Categories
Business

Lies on Social Media Inflame Israeli-Palestinian Battle

In a 28-second video posted on Twitter this week by a spokesman for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Palestinian militants appeared to be launching rocket attacks on Israelis from densely populated civilian areas in the Gaza Strip.

At least, Ofir Gendelman, Mr. Netanyahu’s spokesman, said the video. But his tweet with the footage, which was shared hundreds of times as the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis escalated, wasn’t from Gaza. It wasn’t even that week.

Instead, the video he shared, which can be found on many YouTube channels and other video hosting sites, was from 2018. According to captions in older versions of the video, militants were shown, the rockets not from Gaza but from Syria or Libya fired from Syria.

The video was just misinformation circulated on Twitter, TikTok, Facebook, WhatsApp and other social media this week about the increasing violence between Israelis and Palestinians when Israeli military forces attacked Gaza early Friday. The false information included videos, photos, and text clips that allegedly came from government officials in the area. Earlier this week, unfounded claims were made that Israeli soldiers had invaded Gaza or that Palestinian mobs were raging through sleepy Israeli suburbs.

According to an analysis by the New York Times, the lies were amplified as they were shared thousands of times on Twitter and Facebook and spread across WhatsApp and Telegram groups with thousands of members. The effects of the misinformation are potentially fatal, disinformation experts said, creating tension between Israelis and Palestinians when suspicions and suspicions were already high.

“Much of this is a rumor and a broken phone, but it’s being shared right now because people are desperate to share information about the developing situation,” said Arieh Kovler, a Jerusalem political analyst and independent researcher who studies misinformation . “What makes it more confusing is that it’s a mix of false claims and real stuff that is being attributed to the wrong place or time.”

Twitter, TikTok, and Facebook, which own Instagram and WhatsApp, didn’t respond to requests for comment. Christina LoNigro, a spokeswoman for WhatsApp, said the company has put limits on how many times people can forward a message in an attempt to contain misinformation.

The Times found several misinformation this week spreading through Israeli and Palestinian neighborhoods and activist WhatsApp groups. One, which appeared as a block of Hebrew text or an audio file, contained a warning that Palestinian mobs were preparing to descend on Israeli citizens.

“Palestinians are coming, parents protect their children,” said the message, which specifically pointed to several suburbs north of Tel Aviv. Thousands of people belonged to one of the Telegram groups where the post was shared. The post then appeared in several WhatsApp groups that had tens to hundreds of members.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict

Updated

May 14, 2021, 5:05 p.m. ET

The Israeli police did not respond to a request for comment. There were no reports of violence in any of the areas named in the message.

Another post earlier this week, written in Arabic and sent to a WhatsApp group of over 200 members, warned that Israeli soldiers would invade Gaza.

“The invasion is coming,” read the text that asked people to pray for their families.

Arabic and Hebrew language news sources also appeared to reinforce some of the misinformation. Several Israeli news outlets recently discussed a video showing a family with a wrapped body going to a funeral to drop the body when a police siren sounded. The video was cited by news organizations as evidence that Palestinian families held false funerals and exaggerated the number of people killed in the conflict.

In fact, the video appeared on YouTube over a year ago and may have featured a Jordanian family holding a fake funeral, according to the title of the original video.

Clips from another video showing religious Jews ripping their clothes as a sign of devotion were also broadcast on Arabic-language news sites this week. The clips were cited as evidence that Jews faked their own injuries during clashes in Jerusalem.

That was wrong, according to The Times analysis, the video was uploaded multiple times to WhatsApp and Facebook earlier this year.

There is a long history of misinformation between Israeli and Palestinian groups, with false allegations and conspiracies increasing in moments of heightened violence in the region.

In recent years, Facebook has removed several Iranian disinformation campaigns in an attempt to fuel tension between Israelis and Palestinians. Twitter also shut down a network of fake accounts in 2019 that was smeared on opponents of Mr. Netanyahu.

The grainy video Mr Gendelman shared on Twitter Wednesday, allegedly showing Palestinian militants launching rocket attacks on Israelis, was removed Thursday after Twitter labeled it “misleading content”. Mr. Gendelman’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Mr Gendelman also appears to have misrepresented the content of other videos. On Tuesday, he posted a video on Twitter instructing three adult men to lie down on the floor with their bodies being arranged by a nearby crowd. Mr Gendelman said the video showed Palestinians staging bodies for a photo opportunity.

Mr Kovler, who traced the video back to its source, said the video was posted on TikTok in March. The accompanying text states that the footage shows people practicing for a bomb drill.

Categories
Politics

DeSantis indicators Florida election regulation whereas shutting out all media however Fox Information

Governor Ron DeSantis speaks out on safety protocols and the impact of the coronavirus pandemic during a panel discussion with theme park leaders on Wednesday, August 26, 2020.

Joe Burbank | Orlando Sentinel | Tribune News Service | Getty Images

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed a comprehensive election draft Thursday containing allegations that he will suppress voter turnout and is already facing a legal challenge.

DeSantis signed the SB 90 bill in a closed event that blocked all reporters and media coverage – except Fox News, who in a live interview applauded the Republican governor for his response to the coronavirus pandemic.

DeSantis said in a press release that the new voting rules are intended to increase voting security. “The Floridians can rest assured that our state will continue to lead the way in electoral integrity,” he said.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

However, civil and electoral groups promptly filed a complaint in federal court alleging the law violated the US Constitution, the Suffrage Act, and the Disabled Americans Act.

The NAACP, Disability Rights Florida, and Common Cause argue that the law imposes onerous identification requirements for postal voting and severely restricts dropboxing, among other things, provisions that negatively affect color voters and people with disabilities.

“I’m not a fan of Dropboxing at all, to be honest, but lawmakers wanted to keep it,” DeSantis said of Fox.

The governor, who signed the bill at a Hilton hotel near Palm Beach Airport, was flanked by supporters who clapped and cheered his responses during the interview.

In the meantime, local outlets reported that they had been banned from the event.

“The news media will not be allowed to participate in the signing of the controversial electoral law by Governor Ron DeSantis,” tweeted Steve Bousquet, columnist for Sun Sentinel in South Florida. “DeSantis spokeswoman Taryn Fenske says signing the bill is exclusive to Fox.”

CBS reporter Jay O’Brien said his outlet and others were also “not allowed into the event”.

DeSantis “signed a bill today that will affect ALL Floridians. And only some viewers were allowed to see it. That’s not normal,” O’Brien tweeted.

The DeSantis office did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on why journalists were not allowed into the signing room.

Florida is just the latest GOP-led state to push for new voting restrictions. Georgia passed a law in March that drew heavy criticism from Democrats, corporate leaders and sports leagues alike. The Texan legislature is due to vote on its own electoral law on Thursday.

Former President Donald Trump, who remains a de facto GOP leader despite his loss to President Joe Biden, has repeatedly expressed doubts about the integrity of the 2020 election before and after he left office. Trump has spread a number of baseless conspiracy theories about widespread electoral fraud, falsely claiming he beat Biden.

Senior US officials in the Trump administration said the election was safe and no evidence of widespread fraud was found that would undo Biden’s victory.

House Republican Conference Chairwoman Liz Cheney from Wyoming urged her colleagues on Wednesday to reject Trump’s “personality cult”.

“Trump is trying to unravel critical elements of our constitutional structure that make democracy work – confidence in the outcome of elections and the rule of law. No other American president has ever done this,” Cheney wrote in a Washington Post statement.

Growing numbers of House Republicans, as well as Trump and his allies, now say they no longer support Cheney as a leader.

Categories
Business

As Covid Outbreak Rages, India Orders Essential Social Media Posts to Be Taken Down

NEW DELHI – With a devastating second wave of Covid-19 across India and lifesaving oxygen starvation, the Indian government on Sunday ordered Facebook, Instagram and Twitter to remove dozens of social media posts critical of how the pandemic was dealt with are .

The order addressed itself in around 100 places that contained criticism from opposition politicians and called for the resignation of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The government said the posts could cause panic, use images out of context and hinder their response to the pandemic.

For the time being, the companies have complied by making the posts invisible to those using the websites in India. In the past, companies have republished some content after determining that it wasn’t breaking the law.

The shutdown orders come as India’s public health crisis turns into a political spiral, setting the stage for an increasing battle between American social media platforms and Mr Modi’s government over who decides what can be said online.

On Sunday, the country reported more than 349,691 new infections and 2,767 deaths. This was the fourth day in a row that it set a world record in daily infection statistics, though experts warn that the real numbers are likely much higher. The country now accounts for almost half of all new cases worldwide. His health system seems to be fluctuating. Hospitals across the country have been working hard to get enough oxygen for patients.

In New Delhi, the capital, hospitals turned away patients this weekend after running out of oxygen and beds. Last week at least 22 patients were killed in a Nashik city hospital after a leak cut their oxygen supply.

Online photos of corpses on plywood hospital beds and the countless fires of overhauled crematoria have gone viral. Desperate patients and their families have sought help from the government online, appalling an international audience.

On Sunday evening, in one of many solicitations for help on social media, Ajay Koli took to Twitter to find an oxygen bottle for his mother in Delhi, who he said had tested positive 10 days ago. Mr Koli said he lost his father on Saturday. “I don’t want to lose my mother now.”

Mr Modi has been attacked for ignoring expert advice on the risks of easing restrictions after holding large political rallies without regard to social distancing. Some of the content now offline in India has highlighted this contradiction by using garish images to contrast Mr. Modi’s rallies with the flames of the pyre.

In a radio address on Sunday, Mr. Modi tried to contain the fallout. He said the “storm” of infections “rocked” the country.

Updated

April 25, 2021, 1:06 p.m. ET

“To win this fight, we must prioritize experts and scientific advice,” he said.

One of the out of view tweets was posted by Moloy Ghatak, a labor minister in the opposition-ruled state of West Bengal, where Mr Modi’s party hopes to make big wins in the current election. Mr. Ghatak accused Mr. Modi of “mismanagement” and held him directly responsible for the deaths. His tweet included pictures of Mr Modi and his election campaigns alongside those of the cremations and compared him to Nero, the Roman emperor for choosing to hold political meetings and export vaccines during a “health crisis”.

Another tweet from Revanth Reddy, a seated MP, used a hashtag blaming Mr. Modi for the “disaster”. “India records over 2 lakh cases daily,” it says using an Indian numbering unit which means 200,000 cases. “Shortages of vaccines, shortages of drugs, increasing numbers of deaths.”

The new steps towards the confluence of the online language deepen a conflict between American social media platforms and the government of Mr. Modi. The two sides have argued over the past few months over an urge by the Indian government to monitor what is being said online more closely. A policy that, according to critics, serves to silence critics of the government.

“This is a trend that is increasingly being enforced for online media rooms,” said Apar Gupta, executive director of the Internet Freedom Foundation, a digital rights group. He added that the orders were used to “cause censorship” under the guise of making social media companies “more accountable”.

The battle for control of the gruesome images and online anger over a raging public health disaster is only one front in a wider conflict that is unfolding around the world. Governments around the world have tried to contain the power of the biggest tech companies like Twitter and Facebook, whose policies far from their California headquarters have huge political implications. At best, it can be difficult to untangle government efforts to deter misinformation from other motivations, such as tilting the online debate in favor of a political party.

While corporations attempt to adhere to guidelines that they say are based on the principles of free speech, their responses to government power games have been inconsistent and have often been based on business pragmatism. In Myanmar, Facebook cut ties with military-linked accounts because of violence against demonstrators. In China, Facebook is doing brisk business with government-sponsored media groups that have been busy denying the widespread internment of ethnic minorities that the US has labeled genocide.

In India, businesses are faced with a tough choice: obey laws and risk repressing political debates, or ignore them and face harsh sentences, including jail sentences for local employees, in a potentially huge growth market.

Disputes over online language in India are becoming more common. The Indian government, controlled by Mr. Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, has become increasingly aggressive in suppressing dissent. She has arrested activists and journalists and pressured media organizations to stick to her line. It cut off mobile internet access in crisis areas. A number of apps from Chinese companies were blocked following a stalemate with China.

In February, Twitter relented to government threats to arrest its employees and suspended 500 accounts after the government accused them of making inflammatory remarks about Mr. Modi. However, Twitter declined to remove a number of journalists ‘and politicians’ accounts, pointing out that the order to ban them appeared to be inconsistent with Indian law.

In a statement on Sunday, the Indian government said the posts it targeted were “spreading false or misleading information” and “panic over the Covid-19 situation in India through the use of unrelated, ancient and out of context images or images “. It pointed to photos in several posts that were alleged to be of bodies unrelated to the recent outbreak.

In a statement sent via email, Twitter said that if content is “found to be illegal in a particular jurisdiction but doesn’t violate Twitter’s rules, we may only deny access to the content in India,” adding that in this case users would be notified. Facebook did not immediately respond to an email request for comment.

The moves did little to quell a wider chorus of online anger.

“If most citizens do everything they can to organize hospital beds, oxygen and logistics support for loved ones, what exactly is the Indian government doing?” wrote Mahua Moitra, a politician and MP from West Bengal.

Aftab Alam, professor at the University of Delhi, was more direct.

“Because you know it’s easier to remove tweets than to ensure oxygen supply,” he wrote on Twitter.

Categories
Business

English Soccer Proclaims Social Media Boycott to Protest On-line Abuse

English football officials said Saturday they would hold a social media blackout this coming weekend to protest “the ongoing and ongoing discriminatory abuse that players and many others have received online related to football”.

The boycott is supported by a coalition of groups including the Premier League, the richest and most famous football league in the world, but also the English Football Association. the two best professional levels in men’s and women’s football; Referee; the country’s players’ union and others.

The action is the most direct effort by a sport to date to pressure social media companies like Twitter, Instagram and Facebook to take action against online abuse. It follows a season in which players, clubs, team leaders, referees, commentators and others are active and was the target of abuse.

The social media boycott also follows a week of anger and street protests against top clubs and their owners who tried – and failed – to create a breakaway European Super League that would have sealed them off from many structures, including the pay system Sustaining football for a century. At each of the protests there were vitriolic demands on the owners of teams to sell.

Cases of harassment have been well documented online. In February, Arsenal striker Eddie Nketiah posted a picture on Twitter entitled “Work with a Smile!”

The tweet was racially abused by a Twitter user who told Nketiah, who is black, to leave the club. Twitter responded by permanently banning the user’s account, Sky Sports reported.

Such harassment was instigated not only by fans but also by the club’s social media accounts. In December, commentator and former soccer player Karen Carney deleted her Twitter account after receiving a wave of online abuse.

After Leeds United beat West Brom 5-0, Carney wondered on Amazon Prime Video Sport whether Leeds would “blow up” at the end of the season. A clip of her comment was shared on the Leeds team’s Twitter account, which dumped a lot of hateful messages for Carney.

Many on Twitter defended her and criticized the team’s social media people, including former Leeds captain Rio Ferdinand, who demanded that the tweet be deleted.

Bethany England, a Chelsea forward, called on the Leeds social media team for “cruel behavior”.

“Cyber ​​bullies an expert and opens her up to mass online abuse for doing her job and speaking out!” England said.

In February, the top executives of the Football Association – the English Football Association – the Premier League and other organizations wrote an open letter to Jack Dorsey, CEO of Twitter and Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, urging those responsible to do so an end to the “level of malicious, offensive abuse” emanating from users on their platforms.

“The reality is that your platforms continue to be havens for abuse,” the football managers wrote. “Your inaction has made the anonymous perpetrators believe that they are unreachable.”

In the past, Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter have taken steps such as: B. the temporary or permanent ban on users, but the problems of online abuse have continued to arise.

In a press release announcing the social media boycott, which will run from Friday afternoon through Monday, English football urged the UK to “put in place tough laws to keep social media companies out for what is on their platforms happens to make you more accountable “.

In the statement, Richard Masters, the Premier League executive director, said the league would continue to urge social media companies to make changes to prevent online abuse.

“Racist behavior of any kind is unacceptable and the appalling abuse that players receive on social media platforms must not continue,” said Masters. “Football is a diverse sport that brings together communities and cultures from all areas. This diversity strengthens competition.”

It’s not the first time football has tried to shed light on racism.

For example, players and coaches in the Premier League and other top leagues have kneeled the whole season before kick-off to support the Black Lives Matter movement – at the suggestion of the league team captains and with the support of league officials.

But some players and even entire teams who are frustrated because there is no concrete progress on racial issues and who feel that the gesture has become more performative than productive have recently stopped participating.

Crystal Palace striker Wilfried Zaha said he had come to view kneeling as “demeaning” and said he would stop and focus his efforts on other areas. Brentford, a team in England’s second division championship, stopped kneeling before the games in February. While the players said in a statement that they still support the anti-racism effort, they said, “We believe we can use our time and energy to promote racial equality in other ways.”

The social media blackout will take place while a slew of games are played across multiple leagues, including one between Manchester United and Liverpool, the defending champions of the Premier League.

Edleen John, director of international relations at the football association, said English football will not stop pushing for change after next weekend.

“It is simply unacceptable that people throughout English football and society should continue to be exposed to discriminatory abuse online on a daily basis with no real consequences for the perpetrators,” said John. “Social media companies must be held accountable if they continue to fail to fulfill their moral and social responsibilities to solve this endemic problem.”

Categories
Business

Social Media Etiquette Evaluation – The New York Occasions

Also, keep in mind that any message you share with close family members, too, will expand to your entire online community. (The tension can also be heightened by vaccines, health measures, and the stress of an abnormal year.) Answering your sister about something online doesn’t mean you can talk to her as harshly as you can in private. Ms. Gottsman advises taking a heated family discussion offline.

“Don’t start a family feud on social media,” said Ms. Gottsman. “It can have an impact on the next family vacation.”

Updated

April 10, 2021, 7:53 p.m. ET

When soliciting donations for a specific cause or charity, or asking for money to pay the rent or medical bills of someone with a GoFundMe campaign, be aware that many people’s financial situation has changed over the past few years The year has changed and there may be many other times past compared to many other objections. Skip shameful sentences like “How can you not help this person?” Instead, as Ms. Gottsman said, use things like “If your heart moves you, I share it.”

Do you think less vigilance is required because your text group is small or your settings have been changed to private? Think again When Heidi Cruz, the wife of Texas Senator Ted Cruz, shared her family’s plans to flee to Mexico on vacation from a devastating Texas winter storm, she only texted a small group of neighbors and friends. Screenshots of the news ended up with journalists. Elaine Swann, etiquette expert and founder of the School of Protocol in Carlsbad, California, points out that not just one person shared the chat with the New York Times. There were others who agreed.

“Even if you think it’s just your inner circle, there is always someone who is not 100 percent on your team,” she said. “That’s the person who takes the screenshot before you delete everything that is.”

Posting about food and fitness can be even more enticing than usual as many people have changed what they eat and how much they exercise during the pandemic. But limit your comment to how these lifestyle changes make you feel, not how they make you look. Among other things, not all people had the luxury of having more time to exercise during the pandemic – or if they had, they may not have had the energy to do so.

Dr. Lindsay Kite is the founder of Beauty Redefined, a non-profit organization that promotes body image resilience, and the author of “More Than a Body”. She noted that your “before” photo – which talks about how fat you look – may be someone else’s “after”.

Categories
Business

Unions at The Ringer and Gimlet Media announce their first contracts.

Unions representing employees of two well-known podcasting companies owned by Spotify, the audio streaming giant, announced on Wednesday that they had ratified their first employment contracts.

The larger of the two unions, with 65 employees, is at The Ringer, a sports and pop culture website with a podcasting network. The second union of the podcast production company Gimlet Media employs almost 50 people. The two groups were among the first in the podcasting industry to unionise, and both are represented by the Writers Guild of America, East.

Lowell Peterson, the guild’s executive director, said the contracts showed that the companies’ writers, producers and editors “add tremendous value to the major platforms they create content for.”

The contracts provide for a minimum base salary of $ 57,000 for union members at The Ringer and $ 73,000 at Gimlet Media, an annual pay increase of at least 2 percent, and severance pay of at least 11 weeks.

The agreements contain provisions that restrict the use of contractors and allow workers to obtain titles appropriate to their seniority.

The two companies will set up diversity committees made up of managers and union members and require that at least half of the candidates seriously considered for union positions open to outsiders come from under-represented groups such as ethnic minorities or people with disabilities come.

Ringer and Gimlet Media have dealt with internal race-related conflicts over the past year. At The Ringer, staff complained about the shortage of black writers and editors after company founder Bill Simmons hosted a podcast in which a colleague personally discussed the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder and praised Mr. Simmons’ commitment to diversity.

At Gimlet, the company recently canceled the last two episodes of a four-part series on racial inequality in food magazine Bon Appétit after employees complained that Gimlet himself suffered from similar problems.

Workers at both companies were unionized in 2019 and contract negotiations were at times controversial. Management refused to establish a top union priority – labor rights created by writers and podcasters that the companies will keep – but the unions ratified the treaties unanimously, according to the Writers’ Guild.

“We started this process with the aim of improving working conditions and remuneration in the company, especially for our worst-paid members,” the Ringer Union said in a statement. “We are very pleased to have achieved this goal with this contract.”

Spotify did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Categories
Business

What the Media Has Realized Since Columbine

Last week, CNN host Brianna Keilar found herself for the second time in less than a week, guiding viewers through the grim ritual of trying and failing to make sense of another mass shooting.

This time there were 10 dead in a grocery store in Boulder, Colorado. Just days earlier, she interviewed a survivor of the rampage at massage parlors in the Atlanta area. In 2019, Ms. Keilar reported on the consecutive shootings in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio. In 2018, she spoke to relatives of students killed in the Parkland, Florida shootings.

Broadcast journalists like Ms. Keilar (40) have now spent most of their reporting career recording an endless, uniquely American horror show: the accidental gun massacre. She was CNN’s first female journalist to arrive on the Virginia Tech campus in 2007. In 1999, she was a freshman watching the network’s coverage of a disaster at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado.

All of this went through Ms. Keilar’s head on Tuesday as she paused on the air after a correspondent report on Rikki Olds, the 25-year-old Boulder supermarket manager who was murdered. “I just wonder, can you count the number of times you’ve told a story like this?” she asked, her voice began. “Did you lose the count?”

“I just had this terrible feeling of déjà vu,” Ms. Keilar said in an interview as she remembered the emotional broadcast that was rife on social media. “If you treat this all the time, it is possible to become deaf. Because it somehow becomes inconspicuous. This thing, which is totally unacceptable and should be extraordinary, goes unnoticed. “

Journalists who have covered multiple mass shootings say these moments are borne by sadness, frustration and, for some, a sense of futility in the face of a somber kind of repetition. There is now a well-developed playbook that network correspondents and newspaper writers, including many New York Times reporters, turn to when traveling to another affected city. Talk to those who knew the victims and the shooter. attend vigils and funerals; Obtain information from the police and the courts. Match the necessary coverage of the attack with the potential that too much attention can be viewed as glorifying the attacker.

“I call it the checklist: the shock, the horror, the outrage,” said Lester Holt, the anchor of “NBC Nightly News”, in an interview. “It’s all so familiar and everyone knows the role to play and the questions to be answered and how these things work. Because, unfortunately, they are very predictable. “

Mr. Holt, who reported on shootings in El Paso; Las Vegas; Newtown, Conn .; Orlando; Santa Fe, Texas; San Bernardino, CA; and Sutherland Springs, Texas – a long but by no means exhaustive list – said it was considering violence this month in Colorado and Georgia amid the country’s slow return to normal after the coronavirus pandemic.

“Shootings,” he said, “are unfortunately part of what normalcy looks like in this country.”

Journalists covering Columbine may not have thought about how routine the event they were covering would become. For his book on the Columbine shooting, Dave Cullen analyzed media coverage and found that in the immediate aftermath of the attack on Littleton, network news broadcasts ran over 40 segments, CNN and Fox News had historically high ratings, and The Times mentioned Columbine on its Front pages for almost two weeks in a row.

In an interview, Mr Cullen said he believed reporters had picked up useful lessons since that first episode. “In 1999 we took everything we heard as the gospel. The assumption came true very quickly, ”he said.

After Columbine, the news organizations were quick to formulate what Mr. Cullen called “myths” about the shooting: The killers were bullied Goth children taking revenge on popular Scots. Much of that narrative came from improper procurement, and Mr Cullen said he saw journalists now being more cautious about drawing premature conclusions about an attacker’s motivations. “We take things with a grain of salt,” he said. “In 1999 there was no salt.”

Reporters have learned to focus more on victims than on perpetrators. It was a shift that was noisy on social media as readers on Twitter begged news organizations to focus more on the people killed in the Atlanta shootings, as well as the rise in crimes against Americans from Asia and not on the presumption of the gunman’s motive.

Mr. Cullen recalled a journalists’ conference in 2005 where he expressed the idea that reporters shouldn’t focus too much on the shooter. “I was practically yelling from the stage,” he said. “Now when I mention the names of a shooter from an older case on TV, I get angry tweets from people. Public expectations have changed. “

Journalists are usually expected to put their feelings aside when gathering uninterested facts about a tragic event. But it is not always possible and Mr Holt said it was important “to report these things as unusual, as abnormal”.

“I think it’s okay to be a little pissed off,” said Holt of NBC Nightly News. “As a journalist, it is not an editorial position to be angry or angry about mass murder, about people spending their day shopping or being knocked down by a stranger. It’s okay to get upset about it. “

Gayle King, the “CBS This Morning” anchor, described an experience of “being kicked in the stomach all over again”.

What to Know About Gun Laws and Shootings in the United States

“We almost know how this story will play out,” she said, referring to a phrase she attributed to Steve Hartman, a CBS colleague: “We will mourn, we will pray, we will repeat.” . ”

“I am concerned that we will become desensitized,” she added. “I don’t want us to be desensitized to it.”

And some reporters have to endure and report it repeatedly in their own communities.

Chris Vanderveen, 47, was there as a young reporter after the Columbine shootings. He was there to cover filming at the Aurora Cinema in 2012. And he had to lead a team of reporters during Monday’s boulder shooting.

“When I was in journalism school I thought I was going to cover other things,” Vanderveen, the director of coverage for KUSA, Denver’s NBC subsidiary, said in an interview.

He remembered painful lessons he and his colleagues had learned from the Columbine shootings. Several reporters covering the event developed close relationships with people in the community, including the victims’ parents. He said that helped them ask an important question: “What can we learn as journalists if we don’t add to the grief?”

After Aurora, KUSA invited family members of victims to the station. You weren’t there for an interview. “No story, nothing,” he said. “Just to help us with our reporting.”

Mr Vanderveen said that through these conversations the station decided not to keep showing the same mug shot of the gunman over and over again. And he said he continued to think about the role the news media played in potentially inspiring future killers. “I worry that there are people who want recognition for a variety of reasons, and then they see this heavy emphasis on a person who keeps showing their picture,” he said.

On Monday, Mr Vanderveen was in a meeting about an investigation story when news came from a producer that there had been gunfire at a grocery store in Boulder. The grim experience set in quickly.

“Every journalist goes through difficult stories,” he said. “We are not alone in this. It is just unfortunate that we have had a number of these in Colorado who, for lack of a better term, have given us training on how to try to deal with these things. But it still gets terrible. “

His reporting team may be one of the few people in the news media covering the aftermath of the massacre, which he knows from experience will be a difficult task. National reporters stayed in the area for months after Columbine. They stayed a few weeks after Aurora, he said. He suspects it will only be a few days before the national news outlets leave Boulder.

“Maybe the country is fed up with them,” he said. “I’m fed up with them. If I never have to report any of those damn things again, I’ll be fine. “

“But nothing changes,” he added. “This drives me crazy. Nothing changes. “

Categories
Business

With media offers full, NFL eyes over $100 million per yr for its knowledge rights

New York Giants wide receiver Sterling Shepard (87) caught a pass in the first half at MetLife Stadium in front of Pittsburgh Steelers strong security Terrell Edmunds (34) and linebacker Devin Bush (55).

Vincent Carchietta | USA TODAY Sports

About 30 minutes after the National Football League announced their new 11-year media rights deal this week, New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft praised commissioner Roger Goodell.

Kraft, the chairman of the league’s media committee, had many reasons to congratulate Goodell. He has just given more than $ 100 billion in media rights fees to NFL team owners. Kraft was so excited that he said working with Goodell on these negotiations was “one of the most enjoyable experiences of my professional career.”

Kraft added, “He regards his position as the steward of the league’s long-term best interest. Coupled with his unique strategic business acumen, we can achieve results like this. We are very happy to have him as ours.” Commissioner. “

Goodell has completed a decade of NFL labor peace and TV deals. Now he will oversee the league’s data rights that fuel sports betting. The NFL could seek over $ 100 million a year for its new data rights agreement, according to people familiar with the situation.

People said the NFL was trying to reconcile its new data rights deal with media contracts. The individuals spoke to CNBC on condition of anonymity for privacy reasons. One respondent said the NFL could charge as much as $ 250 million as its data rights continue to lead U.S. sports betting transports.

The NFL currently has a data agreement with Sports Radar and has a stake in the company since 2015. The terms of this agreement are unknown, but the parties are currently in talks to extend the agreement.

Sportradar is a data and integrity company that collects sports data such as live play-by-play and manages the NFL’s next generation stats using Amazon technology. The company has entered into contracts with sports game companies to provide data that will be used to set betting odds. Sportradar uses the SPAC (Special Purpose Acquisition Company) route to enter the public market.

The company also renewed its contract with the National Basketball Association last October. As part of his previous contract, she paid the NBA about $ 41 million a year. Chicago-based Stats Perform is also one of the best-known data companies.

The NFL did not provide an officer to discuss the matter and Sportradar declined to comment.

With regard to the broader agreement on media rights concluded on Thursday:

In this photo illustration, an Amazon Prime Video logo is displayed on a smartphone.

Mateusz Slodkowski | SOPA pictures | LightRocket via Getty Images

Amazon video ads could increase with NFL

Networks that had the NFL’s Thursday package aren’t going to lose the game entirely, as the two teams playing in the game have the competition on the air and Amazon has to pay the cost of production.

This can get expensive, but Amazon’s video ads will benefit from it. In a statement to customers, Morgan Stanley analysts wrote that Amazon’s video ads are the fastest growing part of the company’s advertising revenue of around $ 20 billion. And now that it’s all football, rates could go up. The tech company only tracks Google and Facebook to get market share for digital advertising.

“The Amazon deal is particularly interesting because it shows the importance of live sports content in the streaming wars,” Bill Wise, CEO of advertising software company Mediaocean, told CNBC via email. “It also shows Amazon’s continued foray into advertising and, with it, its unique ability to close the loop between screens and purchase.”

“For advertisers, the imperative is clear,” added Wise. “You need to think about omnichannel and consistently market your brands across screens to connect with fragmented audiences.”

Disney gains access to Super Bowl money

With Disney back on the rotation to broadcast Super Bowls, it will now be able to take advantage of the most watched U.S. sporting event and money that comes with it.

The 2021 Super Bowl commercials were around $ 5.5 million per ad. For the 2020 game, Fox raised more than $ 400 million from Super Bowl spots. Once it’s time for Disney in 2026, that rate could top $ 7 million per slot. Disney will also have a Super Bowl worth $ 2.7 billion a year in 2030 under its agreement.

The NFL’s Covid-19 Super Bowl in February drew 96.4 million viewers who saw the Tampa Bay Buccaneers defeat the Kansas City Chiefs 31-9. Although NFL attendance has declined, the game remains a draw for marketers.

“Linear television continues to be a major pillar of the branding budget and the Super Bowl offerings are reaching a reach like no other event in the world,” said Wise.

A FOX Sports TV cameraman during the Week 5 NFL game between the Atlanta Falcons and the Carolina Panthers at Mercedes-Benz Stadium on October 11, 2020 in Atlanta, Georgia.

David J. Griffin | Icon Sportswire | Getty Images

Fox was able to see effects after cutting TNF

Had Fox kept Thursday’s package, it could potentially have paid nearly $ 3 billion for NFL rights, counting the $ 660 million per year it currently spends on the TNF package. Advertising data company MediaRadar estimates that Fox’s 2020 NFL games generated around $ 2 billion worth of national advertising, largely from Sunday afternoon games.

“It’s the weakest of the packages,” longtime television manager Neal Pilson said of TNF. “No surprise that none of the networks wanted it, and it’s no surprise that Amazon stood up for it.”

However, unloading NFL rights comes at a cost to Fox. Deleting TNF could impact Fox stations ‘network of distributors and subsidiaries’ retransmission fees in 2024, which may have to pay less on Thursdays without the NFL.

Morgan Stanley said, “We assume that Fox’s existing retransmission agreements will not be affected by the loss of this content. Once these agreements are in place and Fox begins negotiating new distribution agreements with MVPDs and Fox station subsidiaries, the release of TNF cause costs. “

But one of the interesting parts of the new rights deal is that the network’s FoxBet gambling asset will become an official league sportsbook “when and when the NFL approves official sports betting operators for their officially licensed intellectual property,” according to one Fox Sports press release.

This puts Fox in the best position to take advantage of the popular NFL betting as the league continues to explore the sports betting arena and also help network partners. And once the NFL has organized its role in the sports game, Kraft’s praise for Goodell should only increase as more revenue is generated.

“We’re going to find ways we can appeal to fans through legalized sports betting,” said Goodell of media companies’ support for gambling. “But we have retained these rights and will see where these opportunities lie and how we work with our network partners. However, we assume that they will be involved in all of our activities in the future.” . “

Categories
World News

In Afghanistan, Three Ladies Working in Media Are Gunned Down

JALALABAD, Afghanistan – Three women who worked for a local news agency were shot dead in eastern Afghanistan on Tuesday. This adds to the bloody number of Afghan media workers and journalists killed at alarming rates over the past year.

The women were on their way home from work at Enikass radio and television in the busy city of Jalalabad when they were killed in two separate attacks, according to Shokorullah Pasoon, the broadcaster’s publishing director, who barely offered details about the incident that took place.

Islamic State soon assumed responsibility for the attack, according to the SITE Intelligence Group, which oversees the terrorist group’s announcements.

The victims were Mursal Wahidi, 25, Sadia Sadat, 20 and Shahnaz Raofi, 20, who worked in a department that records voice overs for foreign programs, Pasoon said. A fourth woman was wounded in one of the attacks and was taken to hospital, according to a provincial hospital spokesman.

Malalai Maiwand, 26, a television and radio host at Enikass, was shot in the same way in December. The Islamic State subsidiary in the country also took responsibility for this murder.

The Nangarhar police chief initially attributed the attack to the Taliban and said law enforcement officers made an arrest on Tuesday.

The Taliban denied any involvement in the attacks on Tuesday. They were blamed for much of the wave of attacks that began in earnest following the February 2020 peace agreement negotiated between the insurgent group and the United States under former President Donald J. Trump.

The death of women is a dangerous time in Afghanistan as security continues to deteriorate across the country and President Biden considers sticking to the May 1 withdrawal deadline set by his predecessor. Emboldened Taliban either want to win on the battlefield or force the Afghan government to surrender in their ongoing peace talks in Qatar.

Shaharzad Akbar, chairman of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, described the attack as “terrible” on social media on Tuesday. “Afghan women have been attacked and killed too often,” Ms. Akbar said in a tweet.

After the 2001 US invasion, which saw the Taliban and its extremist form of Islamic law banning women from most jobs dismissed, the Afghan media and news networks encouraged a new generation of women despite the endless war around them Afghans and women in particular.

According to a recent report by the United Nations, more than 30 media workers and journalists have been killed in Afghanistan since 2018. According to the UN report, at least six journalists and media workers were killed in such attacks from September 2020 to January this year.

Civilian casualties rose overall after peace negotiations between the government and the Taliban began in September, particularly a wave of targeted killings of judges, prosecutors, civil society activists and journalists.

The recent attacks were “deliberate, deliberate and deliberate crackdown on human rights defenders, journalists and media workers,” the UN report said. “With the clear aim of silencing certain people by killing them while sending a terrifying message to the wider community.”

The New York Times documented the deaths of at least 136 civilians and 168 security personnel in such targeted killings and assassinations in 2020, more than in almost any other year of the war.

The wanton deaths, often in populated areas such as Kabul and other cities, have sparked public outcry for better security among many Afghans, especially among vulnerable people such as journalists and human rights defenders. Government investigations and accountability for the murders have been rare at best.

The Afghan Journalists’ Security Committee said in a statement that “practical and effective steps must be taken to ensure the safety of journalists”.

Although the Taliban rarely takes responsibility for such attacks, the insurgents use them for propaganda purposes, in particular to undermine the Afghan government.

But the Taliban aren’t the only ones taking advantage of the chaos. Afghan and US officials believe that some of the killings last year were carried out by people affiliated with the government or other political parties.

The role of Islamic State in these targeted attacks is also increasing. Although the terrorist group appears militarily trapped in the mountainous east of Afghanistan, it has shifted its strategy from conquering territory on the battlefield to mass-casualty attacks in cities like Kabul and Jalalabad.

In November, the group claimed their fighters were responsible for killing more than 20 people at Kabul University before blowing up the city a few weeks later, killing at least eight people. And in December, the Islamic State took responsibility for the murder of Ms. Maiwand, the journalist at Enikass who had worked there for seven years.

According to her family, Ms. Maiwanda’s mother, an education activist, was killed by unknown armed men about 10 years earlier.

Zabihullah Ghazi reported from Jalalabad and Thomas Gibbons-Neff from Kabul. Najim Rahim and Fatima Faizi reported from Kabul.

Categories
Business

How Media Differs in Protection of Trump Impeachment Trial

On MSNBC, whose prime-time hosts are always critical of Mr. Trump, presenter Chris Hayes on Wednesday praised the prosecution’s use of “really stunning video”. He said it “masterfully” “linked Trump’s words and actions to the violence shattering the seat of American democracy.”

When the property managers presented their case Thursday afternoon, David Schoen, one of Mr. Trump’s attorneys, appeared on Fox News’ America Reports With John Roberts & Sandra Smith. He criticized the presentation as an “entertainment package” and described it as “offensive”.

Chris Wallace, the Fox News Sunday anchor, said on Wednesday as a guest on Martha MacCallum’s Fox News show that the property managers were doing “a very effective job”. The next day on Ms. MacCallum’s show, Hogan Gidley, a former White House deputy press secretary, urged Democrats’ efforts to equate a refusal to condemn Mr. Trump with support for the Jan. 6 rioters – “a filthy political one Trick and dangerous for the future of our country. “

Multiple guests on Fox News blew up the Democrats’ efforts to win a conviction. “Most Republicans found the property managers’ presentation offensive and absurd,” South Carolina Republican Senator Lindsey Graham said on Mr. Hannity’s show on Wednesday.

In his monologue Thursday night, Fox News host Tucker Carlson said he couldn’t understand why Democrats were “so angry” after President Biden won the election. “They are crazy, flowery, irrational, scream and threaten,” he said. “It’s bizarre.”

Across the cable separation, there was a point of agreement: the hosts take on the defense lawyers. Mr Hannity described the legal team’s performance on Tuesday as “a little meandering” before his Fox News colleague Laura Ingraham described it as “terrible”.

On Wednesday, MSNBC’s Ms. Maddow said an attorney for Mr. Trump’s Bruce L. Castor Jr. had delivered an “Art Bart Simpson meets Foghorn Leghorn routine”. On Thursday, she apologized for pointing out cartoon characters, saying it was “inappropriate” only to reiterate that his Senate performance was “disastrous”.

A guest at Newsmax, Brian Darling, a former attorney for Senator Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, presented a testimony of the opening address of both sides. The property managers received a C-Plus. The Trump team received a D.