States and European Union are “allies and partners, sharing similar national security interests as democratic, market economies,” the officials said, adding that they would work together to “hold countries like China that support trade-distorting policies to account.”

Starbucks has announced that masks will be optional for vaccinated customers as of Monday, unless local regulations require them.Credit…Eze Amos for The New York Times

Target on Monday joined a growing list of retailers, restaurants and theme parks that will allow fully vaccinated customers to go mask free, following new coronavirus safety guidance from the federal government last week that said vaccinated people rarely transmit the virus.

[Answers to your questions about vaccines and masks at work.]

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on Thursday took many businesses by surprise when it said that people who are vaccinated could go maskless in most places, including indoors. For businesses, the announcement was complicated by the fact that C.D.C. guidance does not override state and local rules. But several major companies have already moved to relax mask requirements. Businesses for the most part have not said they would require customers to show proof that they have been vaccinated.

Here’s the latest on companies that are changing their mask policies.

Costco, which has more than 500 U.S. stores, said it would allow fully vaccinated customers to go mask-free where state and local guidance allowed. The retailer said it would “not require proof of vaccination” but would ask for its customers’ “responsible and respectful cooperation with this revised policy.”

Publix, which has 1,270 grocery stores in the Southeast, said “face coverings are optional for fully vaccinated individuals inside Publix stores” subject to local regulations.

Starbucks, which has 32,000 cafes worldwide, said that facial coverings would be optional for vaccinated customers beginning on Monday, unless local regulations requireed them. Employees at Starbucks locations in the United States and Canada will still be required to wear masks.

Target, which has 1,909 stores in the United States, said it would no longer require fully vaccinated customers and employees to wear face coverings, except where required by local ordinances. The retailer said that it masks would still be “strongly recommended” for both shoppers and staff members who were not fully vaccinated.

Trader Joe’s, which operates 517 grocery stores across the country, said that customers who were fully vaccinated no longer needed to wear masks in its stores. It will not require proof of vaccination “as we trust our customers to follow C.D.C. guidelines,” a spokeswoman, Kenya Friend-Daniel, said in an email. Masks are still required for store employees.

Walmart said that vaccinated customers were allowed to go maskless starting May 18 in areas that did not have stricter mandates. A spokesman for the company, which operates more than 4,000 Walmart and nearly 600 Sam’s Club stores in the United States, said it expected its customers to abide by the honor system. Employees can also go mask-free by answering “yes” to a vaccination question that is part of a daily health assessment.

Walt Disney World Resort in Florida said that it was no longer requiring visitors to wear masks in most outdoor areas as of this weekend, though masks are still required in indoor locations. Disneyland in California continues to require masks indoors and out because of state mandates. Disney’s chief executive, Bob Chapek, said on an earnings call Thursday that the company had begun to increase capacity and that the C.D.C.’s new guidance “is very big news for us, particularly if anybody’s been in Florida in the middle of summer with a mask on.” About 150 million people visited Disney’s parks in 2019.

Hershey Park in Pennsylvania said it would no longer require masks nor social distancing for fully vaccinated guests. The theme park, which drew 3.4 million visitors in 2019, said it would rely on its guests to “accurately follow the guidelines based on their vaccination status.”

Universal Orlando Resort said masks were no longer required when outdoors but still must be used in “all indoor locations.” Its theme park in California will still require masks both outside and inside because of the state rules.

One of the 40,000 DVD rental kiosks operated by Redbox in the United States.Credit…Stuart Isett for The New York Times

Redbox, the company best known for its DVD-rental kiosks, is going public by merging with a special purpose acquisition company, or SPAC, in a deal that values the company at $693 million, the DealBook newsletter was the first to report.

Redbox’s parent, Outerwall, was acquired by the private equity firm Apollo Global Management in 2016 at a $1.6 billion valuation; it later separated the group’s businesses, which included Redbox, Coinstar and ecoATM. Apollo is rolling over all of its equity in Redbox as part of the deal, which also includes a $50 million investment led by Ophir Asset Management.

Redbox has some 40,000 kiosks across the United States, more than there are McDonald’s and Starbucks combined. Are they needed in the age of Netflix? Redbox gets its DVDs long before many movies arrive on subscription services, said its chief executive, Galen Smith, and its customers are more value-conscious than the typical Netflix streamer. Many are also late adopters to streaming, perhaps because they can’t afford broadband access, Mr. Smith said.

The physical rental business was in decline at the time of Apollo’s acquisition, and revenue from DVDs fell more than a third last year, to around $500 million, as the pandemic held up new releases. As the backlog clears, the company is expecting a rebound. There is a “very long tail for the physical business,” Mr. Smith said.

Redbox is also hoping to convert loyal customers to its own streaming business, which accounted for about 8 percent of its revenue last year. It partners with brands like Showtime and is also creating its own content. Once seen as a threat to the studios, Redbox is now considered an important buyer. “We can create value in helping these studios reach consumers that they otherwise wouldn’t be able to reach through our platform,” Mr. Smith said.

The Internal Revenue Service delayed the tax filing deadline by a month, to May 17.Credit…Susan Walsh/Associated Press

It’s May 17 and it’s Tax Day, the deadline for filing your 2020 taxes. The Internal Revenue Service in March said that Americans who needed it could take extra time to file their taxes. That time has arrived.

The one-month delay from the usual April deadline did not offer as much extra time as the I.R.S. gave people last year, when the filing deadline was pushed to July 15. But the aim was the same: to make it easier for taxpayers to get a handle on their finances — as well as tax changes that took effect this year with the signing of the American Rescue Plan.

Still have questions? Here are some articles that might help.

How the Pandemic Has Changed Your Taxes

New rules for a new reality, from stimulus payments to retirement withdrawals to unemployment insurance, could cut your bill or even generate extra refunds.

The Tax Filing Deadline Was Delayed, but Read the Fine Print

The federal government and most states pushed back the date to May 17, but others have gone their own way. It’s a good idea to double-check deadlines.

The Tax Headaches of Working Remotely

“Each state has its own rules,” one tax expert says. So if you worked in a state other than your usual one in 2020, here are some tips on dealing with the tax season.

For Gig Workers and Business Owners, Taxes Are Even Trickier Now

Filing taxes has never been simple for freelancers and business owners, but the pandemic has made it far more complex.

A Break for Working Families

The government is allowing people who qualify for the earned-income tax credit to use income from either 2020 or 2019, whichever will result in a bigger credit.

Ryanair, the Irish low-cost airline, said it has seen signs that a recovery in air travel and tourism “has already begun.”Credit…Albert Gea/Reuters

U.S. stocks slipped in early trading on Monday and most European equity indexes were lower, reversing some of Friday’s rally.

The S&P 500 fell about 0.2 percent, while the Stoxx Europe 600 dropped 0.1 percent.

The Wall Street benchmark rose on Friday, but the increase was not enough to reverse a decline of 1.4 percent for the week, when faster-than-expected inflation data rattled markets.

Traders are watching inflation data closely because if it shows signs of a substantial and sustained rise central bank policymakers might pull back on monetary stimulus. On Wednesday, the central bank will publish minutes of its April policy meeting.

  • Discovery shares rose 8 percent in early trading after confirming it would merge with AT&T’s media business, including the WarnerMedia assets, to create a new giant company. AT&T shares rose more than 3 percent.

  • The FTSE 100 in Britain fell 0.4 percent even as England entered the next stage of its exit from lockdown. Indoor dining and hotels reopened as well as entertainment venues such as museums and cinemas. But an increase in the number of cases of the coronavirus variant first detected in India has raised concerns about the easing of restrictions.

  • Ryanair shares rose slightly after the airline reported a loss of 815 million euros (or $991 million) in the year through March but said that it expected a “strong recovery” in air travel and tourism in the second half of this fiscal year. “The recent strong increases in weekly bookings since early April suggests that this recovery has already begun,” the earnings release said.

  • Taiwan’s stock index dropped 3 percent as the island battles its worst coronavirus outbreak. Its government imposed tougher restrictions, including closing cinemas and limiting the size of gatherings, and encouraged people not to panic buy essentials.

  • Oil prices rose slightly. The West Texas Intermediate, the U.S. benchmark, rose 0.3 percent to $65.58 a barrel.

  • Bitcoin fell to about $45,000 on Monday morning, though it recovered some of its losses from the weekend after Elon Musk said Tesla hadn’t sold any Bitcoin. The electric carmaker bought $1.5 billion of the cryptocurrency earlier this year but Mr. Musk recently suspended plans to accept Bitcoin for car payments.

The paper’s conclusions suggest that economic programs embraced by President Biden may be useful in raising wages.Credit…Stefani Reynolds for The New York Times

Two economists at the liberal Economic Policy Institute conclude in a new paper that the government is to blame for the fact that pay for middle-income workers has increased only slightly since the 1970s.

“Intentional policy decisions (either of commission or omission) have generated wage suppression,” write Lawrence Mishel and Josh Bivens.

Included among these decisions are policymakers’ willingness to tolerate high unemployment and to let employers fight unions aggressively, trade deals that force workers to compete with low-paid labor abroad and the tacit or explicit blessing of new legal arrangements, like employment contracts that make it harder for workers to seek new jobs.

Dr. Mishel and Dr. Bivens argue that a decades-long loss of leverage largely explains the gap between the pay increases that workers would have received had they benefited fully from rising productivity, and the smaller wage and benefit increases that workers actually received, Noam Scheiber reports for The New York Times.

Drawing on existing measures of the relationship between unemployment and wages, Dr. Mishel and Dr. Bivens estimate that excess unemployment lowered wages by about 10 percent since the 1970s, explaining nearly one-quarter of the gap between wages and productivity growth.

They perform similar calculations for other factors that undermined workers’ bargaining power: the decline of unions; a succession of trade deals with low-wage countries; and increasingly common arrangements like “fissuring,” in which companies outsource work to lower-paying firms, and noncompete clauses in employment contracts, which make it hard for workers to leave for a competitor.

Together, Dr. Mishel and Dr. Bivens conclude, these factors explain more than three-quarters of the gap between the typical worker’s actual increases in compensation and their expected increases, given the productivity gains.

The C.D.C.’s new guidance on masks comes with caveats.Credit…Whitten Sabbatini for The New York Times

Are companies responsible for making sure that every employee without a mask is vaccinated against the coronavirus?

What if unvaccinated employees infect their co-workers — is the company potentially liable? Will companies ask their employees to take Covid-19 tests?

Millions of office workers who have been able to do their job from home during the pandemic are now thinking seriously about returning to work. The prospect raises myriad health safety and workplace protocol questions for employees and companies.

Lauren Hirsch of The New York Times’s DealBook team spoke to lawyers, employers and human resources professionals about some of the questions.

Generally, employers are allowed to require employees to be vaccinated. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued guidance in December stating that vaccine mandates are legal. But this is complicated by proposed legislation in a number of states that would restrict companies’ abilities to set such requirements.

Whether executives are prepared to follow through on the implications of a vaccine mandate is also up for debate.

“If they want to permit employees to remove masks indoors, yes, I believe it does put the burden on the employer to verify,” said Kristin White, a lawyer at Fisher Phillips who specializes in workplace safety regulations.

The White House is also reviewing a new emergency standard on Covid workplace protections from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Labor groups have been pushing for new rules for about a year. OSHA suggests social distancing and masks in the workplace — but a temporary standard would establish requirements. Any new standard now needs to consider the new C.D.C. guidance.

As vaccination numbers rise and the number of Covid-19 cases drop, it’s natural for companies to rethink their workplace plans, said Joseph Allen, who is the director of Harvard’s Healthy Buildings Program and advises companies on Covid-19 strategy.

“What was state-of-the-art last year is not state-of-the-art right now,” he said. “The science has changed, the plans should change.”

Categories
Business

Germany’s transfer to EVs to have an effect on hundreds of staff, new examine says

Germany's move to EVs to affect thousands of workers, new study says

The underbody of an ID.3. On January 29, 2021, work will be carried out on an electric vehicle at a Volkswagen plant in Dresden.

Matthias Rietschel | Image Alliance | Getty Images

The switch to electric vehicles could affect thousands of workers in Germany in the coming years, the Munich-based Ifo Institute announced on Thursday.

The Ifo study, carried out on behalf of the German Association of the Automotive Industry, highlights some of the potential challenges that lie ahead of us when governments try to withdraw diesel and gasoline vehicles in favor of low-emission and zero-emission vehicles.

In a statement released along with the report’s release, the research institution said that an estimated 75,000 production workers in the German automotive sector would be retiring by the middle of this decade.

“However, if internal combustion engine car production declines to the extent required by current emissions regulations by 2025, at least 178,000 employees will be affected by the switch to electric motors,” he added.

That cohort, Ifo explained, would consist of “workers who manufacture groups of products that are directly or indirectly dependent on the internal combustion engine, 137,000 of whom are directly employed in the automotive industry”.

Ifo President Clemens Fuest described the “transition to electromobility” as “a major challenge, especially for automotive suppliers in which medium-sized companies dominate”.

“It is important to keep high-skilled jobs in the remaining production of internal combustion engines and in electric vehicles without slowing down structural change,” he said.

A major transition does indeed seem on the horizon. The federal government wants 7 to 10 million electric vehicles to be registered in the country by the end of this decade. In January, Reuters, citing the German road traffic authority, announced that sales of battery-electric vehicles in 2020 were over 194,000, which is a three-fold increase.

By and large, the EU executive, the European Commission, wants to have at least 30 million zero-emission cars on the road by 2030 as part of its “Strategy for Sustainable and Intelligent Mobility”.

According to the International Energy Agency, around 3 million new electric cars were registered last year, a record amount and an increase of 41% from 2019.

Oliver Falck, Director of the Ifo Center for Industrial Organization and New Technologies, wanted to highlight the systemic change that is already taking place.

“The development of the production figures already shows that completely different parts are required for electric cars than for internal combustion engines,” he said, noting that “this transformation has not yet manifested itself to the same extent in the number of employees.”

“The transformation that can be expected in the number of employees will not be fully cushioned by the retirement of the baby boomers,” he said. “Since companies are already aware of this gap, they have the opportunity to take appropriate measures such as retraining and further training in good time.”

According to Reuters, the Ifo survey “did not take into account the potential creation of new jobs in the manufacture of electric vehicles or in the production of battery cells”.