Categories
Entertainment

‘Tom Stoppard’ Tells of an Monumental Life Spent in Fixed Movement

The way the cricket bat taps a ball and makes it sail an unlikely distance becomes a metaphor for writing in Stoppard’s hands. No living playwright has produced such a beautiful sound so regularly (snaps his tongue to make the noise).

[ Read Charles McGrath’s profile of Hermione Lee. ]

The adjective “Stoppardian” – to use elegant wit while addressing philosophical concerns – was added to the Oxford English Dictionary in 1978. His pieces are trees in which he precariously climbs on every limb. These trees sway. There is electricity in the air, like before a summer thunderstorm.

Stoppard’s best-known pieces are “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are dead”, “The Real Thing”, “Arcadia” and “The Coast of Utopia”. (His most recent work, “Leopoldstadt”, is closed for the time being due to Covid-19.) He co-wrote the script for “Shakespeare in Love” and has written or edited dozens of other scripts. He has written a novel and written a number of screenplays for radio and television.

At 83, he had an enormous life. In the astute and authoritative new biography “Tom Stoppard: A Life”, Hermione Lee wrestles everything aside. Sometimes you can feel that she is chasing a fox through a forest. Stoppard is constantly on the move – he flies back and forth across the Atlantic, takes care of the many revivals of his pieces, keeps the plates moving, agitates on behalf of dissidents, artists and political prisoners in Eastern Europe, gives lectures, accepts prizes, repairs scripts, lavish parties, friendships with Pinter, Vaclav Havel, Steven Spielberg, Mick Jagger and others. It was an enchanted life lived by a bewitching man. Tall, dashing, with big eyes, shaggy hair; for women, Stoppard was a walking stimulus package.

Categories
Politics

Fox Recordsdata Movement to Dismiss Smartmatic’s $2.7 Billion Lawsuit

Fox also argues that Smartmatic should be viewed as a public figure. This argument, which is likely to be disputed by the tech company, means that Smartmatic must meet a high bar to prove it was defamed: it shows that the defendants knew their statements were false, or at least had serious doubts about them.

Smartmatic’s 276-page lawsuit alleges that Mr. Trump’s lawyers used Fox’s platform and its sympathetic anchors to spin conspiracies about the company that damaged its reputation and economic prospects. The lawsuit has been welcomed by those attempting to stem the flow of disinformation from right-wing news agencies, but has also raised questions about the limits of language in a changing media landscape.

Fox’s argument in its motion – that it provides a forum for timely interviews – could encroach on the conceptual heart of Smartmatic’s case, which grouped Fox, its hosts, and their guests as defendants who worked together to spread falsehoods.

The defamation lawsuit cites exchanges about Fox Programs, which Smartmatic said helped spread the false claim that the company owned a competing voting technology company, Dominion Voting System, and served districts in multiple countries disputed states. In fact, Smartmatic was only used by Los Angeles County in the 2020 election.

And Smartmatic provides vivid examples of Fox programs spreading bizarre falsehoods, like a claim by Ms. Powell on Mr Dobbs’ show that a former Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez helped the company develop software that was covering the voices could change. (Mr. Chávez died in 2013 and had nothing to do with Smartmatic.)

In other exchanges cited by Smartmatic, Fox anchors took turns expressing support and astonishment as Mr. Giuliani and Ms. Powell made their claims. In one case, a phrase used by Ms. Powell – “Cyber ​​Pearl Harbor” – was later called up by Mr. Dobbs on his show and on social media.

Fox’s response on Monday included a 14-page appendix titled “Fox ‘Evenhanded Coverage of Smartmatic,” which documented cases by Fox News and Fox Business that the company believes are skeptical of Trump’s claims Teams showed.