Categories
Politics

U.S. Surgeon Common Calls Covid Misinformation ‘Pressing Menace’

President Biden’s surgeon general on Thursday used his first formal advisory to the United States to warn against the dangers of health misinformation, calling it an “urgent threat to public health” and urging all Americans — and specifically tech and social media companies — to do more to curb the spread of falsehoods about Covid-19.

The official warning by Dr. Vivek Murthy is unusual; surgeons general have traditionally used their official “advisories” — short statements that call the American people’s attention to a public health issue and provide recommendations for how it can be addressed — to talk about health matters ranging from tobacco use to opioid addiction, suicide prevention and breastfeeding.

But this new advisory, contained in a 22-page report with footnotes, occurs in a more political context. Fox News hosts like Tucker Carlson and Laura Ingraham, along with their guests, are among those who have been casting doubt on Covid-19 vaccines, which studies show are highly effective at preventing death and hospitalization from the disease.

Health misinformation about social distancing, mask use, treatments and vaccines has been rampant during the coronavirus pandemic. The report is a sign that the Biden administration, faced with a steep decline in vaccination rates, is moving more forcefully to confront it. Fewer than 50 percent of Americans are fully vaccinated, and many top health experts have called for the president to do more to reach people who have yet to be get shots.

While virus numbers remain at some of the lowest levels since the beginning of the pandemic, they are once again slowly rising, fueled by the spread of the more contagious Delta variant; vaccines are effective against the variant. Counties that voted for Mr. Biden average higher vaccination levels than those that voted for Donald Trump. Conservatives tend to decline vaccination far more often than Democrats.

“Health misinformation is a serious threat to public health,” Dr. Murthy said in the report. “It can cause confusion, sow mistrust, harm people’s health, and undermine public health efforts.”

In a statement, he added, “From the tech and social media companies who must do more to address the spread on their platforms, to all of us identifying and avoiding sharing misinformation, tackling this challenge will require an all-of-society approach, but it is critical for the long-term health of our nation.”

But calling out tech and media companies is tricky business, and the White House has danced around the question of whether it would try to regulate companies like Facebook that have become platforms for health disinformation. Asked about this at her Wednesday briefing, the White House press secretary, Jen Psaki, was noncommittal.

“Obviously, decisions to regulate or hold to account any platform would certainly be a policy decision,” she said. “But in the interim, we’re going to continue to call out disinformation and call out where that information travels.”

The report is assiduously apolitical, and does not name any specific purveyors of misinformation. But it comes as some Republican leaders, concerned that the virus is spreading quickly through conservative swaths of the country, are beginning to promote vaccination and speak out against media figures and elected officials who are casting doubt on vaccines.

Health misinformation is not a recent phenomenon — and is not limited to news media. In the 1990s, the report notes, “a poorly designed study” — later retracted — falsely claimed the measles, mumps, rubella vaccine causes autism.

“Even after the retraction, the claim gained some traction and contributed to lower immunization rates over the next twenty years,” the report said.

Dr. Murthy is expected at Thursday’s White House briefing to discuss his report. It cites evidence of the spread of misinformation, including a study by the Kaiser Family Foundation that found, as of late May, that 67 percent of unvaccinated adults had heard at least one Covid-19 vaccine myth and either believed it to be true or were unsure of its truthfulness; and a Science Magazine analysis of millions of social media posts found that false news stories were 70 percent more likely to be shared than true stories.

Another recent study showed that even brief exposure to misinformation made people less likely to want a Covid-19 vaccine, the surgeon general said.

This is Dr. Murthy’s second turn at being surgeon general; he also served under former President Barack Obama. The position, often referred to as the “nation’s doctor,” offers little formal policymaking authority, but derives its strength from the surgeon general’s bully pulpit, and past surgeons general have made powerful impacts on the nation’s health.

Dr. Murthy’s advisory drew immediate plaudits from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, an organization that is particularly concerned about false information suggesting Covid-19 vaccines might be harmful to pregnant women. There is no evidence of that.

Categories
Politics

Putin pushed Biden misinformation to Trump allies throughout election

Russian President Vladimir Putin will chair a meeting with members of the government in Moscow on February 5, 2020.

Aleksey Nikolskyi | Sputnik | Kremlin | Reuters

Russia and its leader, Vladimir Putin, approved intelligence services to promote misinformation about President Joe Biden through the U.S. media and people close to then-President Donald Trump in an effort to increase Trump’s election chances, a U.S. intelligence report said Tuesday.

Specifically, the report said that Putin was “in control of the activities of Adriy Derkach, a Ukrainian lawmaker who played a prominent role in Russia’s electoral influence”.

Derkach, who has ties to Russian intelligence, is known to have met with Rudy Giuliani, Trump’s personal attorney who spent months making discredited allegations against Biden and his son Hunter Biden.

The results are the second “key verdict” in the released National Intelligence Council report on “Foreign Threats to the 2020 US Federal Election”.

That section states: “We evaluate that Russian President Putin authorized and conducted a number of Russian government organizations to influence operations aimed at denigrating President Biden’s candidacy and the Democratic Party to ex-President Trump support to undermine public confidence in the electoral process and exacerbate socio-political divisions in the US. “

“Unlike in 2016, we have not seen any sustained Russian cyber efforts to gain access to the electoral infrastructure. We have great confidence in our assessment. Russian state and electoral representatives, who all serve the interests of the Kremlin, have the US -Influences the public in a consistent manner, “the report said.

“A key element of Moscow’s strategy in this electoral cycle has been the use of officials associated with Russian intelligence to spread narratives of influence – including misleading or unfounded allegations against President Biden – on US media organizations, US officials and prominent US individuals, including some related parties, transferring former President Trump and his administration. “

This is the latest news. Check for updates again.

Categories
Business

Buyers Push Residence Depot and Omnicom to Steer Adverts From Misinformation

Businesses over the past few years have struggled to reach potential customers while making sure their online ads don’t appear in the presence of dubious, suspicious, or potentially harmful content. AARP, mentioned in the NewsGuard report as one of the companies that had served ads on websites that advertised false voting claims, said that despite strict surveillance procedures, some ads had slipped through the cracks.

Capitol Riot Fallout

Updated

Jan. 17, 2021, 10:05 p.m. ET

“We follow strict ad placement protocols, but no system is 100 percent foolproof,” said Martha Boudreau, executive vice president of AARP, in a statement.

An internal AARP review found that “a tiny fraction” of its ads, less than 1/100 of 1 percent, were displayed on NewsGuard-flagged websites, Ms. Boudreau added.

Matt Skibinski, general manager of NewsGuard, said companies should treat websites that post misinformation the same way they should treat websites that promote behavior that is inconsistent with their corporate values ​​or post content they do not wish to be associated with.

“Many brands have someone whose job it is to ensure that ads don’t appear in what they consider unsafe or unsuitable environments. This includes violence, pornography and gambling,” Skibinski said. “We need the industry to see misinformation in this category – to cause harm in the real world.”

NewsGuard reported that Procter & Gamble ads were running on The Gateway Pundit, one of the websites that published misinformation about elections. In an email, Procter & Gamble announced that the website was not being advertised on purpose. Erica Noble, a spokeswoman for Procter & Gamble, said if the company’s ads are displayed on a website that doesn’t meet standards, they’ll be removed quickly.

“These are all standards that were put in place long before the horrific events of January 6, but we know they are now becoming more important again,” she said.

Categories
World News

Afghan Leaders Sideline Spokesmen in an Escalating Misinformation Conflict

KABUL, Afghanistan – After seeing the wounded children in the hospital and learning of the Afghan air strike that took them there and killing nine others their age in northern Afghanistan, Ahmad Jawad Hijri never expected his reaction to land him in jail.

But Mr. Hijri, then the spokesman for the governor of Takhar Province, was arrested, detained for three days, and then released after telling the news media what happened – a standard part of his role that he had played many times. Senior officials in Kabul insisted that only Taliban fighters were killed on strike, not children, and that anyone who said otherwise should be prosecuted.

“I saw the wounded children in the hospital,” said Mr. Hijri. “I didn’t make a mistake.”

The war in Afghanistan has long been one of the competing narratives. However, the government’s response to the October 22 strike in Takhar province signaled a change in tactics by President Ashraf Ghani’s government: an obvious declaration of willingness to suppress and deny information about innocent deaths. It also highlighted the changing political landscape as Qatar peace negotiations continue and the Taliban seek to capitalize on the attention they are attracting on the world stage.

The news that defined the first years of the war, when both sides struggled to win Afghan hearts and minds, has almost stopped. That leaves its main actors – the United States, the Taliban, and the government – all testing different communication strategies to achieve their desired goals.

But with Americans potentially pulling out of the country in the coming months, the Afghan government – inundated with Taliban attacks, falling morale among its security forces, and waves of targeted murders across the country – has only shrunk to portray itself as a bastion of democratic values.

According to experts, the October air strike was a turning point for the Afghan government. Even the right to accountability shifted to outright condemnation of those who violated the government’s bottom line, probably for fear of further losing their public position.

The fallout has only encouraged the Taliban, who wish to prove themselves capable of leading Afghanistan better than current leaders, who are increasingly losing credibility.

The Afghan government is “so afraid of criticism that it is unwilling to admit mistakes or hold itself accountable,” said Patricia Gossman, deputy Asia director for Human Rights Watch. “It’s ultimately self-destructive, but they really want to control information.”

At the beginning of the war, the Afghan government was reluctant to face civilian casualties caused by the coalition or by Afghan forces, often promising to investigate but offering results that were rarely made public. But at least the episodes were recognized and local officials from areas where civilians were wounded or killed were allowed to speak about them freely.

The Taliban have used civil death as a propaganda tool for the entire war, pointing out air strikes and night strikes by the US and NATO as blatant crimes against the Afghan people. But as Western forces reduced their presence and the Afghan forces turned their own weapons against the insurgent group, the resulting air strikes and misdirected artillery fire that wounded and killed innocents became an increasingly powerful propaganda tool, this time directly on the Afghan government.

An example of this was photos of dead civilians and destroyed property posted on Twitter last week by a Taliban spokesman, highlighting them as war crimes committed by the Afghan and US military. Such images are often catalysts for public outcry that goes both ways: the government is accused of failing to protect its people and the Taliban for its unwavering commitment to violence.

When the Taliban expanded their propaganda distribution, the Afghan government intensified official dialogue with the public. Since October, the Ghani government has been silencing provincial spokesmen and district governors and demanding that they stop relaying information to the news media, several Afghan officials from several provinces told the Times, particularly on civilian casualties.

The crackdown has raised concerns among provincial officials that they may lose their jobs or be arrested. A spokesman, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said journalists often had to wait hours or days to hear from provincial governors because their spokesmen were not allowed to respond.

American officials and members of Mr. Ghani’s government attributed the action to a lack of coordination between local and national authorities, saying that provincial spokesmen are forbidden to speak only about security issues.

Sediq Seddiq, the spokesman for Mr Ghani, denied the government attempted to restrict information, saying the Afghan government was “a pioneer in supporting our vibrant media and enforcing access to information laws in the region are unparalleled “.

Ultimately, the Afghan government’s decision to suppress information at the local level means that the Taliban have more room to control the narrative in the districts of the country where they are present, but that Afghan officials have more control over the national narrative said a former US official.

This dynamic took place in southern Afghanistan on Sunday. Local officials in Nimruz province alleged an Afghan air strike there the day before killed at least a dozen civilians, only to learn from the governor that 12 Taliban had been killed and a civilian casualty report was being investigated. On the same day, protesters took the remains of those killed to the provincial capital, saying that women and children were among the dead.

The suppression of information was a boon to the Taliban, an insurgent group that once banned televisions and rarely spoke to reporters. According to experts, the February 29 agreement with the United States on a withdrawal timetable has helped legitimize the group at international level, fueling the Taliban’s public relations apparatus to grow significantly.

Taliban opinions in English are now widely published on the group’s website, Voice of Jihad, and sometimes appear in international news media, including the Op-Ed page of the New York Times. Local Afghan news agencies are posting statements by Taliban spokesmen on social media, similar to Afghan officials. It is a long way from a decade before when Taliban news was often dismissed as a lie.

The Taliban often lie about the death toll in their attacks, denying civilian casualties and sometimes blaming coalition forces for them. The group has declined to play a role in recent targeted killings across the country, despite being directly implicated by the US military and Afghan security officials.

Zabihullah Mujahid, the Taliban’s chief spokesman, said its media strategy focuses on “sharing the truth for the people.” In reality, the group has two options: one supports the peace talks and the other discredits the Afghan government on the battlefield and supports Taliban fighters.

To counter the Taliban’s narrative, the United States has set up a small psychological operations unit called the Information Warfare Task Force-Afghanistan, according to US military officials. The shady outfit was made at the request of Gen. Austin S. Miller, commander of the U.S. Forces in Afghanistan, following the assassination of Gen. Abdul Raziq, the Kandahar police chief, in 2018. After his death in an insider attack, rumors quickly attributed his killing to the Americans.

By combining cyber tools, intercepted communication and social media, the unit acts as an instant antipole to disrupt the news and information channels of the Taliban and terrorist groups in the country.

Mr. Hijri, the former provincial spokesman, still refuses to cover up the civilian victims he saw on October 22nd. A report by the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission backed up its claims on the episode, saying that an Afghan government air strike killed nine children. aged 7 to 13 and wounded more than 14 others. Taliban fighters were also injured.

“I’m in the middle of two stones: one side is the Taliban and the other side is the government,” said Hijri. “Now my fate is not clear.”

Taimoor Shah reported from Kandahar, Afghanistan.

Categories
World News

From Voter Fraud to Vaccine Lies: Misinformation Peddlers Shift Gears

The change has been particularly noticeable in the past six weeks. According to an analysis by Zignal, the November 4th election misinformation peaked with 375,000 mentions on cable TV, social media, print and online news. There were 60,000 mentions by December 3. However, the misinformation about coronaviruses increased steadily during this period, rising from 3,900 mentions on November 8 to 46,100 mentions on December 3.

NewsGuard, a start-up fighting false stories, said that of the 145 websites in its Election Misinformation Tracking Center, a database of websites that post incorrect election information, 60 percent also posted misinformation about the coronavirus pandemic . These include right-wing outlets like Breitbart, Newsmax, and One America News Network, which distributed inaccurate articles about the election and are now publishing misleading articles about the vaccines.

NewsGuard’s assistant health editor John Gregory said the postponement is not to be taken lightly as incorrect information about vaccines is causing harm in practice. In the UK in the early 2000s, he said an unfounded link between the measles vaccine and autism frightened people not to take that vaccine. That led to deaths and serious permanent injuries, he said.

“Misinformation creates fear and uncertainty about the vaccine and can reduce the number of people willing to take it,” said Carl Bergstrom, a University of Washington evolutionary biologist who has followed the pandemic.

Dr. Shira Doron, an epidemiologist at Tufts Medical Center, said the consequences of not taking the Covid-19 vaccines due to misinformation would be catastrophic. The vaccines are “the key to ending the pandemic,” she said. “We won’t get there any other way.”

Ms. Powell did not respond to a request for comment.

To deal with misinformation about vaccines, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other social media sites have expanded their guidelines to review and demean such posts. Facebook and YouTube said they would remove false claims about the vaccines, while Twitter directed people to credible public health sources.

Economy & Economy

Updated

Dec. 16, 2020, 10:29 am ET

In the past few weeks, vaccine truths began to rise as it became clear that coronavirus vaccines would soon be approved and available. Misinformation spreader participated in interviews with health professionals and started twisting them.

Categories
Health

Google search panels deal with misinformation about Covid vaccines

Google logo of the American multinational technology company at Googleplex, the corporate headquarters complex of Google and its parent company Alphabet Inc.

Alex Tai | SOPA pictures | LightRocket | Getty Images

LONDON – Google launched new bulletin boards in search results on Thursday to counter false claims about the coronavirus vaccines.

The internet giant said in a blog post that the feature would first be rolled out in the UK, where people started vaccinating people with the Covid-19 vaccine developed by Pfizer and BioNTech.

The feature will be rolled out in other countries once they start approving vaccines.

Google has been updating its platforms for several months with features that display Covid-related data from governments and health agencies such as the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control to combat misinformation about the virus.

The YouTube video sharing service launched so-called knowledge panels on the virus back in March and is said to have been viewed 400 billion times. YouTube updated its guidelines in October to remove videos that made false claims about coronavirus vaccines.

A screenshot with Google’s new knowledge boards on coronavirus vaccine search results.

Ryan Browne | CNBC

It’s not clear how effective bulletin boards are in preventing internet users from believing misinformation about coronavirus. Fake conspiracy theories about the disease have spread like wildfire across social media platforms this year.

Tackling misinformation about the vaccines will be a mammoth task for tech giants like Google, Facebook and Twitter as governments around the world seek to immunize people against the disease.

Last week, Facebook announced it was removing false claims about Covid vaccines. This is part of his policy on posts that could result in “imminent physical harm”. Twitter has yet to say whether it will ban such posts.

Aside from introducing new features, Google announced on Thursday that it was earmarking $ 1.5 million to fund fact-checking research and create a hub for journalists to give them access to “scientific expertise and research updates.” to facilitate vaccines.