Categories
Entertainment

Various Dance Corporations Get a Raise From a New Associate: MacKenzie Scott

When the pandemic hit, forcing Dance Theater of Harlem to cancel performances and suspend classes, the company, like many arts organizations, was devastated. It had no safety net: with only very modest financial reserves, it was able to make it through with help from the federal Paycheck Protection Program and the Ford Foundation.

Then, this month, the company unexpectedly got the biggest gift in its 52-year history: a $10 million donation from the philanthropist MacKenzie Scott.

The gift, coming at a moment of such institutional peril, was nothing short of “transformative,” said Anna Glass, Dance Theater’s executive director. It will allow the company to say “We have a future,” Glass said. “We know we can exist 50 years from now.”

Dance Theater of Harlem was one of 286 “historically underfunded and overlooked” organizations around the country that were included in the latest $2.74 billion in donations from Scott, a novelist and the former wife of Jeff Bezos, and her husband, Dan Jewett. This round included arts organizations, and in New York City that meant aid for groups including El Museo del Barrio, the Studio Museum in Harlem and Jazz at Lincoln Center.

But this round of gifts promises to have an especially large impact on New York dance, with generous aid to some of the city’s most diverse companies. Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater got $20 million, which it plans to use to commission new work, perform Ailey’s dances in new productions, train teachers and offer scholarships to its school. Ballet Hispánico received $10 million, the largest gift in its history. And Urban Bush Women received $3 million.

Jawole Willa Jo Zollar — the founder and chief visioning partner of Urban Bush Women — said receiving the $3 million felt a bit like floating on her back in the ocean: She could relax into the waves, supported beyond the breakers. “You lay on your back, and you just float fairly easily, you have that support,” she said. “So because you have that support, you can relax into it a little bit more, and go into deeper thinking, deeper planning.”

Now she will be free to float, and to plan her next move.

“You do brilliant work on two cents of prayer and spit,” Zollar said. “And there’s a certain creativity that comes out of that, of what you have to do, but there’s also a price that is paid.”

She said she hoped to maintain the creativity that comes out of necessity, but to make it sustainable, so dancers don’t burn out. Sustainability, she said, means more than money. It’s also about investing in people — dancers, administrators, artists, educators and the community at large.

Like several other arts executives, Eduardo Vilaro, the artistic director and chief executive officer of Ballet Hispánico, said the Scott donation would help his organization move toward financial stability — and that, in turn, would help it take more risks in its art.

“This gift is the largest single gift the organization has ever received in its 50-year history, which is quite a remarkable thing to say for an organization of color that’s been doing such service in lifting the narratives of communities of color,” Vilaro said. “It cements our mission and legacy for years to come, because it’s going to ensure the health and future of our organization.”

The single donation amounts to what Ballet Hispánico typically aims to raise in five years. Now the company, like the others receiving funds, is in planning mode, consulting with its board about how best to use it.

But Vilaro said he thought at least some would go to bolstering the company’s endowment fund, and some would go toward scholarships for Latino students.

In the philanthropic world, gifts often come with strings attached: money that is earmarked for specific uses or specific programs. That wasn’t the case this time around.

“There are no hoops to go through,” Vilaro said. “There’s this kind of trust. And organizations of color have dealt — people of color have dealt with trust issues for so long, so this is kind of like, ‘We see you, we know what you’re doing. We trust that you know what to do with this.’”

In a Medium post titled “Seeding by Ceding,” Scott wrote about “amplifying gifts by yielding control.” After a rigorous process of research and analysis, she trusted each team to best know how to put the money to good use.

“These are people who have spent years successfully advancing humanitarian aims, often without knowing whether there will be any money in their bank accounts in two months,” she wrote in the post. “What do we think they might do with more cash on hand than they expected? Buy needed supplies. Find new creative ways to help. Hire a few extra team members they know they can pay for the next five years. Buy chairs for them. Stop having to work every weekend. Get some sleep.”

Officials at Dance Theater of Harlem saw Scott’s approach to philanthropy as radical.

“We live in a space, called ballet, that historically had been exclusionary,” Glass said. “And so we do identify as an institution of color. We do identify with our community, Harlem. And I think the statement that MacKenzie Scott is making is that institutions like ours have historically been under-resourced.”

Studies have shown that nonprofit groups led by Black and Latino directors get less philanthropic funding on average than their peers with white leaders.

For Dance Theater of Harlem — which was created in 1969 by Arthur Mitchell, the first Black principal dancer with New York City Ballet, and Karel Shook, partly in response to the assassination of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. — the Scott gift will help the organization achieve financial stability. (Keeping it going has been a struggle at times: in 2004 the company was forced to go on an eight-year hiatus because of its debts, but it mounted a comeback.)

“Dance Theater of Harlem is a 52-year-old organization,” Glass said, “and I think for the first time in this organization’s 52-year history, I think we actually see a pathway forward, to longevity and to stability.”

Categories
Business

MacKenzie Scott Proclaims $4.2 Billion Extra in Charitable Giving

In her brief career as one of the world’s foremost philanthropists, MacKenzie Scott has made a name for herself for the sheer volume and speed of her donations, donating nearly $ 6 billion in her fortune this year alone.

Ms. Scott, a writer who was once married to Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos, announced in a Medium post Tuesday that she’d given nearly $ 4.2 billion to 384 organizations over the past four months have. Many of the groups are focused on basic needs for millions of people during a difficult year, including food banks and meals on wheels.

“This pandemic has been a wrecking ball in the lives of Americans who have already struggled,” Ms. Scott wrote. “Economic losses and health consequences were worse for women, people of color and people living in poverty alike. Meanwhile, it has significantly increased the wealth of the billionaires. “

Mainstays like NAACP, Easterseals, Goodwill and United Way were on the list. This also applies to more than 100 separate YMCA and YWCA organizations across the country which, like many nonprofits, have lost tremendous revenue even though the demand for their services has increased.

And smaller organizations like a nonprofit affordable home lender in Minnesota and a group helping people pay off medical debts also received funding.

Ms. Scott’s post did not include the amounts paid to each organization, but it did say that the full amount pledged is prepaid and unrestricted or “no commitment” as she put it.

Morgan State University, a historically black university in Baltimore, announced it had received $ 40 million, the largest private gift in the institution’s history. Ms. Scott said the money went to groups in all 50 states, Washington and Puerto Rico.

Chuck Collins, director of the Charity Reform Initiative at the Institute for Policy Studies, said he couldn’t think of anyone who gave away more this year, at least in terms of publicly announced grants. “She’s responding to the current moment with urgency,” said Mr. Collins.

“They think of all of these tech achievements, they are the big disruptors, but it disrupts the norms surrounding billionaire philanthropy by moving fast and not creating a private foundation for their great-grandchildren to give away the money,” added Collins.

The Institute for Political Studies has pushed for legislation that will double the amount of money foundations will have to pay from 5 percent a year to 10 percent for the next three years to meet the yawning needs caused by the pandemic.

For context, the Gates Foundation, in many ways the largest and most influential nonprofit in the world, raised $ 5.1 billion in direct grants with the fortunes of both Microsoft founder Bill Gates and investor Warren E. Buffett. Dollars awarded in 2019. However, the Gates Foundation has decades of experience and more than 1,600 employees, while Ms. Scott only referred to a team of advisors to help her find good causes.

While the Gates Foundation may donate more than $ 5.9 billion through its Covid-19 response, the number shows how quickly Ms. Scott has risen to become the number one donor worldwide.

In July, Ms. Scott announced that she had donated $ 1.7 billion to historically black colleges and universities, as well as groups promoting women’s rights, LGBTQ equality and the fight against climate change, among others. Howard University said at the time it had received $ 40 million, a donation it described as “transformative”.

When Ms. Scott and Mr. Bezos were divorced last year, Ms. Scott received 4 percent of Amazon’s outstanding shares, or 19.7 million shares. They were valued at around $ 38.3 billion at the time. Those stocks would be valued at approximately $ 62 billion today after a pandemic-triggered surge in Amazon stocks. It’s not clear how many stocks she sold.