Categories
Politics

Blinken Says American Diplomats Have Left Kabul

WASHINGTON — American diplomats have left Afghanistan, and the U.S. Embassy in Kabul will remain closed, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken said on Monday, after the military announced that it had completed its withdrawal from the country.

The disintegration of diplomacy was a stunning turnabout from plans to stay and help Afghanistan transition from 20 years of war and to work toward peace, however tenuous, with a government that would share power with the Taliban. This month, Mr. Blinken had pledged that the United States would remain “deeply engaged” in Afghanistan long after the military left.

But with the Taliban firmly in control, what was one of the largest U.S. diplomatic missions in the world will for now be greatly scaled back, based in Doha, the Qatari capital, and focused largely on processing visas for refugees and other immigrants.

“Given the uncertain security environment and political situation in Afghanistan, it was the prudent step to take,” Mr. Blinken said in remarks at the State Department.

He sought to portray the departure as a “new chapter of America’s engagement with Afghanistan.”

“It’s one in which we will lead with our diplomacy,” Mr. Blinken said, commending the U.S. diplomats, troops and other personnel who had worked at the embassy, which just last month had employed around 4,000 people — including 1,400 Americans.

Left uncertain was whether American efforts to stabilize the Afghan government would continue — the main thrust of years of painstaking work and negotiations with leaders in Kabul that were supported by billions of dollars in American taxpayer funding.

Instead, Mr. Blinken said that any engagement with the Taliban — a longtime U.S. enemy that seized power when President Ashraf Ghani fled Afghanistan on Aug. 15 — “will be driven by one thing only: our vital national interests.”

Exactly four weeks earlier, on Aug. 2, Mr. Blinken had left little doubt that the Biden administration intended to keep the U.S. Embassy in Kabul open.

“Our partnership with the people of Afghanistan will endure long after our service members have departed,” he said then. “We will keep engaging intensely in diplomacy to advance negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban with the goal of a political solution, which we believe is the only path to lasting peace.”

As many as 200 American citizens, and tens of thousands of Afghans, were left behind in a two-week military airlift that Mr. Blinken called one of the largest evacuation efforts in U.S. history. He demanded that the Taliban keep its word and allow them to leave safely once they had exit documents in hand.

Understand the Taliban Takeover in Afghanistan

Card 1 of 5

Who are the Taliban? The Taliban arose in 1994 amid the turmoil that came after the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan in 1989. They used brutal public punishments, including floggings, amputations and mass executions, to enforce their rules. Here’s more on their origin story and their record as rulers.

Who are the Taliban leaders? These are the top leaders of the Taliban, men who have spent years on the run, in hiding, in jail and dodging American drones. Little is known about them or how they plan to govern, including whether they will be as tolerant as they claim to be.

What happens to the women of Afghanistan? The last time the Taliban were in power, they barred women and girls from taking most jobs or going to school. Afghan women have made many gains since the Taliban were toppled, but now they fear that ground may be lost. Taliban officials are trying to reassure women that things will be different, but there are signs that, at least in some areas, they have begun to reimpose the old order.

More than 123,000 people were evacuated from Kabul in recent weeks, including about 6,000 Americans.

Mr. Blinken also said that the United States would closely watch the Taliban’s efforts to stanch terrorism in Afghanistan, as the group has said it will do, and would continue to work with the international community to provide humanitarian aid to millions of Afghans who need food, medicine and health care after decades of war and political instability.

He struck a resolute tone about the diplomatic retreat, and in reminding Americans about the cost of the conflict.

America’s longest war, with its casualties and the resources that were sunk into it over the past 20 years, “demands reflection,” Mr. Blinken said.

“We must learn its lessons, and allow those lessons to shape how we think about fundamental questions of national security and foreign policy,” he said. “We owe that to future diplomats, policymakers, military leaders, service members. We owe that to the American people.”

Categories
World News

Ida now a tropical storm as greater than 1 million Louisiana utility clients are left with out energy

Hurricane Ida hit land in Louisiana on Sunday as a Category 4 storm at wind speeds of 250 mph, one of the strongest storms to hit the region since Hurricane Katrina, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said.

The Karnofsky Shop suffers severe damage after Hurricane Ida hit New Orleans with strong winds in Louisiana on August 30, 2021.

Devika Krishna Kumar | Reuters

Ida has since been downgraded to a tropical storm and is expected to move further inland across southeast Louisiana and southwest Mississippi this morning, the National Hurricane Center said. The maximum sustained winds have decreased to almost 60 mph (95 km / h) with higher gusts.

Late Sunday, President Joe Biden approved a major disaster statement for Louisiana, freeing up federal funds for recovery efforts.

New Orleans Police Detective Alexander Reiter looks at the rubble of a building that collapsed during Hurricane Ida in New Orleans on Monday, August 30, 2021.

Gerald Herbert | AP

The storm is expected to subside over the next day or so, and the NHC said Ida is expected to turn into a tropical depression by tonight. The NHC warned that a life-threatening storm surge is expected in Grand Isle, Louisiana, up to the Alabama-Florida border, including Lake Pontchartrain, Lake Maurepas and metropolitan New Orleans.

The NHC said winds are likely to damage trees and cause power outages as Ida continues inland across southeast Louisiana. Heavy rains are expected in southeast Louisiana, the Mississippi coast and southwest Alabama through Monday and could trigger “significant to life-threatening floods and urban floods.”

According to PowerOutage.us, more than 1 million utility customers in Louisiana were without power as of early Monday. On Sunday evening, New Orleans said the entire city had lost power after “catastrophic transmission damage”.

Ida landed on the anniversary of Katrina, the dangerous Category 3 storm that devastated Louisiana and Mississippi 16 years ago, killing more than 1,800 people and causing $ 125 billion in damage.

Ida’s strength and path will be a major test of flood control from New Orleans to Katrina, including levees, flood walls, and gates built to protect against storms. Katrina had broken levees and caused catastrophic flooding in New Orleans.

Ida has also raised concerns about the city’s hospitals, which are already overwhelmed with Covid-19 patients and have little space for evacuated patients. In Galliano, Louisiana, as the storm raged ashore, the battle for patient care was exacerbated after part of the roof of the Lady of the Sea General Hospital was demolished.

Ida intensified so quickly that officers did not have time to order mandatory evacuations. New Orleans Mayor LaToya Cantrell ordered a mandatory evacuation for a small portion of the city outside the levee system, but said there was no time to enact one for the entire city.

Emergency shelters in Louisiana are operating at reduced capacity due to the pandemic, although state officials are working to secure hotel rooms for evacuees.

All Sunday flights were also canceled due to the approaching storm, New Orleans Airport announced on Saturday.

Water seeps into a beach house when Hurricane Ida hits land in Grand Isle, Louisiana, United States on August 29, 2021 in this still image from a social media video. Christie Angelette on REUTERS THIS PICTURE WAS SUPPLIED BY A THIRD PARTY. MANDATORY CREDIT

Christie Angelette | Christie Angelette on REUTERS

President Joe Biden has declared a state of emergency in Louisiana and Mississippi, a move that empowers the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to coordinate all disaster relief efforts.

“The storm is a life-threatening storm,” said the president on Sunday at a briefing at FEMA headquarters. “The devastation is likely to be immense. Everyone should listen to instructions from local and state officials.”

Cars drive through flood waters along Route 90 as outer bands of Hurricane Ida arrive in Gulfport, Mississippi on Sunday, August 29, 2021.

Steve Helber | AP

Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards called for a presidential statement on Sunday afternoon for a major disaster for Biden after the storm hit the state’s coastline.

“Hurricane Ida is one of the strongest storms to have ever hit Louisiana,” Edwards said in a statement. “Our goal is to help our local authorities and the citizens of the state as quickly as possible.

A resident picks up sandbags home from a city-operated sandbag distribution point on Dryades YMCA along Oretha Castle Haley Blvd., Friday, Aug. 27, 2021 in New Orleans as residents prepare for Hurricane Ida.

Max Becherer | The Times-Picayune | The New Orleans attorney via AP

Harmful winds will spread to southwest Mississippi on Sunday night and early Monday, likely causing widespread tree damage and power outages, as well as heavy rains and expected across the central Gulf Coast, the Hurricane Center said.

As the storm moves inland, the Hurricane Center is forecasting significant flooding in parts of the lower Mississippi, Tennessee Valley, upper Ohio Valley, central Appalachian Mountains and the mid-Atlantic by Wednesday, according to the Hurricane Center.

Ida is the first major storm to hit the Gulf Coast during the 2021 Atlantic hurricane season. The 2020 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active on record, with 30 named storms including 13 hurricanes.

Scientists warn of increasingly dangerous hurricane seasons as climate change fuels more frequent and catastrophic storms. NOAA expects between 15 and 21 named storms, including seven to ten hurricanes, in the 2021 season.

This story evolves. Please check again for updates.

– CNBC’s Melodie Warner and Christine Wang contributed to this report.

Categories
Politics

State Division in touch with the final People left in Afghanistan

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken holds a press conference on Afghanistan at the State Department in Washington, DC on August 25, 2021.

Alex Brandon | Swimming pool | Reuters

WASHINGTON – The State Department said Thursday it is in contact with the 1,000 or so US citizens remaining in Afghanistan and that two-thirds of them are actively trying to leave the country.

Another 500 Americans have been evacuated in the past 24 hours, according to a State Department spokesman who requested anonymity to discuss the still-fluid numbers.

Collectively, this group of 1,500 U.S. citizens makes up the last of the roughly 6,000 Americans Secretary of State Antony Blinken said were in Afghanistan when the massive U.S. airlift began on August 14.

“The US government does not follow the movements of the Americans when they travel around the world,” said Blinken on Wednesday. “There could be other Americans in Afghanistan who have never signed up with the embassy, ​​who have ignored public evacuation instructions, and have not yet identified themselves.”

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

“We have also found that many people who contact us and identify themselves as American citizens, even by completing and submitting repatriation assistance forms, are in fact not US citizens, which may take some time to verify.” “

On Thursday, the State Department said that around 500 more people “pretending to be Americans in Afghanistan who want to leave,” and US diplomats tried to contact them.

But the official said the department was skeptical of some of these last-minute claims:

“In our experience, many of them will not turn out to be US citizens in need of our help,” the official said.

Of the roughly 660 US citizens who have been contacted by the State Department in the past day or two and are actively attempting to leave Afghanistan, “many, if not most, of these people are almost or already out of the country,” the spokesman said.

The US is now also aware of “dozens more” American citizens “who do not want to leave Afghanistan for a number of reasons”.

The latest State Department figures underscore one of the most complex parts of the US withdrawal: the hunt down of every last American civilian in a country that lacks reliable internet and phone services.

American humanitarian workers and Christian missionaries have been active in Afghanistan for 20 years, often working in remote communities far from the big cities.

It was unclear how exactly the State Department tracked these last 1,000 people. Officials also didn’t say what would become of citizens who fail to leave the country before President Joe Biden’s August 31 deadline for military withdrawal.

Efforts to locate and remove individual US citizens became even more dangerous on Thursday when a suicide bombing outside the gates of Kabul airport killed 12 American soldiers and wounded 15 others.

A splinter group of ISIS in Afghanistan, ISIS-K, claimed responsibility for the attacks, in which at least 60 Afghan civilians were killed.

Biden will speak on Thursday at 5:00 p.m. to discuss the terrorist attacks and ongoing evacuation efforts.

Categories
Politics

U.S. working to contact most of 1,500 Americans left

WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Wednesday that there may be as many as 1,500 Americans in Afghanistan left to evacuate, a calculation that he described as “difficult to pin down with absolute precision at any given moment.”

Blinken said during a press conference that the U.S. currently is “aggressively reaching out” to about 1,000 contacts “multiple times a day, through multiple channels of communication” to determine if they still want to leave and to give them instructions on how to do so. However, the ultimate number might be lower, Blinken said.

Blinken added that the State Department has been in direct contact with 500 other Americans in the last 24 hours with instructions on how to safely travel to the airport for evacuation.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks about refugee programs for Afghans who aided the U.S. during a briefing at the State Department in Washington, DC, U.S. August 2, 2021.

Brendan Smialowski | Reuters

“The U.S. government does not track Americans’ movements when they travel around the world,” Blinken explained. “There could be other Americans in Afghanistan who never enrolled with the embassy, who ignored public evacuation notices and have not yet identified themselves.”

“We’ve also found that many people who contact us and identify themselves as American citizens, including by filling out and submitting repatriation assistance forms, are not, in fact, U.S. citizens, something that can take some time to verify. And some Americans may choose to stay in Afghanistan,” the nation’s top diplomat said.

The U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan early on Thursday issued a security alert on its website urging Americans to avoid traveling to Kabul airport and warned some at certain gates to “leave immediately.”

“U.S. citizens who are at the Abbey Gate, East Gate, or North Gate now should leave immediately.” the alert said.

A State Department spokesperson called it a “dynamic and volatile security environment.”

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Wednesday that many of the 1,000 contacts the U.S. is trying to reach are dual citizens who may not want to leave the country.

“Maybe they have extended family there, maybe they’ve spent their entire lives in Afghanistan and they’re not yet ready to depart,” Psaki told reporters during a press briefing. “Maybe they’re working on a range of projects there and aren’t yet ready to leave them. I know that’s hard for us to understand as we’re looking at the images, but for many of these Afghans, this is their home.”

Blinken’s press conference, his first since the collapse of the Afghan government to the Taliban more than a week ago, comes as U.S. and coalition forces intensify emergency evacuation flights.

In the past 24 hours, Western forces evacuated 19,000 people out of Kabul on 90 military cargo aircraft flights, a cadence of one departure flight every 39 minutes, according to the Pentagon.

Evacuees wait to board a Boeing C-17 Globemaster III during an evacuation at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, August 23, 2021.

Sgt. Isaiah Campbell | U.S. Marine Corps | via Reuters

Since the mass evacuations began Aug. 14, approximately 82,300 people have been airlifted out of Afghanistan. About 87,900 people have been evacuated since the end of July, including about 4,500 U.S. citizens and their families.

The Pentagon said Wednesday that 10,000 people are currently at Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul awaiting a flight. About 5,400 U.S. servicemembers are assisting with evacuation efforts, with nearly 200 U.S. military aircraft dedicated to the mission.

President Joe Biden on Tuesday reiterated to leaders of the G-7, NATO, United Nations and European Union that the United States will withdraw its military from Afghanistan by the end of the month.

The president warned that staying longer in Afghanistan carries serious risks for foreign troops and civilians. Biden said that ISIS-K, an Afghanistan-based affiliate of the terror group, presents a growing threat to the airport.

“Every day we’re on the ground is another day we know that ISIS-K is seeking to target the airport and attack both U.S. and allied forces and innocent civilians,” he said.

Read more on the developments in Afghanistan:

The Taliban said earlier Tuesday that the group will no longer allow Afghan nationals to leave the country on evacuation flights nor will they accept an extension of the withdrawal deadline beyond the end of the month.

“We are not in favor of allowing Afghans to leave,” Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid told reporters during a press conference on Tuesday.

“They [the Americans] have the opportunity, they have all the resources, they can take all the people that belong to them, but we are not going to allow Afghans to leave and we will not extend the deadline,” he said. Evacuations carried out by foreign forces after Aug. 31 would be a “violation” of a Biden administration promise to end the U.S. military’s mission in the country, Mujahid said.

Clarification: There may be as many as 1,500 Americans still in Afghanistan awaiting evacuation. The State Department has given 500 of them specific instructions on how to reach Hamid Karzai International Airport safely. The U.S. is still trying to contact the remaining 1,000, though the number who actually want to leave may be lower, according to the State Department.

NBC News contributed to this report.

Categories
World News

Sequence of U.S. Actions Left Afghan Allies Frantic, Stranded and Wanting to Get Out

WASHINGTON – Als Präsident Biden letzten Monat seine Entscheidung verteidigte, die US-Militärpräsenz in Afghanistan zu beenden, gab er den Afghanen, die ihr Leben riskiert hatten, um den amerikanischen Truppen zu helfen, ein Versprechen, das so alt wie der Krieg selbst war.

„Unsere Botschaft an diese Frauen und Männer ist klar: Es gibt ein Zuhause für Sie in den Vereinigten Staaten, wenn Sie dies wünschen“, sagte der Präsident. “Wir werden zu Ihnen stehen, so wie Sie zu uns standen.”

Aber seine Entscheidung, Anfang des Jahres keine Massenevakuierung afghanischer Dolmetscher, Reiseleiter und ihrer Angehörigen zu beginnen, hat Tausende von Menschen in der Schwebe zurückgelassen, die nach 20 Jahren Krieg in einem Land gestrandet sind, das jetzt von den Taliban kontrolliert wird.

Noch bevor Herr Biden den Abzug der US-Truppen ankündigte, lehnte seine Regierung verzweifelte Aufrufe von Gesetzgebern und Aktivisten ab, Afghanen zu evakuieren, die jetzt in Gefahr sind.

Dann in diesem Sommer flehte Afghanistans Präsident Ashraf Ghani Herrn Biden an, Evakuierungen bis zum endgültigen Abzug der US-Streitkräfte auszusetzen, da er befürchtete, dass das Image das Vertrauen in seine Regierung untergraben würde.

Herr Biden unternahm stattdessen Schritte, um ein von Rückständen geplagtes Visasystem zu rationalisieren, obwohl es nie für die Massenüberführung von Menschen in kurzer Zeit gedacht war. Und in den Vereinigten Staaten äußerten einige Beamte Bedenken über einen möglichen politischen Rückschlag wegen eines Flüchtlingszustroms.

Zusammengenommen ließen die Maßnahmen der Regierung das Versprechen von Herrn Biden am vergangenen Wochenende weitgehend unerfüllt und führten zu brennenden Szenen auf dem Flughafen von Kabul, in denen sich Afghanen an die Seiten abfliegender amerikanischer Flugzeuge klammerten. Und sie stellten die Frage, ob eine Regierung, die erklärt hat, den Menschenrechten im Ausland Vorrang einzuräumen, die Afghanen, von denen sie am meisten abhängt, im Stich gelassen hat, was das traditionelle globale Image der Vereinigten Staaten als Zufluchtsort für die Verfolgten trübt.

Der Präsident verteidigte am Mittwoch den Rückzug der USA und sagte, er sehe keinen Weg, Afghanistan zu verlassen, ohne dass „Chaos“ entsteht. In einem Interview mit ABC News wurde er gefragt, ob der Ausstieg besser hätte gehandhabt werden können.

„Nein, ich glaube nicht, dass es so hätte gehandhabt werden können, dass wir im Nachhinein zurückgehen und nachsehen werden – aber die Idee, dass es irgendwie einen Weg gibt, ohne Chaos herauszukommen, tue ich nicht wissen, wie das passiert“, sagte Herr Biden. “Ich weiß nicht, wie das passiert ist.”

Kritiker sagten jedoch, die Regierung sei direkt schuld.

„Das Versäumnis, unsere Verbündeten zu evakuieren, liegt allein in den Händen der Biden-Regierung, die Veteranen und Befürworter ignorierte, selbst wenn sie detaillierte Pläne zur Evakuierung auf US-Territorium vorlegten“, sagte Chris Purdy, der Projektmanager der Veteranen für das American Ideals-Programm bei Human Rights First.

Seit 2002 beschäftigen die Vereinigten Staaten Afghanen, um ihre Truppen, Diplomaten und Helfer zu unterstützen. Viele dieser Menschen wurden aufgrund ihrer Arbeit bedroht, angegriffen oder zur Flucht gezwungen, was den Kongress im Jahr 2009 veranlasste, ein Visumprogramm speziell für diejenigen, die der US-Regierung geholfen hatten, sowie deren unmittelbare Verwandte einzurichten.

Das Programm ist getrennt von dem Prozess, der normalerweise von denen verwendet wird, die vor Verfolgung oder Folter fliehen. Ungefähr 18.000 Menschen sind dabei, die Visa zu beantragen, und diese Antragsteller haben mindestens 53.000 Verwandte, die zu ihnen berechtigt wären. Trotz eines Mandats des Kongresses, dass die Vereinigten Staaten die Visa in neun Monaten bearbeiten, mussten Tausende mit langen Verzögerungen bei der Überprüfung konfrontiert werden.

Die Biden-Regierung hat nach Angaben des Außenministeriums seit Mitte Juli rund 2.000 der Antragsteller auf Militärstützpunkte evakuiert. Es bereitet die Evakuierung weiterer 800 vor.

In einer Reihe von Treffen und Telefonaten seit März, auch bevor Herr Biden den Rückzug der USA ankündigte, warnten Gesetzgeber und Umsiedlungsbeamte das Weiße Haus und das Außenministerium, dass die Situation eine dringende Reaktion erfordert – eine, die mit dem Sondervisum nicht angegangen werden kann Programm, das laut Umsiedlung und ehemaligen Regierungsbeamten, die unter der Bedingung der Anonymität gesprochen haben, zu lange dauerte, um interne Diskussionen zu beschreiben.

Das spezielle Visaprogramm verlangt von den Antragstellern, dass sie umfangreiche Prüfungen bestehen und ihre Arbeit nachweisen – Dokumente, die für Familien, die gezwungen sind, aus ihrer Heimat zu fliehen, schwer zu bekommen sein können. Die Biden-Regierung hat die vorherige Regierung dafür verantwortlich gemacht, die Verzögerungen durch „extreme Überprüfungsanforderungen“ zu verschlimmern.

Die Rufe nach schnellen Evakuierungen wurden laut, als die Biden-Regierung zusätzliches Personal in Washington und in der Botschaft in Kabul entsandte, um die Rückstände zu beseitigen. Ein Beamter sagte, die Verwaltung habe die Bürokratie durchbrochen, indem sie die Bearbeitungsverzögerungen halbiert habe, die sich bei Amtsantritt von Herrn Biden auf durchschnittlich zwei Jahre beliefen, und den Kongress dazu drängte, die Anzahl der Visa zu erhöhen und auf die Anforderungen für ärztliche Untersuchungen zu verzichten.

Doch selbst unter besten Umständen ist die Überprüfung von Flüchtlingen enorm zeitaufwändig. Die Aussicht, dass Tausende von afghanischen Flüchtlingen in die Vereinigten Staaten – und nicht in andere Länder – kommen, löste bei einigen Regierungsbeamten Bedenken aus, die argumentierten, dass dies das Weiße Haus für politische Rückschläge öffnen würde, so Regierungsbeamte und andere mit der Gegenstand.

Aktualisiert

August 18, 2021, 8:17 Uhr ET

Einige Gesetzgeber, wie der Abgeordnete Matt Rosendale, Republikaner von Montana, haben Bedenken hinsichtlich einer Beschleunigung des Überprüfungsprozesses geäußert.

„Wir werden jetzt ein Verfahren entwickeln, mit dem wir Tausende von Personen untersuchen und einfach in die USA umsiedeln können?“ sagte er in einem Interview. „Sobald sie sich hier eingelebt haben, können sie weitere Familienmitglieder hierher bringen. Eine gute Tat macht keinen Verbündeten.“

Afghanen – insbesondere Frauen und Mädchen – zurückzulassen, könnte für Herrn Biden erhebliche politische Auswirkungen haben.

„Der Tag, an dem sie beginnen, Frauen in Afghanistan zu töten: Das ist ihr politischer Albtraum“, sagte Michael A. McFaul, Professor für internationale Studien an der Stanford University und ehemaliger Botschafter in Russland während der Obama-Regierung. „Diese Zahlen, die den Rückzug unterstützen, sind unglaublich weich. Wenn Frauen, die Geld von USAID genommen haben, verhaftet oder getötet werden, wird diese Unterstützung schnell abnehmen und die Menschen werden über den Präsidenten empört sein.“

Flüchtlingsanwälte sagen, dass die Opfer der Afghanen für die Vereinigten Staaten jedes potenzielle politische Risiko überwiegen sollten, das mit Massenumsiedlungen einhergeht.

„Es ist ziemlich reich, wenn man bedenkt, dass wir diesen Leuten genug vertraut haben, um das Leben der US-Streitkräfte in ihre Hände zu legen, sie aber nicht auf US-Boden zu bringen“, sagte Becca Heller, die geschäftsführende Direktorin des International Refugee Assistance Project, das mit der State Department, um den Afghanen zu helfen.

In den Tagen, seit die Taliban die Kontrolle über Afghanistan übernommen haben, hat Herr Biden zusätzliche 500 Millionen US-Dollar für „unerwarteten dringenden Flüchtlings- und Migrationsbedarf von Flüchtlingen, Konfliktopfern und anderen aufgrund der Situation in Afghanistan gefährdeten Personen“ bewilligt.

Die Regierung rief auch in der gesamten Regierung nach Freiwilligen, die bei der Bearbeitung der afghanischen Visa helfen. Eine E-Mail der United States Citizenship and Immigration Services beschrieb die Gelegenheit als „außergewöhnliche Initiative“ und ermutigte jeden Mitarbeiter in jeder Position, sich zu bewerben.

Die Taliban-Übernahme in Afghanistan verstehen

Karte 1 von 5

Wer sind die Taliban? Die Taliban entstanden 1994 inmitten der Unruhen nach dem Abzug der sowjetischen Truppen aus Afghanistan 1989. Sie setzten brutale öffentliche Strafen ein, darunter Auspeitschungen, Amputationen und Massenhinrichtungen, um ihre Regeln durchzusetzen. Hier ist mehr über ihre Entstehungsgeschichte und ihre Bilanz als Herrscher.

Wer sind die Taliban-Führer? Dies sind die obersten Anführer der Taliban, Männer, die jahrelang auf der Flucht, untergetaucht, im Gefängnis und amerikanischen Drohnen ausgewichen sind. Sie tauchen jetzt aus der Dunkelheit auf, aber über sie oder ihre Regierungspläne ist wenig bekannt.

Die beiden obersten Führer des Pentagon sagten am Mittwoch, dass die Vereinigten Staaten sich verpflichtet haben, alle Amerikaner zu evakuieren, die Afghanistan verlassen wollen, sowie Afghanen, die bei den Kriegsanstrengungen geholfen haben und für die Einreise in die Vereinigten Staaten freigegeben wurden.

„Wir beabsichtigen, diejenigen zu evakuieren, die uns seit Jahren unterstützen, und wir werden sie nicht zurücklassen“, sagte General Mark A. Milley, der Vorsitzende der Joint Chiefs of Staff, gegenüber Reportern. “Und wir werden so viele wie möglich rausbringen.”

Bei einer Pressekonferenz jedoch würden weder General Milley noch Verteidigungsminister Lloyd J. Austin III Amerikanern, Afghanen und anderen Ausländern außerhalb des Umkreises einen sicheren Durchgang zum Flughafen garantieren.

„Die Kräfte, die wir haben, konzentrieren sich auf die Sicherheit des Flugplatzes“, sagte Austin. “Ich habe nicht die Möglichkeit, die Operationen derzeit nach Kabul auszudehnen.”

Die Regierung hat darauf bestanden, dass ihre Handlungen in den letzten Monaten kalkulierte Entscheidungen und keine Fehltritte waren.

Sie stützte sich auf Geheimdienstinformationen, die belegen, dass eine Übernahme durch die Taliban 18 Monate entfernt war, und Beamte haben eingeräumt, dass sie das Tempo des Taliban-Vormarschs unterschätzt haben, als sie überlegten, ob Evakuierungen durchgeführt werden sollten. Viele Afghanen standen kurz vor dem Ende der Visa-Pipeline, was den Beamten ein falsches Gefühl gab, dass die Regierung genügend Zeit hatte, sich weiterhin auf das Visaprogramm zu verlassen.

Die Regierung hat auch die Bitte von Herrn Ghani im Laufe des Sommers betont, Evakuierungen so lange aufzuschieben, bis die Amerikaner Afghanistan verlassen haben.

„Die afghanische Regierung und ihre Unterstützer, darunter viele der Menschen, die jetzt ausreisen wollen, haben sich leidenschaftlich dafür eingesetzt, dass wir keine Massenevakuierungen durchführen sollten, damit wir nicht das Vertrauen in die Regierung verlieren“, sagte Jake Sullivan, der nationale Sicherheitsberater, sagte bei einer Pressekonferenz im Weißen Haus am Dienstag. “Unsere signalisierte Unterstützung für die Regierung hat die Regierung offensichtlich nicht gerettet, aber dies war ein wohlüberlegtes Urteil.”

Die Regierung zögerte monatelang, die Afghanen auf Militärstützpunkte in den Vereinigten Staaten oder ihren Territorien wie Guam zu verlegen, und zog es vor, sie stattdessen in andere Länder zu verlegen, so Regierungsbeamte und Personen, die mit den Beratungen des Weißen Hauses und des Außenministeriums vertraut waren. Viele der Evakuierten hätten während der Bearbeitung ihrer Visa nur vorübergehenden Schutz. Wenn ihnen das Visum verweigert würde, müssten sie in den USA Asyl oder eine andere Form des Schutzes beantragen – Einwanderungsprogramme, die die Republikaner ergriffen haben, um Herrn Biden anzugreifen.

„Sie befinden sich im Grunde in den Vereinigten Staaten, und es gibt keinen wirklich effektiven Weg, um effektiv nein zu sagen“, sagte Barbara L. Strack, eine ehemalige Leiterin der Abteilung für Flüchtlingsangelegenheiten bei Citizenship and Immigration Services während der Regierungen Bush und Obama . „Die Regierung macht sich Sorgen über die ‚Nein‘-Fälle.“

Ein ehemaliger Bauunternehmer für die Vereinigten Staaten, der aus Jalalabad umgesiedelt wurde, schlenderte am Montagnachmittag ziellos vor einer Wohnanlage im Osten von Maryland und machte sich mit seiner neuen Umgebung vertraut.

Der Mann, der aus Angst um seine Sicherheit nur als Masoon identifiziert werden wollte, sagte, er habe es nach einem 20-stündigen Zwischenstopp auf der Militärbasis Fort Lee in Virginia von Kabul nach Maryland geschafft. Obwohl er mit seiner Frau und seinen fünf Kindern wohlbehalten ankam, blieben seine Eltern und Schwestern in Dschalalabad.

„Ich bin hier sehr glücklich“, sagte Masoon, „aber mit meiner Familie bin ich nicht glücklich.“

Er fügte hinzu: „Die Taliban sind in Dschalalabad, und was kann ich in dieser Situation tun? Es ist wirklich eine gefährliche Sache.”

Masoon sagte, er habe seit seiner Abreise aus Afghanistan vor weniger als zwei Wochen jeglichen Kontakt zu ihnen verloren.

Eileen Sullivan, Jennifer Steinhauer, Michael D. Shear, Eric Schmitt, Catie Edmondson und Lara Jakes steuerten die Berichterstattung aus Washington bei.

Categories
World News

Left and Proper Conflict in Peru Election, With an Financial Mannequin at Stake

LIMA, Peru – On paper, the candidates for the presidential election in Peru on Sunday are a left-wing former schoolteacher with no government experience and the right-hand daughter of an imprisoned ex-president who ruled the country with an iron fist.

However, voters in Peru face an even more elementary choice: whether to stick to the neoliberal economic model that has dominated the country for the past three decades and has achieved some previous successes but ultimately fails to make sense to millions of Peruvians during the time support the pandemic.

“The model let a lot of people down,” said Cesia Caballero, 24, a video producer. The virus, she said, “was the last drop to tip the glass.”

Peru suffered the region’s worst economic slump during the pandemic, pushing nearly 10 percent of its population back into poverty. On Monday, the country announced that the virus death toll was nearly three times what it was previously reported, suddenly raising the per capita death rate to the highest in the world. Millions were unemployed and many others were displaced.

Left-wing candidate Pedro Castillo, 51, a union activist, has pledged to overhaul the political and economic system to combat poverty and inequality and to replace the current constitution with one that gives the state a greater role in the economy.

His opponent Keiko Fujimori, 46, has vowed to uphold the free-market model of her father Alberto Fujimori, who was originally credited with fighting back violent left-wing uprisings in the 1990s, but who is now despised by many as a corrupt autocrat.

Polls show the candidates in a close tie. But many voters are frustrated with their options.

Mr Castillo, who has never held office, has teamed up with a radical former governor convicted of corruption to launch his application. Ms. Fujimori has been arrested three times in money laundering investigations and faces a 30-year prison sentence for running a criminal organization that traded illicit campaign donations during a previous presidential run. She denies the allegations.

“We are between an abyss and an abyss,” said Augusto Chávez, 60, an artisan jeweler in Lima, who said he could cast a defaced vote in protest. Voting is compulsory in Peru. “I think extremes are bad for a country. And they represent two extremes. “

Mr. Castillo and Ms. Fujimori each won less than 20 percent of the vote in a crowded first-round race in April that forced the runoff election on Sunday.

The election follows a rocky five-year period in which the country went through four presidents and two congresses. And the pandemic has taken voter discontent to new levels, fueling anger over unequal access to public services and growing frustration with politicians embroiled in seemingly endless corruption scandals and political settlements.

The hospital system has become so strained by the pandemic that many have died of a lack of oxygen, while other doctors have paid for places in intensive care units – only to be turned away in excruciating ways.

Who wins on Sunday, said the Peruvian sociologist Lucía Dammert: “The future of Peru is a very turbulent future.”

“The deep injustices and the deep frustration of the people have moved, and there is no organization or no actor, neither private companies, the state, nor trade unions, which could give this a voice.”

When Fujimori’s father came to power as a populist outsider in 1990, he quickly broke an election promise not to implement a market-economy “shock” policy promoted by his rival and Western economist.

The measures he took – deregulation, cuts in government spending, privatization of industry – helped put an end to years of hyperinflation and recession. The constitution he introduced in 1993 restricted the state’s ability to participate in business activities and dissolve monopolies, strengthened the autonomy of the central bank and protected foreign investments.

Subsequent centrist and right-wing governments signed more than a dozen free trade agreements, and Peru’s pro-business policies were declared a success due to Peru’s record poverty reduction during the commodity boom of this century.

But little has been done to remove Peru’s reliance on raw material exports and long-standing social inequalities, or to ensure health, education and public services for its people.

The pandemic exposed the weakness of the Peruvian bureaucracy and underfunding of the public health system. The country had only a small fraction of its peers’ intensive care beds, and the government was slow and inconsistent in providing even a small amount of cash to those in need. Informal workers were left without a safety net, which led many to turn to high-interest loans from private banks.

“The pandemic showed that the underlying problem was the order of priorities,” said David Rivera, a Peruvian economist and political scientist. “Apparently we had saved money for so long to use in a crisis, and during the pandemic we saw that macroeconomic stability remains a priority, not people dying and starving.”

Ms. Fujimori blames the country’s problems not on its economic model but on the way previous presidents and other leaders have applied it. Still, she says, some adjustments are needed, such as raising the minimum wage and raising pension payments for the poor.

She designed her campaign against Mr Castillo as a struggle between democracy and communism, sometimes using Venezuela’s socialist-inspired government, now in crisis, as a foil. Mr. Castillo, a native of the northern highlands of Peru, gained national recognition by leading a strike by the teachers’ union in 2017. He wears the broad-brimmed hat of the Andean farmers and has performed with supporters on horseback and dancing.

“For us in the countryside we want someone who knows what it’s like to work in the fields,” says Demóstenes Reátegui.

When the pandemic started, Mr Reátegui, 29, was one of thousands of Peruvians who hitchhiked from Lima to his rural family home after a government lockdown pushed migrant workers like him out of their jobs.

It took him 28 days.

Mr Castillo has revealed little about how to keep vague promises to ensure the country’s copper, gold and natural gas resources benefit Peruvians more widely. He has promised not to seize any of the company’s assets and instead renegotiate contracts.

He said he wanted to restrict imports of agricultural products to support local farmers, a policy that economists have warned against would lead to higher food prices.

If he wins, it will be the clearest rejection by the country’s political elite since Fujimori took office in 1990.

“Why do we have so much inequality? Are you not outraged? ”Said Mr Castillo at a recent rally in southern Peru, referring to the country’s elites.

“You can’t lie to us anymore. People woke up, ”he said. “We can recapture this country!”

Categories
Business

Deepak Chopra left ‘heartbroken’ by India’s devastating Covid disaster

Global wellness expert Deepak Chopra told CNBC that he was “devastated” and “broken” over the Covid-19 crisis that is currently gripping India and said the country could have dealt with the situation much better.

Chopra, who was born and raised in New Delhi before continuing his medical education in the United States, hopes lessons will be learned from this.

“I think India could have done better. I think, as usual, political ideologies and conflicts, as well as interest groups, have exacerbated the crisis,” he said.

“India could have done this much better and I hope you learned, we all learned a lesson from it because you know there is no way to stop Indians from going into the world and what is going on in India That’s going to happen elsewhere if you’re not careful, ”he added.

“A very big mistake”

Chopra told CNBC that he feels responsible “ultimately falling to influencers and politicians and leaders for making the rules. And it was a very big mistake, in my opinion, to keep the Kumbh Mela and all these religious gatherings for political ones only.” Purposes. “

India has seen a deadly second wave of the Covid-19 virus in the past few weeks. According to the Johns Hopkins University, the country has reported over 27.5 million Covid cases and nearly 326,000 deaths.

Deepak Chopra, co-founder of the Chopra Center for Wellbeing and founder of the Chopra Foundation.

Adam Jeffery | CNBC

Chopra is not alone and many have criticized lawmakers and vaccine suppliers in the country. Prime Minister Modi defended the government’s vaccination strategy, telling ministers in April that “those who are in the habit of politics (playing) allow it … I have received various allegations. We cannot stop those who do this to do.” We really want to serve humanity, which we will continue to do, “he said, the Times of India reported.

He also noted that an earlier peak of infections had been controlled this past September at a time when vaccines were not available and cases and mass tests were being tracked and followed.

Pandemic “worsened our mental well-being”

Chopra, a global leader in integrative medicine and meditation, spoke about the release of a new free 21-day meditation experience with multi-award-winning singer-songwriter, activist, and entrepreneur Alicia Keys.

The meditation “Activation of the Divine Feminine: The Path to Wholeness” published on ChopraMeditation.com during Mental Health Awareness Month aims to “restore wholeness and bring peace and healing”.

Chopra and Keys believe that in today’s world of male and female energy there is an imbalance, regardless of gender, that needs to be addressed.

“Healing is ultimately the return of the memory of wholeness, and when we are not balanced with both masculine and feminine energies within ourselves, that imbalance is reflected in what we see in the world,” said Chopra.

The wellness icon, who is also the founder of the Chopra Foundation, a nonprofit focused on the study of wellbeing and humanity, told CNBC that he believes mental stress is “the number one pandemic in the world” stay.

“There is something wrong with our humanity right now as we are not concerned with mental well-being and sanity,” he said.

“Everything from climate change to pandemics, mass migrations, environmental destruction, weapons kills to wars and terrorism is a result of psychological distress, stress, anger, hostility and fear. So we have to deal with it. This is an emergency.” he went on.

He said the global pandemic only “worsened” the situation.

“The global pandemic has worsened our spiritual well-being, deteriorated our economic well-being, and spawned some ugliness such as racism and bigotry and hatred and prejudice and conflict,” he said.

“All over the world it’s not just Republicans and Democrats, but Protestants and Catholics, Muslims and Jews and Arabs, and Israelis and Indians and Pakistanis. I mean, if you don’t believe this crazy, you are explaining your own madness,” he added added.

When asked what individuals can do to make a difference and what he thinks is the solution to all these global problems, Chopra said, “If you want to change the world, start with yourself.”

“”Perform an act of kindness today … When we perform all acts of love in action and reach critical mass, the world will be a different place, “he told CNBC.

– CNBC’s Holly Ellyatt contributed to this article.

Categories
Health

France’s Le Maire says peace and safety in danger if African Covid restoration left behind

French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire on Wednesday warned that peace, security and global stability are in danger if the world’s economic superpowers do not contribute to Africa’s economic recovery from the Covid-19 crisis.

African leaders met in Paris over the past two days in a summit convened by France to strike a multibillion-dollar “New Deal” to aid the continent’s economic and health revival.

The Summit on the Financing of African Economies brought together 21 heads of state from Africa and leaders of continental organizations along with European leaders and the heads of major international finance organizations. In a press conference Tuesday night, French President Emmanuel Macron said the summit had yielded “a New Deal for Africa and by Africa.”

The signatories called for an additional $650 billion of IMF Special Drawing Rights to be released to close the gap between developed and emerging economies. However, only $33 billion of this has been earmarked for African countries and European leaders have vowed to donate their own shares in order to bring the total for the continent close to $100 billion.

The IMF may also contribute some of its gold reserves and in a joint communique after the summit leaders suggested that “flexibility on debt and deficit ceilings” could be used to further alleviate the burden.

G-7 and G-20 urged to contribute

Le Maire indicated on Wednesday that the French government would be pushing for greater contributions from other major economies at the upcoming G-7 (Group of Seven) summit in the U.K. in mid-June, and would also be reaching out to the G-20.

“Developed countries have invested more than 25% of their GDP to fight against the consequences of the crisis and to engage a very strong economic recovery. In Africa, it is less than 2% of their GDP,” Le Maire told CNBC’s Steve Sedgwick, adding that this trajectory risked a great divergence in the recoveries of economies and health care systems.

Workers transport the second shipment of the Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 coronavirus vaccine upon its arrival at the O R Tambo International Airport in Johannesburg on February 27, 2021.

Kim Ludbrook | AFP | Getty Images

“This would be a very important danger not only from an economic point of view, but a real danger for security, for peace, for stability, for illegal immigration, so I really urge everybody to be aware of the current situation of the African countries and to be aware of the necessity of putting more money (into) Africa.”

He suggested that rather than just deploying grants, governments should look to invest in small and medium-sized enterprises, supporting African entrepreneurs who are “at the core of the economic recovery.”

Despite maintaining comparatively low Covid-19 infection and death rates compared to the rest of the world, sub-Saharan Africa is projected by the IMF to have experienced a 3.3% decline in economic activity in 2020, the region’s first recession in 25 years. GDP growth projections for 2021 also lag significantly behind the rest of the world’s 6% estimate.

The drop in activity is expected to cost the region $115 billion in output losses this year and could push another 40 million people into poverty, effectively wiping out five years of progress against poverty.

In Tuesday’s press conference, Macron also set a goal to vaccinate 40% of the population of Africa by the end of 2021, calling the current situation both “unfair and inefficient.”

‘Vaccine apartheid’

The summit has urged the World Health Organization, World Trade Organization and the Medicines Patent Pool to remove intellectual property patents blocking the production of certain vaccines.

IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva cautioned on Tuesday of dire global economic consequences if the vaccine rollout fails in developing countries and the health crisis continues.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa on Wednesday told France24 that he welcomed the group’s call for major economies in the northern hemisphere to share their vaccine supplies.

“They have a huge surplus and we have no access, and that to me is vaccine apartheid and it can also be characterized as vaccine imperialism,” Ramaphosa said.

“We will never be able to defeat the pandemic, Covid-19, if we try to defeat it in the northern hemisphere only and not in the south.”

A landmark proposal to waive intellectual property rights on Covid-19 vaccines was jointly submitted to the World Trade Organization by India and South Africa in October.

Several months on, however, it continues to be stonewalled by a small number of governments. These include the U.K., Switzerland, Japan, Norway, Canada, Australia, Brazil, the EU and — until recently — the United States.

Categories
Business

‘We Had been Left With Nothing’: Argentina’s Distress Deepens within the Pandemic

Before the pandemic, Carla Huanca and her family made modest but meaningful improvements to their cramped apartment in the Buenos Aires slums.

She worked as a hairdresser. Her partner ran the bar in a night club. Together, they brought home about 25,000 pesos ($ 270) a week – enough to add a second story to their home and make extra space for their three boys. They were just about to plaster the walls.

“Then everything closed up,” said Ms. Huanca, 33. “We had nothing left.”

Amid the lockdown, she and her family needed emergency handouts from the Argentine government to keep food on the table. You have come to terms with rough walls. They have chosen to use wireless internet service so their children can manage distance learning.

“We have all spent our savings,” said Ms. Huanca.

The global economic devastation that has accompanied Covid-19 has been particularly severe in Argentina, a country that has entered the pandemic deep in crisis. The economy contracted nearly 10 percent in 2020, the third straight year of the recession.

The pandemic has accelerated an exodus of foreign investment, which has depressed the value of the Argentine peso. This has increased the cost of imports such as food and fertilizers and kept the inflation rate above 40 percent. More than four in ten Argentines are plunged into poverty.

Hanging over national life is an inevitable renegotiation later this year with the International Monetary Fund, an institution Argentines widely loathe for bailing out crippling budget cuts two decades ago.

With public finances exhausted from the pandemic, Argentina must work out a new repayment plan for $ 45 billion in debt to the IMF. That burden is the result of the fund’s most recent bailout and the largest in the institute’s history – a $ 57 billion package of loans to Argentina extended in 2018.

Now under new management, the fund has diminished its traditional fear of austerity and alleviated some of the usual fears. Even so, the negotiations are sure to be complex and politically stormy.

The Argentine government, led by President Alberto Fernández, is deeply divided ahead of the mid-term elections in October. The government faces a major challenge from the left. A former president – and the current vice president – Cristina Fernández de Kirchner are calling for a more combative stance towards the IMF

Companies assume that the government has not developed a strategy that can generate sustainable economic growth. Liberating Argentina from stagnation and inflation is a goal that has eluded the country’s leaders for decades. In a country where its national debt has defaulted no less than nine times, skepticism continues to harm national wealth by limiting investment.

“There is no plan. There’s no going forward, ”said Miguel Kiguel, a former Argentine finance secretary who heads Econviews, a Buenos Aires-based advisor. “How can you get companies to invest? There is still no trust. “

The Fernández government is taking advantage of a more cooperative relationship with the IMF and is trying to reach an agreement with the institution that will save the government penalizing budget cuts and allowing spending to stimulate economic growth.

Such hopes would once have been unrealistic. From Indonesia to Turkey to Argentina, the IMF has forced countries to cut spending amid crises, remove fuel for economic growth and punish those in need of public aid.

Today’s IMF, led by Kristalina Georgieva for the past two years, has eased the institution’s traditional obsession with budget discipline. She has called on governments to impose property taxes to help finance the cost of the pandemic – a measure Argentina passed late last year.

The Fund’s analysis of Argentina’s debt picture and the conclusion that the burden was unsustainable formed the basis for an agreement with international creditors last year. Investors eventually agreed to write down the value of approximately $ 66 billion worth of bonds to overcome opposition from the world’s largest wealth manager BlackRock.

The Argentine government believes it can close a deal from the fund that will allow the country to move its debt significantly and free up impending payments – $ 3.8 billion this year and more than $ 18 billion – dollars next year – without strict requirements it lowered spending.

“The IMF leadership has made it clear that this is the framework,” said Joseph E. Stiglitz, Nobel Laureate from Columbia University in New York. The new regime will reflect “the new IMF,” he added, “recognizing that austerity measures are not working and recognizing their concerns about poverty. “

The expected flexibility of the IMF vis-à-vis Argentina reflects the increasing trust in President Fernández and his Minister of Economics, Martin Guzmán, who studied with Mr. Stiglitz.

Updated

April 19, 2021, 5:23 p.m. ET

On the surface, its management represents a return to the thinking that has animated public life in Argentina since the 1940s under the leadership of Juan Domingo Perón. His presidency was characterized by muscular state authority, public generosity for the poor, and contempt for budgetary considerations.

Peronist politicians have repeatedly showered aid to struggling communities and been forgotten by paying the bills in pesos. This has often led to runaway inflation, crisis and despair. Reformists have temporarily taken power with mandates to restore the financial regulation by cutting public spending. This made the poor angry and laid the foundation for the next upswing of the Peronists.

The last president, Mauricio Macri, took office as the supposed solution to this cycle of booms and busts. International investors celebrated him as a pioneer of a new, technocratic governance approach.

But Mr Macri went over the top by taking advantage of his popularity with investors. He borrowed profusely, despite fighting the poor by cutting government programs. Its debt frenzy, coupled with yet another recession, forced the country to submit to the ultimate humiliation and seek help from the IMF.

In the elections two years ago, voters rejected Mr Macri and installed Mr Fernández – a Peronist. Some suggested that Mr Fernández might take a tough stance on creditors, including the IMF. However, the Fernández administration has shown itself to be pragmatic, gaining the trust of the IMF while continuing to exonerate the poor.

“We have to avoid following the patterns of the past that have caused so much damage,” said Minister of Economic Affairs Guzmán in an interview. “We want to be constructive and solve these problems in a way that works.”

The most damaging problem remains inflation, a reality that is attacking businesses and households and adding to the burden of higher food prices on the poor.

In large economies like the United States, central banks traditionally respond to inflation by raising interest rates. However, this wipes out economic growth – not a tenable proposition in Argentina, where the central bank is already keeping interest rates at the stultifying level of 38 percent.

Instead, Mr Guzmán has pressured unions to accept meager wage increases, arguing that smaller paychecks will go on if inflation can be tamed. He introduced price controls on food and urged other companies to maintain lower prices on their products.

The government has also raised taxes on exports, angering ranchers and farmers.

“They spend more time filling out government tables than producing,” complained Martín Palazón, a farmer who grows soybeans, corn and wheat and raises cattle outside of Buenos Aires.

However, the lawsuits from Argentine companies and the mounting burdens on the poor coincide with the fact that the country’s prospects are already improving.

The Argentine economy is expected to grow nearly 7 percent this year as soybean exports generate growth while high commodity prices give the country a necessary source of hard currency.

Many Argentine companies remain doubtful that the recovery can gain momentum, especially as the central bank maintains high interest rates.

Edelflex, a company based outside of Buenos Aires, develops liquid management equipment used by breweries, food processors, and pharmaceutical manufacturers. High borrowing costs have prevented the company from making improvements to its assets that could lead to additional growth, said company president Miguel Harutiunian.

“We are inevitably short-term and we cannot invest in new technology,” said Harutiunian. “The ultimate goal of a company – or a country – cannot be just to survive.”

Texcom, a textile manufacturer with three plants in Argentina, produces fabrics for international sporting goods brands. The company stopped production amid a government-mandated quarantine last March. By May, Texcom had reopened and moved to an urgent need area: it was supplying materials for protective equipment such as masks that were needed by the medical staff on the front lines.

Even so, the company’s production is down in half from last year’s 2019, and production is expected to hit just 70 percent of preandemic levels this year.

The company’s president, Javier Chornik, is now used to the fact that his wealth rises and falls with the constantly volatile fluctuations in the economy.

“Argentina has been in a maze for years and it can’t get out,” he said. “The country always seems to grow, then there is a crisis and we go back. We go and come back and we never get any further. “

In the slum in southern Buenos Aires, Ms. Huanca’s partner recently reclaimed his old nightclub job, but rising food and fuel prices had effectively reduced her income.

Then came a spate of new Covid cases in their neighborhood. The government imposed new restrictions amid concerns that variants could spread rapidly in neighboring Brazil. Her partner’s employer reduced his working hours and halved his salary.

“I’m scared of what might happen now,” she said. “Everyone is very concerned.”

Categories
World News

Girls, 86 P.c Absent From Jordan’s Work Pressure, Are Left Behind

AMMAN, Jordan – Marwa Alomari’s compassionate and patient style made her a popular English teacher who filled her classes in Irbid, Jordan with eager students and her free hours of private tuition.

As a college graduate, she received up to $ 3,000 a month, far more than most other Jordanians.

But after she married an army officer and moved in with his family, he began to get annoyed that she was paid more than he was. Although she contributed to the household with both money and housework, he and his family discouraged her from work and the marriage almost collapsed, she said.

“I was absolutely convinced that I would not stop, but at some point I found no support and just got tired and gave up,” said Ms. Alomari, 35. “I cooked, cleaned and gossiped with women again. And that wasn’t my ambition. “

Her story mirrors what is happening across Jordan – a small Arab monarchy that has been an unwavering ally of Western countries – where women’s status in terms of labor force participation, health and politics has declined for years, and even behind more conservative countries in the US remains region.

For the past 10 years, the country has been at the bottom of the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Report, which highlights gaps between women and men in employment, education, health and politics.

After large increases over the past three decades, more women than men have graduated in the country, and women also have higher literacy rates.

Nevertheless, according to government data and the latest Global Gender Gap Report, 86 percent of women in the country are inactive. According to the World Bank, this is the highest rate in the world for a country not at war.

In contrast, Western Europe has moved and continues in the direction of gender equality the most, followed by North America.

And the effects can be felt far beyond the economy.

“As long as women are absent from the labor market, they are not represented in public,” said Asma Khader, president of the non-profit group Sisterhood is Global Institute in Jordan. “Top officials are afraid to make decisions in favor of women because society is conservative. But I believe if there are real economic reforms, women will be empowered and challenged. “

With its close ties to the West, an outspoken queen, female MPs and police officers, Jordan has long had the image of a relatively progressive kingdom in a conservative neighborhood. Recently, however, some golf neighbors have seen an increasing number of women-run startups and changes in labor legislation that have resulted in growing opportunities for women.

In Jordan, the head of household is usually defined as a husband unless he is dead, missing, or has lost his citizenship. This gives him sole guardianship over children, with authority over matters such as travel, citizenship, and opening bank accounts. In Saudi Arabia, due to the recent changes, at least in theory, women could also be viewed as “householders”.

Traditional attitudes, discriminatory laws, lack of access to public transport and wage differentials are hindering the advancement of women in Jordan.

The November elections to the country’s 130-seat parliament were testament to the declining role of women. Turnout was low and female candidates lost heavily. Women did not occupy a single seat beyond the quota of 15 female legislators, compared to 20 in the previous parliament.

Sara Ababneh, assistant professor of politics and international relations at the University of Jordan, said the problem extends beyond the elections.

“Sometimes we talk about women’s representation – we say there should be more women ministers,” she said. “But we never talk about universal rights and real political empowerment.”

Recent research by the World Bank has shown that men in Jordan are paid up to 40 percent more than women for the same job in the private sector. In the public sector, the gap is 28 percent.

The employment gaps – 53 percent of men are employed compared to 14 percent of women – are almost twice as high as in neighboring countries such as Bahrain, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates.

The traditional roles in Jordan are enshrined in laws that distinguish between the rights and duties of women and men. There is no law that prohibits gender discrimination in the workplace. And while the constitution provides that “every worker must receive a wage commensurate with the quantity and quality of their work”, there is no right to equal pay for women and men.

For Muslims, who make up the majority of Jordan’s nearly 11 million population, marriage, divorce, custody and inheritance issues are governed by Sharia or Islamic law and are decided by Sharia courts rather than civil or military courts. For example, under Sharia law, women can inherit property, but daughters receive half as much as sons.

And during the Arab Spring a decade ago, many women and human rights defenders attacked a parliamentary committee for breaking its promise to include the word gender in Article 6 of the Constitution, which aims to ensure equality for all Jordanians. It states: “There must be no discrimination between Jordanians with regard to their rights and obligations on the basis of race, language or religion.”

Despite the obstacles, some women have managed to be successful in their careers.

Jamileh Shetewi is an exception among Jordanian women in every way. She grew up with her eight siblings and parents in a mud-walled one-room house and spent her childhood picking tomatoes, eggplants and bananas with her four sisters on hot and shadowless farms.

The odds were against them.

She dropped out of school at the age of 17 and married at the age of 18. As a young farmer, she was paid $ 3 less a day than the men she worked with from 1997 to 2002 and had to cook for them on top of her job.

She decided to go back to school and did her PhD. in archeology. Today she heads the antiques department in the Jordan Valley region.

“Yes, I defied all expectations,” said Ms. Shetewi, 50. “I fought and destroyed the culture of shame.” But without changing laws and perceptions, most women will not be able to move forward.

“I didn’t care what people had to say and I said to my husband, ‘I need your support to make our lives better,” she said. “We are not the enemy. Believe that a country without half of its population can reform and prosper? “