Categories
Politics

Biden’s Silence on Abortion Rights at a Key Second Worries Liberals

However, as a presidential candidate, Mr. Biden was far less vocal than many of his rivals in the primary, including Vice President Kamala Harris, who compared an Alabama law effectively prohibiting abortion to “a scene from ‘The Handmaid’s Tale'”.

“If you look at him as a Catholic and his attendance at Mass and the way he looks at life and death and everything else, he is culturally 1,000 percent Catholic,” said Jo Renee Formicola, professor of political science at Seton Hall University, who describes the relationship between investigated by the Catholic Church and American lawmakers. “He’s very, very Catholic, but when it comes to being political he’s a lot more pragmatic than Catholic.”

In office, Mr Biden reversed several Trump administration policies, including removing restrictions on abortion pills, lifting a ban on federally funded medical research using fetal tissue from abortions, and lifting restrictions on funding for U.S. and U.S.A. international groups that offer abortion services or referrals.

Some abortion advocates say these early steps are neglected. In his joint address to Congress, the threat to abortion rights was not mentioned, but only incidentally referred to “protecting the health of women”. Ms. Harris, who was once fairly open on the matter, has made no significant comments since taking office.

“The scale of the crisis calls for stronger leadership,” said Kelley Robinson, executive director of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund. “We want them to be explicit advocates of sexual and reproductive health care and use this bullying pulpit to make sure this is a priority expressed by the highest office in the country.”

Many proponents consider the president’s budget for fiscal year 2022, due to be released on Friday, to be a key indicator of the government’s position. Reproductive rights organizations urge Mr. Biden to keep his promise to remove the Hyde Amendment and other restrictions on federal funds.

His administration has also urged Congress to codify abortion rights that would guarantee reproductive rights nationwide even if the Supreme Court overthrew Roe. However, it has not proposed any specific legislation or outlined a strategy to get such a bill through Congress.

Categories
Business

It’s the Media’s ‘Imply-Too’ Second. Cease Yelling and Go to Human Sources.

Perhaps even worse, Ms. Cooper remarked early on that she’d never heard of Brian Lehrer, the beloved WNYC morning host whose gently probing, public-spirited interviews embody the station’s appeal, and that she didn’t “get” why he was popular. She has since come to the view that “Brian is the soul of the station and, in many ways, the city itself,” a WNYC spokeswoman, Jennifer Houlihan Roussel, said in an email.

In fact, Ms. Cooper’s mission was to jump-start the station’s lagging digital transformation, something she had done with unusual success in San Francisco and that requires a willingness to make enemies. She has ambitious plans to hire 15 to 20 more reporters — but first she had the near-impossible assignment of bringing together a group of traditional radio journalists, used to working for days and occasionally weeks on colorful local features, with the reporters at Gothamist, the scrappy local blog that WNYC bailed out in 2018. Ms. Cooper sought to professionalize Gothamist away from its bloggy and irreverent roots, telling reporters to be less openly hostile to the New York Police Department in their reporting, two reporters said. Ms. Roussel suggested that Ms. Cooper was trying to rein in Gothamist’s habit of adding “an element of editorializing to its coverage that can be interpreted as bias.”

And Ms. Cooper started pushing the radio journalists to pick up their pace and to file stories for the web. That seemed like a reasonable request, but it led to another stumble in early February, when an 18-year veteran of the radio side, Fred Mogul, filed a story with one paragraph printed in a different font. The editor realized it was Associated Press copy; Ms. Cooper promptly fired Mr. Mogul (who declined through his union to be interviewed) for plagiarism without a review of whether he’d ever done it before.

Ms. Cooper declined to speak to me about Mr. Mogul’s termination. But one thing I learned this week about public radio is that no matter what is happening, someone is always recording it. And that was true when Ms. Cooper called a virtual meeting Feb. 5 over Zoom to inform the full newsroom of her decision to fire Mr. Mogul. According to a copy of the recording provided to me by an attendee, Ms. Cooper told the staffers, “It’s totally OK to be sad.” But then several stunned radio reporters questioned the move, explaining that they regularly incorporated A.P. copy into stories on air and had imported the practice to WNYC’s little-read website, crediting The A.P. at the bottom of the story.

“Go through every single one of our articles and fire all of us, because that is exactly what we have all done,” one host, Rebeca Ibarra, told her.

On Feb. 10, more than 60 employees — including Mr. Lehrer — signed a letter asking Ms. Cooper to reconsider and calling the firing a “troubling precedent.”

Categories
Business

A Shadowy however Highly effective Wall St. Agency Has Its Second in Washington

The GameStop saga was a David versus Goliath story, in which little traders competed against large hedge funds, and a cautionary story about what happens when fast-moving Silicon Valley collides with the highly regulated world of Wall Street.

Cast members include one of the most influential – and perhaps the least visible – personalities in the financial world, Chicago billionaire Kenneth C. Griffin.

And when the House Financial Services Committee meets on Thursday to interview key players in the GameStop madness, Mr Griffin will be asked about the two distinct roles his companies played in a two-week trading frenzy that created billions of dollars in wealth and destroyed.

The first company, Citadel, is a hedge fund firm that placed a small bet that GameStop stock would fall. It suffered as stocks rose as millions of small investors started buying up the stock, but not nearly as badly as another hedge fund, Melvin Capital, the Citadel, and some of its employees made a $ 2 billion investment in support of his finances.

The second company, Citadel Securities, is a broker who claims it handles more than a quarter of all stock trading in the United States. When retail investors furiously bought and sold GameStop stock – many of them through trading apps like Robinhood – Citadel did brisk business. It pays Robinhood and other retail brokers to process these orders, and makes money by pocketing tiny price differences between buy and sell orders that add up quickly.

“Citadel is one of the many truly gigantic financial companies that are incredibly important and woven throughout the financial system, but never visible to the public,” said Dennis M. Kelleher, president and CEO of Better Markets, a nonprofit group that supports this additional Financial regulation. “They operate in the shadows and they want to stay in the shadows and they don’t want anyone to pay attention to how they run their business.”

On Thursday, lawmakers will put Mr Griffin in the spotlight. He is – together with the directors of Robinhood and Reddit, the social media site – to testify before the House committee about the GameStop rally. Also on the list of witnesses are Keith Gill, a Reddit user and YouTube poster who made millions on his popular GameStop deal, and Gabe Plotkin, the founder and CEO of Melvin, who was bruised so badly that he became Citadels Help accepted.

In particular, Mr. Griffin has to deal with speculation that he used his companies’ stakes to manipulate the situation for his own benefit. Retail investors, irritated that Robinhood was restricting GameStop trading, suggested Citadel lag behind the boundaries, and put pressure on Robinhood to protect its own bet against the video game dealer – claims that both Citadel and Robinhood have denied to have.

“There’s a huge pachyderm walking around and that’s the crazy theory that we got Robinhood or some other company to impose trade restrictions on GameStop,” Griffin said in an interview on Wednesday. “Never in my life have I seen such a completely absurd theory.”

Representative Maxine Waters, the California Democrat who heads the committee, said the hearing – the first of three she has planned – was an information trip.

“They will tell their story,” she said of Citadel and the other witnesses. “We hope the hearing gives us some facts and a very clear understanding of who did what.”

For Mr. Griffin, who started trading at Harvard in his sophomore year, the answer to such questions depends precisely on which arm of his financial empire officials ask about.

Citadel – the hedge fund – had limited holdings of GameStop and other meme stocks, which have soared over the past month. On January 22, the Friday before GameStop went through the roof, Citadel’s bet against GameStop was limited to just 92 shares, said a person familiar with the company’s position at the time. However, after GameStop shot up, Mr. Griffin – one of the most accomplished operators in the financial world – discovered an opening in beleaguered Melvin.

One of Mr. Griffin’s lieutenants called Mr. Plotkin to show interest in an investment, Mr. Griffin said. At the end of the day, Citadel and Melvin had a handshake. Citadel and some of its executives would buy less than 10 percent of Melvin for $ 2 billion in cash, said a person who was familiar with the details of the transaction and had no authority to disclose confidential details about it. That money, along with $ 750 million from hedge fund Point72, allowed Melvin to weather heavy losses when GameStop – a stock he’d bet on – rose more than 600 percent.

Melvin’s losses were staggering: 53 percent in January. Citadel, which at the time had little risk for Melvin’s loss and a loss on its own GameStop investment, was down 3 percent. (The S&P 500 was down 1.1 percent over the month.)

However, the opportunity that GameStop’s rise offers for Mr. Griffin’s hedge funds has to do with the other role his companies play, particularly Citadel Securities. And here damaged investors smelled a conspiracy.

On the morning of January 28, Robinhood, the Silicon Valley startup that had become a target for small investors, throttled sales of GameStop and a few other stocks. The reasons were not fully explained and had the immediate effect of reversing the rally.

Users were angry – first with Robinhood and then with Citadel.

Some amateur traders, knowing that Citadel had already invested in Melvin and that Citadel Securities ran a huge trading operation of which Robinhood was a customer, jumped online to conspiracy theories. (The agreement, known as “Paying for Order Flow,” allows Robinhood and other app users to trade for free.)

“Little did I know Citadel had its hands in so many pockets !!” One commenter wrote on Reddit’s Wall Street Bets forum on Jan. 31, “Remember, they own some of Melvin’s capital! They tried to manipulate the market against us. “

Mr. Griffin said he and his team paid little attention to the online chatter because they were busy with the huge flood of trades. For example, on January 28, Citadel Securities traded 7.4 billion shares in total – roughly the same amount as the total volume of the exchange on any given day in 2019.

But when Mr. Griffin recognized the reputational risk of the rumor mill, he issued statements from both companies denying any role in Robinhood’s decision to restrict trade.

Citadel Securities had no commercial reason to slow or stop trading because of its business model, Griffin and other company officials said. The company bridges the tiny gap between a buy and sell price for a single stock order as a fee and slower trading that limits Citadel Securities’ ability to make money.

But the anti-Citadel vitriol hasn’t waned even after Robinhood’s chief executive Vlad Tenev presented the reason for the slowdown: The heavy trading of a wildly volatile stock by Robinhood’s users meant a large safety net payment was required to the industry-run clearinghouse who makes the deal.

Thursday’s hearing could provide more details on what was going on in the companies so closely linked to the GameStop rally, but it’s also likely that both parties are showing populist anger against both Robinhood and the Targets short sellers targeting GameStop.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat and member of the Financial Services Committee, said Robinhood’s decision to shut down some business for GameStop in January was “unacceptable.” And Representative Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat on the committee, called the decision “utterly absurd” and accused the app of “blocking the ability to trade to protect hedge funds.”

David McCabe contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Republican Acquittal of Trump Is a Figuring out Second for the Social gathering

During the first trial of Donald J. Trump 13 months ago, the former president ordered his party to be close to total allegiance. His Conservative defenders were passionate and numerous, and Republican votes to condemn him – for pressuring Ukraine to help him smear Joseph R. Biden Jr. – were virtually non-existent.

In his second trial, Mr Trump, who was no longer President, received less savage Republican support. His apologists were more sparse and did not seem enthusiastic. Far fewer Conservatives defended the substance of his actions and instead responded to technical complaints while circumventing the question of his guilt for inciting the January 6 uprising at the Capitol.

And this time around, seven Republican Senators voted with Democrats to condemn Mr Trump – the most bipartisan reprimand ever made in an impeachment trial. Several others, including the minority leader Mitch McConnell, suggested that Mr Trump might deserve prosecution.

Speaking from the Senate after the vote, Mr. McConnell condemned Mr. Trump’s “irresponsible behavior” and blamed him for providing “inspiration for lawlessness and violence”.

Still, just minutes earlier, Mr McConnell had joined the vast majority of Republicans to find Mr Trump not guilty, leaving the chamber way behind the two-thirds majority required to convict the former president.

The vote is a pivotal moment for the party that has shaped Mr Trump into a personality cult that is likely to leave a deep stain on historical record. After the Republicans missed the opportunity to oust him by impeachment, it is not clear when – or how – they could turn their party into something other than a vessel for a half-tired demagogue who was rejected by the majority of voters.

Defeated by President Biden, stripped of his social media megaphone, re-indicted by the House of Representatives, and accused of betraying his oath by a handful of dissenting Republicans, Mr Trump remains the dominant force in right-wing politics. Even offline and off-camera at his Palm Beach estate and with a weak impeachment defense from his Washington legal team, the former president continues to enjoy unmatched admiration from Conservative voters.

In a statement to celebrate the Senate vote on Saturday, Trump said his political movement “has only just begun”.

The determination of so many Republican lawmakers to dismiss the mountain of evidence against Mr Trump – including the revelation that he sided with the rioters in a heated conversation with the minority leader of the House, Kevin McCarthy – reflects how thoroughly the party has become defined by a man, and how far it now appears to be separated from deeper political aspirations and ethical or social principles.

After most Republican lawmakers campaigned for a message of law and order last year, they decided not to apply those standards to a former commander in chief who sided with an organized mob. A party that often announced that Blue Lives Matter refused to punish a politician whose angry supporters had attacked the Capitol Police. A generation’s rhetoric about personal responsibility seemed to fail against the perceived imperative of Mr. Trump’s placement.

Lanhee Chen, a scholar with the Hoover Institution and policy advisor to a number of prominent Republican officials, said the GOP must redefine itself as a ruling party with ambitions beyond the allegiance of a single leader.

“If the conservative movement, if the Republican party, was successful, it was a party of ideas,” said Chen, lamenting that much of the party was still taking a Trump-first approach.

“A lot of Republicans are more focused on talking about him than what’s next,” he said. “And that’s a very dangerous place.”

In recent weeks, the party has been so embroiled in internal conflict and so caught up in its fear of Mr Trump that it has only issued a halting and partial criticism of Mr Biden’s signature initiatives, including his request that Congress spend $ 1.9 trillion aims to combat the coronavirus pandemic and revitalize the economy.

Mr. Trump’s tenure as agent of political chaos is almost certainly not over. The former president and his advisors have already made it clear that they intend to use the 2022 midterm elections as an opportunity to reward allies and take revenge on those who crossed Mr Trump. And hanging over the party is the possibility of another run for the White House in three years.

It remains to be seen how aggressively the party leadership will try to counter it. Mr McConnell has advised staff that he intends to wage a national fight against far-right candidates in 2022 and defend the incumbents targeted by Mr Trump.

By refusing to convict Mr. Trump on Saturday, Mr. McConnell invited skepticism about how willing he might be to wage an open war against Mr. Trump in the campaign.

House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi mocked Mr. McConnell for his ambivalent position after his speech, called his remarks “insincere” and speculated that he had given them in favor of his donors, who dislike Mr. Trump.

The Republican vote on Mr. Trump’s acquittal, she said in a statement, was one of the “most dishonorable acts in our nation’s history.”

Few senior Republicans have gone so far as to say it is time for Mr Trump to lose his lordship status in the party as a whole. Wyoming representative Liz Cheney, the senior Republican in support of impeachment, said in a recent television interview that Mr. Trump “has no role as our party’s future leader.”

Several of the Republican senators who voted for a condemnation on Saturday thundered against Mr Trump after he was acquitted. This was in line with Ms. Cheney’s statement last month in her own voice to indict him.

“By what he did and did not do, President Trump has violated his oath of office to preserve, protect, and defend the United States Constitution,” said Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina, a senior lawmaker supporting Mr. McConnell is close.

But the list of Republicans who voted for the condemnation was in itself a statement of Trump’s political influence over the GOP. Only Senator Lisa Murkowski from Alaska is up for re-election next year and has survived grueling attacks from the right before.

The rest of the group consisted of two retiring lawmakers – Mr. Burr and Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania – and three more who just won new terms in November and won’t be back to the polls until the latter half of the decade become.

More typical of the Republican response was that of Tennessee Senator Bill Hagerty, a Trump loyalist serving his first term. The process, he said on Saturday, was merely “a political achievement” aimed at undermining a “successful” executive director.

In Washington, a quiet majority of Republican officials appear to be embracing the kind of wishful thinking they got during Mr Trump’s first election campaign in 2016 and then through much of his presidency, and insisting that he soon be through his own outrageous behavior being marginalized or lacking the discipline to make himself an enduring political leader.

Some seemed to see the criminal justice system as a means of getting Mr. Trump out of the way. North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis, who voted for the acquittal, said in a statement: “No president is above the law or immune from criminal prosecution, and that includes former President Trump.”

Law enforcement may not be a far-fetched scenario as Mr Trump is under multiple investigations by local authorities in Georgia and New York regarding his political and business ties.

But giving the money seldom paid off for Mr. Trump’s opponents, who repeatedly learned that the only sure way to contain him was to beat him and his Legislative Legislators at the ballot box. That job fell almost entirely to the Democrats, who captured the house in 2018 to control Mr Trump and then evicted him from the White House in November.

Still, North Dakota Senator Kevin Cramer, a longtime ally of Trump who has criticized the former president since the November election, told reporters at the Capitol on Friday that he believed the impeachment process would weaken Mr. Trump, even if it did The Senate chose not to convict him. (Mr. Cramer, who also called the trial “the stupidest week in the Senate”, voted for the acquittal)

“He’s made it pretty difficult to get a lot of support,” said Mr. Cramer of Mr. Trump. “Well, as you can see, there is a support that will never end, but I think that is a shrinking population that is likely to shrink a little after this week.”

An even more categorical prognosis came from Ms. Murkowski.

“I just don’t see how Donald Trump will be re-elected for the presidency,” said Ms. Murkowski.

If that projection seems anchored in hope rather than experience, then there are good reasons for Republicans to choose Mr Trump’s exit from the political arena. He’s extremely unpopular with a majority of voters, and polls consistently show that most Americans wanted to condemn him.

Even in places where Mr Trump has a strong following, there is growing recognition that the party’s loss of the White House and Senate in 2020 and the House two years earlier were not accidental.

In Georgia, the site of some of the party’s worst defeats in the 2020 campaign, Jason Shepherd, a candidate for the presidency of the state party, said he sees the GOP as an examination of the kind of identity crisis that regularly comes with “a loss after you” had a great figure who ran the party, ”compared Mr. Trump’s place in the party with that of Ronald Reagan.

Republicans, Mr Shepherd said, had to find a way to reach out to the voters Mr Trump had brought into their coalition while delivering a message that the GOP was “bigger than Donald Trump”. However, he admitted that the next wave of candidates already saw the former president as a role model.

“The Republicans are trying to position themselves as the next Donald Trump.” he said. “Maybe a kinder and gentler Donald Trump in terms of personality, but someone who takes a left-wing stand and fights for conservative principles that unite Republicans.”

Categories
Politics

In Trump’s Last Chapter, a Failure to Rise to the Covid-19 Second

WASHINGTON — It was a warm summer Wednesday, Election Day was looming and President Trump was even angrier than usual at the relentless focus on the coronavirus pandemic.

“You’re killing me! This whole thing is! We’ve got all the damn cases,” Mr. Trump yelled at Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and senior adviser, during a gathering of top aides in the Oval Office on Aug. 19. “I want to do what Mexico does. They don’t give you a test till you get to the emergency room and you’re vomiting.”

Mexico’s record in fighting the virus was hardly one for the United States to emulate. But the president had long seen testing not as a vital way to track and contain the pandemic but as a mechanism for making him look bad by driving up the number of known cases.

And on that day he was especially furious after being informed by Dr. Francis S. Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, that it would be days before the government could give emergency approval to the use of convalescent plasma as a treatment, something Mr. Trump was eager to promote as a personal victory going into the Republican National Convention the following week.

“They’re Democrats! They’re against me!” he said, convinced that the government’s top doctors and scientists were conspiring to undermine him. “They want to wait!”

Throughout late summer and fall, in the heat of a re-election campaign that he would go on to lose, and in the face of mounting evidence of a surge in infections and deaths far worse than in the spring, Mr. Trump’s management of the crisis — unsteady, unscientific and colored by politics all year — was in effect reduced to a single question: What would it mean for him?

The result, according to interviews with more than two dozen current and former administration officials and others in contact with the White House, was a lose-lose situation. Mr. Trump not only ended up soundly defeated by Joseph R. Biden Jr., but missed his chance to show that he could rise to the moment in the final chapter of his presidency and meet the defining challenge of his tenure.

Efforts by his aides to persuade him to promote mask wearing, among the simplest and most effective ways to curb the spread of the disease, were derailed by his conviction that his political base would rebel against anything that would smack of limiting their personal freedom. Even his own campaign’s polling data to the contrary could not sway him.

His explicit demand for a vaccine by Election Day — a push that came to a head in a contentious Oval Office meeting with top health aides in late September — became a misguided substitute for warning the nation that failure to adhere to social distancing and other mitigation efforts would contribute to a slow-rolling disaster this winter.

His concern? That the man he called “Sleepy Joe” Biden, who was leading him in the polls, would get credit for a vaccine, not him.

The government’s public health experts were all but silenced by the arrival in August of Dr. Scott W. Atlas, the Stanford professor of neuroradiology recruited after appearances on Fox News.

With Dr. Deborah L. Birx, the coordinator of the White House virus task force, losing influence and often on the road, Dr. Atlas became the sole doctor Mr. Trump listened to. His theories, some of which scientists viewed as bordering on the crackpot, were exactly what the president wanted to hear: The virus is overblown, the number of deaths is exaggerated, testing is overrated, lockdowns do more harm than good.

As the gap between politics and science grew, the infighting that Mr. Trump had allowed to plague the administration’s response from the beginning only intensified. Threats of firings worsened the leadership vacuum as key figures undercut each other and distanced themselves from responsibility.

The administration had some positive stories to tell. Mr. Trump’s vaccine development program, Operation Warp Speed, had helped drive the pharmaceutical industry’s remarkably fast progress in developing several promising approaches. By the end of the year, two highly effective vaccines would be approved for emergency use, providing hope for 2021.

The White House rejected any suggestions that the president’s response had fallen short, saying he had worked to provide adequate testing, protective equipment and hospital capacity and that the vaccine development program had succeeded in record time.

“President Trump has led the largest mobilization of the public and private sectors since WWII to defeat Covid-19 and save lives,” said Brian Morgenstern, a White House spokesman.

But Mr. Trump’s unwillingness to put aside his political self-centeredness as Americans died by the thousands each day or to embrace the steps necessary to deal with the crisis remains confounding even to some administration officials. “Making masks a culture war issue was the dumbest thing imaginable,” one former senior adviser said.

His own bout with Covid-19 in early October left him extremely ill and dependent on care and drugs not available to most Americans, including a still-experimental monoclonal antibody treatment, and he saw firsthand how the disease coursed through the White House and some of his close allies.

Yet his instinct was to treat that experience not as a learning moment or an opportunity for empathy, but as a chance to portray himself as a Superman who had vanquished the disease. His own experience to the contrary, he assured a crowd at the White House just a week after his hospitalization, “It’s going to disappear; it is disappearing.”

Weeks after his own recovery, he would still complain about the nation’s preoccupation with the pandemic.

“All you hear is Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid,” Mr. Trump said at one campaign stop, uttering the word 11 times.

In the end he could not escape it.

By late July, new cases were at record highs, defying Mr. Trump’s predictions through the spring that the virus was under control, and deaths were spiking to alarming levels. Herman Cain, a 2012 Republican presidential candidate, died from the coronavirus; the previous month he had attended a Trump rally without a mask.

With the pandemic defining the campaign despite Mr. Trump’s efforts to make it about law and order, Tony Fabrizio, the president’s main pollster, came to the Oval Office for a meeting in the middle of the summer prepared to make a surprising case: that mask wearing was acceptable even among Mr. Trump’s supporters.

Arrayed in front of the Resolute Desk, Mr. Trump’s advisers listened as Mr. Fabrizio presented the numbers. According to his research, some of which was reported by The Washington Post, voters believed the pandemic was bad and getting worse, they were more concerned about getting sick than about the virus’s effects on their personal financial situation, the president’s approval rating on handling the pandemic had hit new lows and a little more than half the country did not think he was taking the situation seriously.

But what set off debate that day was Mr. Fabrizio’s finding that more than 70 percent of voters in the states being targeted by the campaign supported mandatory mask wearing in public, at least indoors, including a majority of Republicans.

Mr. Kushner, who along with Hope Hicks, another top adviser, had been trying for months to convince Mr. Trump that masks could be portrayed as the key to regaining freedom to go safely to a restaurant or a sporting event, called embracing mask-wearing a “no-brainer.”

Mr. Kushner had some reason for optimism. Mr. Trump had agreed to wear one not long before for a visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, after finding one he believed he looked good in: dark blue, with a presidential seal.

But Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff — backed up by other aides including Stephen Miller — said the politics for Mr. Trump would be devastating.

“The base will revolt,” Mr. Meadows said, adding that he was not sure Mr. Trump could legally make it happen in any case.

That was all Mr. Trump needed to hear. “I’m not doing a mask mandate,” he concluded.

Aside from when he was sick, he was rarely seen in a mask again.

The president had other opportunities to show leadership rather than put his political fortunes first.

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

With distribution of a coronavirus vaccine beginning in the U.S., here are answers to some questions you may be wondering about:

    • If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine? While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.
    • When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated? Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.
    • If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask? Yes, but not forever. Here’s why. The coronavirus vaccines are injected deep into the muscles and stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies. This appears to be enough protection to keep the vaccinated person from getting ill. But what’s not clear is whether it’s possible for the virus to bloom in the nose — and be sneezed or breathed out to infect others — even as antibodies elsewhere in the body have mobilized to prevent the vaccinated person from getting sick. The vaccine clinical trials were designed to determine whether vaccinated people are protected from illness — not to find out whether they could still spread the coronavirus. Based on studies of flu vaccine and even patients infected with Covid-19, researchers have reason to be hopeful that vaccinated people won’t spread the virus, but more research is needed. In the meantime, everyone — even vaccinated people — will need to think of themselves as possible silent spreaders and keep wearing a mask. Read more here.
    • Will it hurt? What are the side effects? The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection into your arm won’t feel different than any other vaccine, but the rate of short-lived side effects does appear higher than a flu shot. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. The side effects, which can resemble the symptoms of Covid-19, last about a day and appear more likely after the second dose. Early reports from vaccine trials suggest some people might need to take a day off from work because they feel lousy after receiving the second dose. In the Pfizer study, about half developed fatigue. Other side effects occurred in at least 25 to 33 percent of patients, sometimes more, including headaches, chills and muscle pain. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign that your own immune system is mounting a potent response to the vaccine that will provide long-lasting immunity.
    • Will mRNA vaccines change my genes? No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

After he recovered from his bout with the virus, some of his top aides, including Mr. Kushner and Jason Miller, a senior campaign strategist, thought the illness offered an opportunity to demonstrate the kind of compassion and resolve about the pandemic’s toll that Mr. Trump had so far failed to show.

When Mr. Trump returned from the hospital, his communications aides, with the help of Ivanka Trump, his daughter, urged him to deliver a national address in which he would say: “I had it. It was tough, it kicked my ass, but we’re going to get through it.”

He refused, choosing instead to address a boisterous campaign rally for himself from the balcony of the White House overlooking the South Lawn.

Mr. Trump never came around to the idea that he had a responsibility to be a role model, much less that his leadership role might require him to publicly acknowledge hard truths about the virus — or even to stop insisting that the issue was not a rampaging pandemic but too much testing.

Alex M. Azar II, the health and human services secretary, briefed the president this fall on a Japanese study documenting the effectiveness of face masks, telling him: “We have the proof. They work.” But the president resisted, criticizing Mr. Kushner for pushing them and again blaming too much testing — an area Mr. Kushner had been helping to oversee — for his problems.

“I’m going to lose,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Kushner during debate preparations. “And it’s going to be your fault, because of the testing.”

Mr. Morgenstern, the White House spokesman, said that exchange between the president and Mr. Kushner “never happened.”

Mr. Azar, who was sometimes one of the few people wearing a mask at White House events, privately bemoaned what he called a political, anti-mask culture set by Mr. Trump. At White House Christmas parties, Mr. Azar asked maskless guests to back away from him.

The decision to run the government’s response out of the West Wing was made in the early days of the pandemic. The idea was to break down barriers between disparate agencies, assemble public health expertise and encourage quick and coordinated decision-making.

It did not work out like that, and by fall the consequences were clear.

Mr. Trump had always tolerated if not encouraged clashes among subordinates, a tendency that in this case led only to policy paralysis, confusion about who was in charge and a lack of a clear, consistent message about how to reduce the risks from the pandemic.

Keeping decision-making power close to him was another Trump trait, but in this case it also elevated the myriad choices facing the administration to the presidential level, bogging the process down in infighting, raising the political stakes and encouraging aides to jockey for favor with Mr. Trump.

The result at times was a systemwide failure that extended well beyond the president.

“What we needed was a coordinated response that involved contributions from multiple agencies,” said Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who was commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration for the first two years of the Trump administration.

“Someone needed to pull that all together early,” he said. “It wasn’t the job of the White House, either. This needed to happen closer to the agencies. That didn’t happen on testing, or on a whole lot of other things.”

The relationship between Mr. Azar and Dr. Stephen M. Hahn, the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, grew increasingly tense; by early November, they were communicating only by text and in meetings.

Dr. Birx had lost the clout she enjoyed early on in the crisis and spent much of the summer and fall on the road counseling governors and state health officials.

Mr. Meadows was at odds with almost everyone as he sought to impose the president’s will on scientists and public health professionals. In conversations with top health officials, Mr. Meadows would rail against regulatory “bureaucrats” he thought were more interested in process than outcome.

Some of the doctors on the task force, including Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and Dr. Robert R. Redfield, were reluctant to show up in person at the White House, worried that the disdain there for mask wearing and social distancing would leave them at risk of infection.

Vice President Mike Pence was nominally in charge of the task force but was so cautious about getting crosswise with Mr. Trump as they battled for re-election that, in public at least, he became nearly invisible.

The debates inside the White House increasingly revolved around Dr. Atlas, who had no formal training in infectious diseases but whose views — which Mr. Trump saw him deliver on Fox News — appealed to the president’s belief that the crisis was overblown.

His arrival at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue was itself something of a mystery. Some aides said he was discovered by Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary. Others said John McEntee, the president’s personnel chief, had been Googling for a Trump-friendly doctor who would be loyal.

Marc Short, Mr. Pence’s chief of staff, opposed hiring Dr. Atlas. But once the president and his team brought him in, Mr. Short insisted that Dr. Atlas have a seat at the task force table, hoping to avoid having him become yet another internal — and destructive — critic.

Once inside, Dr. Atlas used the perch of a West Wing office to shape the response. During a meeting in early fall, Dr. Atlas asserted that college students were at no risk from the virus. We should let them go back to school, he said. It’s not a problem.

Dr. Birx exploded. What aspect of the fact that you can be asymptomatic and still spread it do you not understand? she demanded. You might not die, but you can give it to somebody who can die from it. She was livid.

“Your strategy is literally going to cost us lives,” she yelled at Dr. Atlas. She attacked Dr. Atlas’s ideas in daily emails she sent to senior officials. And she was mindful of a pact she had made with Dr. Hahn, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Redfield even before Dr. Atlas came on board: They would stick together if one of them was fired for doing what they considered the right thing.

Health officials often had a hard time finding an audience in the upper reaches of the West Wing. In a mid-November task force meeting, they issued a dire warning to Mr. Meadows about the looming surge in cases set to devastate the country. Mr. Meadows demanded data to back up their claim.

One outcome of the meeting was a Nov. 19 news conference on the virus’s dire threat, the first in many weeks. But while Mr. Pence, who led the briefing, often urged Americans to “do their part” to slow the spread of the virus, he never directly challenged Mr. Trump’s hesitancy on masks and social distancing. At the briefing, he said that “decision making at the local level” was key, continuing a long pattern of the administration seeking to push responsibility to the states.

Mr. Azar had been cut out of key decision-making as early as February, when Mr. Pence took over the task force. Mr. Azar would complain to his associates that Mr. Pence’s staff and task force members went around him to issue orders to his subordinates.

On tenterhooks about his job status, Mr. Azar found an opening that offered a kind of redemption, steering his attention through the summer and fall to Operation Warp Speed, the government’s effort to support rapid development of a vaccine, lavishing praise on Mr. Trump and crediting him for nearly every advance.

Behind the scenes, Mr. Azar portrayed Dr. Hahn to the White House as a flailing manager — a complaint he also voiced about Dr. Redfield. In late September, he told the White House he was willing to fire Dr. Hahn, according to officials familiar with the offer.

For their part, Dr. Hahn, Dr. Redfield, Dr. Birx and other senior health officials saw Mr. Azar as crushing the morale of the agencies he oversaw as he sought to escape blame for a worsening crisis and to strengthen his own image publicly and with the White House.

Health officials on the task force several times took their complaints about Mr. Azar to Mr. Pence’s office, hoping for an intervention.

Caitlin B. Oakley, a spokeswoman for Mr. Azar, said he had “always stood up for balanced, scientific, public health information and insisted that science and data drive the decisions.”

Once eager to visit the White House, Dr. Hahn became disillusioned with what he saw as its efforts to politicize the work of the Food and Drug Administration, and he eventually shied away from task force meetings, fearing his statements there would leak.

If there was a bureaucratic winner in this West Wing cage match, it was Dr. Atlas.

He told Mr. Trump that the right way to think about the virus was how much “excess mortality” there was above what would have been expected without a pandemic.

Mr. Trump seized on the idea, often telling aides that the real number of dead was no more than 10,000 people.

As of Thursday, 342,577 Americans had died from the pandemic.

In an Oval Office meeting with senior health officials on Sept. 24, the president made explicit what he had long implied: He wanted a vaccine before the election, according to three people who witnessed his demand.

Pfizer’s chief executive had been encouraging the belief that the company could deliver initial results by late October. But Mr. Trump’s aides tried in vain to make clear that they could not completely control the timing.

Dr. Fauci and Dr. Hahn reminded West Wing officials that a company’s vaccine trial results were a “black box,” impossible to see until an independent monitoring board revealed them. A vaccine that did not go through the usual, rigorous government approval process would be a “Pyrrhic victory,” Mr. Azar told them. It would be a shot no one would take.

Dr. Moncef Slaoui, the scientific leader of Operation Warp Speed, said the president never asked him to deliver a vaccine on a specific timetable. But he said Mr. Trump sometimes complained in meetings that “it was not going to happen before the election and it will be ‘Sleepy Joe’” who would ultimately get credit.

In late October, science and regulations worked against Mr. Trump’s waning hopes for pre-Election Day good news. At the F.D.A., scientists had refined the standards for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use. And at Pfizer, executives realized that the agency was unlikely to authorize its vaccine on the basis of so few Covid-19 cases among its clinical trial volunteers.

They decided to wait for more data, a delay of up to a week.

When Pfizer announced on Nov. 9 — two days after Mr. Biden clinched his victory — that its vaccine was a stunning success, Mr. Trump was furious. He lashed out at the company, Dr. Hahn and the F.D.A., accusing “deep state regulators” of conspiring with Pfizer to slow approval until after the election.

The president’s frustration with the pace of regulatory action would continue into December, as the F.D.A. went through a time-consuming process of evaluating Pfizer’s data and then that of a second vaccine maker, Moderna.

On Dec. 11, Mr. Meadows exploded during a morning call with Dr. Hahn and Dr. Peter Marks, the agency’s top vaccine regulator. He accused Dr. Hahn of mismanagement and suggested he resign, then slammed down the phone. That night, the F.D.A. authorized the Pfizer vaccine.

In the weeks that followed, Mr. Pence, Mr. Azar, Dr. Fauci and other health officials rolled up their sleeves to be vaccinated for the cameras.

Mr. Trump, who after contracting Covid-19 had declared himself immune, has not announced plans to be vaccinated.

Michael D. Shear, Noah Weiland, Sharon LaFraniere and Mark Mazzetti reported from Washington, and Maggie Haberman from New York. Katie Thomas contributed reporting from Chicago.